REVIEW 7 cited by
Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in reasoning-enhanced large language models (LLMs), such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI-o3, have demonstrated significant progress. However, their application in professional medical contexts remains underexplored, particularly in evaluating the quality of their reasoning processes alongside final outputs. Here, we introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references derived from clinical case reports. Spanning 13 body systems and 10 specialties, it includes both common and rare diseases. To comprehensively evaluate LLM performance, we propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey. To assess reasoning quality, we present the Reasoning Evaluator, a novel automated system that objectively scores free-text reasoning responses based on efficiency, actuality, and completeness using dynamic cross-referencing and evidence checks. Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc. Our results show that current LLMs achieve over 85% accuracy in relatively simple diagnostic tasks when provided with sufficient examination results. However, performance declines in more complex tasks, such as examination recommendation and treatment planning. While reasoning outputs are generally reliable, with factuality scores exceeding 90%, critical reasoning steps are frequently missed. These findings underscore both the progress and limitations of clinical LLMs. Notably, open-source models like DeepSeek-R1 are narrowing the gap with proprietary systems, highlighting their potential to drive accessible and equitable advancements in healthcare.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
ClinicalMC: A Benchmark for Multi-Course Clinical Decision-Making with Large Language Models
ClinicalMC is a benchmark of 1,275 Chinese and 5,804 English multi-course clinical samples across four stages, evaluated via a multi-agent framework on closed-source, open-source, and medical LLMs in static and dynami...
-
Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning
A dual clinical-computational taxonomy for medical LLM reasoning plus a five-level 5k-sample benchmark showing specialists excel at diagnosis and general models at decision support/dialogue.
-
EHRBench: An Automated and Reliable EHR-based Benchmark for Clinical Decision Making with LLMs
EHRBench uses an EHR-LLM-KB pipeline to automatically create 960,067 reliable QA items spanning diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis for large-scale LLM evaluation in clinical decision making.
-
CLR-voyance: Reinforcing Open-Ended Reasoning for Inpatient Clinical Decision Support with Outcome-Aware Rubrics
CLR-voyance reformulates inpatient reasoning as POMDP with clinician-validated outcome rubrics, yielding an 8B model that outperforms larger frontier models on the authors' new benchmark.
-
R2MED: A Benchmark for Reasoning-Driven Medical Retrieval
R2MED is the first benchmark for reasoning-driven medical retrieval, where even top models reach only 41.4 nDCG@10 on queries requiring inference beyond lexical or semantic overlap.
-
DEEPMED Search: An Open-Source Agentic Platform for Medical Deep Research with Introspective Verification
DEEPMED Search is an open-source platform with source-adaptive routing and introspective multi-agent verification for generating citation-backed medical research reports.
-
CAREAgent: Clinical Agent with Structured Reasoning and Tool-Integrated for Order Generation
CAREAgent uses two-stage data construction, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning to improve clinical order generation F1 scores on benchmarks including unseen ClinicalBench.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.