Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

An introduction to the symmetric group algebra

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read These lecture notes claim that the representation theory of the symmetric groups can be developed from elementary algebra and explicit computation, proving the standard classification, the hook length formula, and explicit bases of the…

desk verdict A careful, half-finished graduate text that delivers on its pedagogy but overpromises with its 'prove in detail' tagline; worth a referee's time if expository work is welcome. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20706 v1 pith:VEU4UCZP submitted 2025-07-28 math.CO math.RAmath.RT

Darij Grinberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.COmath.RAmath.RT MSC 20C3005E1016S34
keywords symmetricgroupalgebraYoungtableauxSpechtmodulesYoung–Jucys–MurphyelementsGarnirrelationsstandardbasistheoremhooklengthformulaMurphycellularbases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These lecture notes aim to prove the representation theory of the symmetric groups from elementary algebra and explicit computation, assuming no prior representation theory. The central target is the characteristic-0 classification: the Specht modules $S^\lambda$, built from Young tableaux, are irreducible, pairwise non-isomorphic, and exhaustive, together with the Garnir relations, the standard basis theorem, the duals of Specht modules, and the hook length formula. The notes also derive several explicit bases of the group algebra $k[S_n]$, including the Young symmetrizer bases and the Murphy cellular bases, and survey less familiar families of elements such as the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements, partial integrals, and random-to-random shuffles. A sympathetic reader would value the text as a single, computationally concrete route through a classical theory, with over 100 exercises; a few results are honestly deferred to external sources.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the group algebra $k[S_n]$, treated as a free module on permutations and made into a ring by composition. Inside it the notes isolate several computational tools: the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements $m_k=\sum_{i<k} t_{i,k}$, the $X$-integrals $\nabla_X$ and sign-integrals $\nabla^-_X$, the row and column symmetrizers of a Young tableau, and the resulting Young symmetrizers. The load-bearing identities are the transposition cancellation theorem $\nabla_X\nabla^-_Y=0$ when $|X\cap Y|>1$, the expansion of products of distinct Young--Jucys--Murphy elements into sums over permutations with prescribed nonstarter sets, and the Garnir relations, which together straighten arbitrary polytabloids into the standard basis indexed by standard tableaux.

What would settle it

Set $k=\mathbb{Z}$ and $n=4$, and compute the element $\prod_{i=-3}^{3}(m_4-i)$ in $k[S_4]$ by expanding into permutations. If the result is not the zero element, Theorem 3.4.5 is false, and with it the notes' claim that the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements satisfy the announced split polynomial relations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of the notes is that a fully elementary and computational development of the representation theory of $S_n$ is possible: after defining $k[S_n]$ as the free $k$-module on permutations, one can introduce the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements $m_k$, the $X$-integrals $\nabla_X$ and sign-integrals $\nabla^-_X$, and the Young symmetrizers, and prove the standard basis theorem by combinatorial straightening arguments. The notes claim that the Specht modules $S^\lambda$ form a complete set of irreducible representations in characteristic $0$, that their dimensions are the numbers $f^\lambda$ of standard tableaux, and that the hook length formula counts these tableaux, while the dual of $S^\lambda$ is described explicitly. They further claim the construction yields explicit bases of $k[S_n]$ itself, including Artin--Wedderburn-type matrix-block bases and the Murphy cellular bases, with the Gelfand--Tsetlin subalgebra and the center described through symmetric polynomials in the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements.

