Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 91 references

BrainLesion Suite: A Flexible and User-Friendly Framework for Modular Brain Lesion Image Analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BrainLesion Suite is a modular Python toolkit whose central claim is that a researcher can assemble a complete brain lesion analysis workflow—from raw multi-modal MRI to lesion-wise evaluation—by chaining interchangeable open-source…

desk verdict A useful modular toolkit description whose load-bearing end-to-end and PeTu claims are unverified; it still deserves a serious referee with requested revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.09036 v1 pith:B7F62YSC submitted 2025-07-11 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.SE

Florian Kofler , Marcel Rosier , Mehdi Astaraki , Hendrik Möller , Ilhem Isra Mekki , Josef A. Buchner , Anton Schmick , Arianna Pfiffer
show 21 more authors
Eva Oswald Lucas Zimmer Ezequiel de la Rosa Sarthak Pati Julian Canisius Arianna Piffer Ujjwal Baid Mahyar Valizadeh Akis Linardos Jan C. Peeken Surprosanna Shit Felix Steinbauer Daniel Rueckert Rolf Heckemann Spyridon Bakas Jan Kirschke Constantin von See Ivan Ezhov Marie Piraud Benedikt Wiestler Bjoern Menze
This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE
keywords brainlesionanalysisMRIpreprocessingimageregistrationtumorsegmentationpediatricnnU-Netinstance-wiseevaluationmodularpipeline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces BrainLesion Suite (BLS), a collection of modular Python packages designed to let researchers and clinicians build brain lesion image analysis pipelines by combining components. The central claim is that these modules cover the full workflow—organizing and preprocessing multi-modal MRI, segmenting lesions with pretrained models, synthesizing missing sequences, estimating segmentation quality, and computing instance-wise evaluation metrics—so that users can reproduce challenge-style standardization without reimplementing it. The paper also presents PeTu, a pediatric brain tumor segmentation model built on nnU-Net, with strong reported whole-tumor and T2-hyperintense performance, moderate enhancing-tumor performance, and limited cystic-component performance. If the suite works as described, it would lower the engineering barrier between state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms and their use in clinical and scientific practice.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the modular architecture itself. Each BLS module is an independent, installable Python package with defined input and output conventions, and the preprocessing module (BLP) is the backbone: it co-registers arbitrary multi-modal images, registers them to an atlas such as SRI-24 or MNI-152, and applies optional brain extraction, defacing, N4 bias-field correction, and intensity normalization, with pluggable backends for registration, brain extraction, and defacing. PeTu and GlioMODA are carried by the nnU-Net self-configuring framework, which adapts network topology, preprocessing, and training schedule to a given dataset. Functionally, the modular design is what allows non-BLS modules to be inserted into BLS pipelines, so the claim of interoperability rests on the stability of these interfaces rather than on any single algorithm.

What would settle it

Run a complete BLS pipeline on a public multi-modal brain MRI dataset with reference labels, feeding raw scans through BLP, then a segmentation module such as GlioMODA or AURORA, then Panoptica, and compare the final whole-tumor and lesion-wise metrics against the published per-module scores. If the chained pipeline's metrics fall substantially below those published scores, the central claim that BLS enables reliable end-to-end pipelines would be falsified; the paper provides no such integrated measurement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that assembling a complete brain lesion analysis pipeline can be reduced to chaining independent, individually tested modules. BLP handles co-registration, atlas registration, optional defacing and skull-stripping, N4 bias correction, and intensity normalization; modsort organizes raw MRI sequences; BraTS orchestrator, AURORA, and GlioMODA supply segmentation and generative models; DQE predicts human-rated segmentation quality; and Panoptica computes instance-wise metrics such as recognition quality, segmentation quality, and panoptic quality. The newly introduced component is PeTu, a 3D nnU-Net trained on co-registered multi-modal MRI for pediatric tumor segmentation, producing whole-tumor, T2-hyperintense, enhancing-tumor, and cystic-component masks; the paper reports strong whole-tumor and T2-hyperintense performance, moderate enhancing-tumor performance, and limited cystic-component performance. The paper does not present quantitative results for PeTu or an integrated validation of a full BLS pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

The suite's end-to-end utility assumes that each component, when invoked through BLS, performs as it did in its original publication, since the paper does not validate the full preprocessing-to-segmentation-to-evaluation workflow as an integrated whole.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A researcher with raw multi-modal brain MRI could go from raw sequence organization to registered, skull-stripped, intensity-normalized volumes in a single scripted pipeline.
  • Pretrained segmentation models from the BraTS ecosystem, AURORA, and GlioMODA become callable modules, so challenge-level tumor segmentation could be applied to private datasets without rebuilding the challenge preprocessing.
  • Missing or corrupt MRI sequences could be filled by synthesis models and voided tumor regions inpainted, enabling longitudinal or multi-center studies that would otherwise drop cases.
  • Quality could be screened automatically before manual review: DQE flags segmentations that a human rater would judge poor, reducing the need to inspect every mask.
  • Evaluation could move beyond whole-volume Dice to lesion-wise metrics such as panoptic quality, average symmetric surface distance, and centerline Dice, which matter for pathologies presenting as many small separate lesions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the framework matures, the most consequential test is an independent end-to-end benchmark: run the same raw dataset through a BLS-assembled pipeline and compare final lesion-wise metrics against the published numbers of the component models; the paper does not report such a run.
  • The modularity implies a natural extension to non-brain biomedical imaging, since BLP registration and Panoptica evaluation are not brain-specific; the paper gestures at this but does not demonstrate it.
  • Because PeTu is asserted without quantitative results, its integration into the suite currently rests on qualitative claims; obtaining and publishing its validation numbers would be the direct next step.
  • The suite's reliance on command-line tools and scripting, acknowledged in the paper, suggests that graphical user interfaces are the main usability barrier to clinical adoption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes BrainLesion Suite (BLS), an open-source collection of Python modules for building brain lesion image analysis pipelines. The suite comprises a preprocessing module (BLP) for co-registration, atlas registration, skull stripping, defacing, N4 bias correction, and intensity normalization; modsort for MRI sequence organization; the BraTS orchestrator for accessing BraTS challenge models; AURORA for metastasis segmentation; GlioMODA for adult glioma segmentation; PeTu, a newly introduced nnU-Net pipeline for pediatric tumor segmentation; DQE for quality estimation; and Panoptica for instance-wise evaluation. The paper also outlines several application scenarios such as lesion segmentation, imaging biomarker studies, longitudinal analysis, and tumor growth modeling. The central claim is that BLS enables researchers to combine its modules with non-BLS modules to create reliable end-to-end image analysis workflows with minimal effort.

