Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

A Roadmap for Climate-Relevant Robotics Research

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This roadmap identifies concrete, high-impact opportunities where robotics research, both physical robots and the algorithmic robotics toolkit, can contribute to climate mitigation, adaptation, and science across six major domains.

desk verdict A genuinely useful roadmap for robotics-climate work, well-organized and honest about its limits, but its 'high-impact' selection rests on an informal process that could lean supply-push. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11623 v2 pith:WBSYP6MR submitted 2025-07-15 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY

Alan Papalia , Charles Dawson , Laurentiu L. Anton , Norhan Magdy Bayomi , Bianca Champenois , Jung-Hoon Cho , Levi Cai , Joseph DelPreto
show 20 more authors
Kristen Edwards Bilha-Catherine Githinji Cameron Hickert Vindula Jayawardana Matthew Kramer Shreyaa Raghavan David Russell Shide Salimi Jingnan Shi Soumya Sudhakar Yanwei Wang Shouyi Wang Luca Carlone Vijay Kumar Daniela Rus John E. Fernandez Cathy Wu George Kantor Derek Young Hanumant Singh
This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords climatechangeroboticsroadmapenergysystemsbuiltenvironmenttransportationprecisionagricultureenvironmentalmonitoringEarth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to close the gap between climate-curious roboticists and the climate problems that need their skills. It argues that there are concrete, actionable ways for robotics research to contribute to climate solutions and organizes them into a map spanning six climate domains: energy, the built environment, transportation, industry, land use, and Earth systems. A central move is widening the definition of robotics beyond physical machines to include the algorithmic toolkit researchers already use, such as planning, perception, control, and estimation. The paper is explicitly an invitation and a starting point, not an exhaustive survey, and its value would lie in steering research effort and seeding collaborations between robotics and climate domain experts.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a domain-by-discipline matrix that crosses six climate domains, namely energy, the built environment, transportation, industry, land use, and Earth systems, with six robotics subfields: perception, planning, control, estimation, manipulation, and field robotics. Each domain section follows a fixed structure: an executive summary, background on the domain's climate relevance and stakeholders, specific climate challenges, the robotics subfields that can address each challenge, and 'Future Directions' boxes proposing concrete research problems. The matrix carries the argument by giving a roboticist a way to locate their own expertise against climate problems and see where they could contribute, which is what makes the roadmap actionable rather than merely descriptive.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to survey a broader, independent panel of climate practitioners across the six domains, such as energy operators, building managers, farmers, port authorities, and oceanographers, and ask them to rank the bottlenecks that most limit climate progress in their sector; if the problems this roadmap highlights consistently fall outside the practitioners' stated top bottlenecks, the claim that these are the high-impact intersections would be undercut. A narrower empirical check already flagged by the paper is whether automation-driven efficiency gains in road transport are offset by induced demand, which would falsify the transportation section's implied emissions benefit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that specific, high-impact problems exist at the intersection of robotics and climate where the robotics community is well positioned to contribute, and that these problems can be systematically identified and organized. It asserts that contributions can come from deploying physical robots, such as drones for power-line and wildfire inspection, ground robots for crop monitoring, and automated systems for solar construction and disassembly, and equally from transferring robotics algorithms into climate domains, such as state estimation for the power grid, adaptive sampling for ocean science, controls for building energy management, and planning for contrail-avoiding flight routing. The roadmap is built from expert discussions between roboticists and climate-domain specialists and deliberately declines to rank directions by importance, arguing that comparisons across disparate problems like Arctic ice melt and grid resilience are subjective and misleading. What the paper offers instead is a curated map of promising intersections, organized so that researchers in any of six core robotics subfields can locate themselves and find entry points.

