Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 189 references

JWST Observations of SN 2023ixf II: The Panchromatic Evolution Between 250 and 720 Days After the Explosion

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that SN 2023ixf develops an infrared excess by 253 days after explosion, with 10- and 18-micron bumps that trace multiple warm dust components.

desk verdict A landmark JWST nebular dataset for SN 2023ixf; the line inventory and time coverage are the value, while the 18 um dust bump rests on a single photometric point and needs a robustness check. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19727 v1 pith:PY3UVID4 submitted 2025-07-26 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

K. Medler , C. Ashall , P. Hoeflich , E. Baron , J. M. DerKacy , M. Shahbandeh , T. Mera , C. M. Pfeffer
show 55 more authors
W. B. Hoogendam D. O. Jones S. Shiber E. Fereidouni O. D. Fox J. Jencson L. Galbany J. T. Hinkle M. A. Tucker B. J. Shappee M. E. Huber K. Auchettl C. R. Angus D. D. Desai A. Do A. V. Payne J. Shi M. Y. Kong S. Romagnoli A. Syncatto G. Clayton M. Dulude M. Engesser A. V. Filippenko S. Gomez E. Y. Hsiao T. de Jaeger J. Johansson K. Krisciunas S. Kumar J. Lu M. Matsuura P. A. Mazzali D. Milisavljevic N. Morrell R. O'Steen S. Park M. M. Phillips A. P. Ravi A. Rest J. Rho N. B. Suntzeff A. Sarangi N. Smith M. D. Stritzinger L. Strolger T. Szalai T. Temim S. Tinyanont S. D. Van Dyk L. Wang Q. Wang R. Wesson Y. Yang S. Zsiros
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords core-collapsesupernovaeTypeIISN2023ixfdustformationmid-infraredastronomyJWSTspectroscopyspectralenergydistributionnebularphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SN 2023ixf, a hydrogen-rich core-collapse supernova at about 6.9 Mpc, was followed with JWST and ground-based telescopes from 252 to 720 days after explosion, producing a 0.32–30 micron spectral time series. The paper's central claim is that the infrared spectral energy distribution develops an excess by day 252.67 that peaks near 10 microns, and a second bump near 18 microns by day 719.96. The authors interpret these as emission from multiple warm dust components, likely silicate-rich, and argue that the dust was either present in the circumstellar medium before the explosion or formed earlier than is typical for such supernovae. The dataset also tracks dense hydrogen emission from the Balmer through Humphreys series, forbidden lines of neon, argon, iron, cobalt, and nickel, and carbon monoxide bands that fade as the supernova cools. A sympathetic reading would take this as the most complete mid-infrared view yet of a Type II supernova's transition into the dust-dominated phase.

What carries the argument

The central object is the evolving panchromatic spectral energy distribution from 0.32 to 30 $\mu$m, assembled from JWST NIRSpec and MIRI/LRS spectra, MIRI imaging, and ground-based optical and near-infrared spectra. The SED carries the argument because its continuum excess is isolated by subtracting blackbody fits of 850 K, 550 K, 360 K, and 300 K at the four successive epochs, revealing the 10 and 18 $\mu$m bumps that the paper reads as silicate-dust features. Line-profile morphology, especially the blue-shifted and time-dependent red-side attenuation of hydrogen transitions, is the second mechanism used to argue for aspherical ejecta and possible in-situ dust.

What would settle it

Re-reduce the +719.96 d MIRI LRS spectrum with an independent background-subtraction method and check whether the 18 $\mu$m bump survives and matches the F1800W photometry; if the bump disappears or is reproduced by a calibration residual near the LRS throughput edge, the two-component dust interpretation loses its observational support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that SN 2023ixf shows a strong, featureless infrared excess by +252.67 d, described by a 688 K blackbody, with a broad 10 micron feature appearing by +373.52 d and a second 18 micron peak by +719.96 d. These features are identified as silicate-rich dust emission, and their early emergence and two-bump structure point to multiple warm dust components rather than a single dust shell. Supporting evidence includes the persistence of the CO fundamental band while the first overtone fades, multi-peaked and blueshifted hydrogen lines, and a strong [Ne ii] 12.813 $\mu$m line that the paper links to a relatively massive progenitor.

Load-bearing premise

The 10 and 18 $\mu$m bumps are genuine emission from dust rather than artifacts of the MIRI calibration or of the way the bright continuum was subtracted; the derived dust radius also assumes an optically thick spherical shell, which the paper itself treats as a lower limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dust emission in a hydrogen-rich supernova can appear before 250 days, much earlier than the several-hundred-day delays seen in earlier Spitzer-era SNe II.
  • The 10 and 18 $\mu$m features indicate silicate-rich dust, making SN 2023ixf a nearby laboratory for studying the composition and survival of dust around core-collapse supernovae.
  • The CO fundamental band persists to at least +720 d while the first overtone fades, tracing the cooling of molecular gas below about 1000 K.
  • The multi-peaked, blue-shifted hydrogen profiles with time-dependent red attenuation, together with symmetric [Co ii] and unshifted [Ca ii], point to an aspherical, clumpy explosion interacting with dense circumstellar material.
  • A strong [Ne ii] 12.813 $\mu$m feature, combined with a high CO fundamental-to-Br$\alpha$ ratio, tentatively favors a progenitor more massive than the 15 $M_\odot$ often proposed for SN 2004et.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 18 $\mu$m bump is confirmed by an independent reduction, SN 2023ixf would become one of the clearest cases of evolving multi-component dust in a hydrogen-rich supernova, and would motivate revisiting the usual assumption that such dust appears only after several hundred days.
  • The observed lack of wavelength-dependent red-side attenuation across H$\alpha$, Pa$\alpha$, and Br$\alpha$ could be tested with dust models that include scattering and a range of grain sizes; the paper leaves this open, and a positive result would separate line-formation geometry from dust blocking.
  • Applying the same blackbody-subtraction and line-identification procedure to other nearby Type II supernovae with JWST data would show whether the early 10 $\mu$m excess is common or peculiar to SN 2023ixf's dusty progenitor.
  • The tentative progenitor-mass inference from [Ne ii] could be strengthened by nebular modeling of the CO fundamental-to-Br$\alpha$ ratio, which the authors explicitly defer to later papers in the series.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. SN 2023ixf, a nearby Type II supernova, was observed with JWST NIRSpec, MIRI/LRS, and MIRI imaging at roughly +253, +374, +600, and +720 days after explosion, supplemented by ground-based optical and NIR spectra. The paper catalogues the panchromatic spectral evolution, identifies a wide range of H, He, C, O, Ne, Ar, Ca, Fe, Co, Ni, and CO features, and measures velocity shifts and profile changes in the nebular phase. The SED shows an infrared excess peaking near 10 µm that is present by +252.67 d and grows relative to the fading SN flux; the authors report the development of a secondary 18 µm bump by +719.96 d and interpret the two features as possible evidence for multiple warm dust components (pre-existing CSM/CDS dust plus newly formed ejecta dust), with detailed dust and molecular modeling deferred to later papers in the series.

