REVIEW 4 cited by
Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Reasoners via Gradient Variance Minimization in Rejection Sampling and RL
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs) can be formalized as a latent variable problem, where the model needs to generate intermediate reasoning steps. While prior approaches such as iterative reward-ranked fine-tuning (RAFT) have relied on such formulations, they typically apply uniform inference budgets across prompts, which fails to account for variability in difficulty and convergence behavior. This work identifies the main bottleneck in CoT training as inefficient stochastic gradient estimation due to static sampling strategies. We propose GVM-RAFT, a prompt-specific Dynamic Sample Allocation Strategy designed to minimize stochastic gradient variance under a computational budget constraint. The method dynamically allocates computational resources by monitoring prompt acceptance rates and stochastic gradient norms, ensuring that the resulting gradient variance is minimized. Our theoretical analysis shows that the proposed dynamic sampling strategy leads to accelerated convergence guarantees under suitable conditions. Experiments on mathematical reasoning show that GVM-RAFT achieves a 2-4x speedup and considerable accuracy improvements over vanilla RAFT. The proposed dynamic sampling strategy is general and can be incorporated into other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as GRPO, leading to similar improvements in convergence and test accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/RLHFlow/GVM.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
A Task-Centric Theory for Iterative Self-Improvement with Easy-to-Hard Curricula
Iterative self-improvement provably keeps improving only when initial performance lies in a moderate difficulty interval, and easy-to-hard curricula beat fixed mixtures under moderate difficulty separation and suffici...
-
SIGMA: Refining Large Language Model Reasoning via Sibling-Guided Monte Carlo Augmentation
Sibling-guided critique and revision of MCTS reasoning traces yields a 30K-sample dataset that matches or beats 590K-sample baselines on the MATH benchmark for 7B models.
-
Distill Where You Fail: Recovering Learning Signals of Negative RL-Groups from Adaptive Teacher Guidance
RSTG selectively distills a teacher on negative zero-variance prompts, with confidence weighting, token-level selection, and auxiliary SFT, improving math and code RL post-training over naive GRPO+OPD.
-
Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
OBLR-PO combines an SNR-based learning rate and a gradient-weighted baseline for RLVR, but the main theory is undermined by a flawed smoothness proof.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.