Load-bearing premise

The whole roadmap rests on the assumption that the expert interviews and literature scan surfaced the genuinely high-impact opportunities, since the paper selects directions by importance without measuring impact quantitatively or claiming exhaustiveness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Robotics researchers in any of the six core subfields can find climate-relevant problems to work on without first becoming climate domain experts.
  • Algorithmic robotics contributions such as grid state estimation, adaptive sampling, building thermal modeling, and contrail-aware routing can advance climate goals even in settings where no physical robot is deployed.
  • Concrete climate needs, including integrating distributed energy resources into the grid, retrofitting existing buildings, monitoring methane leaks, and adapting to wildfire risk, become defined research targets that could draw new funding and collaboration into the robotics community.
  • Because the paper deliberately does not rank directions, its main practical effect would be to seed new collaborations between roboticists and climate domain experts, which the authors identify as the intended channel for impact.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the roadmap would be to track whether the named problems become research targets over the next several years; the paper's claim implies these directions should attract and absorb research effort more readily than problems left off the map.
  • The paper's refusal to rank directions leaves open a complementary exercise it explicitly sidesteps: a prioritization study using quantitative impact metrics, such as emissions-reduction potential per research dollar, that could help funders allocate resources across the six domains.
  • The framing that it is not only robots but also roboticists who can contribute suggests the bottleneck is translation between communities rather than hardware maturity; if that is right, then workshops, shared benchmarks, and domain glossaries could be as impactful as new robots.
  • Some identified benefits carry rebound risks the paper itself flags, such as smarter traffic control inducing more driving, so the roadmap's net-emissions claims would need system-level evaluation rather than per-vehicle efficiency measures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a roadmap for climate-relevant robotics research, organized around six climate domains (energy, built environment, transportation, industry, land use, Earth systems) and six robotics subfields (perception, planning, control, estimation, manipulation, field robotics). It draws on expert discussions and literature to curate research opportunities, explicitly declining to rank them or claim exhaustive coverage. The paper's stated goal is to help roboticists identify actionable problems and to foster collaboration with domain experts.

Significance. If the curated directions are representative, the roadmap provides a useful bridge between robotics and climate research, complementing prior roadmaps in machine learning and control. Strengths include transparent non-exhaustiveness, a stakeholder-aware treatment of the energy sector, inclusion of both physical robots and the computational robotics toolkit, and a diverse author list spanning robotics and climate domains. The roadmap stops short of a systematic selection methodology or any quantitative impact assessment, so its practical value hinges on the credibility of the curation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1.2] The selection process behind the 'high-impact' directions is underspecified. The paper states that directions were 'selected based on recurring themes in expert interviews and the literature, filtering for importance without claiming exhaustiveness,' but it does not report how experts were recruited, how many were interviewed, how interviews were structured or coded, or how 'importance' was operationalized. Without this information, a reader cannot assess selection bias or reproducibility, and the roadmap's central claim of identifying high-impact directions is not verifiable. I recommend adding a methodology appendix that documents the expert panel, the elicitation protocol, and the criteria used to filter themes.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1.2] The term 'high-impact' is used as a central evaluative claim, yet the paper provides no definition of impact (e.g., emissions-reduction potential, cost-effectiveness, scalability, time horizon) and explicitly declines to rank directions in Section 1.2. While non-ranking avoids false precision, the qualitative filter for importance remains an unexplained judgment call. Please add an explicit statement that impact assessments are qualitative expert judgments, and where possible, support each domain section with at least indicative metrics from cited sources (e.g., emissions shares, cost multipliers, deployment bottlenecks) so readers can calibrate the claims.
  3. [Sections 1.1 and 2.1.1] The roadmap risks a supply-push bias: it catalogs problems where robotics capabilities exist, without systematically checking whether robotics is the binding constraint. Section 1.1 correctly notes that if policy is the limiting factor, further technical work may have limited impact, and Section 2.1.1 states that grid integration, not construction, is currently the bottleneck for renewable deployment. Yet construction and inspection robotics still feature prominently in Section 2.6. The paper should apply a more structured demand-pull filter; for each proposed direction, explicitly identify the bottleneck (technology, cost, regulation, workforce, infrastructure) and indicate whether robotics can plausibly relax it. This would make the roadmap more actionable and reduce the risk of overinvesting in directions with limited climate leverage.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.3, Table 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: 'does not try to list exhaustively list all possible intersections' should be 'does not try to list exhaustively all possible intersections'.
  2. [Section 2.2.3] There is a missing space in 'typically involvedevelopers'; it should read 'typically involve developers'.
  3. [Section 3.1.5] The word 'recylcing' appears in the text; it should be 'recycling'.
  4. [Section 4.1.1] The phrase 'interal combustion engines' should be corrected to 'internal combustion engines'.
  5. [Figure 1] The figure is extremely dense and difficult to read; consider rendering it at higher resolution or splitting it into per-domain panels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the roadmap is an expert synthesis whose central claims are editorial selections, not derivations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking roadmap and expert synthesis. It explicitly disclaims ranking and states that directions were selected based on recurring themes in expert interviews and the literature, filtering for importance without claiming exhaustiveness. No equation or parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to force a particular choice. The roadmap's content is organized around six climate domains and six robotics subfields, but this organization is presented as a structuring device, not as a derived result. Citations to prior work, including similar efforts in adjacent communities, are used as background and inspiration rather than as the load-bearing justification for the paper's recommendations. The claim that the selected directions are high-impact is an editorial judgment with a stated selection procedure; whether that procedure is representative or well-supported is a question of empirical and methodological support, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The paper's assumptions are the motivational premise that robotics can help address climate change and that the chosen methodology (expert discussions and literature) yields reliable priorities.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Robotics and autonomy research can meaningfully contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation.
    This is the paper's foundational premise, stated in the abstract and throughout. It is not proven, but it is a reasonable motivational starting point for a roadmap.
  • domain assumption Expert interviews and thematic literature review are a valid basis for identifying high-impact research directions.
    The paper relies on this methodology without providing a formal protocol or validation. It is a common approach in roadmap papers, but it is an assumption about the quality and representativeness of the sources.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Roadmap for Climate-Relevant Robotics Research." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBSYP6MR

