Bridging Brains and Machines: A Unified Frontier in Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuromorphic Systems
Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:34 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Neuroscience principles like synaptic plasticity and sparse signaling are supplying design rules for more efficient and adaptable AGI systems on neuromorphic hardware.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper establishes that neuroscience, artificial general intelligence, and neuromorphic computing are converging toward a single unified research paradigm. Using a framework based in brain physiology, it shows how synaptic plasticity, sparse spike-based communication, and multimodal association offer practical design principles for AGI that can blend human-like and machine capabilities. The review maps historical connectionist models through to modern transformers and multi-agent systems, highlighting parallels with cortical mechanisms and memory consolidation, and points to physical devices such as memristive crossbars and photonic arrays as routes to brain-scale efficiency in silicon.
What carries the argument
The physiology-grounded framework that treats synaptic plasticity, sparse spike-based communication, and multimodal association as core mechanisms for guiding AGI architectures and neuromorphic hardware choices.
If this is right
- AGI systems can achieve continuous lifelong learning without catastrophic forgetting by adopting brain-like plasticity rules.
- Memristive crossbars and in-memory compute arrays can deliver brain-scale energy efficiency by eliminating the von Neumann bottleneck.
- Unifying language processing with sensorimotor learning in embodied agents will require new architectures that mirror multimodal association in the brain.
- Ethical safeguards must be built into neuromorphic autonomous systems from the start to handle their increased independence.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- This convergence suggests that hardware prototypes could be tested directly against biological benchmarks for learning speed and adaptability.
- Progress here may create new roles for neuroscientists in AI development teams focused on validating brain-inspired mechanisms.
- The approach could extend to multi-agent systems where each agent maintains separate episodic-like memory stores for more robust collective behavior.
Load-bearing premise
The observed parallels between brain processes and AI techniques are strong and specific enough to generate reliable, actionable engineering principles rather than loose analogies.
What would settle it
Build a large language model that uses spiking neurons for communication and measure whether it matches standard transformer accuracy on benchmark tasks while consuming at least ten times less energy per inference.
read the original abstract
This position and survey paper identifies the emerging convergence of neuroscience, artificial general intelligence (AGI), and neuromorphic computing toward a unified research paradigm. Using a framework grounded in brain physiology, we highlight how synaptic plasticity, sparse spike-based communication, and multimodal association provide design principles for next-generation AGI systems that potentially combine both human and machine intelligences. The review traces this evolution from early connectionist models to state-of-the-art large language models, demonstrating how key innovations like transformer attention, foundation-model pre-training, and multi-agent architectures mirror neurobiological processes like cortical mechanisms, working memory, and episodic consolidation. We then discuss emerging physical substrates capable of breaking the von Neumann bottleneck to achieve brain-scale efficiency in silicon: memristive crossbars, in-memory compute arrays, and emerging quantum and photonic devices. There are four critical challenges at this intersection: 1) integrating spiking dynamics with foundation models, 2) maintaining lifelong plasticity without catastrophic forgetting, 3) unifying language with sensorimotor learning in embodied agents, and 4) enforcing ethical safeguards in advanced neuromorphic autonomous systems. This combined perspective across neuroscience, computation, and hardware offers an integrative agenda for in each of these fields.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This position and survey paper claims an emerging convergence of neuroscience, AGI, and neuromorphic computing into a unified paradigm. Grounded in brain physiology, it argues that synaptic plasticity, sparse spike-based communication, and multimodal association supply design principles for next-generation systems that integrate human and machine intelligence. The manuscript traces developments from early connectionist models through transformers and foundation models, mapping innovations such as attention mechanisms and pre-training onto cortical processes and episodic consolidation. It reviews hardware substrates (memristive crossbars, in-memory compute, photonic and quantum devices) for brain-scale efficiency and enumerates four challenges: integrating spiking dynamics with foundation models, lifelong plasticity without catastrophic forgetting, unifying language with sensorimotor learning in embodied agents, and enforcing ethical safeguards in neuromorphic autonomous systems.