Significance. If the framework works as described, BLS would be a useful infrastructure contribution: it consolidates several previously published, externally validated components (AURORA, GlioMODA, BraTS orchestrator, Panoptica) into one modular ecosystem, is open-source under permissive licenses, and emphasizes cross-platform compatibility. The manuscript also names concrete strengths, including the availability of tutorials and the reuse of BraTS challenge algorithms. However, the paper's own contribution is currently limited to software description: no end-to-end pipeline experiment, no runtime or usability measurement, and no quantitative evaluation of the new PeTu model are provided. The significance of the framework-level claims therefore rests on unverified interface compatibility and on qualitative assertions about PeTu performance.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.6 (PeTu)] The PeTu model is presented as a contribution of this study, but the manuscript supplies no quantitative evaluation. The claims that performance is 'strong' for WT and T2H, 'moderate' for ET, and 'limited' for CC are unsupported by any reported Dice, surface distance, or comparison with baseline methods. Since this is one of the few genuinely new elements of the paper, the authors should either add a results section with dataset description, metrics, and comparisons, or explicitly state that PeTu is a preliminary release and remove the performance claims. As written, the claim is load-bearing for the paper's novelty and cannot be verified.
  2. [§2.1, §2.4, §2.5 (end-to-end interface validation)] The central value proposition is that BLS modules can be chained end-to-end and reproduce the performance of the component models. The manuscript does not demonstrate this. In particular, §2.4 states that AURORA requires skull-stripped MRI in 1 mm isotropic resolution, and §2.1 describes BLP operations (rigid or atlas registration, HD-Bet, N4, intensity normalization) that alter voxel spacing, orientation, and intensity distributions. No experiment shows whether BLP-preprocessed inputs preserve AURORA or GlioMODA Dice/ASSD relative to the preprocessing used in their original validations. The authors should add an integrated validation on a small cohort, or at least a compatibility test comparing metric values with and without BLP preprocessing, to substantiate the claim that pre-validated models retain their performance inside the suite.
  3. [Abstract and §2] The abstract and Section 2 claim a 'brainless' development experience that minimizes cognitive effort. This is a usability claim, but the paper contains no user study, no timing measurements, and no comparison with alternative toolkits. The Discussion's limitations section even acknowledges that reliance on command-line tools and scripting may limit accessibility. The authors should either temper the 'brainless' phrasing to describe the design goal rather than an achieved property, or provide evidence such as tutorial completion times, number of setup steps, or a small usability evaluation. This is part of the paper's central framing and should be addressed before acceptance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Author list] The author list appears to contain the same person twice with different spellings: 'Arianna Pfiffer' (affiliation 9) and 'Arianna Piffer' (affiliation 15). Please verify and unify the spelling.
  2. [References [41] and [42]] References [41] and [42] both cite the BraTS Toolkit paper; these should be merged or disambiguated.
  3. [Reference [13]] Reference [13] is cited for the 'greedy' registration tool, but the listed title is about hippocampal subfield segmentation; the citation appears to be incorrect.
  4. [§2.2 and §3] The module is called 'Modsort' in Section 2.2 but 'Medsort' in Section 3; the naming should be consistent.
  5. [Figure 1 and surrounding text] There is a stray '®' symbol immediately before 'Fig. 1' in the text, and the figure caption placement appears awkward; this is a typesetting issue that should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: BLS is a software-integration description; its module-performance claims rest on externally validated prior work, and no prediction reduces to a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper does not derive quantitative predictions from first principles. Its central claim is architectural: BLS modules can be chained into pipelines (Sections 2 and 3). The only performance statements are (a) citations to previously published, externally validated systems - AURORA in [16,17], GlioMODA, Panoptica [44], and DQE [43] - and (b) an unquantified assertion about the new PeTu model (Section 2.6). Under the review rules, the cited prior results are independent support because they were validated on external multicenter data, not fitted to the present paper's claims. The absence of an integrated end-to-end validation of BLP-preprocessed inputs feeding those models is a missing-evidence and correctness risk, not a circular reduction: no equation in the paper equates BLS output with the modules' published metrics, and no parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction. The PeTu paragraph states relative performance strengths (WT and T2H strong, ET moderate, CC limited) but provides no numbers, dataset, or comparison; this is an unsupported claim, not a self-definitional or fitted-input circularity. The Limitations section (Section 4) explicitly disclaims clinical certification and generalization beyond trained lesion types, which further shows the authors are not claiming a derived universal result. Therefore no load-bearing step reduces to its own input, and the self-citations are used only as pointers to independently validated work.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed effectiveness of previously published components and on unverified claims about the new PeTu model and the preprocessing module. There are no free parameters or invented scientific entities; the paper's dependencies are the validity of the integrated tools and the transferability of their published performance into the BLS framework.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The cited component models achieve the performance claimed in their source papers when used inside BrainLesion Suite.
    Sections 2.3-2.8 describe AURORA, GlioMODA, BraTS orchestrator models, DQE, and Panoptica as state-of-the-art based on their own publications, but the present paper runs no integrated validation to confirm the transfer into BLS pipelines.
  • domain assumption The PeTu pediatric tumor segmentation model performs as qualitatively stated, with strong WT and T2H, moderate ET, and limited CC performance.
    Section 2.6 states these performance levels without reporting metrics, dataset details, or statistical error bars.
  • domain assumption The BLP preprocessing module correctly co-registers, skull-strips, defaces, and normalizes arbitrary multi-modal inputs.
    Section 2.1 describes the module's capabilities but provides no validation images, quality assurance measures, or failure analysis for the preprocessing outputs.
  • domain assumption The framework is cross-platform on Windows, macOS, and Linux as stated.
    Section 2 says cross-platform compatibility is a development priority, but no installation or execution evidence is provided in the manuscript.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BrainLesion Suite: A Flexible and User-Friendly Framework for Modular Brain Lesion Image Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B7F62YSC