Load-bearing premise

The notes' usefulness as a proof-based introduction depends on the correctness of the results it cites instead of proving, most conspicuously the factorization statement for the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements and the hard half of the center description.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A reader who works through the notes obtains a full proof that the Specht modules $S^\lambda$, for partitions $\lambda$ of $n$, form a complete set of non-isomorphic irreducible $k[S_n]$-modules in characteristic $0$.
  • The standard basis theorem yields the dimension of $S^\lambda$ as the number $f^\lambda$ of standard tableaux of shape $\lambda$, and the hook length formula counts those tableaux explicitly.
  • The Young symmetrizer bases and Murphy bases give explicit bases of $k[S_n]$ itself, making the Artin--Wedderburn decomposition of the algebra concrete.
  • The description of duals of Specht modules and the sign-twist relating $S^\lambda$ to $S^{\lambda'}$ provide an explicit picture of duality in characteristic $0$.
  • The center of $k[S_n]$ is realized as the set of symmetric polynomials in the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements, with the Gelfand--Tsetlin subalgebra sitting between the center and the full group algebra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the notes' pedagogy is to reprove the deferred Young--Jucys--Murphy factorization statement using only the techniques developed in Section 3; the notes explicitly leave that route open.
  • The computational style suggests porting the constructions to a computer algebra system: verifying the standard basis theorem for small $n$ by explicit ranks of straightening matrices would give a concrete check of each proof step.
  • The elementary treatment of $X$-integrals and transposition cancellation could be pushed toward a fully combinatorial proof of the hard direction of the Jucys--Murphy theorem, closing the one gap the notes leave open.
  • The less classical families presented, such as the somewhere-to-below shuffles and random-to-random shuffles, are invitations to recent research problems; if their stated commutation and annihilator theorems are correct, they provide an accessible entry point to those problems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an extensive set of lecture notes, about 800 pages in its current form, developing the group algebra k[S_n] from foundations: monoid algebras, Young–Jucys–Murphy elements, integrals and sign-integrals, conjugacy class sums, group actions and representations, Specht modules, Young symmetrizers, the standard basis and Garnir relations, characters, duals, and the Murphy cellular bases. The abstract promises detailed, elementary proofs of the main representation-theoretic facts, with over 100 exercises and an emphasis on working over an arbitrary base ring. The portions available in detail (roughly Chapters 2 through 3.10, together with the table of contents and structural information about later chapters) are mathematically careful and largely self-contained, but the text also contains several explicitly deferred or cited results, including Theorem 3.4.5, the missing inclusion in Theorem 3.9.11, and the unproved theorems in Section 3.10.

Significance. If the later chapters on Specht modules deliver what the sampled sections suggest, this will be a valuable and unusually transparent reference for the elementary representation theory of symmetric groups. The treatment of YJM elements, X-integrals, and conjugacy-class sums is meticulous, with explicit coefficient comparisons and many worked examples; the exercises are well integrated and the pedagogical framing is honest about difficulty. The manuscript also makes a genuine effort to minimize assumptions on the base ring, which is useful for readers going beyond characteristic 0. The main caveat is that the advertised claim of proving everything 'in detail' is not yet matched by the proof status of several stated results in Chapters 3 and possibly later chapters; this is fixable but needs explicit attention.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.9.3, Theorem 3.9.11] The Jucys–Murphy theorem is the central structural description of Z(k[S_n]), but the proof given is explicitly a 'Partial proof (sketched)': only the '⊇' direction is shown, and the '⊆' direction is called much harder. This is a genuine gap relative to the abstract's promise of detailed proofs. Moreover, the full statement is the natural input for later structural claims about the center, for example in §5.12.7. Please either supply a complete proof, or clearly state in the introduction and abstract that this theorem is quoted from the literature, and list every later section that relies on it.
  2. [§3.4.3, Theorem 3.4.5] The annihilating polynomial for a single YJM element is stated as a theorem and then deferred: 'Alas, this theorem is too hard to be proved right now,' with a citation to a MathOverflow post. If this result is not proved elsewhere in the notes, the self-contained claim of the abstract is not literally true. More importantly, the notes should provide a dependency audit: for Theorem 3.4.5, Theorem 3.9.11, Theorem 3.10.15, and Theorem 3.10.17, state explicitly whether each is used in the proofs of the advertised main facts (irreducibility, Garnir relations, standard basis theorem, duals of Specht modules, hook length formula) and, if so, how the dependency is resolved.
  3. [Abstract and §1] The abstract says 'We prove in detail the main facts ... as well as a number of less known results.' In the body, however, several theorems are stated without proof or with only a citation: Theorem 3.10.6, Theorem 3.10.15, Theorem 3.10.17, and Theorem 3.10.10(b) (the latter appears as an exercise with difficulty 15). This is acceptable in lecture notes if the status of each result is transparent, but as written it overstates the scope of the proofs. I recommend adding a short 'proof status' paragraph in the introduction, or marking each unproved result with a consistent symbol such as 'quoted result', and revising the abstract accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.9.2, Theorem 3.9.9] The proof of the cycle-type characterization of conjugacy is labeled 'Proof sketch' and the proof of Corollary 3.9.10 is also sketched. These are standard facts, but for consistency with the otherwise detailed style, consider moving them to an appendix or marking them as standard quoted results.
  2. [§3.10.1, Theorem 3.10.6] The Eulerian subalgebra theorem is stated with no proof and no exercise reference. Please state whether this is a quoted result or a proof to be supplied in a later chapter, so that readers do not mistake it for a result proved in this text.
  3. [§2.3] The remark that a solver may 'freely use (without proof) the claims of all exercises above it' is useful, but it also means that some results appearing as exercises are not proved in the main text. It would help to list which displayed theorems depend on exercises.
  4. [§3.7.5, Proposition 3.7.13] The proof is very long and contains many nested claims; the internal footnotes are helpful, but the reader would benefit from a short intuitive paragraph before the formal proof explaining the product decomposition w = w1...wk in words.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: deferred theorems are disclosed external citations, not self-feeding derivations.

