Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Toward a Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy LLM-Powered GUI Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17934 v2 pith:UD6WRCLC submitted 2025-04-24 cs.HC cs.CLcs.CR

classification cs.HCcs.CLcs.CR
keywords agentsevaluationassessmentsprivacyriskssecurityagentautomation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized Graphical User Interface (GUI) automation through LLM-powered GUI agents, yet their ability to process sensitive data with limited human oversight raises significant privacy and security risks. This position paper identifies three key risks of GUI agents and examines how they differ from traditional GUI automation and general autonomous agents. Despite these risks, existing evaluations focus primarily on performance, leaving privacy and security assessments largely unexplored. We review current evaluation metrics for both GUI and general LLM agents and outline five key challenges in integrating human evaluators for GUI agent assessments. To address these gaps, we advocate for a human-centered evaluation framework that incorporates risk assessments, enhances user awareness through in-context consent, and embeds privacy and security considerations into GUI agent design and evaluation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ReGUIDE: Data Efficient GUI Grounding via Spatial Reasoning and Search

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ReGUIDE reaches state-of-the-art GUI grounding accuracy using 0.2% of the usual training data by adding self-generated reasoning, spatial-consistency training, and test-time KDE coordinate search.

  2. Dark Patterns Meet GUI Agents: LLM Agent Susceptibility to Manipulative Interfaces and the Role of Human Oversight

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GUI agents frequently fall for deceptive interface designs, often without recognizing them, and human supervision of agents improves avoidance only partially while introducing new attention and workload costs.

Pith tools