@misc{pith2026250711623,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Roadmap for Climate-Relevant Robotics Research},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBSYP6MR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11623}
}
read the original abstract

Climate change is one of the defining challenges of the 21st century, and many in the robotics community are looking for ways to contribute. This paper presents a roadmap for climate-relevant robotics research, identifying high-impact opportunities for collaboration between roboticists and experts across climate domains such as energy, the built environment, transportation, industry, land use, and Earth sciences. These applications include problems such as energy systems optimization, construction, precision agriculture, building envelope retrofits, autonomous trucking, and large-scale environmental monitoring. Critically, we include opportunities to apply not only physical robots but also the broader robotics toolkit - including planning, perception, control, and estimation algorithms - to climate-relevant problems. A central goal of this roadmap is to inspire new research directions and collaboration by highlighting specific, actionable problems at the intersection of robotics and climate. This work represents a collaboration between robotics researchers and domain experts in various climate disciplines, and it serves as an invitation to the robotics community to bring their expertise to bear on urgent climate priorities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11623 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An overview of climate change challenges along with selected opportunities for high-impact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. This section summarizes the challenges of energy sector decarbonization, covering challenges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Energy flow diagram from primary energy source to end use [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A diagram of the electric power sector, showing both physical infrastructure (generation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An illustration of the complex inter￾actions between power systems stakeholders. The electric power sector is notoriously complex, with many interacting stakeholders and a mix of market-based mechanisms and regulatory oversight that varies by region. These stakeholders…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The climate-relevant challenges in transportation systems and opportunities for robotics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Across the material lifecycle, we identify opportunities for robotics to help reduce waste by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The embodied energy of different common materials. Lower embodied energy means less [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The electricity requirement [J/kg] for different manufacturing processes vs. their process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions for autonomy in the land use sector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: An overview of the discussion in this section. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Common autonomous and semi-autonomous platforms used for monitoring of Earth systems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_12.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [Irf19] Umair Irfan

    url: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_ WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf. [Irf19] Umair Irfan. America is warming fast. See how your city’s weather will be different by

    work page

  2. [2]

    Robotic drill systems for planetary exploration

    url: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_ WGIII_TechnicalSummary.pdf. [Pau+06] Gale Paulsen et al. “Robotic drill systems for planetary exploration”. In: Space 2006. 2006, p. 7512. [Pau+13] Liam Paull et al. “AUV navigation and localization: A review”. In: IEEE Journal of oceanic engineering39.1 (2013), pp. 131–149. [Pav+11] Marco...

    work page arXiv 2013

  3. [6]

    InferringtheMostProbableMapsofUndergroundUtilitiesUsing Bayesian Mapping Model

    doi: 10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183679. (Visited on 05/07/2025). [Bil+18] MuhammadBilaletal.“InferringtheMostProbableMapsofUndergroundUtilitiesUsing Bayesian Mapping Model”. In:Journal of Applied Geophysics150 (Mar. 2018), pp. 52–66. issn: 0926-9851. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.01.006. (Visited on 02/04/2025). [BK19] B. Burchfiel and G. Konidaris. “Probabil...

    work page arXiv 2019

  4. [8]

    Augmenting coral adaptation to climate change via coral gardening (the nursery phase)

    url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3499-8 (visited on 10/23/2024). [Rin21] Baruch Rinkevich. “Augmenting coral adaptation to climate change via coral gardening (the nursery phase)”. en. In:J. Environ. Manage.291.112727 (Aug. 2021), p. 112727. [Rit23] Hannah Ritchie. “Which form of transport has the smallest carbon footprint?” In: Our World in Data(20...

