Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 17 cited by

ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read ACE-Step is an open-source diffusion model that generates up to four minutes of coherent, lyric-aligned music in about 20 seconds on an A100, roughly 15x faster than LLM-based song generators.

desk verdict A real open-source music generation system with credible speed and control, but the paper's own figures contradict its SOTA quality claim and the human evaluation is statistically weak. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00045 v1 pith:BCQOOEJZ submitted 2025-05-28 cs.SD eess.AS

Junmin Gong , Sean Zhao , Sen Wang , Shengyuan Xu , Joe Guo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords text-to-musicgenerationmusicfoundationmodeldiffusionflowmatchingdeepcompressionautoencoderrepresentationalignmentlyriccontrollable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ACE-Step is the paper's attempt to break the speed-versus-coherence trade-off in text-to-music generation. The authors claim that a diffusion model operating on a heavily compressed mel-spectrogram latent, trained with flow matching and a semantic alignment loss, can generate up to four minutes of music with coherent melody, harmony, rhythm, and sung lyrics in about 20 seconds on an A100 GPU. That speed is roughly 15x faster than LLM-based baselines, and the semantic alignment loss is what they credit for lyric adherence. The model is positioned as an open-source foundation: the same latent and conditioning stack supports voice cloning, lyric editing, remixing, and fine-tuned tasks such as lyric-to-vocal and accompaniment generation. If these claims hold, ACE-Step is practical infrastructure for building music-AI tools, not just another end-to-end text-to-song pipeline.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a four-part stack. First, Music-DCAE, a deep compression autoencoder that maps mel-spectrograms into a latent with 8x compression in time and frequency (f8c8, channel 8, about 10.77 Hz), which makes multi-minute generation cheap; the authors abandoned 32x compression for poor quality and 1D VAEs for high-frequency vocal artifacts. Second, a linear DiT denoiser adapted from Sana, with linear attention, a single shared AdaLN-single layer, and 1D convolutional FFNs. Third, flow matching: the denoiser is trained to predict $v_{\text{out}} = -(x_0 - z)$ along a linear interpolation $x_{\text{noisy}} = (1-\sigma_t)x_0 + \sigma_t z$, with loss $\mathcal{L}_{FM} = \mathbb{E}[\lVert (-\sigma_t)v_{\text{out}} + x_{\text{noisy}} - x_0\rVert^2_2]$. Fourth, the REPA semantic alignment loss $\mathcal{L}_{SSL} = \tfrac{1}{2}(\cos(h'_{DiT}, h'_{MERT}) + \cos(h'_{DiT}, h'_{mHuBERT}))$, where temporally aligned features from the 8th DiT layer are matched to MERT (75 Hz) and mHuBERT (50 Hz) teachers. The authors' argument is that this alignment makes lyric adherence a low-frequency structural priority instead of a late high-frequency detail, which is why they credit REPA for both convergence speed and lyric alignment.