Significance. If the asserted parallels can be converted into concrete, testable design rules, the synthesis could usefully orient research at the neuroscience-AI-hardware intersection and accelerate development of energy-efficient, lifelong-learning systems. The paper's value lies in its cross-disciplinary framing and explicit listing of open challenges rather than in new empirical results or derivations.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract and framework section] Abstract and opening framework section: the central assertion that neurobiological processes 'provide design principles' for AGI is load-bearing yet remains at the level of asserted analogy without quantitative mapping, ablation evidence, or documented cases in which explicit adoption of the neurobiological framing produced measurable performance or efficiency gains in any of the four challenge domains.
- [Evolution tracing section] Section tracing evolution from connectionist models to transformers: parallels between transformer attention and cortical mechanisms, and between foundation-model pre-training and episodic consolidation, are presented as mirroring neurobiological processes but lack any error analysis, benchmark comparisons, or falsifiable predictions that would allow readers to assess the strength or actionability of the claimed correspondence.
minor comments (2)
- [Challenges section] The four challenges are enumerated but receive only high-level description; adding one or two concrete literature pointers or preliminary solution sketches per challenge would improve clarity without altering scope.
- [Hardware discussion] Notation for hardware substrates (memristive crossbars, in-memory arrays) is introduced without a brief comparison table of energy or latency metrics relative to von Neumann baselines; such a table would aid readers outside neuromorphic hardware.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. The comments correctly identify that our position and survey paper relies on conceptual synthesis rather than new quantitative evidence. We address each major comment below and outline targeted revisions to clarify the scope and evidential basis of the claimed parallels.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract and framework section] Abstract and opening framework section: the central assertion that neurobiological processes 'provide design principles' for AGI is load-bearing yet remains at the level of asserted analogy without quantitative mapping, ablation evidence, or documented cases in which explicit adoption of the neurobiological framing produced measurable performance or efficiency gains in any of the four challenge domains.
Authors: We agree that the central assertion is presented primarily through conceptual mapping rather than direct quantitative validation. As a position and survey paper, the manuscript synthesizes existing literature to propose integrative directions rather than reporting new experiments, ablations, or performance benchmarks. We will revise the abstract and framework section to explicitly frame the neurobiological processes as inspirational design principles supported by cited prior work, while noting the current lack of comprehensive quantitative mappings. Where possible, we will add brief references to documented cases (e.g., sparsity in neuromorphic hardware yielding efficiency gains) to illustrate the practical relevance of the framing without overstating the evidence. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Evolution tracing section] Section tracing evolution from connectionist models to transformers: parallels between transformer attention and cortical mechanisms, and between foundation-model pre-training and episodic consolidation, are presented as mirroring neurobiological processes but lack any error analysis, benchmark comparisons, or falsifiable predictions that would allow readers to assess the strength or actionability of the claimed correspondence.
Authors: The evolution-tracing section provides a historical and conceptual overview drawn from the literature, highlighting interpretive parallels rather than conducting a formal comparative study. We acknowledge that this leaves the strength of the correspondences open to reader interpretation without accompanying error analyses or benchmarks. We will revise this section to include an explicit discussion of the limitations of these analogies, reference any existing comparative studies in the surveyed domains, and add a short forward-looking paragraph proposing specific falsifiable predictions and evaluation approaches that future empirical work could pursue. This addition will help readers gauge actionability while preserving the survey character of the paper. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in survey and position paper
full rationale
This manuscript is a literature review and position statement that surveys parallels between neurobiological processes and AI architectures without any mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictive claims that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central narrative traces historical developments and identifies four challenges but offers no load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes that are justified only internally; all referenced concepts are drawn from the external literature. Because no derivation chain exists to inspect, the paper is self-contained as a descriptive synthesis rather than a formal proof or model.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Brain physiology provides useful design principles for next-generation AGI systems.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Using a framework grounded in brain physiology, we highlight how synaptic plasticity, sparse spike-based communication, and multimodal association provide design principles for next-generation AGI systems