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [11]

    ASAP: Automated Sequence Planning for Complex Robotic As- sembly with Physical Feasibility

    issn: 0730-0301, 1557-7368. doi: 10.1145/3550454.3555525 . arXiv: 2211.03977 [cs]. url: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03977 (visited on 10/23/2024). [Tia+24] Yunsheng Tian et al. “ASAP: Automated Sequence Planning for Complex Robotic As- sembly with Physical Feasibility”. In:2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). May 2024, pp. 4...

    arXiv 2008

  6. [12]

    Field Deployment of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Based Variable Speed Limit Controllers

    doi: 10.1109/JOE.2024.3408889. [Zha+24d] Yuhang Zhang et al. “Field Deployment of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Based Variable Speed Limit Controllers”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08021(2024). [Zha21] Liang Zhang. “Data-Driven Building Energy Modeling with Feature Selection and Ac- tive Learning for Data Predictive Control”. In:Energy and Buildings...

    arXiv 2024

  7. [13]

    Dynamic stochastic electric vehicle routing with safe reinforcement learning

    url: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_ WGIII_Chapter11.pdf. [Bas+22b] Rafael Basso et al. “Dynamic stochastic electric vehicle routing with safe reinforcement learning”. In: Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review157 (2022), p. 102496. [Bau+22] Dominik Bauer et al. “Towards very low-cost iterative pr...

    work page 2022

  8. [22]

    Will a radical transport pricing reform jeopardize the ambitious EU climate change objectives?

    (Visited on 05/09/2025). [Pro+09a] Stef Proost et al. “Will a radical transport pricing reform jeopardize the ambitious EU climate change objectives?” In:Energy policy37.10 (2009), pp. 3863–3871. 143 [Pro+09b] Andrey Proshutinsky et al. “Beaufort Gyre freshwater reservoir: State and variability from observations”. In:Journal of Geophysical Research: Ocean...

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06975 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [24]

    Multi-robot Dubins coverage with autonomous surface vehicles

    arXiv: 2102.01825 [cs.RO]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01825. [Kan+23] JKrishnaKantetal. An Autonomous Hybrid Drone-Rover Vehicle for Weed Removal and Spraying Applications in Agriculture. 2023. arXiv: 2308.04794 [cs.RO] . url: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2308.04794. [Kar+18] N...

    2024 arXiv

  2. [59]

    Extending automation of building construction–Survey on potential sensor technologies and robotic applications

    doi: 10.1109/TEC.2013.2295168. (Visited on 05/16/2025). [Väh+13] Pentti Vähä et al. “Extending automation of building construction–Survey on potential sensor technologies and robotic applications”. In:Automation in construction36 (2013), pp. 168–178. [Van+13] Martin Vancoppeno...

    2013

  3. [83]

    A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to ana- lyze nano-and microplankton: Imaging FlowCytobot

    issn: 1309-1042.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.07.002. url: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104217300351. [OS07] Robert J Olson and Heidi M Sosik. “A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to ana- lyze nano-and microplankton: Imaging FlowCytobo...

    2007 doi arXiv

  4. [90]

    Development of an artificial intelligence model to recognise construc- tion waste by applying image data augmentation and transfer learning

    issn: 0142-0615. doi: 10.1016/0142-0615(91)90030-Y. (Visited on 05/07/2025). [Na+22] Seunguk Na et al. “Development of an artificial intelligence model to recognise construc- tion waste by applying image data augmentation and transfer learning”. In:Buildings 12.2 (2022), p. 17...

    2022

  5. [108]

    Mapping of Potential Fuel Regions Using Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles for Wildfire Prevention

    doi: 10.1109/SII52469.2022.9708734 . url: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ abstract/document/9708734 (visited on 09/05/2024). [And+23] Maria Eduarda Andrada et al. “Mapping of Potential Fuel Regions Using Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles for Wildfire Prevention”. en. In:Forests 14.8 (Aug....