What would settle it

Retrain ACE-Step from the same checkpoint with and without the REPA loss (set the semantic alignment weight to zero) and measure Whisper forced-alignment confidence and phoneme-boundary accuracy on the same 20 prompts; if the two models are statistically indistinguishable, the central mechanism claim collapses. A second check would be to test whether interpolated MERT and mHuBERT features at the latent's roughly 10.77 Hz temporal rate still contain recoverable phoneme boundaries at all.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated the way the authors state it, is that the long-standing trade-off between generation speed, musical coherence, and controllability can be resolved by a diffusion architecture rather than an autoregressive one. ACE-Step compresses mel-spectrograms with a Music-DCAE at 8x time-frequency compression (about 10.77 Hz temporal resolution), denoises that latent with a linear DiT (linear attention, AdaLN-single, 1D convolutional FFNs), and trains with a flow-matching objective plus a REPA semantic alignment loss. The alignment loss matches the DiT's 8th-layer features to MERT and mHuBERT features of the clean audio after temporal interpolation, with weight 1.0 and a reduced mHuBERT component late in training. On the paper's measurements, the model produces 4 minutes of audio in about 20 seconds on an A100 (RTF 15.63x on an RTX 4090, about 188x faster than Yue and about 1.5x faster than DiffRhythm), scores roughly 85, 82, 80, and 78 in human-rated emotion, innovativeness, sound quality, and musicality against three commercial baselines, and ranks first among open-source models on SongEval musicality. The paper acknowledges that its mel-DCAE reconstruction FAD does not beat DiffRhythm's 1D VAE, so audio fidelity is the admitted next bottleneck.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that aligning ACE-Step's 8th-layer DiT features to time-aligned MERT and mHuBERT features of the clean audio transfers phoneme-level timing and lyric content into generation; if interpolation or pooling to a common temporal grid erases phoneme boundaries, the lyric-alignment and coherence claims lose their mechanism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Four-minute songs can be generated in about 20 seconds on an A100, so multi-minute music moves from batch jobs to near-interactive use.
  • Diffusion-based decoding removes the need for token-by-token autoregressive prediction, so output length and speed no longer have to trade off the way they do in LLM-based song generators.
  • The same foundation supports training-free controls (variations, repainting, lyric editing) and fine-tuned adapters (lyric-to-vocal, text-to-sample, stem generation, accompaniment), so a single model can serve many music-production tasks.
  • The 19-language lyric pipeline with phonemic conversion and the variable-length sampler make user-specified durations and non-Romanized lyrics practical in one system.
  • On SongEval, which the paper argues is the objective metric most aligned with human judgment, ACE-Step ranks first among the open-source models tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the REPA loss is the true driver of lyric adherence, the same alignment pattern could transfer to other alignment-critical generation tasks, such as text-to-speech or singing voice synthesis, where a single mHuBERT-style teacher might suffice.
  • The reported 20-second A100 generation time and 15.63x RTF should be re-run on identical prompts before being treated as stable; the paper's own evaluation notes that prompting and audio-reference protocol materially change baseline comparisons.
  • The mel-spectrogram DCAE caps fidelity, as the paper's FAD table shows the 1D DiffRhythm VAE reconstructs better, so replacing the autoencoder is the most direct route to close the remaining quality gap with commercial systems.
  • A text-only evaluation protocol would make open-source comparisons more realistic than the audio-prompted setups used in some baseline papers, but it will penalize models designed for audio conditioning, so the community needs a single agreed protocol before leaderboard numbers are reliable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. ACE-Step is an open-source music generation foundation model built on a flow-matching diffusion backbone over a mel-spectrogram latent space obtained from a Deep Compression AutoEncoder. A linear DiT (3.5B parameters) is conditioned on mT5 text embeddings, a SongGen-style lyric encoder, and a speaker encoder, and trained with a flow-matching loss plus an auxiliary REPA-style cosine-similarity loss against MERT and mHuBERT features. The paper reports training on roughly 100,000 hours of music in 19 languages, claims state-of-the-art quality and superior coherence/lyric alignment, and reports synthesis of up to 4 minutes in about 20 seconds, along with downstream capabilities such as voice cloning, lyric editing, remixing, and LoRA/ControlNet variants. The evaluation consists of a 32-participant blind listening test, automatic metrics (FAD, CLAP/Mulan, Whisper forced alignment, Audiobox aesthetics, SongEval), and speed benchmarks.