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
The review traces this evolution from early connectionist models to state-of-the-art large language models, demonstrating how key innovations like transformer attention... mirror neurobiological processes
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Santiago ramón y cajal and methods in neurohistology.Trends in neurosciences, 15(7):237–246, 1992
Javier DeFelipe and Edward G Jones. Santiago ramón y cajal and methods in neurohistology.Trends in neurosciences, 15(7):237–246, 1992
work page 1992
- [2]
-
[3]
O. Loewi. Über humorale übertragbarkeit der herznervenwirkung.Pflüger’s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 189(1):239–242
-
[4]
Ivan Petrovich Pavlov.Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Oxford University Press
-
[5]
Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5(4):115–133
-
[6]
Donald O. Hebb. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory.Science Education, 34:336–337, 1950. Published in December 1950
work page 1950
-
[7]
Jamie I Vandenberg and Stephen G Waxman. Hodgkin and huxley and the basis for electrical sig- nalling: a remarkable legacy still going strong.The Journal of physiology, 590(Pt 11):2569, 2012
work page 2012
-
[8]
Recounting the impact of hubel and wiesel.The Journal of physiology, 587(12):2817– 2823, 2009
Robert H Wurtz. Recounting the impact of hubel and wiesel.The Journal of physiology, 587(12):2817– 2823, 2009
work page 2009
-
[9]
Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes
Richard C Atkinson and Richard M Shiffrin. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. InPsychology of learning and motivation, volume 2, pages 89–195. Elsevier, 1968
work page 1968
-
[10]
Alan D. Baddeley and Graham Hitch. Working Memory. In Gordon H. Bower, editor,Psychology of Learning and Motivation, volume 8, pages 47–89. Academic Press
-
[11]
A. M. Turing. Computing machinery and intelligence.Mind, 59(236):433–460, 1950
work page 1950
-
[12]
The past and future of ai.Boston Review, 46(2):139–162, April 2021
Kenneth Taylor. The past and future of ai.Boston Review, 46(2):139–162, April 2021
work page 2021
- [13]
-
[14]
The Rise of Intelligent Machines
Shamik Tiwari. The Rise of Intelligent Machines. InArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Drug Design and Development, pages 1–22. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2024. 53 BRIDGINGBRAINS ANDMACHINES: A UNIFIEDFRONTIER INNEUROSCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,ANDNEUROMORPHICSYSTEMS
work page 2024
-
[15]
Xuanzhe Liu, Diandian Gu, Zhenpeng Chen, Jinfeng Wen, Zili Zhang, Yun Ma, Haoyu Wang, and Xin Jin. Rise of Distributed Deep Learning Training in the Big Model Era: From a Software Engineer- ing Perspective.ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(6):156:1–156:26, September 2023
work page 2023
- [16]
-
[17]
On the Power of Foundation Models
Yang Yuan. On the power of foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16327, 2024. Accepted at ICML 2023
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[18]
Nanyi Fei, Zhiwu Lu, Yizhao Gao, Guoxing Yang, Yuqi Huo, Jingyuan Wen, Haoyu Lu, Ruihua Song, Xin Gao, Tao Xiang, Hao Sun, and Ji-Rong Wen. Towards artificial general intelligence via a multi- modal foundation model.Nature Communications, 13(1):3094, 2022
work page 2022
-
[19]
Rafael Cardeal Tavares. The pragmatic agi era: Recognizing the general intelligence unlocked by trans- formers.https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.31219/osf.io/9ybmw_v1, April 2025. OSF Preprints, DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9ybmw
-
[20]
Raghu Raman, Robin Kowalski, Krishnashree Achuthan, Akshay Iyer, and Prema Nedungadi. Nav- igating artificial general intelligence development: societal, technological, ethical, and brain-inspired pathways.Scientific Reports, 15(1):8443, 2025
work page 2025
-
[21]
Google. Introducing gemini: Our largest and most capable ai model.https://blog.google/ technology/ai/google-gemini-ai/, 2023. Accessed: 2025-06-02
work page 2023
-
[22]
Introducing the next generation of claude.https://www.anthropic.com/news/ claude-3-family, 2024
Anthropic. Introducing the next generation of claude.https://www.anthropic.com/news/ claude-3-family, 2024. Accessed: 2025-06-02
work page 2024
-
[23]
Foundation model.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Foundation_model, 2025
Wikipedia contributors. Foundation model.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Foundation_model, 2025. Accessed: 2025-06-02
work page 2025
-
[24]
Carver Mead.Analog VLSI and neural systems. Addison-Wesley, 1989
work page 1989
-
[25]
Neuromorphic electronic systems.Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10):1629–1636, 1990
Carver Mead. Neuromorphic electronic systems.Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10):1629–1636, 1990
work page 1990
-
[26]
A silicon model of early visual processing.Neural networks, 1(1):91–97, 1988
Misha A Mahowald and Carver A Mead. A silicon model of early visual processing.Neural networks, 1(1):91–97, 1988
work page 1988
-
[27]
PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1992
Misha A Mahowald.VLSI analogs of neuronal visual processing: A synthesis of form and function. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1992
work page 1992
-
[28]
Neuromorphic Sili- con Neuron Circuits
Giacomo Indiveri, Bernabé Linares-Barranco, Tara Julia Hamilton, André van Schaik, Ralph Etienne- Cummings, Tobi Delbruck, Shih-Chii Liu, Piotr Dudek, Philipp Häfliger, Sylvie Renaud, Johannes Schemmel, Gert Cauwenberghs, John Arthur, Kai Hynna, Fopefolu Folowosele, Sylvain Saighi, Teresa Serrano-Gotarredona, Jayawan Wijekoon, Yingxue Wang, and Kwabena Bo...