    2001

  6. [166]

    Robustness of multi-agent formation based on natural connec- tivity

    issn: 2573-5144. doi: 10 . 1146 / annurev - control - 061520 - 010504. (Visited on 10/03/2024). [Den+20] ZhengHong Deng et al. “Robustness of multi-agent formation based on natural connec- tivity”. In:Applied Mathematics and Computation366 (2020), p. 124636. [DF23a] Charles Da...

    2020

  7. [207]

    Robotic Waste Sorting Technology: Toward a Vision-Based Categorization System for the Industrial Robotic Separation of Recyclable Waste

    issn: 1674-9278. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2018.09.001. (Visited on 05/18/2025). [Kos+21] Maria Koskinopoulou et al. “Robotic Waste Sorting Technology: Toward a Vision-Based Categorization System for the Industrial Robotic Separation of Recyclable Waste”. In: IEEE Robotics & Automa...

    2021

  8. [262]

    Global in situ observations of essential climate and ocean variables at the air–sea interface

    issn: 0926-5805. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.007. (Visited on 07/03/2025). [Cen+19] Luca R Centurioni et al. “Global in situ observations of essential climate and ocean variables at the air–sea interface”. In:Frontiers in Marine Science6 (2019), p. 419. [Cennd] Center for Cl...

    2019 arXiv

  9. [276]

    Trendsandvariabilityintheoceancarbonsink

    issn: 0015-752X. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpac043 . eprint: https://academic. oup.com/forestry/article- pdf/96/2/264/49572621/cpac043.pdf . url: https: //doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpac043. [Gru+23] NicolasGruberetal.“Trendsandvariabilityintheoceancarbonsink”.In: Nature Reviews Ear...

    2023

  10. [283]

    Comparison of Impedance Based Fault Location Methods for Power Distribution Systems

    isbn: 978-3-319-89378-5. doi: 10 . 1007 / 978 - 3 - 319 - 89378 - 5 _ 10. (Visited on 08/24/2024). [MMC08] J. Mora-Flòrez, J. Meléndez, and G. Carrillo-Caicedo. “Comparison of Impedance Based Fault Location Methods for Power Distribution Systems”. In:Electric Power Systems Res...

    2019

  11. [445]

    A technique for objective analysis and design of oceanographic experiments applied to MODE-73

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13121.eprint: https://besjournals. onlinelibrary . wiley . com / doi / pdf / 10 . 1111 / 2041 - 210X . 13121. url: https : //besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/2041-210X.13121. [BDF76] Francis P. Bretherton, Russ E. Davis...

    2011

  12. [472]

    Information-theoretic mapping using cauchy-schwarz quadratic mutual information

    doi: 10 . 3390 / agriculture14112057. url: https : / / www . mdpi . com / 2077 - 0472/14/11/2057. [Cha+15] Benjamin Charrow et al. “Information-theoretic mapping using cauchy-schwarz quadratic mutual information”. In:2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- t...

    2017 arXiv

  13. [501]

    RobustLocomotionExploitingMultipleBalanceStrategies:AnObserver- Based Cascaded Model Predictive Control Approach

    issn: 2662-1355. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9. url: https://doi.org/10. 1038/s43016-021-00322-9. [Din+22a] JiataoDingetal.“RobustLocomotionExploitingMultipleBalanceStrategies:AnObserver- Based Cascaded Model Predictive Control Approach”. In:IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatr...

    2022

  14. [612]

    Flight of the robobees

    issn: 1949-3061. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2749369. (Visited on 09/29/2024). [WNW13] Robert Wood, Radhika Nagpal, and Gu-Yeon Wei. “Flight of the robobees”. In:Scientific American 308.3 (2013), pp. 60–65. [Wöl+19] Anne-CathrinWölfletal.“Seafloormapping–thechallengeofatrulyglobaloc...

    2013

  15. [747]

    Optimising public bus transit net- works using deep reinforcement learning

    issn: 1543-5938, 1545-2050. doi: 10 . 1146 / annurev - environ - 020220 - 061831. (Visited on 07/29/2024). [DKB20] Ahmed Darwish, Momen Khalil, and Karim Badawi. “Optimising public bus transit net- works using deep reinforcement learning”. In:2020 IEEE 23rd International Confe...