Significance. If the quality claims were supported, ACE-Step would be a notable contribution: it is one of the first open-source latent-diffusion text-to-music models with a linear-transformer backbone, a large-scale multilingual training set, a compact latent space, and a demonstrated suite of controllability tools. The release of code and weights, the detailed training configurations in Appendix A, and the use of external evaluation suites such as SongEval, Audiobox, and Whisper forced alignment are concrete strengths that make the claims checkable. However, the paper's own figures do not support the abstract's 'state-of-the-art' and 'superior' claims; the strongest verifiable contributions are the architectural combination and the speed/controllability results rather than the quality ranking.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.3, Figures 3(a)-4(b)] The abstract claims 'superior musical coherence and lyric alignment across melody, harmony, and rhythm metrics,' and Section 5.3 states that 'As shown in Figure 3a, our model demonstrates significantly higher genre fidelity scores compared to competing approaches.' Both statements are contradicted by the reported rankings: Figure 3(a) shows Udio v1 and Hailuo above ACE-Step on genre/style alignment, Figure 3(b) shows Hailuo best on lyric alignment with ACE-Step merely 'also performed well,' and Figure 4(b) shows Suno v3 highest on SongEval Coherence. In addition, no error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests accompany any automatic metric. Please report the numerical scores with uncertainty, run pairwise significance tests, and either substantiate or retract the comparative quality claims.
  2. [Sections 3.3.2 and 3.1.4] The REPA loss is central to the lyric-alignment and coherence claims, but the only support is the unquantified statement in Section 3.1.4 that models trained without REPA 'exhibited severe alignment degradation.' Section 3.3.2 aligns h_DiT, h_MERT, and h_mHuBERT to a common length T' via interpolation/pooling without showing that phoneme-level timing survives this alignment. Please provide a quantitative ablation of REPA on/off (for example, Whisper forced-alignment confidence and SongEval coherence) and a diagnostic of temporal alignment accuracy for the SSL features.
  3. [Section 5.1, Figure 2] The blind human evaluation compares ACE-Step against Suno v3, Udio v1, and Hailuo but reports only mean scores; there is no statement of the number of stimuli per model, the number of trials per participant, per-dimension variances, confidence intervals, pairwise significance tests, or inter-rater reliability. The uniformly sub-15 Udio v1 scores across all four dimensions are implausible under a blind protocol and suggest possible handling errors or confounds such as truncated or corrupted samples. Please document the full protocol, including sample selection, randomization scheme, and statistical analysis, or remove the quantitative human-ranking claims.
  4. [Section 5.2.1, Table 1] The waveform reconstruction results show Music-DCAE is worse than DiffRhythm's 1D VAE on both FAD variants and on the CE, CU, PC, and PQ Audiobox dimensions (for example, FAD 0.0224 vs 0.0059), which the text acknowledges only as not surpassing the 'reconstruction quality upper bound.' Because DCAE is a core architectural component and the paper claims preservation of fine-grained acoustic details, this gap should be discussed quantitatively in relation to downstream generation quality, not only as a one-line caveat.
  5. [Section 5.2.3, Table 2] Generation speed is a headline result ('up to 4 minutes of music in just 20 seconds on an A100 GPU—15x faster than LLM-based baselines'), but Table 2 reports only RTF on an RTX 4090 for Yue, DiffRhythm, and ACE-Step, without specifying output duration, number of diffusion/ODE steps, solver, batch size, or whether the A100 and RTX 4090 numbers come from the same protocol. The abstract's '15x faster' is not traceable to the table, which reports about 188x relative speed versus Yue. Please provide the complete benchmarking setup and reconcile the abstract's factor.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1.4, first bullet] The sentence 'The Representation Alignment (REPA) framework (detailed in Section 2.4 became crucial' is missing a closing parenthesis; correct it to '(detailed in Section 2.4)'.
  2. [Sections 3.3.2 and 4] Section 3.3.2 defines L_SSL as an equal-weight average of two cosine similarities, but Section 4 states the mHuBERT component is reduced to 0.01 for the final 100,000 steps; state the exact final objective for reproducibility.
  3. [Section 5.2.2, Figure 3(b)] The note that the lyric-alignment metric 'might favor genres with sparse instrumentation' appears only parenthetically; this caveat should be discussed in the comparison because it can change the ranking interpretation.
  4. [Table 2] The RTF column mixes multiplicative labels ('0.083x', '10.03x') with a definition 'higher is faster'; clarify the units and define how the real-time factor is computed for each model.
  5. [Section 3.1.2 vs reference [45]] The text calls the model 'Qwen-omini' in Section 3.1.2, but reference [45] is the Qwen2.5-omni technical report; unify the name with the cited source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper's claims are empirical and externally benchmarked.

