Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 119 references

Moir\'eXNet: Adaptive Multi-Scale Demoir\'eing with Linear Attention Test-Time Training and Truncated Flow Matching Prior

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read MoiréXNet claims a new state of the art for RAW image and video demoiréing, reaching 30.214 dB PSNR on RawVDemoire video by combining linear-attention test-time training with a truncated flow-matching refinement.

desk verdict A promising base model for RAW demoireing, undermined by an unverifiable refinement stage and internal numerical contradictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15929 v1 pith:HVNQLZOX submitted 2025-06-19 cs.CV cs.AIeess.IV

Liangyan Li , Yimo Ning , Kevin Le , Wei Dong , Yunzhe Li , Jun Chen , Xiaohong Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIeess.IV
keywords moirepatternremovalRAW-to-sRGBdemoiréingtest-timetraininglinearattentionflowmatchingpriorvideorestorationfrequencydomainfilteringinvertibleneuralnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes MoiréXNet, a hybrid demoiréing system that removes moiré patterns directly from RAW camera data and outputs clean sRGB images. Its central claim is that combining a fast supervised network built on linear-attention test-time training with a truncated flow matching prior yields better restoration than either approach alone, because moiré degradation is nonlinear and does not fit the linear forward models most generative restoration assumes. On the RawVDemoire benchmark the paper reports 29.590 dB PSNR for images and 30.127 dB for video, rising to 30.214 dB after the flow matching refinement, with inference at 0.070 seconds per frame. A sympathetic reader would care because the method addresses both quality and speed for a practical capture artifact, and because the same hybrid could extend to other nonlinear degradations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the MAP-style marriage of two components. The first is a supervised RAW-to-sRGB network whose deep feature extractor stacks linear-attention TTT blocks, each maintaining a compact parametric hidden state updated as $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t; W)$, so memory stays fixed instead of growing with sequence length; before these blocks, an invertible neural network preserves information losslessly and a learnable frequency enhanced filter reweights low- and high-frequency components. The second component is the Truncated Flow Matching Prior, a generative velocity field $\partial x_t/\partial t = v(x_t,t)$ learned to map degraded images to clean ones, applied only near the clean end of the trajectory by setting $x_t$ to the supervised output and integrating $x_{t-1} = x_t + \Delta t\, v(x_t,t)$ from $t=0.95$ for a few iterations. Multi-scale features, pyramid cascading deformable alignment for video, and multiscale reconstruction losses tie the stages together.

What would settle it

Re-run MoiréXNet on RawVDemoire with the reported t=0.95 and 15 refinement iterations, and record PSNR and LPIPS before and after flow matching; the table lists TFMP LPIPS as 0.0973 while the text claims 0.0795, so resolving this discrepancy and testing several independent velocity fields would show whether the refinement actually improves perceptual quality or merely shifts pixel metrics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MoiréXNet claims to establish a new benchmark for RAW image and video demoiréing. The supervised stage maps three neighboring RAW frames directly to the sRGB central frame using multi-scale features, invertible lossless transforms, a learnable frequency filter, and TTT linear attention blocks; it alone beats prior RAW and sRGB methods on RawVDemoire in PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, and inference speed. The truncated flow matching prior then integrates a pretrained velocity field for about 15 steps from t = 0.95 rather than t = 1, nudging the supervised output toward the clean image distribution and adding roughly 0.09 dB PSNR. The paper also reports competitive results on the TMM22 RAW image dataset, where MoiréXNet matches or slightly trails the strongest Mamba-based rival on PSNR while improving LPIPS.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a pretrained flow-matching velocity field, whose training data, architecture, and checkpoint the paper never states, maps MoiréXNet's outputs on the test distribution toward clean images when integrated from t=0.95; if that field was trained on different degradations, the claimed 0.09 dB refinement gain could disappear or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On RawVDemoire, MoiréXNet reports image demoiréing at 29.590 dB PSNR, video demoiréing at 30.127 dB PSNR, and video SSIM of 0.9258, all above the listed baselines and at 0.070 seconds per frame.
  • Adding the truncated flow matching prior raises the video numbers to 30.214 dB PSNR and 0.9281 SSIM according to the paper, while the reported LPIPS moves in opposite directions depending on whether one reads the table or the text.
  • Because TTT linear attention uses a fixed-size hidden state rather than an explicit key-value cache, the architecture's memory cost is $O(1)$ per sequence, which is what makes the fast multi-scale video inference possible.
  • The ablation attributes the bulk of the quality gain to the invertible and frequency-filter modules, with the flow matching prior contributing a smaller increment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The refinement step is only as good as the externally pretrained velocity field, which the paper never specifies; a testable extension would train the flow matching prior on the same RAW demoiréing task and compare gains.
  • If the reported speed holds, the same TTT linear-attention backbone could be transferred to other nonlinear, spatially varying degradations such as reflection removal or JPEG artifact reduction, where plug-and-play generative priors are also known to struggle.
  • The LPIPS discrepancy between Table I and the text suggests the perceptual effect of flow matching refinement is unstable; measuring LPIPS before and after refinement on a held-out split would clarify whether the generative step genuinely helps or trades pixel fidelity for artifacts.
  • Because TFMP starts at t=0.95 and runs only about 15 iterations, it could be viewed as a lightweight post-processing module rather than a full generative restoration, allowing it to be swapped in or out of a deployment pipeline without retraining the supervised model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MoiréXNet, a RAW-to-sRGB demoiréing model that adapts the VDRaw framework by inserting invertible neural network (INN) blocks, a Learnable Frequency Enhanced Filter (LFEF), and linear-attention TTT modules, and combines this supervised model with a Truncated Flow Matching Prior (TFMP) refinement stage. The authors claim a hybrid MAP-based formulation, state-of-the-art PSNR/SSIM on the RawVDemoiré dataset (30.214 dB for TFMP vs. 30.004 dB for DemMamba), competitive results on TMM22, and an inference time of 0.070 s. The two main novelties are the architectural modifications to VDRaw and the TFMP refinement.

