Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

InstructRAG: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Instruction Graphs for LLM-Based Task Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.13032 v1 pith:KARGGWTW submitted 2025-04-17 cs.AI cs.IR

classification cs.AIcs.IR
keywords planninginstructragtaskgenerationperformancetasksagentschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use as agents for planning complex tasks. Existing methods typically rely on a thought-action-observation (TAO) process to enhance LLM performance, but these approaches are often constrained by the LLMs' limited knowledge of complex tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers new opportunities by leveraging external databases to ground generation in retrieved information. In this paper, we identify two key challenges (enlargability and transferability) in applying RAG to task planning. We propose InstructRAG, a novel solution within a multi-agent meta-reinforcement learning framework, to address these challenges. InstructRAG includes a graph to organize past instruction paths (sequences of correct actions), an RL-Agent with Reinforcement Learning to expand graph coverage for enlargability, and an ML-Agent with Meta-Learning to improve task generalization for transferability. The two agents are trained end-to-end to optimize overall planning performance. Our experiments on four widely used task planning datasets demonstrate that InstructRAG significantly enhances performance and adapts efficiently to new tasks, achieving up to a 19.2% improvement over the best existing approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HiPlan: Hierarchical Planning for LLM-Based Agents with Adaptive Global-Local Guidance

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HiPlan melds a global milestone roadmap with per-step hints retrieved from a library of past demonstrations, and reports higher success rates than REACT, Reflexion, and TRAD on ALFWorld and WebShop.

  2. Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that groups graph-empowered AI agent research into planning, execution, memory, and multi-agent coordination, plus agents-for-graphs and applications.

Pith tools