full rationale

ACE-Step is an empirical systems paper, and no load-bearing step in its presentation reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs. The core components are an architectural integration (Mel-DCAE plus a linear DiT), an auxiliary REPA-style semantic alignment loss, and evaluations against external baselines. The REPA loss is explicitly a training objective: L_SSL = 1/2(cosineSim(h'_DiT, h'_MERT) + cosineSim(h'_DiT, h'_mHuBERT)), where the target features come from frozen SSL models applied to clean audio. Lyric alignment is later measured with a different tool, Whisper forced alignment, so optimizing cosine similarity to MERT/mHuBERT does not by construction produce the reported evaluation score. Hyperparameters such as lambda_SSL = 1.0 and the later 0.01 mHuBERT weight are disclosed rather than hidden fitted values, and the generation-speed claim is benchmarked with RTF measurements. There are no self-citations in the reference list that carry the argument; Sana, DCAE, REPA, MERT, and mHuBERT are all external prior work. The abstract's wording 'state-of-the-art' and 'superior musical coherence and lyric alignment' is not supported by the paper's own Figures 3 and 4, where Udio and Hailuo rank above ACE-Step on style and Hailuo leads lyric alignment, but that is a correctness or evidence-consistency problem, not circularity. Likewise, the fact that StepFun organized the subjective evaluation is a conflict-of-interest concern, not a definitional reduction. The claimed derivation chain, such as it is, is empirical rather than formal, and no prediction is statistically forced from a fitted parameter. Overall, the manuscript does not exhibit self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard flow-matching math, on domain assumptions about the training data and SSL features, and on a small number of empirically chosen hyperparameters; no invented physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • lambda_SSL = 1.0 (mHuBERT component reduced to 0.01 in final 100k steps)
    Weight of the semantic alignment loss; empirically set, affects the trade-off between lyric adherence and musicality.
  • speaker embedding dropout = 50% during pretraining, omitted in finetuning
    Chosen to prevent over-reliance on timbre; affects controllability and voice cloning fidelity.
  • DCAE compression setting = f8c8, channel=8, ~10.77Hz latent
    Selected over f32c32 due to unacceptable quality degradation; determines latent resolution and reconstruction ceiling.
  • REPA feature layer = 8th layer out of 24
    Chosen for alignment; no ablation on layer choice is reported.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Flow matching linear probability paths produce samples from the target distribution when the vector field is well learned
    Relies on [29,40] without independent verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption MERT and mHuBERT features, after temporal interpolation/pooling, are meaningful semantic targets for musical and lyric content
    Load-bearing for the REPA loss; no analysis of how interpolation affects phoneme-level timing.
  • domain assumption The proprietary 100,000-hour dataset is representative of diverse music and its annotations are accurate for training
    Training quality depends on Whisper transcriptions, Qwen-omni captions, and LSH+IPA alignment, none of which are independently verifiable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BCQOOEJZ

@misc{pith2026250600045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BCQOOEJZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00045}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce ACE-Step, a novel open-source foundation model for music generation that overcomes key limitations of existing approaches and achieves state-of-the-art performance through a holistic architectural design. Current methods face inherent trade-offs between generation speed, musical coherence, and controllability. For example, LLM-based models (e.g. Yue, SongGen) excel at lyric alignment but suffer from slow inference and structural artifacts. Diffusion models (e.g. DiffRhythm), on the other hand, enable faster synthesis but often lack long-range structural coherence. ACE-Step bridges this gap by integrating diffusion-based generation with Sana's Deep Compression AutoEncoder (DCAE) and a lightweight linear transformer. It also leverages MERT and m-hubert to align semantic representations (REPA) during training, allowing rapid convergence. As a result, our model synthesizes up to 4 minutes of music in just 20 seconds on an A100 GPU-15x faster than LLM-based baselines-while achieving superior musical coherence and lyric alignment across melody, harmony, and rhythm metrics. Moreover, ACE-Step preserves fine-grained acoustic details, enabling advanced control mechanisms such as voice cloning, lyric editing, remixing, and track generation (e.g. lyric2vocal, singing2accompaniment). Rather than building yet another end-to-end text-to-music pipeline, our vision is to establish a foundation model for music AI: a fast, general-purpose, efficient yet flexible architecture that makes it easy to train subtasks on top of it. This paves the way for the development of powerful tools that seamlessly integrate into the creative workflows of music artists, producers, and content creators. In short, our goal is to build a stable diffusion moment for music. The code, the model weights and the demo are available at: https://ace-step.github.io/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00045 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ACE-Step Framework 3.2.2 Core Diffusion Model: Linear DiT The denoising network at the heart of ACE-Step is a Linear Diffusion Transformer (DiT). We adapt the Linear DiT structure from Sana [4] with two key modifications: • Simplified Adaptive Layer Normalization: We replace the standard AdaLN with AdaLN-single [54], where a single AdaLN layer’s parameters are shared across all DiT blocks. This significantly reduces… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Human evaluation results comparing ACE-Step against three baseline models (Hailuo, Suno v3, and Udio v1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of (a) Genre Scores and (b) Lyric Scores Across Models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of (a) Audiobox Aesthetics Metrics and (b) SongEval Musicality Metrics Across Models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An overview of the controllable features and specialized downstream applications of our model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MusicMark: A Robust Generative Watermarking Framework for Music Generation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Embedding watermark bits into diffusion semantic latents via a frozen-backbone adapter yields far more robust music provenance than post-hoc watermarking under codecs and cover-song attacks.

  2. SwanTale: Unified Multi-Speaker Speech and Audio Generation for Instruct and Zero-Shot Tasks

    eess.AS 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SwanTale unifies instruction-driven and zero-shot speech and audio generation in one 48 kHz model, with a large captioning pipeline, and reports leading scores on several expressiveness and instruction-following benchmarks.