Significance. If the data and interpretations hold, this is one of the most complete late-time panchromatic datasets for a Type II SN, and the early emergence of an IR excess with possible 10 and 18 µm silicate features would be an important constraint on dust formation and on the dusty CSM of SN 2023ixf. The paper's strengths are the detailed observation log, the standard reductions, the comparison with Spitzer-era SNe II, and the explicit deferral of detailed modeling to future work. The main load-bearing weakness is the 18 µm bump, which rests on a single photometric measurement at one epoch; this needs to be demonstrated robustly or the claim should be softened.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4 and Table 2] The claim of a secondary 18.0 µm dust component rests on a single F1800W photometric measurement at +719.96 d: the flux jumps from 3.076 ± 0.005 mJy at +600.21 d to 5.222 ± 0.002 mJy, while F1500W declines from 2.983 to 2.834 mJy and F2100W remains flat (2.822 to 2.798 mJy). Because MIRI/LRS only covers 5–14 µm, there is no spectroscopic confirmation of an 18 µm feature, and the quoted dither-to-dither errors do not include calibration or PSF-fitting systematics. Please provide additional checks (e.g., independent reductions, aperture/PSF comparisons, background and neighbor contamination, calibration stability at F1800W) or explicitly soften the claim to a tentative excess pending confirmation.
  2. [Sec. 3.1 / Table 2] The photometric uncertainties in Table 2 are derived only from the standard deviation across dithers, which measures random repeatability rather than absolute calibration accuracy. For a single-epoch, single-filter excess such as the F1800W measurement at +719.96 d, the MIRI absolute calibration uncertainty (typically a few percent, i.e., a few tenths of a mJy at these flux levels) is larger than the quoted 0.002–0.005 mJy random errors and must be propagated into the significance of the 18 µm bump. Without this, the reported >2 mJy excess cannot be distinguished from a calibration or systematic offset.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical typo: 'could arises' should be 'could arise'.
  2. [Sec. 3.2.2] The MIRI readout pattern is written as 'FASTR1'; this appears to be a typo for 'FAST' (or the official pattern name), and should be corrected.
  3. [Table 3] The Hδ wavelength is listed as '0.410.2 µm'; the decimal point appears misplaced and should be '0.4102 µm'.
  4. [Sec. 7.2 and Conclusions] The term 'Pashen-α' should be 'Paschen-α' in Section 7.2 and in the conclusions bullet list.
  5. [Sec. 8.1] There is a typo: 'infared continuum' should be 'infrared continuum' in the paragraph discussing the 688 K blackbody.
  6. [Table A1] In the last row of Table A1, the MIRI 'Tobs (MJD)' entry for Visit 5 is listed as '714.08', which mixes a phase value into an MJD column; this should be corrected to the actual MJD.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper's central claims are direct observational measurements, with dust modeling explicitly deferred.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are observational: line identifications, spectral feature tracking, and the emergence of an infrared excess are read directly from the reduced JWST and ground-based data. Line identifications rely on external atomic data and prior published SN spectra; no fitted parameter is used to define the discovery. The continuum fits (e.g., blackbody temperatures of 850 K, 550 K, 360 K, and 300 K used for continuum subtraction in Section 6, and the 688 K fit in Section 8.1) are descriptive tools for comparison and for deriving a dust radius lower limit, not predictive claims derived from the fitted values. The dust interpretation is explicitly tentative: Section 8 states that determining precise dust properties requires detailed modeling reserved for future papers, and the conclusions call the dust location 'left for a more detailed analysis.' Self-citations, such as Paper I (DerKacy et al. 2025) for the absence of molecules at +33.6 d and the program proposals for data provenance, document the observational basis rather than supplying an unverified premise. The 18 um bump rests on a single F1800W photometric point, which is a legitimate data-quality concern, but it is not an example of a parameter being fitted and then renamed a prediction. No equation or derivation step reduces to its own inputs, and no load-bearing argument relies on an unverified self-citation. The paper is self-contained as a presentation of measurements, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims rest on adopted distance, explosion epoch, and extinction from the literature; on standard atomic line lists and the assumption of an optically thin nebular phase; and on simple blackbody and optically thick dust-shell assumptions for the continuum and radius estimates. The fitted blackbody temperatures are descriptive and not used to generate a new physical prediction.

