Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 68 references

BTPD: A Multilingual Hand-curated Dataset of Bengali Transnational Political Discourse Across Online Communities

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper presents BTPD, a hand-curated multilingual dataset of 2,235 Bengali political posts from Reddit, Politics Stack Exchange, and Bengali Quora, with each post translated into Bengali and English to support research on transnational…

desk verdict A useful new resource for an under-resourced language, with a real but fixable arithmetic inconsistency and an unmeasured curation step. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06813 v1 pith:L347NJ3G submitted 2025-06-07 cs.CL cs.CYcs.HC

Dipto Das , Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed , Shion Guha This is my paper
classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.HC
keywords BengalipoliticaldiscoursemultilingualdatasetonlinecommunitiesRedditPoliticsStackExchangeQuorahand-curatedcorpustransnational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Political discourse research online has mostly focused on English, leaving Bengali—a major global language—under-resourced. This paper introduces BTPD, a hand-curated dataset of 2,235 political posts collected from Reddit, Politics Stack Exchange, and Bengali Quora, three communities with different interaction styles. Each post is paired with manually verified Bengali and English translations, so the corpus is bilingual by construction. The authors argue that this resource fills a gap in studying transnational Bengali political discourse that spans Bangladesh and Indian Bengali communities.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the hand-curated, platform-specific retrieval pipeline rather than a single algorithmic filter. Reddit posts are selected through subreddit membership plus flairs such as 'Politics/রাজনীিত', 'Discussion/আলোচনা', and 'News/সংবাদ'; Politics Stack Exchange posts are found by matching keywords like Bangladesh, West Bengal, Dhaka, Kolkata, and Bengali in titles, bodies, or tags, followed by manual relevance reading; Bengali Quora threads are found via topic keywords that came from a community survey. After collection, a commercial machine-translation service produced Bengali and English versions of every post, and the authors, as native Bengali speakers, manually checked and corrected the translations. The pipeline also includes a topic-modeling pass using non-negative matrix factorization on the English translations to summarize the corpus's themes.

What would settle it

Have independent annotators re-apply the paper's inclusion rules to a random sample of posts and measure agreement; if inter-annotator agreement is low (for example, kappa below 0.6), the curation filter is not stable enough to reproduce the dataset. Alternatively, check whether a random sample of posts carrying the Reddit 'Discussion' flair are mostly political: since the paper reports the flair mixes topics, a majority of non-political posts under that flair would show the flair-based filter over-collects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a community-informed, keyword-based retrieval pipeline can assemble a multilingual dataset of Bengali transnational political discourse from platforms with different governance and interaction structures. For Reddit, the authors selected politics- and region-focused subreddits and filtered posts by flair; for Politics Stack Exchange, they keyword-searched the full data dump and then manually read each candidate post to retain only those truly engaged with Bengali politics; for Bengali Quora, they derived topic keywords from a survey of community members and used those to collect question-answer threads. The result is 2,235 unique posts, each with original text plus Bengali and English translations, and a descriptive topic overview from non-negative matrix factorization. If this is right, BTPD provides a reusable, cross-platform resource that captures how Bengali political talk actually happens online.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline's filter for what counts as 'Bengali political discourse' depends on per-platform signals (flairs, keyword hits) plus the authors' own manual judgment, and the paper itself notes that flair usage varies by subreddit and that the 'Discussion' flair is used for both political and non-political posts; if two careful readers would not reliably agree on what should be included, the dataset's claimed coverage is not reproducible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With timestamps spanning Reddit (2023–2025) and Politics Stack Exchange (2012–2024), the dataset supports longitudinal studies of how Bengali political topics change over time.
  • Because every post has parallel Bengali and English versions, researchers can study code-switching and Romanized Bengali, or compare how political content is expressed in the two languages.
  • The three-platform design makes it possible to compare discussion dynamics between community-oriented Reddit, Q&A-oriented Politics Stack Exchange, and the intermediate Bengali Quora.
  • The dataset can serve as a testbed for auditing political and identity-based biases in Bengali NLP systems, such as content moderation and large language models, as the conclusion suggests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The aligned Bengali-English pairs also make BTPD usable as a bilingual parallel corpus for political text, a use the paper does not itself emphasize.
  • The descriptive topic overview leaves open a comparative test the dataset enables: whether community structure measurably shapes topic emphasis or language choice across the three platforms.
  • Because the Bengali Quora keywords came from a 2024 survey, the dataset captures a snapshot of that moment; re-running the survey after major political events could test how quickly topic priorities shift.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces BTPD, a multilingual dataset of Bengali transnational political discourse collected from three online platforms: five Reddit subreddits, Politics Stack Exchange, and Bengali Quora. The curation method combines community-informed keyword retrieval, platform-specific flairs, and manual relevance screening, followed by GPT-4-based translation into Bengali and English with manual verification. The paper reports descriptive statistics, PCA-based comparison of the two language versions, and an NMF-based topic overview. It claims a total of 2,235 posts with original text and translations, and positions the dataset as a resource for studying cross-platform political discourse in Bengali communities across Bangladesh and India.