  3. TORUS: A Test of Rendering-Understanding Self-Coherence for Unified Audio Models

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new audio benchmark, TORUS, shows unified audio models are not self-coherent: the best model answers 50.5% of questions about its own generations, below a 63.2% cascaded specialist baseline.

  4. MPEcho: A Melody and Phoneme-Aware Generative Framework for Controllable Cover Song Generation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding SVS-style phoneme conditioning and a length regulator to melody-guided cover generation cuts phoneme error rate from 45.6% to 18.7% while holding melody metrics.

  5. A Diagnostic Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Cover Songs Using Music-Theoretic and Acoustic Features

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI-generated covers most often fail on harmonic progression (53% severe) and arrangement (47%), while key consistency is better preserved; nine low-level features and a threshold rule could not reliably detect those failures.

  6. Genre Bias or Aesthetic Perception? Identifying and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Music Evaluation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SongEval's aesthetic scores are shortcut by genre (pop-centric), and a focal-loss plus group-regularized training objective measurably reduces that genre bias.

  7. Qwen-Music Technical Report

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Qwen-Music generates high-fidelity vocal songs via 25 Hz semantic tokens, Melody-CoT planning, and DiT rendering, claiming SOTA on 13/16 metrics and expert preference over proprietary systems.

  8. Anysynth:Zero-Shot Instrument Cloning via In-Context Learning and Asymmetric Hierarchical Guidance

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A zero-shot instrument cloning system feeds raw reference audio into a flow-matching DiT and uses asymmetric CFG to keep melody and timbre control separate.

  9. Cutting rules in strong field QED with application to trident pair production

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cutting rules for strong-field QED are formulated and used to relate higher-loop corrections to trident pair production, yielding a spin-resolved analytical rate expression in constant crossed fields.

  10. LaDA-Band: Language Diffusion Models for Vocal-to-Accompaniment Generation

    cs.SD 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LaDA-Band generates complete vocal-aligned instrumental accompaniments with discrete masked diffusion, claiming simultaneous gains in audio fidelity, long-range coherence, and orchestration quality.

  11. Echoes: A semantically-aligned music deepfake detection dataset

    cs.SD 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A semantically aligned, multi-provider music deepfake dataset is harder for detectors and trains models that transfer better than prior AI-music datasets.

  12. UniVerse-1: Unified Audio-Video Generation via Stitching of Experts

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified audio-video generator built by stitching pre-trained video and music diffusion models, trained on 7,600 hours of data, with a new evaluation benchmark.

  13. JAM: A Tiny Flow-based Song Generator with Fine-grained Controllability and Aesthetic Alignment

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JAM is a 530M-parameter flow-matching song generator that adds word- and phoneme-level timing control and duration control, achieving strong lyric fidelity and musicality scores when ground-truth timings are provided.

  14. Pushing the Frontier of Full-Song Generation: Hierarchical Autoregressive Planning Meets Flow-Matching Rendering

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified hierarchical-LM-plus-flow-matching system reports top-tier full-song vocal generation, ranking 2–3 on an external blind leaderboard, but releases neither code nor evaluation data.

  15. JoVA: Unified Multimodal Learning for Joint Video-Audio Generation and Editing

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual-branch diffusion transformer with joint video-audio self-attention and a keypoint-based mouth-area loss reports top lip-sync and speech metrics on two benchmarks.

  16. Towards Hallucination-Free Music: A Reinforcement Learning Preference Optimization Framework for Reliable Song Generation

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PER-based preference optimization (DPO, PPO, GRPO) reduces lyric-to-song hallucination in an audio language model, with the largest gains from DPO plus reject sampling.

  17. AudioGen-Omni: A Unified Multimodal Diffusion Transformer for Video-Synchronized Audio, Speech, and Song Generation

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single multimodal diffusion transformer generates video-synchronized general audio, speech, and song from flexible combinations of video, text, and lyrics inputs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Yue: Scaling open foundation models for long-form music generation, 2025

    Ruibin Yuan, Hanfeng Lin, Shuyue Guo, Ge Zhang, Jiahao Pan, Yongyi Zang, Haohe Liu, Yiming Liang, Wenye Ma, Xingjian Du, Xinrun Du, Zhen Ye, Tianyu Zheng, Zhengxuan Jiang, Yinghao Ma, Minghao Liu, Zeyue Tian, Ziya Zhou, Liumeng Xue, Xingwei Qu, Yizhi Li, Shangda Wu, Tianhao Shen, Ziyang Ma, Jun Zhan, Chunhui Wang, Yatian Wang, Xiaowei Chi, Xinyue Zhang, Z...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Songgen: A single stage auto-regressive transformer for text-to-song generation, 2025