free parameters (6)
  • Continuum blackbody temperature at +252.67 d = 850 K
    Fit to the IR continuum in Sec. 6 and Fig. 4 to subtract before spectral comparison; the authors state a single blackbody is not physically representative.
  • Continuum blackbody temperature at +373.52 d = 550 K
    Same continuum subtraction procedure for the second JWST epoch.
  • Continuum blackbody temperature at +600.21 d = 360 K
    Same procedure; at later times a single blackbody does not capture the optically thin dust continuum.
  • Continuum blackbody temperature at +719.96 d = 300 K
    Same procedure for the last epoch.
  • Warm dust temperature from IR continuum at +252.67 d = 688 K
    Used in Sec. 8.1 with an assumed optically thick, spherical geometry to estimate r_dust = 2.2e16 cm; not a modeled quantity.
  • Gaussian line profile parameters for [NiII], [ArII], [CoII], and [NeII] = FWHM and Vpeak values in Fig. 9
    Used to quantify velocity evolution, but not central to the main observational claims.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Adopted distance of 6.9 +/- 0.1 Mpc, explosion epoch MJD 60082.75, and foreground/host extinctions from prior literature (Table 1).
    All phases, luminosities, and velocity scales depend on these values; they are not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Identified emission lines are assumed to arise from the SN ejecta at their rest-frame wavelengths, using standard atomic line lists.
    Line identification in Sec. 5 relies on this; no radiative-transfer modeling is performed, and several features are blends or tentative.
  • domain assumption The ejecta is in the optically thin nebular phase, so line fluxes trace mass and the continuum can be approximated by a blackbody or dust component.
    Used throughout Secs. 4, 6, and 8 to subtract continua and interpret line profiles.
  • ad hoc to paper Optically thick, spherical dust shell assumed for the r_dust = 2.2e16 cm estimate at +252.67 d.
    Sec. 8.1; authors note the CSM is likely clumpy and call the radius a strict lower limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST Observations of SN 2023ixf II: The Panchromatic Evolution Between 250 and 720 Days After the Explosion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PY3UVID4

@misc{pith2026250719727,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST Observations of SN 2023ixf II: The Panchromatic Evolution Between 250 and 720 Days After the Explosion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PY3UVID4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19727}
}
abstract

We present the nebular phase spectroscopic and photometric observations of the nearby hydrogen-rich core-collapse supernova (CC-SN) 2023ixf, obtained through our JWST programs. These observations, combined with ground-based optical and near-infrared spectra, cover +252.67 - 719.96 d, creating a comprehensive, panchromatic time-series dataset spanning 0.32 - 30$\mu$m. In this second paper of the series, we focus on identifying key spectral emission features and tracking their evolution through the nebular phase. The JWST data reveal hydrogen emission from the Balmer to Humphreys series, as well as prominent forbidden lines from Ne, Ar, Fe, Co, and Ni. NIRSpec observations display strong emission from the first overtone and fundamental bands of carbon monoxide, which weaken with time as the ejecta cools and dust emission dominates. The spectral energy distribution shows a clear infrared excess emerging by +252.67 d peaking around 10.0$\mu$m, with a secondary bump at 18.0$\mu$m developing by +719.96 d. We suggest that this evolution could arises from multiple warm dust components. In upcoming papers in this series, we will present detailed modeling of the molecular and dust properties. Overall, this dataset significantly advances our understanding of the mid-infrared properties of CC-SNe, providing an unprecedented view of their late-time line, molecule, and dust emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19727 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A stacked three-color image of the host-galaxy spiral arm using the F770W, F1000W, and F1500W MIRI filters from epoch 301.72 d. The location of SN 2023ixf is highlighted by the light blue circle. work are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The evolution of the SED covering 0.32 − 14.0 µm of SN 2023ixf from +252.67 d to +719.96 d post explosion. Photometry is shown by the colored symbols, at +301.72 d, +600.21 d, and +719.96 d. The data have been corrected for extinction and are presented in the rest frame. The SED’s are dominated by a large number of emission lines that decline in strength as SN 2023ixf evolves. CO molecule and dust features are highl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lines identified within the ground based optical and NIR (top row), JWST NIRSpec G235M/F170LP (second row), G395/F290LP (third row) and MIRI (fourth row) spectra of SN 2023ixf at ∼ 250 d (blue), ∼ 373 d (green), ∼ 600 d (red), and ∼ 720 d (purple) post explosion. The spectra have been vertically shifted for clarity. The CO 1st overtone, and CO fundamental band are shown by the shaded blue regions. The full list of i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral comparison of SN 2023ixf with several SNe II observed at infrared wavelengths. All spectra have been corrected for redshift and extinction. To aid in comparison, the spectra of SN 2023ixf are continuum subtracted with blackbody functions of 850 K, 550 K, 360 K…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the α (top), β (middle), and γ (bottom) transitions of the different hydrogen series located between 0.32 − 14.0 µm at +252.67 (blue), +373.52 (green), +600.21 (red), and 719.96 d (purple). Several of the isolated hydrogen emission lines, especially the α …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of the Hα profile from a blueshifted P-Cygni like feature at +72 d to an asymmetric multi– peak feature at +761.97 d, with high velocity components that emerge around +258.30 d. Earlier spectra are pre￾sented in (Paper I). All spectra have been corrected for …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The evolution of the Hα, Paα, and Brα emission features. All features have been continuum-subtracted and normalized to the flux at 0 km s−1 . No wavelength-dependent attenuation of the redshifted flux is observed at a given epoch, although a temporal-dependent attenuat…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spectral evolution of the [O i] 0.6300, 0.6363 µm doublet and [Ca ii] 0.7292 0.7324 µm. The features are plot￾ted in velocity space relative to the rest-frame wavelengths of the [O i] 0.6300 µm and [Ca ii] 0.7292 µm lines, respec￾tively. The [O i] 0.6300, 0.6363 µm fea…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Velocity evolution of the [Ni ii] 6.636 µm, [Ar ii] 6.985 µm, [Co ii] 10.521 µm, and [Ne ii] 12.813 µm. While the neon, argon, and cobalt lines are centered around 0 km s−1 , the nickel emission feature is blueshifted by ∼ 1, 000 ± 500 km s−1 at all epochs. All emissio…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