Significance. If the base-model numbers are reliable, the VDRaw-with-TTT adaptation is a credible empirical contribution: it reports 30.127 dB video PSNR and 0.070 s inference, surpassing DemMamba while being much faster, and Table II shows competitive TMM22 performance. The paper gives a reasonably detailed architecture description and reports efficiency transparently. However, the TFMP component is the paper's distinctive claimed contribution and it is currently neither derived, specified, nor consistently reported: the update rule is not MAP, the pretrained velocity field is undisclosed, and the LPIPS values in the text and Table I contradict each other. The significance of the paper as a hybrid MAP framework therefore cannot be assessed in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II-B / Section III-B] The MAP framing is not established. Eq. (1) is written for the linear model y = Hx + n, while the paper's own problem statement in Section III is y = M(x) + n with nonlinear M. The TFMP update xt-1 = xt + Δt·v(xt,t) contains no data-fidelity or likelihood term with respect to y, so the claim that it optimizes the MAP objective in Eq. (1) is unsupported; it is an unconditional generative step that can drift away from the observed frame. Moreover, the pretrained flow-matching velocity field is never described: its training data, architecture, loss, and checkpoint are absent, and the only related prior cited (PnP-Flow [43]) is said in Fig. 1 to produce artifacts on moiré sRGB inputs. Without this information the +0.087 dB gain in Table I cannot be verified or reproduced.
  2. [Table I / Section IV-D] The LPIPS reporting for TFMP is internally contradictory. Section IV-D states that the refined model 'achieves the lowest LPIPS score of 0.0795, which is 0.0054 lower than DeMMamba (0.0901)', but Table I lists TFMP LPIPS as 0.0973, which is worse than both MoiréXNet (0.0847) and DemMamba (0.0901). If the table is correct, the TFMP refinement degrades perceptual quality; if the text is correct, the table is wrong. This contradiction bears directly on the claim that TFMP 'further enhances' the base model, so the reported gain cannot be taken at face value.
  3. [Section IV-E / Table III] The ablation text does not match the ablation table. The text says adding INN gives a PSNR increase of +0.99, but Table III shows 29.04 to 29.36, i.e., +0.32; it says LFEF contributes +0.09, but the table shows 29.36 to 30.12, i.e., +0.76. Only the TFMP increment agrees (+0.09, from 30.12 to 30.21). Because this ablation is the evidence that the proposed architectural components are responsible for the reported gains, the mismatch must be resolved before the architecture contribution can be evaluated.
  4. [Section IV-E / Figure 5] The truncation parameters appear to be selected on the test set. Section IV-E states that 'the PSNR peaks around iteration 15' in Figure 5 and then sets t = 0.95 'to avoid overshooting the peak'. Since the refinement curve itself is used to pick the hyperparameters, the reported TFMP improvement is a selected result rather than an independent evaluation. In addition, Figure 5's vertical axis is labeled 'PSNR' but the plotted values are between 0 and 6; if these are PSNR values, they are implausible for the reported 30 dB range, and the axis needs correction or relabeling.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section I, contribution 3] The Introduction uses 'TFPM' instead of 'TFMP', and Section IV-D calls the method 'PnP flow matching'; the terminology should be made consistent throughout.
  2. [Section IV-A / Eq. (2)] Section IV-A says training begins with 'L1 VGG loss' and later fine-tunes with 'wavelet loss', but Eq. (2) only defines L1 and VGG losses, and the wavelet loss is never defined.
  3. [Section IV-D] SSIM is a unitless index, but the text reports 'SSIM is +0.0231 dB higher' and '+0.0141 dB higher'; the 'dB' unit should be removed.
  4. [Section III-B] The sentence 'we set xt = x~, with t starting from a higher value (e.g., t = 0.95)' and the mention of 'five samples drawn at each step' are unclear; the paper does not explain what the five samples are or how they are aggregated into the update.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'MoNoiréXNet' in Section IV-D, 'VDraw' in Section IV-E, and 'chanllenge' and 'demoi´ering' in Section II-B.
  6. [Section III-A] The term 'Test-Time Training' is used for the TTT blocks, but no self-supervised test-time adaptation objective is described; the paper should clarify whether these are used simply as linear-attention feature extractors.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

TFMP refinement gain is a fitted selection from the PSNR curve, not an independent prediction; the base MoiréXNet supervised model remains independently benchmarked.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV-E (Optimal t for Flow-Matching Denoising)]
    "The Figure 5 demonstrates that the PSNR peaks around iteration 15, where the algorithm achieves optimal performance. This indicates that ˜x is approximately at t = 0.98. To avoid overshooting the peak, we set t = 0.95 for our method."