    Zihan Liu, Shuangrui Ding, Zhixiong Zhang, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Yuhang Cao, Dahua Lin, and Jiaqi Wang. Songgen: A single stage auto-regressive transformer for text-to-song generation, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    DiffRhythm: Blazingly fast and embarrassingly simple end-to-end full-length song generation with latent diffusion

    Ning Ziqian, Chen Huakang, Jiang Yuepeng, Hao Chunbo, Ma Guobin, Wang Shuai, Yao Jixun, and Xie Lei. DiffRhythm: Blazingly fast and embarrassingly simple end-to-end full-length song generation with latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01183, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Sana: Efficient high-resolution image synthesis with linear diffusion transformer, 2024

    Enze Xie, Junsong Chen, Junyu Chen, Han Cai, Haotian Tang, Yujun Lin, Zhekai Zhang, Muyang Li, Ligeng Zhu, Yao Lu, and Song Han. Sana: Efficient high-resolution image synthesis with linear diffusion transformer, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Deep compression autoencoder for efficient high-resolution diffusion models

    Junyu Chen, Han Cai, Junsong Chen, Enze Xie, Shang Yang, Haotian Tang, Muyang Li, Yao Lu, and Song Han. Deep compression autoencoder for efficient high-resolution diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10733, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Mert: Acoustic music understanding model with large-scale self-supervised training, 2023

    Yizhi Li, Ruibin Yuan, Ge Zhang, Yinghao Ma, Xingran Chen, Hanzhi Yin, Chenghua Lin, Anton Ragni, Emmanouil Benetos, Norbert Gyenge, Roger Dannenberg, Ruibo Liu, Wenhu Chen, Gus Xia, Yemin Shi, Wenhao Huang, Yike Guo, and Jie Fu. Mert: Acoustic music understanding model with large-scale self-supervised training, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    mhubert-147: A compact multilingual hubert model

    Marcely Zanon Boito, Vivek Iyer, Nikolaos Lagos, Laurent Besacier, and Ioan Calapodescu. mhubert-147: A compact multilingual hubert model. In Interspeech 2024, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think

    Sihyun Yu, Sangkyung Kwak, Huiwon Jang, Jongheon Jeong, Jonathan Huang, Jinwoo Shin, and Saining Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, 2021

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Nee- lakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-V oss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Je...

    2020

  3. [11]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aurelien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language...

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Qwen technical report

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Luo Ji, Mei Li, Junyang Lin, Runji Lin, Dayiheng Liu, Gao Liu, Chengqiang Lu, Keming Lu, Jianxin Ma, Rui Men, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Chuanqi Tan, Si...

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Deepseek-v3 technical report, 2024

    DeepSeek-AI. Deepseek-v3 technical report, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Improving Image Generation with Better Captions

    James Betker, Gabriel Goh, Li Jing, Tim Brooks, Jianfeng Wang, Linjie Li, Long Ouyang, Juntang Zhuang, Joyce Lee, Yufei Guo, et al. Improving Image Generation with Better Captions. OpenAI, oct 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Black Forest Labs. Flux. https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux , 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Imagen 3

    Google DeepMind. Imagen 3. Google DeepMind Website, may 2024. 15 ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model

    2024

  9. [17]

    Video generation models as world simulators

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Holmes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Li Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luhman, Eric Luhman, Clarence Wing Yin Ng, Ricky Wang, and Aditya Ramesh. Video generation models as world simulators. OpenAI Research, feb 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Kling AI Video Generation Large Model

    Kuaishou Technology. Kling AI Video Generation Large Model. Kuaishou AI Website, jun 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, Jianyuan Zeng, Jiayu Wang, Jingfeng Zhang, Jingren Zhou, Jinkai Wang, Jixuan Chen, Kai Zhu, Kang Zhao, Keyu Yan, Lianghua Huang, Mengyang Feng, Ningyi Zhang, Pande...