    2018

  16. [825]

    Atmospheric ship emissions in ports: A review. Correlation with data of ship traffic

    doi: 10.3390/act12020057. url: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/12/2/57. [TKR22] Gabriel Tseng, Hannah Kerner, and David Rolnick. TIML: Task-Informed Meta-Learning for Agriculture. 2022. arXiv:2202.02124 [cs.LG]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202. 02124. [TM19] D Toscano and F Mur...

    2019 arXiv

  17. [1323]

    Interior construction state recognition with 4D BIM registered image sequences

    doi: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . buildenv . 2016 . 05 . 034. url: https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132316301925. [KKK18] Christopher Kropp, Christian Koch, and Markus König. “Interior construction state recognition with 4D BIM registered ima...

    2018

  18. [1441]

    Mapping and Localization Module in a Mobile Robot for Insu- lating Building Crawl Spaces

    issn: 1751-8695. doi: 10.1049/gtd2.12778. (Visited on 06/19/2025). [CDC19] CDC. cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/index.html. [Accessed 20-04-2020]. 2019. [Ceb+18] Sergio Cebollada et al. “Mapping and Localization Module in a Mobile Robot for Insu- lating Buil...

    2025 doi

  19. [1590]

    Visual Appearance Analysis of Forest Scenes for Monocular SLAM

    doi: 10.1021/es8016655. 118 [GW19] James Garforth and Barbara Webb. “Visual Appearance Analysis of Forest Scenes for Monocular SLAM”. en. In:2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Vol. 8690. Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 1794–1800.doi: 10....

    2020

  20. [1699]

    Extracting Rare Failure Events in Composite System Reliability Eval- uation Via Subset Simulation

    doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108848. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0168169924002394 (visited on 12/12/2024). [Hua+15] Bowen Hua et al. “Extracting Rare Failure Events in Composite System Reliability Eval- uation Via Subset Simulation”. In: IEEE Transac...

    2024

  21. [1702]

    Docking for an autonomous ocean sampling network

    doi: 10.3390/machines11040467. url: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/11/ 4/467. [Sin+01] Hanumant Singh et al. “Docking for an autonomous ocean sampling network”. In:IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering26.4 (2001), pp. 498–514. [Sin+08] Amarjeet Singh et al. “Mobile robot sensing...

    2001 doi

  22. [1731]

    A unified framework for vehicle rerouting and traffic light control to reduce traffic congestion

    issn: 1949-3061. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2257890. (Visited on 06/24/2025). [Cal23] Justine Calma. Google is helping pilots route flights to create fewer contrails, which is better for the climate - The Verge. 2023. url: https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/ 9/23825771/google- america...

    2016

  23. [1801]

    RobustForecastingAidedPowerSystemStateEstimationConsidering StateCorrelations

    issn: 1949-3061. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2552169. (Visited on 12/07/2024). [Zha+18] JunboZhaoetal.“RobustForecastingAidedPowerSystemStateEstimationConsidering StateCorrelations”.In: IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid9.4(July2018),pp.2658–2666. issn: 1949-3061. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2016...

    2019

  24. [2017]

    Electric vehicle scheduling and optimal charging prob- lem: complexity, exact and heuristic approaches

    isbn: 978-0-262-03577-4. [SO17] Ons Sassi and Ammar Oulamara. “Electric vehicle scheduling and optimal charging prob- lem: complexity, exact and heuristic approaches”. In:International Journal of Production Research 55.2 (2017), pp. 519–535. [Soh+24] Behrouz Sohrabi et al. “A ...

    2017

  25. [2021]

    Summary for Policymakers

    url: https://international-aluminium.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ wa%5C%5Ffactsheet%5C%5Ffinal.pdf. [Int23a] “Summary for Policymakers”. In: Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernm...

    2019

  26. [2024]

    Voltage Ride-Through Capability VerificationofWindTurbinesWithFully-RatedConvertersUsingReachabilityAnalysis

    doi: 10.59117/20.500.11822/45095. [VA14] Hugo N. Villegas Pico and Dionysios C. Aliprantis. “Voltage Ride-Through Capability VerificationofWindTurbinesWithFully-RatedConvertersUsingReachabilityAnalysis”. In: IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion29.2 (June 2014), pp. 392–405.i...

    doi

  27. [2050]

    Sea surface pCO2 and O2 dynamics in the partially ice-covered Arctic Ocean

    — vox.com. https://www.vox.com/a/weather- climate- change- us- cities- global-warming. [Accessed 16-02-2025]. 2019. [Isl+17] Fakhrul Islam et al. “Sea surface pCO2 and O2 dynamics in the partially ice-covered Arctic Ocean”. In:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans122.2 (2017...