189 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc681

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc681 2025

  2. [2]

    2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Aldering, G., Adam, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries, ed. J. A. Tyson & S. Wolff, 61–72, doi: 10.1117/12.458107 23 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Rest wavelength [ m] 30.0 27.5 25.0 22.5 20.0 17.5 15.0 12.5 Log10(Flux ) + cons...

    doi:10.1117/12.458107 2002

  3. [3]

    M., & S´ anchez, F

    Alvarez, P., Rodr ´ ıguez Espinosa, J. M., & S´ anchez, F. 1998, NewAR, 42, 553, doi: 10.1016/S1387-6473(98)00071-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s1387-6473(98)00071-2 1998

  4. [4]

    P., Dessart, L., Gutierrez, C

    Anderson, J. P., Dessart, L., Gutierrez, C. P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 671, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu610

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu610 2014

  5. [5]

    E., Sugerman, B

    Andrews, J. E., Sugerman, B. E. K., Clayton, G. C., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 731, 47, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/47

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/47

  6. [6]

    E., Clayton, G

    Andrews, J. E., Clayton, G. C., Wesson, R., et al. 2011b, AJ, 142, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/45

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/45

  7. [7]

    E., Sand, D

    Andrews, J. E., Sand, D. J., Valenti, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab43e3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab43e3 2019

  8. [8]

    D., Bahcall, J

    Arnett, W. D., Bahcall, J. N., Kirshner, R. P., & Woosley, S. E. 1989, ARA&A, 27, 629, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.003213

    arXiv 1989

Show all 189 references
  1. [9]

    2024a, ApJ, 975, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6608

    Ashall, C., Hoeflich, P., Baron, E., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 975, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6608

    doi

  2. [10]

    A., Shahbandeh, M., et al

    Ashall, C., Hoeflich, P. A., Shahbandeh, M., et al. 2024b, Building the Legacy of Supernova 2023ixf: How Does Molecule Formation Lead to Dust?, JWST Proposal. Cycle 3, ID. #5290 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051...

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    2025, ApJ, submitted

    Baron, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, submitted

    2025

  4. [12]

    K., Margutti, R., et al

    Berger, E., Keating, G. K., Margutti, R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace0c4

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Orellana, M., Folatelli, G., et al

    Bersten, M. C., Orellana, M., Folatelli, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348183

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 4659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2094

    Bevan, A. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2094

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Bevan, A., & Barlow, M. J. 2016a, MNRAS, 456, 1269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2651 —. 2016b, MNRAS, 456, 1269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2651

    doi

  8. [16]

    J., et al

    Bevan, A., Wesson, R., Barlow, M. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 5192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz679

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    2014, A&A, 564, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322932

    Biscaro, C., & Cherchneff, I. 2014, A&A, 564, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322932

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    F., & Evans, A

    Bode, M. F., & Evans, A. 1980, MNRAS, 193, 21P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/193.1.21P B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    1980 doi

  11. [19]

    2019, ApJL, 873, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0558

    Bose, S., Dong, S., Elias-Rosa, N., et al. 2019, ApJL, 873, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0558

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    A., Pearson, J., Shrestha, M., et al

    Bostroem, K. A., Pearson, J., Shrestha, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 956, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf9a4

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    2020, ApJ, 901, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafa2

    Burrow, A., Baron, E., Ashall, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafa2

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    2022, JWST Calibration Pipeline, Tech

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2022, JWST Calibration Pipeline, Tech. rep., doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7038885

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Cardiel, N., Pascual, S., Gallego, J., et al. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 523, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. J. Teuben, M. W. Pound, B. A. Thomas, & E. M. Warner, 317

    2019

  16. [24]

    1987, IAUC, 4457, 1

    Catchpole, R., Glass, I., Karovska, M., et al. 1987, IAUC, 4457, 1

    1987

  17. [25]

    Nayana, A. J. 2024, ApJL, 963, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad275d

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    A., & Fransson, C

    Chevalier, R. A., & Fransson, C. 1987, Nature, 328, 44, doi: 10.1038/328044a0

    1987 doi

  19. [27]

    E., & Tielens, A

    Chiar, J. E., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2006, ApJ, 637, 774, doi: 10.1086/498406

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    D., Deneault, E

    Clayton, D. D., Deneault, E. A. N., & Meyer, B. S. 2001, ApJ, 562, 480, doi: 10.1086/323467

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    C., Wesson, R., Fox, O

    Clayton, G. C., Wesson, R., Fox, O. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01574

    2025 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    C., Vacca, W

    Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362, doi: 10.1086/382907

    2004 doi

  23. [31]

    Y., Ashall, C., et al

    Davis, S., Hsiao, E. Y., Ashall, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c40

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    2025, ApJ, submitted

    DerKacy, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, submitted

    2025

  25. [33]

    Dessart, L., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, A&A, 437, 667, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042525

    2005 doi

  26. [34]

    2016, ApJ, 818, 26, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/26

    Dragulin, P., & Hoeflich, P. 2016, ApJ, 818, 26, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/26

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    1983, ApJ, 274, 175, doi: 10.1086/161435

    Dwek, E. 1983, ApJ, 274, 175, doi: 10.1086/161435

    1983 doi

  28. [36]

    2006, Science, 313, 178, doi: 10.1126/science.1130423

    Dwek, E. 2006, Science, 313, 178, doi: 10.1126/science.1130423

    2006 doi

  29. [37]

    Dwek, E., Galliano, F., & Jones, A. P. 2007, ApJ, 662, 927, doi: 10.1086/518430

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    Dwek, E., & Scalo, J. M. 1980, ApJ, 239, 193, doi: 10.1086/158100

    1980 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Ackley, K., Jim´ enez-Ibarra, F., et al