@misc{pith2026250709036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BrainLesion Suite: A Flexible and User-Friendly Framework for Modular Brain Lesion Image Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B7F62YSC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.09036}
}
read the original abstract

BrainLesion Suite is a versatile toolkit for building modular brain lesion image analysis pipelines in Python. Following Pythonic principles, BrainLesion Suite is designed to provide a 'brainless' development experience, minimizing cognitive effort and streamlining the creation of complex workflows for clinical and scientific practice. At its core is an adaptable preprocessing module that performs co-registration, atlas registration, and optional skull-stripping and defacing on arbitrary multi-modal input images. BrainLesion Suite leverages algorithms from the BraTS challenge to synthesize missing modalities, inpaint lesions, and generate pathology-specific tumor segmentations. BrainLesion Suite also enables quantifying segmentation model performance, with tools such as panoptica to compute lesion-wise metrics. Although BrainLesion Suite was originally developed for image analysis pipelines of brain lesions such as glioma, metastasis, and multiple sclerosis, it can be adapted for other biomedical image analysis applications. The individual BrainLesion Suite packages and tutorials are accessible on GitHub.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.09036 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The modsort GUI. Users can drag and drop MR files into labeled boxes to manually sort and tag sequences. Files are automatically renamed and structured, reducing errors and streamlining preprocessing. 2.3 BraTS orchestrator: - Algorithms from the BraTS challenge The annual BraTS challenge has, in recent years, fostered the development of in￾novative solutions to clinically relevant problems across different brain tu… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-modal brain MRI preprocessing. Squares indicate registration targets, di￾amonds moving images; outline colors encode varying image spaces. First, the moving modalities are registered from their respective native spaces to the center modality in its native space. Second, the center modality is registered to the target atlas, and the remaining moving modalities are transformed into atlas space using the resultin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview visualizing the different algorithm types available in the BraTS pack￾age with their respective inputs and outputs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Khalaf, and Hesham F.A

    Mahmoud Khaled Abd-Ellah, Ali Ismail Awad, Ashraf A.M. Khalaf, and Hesham F.A. Hamed. A review on brain tumor diagnosis from mri im- ages: Practical implications, key achievements, and lessons learned.Mag- netic Resonance Imaging, 61:300–318, 2019. ISSN 0730-725X. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.028. URL https: //www.sciencedirect.c...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.028 2019

  2. [2]

    Maruf Adewole, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Anu Gbadamosi, Oluyemisi Toyobo, Con- fidence Raymond, Dong Zhang, Olubukola Omidiji, Rachel Akinola, Mo- hammadAbbaSuwaid,AdaobiEmegoakor,NancyOjo,KennethAguh,Chi- nasa Kalaiwo, Gabriel Babatunde, Afolabi Ogunleye, Yewande Gbadamosi, Kator Iorpagher, Evan Calabrese, Mariam Aboian, Marius Linguraru, Jake Albrecht, Benedikt...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Kofler et al

    Hamed Akbari, Spyridon Bakas, Chiharu Sako, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Jose A Garcia, Elizabeth Mamourian, Fang Liu, Quy Cao, Russell T Shinohara, Ujjwal Baid, Alexander Getka, Sarthak Pati, Ashish Singh, Evan Calabrese, Susan Chang, Jeffrey Rudie, Aris- teidis Sotiras, Pamela LaMontagne, Daniel S Marcus, Mikhail Milchenko, Arash Na...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Landman, Geert Litjens, Bjoern Menze, Olaf Ronneberger, Ronald M

    Michela Antonelli, Annika Reinke, Spyridon Bakas, Keyvan Farahani, An- nette Kopp-Schneider, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Bjoern Menze, Olaf Ronneberger, Ronald M. Summers, Bram van Ginneken, Michel Bilello, Patrick Bilic, Patrick F. Christ, Richard K. G. Do, Marc J. Gol- lub, Stephan H. Heckers, Henkjan Huisman, William R. Jarnagin, Mau- reen K. Mc...

    2022

  5. [5]

    Benign-malignant pulmonary nodule classification in low- dose ct with convolutional features.Physica Medica, 83:146–153, 2021

    Mehdi Astaraki, Yousuf Zakko, Iuliana Toma Dasu, Örjan Smedby, and Chunliang Wang. Benign-malignant pulmonary nodule classification in low- dose ct with convolutional features.Physica Medica, 83:146–153, 2021. ISSN 1120-1797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021. 03.013. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1120179721001290

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021 2021

  6. [6]

    Advanced normalization tools (ants)

    Brian B Avants, Nick Tustison, Gang Song, et al. Advanced normalization tools (ants). Insight j, 2(365):1–35, 2009

    2009

  7. [7]

    Kitamura, Sarthak Pati, Luciano M

    Ujjwal Baid, Satyam Ghodasara, Suyash Mohan, Michel Bilello, Evan Cal- abrese, Errol Colak, Keyvan Farahani, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Fe- lipe C. Kitamura, Sarthak Pati, Luciano M. Prevedello, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Chiharu Sako, Russell T. Shinohara, Timothy Bergquist, Rong Chai, James Eddy, Julia Elliott, Walter Reade, Thomas Schaffter, Thomas Yu, Jiaxin Z...