-
[29]
The silicon retina.Scientific American, 264(5):76–82, 1991
Misha A Mahowald and Carver Mead. The silicon retina.Scientific American, 264(5):76–82, 1991
work page 1991
-
[30]
A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I
Anthony N Burkitt. A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I. homogeneous synaptic input. Biological cybernetics, 95(1):1–19, 2006
work page 2006
-
[31]
A contrast sensitive silicon retina with reciprocal synapses
Kwabena A Boahen and Andreas G Andreou. A contrast sensitive silicon retina with reciprocal synapses. InAdvances in neural information processing systems, volume 4, pages 764–772, 1992
work page 1992
-
[32]
Donald Olding Hebb.The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley, 1949
work page 1949
-
[33]
A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding.Nature, 383(6595):76–78, 1996
Wulfram Gerstner, Richard Kempter, J Leo Van Hemmen, and Hermann Wagner. A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding.Nature, 383(6595):76–78, 1996
work page 1996
-
[34]
Guo-qiang Bi and Mu-ming Poo. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type.Journal of neuroscience, 18(24):10464– 10472, 1998. 54 BRIDGINGBRAINS ANDMACHINES: A UNIFIEDFRONTIER INNEUROSCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,ANDNEUROMORPHICSYSTEMS
work page 1998
-
[35]
Vlsi implementation of spike timing dependent plasticity
Adria Bofill-i Petit and Alan F Murray. Vlsi implementation of spike timing dependent plasticity. In 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37512), volume 5, pages V–121. IEEE, 2004
work page 2004
-
[36]
Giacomo Indiveri, Elisabetta Chicca, and Rodney Douglas. A vlsi array of low-power spiking neurons and bistable synapses with spike-timing dependent plasticity.IEEE Transactions on neural networks, 17(1):211–221, 2006
work page 2006
-
[37]
Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address events
Kwabena A Boahen. Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address events. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 47(5):416–434, 2000
work page 2000
-
[38]
Massimo A. Sivilotti.Wiring considerations in analog VLSI systems, with application to field- programmable networks. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1991
work page 1991
-
[39]
John Backus. Can programming be liberated from the von neumann style?: a functional style and its algebra of programs.Communications of the ACM, 21(8):613–641, 1978
work page 1978
-
[40]
Ben V Benjamin, Peiran Gao, Emmett McQuinn, Swadesh Choudhary, Anand R Chandrasekaran, Jean-Marie Bussat, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, John V Arthur, Paul A Merolla, and Kwabena Boahen. Neurogrid: A mixed-analog-digital multichip system for large-scale neural simulations.Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(5):699–716, 2014
work page 2014
-
[41]
Paul A Merolla, John V Arthur, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, Andrew S Cassidy, Jun Sawada, Filipp Akopyan, Bryan L Jackson, Nabil Imam, Chen Guo, Yutaka Banda, et al. A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface.Science, 345(6197):668–673, 2014
work page 2014
-
[42]
The spinnaker project.Proceed- ings of the IEEE, 102(5):652–665, 2014
Steve B Furber, Francesco Galluppi, Steve Temple, and Luis A Plana. The spinnaker project.Proceed- ings of the IEEE, 102(5):652–665, 2014
work page 2014
-
[43]
A wafer-scale neuromorphic hardware system for large-scale neural modeling
Johannes Schemmel, Andreas Grübl, Karlheinz Meier, and Eva Mueller. A wafer-scale neuromorphic hardware system for large-scale neural modeling. In2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pages 1947–1950. IEEE, 2010
work page 1947
-
[44]
Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning.IEEE Micro, 38(1):82–99, 2018
Mike Davies, Narayan Srinivasa, Tsung-Han Lin, Gautham Chinya, Yongqiang Cao, Sri Harsha Cho- day, Georgios Dimou, Prasad Joshi, Nabil Imam, Shweta Jain, et al. Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning.IEEE Micro, 38(1):82–99, 2018
work page 2018
-
[45]
Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5(4):115–133, December 1943
work page 1943
-
[46]
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities
J J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. 79(8):2554–2558
-
[47]
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
C E Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communication