    The TFMP refinement's key hyperparameters—initial timestep t=0.95 and the iteration count around 15—are chosen by inspecting the PSNR-versus-iteration curve in Figure 5. The reported +0.09 dB PSNR gain of TFMP over MoiréXNet in Table I and Table III is then presented as an independent refinement improvement. In fact, the reported value is the selected operating point on the curve that was used to choose the truncation, so the gain is fit to the evaluation metric rather than predicted out-of-sample. No separate validation protocol is described for selecting t, making the TFMP increment a selected result rather than an independent prediction. The base MoiréXNet result of 30.127 dB is obtained without this hyperparameter-fitting and remains independently meaningful.

full rationale

The supervised MoiréXNet model is trained with an explicit L1+VGG loss and evaluated against external baselines (RDNet, RRID, VDRaw, DemMamba, etc.) on RawVDemoire and TMM22. Those comparisons are self-contained and do not reduce to the paper's own assumptions, so the base-model SOTA claim has independent content. The main circularity burden is the TFMP refinement stage: Section IV-E explicitly chooses t=0.95 and the iteration count from the PSNR curve, then reports the corresponding PSNR as a refinement gain, which is a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. Additional evidence undermines the TFMP claim: Section IV-D reports TFMP LPIPS as 0.0795 while Table I reports 0.0973 (worse than MoiréXNet's 0.0847), and the ablation text increments (+0.99, +0.09) do not match Table III (+0.32, +0.76). The 'MAP-based framework' is also asserted rather than derived: Section III-B's update xt-1 = xt + Δt·v(xt,t) contains no data-fidelity term from the stated model y=M(x)+n, so it is not a MAP descent step for the stated inverse problem. These are correctness and verification failures, not additional definitional circularity. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem; the cited VDRaw backbone is an architectural starting point, not an appeal to authority for the central claim. Overall score 4: partial circularity in the TFMP gain, while the supervised base result remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on several hand-chosen hyperparameters, an unspecified pretrained flow-matching model, and an asserted but underived MAP connection. The most load-bearing choices are the TFMP truncation timestep and iteration count, which are selected from the evaluation PSNR curve, and the pretrained velocity field, whose provenance is not disclosed.

free parameters (4)
  • TFMP truncation start t = 0.95
    Chosen in Section IV-E2 from the PSNR-versus-iteration curve (Figure 5); the TFMP result depends on this choice.
  • Number of flow-matching refinement iterations = ~15
    The same curve shows PSNR peaking around iteration 15; this is not a fixed rule and affects the reported TFMP numbers.
  • Loss weights lambda_vgg and lambda_l1 = 0.3 and 0.7
    Set by hand in Section IV-C with no sensitivity analysis; all supervised training results depend on them.
  • TTT variant and hidden size = TTT 1B, hidden size 256
    Selected without justification in Section III-A; this capacity choice affects the feature representation and final metrics.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Moiré degradation is representable as y = M(x) + n with M a nonlinear, scene-dependent operator.
    Stated in Section III as the problem setting; M is never specified, estimated, or validated.
  • ad hoc to paper A pretrained flow-matching velocity field that maps degraded images to clean images is available and approximates the clean image prior for demoireing.
    Section III-B invokes this pretrained model but does not specify its training data, architecture, or source; the TFMP refinement stands or falls on it.
  • domain assumption TTT linear attention blocks can serve as image feature extractors when arranged in a multi-scale pyramid.
    Section III-A assumes this without explaining how 2D image features are tokenized into the sequence format TTT expects.
  • ad hoc to paper Concatenating a supervised network output with flow-matching steps optimizes a MAP objective for demoireing.
    No derivation connects the linear inverse-problem objective in Eq. (1) to the nonlinear degradation or to the two-stage procedure.
  • standard math The ODE dx/dt = v(x,t) with learned velocity field can be numerically integrated to transport samples between distributions.
    Standard flow-matching theory is assumed; the paper does not define the training objective for v.
invented entities (2)
  • Truncated Flow Matching Prior (TFMP) as a refinement procedure
    purpose: Post-processes MoiréXNet outputs by integrating a pretrained flow-matching velocity field starting at t=0.95.
    No standalone falsifiable handle; its only observable effect is the reported benchmark metrics, which conflict between Table I and the text.
  • Learnable Frequency Enhanced Filter (LFEF)
    purpose: Amplifies low- and high-frequency components before TTT attention blocks to preserve detail.
    Introduced as a module without a source reference or independent validation; its contribution is only visible in ablations that contain inconsistent PSNR increments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Moir\'eXNet: Adaptive Multi-Scale Demoir\'eing with Linear Attention Test-Time Training and Truncated Flow Matching Prior." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HVNQLZOX