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.Scientific Data, 4 (1):170117, September 2017

    Spyridon Bakas, Hamed Akbari, Aristeidis Sotiras, Michel Bilello, Martin Rozycki, Justin S Kirby, John B Freymann, Keyvan Farahani, and Christos Davatzikos. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.Scientific Data, 4 (1):170117, September 2017

    2017

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Albiol, Varghese Alex, Nigel Allinson, Pedro H

    Spyridon Bakas, Mauricio Reyes, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Markus Rempfler, Alessandro Crimi, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Christoph Berger, Sung Min Ha, Martin Rozycki, Marcel Prastawa, Esther Alberts, Jana Lipkova, John Freymann, Justin Kirby, Michel Bilello, Hassan Fathallah...

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The uni- versity of pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics.Scientific Data, 9(1):453, July 2022

    Spyridon Bakas, Chiharu Sako, Hamed Akbari, Michel Bilello, Aris- teidis Sotiras, Gaurav Shukla, Jeffrey D Rudie, Natali Flores Santa- maría, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Sarthak Pati, Saima Rathore, Elizabeth Mamourian, Sung Min Ha, William Parker, Jimit Doshi, Ujjwal Baid, Mark ...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Thakur, Shahriar Faghani, Mana Moassefi, Ujjwal Baid, Verena Chung, Sarthak Pati, Shubham Innani, Bhakti Baheti, Jake Albrecht, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, MacLean P

    Spyridon Bakas, Siddhesh P. Thakur, Shahriar Faghani, Mana Moassefi, Ujjwal Baid, Verena Chung, Sarthak Pati, Shubham Innani, Bhakti Baheti, Jake Albrecht, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, MacLean P. Nasral- lah, Jared T. Ahrendsen, Valeria Barresi, Maria A. Gubbiotti, Gis...

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bates, Rebecca J

    Rina Bao, Ya’nan Song, Sara V. Bates, Rebecca J. Weiss, Anna N. Foster, Camilo Jaimes Cobos, Susan Sotardi, Yue Zhang, Randy L. Gollub, P. Ellen Grant, and Yangming Ou. Boston neonatal brain injury dataset for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (bonbid-hie): Part i. mri and manua...

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Fast automatic segmentation of hippocampal sub- fields and medial temporal lobe subregions in 3 tesla and 7 tesla t2-weighted mri

    Mark R Battle, Chris J Buckley, Adrian Smith, Koen Van Laere, Rik Van- denberghe, Val J Lowe, Paul A Yushkevich, John Pluta, Hongzhi Wang, Laura EM Wisse, et al. Fast automatic segmentation of hippocampal sub- fields and medial temporal lobe subregions in 3 tesla and 7 tesla t...

    2016

  6. [14]

    Jäger, Fabian Isensee, and Klaus H

    Michael Baumgartner, Paul F. Jäger, Fabian Isensee, and Klaus H. Maier- Hein. nndetection: A self-configuring method for medical object detection. In Marleen de Bruijne, Philippe C. Cattin, Stephane Cotin, Nicolas Padoy, Stefanie Speidel, Yefeng Zheng, and Caroline Essert, edi...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain mr images: A comparative study.Medical Image Analysis, 69:101952,

    Christoph Baur, Stefan Denner, Benedikt Wiestler, Nassir Navab, and Shadi Albarqouni. Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain mr images: A comparative study.Medical Image Analysis, 69:101952,

  8. [16]

    Development and external validation of an mri-based neural network for brain metastasis segmentation in the aurora multicenter study.Radiotherapy and Oncology, 178:109425, 2023

    Josef A Buchner, Florian Kofler, Lucas Etzel, Michael Mayinger, Sebas- tian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Björn Menze, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, et al. Development and external validation of an mri-based neural network for brain metastasis segmentation in the ...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Identifying core mri sequences for reliable automatic brain metastasis segmentation

    JosefABuchner,JanCPeeken,LucasEtzel,IvanEzhov,MichaelMayinger, Sebastian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Bjoern H Menze, Claus Zimmer, et al. Identifying core mri sequences for reliable automatic brain metastasis segmentation. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 188:109901, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Radiomics-based prediction of local control in patients with brain metastases following postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy.Neuro-oncology, page noae098, 2024

    Josef A Buchner, Florian Kofler, Michael Mayinger, Sebastian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Bjoern Menze, Claus Zimmer, Bern- hard Meyer, Matthias Guckenberger, et al. Radiomics-based prediction of local control in patients with brain metastases following postopera...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Frey, Yufan He, William P

    Junyu Chen, Eric C. Frey, Yufan He, William P. Segars, Ye Li, and Yong Du. Transmorph: Transformer for unsupervised medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis, 82:102615, 2022. ISSN 1361-8415. https://doi. org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102615. URL https:// w...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Msseg-2 challenge proceedings: Multiple sclerosis new lesions seg- mentation challenge using a data management and processing infrastruc- ture

    Olivier Commowick, Frédéric Cervenansky, François Cotton, and Michel Dojat. Msseg-2 challenge proceedings: Multiple sclerosis new lesions seg- mentation challenge using a data management and processing infrastruc- ture. In MICCAI 2021-24th international conference on medical i...

    2021

  13. [21]

    Maria Correia de Verdier, Rachit Saluja, Louis Gagnon, Dominic LaBella, Ujjwall Baid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Jikai Zhang, Maram Alafif, Saif Baig, Ken Chang, Gennaro D’Anna, Lisa Deptula, Di- viya Gupta, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Ali Hussain, Michael Iv, Mari- ...