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Jukebox: A generative model for music

    Prafulla Dhariwal, Heewoo Jun, Christine Payne, Jong Wook Kim, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. Jukebox: A generative model for music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00341, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Simple and controllable music generation, 2024

    Jade Copet, Felix Kreuk, Itai Gat, Tal Remez, David Kant, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, and Alexandre Défossez. Simple and controllable music generation, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    AudioLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models

    Haohe Liu, Zehua Chen, Yi Yuan, Xinhao Mei, Xubo Liu, Danilo Mandic, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D Plumbley. AudioLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 21450–21474, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Plumbley

    Haohe Liu, Yi Yuan, Xubo Liu, Xinhao Mei, Qiuqiang Kong, Qiao Tian, Yuping Wang, Wenwu Wang, Yuxuan Wang, and Mark D. Plumbley. Audioldm 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 32...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Suno: Ai music generation platform

    Suno AI. Suno: Ai music generation platform. https://suno.com, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Udio: Ai music creation platform

    Udio AI. Udio: Ai music creation platform. https://udio.com, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Riffusion: Stable diffusion for real-time music generation

    Seth Forsgren and Hayk Martiros. Riffusion: Stable diffusion for real-time music generation. https://github. com/riffusion/riffusion, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Parker, CJ Carr, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons

    Zach Evans, Julian D. Parker, CJ Carr, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons. Stable audio open, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Fast text-to-audio generation with adversarial post-training, 2025

    Zachary Novack, Zach Evans, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, CJ Carr, Julian Parker, Adnan Al-Sinan, Gian Marco Iodice, Julian McAuley, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Jordi Pons. Fast text-to-audio generation with adversarial post-training, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow

    Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Efficientvit: Multi-scale linear attention for high-resolution dense prediction, 2024

    Han Cai, Junyan Li, Muyan Hu, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. Efficientvit: Multi-scale linear attention for high-resolution dense prediction, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen

    Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models, 2023

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Statistical parametric speech synthesis, 2007

    Alan W Black, Heiga Zen, and Keiichi Tokuda. Statistical parametric speech synthesis, 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    Sparse alignment enhanced latent diffusion transformer for zero-shot speech synthesis

    Ziyue Jiang, Yi Ren, Ruiqi Li, Shengpeng Ji, Zhenhui Ye, Chen Zhang, Bai Jionghao, Xiaoda Yang, Jialong Zuo, Yu Zhang, et al. Sparse alignment enhanced latent diffusion transformer for zero-shot speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18924, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Neural discrete representation learning, 2018

    Aaron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Neural discrete representation learning, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Denk, Zalán Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, Matt Sharifi, Neil Zeghidour, and Christian Frank

    Andrea Agostinelli, Timo I. Denk, Zalán Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, Matt Sharifi, Neil Zeghidour, and Christian Frank. Musiclm: Generating music from text, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    High fidelity neural audio compression, 2022

    Alexandre Défossez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Yossi Adi. High fidelity neural audio compression, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Large- scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation

    Yusong Wu*, Ke Chen*, Tianyu Zhang*, Yuchen Hui*, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dubnov. Large- scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processin...

    2023

  31. [39]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1–67, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Yaron Lipman, Marton Havasi, Peter Holderrieth, Neta Shaul, Matt Le, Brian Karrer, Ricky T. Q. Chen, David Lopez-Paz, Heli Ben-Hamu, and Itai Gat. Flow matching guide and code, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers, 2023

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Meta audiobox aesthetics: Unified automatic quality assessment for speech, music, and sound

    Andros Tjandra, Yi-Chiao Wu, Baishan Guo, John Hoffman, Brian Ellis, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Sanyuan Chen, Matt Le, Nick Zacharov, Carleigh Wood, Ann Lee, and Wei-Ning Hsu. Meta audiobox aesthetics: Unified automatic quality assessment for speech, music, and sound. 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Qwen2.5-omni technical report

    Jin Xu, Zhifang Guo, Jinzheng He, Hangrui Hu, Ting He, Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Jialin Wang, Yang Fan, Kai Dang, Bin Zhang, Xiong Wang, Yunfei Chu, and Junyang Lin. Qwen2.5-omni technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20215, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision, 2022

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision, 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    ekzhu/datasketch: v1.6.5, May 2024

    Eric Zhu, Vadim Markovtsev, Aleksey Astafiev, Arham Khan, Chris Ha, Wojciech Łukasiewicz, Adam Foster, Sinusoidal36, Spandan Thakur, Stefano Ortolani, Titusz, V ojtech Letal, Zac Bentley, fpug, hguhlich, long2ice, oisincar, Ron Assa, Senad Ibraimoski, and Andrii Oriekhov. ekzh...