-
[48]
Some informational aspects of visual perception
Fred Attneave. Some informational aspects of visual perception. 61(3):183–193
-
[49]
H. B. Barlow. Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages. In Walter A. Rosenblith, editor,Sensory Communication, pages 216–234. The MIT Press
-
[50]
F. Rosenblatt. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. 65(6):386–408
-
[51]
David C. Knill and Alexandre Pouget. The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. 27(12):712–719
-
[52]
Papert.Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry
Marvin Minsky and Seymour A. Papert.Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. The MIT Press
-
[53]
Carver Mead and Mohammed Ismail, editors.Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems, vol- ume 80 ofThe Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Springer US
-
[54]
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Teuvo Kohonen. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. 43(1):59–69. 55 BRIDGINGBRAINS ANDMACHINES: A UNIFIEDFRONTIER INNEUROSCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,ANDNEUROMORPHICSYSTEMS
-
[55]
Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, pages 5998–6008, 2017
work page 2017
-
[56]
Hosseini, Nancy Kan- wisher, Joshua B
Martin Schrimpf, Idan Asher Blank, Greta Tuckute, Carina Kauf, Eghbal A. Hosseini, Nancy Kan- wisher, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Evelina Fedorenko. The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing. 118(45):e2105646118
-
[57]
Hosseini, Martin Schrimpf, Yian Zhang, Samuel Bowman, Noga Zaslavsky, and Evelina Fedorenko
Eghbal A. Hosseini, Martin Schrimpf, Yian Zhang, Samuel Bowman, Noga Zaslavsky, and Evelina Fedorenko. Artificial Neural Network Language Models Predict Human Brain Responses to Language Even After a Developmentally Realistic Amount of Training. 5(1):43–63
-
[58]
Talking to the brain: Using Large Language Models as Proxies to Model Brain Semantic Representation
Xin Liu, Ziyue Zhang, and Jingxin Nie. Talking to the brain: Using Large Language Models as Proxies to Model Brain Semantic Representation
-
[59]
Byung-Doh Oh and William Schuler. Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?
-
[60]
Leo Kozachkov, Ksenia V . Kastanenka, and Dmitry Krotov. Building transformers from neurons and astrocytes. 120(34):e2219150120
-
[61]
Ian T. Ellwood. Short-term Hebbian learning can implement transformer-like attention. 20(1):e1011843
-
[62]
A Biologically Inspired Attention Model for Neural Signal Analysis
Nicolas Skatchkovsky, Natalia Glazman, Sadra Sadeh, and Florencia Iacaruso. A Biologically Inspired Attention Model for Neural Signal Analysis
-
[63]
Multihead self-attention in cortico-thalamic circuits
Arno Granier and Walter Senn. Multihead self-attention in cortico-thalamic circuits
-
[64]
Lyle Muller, Patricia S. Churchland, and Terrence J. Sejnowski. Transformers and cortical waves: Encoders for pulling in context across time. 47(10):788–802
-
[65]
Jea Kwon, Sungjun Lim, Kyungwoo Song, and C. Justin Lee. Brain-inspired lp-convolution benefits large kernels and aligns better with visual cortex. 2025. Accepted at ICLR 2025
work page 2025
-
[66]
Mechanisms of circumferential gyral convolution in primate brains
Tuo Zhang, Mir Jalil Razavi, Hanbo Chen, Yujie Li, Xiao Li, Longchuan Li, Lei Guo, Xiaoping Hu, Tianming Liu, and Xianqiao Wang. Mechanisms of circumferential gyral convolution in primate brains. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 42(3):217–229, 2024
work page 2024
-
[67]
Huth, prefix=de useprefix=true family=Heer, given=Wendy A., Thomas L
Alexander G. Huth, prefix=de useprefix=true family=Heer, given=Wendy A., Thomas L. Griffiths, Frédéric E. Theunissen, and Jack L. Gallant. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. 532(7600):453–458
-
[68]
Shuo Tang, Wei Li, Ying Liu, and Haoran Zhou. Brain transformers: Integrating spiking neu- ral networks with large language models for energy-efficient sequence modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12345, 2024
-
[69]
Lena Smirnova, Brian S. Caffo, David H. Gracias, Qi Huang, Itzy E. Morales Pantoja, Bohao Tang, Donald J. Zack, Cynthia A. Berlinicke, J. Lomax Boyd, Timothy D. Harris, Erik C. Johnson, Brett J. Kagan, Jeffrey Kahn, Alysson R. Muotri, Barton L. Paulhamus, Jens C. Schwamborn, Jesse Plotkin, Alexander S. Szalay, Joshua T. V ogelstein, Paul F. Worley, and Th...