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Tizabi, Fabian Isensee, Tim J

    Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru, Minu D. Tizabi, Fabian Isensee, Tim J. Adler, Sharib Ali, Vincent Andrearczyk, Marc Aubreville, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Niranjan Balu, Sophia Bano, Jorge Bernal, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Alessandro Casella, Veronika Chep- lygi...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Ellingson, Martin Bendszus, Jeffrey Boxerman, Daniel Barbo- riak, Bradley J

    Benjamin M. Ellingson, Martin Bendszus, Jeffrey Boxerman, Daniel Barbo- riak, Bradley J. Erickson, Marion Smits, and et al. Consensus recommen- dations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol in clinical trials. Neuro-Oncol, 17(9):1188–98, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    The radiogenomic and spatiogenomic landscapes of glioblastoma and their relationship to oncogenic drivers.Communications Medicine, 5(1):55, March 2025

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Hamed Akbari, Xiaoju Hu, Vikas Bommineni, Dimitris Grigoriadis, Erik Toorens, Chiharu Sako, Elizabeth Mamourian, Dominique Ballinger, Robyn Sussman, Ashish Singh, Ioannis I Verginadis, Nadia Dahmane, Constantinos Koumenis, Zev A Binder, Stephen J Bagle...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple scle- rosis

    Massimo Filippi, Wolfgang Brück, Declan Chard, Franz Fazekas, Jeroen J G Geurts, Christian Enzinger, Simon Hametner, Tanja Kuhlmann, Paolo Preziosa,ÀlexRovira,KlausSchmierer,ChristineStadelmann,andMariaA Rocca. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple scle...

    2019

  18. [26]

    Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood

    VS Fonov, AC Evans, RC McKinstry, CR Almli, and DL Collins. Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. NeuroImage, 47:S102, 2009. ISSN 1053-8119. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5. URL https://www. sciencedi...

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    Integrating imaging and genomic data for the discovery of distinct glioblas- toma subtypes: a joint learning approach

    Jun Guo, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Erik Toorens, Hamed Akbari, Fanyang Yu, Chiharu Sako, Elizabeth Mamourian, Russell T Shinohara, Constanti- nos Koumenis, Stephen J Bagley, Jennifer J D Morrissette, Zev A Binder, Steven Brem, Suyash Mohan, Robert A Lustig, Donald M O’Rourke, T...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Integrating imaging and genomic data for the discovery of distinct glioblas- BrainLesion Suite 25 toma subtypes: a joint learning approach

    Jun Guo, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Erik Toorens, Hamed Akbari, Fanyang Yu, Chiharu Sako, Elizabeth Mamourian, Russell T Shinohara, Constanti- nos Koumenis, Stephen J Bagley, Jennifer J D Morrissette, Zev A Binder, Steven Brem, Suyash Mohan, Robert A Lustig, Donald M O’Rourke, T...

    2024

  21. [29]

    ISLES 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion seg- mentation dataset

    Moritz R Hernandez Petzsche, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Uta Hanning, Roland Wiest, Waldo Valenzuela, Mauricio Reyes, Maria Meyer, Sook-Lei Liew, Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, David Robben, Alexandre Hutton, Tassilo Friedrich, Teresa Zarth, Johannes Bürkle, The Anh Baran, Björn Menze, ...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Peterson

    Guillermo Horga, Tejal Kaur, and Bradley S. Peterson. Annual research review: Current limitations and future directions in mri studies of child- and adult-onset developmental psychopathologies. Journal of Child Psy- chology and Psychiatry, 55(6):659–680, 2014. https://doi.org/...

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    Rapid, label-free histopathological diagnosis of liver cancer based on raman spectroscopy and deep learning.Nature Com- munications, 14(1):48, January 2023

    Liping Huang, Hongwei Sun, Liangbin Sun, Keqing Shi, Yuzhe Chen, Xue- qian Ren, Yuancai Ge, Danfeng Jiang, Xiaohu Liu, Wolfgang Knoll, Qing- wen Zhang, and Yi Wang. Rapid, label-free histopathological diagnosis of liver cancer based on raman spectroscopy and deep learning.Natu...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Distel, Thomas Weissmann, Michael Uder, Manuel A

    Yixing Huang, Christoph Bert, Philipp Sommer, Benjamin Frey, Udo Gaipl, Luitpold V. Distel, Thomas Weissmann, Michael Uder, Manuel A. Schmidt, Arnd Dörfler, Andreas Maier, Rainer Fietkau, and Florian Putz. Deep learning for brain metastasis detection and segmentation in lon- g...

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Automated brain extraction of multisequence mri using artificial neural networks.Human brain mapping, 40(17):4952– 4964, 2019

    Fabian Isensee, Marianne Schell, Irada Pflueger, Gianluca Brugnara, David Bonekamp, Ulf Neuberger, Antje Wick, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Sabine Hei- land, Wolfgang Wick, et al. Automated brain extraction of multisequence mri using artificial neural networks.Human brain mapping, 4...

    2019

  26. [34]

    nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.Nature Methods, 18(2):203–211, February 2021

    Fabian Isensee, Paul F Jaeger, Simon A A Kohl, Jens Petersen, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.Nature Methods, 18(2):203–211, February 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Fabian Isensee, Tassilo Wald, Constantin Ulrich, Michael Baumgartner, Saikat Roy, Klaus Maier-Hein, and Paul F. Jäger. nnu-net revisited: A call for rigorous validation in 3d medical image segmentation. In Marius George Linguraru,QiDou,AasaFeragen,StamatiaGiannarou,BenGlocker,...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas, Enzo Ferrante, Sarah Parisot, Christian Ledig, Aditya V Nori, Antonio Criminisi, Daniel Rueckert, and Ben Glocker. 26 F. Kofler et al. Deepmedic for brain tumor segmentation. InBrainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries...

    2016

  29. [37]

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Nastaran Khalili, Xinyang Liu, Deep Gandhi, Zhifan Jiang, Syed Muhammed Anwar, Jake Albrecht, Maruf Adewole, Udunna Anazodo, Hannah Anderson, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Austin J. Borja, Evan Calabrese, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, ...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Nastaran Khalili, Xinyang Liu, Debanjan Hal- dar, Zhifan Jiang, Syed Muhammed Anwar, Jake Albrecht, Maruf Adewole, Udunna Anazodo, Hannah Anderson, Sina Bagheri, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Austin J. Borja, Evan Calabrese, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco ...