Significance. If released and validated, BTPD would address a real and timely gap: computational social science and NLP resources for Bengali political discourse are scarce, and most existing Bengali datasets are single-platform or nationality-framed. The paper's strengths are its community-informed keyword design, its deliberate choice of three platforms with different community structures, and its bilingual translation pipeline with manual verification. However, the dataset is not currently available, the manual relevance screening has no measured reliability, and the reported total contradicts the sum of the per-platform counts. These issues must be resolved before the contribution can be evaluated; the paper's significance therefore depends on the revisions described below.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Tables 1–3] The abstract and Section 3.3 state that the dataset contains 2,235 posts, but the numbers in Tables 1, 2, and 3 sum to 1,220 + 255 + 876 = 2,351, a discrepancy of 116 posts. The only deduplication step described is for PoliticsSE ('only retained the unique posts'), so the mismatch is unexplained. Please reconcile the total, report the exact deduplication procedure, and provide a per-platform breakdown that sums consistently; as written, this inconsistency undermines the reproducibility of the dataset's composition.
  2. [Sections 3.2.1–3.2.3] The dataset's central claim is that it contains Bengali transnational political discourse, but the inclusion decisions rest on the authors' unmeasured manual screening. Section 3.2.1 acknowledges that the 'Discussion/আলোচনা' flair is used for both political and non-political posts and that flair usage varies across subreddits; Section 3.2.2 describes manual reading to exclude posts that mention Bangladesh only as a passing example; Section 3.2.3 uses a survey-derived topic list. No inter-rater reliability, precision estimates, or audit of the screening decisions are reported. Please report a reliability study (e.g., Cohen's kappa on a random sample scored by multiple annotators), per-platform precision or exclusion rates, and a clear inclusion/exclusion protocol.
  3. [Footnote 1 and Section 3.3] The paper's contribution is a dataset, yet the dataset is only 'publicly available upon the paper's acceptance' and no data samples, schema, or collection code are provided in the manuscript. This makes it impossible for reviewers or readers to verify the reported counts, translations, or curation decisions. Please include an anonymized sample of records, a detailed data schema, and the scraping/translation code, or clearly state the ethical and legal constraints that prevent release together with a way for reviewers to access a private copy.
  4. [Section 3.2.3] The BnQuora component is selected using a list of key topics derived from 74 survey responses circulated through the authors' social networks and student organizations at two North American universities. The paper treats this convenience sample as capturing 'key topics' of contemporary Bengali political discourse, but no demographics, response rate, or validation of the survey instrument are provided. Since this list determines the topical scope of the BnQuora subset, please either justify its representativeness with additional evidence or reframe the BnQuora component as an exploratory, non-exhaustive collection.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Running header] The running header reads 'B engali Transnational Political Discourse'; the space in 'B engali' should be removed.
  2. [Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.3] Several Bengali strings appear to contain OCR or transcription errors: 'রাজনীিত' should likely be 'রাজনীতি', 'আেলাচনা' should be 'আলোচনা', and 'পরামশ�' should be 'পরামর্শ'. Please verify all Bengali text for typographical correctness.
  3. [Section 3.3] The TF-IDF expansion is given as 'Term Frequency-Inverse Dense Frequency'; the standard term is 'Inverse Document Frequency'. Please correct this.
  4. [Table 4] The 'Earliest and latest posts' column for BnQuora lists '5 years ago' instead of an actual date, which is inconsistent with the other two platforms and not reproducible. Please provide a concrete date or a timestamp retrieval criterion.
  5. [Section 4 and Table 5] Several NMF topic words (e.g., Awami-League, West-Bengal, secularism, constitution) are identical to the retrieval keywords in Tables 2 and 3, so the topic overview partly reflects the selection process. The claim that NMF 'surfaced more important keywords' needs support, for example by comparing the topic model on held-out posts or by showing that the topics persist when retrieval keywords are removed. Please add such an analysis or soften the claim.