    Dyer, M. J., Ackley, K., Jim´ enez-Ibarra, F., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13094, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X, ed. H. K. Marshall, J. Spyromilio, & T. Usuda, 130941X, doi: 10.1117/12.3018305

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Chugai, N., et al

    Elmhamdi, A., Danziger, I. J., Chugai, N., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 939, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06150.x 28

    2003

  33. [42]

    A., Schneider, D

    Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Schneider, D. P., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649, doi: 10.1086/368246

    2003 doi

  34. [43]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 111, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02120-8

    Fang, Q., Maeda, K., Kuncarayakti, H., & Nagao, T. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 111, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02120-8

    2024 doi

  35. [44]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4f60

    Fang, Q., Maeda, K., Kuncarayakti, H., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4f60

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    2020, A&A, 633, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936748

    Fedriani, R., Caratti o Garatti, A., Koutoulaki, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936748

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    Andrews, J. E. 2024, A&A, 687, L20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450440

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    S., & Gail, H

    Ferrarotti, A. S., & Gail, H. P. 2006, A&A, 447, 553, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041198

    2006 doi

  39. [48]

    A., Beacom, J

    Flinner, N., Tucker, M. A., Beacom, J. F., & Shappee, B. J. 2023, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 174, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/acefc4

    2023 doi

  40. [49]

    2025, A&A, 698, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554128

    Maeda, K. 2025, A&A, 698, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554128

    2025 doi

  41. [50]

    D., et al

    Fox, O., Szalai, T., Van Dyk, S. D., et al. 2024, Building A Modern Sample of Dusty Supernovae with JWST, JWST Proposal. Cycle 2, ID. #3921

    2024

  42. [51]

    Gall, C., Hjorth, J., & Andersen, A. C. 2011, A&A Rv, 19, 43, doi: 10.1007/s00159-011-0043-7

    2011 doi

  43. [52]

    2014, Nature, 511, 326, doi: 10.1038/nature13558 Garz´ on, F., Balcells, M., Gallego, J., et al

    Gall, C., Hjorth, J., Watson, D., et al. 2014, Nature, 511, 326, doi: 10.1038/nature13558 Garz´ on, F., Balcells, M., Gallego, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244729

    2014 doi

  44. [53]

    L., Fesen, R

    Gerardy, C. L., Fesen, R. A., H¨ oflich, P., & Wheeler, J. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 2968, doi: 10.1086/301390

    2000 doi

  45. [54]

    2023, karllark/dust extinction: OneRelationForAllWaves, v1.2, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799360

    Gordon, K. 2023, karllark/dust extinction: OneRelationForAllWaves, v1.2, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799360

    2023 doi

  46. [55]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    A., & Margutti, R

    Harrison, F. A., & Margutti, R. 2023, ApJL, 952, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdf4e

    2023 doi

  48. [57]

    J., Bloemen, S., Vreeswijk, P

    Groot, P. J., Bloemen, S., Vreeswijk, P. M., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12182, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, ed. H. K. Marshall, J. Spyromilio, & T. Usuda, 121821V, doi: 10.1117/12.2630160

    2022 doi

  49. [58]

    2023, ApJL, 955, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf573

    Guetta, D., Langella, A., Gagliardini, S., & Della Valle, M. 2023, ApJL, 955, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf573

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    Hanuschik, R. W. 1988, PASA, 7, 446, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000022621

    1988 doi

  51. [60]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  52. [61]

    2023, ApJL, 955, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf299

    Hiramatsu, D., Tsuna, D., Berger, E., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf299

    2023 doi

  53. [62]

    1988, PASA, 7, 434, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000022608

    Hoeflich, P. 1988, PASA, 7, 434, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000022608

    1988 doi

  54. [63]

    B., Jones, D

    Hoogendam, W. B., Jones, D. O., Ashall, C., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.17556, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17556

    doi arXiv

  55. [64]

    B., Ashall, C., Jones, D

    Hoogendam, W. B., Ashall, C., Jones, D. O., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.04610, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.04610

    doi arXiv

  56. [65]

    2023, ApJL, 953, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace4c4

    Hosseinzadeh, G., Farah, J., Shrestha, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 953, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace4c4

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    C., Flewelling, H., et al

    Huber, M., Chambers, K. C., Flewelling, H., et al. 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7153, 1

    2015

  58. [67]

    H., Dunlop, J

    Hughes, D. H., Dunlop, J. S., & Rawlings, S. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/289.4.766

    1997 doi

  59. [68]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  60. [69]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 3360, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty863

    Pomohaci, R. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3360, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty863

    2018 doi

  61. [70]

    2011, MNRAS, 417, 261, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19128.x

    Inserra, C., Turatto, M., Pastorello, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 261, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19128.x

    2011

  62. [71]

    2023, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2023-1158, 1

    Itagaki, K. 2023, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2023-1158, 1

    2023

  63. [72]

    2025, ApJ, 978, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a62 Jacobson-Gal´ an, W

    Iwata, Y., Akimoto, M., Matsuoka, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a62 Jacobson-Gal´ an, W. V., Dessart, L., Margutti, R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf2ec

    2025 doi

  64. [73]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  65. [74]

    2012, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62, 407, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901

    Janka, H.-T. 2012, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62, 407, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901

    2012 doi

  66. [75]

    2016, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 66, 341, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044747

    Janka, H.-T., Melson, T., & Summa, A. 2016, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 66, 341, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044747

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    E., Pearson, J., Beasor, E

    Jencson, J. E., Pearson, J., Beasor, E. R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace618

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    2012, A&A, 546, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219528

    Jerkstrand, A., Fransson, C., Maguire, K., et al. 2012, A&A, 546, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219528

    2012 doi

  69. [78]

    2015, PASP, 127, 623, doi: 10.1086/682255 29

    Kendrew, S., Scheithauer, S., Bouchet, P., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 623, doi: 10.1086/682255 29