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Philipp Kickingereder, Fabian Isensee, Irada Tursunova, Jens Petersen, Ulf Neuberger, David Bonekamp, Gianluca Brugnara, Marianne Schell, Tobias Kessler, Martha Foltyn, et al. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of mri in neuro-oncology with artificial neural net...

    2019

  32. [40]

    Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration

    Stefan Klein, Marius Staring, Keelin Murphy, Max A Viergever, and Josien PW Pluim. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 29(1):196–205, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616

    2009

  33. [41]

    Kofler, C

    F. Kofler, C. Berger, D. Waldmannstetter, J. Lipkova, I. Ezhov, G. Tet- teh, and et al. Brats toolkit: Translating brats brain tumor segmentation algorithms into clinical and scientific practice.Front Neurosci, 14:125, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Brats toolkit: translating brats brain tumor segmen- tation algorithms into clinical and scientific practice.Frontiers in neuro- science, 14:125, 2020

    Florian Kofler, Christoph Berger, Diana Waldmannstetter, Jana Lipkova, Ivan Ezhov, Giles Tetteh, Jan Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, and Bjoern H Menze. Brats toolkit: translating brats brain tumor segmen- tation algorithms into clinical and scientific practice.Fron...

    2020

  35. [43]

    Deep quality estimation: Creating surrogate models for human quality ratings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10355, 2022

    Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, Lucas Fidon, Izabela Horvath, Ezequiel de la Rosa, John LaMaster, Hongwei Li, Tom Finck, Suprosanna Shit, Johannes Paetzold, et al. Deep quality estimation: Creating surrogate models for human quality ratings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10355, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Florian Kofler, Hendrik Möller, Josef A. Buchner, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Ivan Ezhov, Marcel Rosier, Isra Mekki, Suprosanna Shit, Moritz Negwer, Rami Al-Maskari, Ali Ertürk, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Fabian Isensee, Sarthak Pati, Daniel Rueckert, Jan S. Kirschke, Stefan K. Ehrlic...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Approaching peak ground truth

    Florian Kofler, Johannes Wahle, Ivan Ezhov, Sophia J Wagner, Rami Al- Maskari, Emilia Gryska, Mihail Todorov, Christina Bukas, Felix Meissen, Tingying Peng, et al. Approaching peak ground truth. In2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 1–6. ...

    2023

  38. [46]

    Paetzold, Ezequiel de da Rosa, Isra Mekki,ShankeethVinayahalingam,HasanKassem,JuexinZhang,KeChen, Ying Weng, Alicia Durrer, Philippe C

    Florian Kofler, Felix Meissen, Felix Steinbauer, Robert Graf, Stefan K Ehrlich, Annika Reinke, Eva Oswald, Diana Waldmannstetter, Florian Hoelzl, Izabela Horvath, Oezguen Turgut, Suprosanna Shit, Christina Bukas, Kaiyuan Yang, Johannes C. Paetzold, Ezequiel de da Rosa, Isra Me...

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    FlorianKofler,MarcelRosier,MehdiAstaraki,UjjwalBaid,HendrikMöller, Josef A. Buchner, Felix Steinbauer, Eva Oswald, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Ivan Ezhov, Constantin von See, Jan Kirschke, Anton Schmick, Sarthak Pati, Akis Linardos, Carla Pitarch, Sanyukta Adap, Jeffrey Rudie, Maria ...

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Nrg brain tumor specialists consensus guidelines for glioblastoma contouring

    Tim J Kruser, Walter R Bosch, Shahed N Badiyan, Joseph A Bovi, Amol J Ghia, Michelle M Kim, Abhishek A Solanki, Sean Sachdev, Christina Tsien, Tony JC Wang, et al. Nrg brain tumor specialists consensus guidelines for glioblastoma contouring. Journal of neuro-oncology, 143:157–...

    2019

  41. [49]

    The asnr-miccai brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: Intracranial meningioma, BrainLesion Suite 29

    Dominic LaBella, Maruf Adewole, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Talissa Altes, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Radhika Bhalerao, Sully Chen, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Devon Godfrey, Fathi Hilal, Ariana Famil- iar, Keyvan...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Reitman, Trey Mullikin, Ulas Bagci, Sean Sachdev, Jona A

    Dominic LaBella, Katherine Schumacher, Michael Mix, Kevin Leu, Shan McBurney-Lin, Pierre Nedelec, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Jonathan Shapey, Tom Vercauteren, Kazumi Chia, Omar Al-Salihi, Justin Leu, Lia Halasz, Yury Velichko, Chunhao Wang, John Kirkpatrick, Scott Floyd, Zachary...

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Hongwei Bran Li, Gian Marco Conte, Qingqiao Hu, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, Koen van Leemput, Marie Piraud, Maria Diaz, Byrone Cole, Evan Calabrese, Jeff Rudie, Felix Meissen, Maruf Adewole, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Dominic LaBella, Ahmed ...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Louis, Al Perry, Guido Reifenberger, Andreas Von Deimling, Do- minique Figarella-Branger, Webster K

    David N. Louis, Al Perry, Guido Reifenberger, Andreas Von Deimling, Do- minique Figarella-Branger, Webster K. Cavenee, and et al. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary.Acta Neuropathol (Berl), 131(6):803–20, 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Louis, Al Perry, Pieter Wesseling, Daniel J

    David N. Louis, Al Perry, Pieter Wesseling, Daniel J. Brat, Ian A. Cree, Dominique Figarella-Branger, and et al. The 2021 who classification of 30 F. Kofler et al. tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-Oncol, 23(8): 1231–51, 2021

    2021

  46. [54]

    Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

    Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Sinan Onogur, Marko Stankovic, Patrick Scholz, Tal Arbel, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Andrew P Bradley, Aaron Carass, et al. Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care. Nature communications,...

