Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unleashing the Power of LLMs in Dense Retrieval with Query Likelihood Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05216 v3 pith:P2HPXGKY submitted 2025-04-07 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords documentllmsretrievaltokensattentiondenselanguagellm-ql
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dense retrieval is a crucial task in Information Retrieval (IR), serving as the basis for downstream tasks such as re-ranking and augmenting generation. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive semantic understanding capabilities, making them attractive to researchers focusing on dense retrieval. While LLMs, as decoder-style generative models, excel in language generation, they often fall short in modeling global information due to a lack of attention to subsequent tokens. Drawing inspiration from the classical word-based language modeling approach for IR, specifically the query likelihood (QL) model, we aim to leverage the generative strengths of LLMs through QL maximization. Rather than employing QL estimation for document ranking, we propose an auxiliary task of QL maximization to enhance the backbone for subsequent contrastive learning of the retriever. We introduce our model, LLM-QL, which incorporates two key components: Attention Block (AB) and Document Corruption (DC). AB blocks the attention of predictive tokens to the document tokens before the document's ending token, while DC corrupts a document by masking a portion of its tokens during prediction. Evaluations on the in-domain (MS MARCO) and out-of-domain dataset (BEIR) indicate LLM-QL's superiority over other LLM-based retrievers. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses also validate the efficacy of LLM-QL and its components.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstructing Content with Collaborative Attention for Universal Multimodal Representation Learning

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CoCoA forces an MLLM to reconstruct masked text through a single EOS token, improving multimodal embedding quality on MMEB-V1 and matching MoCa at 3B with far less pretraining data.

  2. A Comparative Study of Specialized LLMs as Dense Retrievers

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Specialized Qwen2.5 7B models differ in dense retrieval quality: math and long-reasoning variants degrade performance, while coder and vision-language variants improve zero-shot text and code retrieval.

Pith tools