@misc{pith2026250615929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Moir\'eXNet: Adaptive Multi-Scale Demoir\'eing with Linear Attention Test-Time Training and Truncated Flow Matching Prior},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HVNQLZOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15929}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a novel framework for image and video demoir\'eing by integrating Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation with advanced deep learning techniques. Demoir\'eing addresses inherently nonlinear degradation processes, which pose significant challenges for existing methods. Traditional supervised learning approaches either fail to remove moir\'e patterns completely or produce overly smooth results. This stems from constrained model capacity and scarce training data, which inadequately represent the clean image distribution and hinder accurate reconstruction of ground-truth images. While generative models excel in image restoration for linear degradations, they struggle with nonlinear cases such as demoir\'eing and often introduce artifacts. To address these limitations, we propose a hybrid MAP-based framework that integrates two complementary components. The first is a supervised learning model enhanced with efficient linear attention Test-Time Training (TTT) modules, which directly learn nonlinear mappings for RAW-to-sRGB demoir\'eing. The second is a Truncated Flow Matching Prior (TFMP) that further refines the outputs by aligning them with the clean image distribution, effectively restoring high-frequency details and suppressing artifacts. These two components combine the computational efficiency of linear attention with the refinement abilities of generative models, resulting in improved restoration performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15929 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visual comparison of moire artifact removal and detail preservation: ´ (a) Clean Images, (b) Moire Images, (c) PnP Flow Matching with Moir ´ e sRGB ´ as inputs, (d) MoireXNet results (ours), and (e) Moir ´ eXNet results enhanced ´ refinement via TFMP. Using pretrained PnP Flow Matching with a linear kernel on moire sRGB inputs (d) leads to artifacts like bullring effects due to ´ the nonlinear nature of the moire pa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An overview of the proposed method. it fails to fully exploit the benefits of supervised learning and clean image priors, which restricts its effectiveness. This paper proposes a generic approach to tackling im￾age/video restoration and demonstrates its effectiveness, par￾ticularly in the challenging task of demoireing. Our contribu- ´ tions can be summarized as follows: 1) Hybrid MAP-based framework: We introduce a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparison on RAW video demoir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison on RAW image demoir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Denoiser iterations vs PSNR This indicates that x˜ is approximately at t = 0.98. To avoid overshooting the peak, we set t = 0.95 for our method. V. CONCLUSION We proposed a hybrid approach for nonlinear moire removal ´ by combining an efficient supervised model with a …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Pnp-flow: Plug-and-play image restoration with flow matching,

    S. Martin, A. Gagneux, P. Hagemann, and G. Steidl, “Pnp-flow: Plug-and-play image restoration with flow matching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02423, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Coarse- to-fine disentangling demoir ´eing framework for recaptured screen images,

    C. Wang, B. He, S. Wu, R. Wan, B. Shi, and L.-Y . Duan, “Coarse- to-fine disentangling demoir ´eing framework for recaptured screen images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intel- ligence, 2023

    2023

  3. [2]

    Moir´e photo restoration using multires- olution convolutional neural networks,

    Y . Sun, Y . Yu, and W. Wang, “Moir´e photo restoration using multires- olution convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 4160–4172, 2018

    2018

  4. [3]

    Learning frequency domain priors for image demoireing,

    B. Zheng, S. Yuan, C. Yan, X. Tian, J. Zhang, Y . Sun, L. Liu, A. Leonardis, and G. Slabaugh, “Learning frequency domain priors for image demoireing,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 7705–7717, 2021

    2021

  5. [4]

    Hardware-friendly de- screening,

    H. Siddiqui, M. Boutin, and C. A. Bouman, “Hardware-friendly de- screening,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 746–757, 2009

    2009

  6. [5]

    Scanned image descreening with image redundancy and adaptive filtering,

    B. Sun, S. Li, and J. Sun, “Scanned image descreening with image redundancy and adaptive filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Image Pro- cessing, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 3698–3710, 2014

    2014

  7. [6]

    Textured image demoir´eing via signal decomposition and guided filtering,

    J. Yang, F. Liu, H. Yue, X. Fu, C. Hou, and F. Wu, “Textured image demoir´eing via signal decomposition and guided filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3528–3541, 2017

    2017

  8. [7]

    Integral imaging with reduced color moir ´e pattern by using a slanted lens array,

    Y . Kim, G. Park, S.-W. Cho, J.-h. Jung, B. Lee, Y . Choi, and M.-G. Lee, “Integral imaging with reduced color moir ´e pattern by using a slanted lens array,” in Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XIX , vol. 6803. SPIE, 2008, pp. 541–548

    2008

Show all 119 references
  1. [8]

    A median- gaussian filtering framework for moir´e pattern noise removal from x-ray microscopy image,

    Z. Wei, J. Wang, H. Nichol, S. Wiebe, and D. Chapman, “A median- gaussian filtering framework for moir´e pattern noise removal from x-ray microscopy image,” Micron, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 170–176, 2012

    2012

  2. [10]

    Recaptured screen image demoir ´eing in raw domain,

    H. Yue, Y . Cheng, Y . Mao, C. Cao, and J. Yang, “Recaptured screen image demoir ´eing in raw domain,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Towards efficient and scale-robust ultra-high-definition image demoir ´eing,

    X. Yu, P. Dai, W. Li, L. Ma, J. Shen, J. Li, and X. Qi, “Towards efficient and scale-robust ultra-high-definition image demoir ´eing,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 646–662

    2022

  4. [12]

    Image demoireing with learnable bandpass filters,

    B. Zheng, S. Yuan, G. Slabaugh, and A. Leonardis, “Image demoireing with learnable bandpass filters,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2020, pp. 3636–3645

    2020

  5. [13]

    Image demoir ´eing via multi-scale fusion networks with moir´e data augmentation,

    Y .-T. Peng, C.-H. Hou, Y .-C. Lee, A. J. Yoon, Z. Chen, Y .-T. Lin, and W.-C. Lien, “Image demoir ´eing via multi-scale fusion networks with moir´e data augmentation,” IEEE Sensors Journal , 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Video demoireing with relation-based temporal consistency,

    P. Dai, X. Yu, L. Ma, B. Zhang, J. Li, W. Li, J. Shen, and X. Qi, “Video demoireing with relation-based temporal consistency,” in Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 17 622–17 631

    2022

  7. [15]

    Recaptured raw screen image and video demoir \’eing via channel and spatial modulations,

    H. Yue, Y . Cheng, X. Liu, and J. Yang, “Recaptured raw screen image and video demoir \’eing via channel and spatial modulations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20332, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Learning image demoir´eing from unpaired real data,

