Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

LLMs for Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00125 v1 pith:CVF2WCX5 submitted 2025-03-31 cs.AI cs.CL

Ahsan Bilal , David Ebert , Beiyu Lin This is my paper
classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelsllmsusersexplainablemodelapproachescomprehensivehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising approach to enhancing Explainable AI (XAI) by transforming complex machine learning outputs into easy-to-understand narratives, making model predictions more accessible to users, and helping bridge the gap between sophisticated model behavior and human interpretability. AI models, such as state-of-the-art neural networks and deep learning models, are often seen as "black boxes" due to a lack of transparency. As users cannot fully understand how the models reach conclusions, users have difficulty trusting decisions from AI models, which leads to less effective decision-making processes, reduced accountabilities, and unclear potential biases. A challenge arises in developing explainable AI (XAI) models to gain users' trust and provide insights into how models generate their outputs. With the development of Large Language Models, we want to explore the possibilities of using human language-based models, LLMs, for model explainabilities. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of existing approaches regarding LLMs for XAI, and evaluation techniques for LLM-generated explanation, discusses the corresponding challenges and limitations, and examines real-world applications. Finally, we discuss future directions by emphasizing the need for more interpretable, automated, user-centric, and multidisciplinary approaches for XAI via LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SynthEHR-Eviction: Enhancing Eviction SDoH Detection with LLM-Augmented Synthetic EHR Data

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-augmented synthetic data pipeline produces the largest public eviction-focused SDoH dataset (14 categories) and fine-tuned open LLMs that outperform prompt-optimized GPT-4o on the authors' test sets.

  2. GeoVision Labeler: Zero-Shot Geospatial Classification with Vision and Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A zero-shot geospatial classifier that turns satellite images into text descriptions and uses a language model to assign labels, plus an optional LLM-based hierarchical clustering for many-class datasets.

  3. Operational Evidence Gaps for LLMs in Fraud Detection and Trust-and-Safety Workflows

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey of 49 LLM fraud and trust-and-safety papers finds that fraud work reports almost no per-decision latency, cost, or calibration evidence, while moderation work reports more.

  4. SMT-AD: a scalable quantum-inspired anomaly detection approach

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SMT-AD detects anomalies via superposed multiresolution bond-dimension-1 MPOs with Fourier embedding, claiming competitive baseline performance and linear parameter scaling.

  5. Trust and Reputation in Data Sharing: A Survey

    cs.SI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey of trust and reputation management systems that introduces data-sharing-specific taxonomies and finds a consistent gap: systems evaluate entities, not data quality or consumer compliance.

  6. Agentic AI in 6G Software Businesses: A Layered Maturity Model

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A preliminary thematic review distills 29 motivators and 27 demotivators for agentic AI adoption in 6G software businesses into five themes each and outlines a future maturity model.

  7. Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Activation-frequency analysis identifies sparse units in LLMs that respond to instructions; same-category instructions share more of these units than different-category ones, and fine-tuning measurably changes the sets.

  8. RACE-Align: Retrieval-Augmented and Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Preference Alignment for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    RACE-Align generates preference pairs from RAG-grounded chain-of-thought answers and applies DPO to align a 1.7B model, showing improved reasoning scores in TCM QA but lacking statistical support.

Pith tools