  6. [Section 4, Figure 1(b)] The wordcloud explanation is unclear. The paper states that existing NLP tools could not visualize the Bengali wordcloud properly, but then presents a wordcloud of English translations; please clarify how the figure was generated and what it is intended to show.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper constructs a hand-curated dataset and gives a descriptive overview; no prediction or result reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This paper does not derive a model or make predictions; it reports a dataset and a descriptive overview. The curation pipeline (Sections 3.2.1–3.2.3) uses platform-specific flairs, keyword searches, and manual relevance screening. None of these steps is defined in terms of the output: the dataset's posts are collected, not fitted, and the claimed contribution—a bilingual corpus of 2,235 posts—is a constructed artifact rather than a quantity predicted from its own definition. The topic modeling in Section 4 is explicitly descriptive ('we provide a brief descriptive overview of our developed dataset'), and the paper itself notes that some NMF top words coincide with search keywords; this is an acknowledged echo of the retrieval vocabulary, not a derivation, and does not make the dataset claim circular. Self-citations to the authors' prior work ([19], [20], [21]) are used to motivate platform choices and general data-collection practices, but the actual platform selection and manual curation are independently described and verifiable from the reported data. The paper also contains a count inconsistency (2,235 total vs. 2,351 from Tables 1–3) and reports unmeasured manual screening; these are accuracy and transparency concerns, not circularity. I find no step in which a claimed result reduces to its input by construction or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The dataset content is determined by author-chosen filters: subreddit flairs, keyword lists, a convenience-survey-derived topic list, and manual relevance screening. These choices are not free mathematical parameters, but they function as selection parameters for the corpus. The paper also relies on the validity of Bruckman's community framework for platform choice, on GPT-4 translation quality after manual review, and on the meaningfulness of NMF topics computed from English translations. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • BnQuora topic keyword list = 10 themes from 74 survey responses (foreign policy, secularism, women's rights, etc.)
    The composition of the Bengali Quora portion of BTPD is determined by this hand-chosen keyword set, derived from a convenience-sample survey circulated through the authors' networks (Section 3.2.3).
  • Reddit political flair set = Politics/রাজনীিত, Discussion/আলোচনা, News/সংবাদ
    These three flairs are the inclusion filter for all Reddit subreddits, even though the paper reports that flair usage is inconsistent across subreddits (Section 3.2.1).
  • Number of NMF topics = 10
    The topic overview in Table 5 fixes k=10 with no sensitivity analysis, so the descriptive topic structure is partly an artifact of this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bruckman's prototype-based category is a valid way to treat online communities.
    Used in Section 3.1 to justify selecting Reddit, PoliticsSE, and BnQuora as platforms with differing community prototypicality.
  • domain assumption Flair-based filtering plus manual review reliably isolates political content on Reddit.
    Used in Section 3.2.1; the paper itself notes inconsistent flair use across subreddits, so this premise is fragile.
  • domain assumption Keyword matching on PoliticsSE followed by manual reading identifies Bengali-relevant political posts.
    Used in Section 3.2.2; manual relevance screening is subjective and its reliability is not reported.
  • ad hoc to paper The 74-response survey captures the key topics of contemporary Bengali political discourse.
    Used in Section 3.2.3 to generate the ten BnQuora search themes; the survey is a convenience sample circulated through the authors' social networks and North American student organizations.
  • domain assumption GPT-4 translations, after manual verification by native speakers, provide reliable Bengali and English versions.
    Used in Section 3.3; no translation quality metrics, examples of corrected output, or inter-annotator agreement are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BTPD: A Multilingual Hand-curated Dataset of Bengali Transnational Political Discourse Across Online Communities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L347NJ3G