    Y . Zhong, Y . Zhou, Y . Zhang, F. Chao, and R. Ji, “Learning image demoir´eing from unpaired real data,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 7, 2024, pp. 7623– 7631

    2024

  9. [17]

    Demoir \’eing of camera-captured screen images using deep convolutional neural network,

    B. Liu, X. Shu, and X. Wu, “Demoir \’eing of camera-captured screen images using deep convolutional neural network,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03809, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Aim 2019 challenge on image demoireing: Dataset and study,

    S. Yuan, R. Timofte, G. Slabaugh, and A. Leonardis, “Aim 2019 challenge on image demoireing: Dataset and study,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02498

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Multi-scale dynamic feature encoding network for image demoir ´eing,

    X. Cheng, Z. Fu, and J. Yang, “Multi-scale dynamic feature encoding network for image demoir ´eing,” in 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 3486–3493

    2019

  12. [20]

    Mop moire patterns using mopnet,

    B. He, C. Wang, B. Shi, and L.-Y . Duan, “Mop moire patterns using mopnet,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 2424–2432

    2019

  13. [21]

    Moir ´e pattern removal with multi-scale feature enhancing network,

    T. Gao, Y . Guo, X. Zheng, Q. Wang, and X. Luo, “Moir ´e pattern removal with multi-scale feature enhancing network,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2019, pp. 240–245

    2019

  14. [22]

    Wavelet-based dual-branch network for image demoir ´eing,

    L. Liu, J. Liu, S. Yuan, G. Slabaugh, A. Leonardis, W. Zhou, and Q. Tian, “Wavelet-based dual-branch network for image demoir ´eing,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIII 16 . Springer, 2020, pp. 86–102

    2020

  15. [23]

    Mmdm: Multi- frame and multi-scale for image demoireing,

    S. Liu, C. Li, N. Nan, Z. Zong, and R. Song, “Mmdm: Multi- frame and multi-scale for image demoireing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Image demoir ´eing with a dual- domain distilling network,

    H. Wang, Q. Tian, L. Li, and X. Guo, “Image demoir ´eing with a dual- domain distilling network,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  17. [25]

    Progressive moire removal and texture complementation for image demoireing,

    Y . Niu, Z. Lin, W. Liu, and W. Guo, “Progressive moire removal and texture complementation for image demoireing,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Freqformer: Frequency-aware transformer for lightweight image super-resolution,

    T. Dai, J. Wang, H. Guo, J. Li, J. Wang, and Z. Zhu, “Freqformer: Frequency-aware transformer for lightweight image super-resolution,” IJCAI. ijcai. org , 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Image demoireing in raw and srgb domains,

    S. Xu, B. Song, X. Chen, X. Liu, and J. Zhou, “Image demoireing in raw and srgb domains,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2024, pp. 108–124

    2024

  20. [28]

    Generative adversarial networks,

    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde- Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative adversarial networks,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes,

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,”

  22. [30]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bayesian im- age reconstruction using deep generative models,

    R. V . Marinescu, D. Moyer, and P. Golland, “Bayesian im- age reconstruction using deep generative models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04567, 2020

    2012 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Compressed sensing using generative models,

    A. Bora, A. Jalal, E. Price, and A. G. Dimakis, “Compressed sensing using generative models,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2017, pp. 537–546

    2017

  25. [33]

    Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias,

    M. Asim, M. Daniels, O. Leong, A. Ahmed, and P. Hand, “Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 399–409

    2020

  26. [34]

    Deep unfolding with normalizing flow priors for inverse problems,

    X. Wei, H. Van Gorp, L. Gonzalez-Carabarin, D. Freedman, Y . C. Eldar, and R. J. van Sloun, “Deep unfolding with normalizing flow priors for inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 70, pp. 2962–2971, 2022. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, ...

    2022

  27. [35]

    Patchnr: learning from very few images by patch normal- izing flow regularization,

    F. Altekr ¨uger, A. Denker, P. Hagemann, J. Hertrich, P. Maass, and G. Steidl, “Patchnr: learning from very few images by patch normal- izing flow regularization,” Inverse Problems, vol. 39, no. 6, p. 064006, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    D-flow: Differentiating through flows for controlled generation,

    H. Ben-Hamu, O. Puny, I. Gat, B. Karrer, U. Singer, and Y . Lipman, “D-flow: Differentiating through flows for controlled generation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14017, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Flow priors for linear inverse problems via iterative corrupted trajec- tory matching,

    Y . Zhang, P. Yu, Y . Zhu, Y . Chang, F. Gao, Y . N. Wu, and O. Leong, “Flow priors for linear inverse problems via iterative corrupted trajec- tory matching,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 37, pp. 57 389–57 417, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Training-free linear image inverses via flows,

    A. Pokle, M. J. Muckley, R. T. Chen, and B. Karrer, “Training-free linear image inverses via flows,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04432 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,

    H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. Mccann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14687 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems,

    J. Song, A. Vahdat, M. Mardani, and J. Kautz, “Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Proximal denoiser for convergent plug-and-play optimization with nonconvex regularization,

    S. Hurault, A. Leclaire, and N. Papadakis, “Proximal denoiser for convergent plug-and-play optimization with nonconvex regularization,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 9483–9505

    2022

  34. [42]

    Recovery analysis for plug-and-play priors using the restricted eigenvalue condition,