full rationale

After tracing the main derivation chain — monoid-algebra definitions (Section 3.1), YJM commutativity (Theorem 3.4.2), the product identity (Theorem 3.4.3 via the bijection Theorem 3.4.4), partial integrals, products of distinct YJM elements (Theorem 3.8.14), elementary symmetric polynomials and reflection length (Corollary 3.8.20), and the center description (Theorem 3.9.11) — I find no step in which a claimed output is, by construction or by self-citation, identical to an input. The references to the author's earlier notes (e.g., [Grinbe15] for elementary permutation facts, and [Grinbe23], [Grinbe18], [GriLaf22], [AFBCCL24] for side results) cite independently checkable or explicitly external facts; they are not used as the sole justification of a central theorem that the notes simultaneously claim to prove. The manuscript itself flags two deferred items: Theorem 3.4.5 is left unproved with a citation to Igor Makhlin's MathOverflow post, and the '⊆' direction of the Jucys–Murphy theorem (Theorem 3.9.11) is called 'much harder' and only sketched. These are disclosed omissions relative to the abstract's 'prove in detail' wording, hence completeness risks, but they do not feed the conclusions back into the premises. Similarly, the less-known results in Section 3.10 are quoted with references to Reiner–Saliola–Welker, Lafrenière, and AFBCCL24/BCGS25 rather than proved; that weakens the promise of full proofs, but it is external citation, not circularity. The text contains no fitted parameters that are later relabeled as predictions, and no uniqueness or classification claim is imported solely from the author's own prior work. Accordingly, no circular step meets the required quoted-reduction standard, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central development rests on standard algebraic background and cited references; no free parameters or fitted values appear. Some recent results are imported without proof. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Monoid algebras are well-defined over a commutative ring (Theorem 3.1.3)
    Invoked in Section 3.1.2; proof delegated to [23wa, Theorem 4.1.2].
  • standard math Permutation combinatorics: DCD, sign multiplicativity, reflection length
    Section 2.4.2 cites [21s], [Grinbe15], [22fco] for definitions and proofs.
  • standard math Maschke's theorem and Jordan-Hölder are available tools
    Abstract and Section 2.2 state no representation theory beyond these is used.
  • domain assumption k is a fixed commutative ring throughout
    Standing assumption in Section 2.4.3; all algebras and modules are over this k.
  • domain assumption Several statements in Section 3.10 are asserted without proof and depend on external papers ([ReSaWe11], [Lafren19], [BCGS25], [AFBCCL24])
    These are part of the claimed coverage but not proved in the notes; the author says 'We might prove this eventually.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An introduction to the symmetric group algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VEU4UCZP

@misc{pith2026250720706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An introduction to the symmetric group algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VEU4UCZP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20706}
}
abstract