@misc{pith2026250606813,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BTPD: A Multilingual Hand-curated Dataset of Bengali Transnational Political Discourse Across Online Communities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L347NJ3G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06813}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding political discourse in online spaces is crucial for analyzing public opinion and ideological polarization. While social computing and computational linguistics have explored such discussions in English, such research efforts are significantly limited in major yet under-resourced languages like Bengali due to the unavailability of datasets. In this paper, we present a multilingual dataset of Bengali transnational political discourse (BTPD) collected from three online platforms, each representing distinct community structures and interaction dynamics. Besides describing how we hand-curated the dataset through community-informed keyword-based retrieval, this paper also provides a general overview of its topics and multilingual content.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06813 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Scree plots of principal component analysis of Bengali (in red) and English (in blue) versions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Morsheda Akhter and Philip Q Yang. 2023. The Bangladeshi Diaspora in the United States: History and Portrait. Genealogy 7, 4 (2023), 81

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Ashlyn Anderson and Alyssa Ayres. 2015. Economics of Influence: China and India in South Asia. https://www.cfr. org/expert-brief/economics-influence-china-and-india-south-asia. Last accessed: 27-03-2025

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    2022.Human-centered data science: an introduction

    Cecilia Aragon, Shion Guha, Marina Kogan, Michael Muller, and Gina Neff. 2022.Human-centered data science: an introduction. MIT Press

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    World Atlas. 2022. Who are the Bengali People? https://www.worldatlas.com/society/the-10-most-spoken-languages- in-the-world.html. Last accessed: March 21, 2025

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    LiaBozarth,JaneIm,ChristopherQuarles,andCerenBudak.2023. WisdomofTwoCrowds: MisinformationModeration on Reddit and How to Improve this Process—A Case Study of COVID-19.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–33

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Amy Bruckman. 2006. A new perspective on” community” and its implications for computer-mediated communication systems. InCHI’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 616–621

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Pete Burnap, Rachel Gibson, Luke Sloan, Rosalynd Southern, and Matthew Williams. 2016. 140 characters to victory?: Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 General Election.Electoral Studies41 (2016), 230–233

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Statistics Canada. 2021. Census of Population. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/ details/page.cfm. Accessed: 17-02-2025

    work page 2021

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Dipesh Chakrabarty. 2009. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference-New edition. (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    1993.The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories

    Partha Chatterjee. 1993.The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Vol. 4. Princeton University Press

    1993

  3. [11]

    2002.Bengal divided: Hindu communalism and partition, 1932-1947

    Joya Chatterji. 2002.Bengal divided: Hindu communalism and partition, 1932-1947. Number 57. Cambridge University Press

    2002

  4. [12]

    Emily Chen, Ashok Deb, and Emilio Ferrara. 2022. # Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.Journal of Computational Social Science(2022), 1–18

    2022

  5. [13]

    Lomat Haider Chowdhury, Salekul Islam, and Swakkhar Shatabda. 2024. A Bengali news and public opinion dataset from YouTube.Data in Brief52 (2024), 109938

    2024

  6. [14]

    Isobelle Clarke and Jack Grieve. 2019. Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018.PloS one14, 9 (2019), e0222062

    2019

  7. [15]