    2017

  28. [2307]

    Sustainable Maritime Transport: A Review of Intelligent Ship- ping Technology and Green Port Construction Applications

    issn: 1941-0468. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2023.3249564. (Visited on 09/21/2024). [Xia+24] Guangnian Xiao et al. “Sustainable Maritime Transport: A Review of Intelligent Ship- ping Technology and Green Port Construction Applications”. In:Journal of Marine Sci- ence and Engineering12.10...

    2024

  29. [2619]

    Geothermal Resource and Reserve Assessment Methodology: Overview, Analysis and Future Directions

    doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114403. (Visited on 05/26/2025). [CZZ20] Anthony E. Ciriaco, Sadiq J. Zarrouk, and Golbon Zakeri. “Geothermal Resource and Reserve Assessment Methodology: Overview, Analysis and Future Directions”. In:Re- newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews119 (...

    2022

  30. [3270]

    Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.041 . url: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327016302230. 130 [Lee+20] Joonho Lee et al. “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain”. In:Science Robotics 5.47 (2020), eabc5986. doi: 10.1126/scir...

    2020

  31. [3876]

    Optimum Microgrid Design for Enhancing Reliability and Supply-Security

    issn: 1558-2523. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2638961. (Visited on 09/20/2024). [AME13] Seyed Ali Arefifar, Yasser A.-R. I. Mohamed, and Tarek H. M. EL-Fouly. “Optimum Microgrid Design for Enhancing Reliability and Supply-Security”. In:IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 4.3 (Sept. 2013)...

    2024

  32. [6222]

    Lifecycle Modeling and Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Drones) CO2e Emissions

    doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewp042. (Visited on 06/11/2025). [Fig17] Miguel A. Figliozzi. “Lifecycle Modeling and Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Drones) CO2e Emissions”. In:Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environ- ment 57 (Dec. 2017), pp. 251–261.issn: 1361-9209. ...

    2021

  33. [6581]

    7 - Reservoir Modeling and Simulation for Geothermal Resource Characterization and Evaluation

    doi: 10.3390/robotics10020053. (Visited on 07/12/2025). [OO25] Michael J. O’Sullivan and John P. O’Sullivan. “7 - Reservoir Modeling and Simulation for Geothermal Resource Characterization and Evaluation”. In:Geothermal Power Gen- eration (Second Edition). Ed. by Ronald DiPipp...

    2018 doi

  34. [6947]

    Deep learning-based structural health monitoring

    doi: 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561970. [Cha+24] Young-Jin Cha et al. “Deep learning-based structural health monitoring”. In:Automation in Construction 161 (2024), p. 105328. [Che+] Guanbo Chen et al. “EASEEbot: A Robotic Envelope Assessment for Energy Efficiency”. In: (). [Che+1...

    2024

  35. [8018]

    The world during WOCE

    doi: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . oceaneng . 2020 . 107381. url: https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002980182030411X. [Dic+01] Bob Dickson et al. “The world during WOCE”. In: International Geophysics. Vol. 77. Elsevier, 2001, pp. 557–583. [Dij+21] ...

    2020

  36. [8220]

    Development of a UAV-Borne Pulsed ICE-Penetrating Radar System

    doi: 10.3390/s23063136. url: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/6/3136 (visited on 12/09/2024). [Tei+22] Thomas O. Teisberg et al. “Development of a UAV-Borne Pulsed ICE-Penetrating Radar System”. In:IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium....

    2020

  37. [9663]

    An overview of drone applications in the construction industry

    issn: 2405-8963.doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2613. (Visited on 10/24/2024). [Cho+23] Hee-Wook Choi et al. “An overview of drone applications in the construction industry”. In: Drones 7.8 (2023), p. 515. [Cho+85] WW Chow et al. “The ring laser gyro”. In:Reviews of Modern Physi...

    2023 arXiv

  38. [9717]

    Framing responsive architecture with soft robots–the exploratory practice of soft pneumatic robotic architectural system

    doi: 10.3390/pr12091833. url: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/12/9/1833. 158 [Wan23] Si-Yuan Rylan Wang. “Framing responsive architecture with soft robots–the exploratory practice of soft pneumatic robotic architectural system”. In:Architectural Intelligence2.1 (2023), p. 17. [...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.