    2015 doi

  70. [79]

    2001, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol

    Khokhlov, A., & H¨ oflich, P. 2001, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 556, Explosive Phenomena in Astrophysical Compact Objects, ed. H.-Y

    2001

  71. [80]

    Chang, C.-H. Lee, M. Rho, & I. Yi (AIP), 301–312, doi: 10.1063/1.1368287

    doi

  72. [81]

    D., Foley, R

    Kilpatrick, C. D., Foley, R. J., Jacobson-Gal´ an, W. V., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace4ca

    2023 doi

  73. [82]

    2005, ApJL, 628, L123, doi: 10.1086/432719

    Mattila, S. 2005, ApJL, 628, L123, doi: 10.1086/432719

    2005 doi

  74. [83]

    2006, ApJL, 651, L117, doi: 10.1086/509655

    Kotak, R., Meikle, P., Pozzo, M., et al. 2006, ApJL, 651, L117, doi: 10.1086/509655

    2006 doi

  75. [84]

    Kotak, R., Meikle, W. P. S., Farrah, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 306, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/306

    2009 doi

  76. [85]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf312

    Sun, N.-C. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf312

    2025 doi

  77. [86]

    2020, ApJ, 902, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb4e7

    Kuncarayakti, H., Folatelli, G., Maeda, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb4e7

    2020 doi

  78. [87]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Lantz, B., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5249, Optical Design and Engineering, ed. L. Mazuray, P. J. Rogers, & R. Wartmann, 146–155, doi: 10.1117/12.512493

    2004 doi

  79. [88]

    2025, JWST Pipeline

    Law, D., Diaz, R., Sosey, M., et al. 2025, JWST Pipeline

    2025

  80. [89]

    rep., doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15571377

    Notebooks, Tech. rep., doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15571377

    doi

  81. [90]

    C., Filippenko, A

    Leonard, D. C., Filippenko, A. V., Gates, E. L., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 35, doi: 10.1086/324785

    2002 doi

  82. [91]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03856, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03856

    Li, G., Wang, X., Yang, Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03856, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03856

    2025 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    1992, ApJ, 387, 309, doi: 10.1086/171082

    Li, H., & McCray, R. 1992, ApJ, 387, 309, doi: 10.1086/171082

    1992 doi

  84. [93]

    2020, A&A, 642, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038116

    Liljegren, S., Jerkstrand, A., & Grumer, J. 2020, A&A, 642, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038116

    2020 doi

  85. [94]

    2023, ApJL, 958, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0da8

    Liu, C., Chen, X., Er, X., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0da8

    2023 doi

  86. [95]

    1994, ApJ, 428, 769, doi: 10.1086/174285 —

    Liu, W., & Dalgarno, A. 1994, ApJ, 428, 769, doi: 10.1086/174285 —. 1995, ApJ, 454, 472, doi: 10.1086/176498

    1994 doi

  87. [96]

    1992, ApJ, 396, 679, doi: 10.1086/171749

    Liu, W., Dalgarno, A., & Lepp, S. 1992, ApJ, 396, 679, doi: 10.1086/171749

    1992 doi

  88. [97]

    B., Danziger, I

    Lucy, L. B., Danziger, I. J., Gouiffes, C., & Bouchet, P. 1989a, in IAU Colloq. 120: Structure and Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium, ed. G. Tenorio-Tagle, M. Moles, & J. Melnick, Vol. 350, 164, doi: 10.1007/BFb0114861 —. 1989b, in IAU Colloq. 120: Structure and Dynamics of ...

    doi

  89. [98]

    A., et al

    Maeda, K., Kawabata, K., Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2008, Science, 319, 1220, doi: 10.1126/science.1149437

    2008 doi

  90. [99]

    J., et al

    Maguire, K., Di Carlo, E., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 981, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16332.x

    2010

  91. [100]

    2004, Nature, 431, 533, doi: 10.1038/nature02930

    Maiolino, R., Schneider, R., Oliva, E., et al. 2004, Nature, 431, 533, doi: 10.1038/nature02930

    2004 doi

  92. [101]

    M., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Margutti, R., Soderberg, A. M., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/134 Mart ´ ı-Devesa, G., Cheung, C. C., Di Lalla, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A254, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349061

    2012 doi

  93. [102]

    V., Barth, A

    Matheson, T., Filippenko, A. V., Barth, A. J., et al. 2000, The Astronomical Journal, 120, 1487

    2000

  94. [103]

    Maund, J. R. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 2202, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx879

    2017 doi

  95. [104]

    K., Cohen, J

    McCarthy, J. K., Cohen, J. G., Butcher, B., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3355, Optical Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. S. D’Odorico, 81–92, doi: 10.1117/12.316831

    1998 doi

  96. [105]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18507, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18507

    Medler, K., Ashall, C., Shahbandeh, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18507, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18507

    2025 doi arXiv

  97. [106]

    Meikle, W. P. S., Mattila, S., Pastorello, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 608, doi: 10.1086/519733

    2007 doi

  98. [107]

    Meikle, W. P. S., Kotak, R., Farrah, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 109, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/109

    2011 doi

  99. [108]

    2025, ApJ, in prep

    Mera, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, in prep

    2025

  100. [109]

    D., Mazzali, P

    Michel, P. D., Mazzali, P. A., Perley, D. A., Hinds, K. R., & Wise, J. L. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 633, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf443

    2025 doi

  101. [110]

    A., Gerardy, C

    Milisavljevic, D., Fesen, R. A., Gerardy, C. L., Kirshner, R. P., & Challis, P. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1343, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/1343

    2010 doi

  102. [111]

    2008, ApJL, 687, L9, doi: 10.1086/593135 M¨ uller, B., Heger, A., Liptai, D., & Cameron, J