    Dipto Das, Dhwani Gandhi, and Bryan Semaan. 2024. Reimagining Communities through Transnational Bengali Decolonial Discourse with YouTube Content Creators.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8, CSCW2 (2024), 1–36

    2024

  8. [16]

    Colonial Impulse

    Dipto Das, Shion Guha, Jed R Brubaker, and Bryan Semaan. 2024. The“Colonial Impulse” of Natural Language Processing: An Audit of Bengali Sentiment Analysis Tools and Their Identity-based Biases. InProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18

    2024

  9. [17]

    Dipto Das, Shion Guha, and Bryan Semaan. 2023. Toward cultural bias evaluation datasets: The case of Bengali gender, religious, and national identity. InProceedings of the First Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP). 68–83

    2023

  10. [18]

    Dipto Das, AKM Najmul Islam, SM Taiabul Haque, Jukka Vuorinen, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2022. Understanding the Strategies and Practices of Facebook Microcelebrities for Engaging in Sociopolitical Discourses. InProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Information a...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Dipto Das, Carsten Østerlund, and Bryan Semaan. 2021. ” Jol” or” Pani”?: How Does Governance Shape a Platform’s Identity? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–25

    2021

  12. [20]

    Dipto Das, Arpon Podder, and Bryan Semaan. 2022. Note: A sociomaterial perspective on trace data collection: Strategies for democratizing and limiting bias. InProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 569–573

    2022

  13. [21]

    Dipto Das and Bryan Semaan. 2022. Collaborative identity decolonization as reclaiming narrative agency: Identity work of Bengali communities on Quora. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–23

    2022

  14. [22]

    Mithun Das and Animesh Mukherjee. 2023. Banglaabusememe: A dataset for bengali abusive meme classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11748(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Maryam Davoodi, Eric Waltenburg, and Dan Goldwasser. 2020. Understanding the language of political agreement and disagreement in legislative texts. InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5358–5368

    2020

  16. [24]

    Roman Egger and Joanne Yu. 2022. A topic modeling comparison between lda, nmf, top2vec, and bertopic to demystify twitter posts.Frontiers in sociology7 (2022), 886498. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2018. 8 Dipto Das, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Shion Guha

    2022

  17. [25]

    Asno Azzawagama Firdaus, Anton Yudhana, Imam Riadi, et al. 2024. Indonesian presidential election sentiment: Dataset of response public before 2024.Data in Brief52 (2024), 109993

    2024

  18. [26]

    Adabriand Furtado, Nazareno Andrade, Nigini Oliveira, and Francisco Brasileiro. 2013. Contributor profiles, their dynamics, andtheirimportanceinfiveq&asites.In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1237–1252

    2013

  19. [27]

    Kristalina Georgieva. 2023. Bangladesh and its Partners are Launching the Bangladesh Climate and Development Platform to Leverage Adaptation and Mitigation Investments. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2023/12/03/ bangladesh-launch-climate-development-platform-to-leverage-...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Sarah A Gilbert. 2020. ” I run the world’s largest historical outreach project and it’s on a cesspool of a website.” Moderating a Public Scholarship Site on Reddit: A Case Study of r/AskHistorians.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4, CSCW1 (2020), 1–27

    2020

  21. [29]

    Astha Goyal and Indu Kashyap. 2023. Comprehensive Analysis of Topic Models for Short and Long Text Data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications14, 12 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Mahmud Hasan, Labiba Islam, Ismat Jahan, Sabrina Mannan Meem, and Rashedur M Rahman. 2023. Natural language processing and sentiment analysis on bangla social media comments on russia–ukraine war using transformers. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science10, 03 (2023), 329–356

    2023

  23. [31]

    Tahmid Hasan, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Kazi Samin, Masum Hasan, Madhusudan Basak, M Sohel Rahman, and Rifat Shahriyar. 2020. Not low-resource anymore: Aligner ensembling, batch filtering, and new datasets for Bengali-English machine translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09359(2020)