    J. Liu, S. Asif, B. Wohlberg, and U. Kamilov, “Recovery analysis for plug-and-play priors using the restricted eigenvalue condition,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 5921– 5933, 2021

    2021

  35. [44]

    Unsupervised moir ´e pattern removal for recaptured screen images,

    H. Yue, Y . Cheng, F. Liu, and J. Yang, “Unsupervised moir ´e pattern removal for recaptured screen images,” Neurocomputing, vol. 456, pp. 352–363, 2021

    2021

  36. [45]

    Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks,

    J.-Y . Zhu, T. Park, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros, “Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , Oct 2017

    2017

  37. [46]

    Stationary grid pattern removal using 2d technique for moire-free radiographic image display,

    R. Sasada, M. Yamada, S. Hara, H. Takeo, and K. Shimura, “Stationary grid pattern removal using 2d technique for moire-free radiographic image display,” in Medical Imaging 2003: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, vol. 5029. SPIE, 2003, pp. 688–697

    2003

  38. [47]

    Fhde 2 net: Full high definition demoireing network,

    B. He, C. Wang, B. Shi, and L.-Y . Duan, “Fhde 2 net: Full high definition demoireing network,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXII 16. Springer, 2020, pp. 713–729

    2020

  39. [48]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 770–778

    2016

  40. [49]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems , 2017

    2017

  41. [50]

    Vmamba: Visual state space model,

    Y . Liu, Y . Tian, Y . Zhao, H. Yu, L. Xie, Y . Wang, Q. Ye, J. Jiao, and Y . Liu, “Vmamba: Visual state space model,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 37, pp. 103 031–103 063, 2025

    2025

  42. [51]

    Learning to (learn at test time): Rnns with expressive hidden states,

    Y . Sun, X. Li, K. Dalal, J. Xu, A. Vikram, G. Zhang, Y . Dubois, X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Koyejo et al., “Learning to (learn at test time): Rnns with expressive hidden states,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04620, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Multi-scale dynamic feature encoding network for image demoir ´eing,

    X. Cheng, Z. Fu, and J. Yang, “Multi-scale dynamic feature encoding network for image demoir ´eing,” in 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) , 2019, pp. 3486– 3493

    2019

  44. [53]

    Mmdm: Multi-frame and multi-scale for image demoir ´eing,

    S. Liu, C. Li, N. Nan, Z. Zong, and R. Song, “Mmdm: Multi-frame and multi-scale for image demoir ´eing,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2020, pp. 1751–1759

    2020

  45. [54]

    Dual-domain deep convolutional neu- ral networks for image demoireing,

    A. G. Vien, H. Park, and C. Lee, “Dual-domain deep convolutional neu- ral networks for image demoireing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2020, pp. 470–471

    2020

  46. [55]

    C3net: Demoir ´eing network attentive in channel, color and concatenation,

    S. Kim, H. Nam, J. Kim, and J. Jeong, “C3net: Demoir ´eing network attentive in channel, color and concatenation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020, pp. 426–427

    2020

  47. [56]

    Moir ´e pattern removal via attentive fractal network,

    D. Xu, Y . Chu, and Q. Sun, “Moir ´e pattern removal via attentive fractal network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2020, pp. 472–473

    2020

  48. [57]

    Deep wavelet network with domain adaptation for single image demoireing,

    X. Luo, J. Zhang, M. Hong, Y . Qu, Y . Xie, and C. Li, “Deep wavelet network with domain adaptation for single image demoireing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020, pp. 420–421

    2020

  49. [58]

    Real-time image demoireing on mobile devices,

    Y . Zhang, M. Lin, X. Li, H. Liu, G. Wang, F. Chao, S. Ren, Y . Wen, X. Chen, and R. Ji, “Real-time image demoireing on mobile devices,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02184 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Image demoireing in raw and srgb domains,

    S. Xu, B. Song, X. Chen, X. Liu, and J. Zhou, “Image demoireing in raw and srgb domains,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 108–124

    2025

  51. [60]

    Direction-aware video demoireing with temporal-guided bilateral learning,

    S. Xu, B. Song, X. Chen, and J. Zhou, “Direction-aware video demoireing with temporal-guided bilateral learning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 6, 2024, pp. 6360–6368

    2024

  52. [61]

    Std-net: Spatio-temporal decompo- sition network for video demoir ´eing with sparse transformers,

    Y . Niu, R. Xu, Z. Lin, and W. Liu, “Std-net: Spatio-temporal decompo- sition network for video demoir ´eing with sparse transformers,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2024

    2024

  53. [62]

    Video demoir ´eing with deep temporal color embedding and video- image invertible consistency,

    L. Liu, J. An, S. Yuan, W. Zhou, H. Li, Y . Wang, and Q. Tian, “Video demoir ´eing with deep temporal color embedding and video- image invertible consistency,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2024

    2024

  54. [63]

    Recaptured raw screen image and video demoireing via channel and spatial modulations,

    Y . Cheng, X. Liu, and J. Yang, “Recaptured raw screen image and video demoireing via channel and spatial modulations,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, pp. 40 414–40 425, 2023

    2023

  55. [64]

    Deep video demoir ´eing via compact invertible dyadic decomposition,

    Y . Quan, H. Huang, S. He, and R. Xu, “Deep video demoir ´eing via compact invertible dyadic decomposition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 12 677–12 686

    2023

  56. [65]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 , 2020

    2010 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014

    2014 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition. corr abs/1512.03385 (2015),

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition. corr abs/1512.03385 (2015),” 2015

    2015 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Transfer reinforcement learning: Feature trans- ferability in ship collision avoidance,

    X. Wang and Y . Jin, “Transfer reinforcement learning: Feature trans- ferability in ship collision avoidance,” in International Design En- gineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 87318. American Society of Mechanical Engine...