    Matheson, T. 2008, ApJL, 687, L9, doi: 10.1086/593135 M¨ uller, B., Heger, A., Liptai, D., & Cameron, J. B. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 742, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1083 M¨ uller Bravo, T. E. 2023, temuller/idsred: First Release!, v0.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7851772

    2008 doi

  103. [112]

    J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al

    Nayana, A. J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fb

    2025 doi

  104. [113]

    Neustadt, J. M. M., Kochanek, C. S., & Smith, M. R. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5366, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3073

    2024 doi

  105. [114]

    J., Bevan, A., et al

    Niculescu-Duvaz, M., Barlow, M. J., Bevan, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4302, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1626

    2022 doi

  106. [115]

    R., et al

    Niu, Z., Sun, N.-C., Maund, J. R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf4e3

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    B., Cohen, J

    Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., et al. 1995, PASP, 107, 375, doi: 10.1086/133562

    1995 doi

  108. [117]

    J., et al

    Panjkov, S., Auchettl, K., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e059, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.66 30

    2024 doi

  109. [118]

    H., Rho, J., Yoon, S.-C., et al

    Park, S. H., Rho, J., Yoon, S.-C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.11877, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.11877

    2025 doi

  110. [119]

    2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Pascual, S., Cardiel, N., Garz´ on, F., et al. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 521, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVI, ed. M. Molinaro, K. Shortridge, & F. Pasian, 232

    2019

  111. [120]

    Pascual, S., Gallego, J., Cardiel, N., & Eliche-Moral, M. C. 2010, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    2010

  112. [121]

    2023, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2023-1164, 1

    Perley, D., & Gal-Yam, A. 2023, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2023-1164, 1

    2023

  113. [122]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G...

    2014 doi

  114. [123]

    L., & Shara, M

    Pledger, J. L., & Shara, M. M. 2023, ApJL, 953, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace88b

    2023 doi

  115. [124]

    1992, PASP, 104, 717, doi: 10.1086/133043

    Podsiadlowski, P. 1992, PASP, 104, 717, doi: 10.1086/133043

    1992 doi

  116. [127]

    2024, MNRAS, 534, 271, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2012

    Qin, Y.-J., Zhang, K., Bloom, J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 271, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2012

    2024 doi

  117. [128]

    L., Villar, V

    Ransome, C. L., Villar, V. A., Tartaglia, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2df7

    2024 doi

  118. [129]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 023018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023018

    Ravensburg, E., Carenza, P., Eckner, C., & Goobar, A. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 023018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023018

    2024 doi

  119. [130]

    P., Rho, J., Park, S., et al

    Ravi, A. P., Rho, J., Park, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accddc

    2023 doi

  120. [131]

    T., Toomey, D

    Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W., Onaka, P. M., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 362, doi: 10.1086/367745

    2003 doi

  121. [132]

    R., et al

    Rho, J., Evans, A., Geballe, T. R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 232, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd850

    2021 doi

  122. [133]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, ApJL, 934, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    2022 doi

  123. [134]

    F., Aitken, D

    Roche, P. F., Aitken, D. K., & Smith, C. H. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 39P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/252.1.39P

    1991 doi

  124. [135]

    F., Aitken, D

    Roche, P. F., Aitken, D. K., Smith, C. H., & James, S. D. 1989, Nature, 337, 533, doi: 10.1038/337533a0

    1989 doi

  125. [136]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Rockosi, C., Stover, R., Kibrick, R., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 77350R, doi: 10.1117/12.856818

    2010 doi

  126. [137]

    K., Anupama, G

    Sahu, D. K., Anupama, G. C., Srividya, S., & Muneer, S. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1315, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10937.x

    2006

  127. [138]

    2022, A&A, 668, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244391

    Sarangi, A. 2022, A&A, 668, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244391

    2022 doi

  128. [139]

    2015, A&A, 575, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424969

    Sarangi, A., & Cherchneff, I. 2015, A&A, 575, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424969

    2015 doi

  129. [140]

    Sarangi, A., Dwek, E., & Arendt, R. G. 2018, ApJ, 859, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfc3

    2018 doi

  130. [141]

    2024, JCAP, 2024, 083, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/083

    Sarmah, P. 2024, JCAP, 2024, 083, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/083

    2024 doi

  131. [142]

    T., & M¨ uller, E

    Scheck, L., Kifonidis, K., Janka, H. T., & M¨ uller, E. 2006, A&A, 457, 963, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064855

    2006 doi

  132. [143]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  133. [144]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    Schneider, R., Ferrara, A., & Salvaterra, R. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    2004

  134. [145]

    Y., Ashall, C., et al

    Shahbandeh, M., Hsiao, E. Y., Ashall, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4030

    2022 doi

  135. [146]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 6048, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1681

    Shahbandeh, M., Sarangi, A., Temim, T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 6048, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1681

    2023 doi

  136. [147]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.14474, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.14474

    Shahbandeh, M., Ashall, C., Hoeflich, P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.14474, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.14474

    2024 doi arXiv

  137. [148]

    D., Temim, T., et al

    Shahbandeh, M., Fox, O. D., Temim, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adce77

    2025 doi

  138. [149]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48

    2014 doi

  139. [150]

    M., & Hoeflich, P

    Sharp, C. M., & Hoeflich, P. 1990, Ap&SS, 171, 213, doi: 10.1007/BF00646849

    1990 doi

  140. [151]

    S., Moriya, T

    Singh, A., Teja, R. S., Moriya, T. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7955

    2024 doi

  141. [152]

    Singh, P. D. 1975, A&A, 44, 411

    1975

  142. [153]

    Sluder, A., Milosavljevi´ c, M., & Montgomery, M. H. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5580, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2060

    2018 doi

  143. [155]

    J., & Filippenko, A

    Smith, N., Foley, R. J., & Filippenko, A. V. 2008, ApJ, 680, 568, doi: 10.1086/587860