    2018

  47. [55]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09011

  48. [56]

    Corso, Antonio Criminisi, Tilak Das, Hervé Delingette, Çağatay Demiralp, Christopher R

    BjoernH.Menze,AndrasJakab,StefanBauer,JayashreeKalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slot- boom, Roland Wiest, Levente Lanczi, Elizabeth Gerstner, Marc-André We- ber,TalArbel,BrianB.Avants,NicholasAyache,PatriciaBuendia,D.Louis Co...

    1993

  49. [57]

    Toward image-based personalization of glioblastoma therapy: A clinical and bi- ological validation study of a novel, deep learning-driven tumor growth model

    Marie-Christin Metz, Ivan Ezhov, Jan C Peeken, Josef A Buchner, Jana Lip- kova, Florian Kofler, Diana Waldmannstetter, Claire Delbridge, Christian Diehl,DeniseBernhardt,FriederikeSchmidt-Graf,JensGempt,StephanieE Combs, Claus Zimmer, Bjoern Menze, and Benedikt Wiestler. Toward...

    2023

  50. [58]

    Outcomes of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone for melanoma brain metastases

    Giuseppe Minniti, Sergio Paolini, Giancarlo D’Andrea, Gaetano Lanzetta, Francesco Cicone, Veronica Confaloni, Alessandro Bozzao, Vincenzo Espos- ito, and Mattia Osti. Outcomes of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity versus stereotactic radiosurgery a...

    2017

  51. [59]

    The multimodal brain tumor image segmen- tation benchmark (brats)

    Bjoern H Menze, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slot- boom, Roland Wiest, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmen- tation benchmark (brats). IEEE transactions on medical imaging, ...

    1993

  52. [60]

    Ahmed W. Moawad, Anastasia Janas, Ujjwal Baid, Divya Ramakrish- nan, Rachit Saluja, Nader Ashraf, Nazanin Maleki, Leon Jekel, Niko- lay Yordanov, Pascal Fehringer, Athanasios Gkampenis, Raisa Amiruddin, Amirreza Manteghinejad, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Ana- zodo, Sa...

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Global image registration using a symmetric block-matching approach.Journal of medical imaging, 1(2):024003–024003, 2014

    Marc Modat, David M Cash, Pankaj Daga, Gavin P Winston, John S Dun- can, and Sébastien Ourselin. Global image registration using a symmetric block-matching approach.Journal of medical imaging, 1(2):024003–024003, 2014

    2014

  54. [62]

    SPINEPS—automatic whole spine segmentation of t2-weighted MR images using a two-phase approach to multi-class semantic and instance segmentation.European Radiology, October 2024

    Hendrik Möller, Robert Graf, Joachim Schmitt, Benjamin Keinert, Hanna Schön, Matan Atad, Anjany Sekuboyina, Felix Streckenbach, Florian Kofler, Thomas Kroencke, Stefanie Bette, Stefan N Willich, Thomas Keil, Thoralf Niendorf, Tobias Pischon, Beate Endemann, Bjoern Menze, Danie...

    2024

  55. [63]

    Niyazi, N

    M. Niyazi, N. Andratschke, M. Bendszus, A.J. Chalmers, S.C. Erridge, N. Galldiks, and et al. Estro-eano guideline on target delineation and ra- diotherapy details for glioblastoma.Radiother Oncol, 184:109663, 2023

    2023

  56. [64]

    Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management

    DK Mitchell, HJ Kwon, PA Kubica, WX Huff, R O’regan, and M Dey. Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management. Neurochirurgie, 68(1):69–85, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    The cancer imaging phenomics toolkit (captk): technical overview

    Sarthak Pati, Ashish Singh, Saima Rathore, Aimilia Gastounioti, Mark Bergman, Phuc Ngo, Sung Min Ha, Dimitrios Bounias, James Minock, Grayson Murphy, et al. The cancer imaging phenomics toolkit (captk): technical overview. InBrainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and ...

    2019

  58. [66]

    Kofler et al

    Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Brandon Edwards, Micah Sheller, Shih-Han Wang, G Anthony Reina, Patrick Foley, Alexey Gruzdev, Deepthi Karkada, Christos Davatzikos, Chiharu Sako, Satyam Ghodasara, Michel Bilello, Suyash Mohan, Philipp Vollmuth, Gianluca Brugnara, Chandrakanth J Pre...

    2022

  59. [67]

    Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection.Nature communications, 13(1):7346, 2022

    Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Brandon Edwards, Micah Sheller, Shih-Han Wang, G Anthony Reina, Patrick Foley, Alexey Gruzdev, Deepthi Karkada, Christos Davatzikos, et al. Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection.Nature communications, 13(1):7346, 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    Pemberton, J

    H.G. Pemberton, J. Wu, I. Kommers, D.M.J. Müller, Y. Hu, O. Goodkin, and et al. Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing mri sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms.Sci Rep, 13 (1):18911, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Reconstructing a 3d structure from serial histological sections

    Sébastien Ourselin, Alexis Roche, Gérard Subsol, Xavier Pennec, and Nicholas Ayache. Reconstructing a 3d structure from serial histological sections. Image and vision computing, 19(1-2):25–31, 2001

    2001

  62. [70]

    The future of digital health with federated learning

    Nicola Rieke, Jonny Hancox, Wenqi Li, Fausto Milletari, Holger R Roth, Shadi Albarqouni, Spyridon Bakas, Mathieu N Galtier, Bennett A Land- man, Klaus Maier-Hein, et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ digital medicine, 3(1):1–7, 2020

    2020

  63. [71]

    S Rogers, B Baumert, O Blanck, D Böhmer, J Boström, R Engenhart- Cabillic, Ekin Ermis, S Exner, M Guckenberger, D Habermehl, et al. Stereo- tactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for resected brain metastases: current pattern of care in the radiosurgery and stereotactic radiothe...