    2023

  60. [69]

    A multimodal transformer: Fusing clinical notes with structured ehr data for interpretable in-hospital mortality prediction,

    W. Lyu, X. Dong, R. Wong, S. Zheng, K. Abell-Hart, F. Wang, and C. Chen, “A multimodal transformer: Fusing clinical notes with structured ehr data for interpretable in-hospital mortality prediction,” in AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2022. American Medical Informatics...

    2022

  61. [70]

    Backdooring vision-language models with out-of-distribution data,

    W. Lyu, J. Yao, S. Gupta, L. Pang, T. Sun, L. Yi, L. Hu, H. Ling, and C. Chen, “Backdooring vision-language models with out-of-distribution data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01264 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Swinfsr: Stereo image super-resolution using swinir and frequency domain knowledge,

    K. Chen, L. Li, H. Liu, Y . Li, C. Tang, and J. Chen, “Swinfsr: Stereo image super-resolution using swinir and frequency domain knowledge,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2023, pp. 1764–1774

    2023

  63. [72]

    Pscc-net: Progressive spatio- channel correlation network for image manipulation detection and localization,

    X. Liu, Y . Liu, J. Chen, and X. Liu, “Pscc-net: Progressive spatio- channel correlation network for image manipulation detection and localization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 7505–7517, 2022

    2022

  64. [73]

    Griddehazenet: Attention- based multi-scale network for image dehazing,

    X. Liu, Y . Ma, Z. Shi, and J. Chen, “Griddehazenet: Attention- based multi-scale network for image dehazing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , October 2019

    2019

  65. [74]

    Attention- enhancing backdoor attacks against bert-based models,

    W. Lyu, S. Zheng, L. Pang, H. Ling, and C. Chen, “Attention- enhancing backdoor attacks against bert-based models,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , 2023, pp. 10 672–10 690

    2023

  66. [75]

    A data-centric solution to nonhomogeneous dehazing via vision transformer,

    Y . Liu, H. Liu, L. Li, Z. Wu, and J. Chen, “A data-centric solution to nonhomogeneous dehazing via vision transformer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2023, pp. 1406–1415

    2023

  67. [76]

    Work process transfer reinforcement learning: Feature extraction and finetuning in ship collision avoidance,

    X. Wang and Y . Jin, “Work process transfer reinforcement learning: Feature extraction and finetuning in ship collision avoidance,” in In- ternational Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference , vol. 86212. American Societ...

    2022

  68. [77]

    Exploring causalworld: Enhancing robotic manipulation via knowledge transfer and curriculum learning,

    ——, “Exploring causalworld: Enhancing robotic manipulation via knowledge transfer and curriculum learning,” in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 10 Engineering Confe...

    2021

  69. [78]

    Demmamba: Alignment-free raw video demoireing with frequency-assisted spatio- temporal mamba,

    S. Xu, X. Liu, B. Song, X. Chen, Q. Chen, and J. Zhou, “Demmamba: Alignment-free raw video demoireing with frequency-assisted spatio- temporal mamba,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10679 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,

    A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Cddfuse: Correlation-driven dual-branch feature decomposition for multi-modality image fusion,

    Z. Zhao, H. Bai, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, S. Xu, Z. Lin, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Cddfuse: Correlation-driven dual-branch feature decomposition for multi-modality image fusion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2023, pp. 5906–5916

    2023

  72. [81]

    Learning spatial-frequency transformer for visual object tracking,

    C. Tang, X. Wang, Y . Bai, Z. Wu, J. Zhang, and Y . Huang, “Learning spatial-frequency transformer for visual object tracking,” IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 5102–5116, 2023

    2023

  73. [82]

    Anti-oversmoothing in deep vision transformers via the fourier domain analysis: From theory to practice,

    P. Wang, W. Zheng, T. Chen, and Z. Wang, “Anti-oversmoothing in deep vision transformers via the fourier domain analysis: From theory to practice,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05962 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Density estimation using real nvp,

    L. Dinh, J. Sohl-Dickstein, and S. Bengio, “Density estimation using real nvp,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803 , 2016

    2016 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions,

    D. P. Kingma and P. Dhariwal, “Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  76. [85]

    Nice: Non-linear independent components estimation,

    L. Dinh, D. Krueger, and Y . Bengio, “Nice: Non-linear independent components estimation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516 , 2014

    2014 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE transactions on image processing , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004

    2004

  78. [87]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,

    P. Isola, J.-Y . Zhu, T. Zhou, and A. A. Efros, “Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 1125–1134

    2017

  79. [88]

    Fields of experts: A framework for learning image priors,

    S. Roth and M. J. Black, “Fields of experts: A framework for learning image priors,” in CVPR, 2005, pp. 860–867

    2005

  80. [89]

    Prior learning and gibbs reaction- diffusion,

    S. C. Zhu and D. Mumford, “Prior learning and gibbs reaction- diffusion,” TPAMI, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1236–1250, 1997

    1997

  81. [90]

    Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images,

    S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984

    1984

  82. [91]

    Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,

    K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang, “Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,” TPAMI, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2341–2353, 2010

    2010

  83. [92]

    Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,

    L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D: nonlinear phenomena , vol. 60, no. 1-4, pp. 259–268, 1992