-
[70]
Organoid intelligence and biocomputing advances: Current steps and future directions
Al-Hassan Soliman Wadan. Organoid intelligence and biocomputing advances: Current steps and future directions. 3:8–14
-
[71]
Scharf-Deering, and Jeantine E
Insoo Hyun, J.C. Scharf-Deering, and Jeantine E. Lunshof. Ethical Issues Related to Brain Organoid Research. 1732:146653
-
[72]
Meta-Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with Reward-Modulated STDP
Arsham Gholamzadeh Khoee, Alireza Javaheri, Saeed Reza Kheradpisheh, and Mohammad Gan- jtabesh. Meta-Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with Reward-Modulated STDP
-
[73]
Mike Davies, Josh Sullivan, Yolo Khwa, et al. Loihi 2: A neuromorphic processor with increased channel capacity and embedded processor cores.IEEE Micro, 43(4):12–23, 2023
work page 2023
-
[74]
Smith, Trevor Bihl, and Jundong Liu
Ye Yue, Marc Baltes, Nidal Abujahar, Tao Sun, Charles D. Smith, Trevor Bihl, and Jundong Liu. Hybrid Spiking Neural Network Fine-tuning for Hippocampus Segmentation. 56 BRIDGINGBRAINS ANDMACHINES: A UNIFIEDFRONTIER INNEUROSCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,ANDNEUROMORPHICSYSTEMS
-
[75]
Rui-Jie Zhu, Qihang Zhao, Guoqi Li, and Jason K. Eshraghian. SpikeGPT: Generative Pre-trained Language Model with Spiking Neural Networks
-
[76]
Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformer
Zhaokun Zhou, Yuesheng Zhu, Chao He, Yaowei Wang, Shuicheng Yan, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan. Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformer
-
[77]
SpikingBERT: Distilling BERT to Train Spiking Language Models Using Implicit Differentiation
Malyaban Bal and Abhronil Sengupta. SpikingBERT: Distilling BERT to Train Spiking Language Models Using Implicit Differentiation. 38(10):10998–11006
-
[78]
Jens E. Pedersen, Steven Abreu, Matthias Jobst, Gregor Lenz, Vittorio Fra, Felix Christian Bauer, Dy- lan Richard Muir, Peng Zhou, Bernhard V ogginger, Kade Heckel, Gianvito Urgese, Sadasivan Shankar, Terrence C. Stewart, Sadique Sheik, and Jason K. Eshraghian. Neuromorphic intermediate representa- tion: A unified instruction set for interoperable brain-i...
-
[79]
Yangfan Hu, Qian Zheng, Guoqi Li, Huajin Tang, and Gang Pan. Toward large-scale spiking neural networks: A comprehensive survey and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02111, 2024
-
[80]
Brain-inspired wiring economics for artificial neural networks
Xin-Jie Zhang, Jack Murdoch Moore, Ting-Ting Gao, Xiaozhu Zhang, and Gang Yan. Brain-inspired wiring economics for artificial neural networks. 4(1):pgae580
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.