    2024

  40. [48]

    Byt5 model for massively multilingual grapheme-to-phoneme conversion

    Jian Zhu, Cong Zhang, and David Jurgens. Byt5 model for massively multilingual grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    All-in-one metrical and functional structure analysis with neighborhood attentions on demixed audio

    Taejun Kim and Juhan Nam. All-in-one metrical and functional structure analysis with neighborhood attentions on demixed audio. In IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA) , 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Beat this! accurate beat tracking without DBN postpro- cessing

    Francesco Foscarin, Jan Schlüter, and Gerhard Widmer. Beat this! accurate beat tracking without DBN postpro- cessing. In Proceedings of the 25th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) , San Francisco, CA, United States, November 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Essentia: An audio analysis library for music information retrieval

    Dmitry Bogdanov, Nicolas Wack, Emilia Gómez, Sankalp Gulati, Perfecto Herrera, Oscar Mayor, Gerard Roma, Justin Salamon, José Zapata, and Xavier Serra. Essentia: An audio analysis library for music information retrieval. International Society for Music Information Retrieval Co...

    2013

  44. [52]

    Xtts: a massively multilingual zero-shot text-to-speech model, 2024

    Edresson Casanova, Kelly Davis, Eren Gölge, Görkem Göknar, Iulian Gulea, Logan Hart, Aya Aljafari, Joshua Meyer, Reuben Morais, Samuel Olayemi, and Julian Weber. Xtts: a massively multilingual zero-shot text-to-speech model, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Fish-speech: Leveraging large language models for advanced multilingual text-to-speech synthesis, 2024

    Shijia Liao, Yuxuan Wang, Tianyu Li, Yifan Cheng, Ruoyi Zhang, Rongzhi Zhou, and Yijin Xing. Fish-speech: Leveraging large language models for advanced multilingual text-to-speech synthesis, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Pixart-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023

    Junsong Chen, Jincheng Yu, Chongjian Ge, Lewei Yao, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Zhongdao Wang, James Kwok, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, and Zhenguo Li. Pixart-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Unimax: Fairer and more effective language sampling for large-scale multilingual pretraining, 2023

    Hyung Won Chung, Noah Constant, Xavier Garcia, Adam Roberts, Yi Tay, Sharan Narang, and Orhan Firat. Unimax: Fairer and more effective language sampling for large-scale multilingual pretraining, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    Learning diverse features with part-level resolution for person re-identification, 2020

    Ben Xie, Xiaofu Wu, Suofei Zhang, Shiliang Zhao, and Ming Li. Learning diverse features with part-level resolution for person re-identification, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis, 2024

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, Dustin Podell, Tim Dockhorn, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Alex Goodwin, Yannik Marek, and Robin Rombach. Scaling rectified flow transf...

    2024

  50. [58]

    Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation

    Hannes Gamper Azalea Gui, Sebastian Braun, and Dimitra Emmanouilidou. Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation. In Proc. IEEE ICASSP 2024, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Stable Audio Metrics, 2024

    Stability AI. Stable Audio Metrics, 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    Muq: Self-supervised music representation learning with mel residual vector quantization

    Haina Zhu, Yizhi Zhou, Hangting Chen, Jianwei Yu, Ziyang Ma, Rongzhi Gu, Yi Luo, Wei Tan, and Xie Chen. Muq: Self-supervised music representation learning with mel residual vector quantization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01108, 2025. 17 ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation...

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    stable-ts: Stabilizing Timestamps for Whisper, 2024

    Jian. stable-ts: Stabilizing Timestamps for Whisper, 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Songeval: A benchmark dataset for song aesthetics evaluation

    Jixun Yao, Guobin Ma, Huixin Xue, Huakang Chen, Chunbo Hao, Yuepeng Jiang, Haohe Liu, Ruibin Yuan, Jin Xu, Wei Xue, et al. Songeval: A benchmark dataset for song aesthetics evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10793, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Simplifying, stabilizing and scaling continuous-time consistency models, 2025

    Cheng Lu and Yang Song. Simplifying, stabilizing and scaling continuous-time consistency models, 2025

    2025

  56. [64]

    Flowedit: Inversion-free text-based editing using pre-trained flow models

    Vladimir Kulikov, Matan Kleiner, Inbar Huberman-Spiegelglas, and Tomer Michaeli. Flowedit: Inversion-free text-based editing using pre-trained flow models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08629, 2024. 18 ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model A Training Details T...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.