    1992

  84. [93]

    Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods,

    D. Ruderman and W. Bialek, “Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 6, 1993

    1993

  85. [94]

    Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage,

    A. Chambolle, R. A. De V ore, N.-Y . Lee, and B. J. Lucier, “Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage,”IEEE Transactions on image processing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 319–335, 1998

    1998

  86. [95]

    De-noising by soft-thresholding,

    D. L. Donoho, “De-noising by soft-thresholding,” IEEE transactions on information theory , vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 613–627, 2002

    2002

  87. [96]

    Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage,

    D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage,” Journal of the american statistical association , vol. 90, no. 432, pp. 1200–1224, 1995

    1995

  88. [97]

    Analysis of multiresolution image denoising schemes using generalized gaussian and complexity priors,

    P. Moulin and J. Liu, “Analysis of multiresolution image denoising schemes using generalized gaussian and complexity priors,” IEEE transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 909–919, 1999

    1999

  89. [98]

    Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing

    S. Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing . Elsevier, 1999

    1999

  90. [99]

    Recent developments in total variation image restoration,

    T. Chan, S. Esedoglu, F. Park, A. Yip et al., “Recent developments in total variation image restoration,” Mathematical Models of Computer Vision, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 17–31, 2005

    2005

  91. [100]

    An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications,

    A. Chambolle, “An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications,” Journal of Mathematical imaging and vision , vol. 20, pp. 89–97, 2004

    2004

  92. [101]

    From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration,

    D. Zoran and Y . Weiss, “From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration,” in 2011 international conference on computer vision . IEEE, 2011, pp. 479–486

    2011

  93. [102]

    Plug-and- play priors for model based reconstruction,

    S. V . Venkatakrishnan, C. A. Bouman, and B. Wohlberg, “Plug-and- play priors for model based reconstruction,” in 2013 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing . IEEE, 2013, pp. 945–948

    2013

  94. [103]

    Plug-and-play priors for bright field electron tomography and sparse interpolation,

    S. Sreehari, S. V . Venkatakrishnan, B. Wohlberg, G. T. Buzzard, L. F. Drummy, J. P. Simmons, and C. A. Bouman, “Plug-and-play priors for bright field electron tomography and sparse interpolation,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 408–423, 2016

    2016

  95. [104]

    Plug-and-play admm for image restoration: Fixed-point convergence and applications,

    S. H. Chan, X. Wang, and O. A. Elgendy, “Plug-and-play admm for image restoration: Fixed-point convergence and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–98, 2016

    2016

  96. [105]

    Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising,

    K. Zhang, W. Zuo, Y . Chen, D. Meng, and L. Zhang, “Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising,” IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3142–3155, 2017

    2017

  97. [106]

    Deep mean- shift priors for image restoration,

    S. Arjomand Bigdeli, M. Zwicker, P. Favaro, and M. Jin, “Deep mean- shift priors for image restoration,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  98. [107]

    Trainable nonlinear reaction diffusion: A flexible framework for fast and effective image restoration,

    Y . Chen and T. Pock, “Trainable nonlinear reaction diffusion: A flexible framework for fast and effective image restoration,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1256– 1272, 2016

    2016

  99. [108]

    Adversarial regularizers in inverse problems,

    S. Lunz, O. ¨Oktem, and C.-B. Sch ¨onlieb, “Adversarial regularizers in inverse problems,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  100. [109]

    Learning proximal operators: Using denoising networks for regularizing inverse imaging problems,

    T. Meinhardt, M. Moller, C. Hazirbas, and D. Cremers, “Learning proximal operators: Using denoising networks for regularizing inverse imaging problems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Confer- ence on Computer Vision , 2017, pp. 1781–1790

    2017

  101. [110]

    Plug-and-play image restoration with deep denoiser prior,

    K. Zhang, Y . Li, W. Zuo, L. Zhang, L. Van Gool, and R. Timofte, “Plug-and-play image restoration with deep denoiser prior,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 6360–6376, 2021

    2021

  102. [111]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,

    Y . Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456 , 2020

    2011 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, “Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” in International conference on machine learning . pmlr, 2015, pp. 2256–2265

    2015

  104. [113]

    Diff-plugin: Revitaliz- ing details for diffusion-based low-level tasks,

    Y . Liu, Z. Ke, F. Liu, N. Zhao, and R. W. Lau, “Diff-plugin: Revitaliz- ing details for diffusion-based low-level tasks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 4197–4208

    2024

  105. [114]

    Flow matching for generative modeling,

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le, “Flow matching for generative modeling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow,

    X. Liu, C. Gong, and Q. Liu, “Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Edvr: Video restoration with enhanced deformable convolutional networks,

    X. Wang, K. C. Chan, K. Yu, C. Dong, and C. Change Loy, “Edvr: Video restoration with enhanced deformable convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , 2019, pp. 0–0

    2019

  108. [117]

    Real-scene reflection removal with raw-rgb image pairs,

    B. Song, J. Zhou, X. Chen, and S. Zhang, “Real-scene reflection removal with raw-rgb image pairs,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2023

    2023

  109. [118]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,

    R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, and O. Wang, “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 586–595

    2018

  110. [119]

    P-bic: Ultra-high-definition image moir ´e patterns removal via patch bilateral compensation,

    Z. Xiao, Z. Lu, and X. Wang, “P-bic: Ultra-high-definition image moir ´e patterns removal via patch bilateral compensation,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2024, pp. 8365–8373

    2024

  111. [2022]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.