    2022

  64. [72]

    Thesri24multichannelatlasofnormaladulthumanbrainstructure

    Torsten Rohlfing, Natalie M Zahr, Edith V Sullivan, and Adolf Pfefferbaum. Thesri24multichannelatlasofnormaladulthumanbrainstructure. Human brain mapping, 31(5):798–819, 2010

    2010

  65. [73]

    T2w-mri signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibil- ity

    Elisa Scalco, Antonella Belfatto, Alfonso Mastropietro, Tiziana Rancati, Barbara Avuzzi, Antonella Messina, Riccardo Valdagni, and Giovanna BrainLesion Suite 35 Rizzo. T2w-mri signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibil- ity. Medical Physics, 47(4):1680–1691, ...

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    Machine learning based differentiation of glioblastoma from brain metastasis using mri derived radiomics.Scientific reports, 11(1): 10478, 2021

    Sarv Priya, Yanan Liu, Caitlin Ward, Nam H Le, Neetu Soni, Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa, Varun Monga, Honghai Zhang, Milan Sonka, and Girish Bathla. Machine learning based differentiation of glioblastoma from brain metastasis using mri derived radiomics.Scientific re...

    2021

  67. [75]

    Quickshear defacing for neuroimages

    Nakeisha Schimke and John Hale. Quickshear defacing for neuroimages. HealthSec, 11:11, 2011

    2011

  68. [76]

    Fast parallel image registration on cpu and gpu for diagnostic clas- sification of alzheimer’s disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 7:50, 2014

    Denis P Shamonin, Esther E Bron, Boudewijn PF Lelieveldt, Marion Smits, Stefan Klein, Marius Staring, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Ini- tiative. Fast parallel image registration on cpu and gpu for diagnostic clas- sification of alzheimer’s disease.Frontiers in neuroinf...

    2014

  69. [77]

    Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data.Scientific reports, 10(1):12598, 2020

    Micah J Sheller, Brandon Edwards, G Anthony Reina, Jason Martin, Sarthak Pati, Aikaterini Kotrotsou, Mikhail Milchenko, Weilin Xu, Daniel Marcus, Rivka R Colen, et al. Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data....

    2020

  70. [78]

    MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response in meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 159(2):281–291, September 2022

    Herwin Speckter, Marko Radulovic, Kire Trivodaliev, Velicko Vranes, Jo- hanna Joaquin, Wenceslao Hernandez, Angel Mota, Jose Bido, Giancarlo Hernandez, Diones Rivera, Luis Suazo, Santiago Valenzuela, and Peter Stoeter. MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response...

    2022

  71. [79]

    Struc- tural magnetic resonance imaging in the practical assessment of dementia: beyond exclusion

    Philip Scheltens, Nick Fox, Frederik Barkhof, and Charles De Carli. Struc- tural magnetic resonance imaging in the practical assessment of dementia: beyond exclusion. The Lancet Neurology, 1(1):13–21, May 2002

    2002

  72. [80]

    J. Tang, N. Karbhari, and J.L. Campian. Therapeutic targets in glioblas- toma: Molecular pathways, emerging strategies, and future directions.Cells, 14(7):494, 2025

    2025

  73. [81]

    N4itk: improved n3 bias correction

    NicholasJTustison,BrianBAvants,PhilipACook,YuanjieZheng,Alexan- der Egan, Paul A Yushkevich, and James C Gee. N4itk: improved n3 bias correction. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 29(6):1310–1320, 2010

    2010

  74. [82]

    Treatment for brain metastases: Asco-sno-astro guideline, 2022

    Michael A Vogelbaum, Paul D Brown, Hans Messersmith, Priscilla K Bras- tianos, Stuart Burri, Dan Cahill, Ian F Dunn, Laurie E Gaspar, Na Tosha N Gatson, Vinai Gondi, et al. Treatment for brain metastases: Asco-sno-astro guideline, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Transformer-based unsupervised contrastive learning for histopathological image classification

    Xiyue Wang, Sen Yang, Jun Zhang, Minghui Wang, Jing Zhang, Wei Yang, Junzhou Huang, and Xiao Han. Transformer-based unsupervised contrastive learning for histopathological image classification. Medical Image Analysis, 81:102559, 2022. ISSN 1361-8415. https://doi.org/ https://d...

    2022

  76. [84]

    L. Sun, S. Zhang, H. Chen, and L. Luo. Brain tumor segmentation and survival prediction using multimodal mri scans with deep learning.Front Neurosci, 13:810, 2019

    2019

  77. [85]

    Wen and Santosh Kesari

    Patrick Y. Wen and Santosh Kesari. Malignant gliomas in adults.N Engl J Med, 359(5):492–507, 2008

    2008

  78. [86]

    Quality-driven deep active learning method for 3d brain mri segmenta- tion

    Zhenxi Zhang, Jie Li, Chunna Tian, Zhusi Zhong, Zhicheng Jiao, and Xinbo Gao. Quality-driven deep active learning method for 3d brain mri segmenta- tion. Neurocomputing, 446:106–117, 2021. ISSN 0925-2312.https://doi. org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.050. URL https:...

    2021 doi

  79. [89]

    Eano guidelines on 36 F

    Michael Weller, Martin Van Den Bent, Matthias Preusser, Emilie Le Rhun, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Gabriella Minniti, and et al. Eano guidelines on 36 F. Kofler et al. the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood.Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 18(3):170–86, 2021

    2021

  80. [2021]

    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    ISSN 1361-8415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. media.2020.101952. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1361841520303169

    2020

  81. [2023]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07642

    arXiv

  82. [2024]

    ISBN 978-3-031-72114-4

    Springer Nature Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-031-72114-4

  83. [2498]

    URL https://doi

    https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad171. URL https://doi. org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad171

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.