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Libby Hemphill, Jahna Otterbacher, and Matthew Shapiro. 2013. What’s congress doing on twitter?. InProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 877–886

    2013

  25. [33]

    Brian Heredia, Joseph D Prusa, and Taghi M Khoshgoftaar. 2018. Location-based twitter sentiment analysis for predicting the US 2016 presidential election. InThe Thirty-First International Flairs Conference

    2018

  26. [34]

    TunazzinaIslam, Shamik Roy, and Dan Goldwasser. 2023. Weaklysupervised learning for analyzing political campaigns on facebook. InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 411–422

    2023

  27. [35]

    Sou Hyun Jang, Sangpil Youm, and Yong Jeong Yi. 2023. Anti-Asian discourse in Quora: Comparison of before and during the COVID-19 pandemic with machine-and deep-learning approaches.Race and Justice13, 1 (2023), 55–79

    2023

  28. [36]

    Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Ali Memariani, and Shion Guha. 2023. The principles of data-centric ai.Commun. ACM 66, 8 (2023), 84–92

    2023

  29. [37]

    Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang, Xing Wang, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu. 2023. Is ChatGPT a good translator? Yes with GPT-4 as the engine.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08745(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Zhiwei Jin, Juan Cao, Han Guo, Yongdong Zhang, Yu Wang, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Detection and analysis of 2016 us presidential election related rumors on twitter. InSocial, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: 10th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2017, Washington, DC, USA, July...

    2017

  31. [39]

    all I know about politics is what I read in twitter

    Kristen Johnson and Dan Goldwasser. 2016. “all I know about politics is what I read in twitter”: Weakly supervised models for extracting politicians’ stances from twitter. InProceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th international conference on computational linguistics: technical p...

    2016

  32. [40]

    Pratik Joshi, Sebastin Santy, Amar Budhiraja, Kalika Bali, and Monojit Choudhury. 2020. The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World. InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Cha...

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Jaehong Kim, Chaeyoon Jeong, Seongchan Park, Meeyoung Cha, and Wonjae Lee. 2024. How Do Moral Emotions Shape Political Participation? A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Online Petitions Using Language Models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. 16274–16289

    2024

  34. [42]

    James Lane. 2023. The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World. https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/the-10-most- spoken-languages-in-the-world. Last accessed: Feb 26, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Chang Li and Dan Goldwasser. 2021. Using social and linguistic information to adapt pretrained representations for political perspective identification. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. 4569–4579

    2021

  36. [44]

    Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau, Klaus Opwis, and Katharina Reinecke. 2021. How weird is CHI?. InProceedings of the 2021 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14

    2021

  37. [45]

    Michael Liu and Kim Geron. 2008. Changing neighborhood: Ethnic enclaves and the struggle for social justice.Social Justice 35, 2 (112 (2008), 18–35

    2008

  38. [46]

    Ruibo Liu, Chenyan Jia, Jason Wei, Guangxuan Xu, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2022. Quantifying and alleviating political bias in language models.Artificial Intelligence304 (2022), 103654. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2018. BTPD: Dataset of Bengali Transnational ...

    2022

  39. [47]

    Adenike Tosin Odegbile and Olufemi Moses Oyelami. 2024. A dataset of the 2023 presidential election in Nigeria.Data in Brief 57 (2024), 110847

    2024

  40. [48]

    Lucas Oliveira, Pedro Vaz de Melo, Marcelo Amaral, and José Antônio Pinho. 2018. When politicians talk about politics: Identifying political tweets of Brazilian congressmen. InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 12

    2018

  41. [49]

    Helene Olsen, Étienne Simon, Erik Velldal, and Lilja Øvrelid. 2024. Socio-political events of conflict and unrest: A survey of available datasets. InProceedings of the 7th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE...

    2024

  42. [50]

    Joyojeet Pal and Anmol Panda. 2019. Twitter in the 2019 Indian general elections: Trends of use across states and parties. Economic and Political Weekly54, 51 (2019), 1–17

    2019

  43. [51]

    Anmol Panda, A’ndre Gonawela, Sreangsu Acharyya, Dibyendu Mishra, Mugdha Mohapatra, Ramgopal Chan- drasekaran, and Joyojeet Pal. 2020. Nivaduck-a scalable pipeline to build a database of political twitter handles for india and the united states. InInternational Conference on S...

