REVIEW 2 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Optimization and variability can coexist
read the original abstract
Many biological systems perform close to their physical limits, but promoting this optimality to a general principle seems to require implausibly fine tuning of parameters. Using examples from a wide range of systems, we show that this intuition is wrong. Near an optimum, functional performance depends on parameters in a "sloppy'' way, with some combinations of parameters being only weakly constrained. Absent any other constraints, this predicts that we should observe widely varying parameters, and we make this precise: the entropy in parameter space can be extensive even if performance on average is very close to optimal. This removes a major objection to optimization as a general principle, and rationalizes the observed variability.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Social-spatial dependencies for learning visual navigation
Neural-network agents trained in social environments learn hybrid navigation strategies that combine individual landmark use with social following, with strategy shifts driven by the ratio of skilled to unskilled soci...
-
Anti-Collapse Dynamics and the Emergence of Multi-Time-Scale Learning in Recurrent Neural Networks
RNNs can sustain power-law forgetting and multi-time-scale learning when heavy-tailed fluctuations in SGD balance the collapse tendency toward short time scales, governed by a spectral exponent β.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.