    2008 doi

  144. [156]

    J., et al

    Smith, N., Pearson, J., Sand, D. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf366

    2023 doi

  145. [157]

    M., Filippenko, A

    Smith, N., Silverman, J. M., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/17 31

    2012 doi

  146. [158]

    P., & Rideal, E

    Snow, C. P., & Rideal, E. K. 1929, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 125, 462, doi: 10.1098/rspa.1929.0179

    1929

  147. [159]

    D., Szalai, T., Van Dyk, S

    Soraisam, M. D., Szalai, T., Van Dyk, S. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acef22

    2023 doi

  148. [160]

    1996, MNRAS, 283, L89, doi: 10.1093/mnras/283.3.L89

    Spyromilio, J., & Leibundgut, B. 1996, MNRAS, 283, L89, doi: 10.1093/mnras/283.3.L89

    1996 doi

  149. [161]

    Spyromilio, J., Meikle, W. P. S., Learner, R. C. M., & Allen, D. A. 1988, Nature, 334, 327, doi: 10.1038/334327a0

    1988 doi

  150. [162]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 173, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/173

    Stritzinger, M., Taddia, F., Fransson, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 173, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/173

    2012 doi

  151. [163]

    2023, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 145, 1

    Stritzinger, M., Valerin, G., Elias-Rosa, N., et al. 2023, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 145, 1

    2023

  152. [164]

    Szalai, T., & Van Dyk, S. V. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16042, 1

    2023

  153. [165]

    2013, A&A, 549, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220015

    Szalai, T., & Vink´ o, J. 2013, A&A, 549, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220015

    2013 doi

  154. [166]

    2011, A&A, 527, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015624

    Szalai, T., Vink´ o, J., Balog, Z., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015624

    2011 doi

  155. [167]

    2019, ApJ, 876, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d0

    Szalai, T., Vink´ o, J., K¨ onyves-T´ oth, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d0

    2019 doi

  156. [169]

    S., Singh, A., Basu, J., et al

    Teja, R. S., Singh, A., Basu, J., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acef20

    2023 doi

  157. [170]

    2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16043, 1

    Thwaites, J., Vandenbroucke, J., Santander, M., & IceCube Collaboration. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16043, 1

    2023

  158. [171]

    M., Kasliwal, M

    Tinyanont, S., Lau, R. M., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab521b

    2019 doi

  159. [172]

    D., Shahbandeh, M., et al

    Tinyanont, S., Fox, O. D., Shahbandeh, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adccc0

    2025 doi

  160. [173]

    L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A

    Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A. N., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064505, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf

    2018 doi

  161. [174]

    A., Shappee, B

    Tucker, M. A., Shappee, B. J., Huber, M. E., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 124502, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aca719

    2022 doi

  162. [175]

    A., Hinkle, J., Angus, C

    Tucker, M. A., Hinkle, J., Angus, C. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8448

    2024 doi

  163. [176]

    P., & Chugai, N

    Utrobin, V. P., & Chugai, N. N. 2009, A&A, 506, 829, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912273 —. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 5004, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2415

    2009 doi

  164. [177]

    Valiante, R., Schneider, R., Bianchi, S., & Andersen, A. C. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1661, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15076.x van Breemen, J. M., Min, M., Chiar, J. E., et al. 2011, A&A, 526, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811142 Van Dyk, S. D., Szalai, T., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2...

    2009

  165. [178]

    S., Yang, Y., Filippenko, A

    Vasylyev, S. S., Yang, Y., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf1a3

    2023 doi

  166. [179]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  167. [180]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b8

    Wang, T., & Burrows, A. 2024, ApJ, 962, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b8

    2024 doi

  168. [181]

    K., et al

    Watson, D., Christensen, L., Knudsen, K. K., et al. 2015, Nature, 519, 327, doi: 10.1038/nature14164

    2015 doi

  169. [182]

    J., Matsuura, M., & Ercolano, B

    Wesson, R., Barlow, M. J., Matsuura, M., & Ercolano, B. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2089, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2250

    2015 doi

  170. [183]

    F., Peterson, S., Murphy, J., et al

    Williams, B. F., Peterson, S., Murphy, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/105

    2014 doi

  171. [184]

    C., Henderson, C

    Wilson, J. C., Henderson, C. P., Herter, T. L., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 1295–1305, doi: 10.1117/12.550925

    2004 doi

  172. [185]

    H., Rank, D

    Wooden, D. H., Rank, D. M., Bregman, J. D., et al. 1993, ApJS, 88, 477, doi: 10.1086/191830

    1993 doi

  173. [186]

    E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. 2002, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 1015, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015

    2002 doi

  174. [187]

    E., Pinto, P

    Woosley, S. E., Pinto, P. A., & Ensman, L. 1988, ApJ, 324, 466, doi: 10.1086/165908

    1988 doi

  175. [188]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  176. [189]

    2024, Science China

    Xiang, D., Mo, J., Wang, L., et al. 2024, Science China

    2024

  177. [190]

    Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 219514, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2267-0

    doi

  178. [191]

    2023, PASJ, 75, L27, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad051

    Yamanaka, M., Fujii, M., & Nagayama, T. 2023, PASJ, 75, L27, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad051

    2023 doi

  179. [192]

    2023, Science Bulletin, 68, 2548, doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.015

    Zhang, J., Lin, H., Wang, X., et al. 2023, Science Bulletin, 68, 2548, doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.015

    2023 doi

  180. [193]

    V., et al

    Zheng, W., Dessart, L., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade0bf

    2025 doi

  181. [194]

    A., Irani, I., Chen, P., et al

    Zimmerman, E. A., Irani, I., Chen, P., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 759, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07116-6 Zs ´ ıros, S., Szalai, T., De Looze, I., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae507

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.