    2020

  44. [52]

    Sumanth Patil and Kyumin Lee. 2016. Detecting experts on Quora: by their activity, quality of answers, linguistic characteristics and temporal behaviors.Social network analysis and mining6 (2016), 1–11

    2016

  45. [53]

    Sharoda A Paul, Lichan Hong, and Ed H Chi. 2012. Who is authoritative? understanding reputation mechanisms in quora. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.3724(2012)

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Nauros Romim, Mosahed Ahmed, Hriteshwar Talukder, and Md Saiful Islam. 2021. Hate speech detection in the bengali language: A dataset and its baseline evaluation. InProceedings of International Joint Conference on Advances in Computational Intelligence: IJCACI 2020. Springer, 457–468

    2021

  47. [55]

    Tiago Santos, Simon Walk, Roman Kern, Markus Strohmaier, and Denis Helic. 2019. Activity archetypes in question- and-answer (q8a) websites—a study of 50 stack exchange instances.ACM Transactions on Social Computing2, 1 (2019), 1–23

    2019

  48. [56]

    Salim Sazzed. 2020. Cross-lingual sentiment classification in low-resource Bengali language. InProceedings of the sixth workshop on noisy user-generated text (W-NUT 2020). 50–60

    2020

  49. [57]

    2018.The decline of the caste question: Jogendranath Mandal and the defeat of Dalit politics in Bengal

    Dwaipayan Sen. 2018.The decline of the caste question: Jogendranath Mandal and the defeat of Dalit politics in Bengal. Cambridge University Press

    2018

  50. [58]

    Ali Akbar Septiandri, Marios Constantinides, Mohammad Tahaei, and Daniele Quercia. 2023. WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 160–171

    2023

  51. [59]

    Vinay Setty and Erlend Rekve. 2020. Truth be told: Fake news detection using user reactions on reddit. InProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3325–3328

    2020

  52. [60]

    Md Shihab Shahriar, Ahmad Al Fayad Chowdhury, Md Amimul Ehsan, and Abu Raihan Kamal. 2023. Question Answer Generation in Bengali: Mitigating the scarcity of QA datasets in a low-resource language. InProceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Pro...

    2023

  53. [61]

    Yuya Shibuya, Andrea Hamm, and Teresa Cerratto Pargman. 2022. Mapping HCI research methods for studying social media interaction: A systematic literature review.Computers in Human Behavior129 (2022), 107131

    2022

  54. [62]

    Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. InProceedings of the acm 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 7–16

    2012

  55. [63]

    2005.Do migrants transfer tacit knowledge?: the case of highly skilled Bangladeshi immigrants in the United States

    Moshahida Sultana. 2005.Do migrants transfer tacit knowledge?: the case of highly skilled Bangladeshi immigrants in the United States. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    2005

  56. [64]

    David Q Sun, Artem Abzaliev, Hadas Kotek, Zidi Xiu, Christopher Klein, and Jason D Williams. 2023. DELPHI: Data for Evaluating LLMs’ Performance in Handling Controversial Issues.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18130(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Joshua A Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political polarization, and poli...

    2018

  58. [66]

    Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Marisa Duarte, Nicholet Deschine Parkhurst, and Elizabeth Belding. 2017. # indigenous: tracking the connective actions of native American advocates on twitter. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social comput...

    2017

  59. [67]

    Gang Wang, Konark Gill, Manish Mohanlal, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y Zhao. 2013. Wisdom in the social crowd: an analysis of quora. InProceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. 1341–1352

    2013

  60. [68]

    Galen Weld, Amy X Zhang, and Tim Althoff. 2024. Making online communities ‘better’: a taxonomy of community values on reddit. InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 18. 1611–1633. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2018

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.