This is an introduction to the group algebras of the symmetric groups, written for a quarter-long graduate course. After recalling the definition of group algebras (and monoid algebras) in general, as well as basic properties of permutations, we introduce several families of elements in the symmetric group algebras $\mathbf{k}[S_n]$ such as the Young--Jucys--Murphy elements, the (sign-)integrals and the conjugacy class sums. Then comes a chapter on group actions and representations in general, followed by the core of this text: a study of the representations of symmetric groups (i.e., of left $\mathbf{k}[S_n]$-modules), including the classical theory of Young tableaux and Young symmetrizers. We prove in detail the main facts including the characterization of irreducible representations (in characteristic $0$), the Garnir relations, the standard basis theorem, the description of duals of Specht modules, and the hook length formula, as well as a number of less known results. Finally, we describe several bases of $\mathbf{k}[S_n]$ that arise from the study of Specht modules, including the Murphy cellular bases. The methods used are elementary and computational. We aim to assume as little as possible of the base ring $\mathbf{k}$, and to use as little as possible from representation theory (nothing more advanced than Maschke and Jordan--H\"older). Over 100 exercises (without solutions) are scattered through the text.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An exact algorithm for U(N) matrix models in the gauge-invariant singlet sector

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A group-theoretic algorithm computes U(N)-singlet Hamiltonian matrix elements as closed-form polynomials in N, validated for one matrix against the exact fermion mapping.

  2. Rook sums in the symmetric group algebra

    math.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rook sums in the symmetric group algebra satisfy an explicit product rule, have linearly factorable minimal polynomials, and generate ideals whose sizes count pattern-avoiding permutations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    [17f-hw7s] Darij Grinberg, UMN Fall 2017 Math 4990 homework set #7 with solu- tions, http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/17f/hw7os.pdf [19fco] Darij Grinberg, Enumerative Combinatorics: class notes (Drexel Fall 2019 Math 222 notes), 11 September

    work page 2017

  2. [4]

    [Aigner07] Martin Aigner, A Course in Enumeration, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics #238, Springer

    https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/23wa/23wa.pdf [AFBCCL24] Ilani Axelrod-Freed, Sarah Brauner, Judy Hsin-Hui Chiang, Pa- tricia Commins, Veronica Lang, Spectrum of random-to-random shuf- fling in the Hecke algebra, arXiv:2407.08644v2. [Aigner07] Martin Aigner, A Course in Enumeration, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics #238, Springer

    arXiv

  3. [6]

    https://linear.axler.net/ [BCGS25] Sarah Brauner, Patricia Commins, Darij Grinberg, Franco Sali- ola, The q-deformed random-to-random family in the Hecke algebra , arXiv:2503.17580v1. [Beissi87] Janet Simpson Beissinger, Similar constructions for Young tableaux and involutions, and their application to shiftable tableaux , Discrete Mathematics 67 (1987), ...

    work page arXiv 1987

  4. [8]

    The Fundamental Theorem on Symmetric Polynomials: History's First Whiff of Galois Theory

    [BluCos16] Ben Blum-Smith, Samuel Coskey, The Fundamental Theorem on Symmetric Polynomials: History’s First Whiff of Galois Theory , arXiv:1301.7116v5. [Bona22] Miklós Bóna, Combinatorics of Permutations , 3rd edition, Tay- lor&Francis

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [9]

    https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429274107 [BorOls16] Alexei Borodin, Grigori Olshanski, Representations of the infinite symmetric group, Cambridge University Press

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429274107

  6. [13]

    Homological methods and representations of non-commutative algebras

    https://web.archive.org/web/20240430053931/https: //mathsites.unibe.ch/jdraisma/teaching/invtheory0910/ lecturenotes12.pdf Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 821 See https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/algebra/ dgi-errata1.pdf for an inofficial list of errata. [Dumas08] François Dumas, An introduction to noncommutative polynom...

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [19]

    dir/algebrabook.html [GriLaf22] Darij Grinberg, Nadia Lafrenière, The one-sided cycle shuffles in the symmetric group algebra, arXiv:2212.06274v4

    https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~goodman/algebrabook. dir/algebrabook.html [GriLaf22] Darij Grinberg, Nadia Lafrenière, The one-sided cycle shuffles in the symmetric group algebra, arXiv:2212.06274v4. A shortened version has appeared in: Algebraic Combinatorics 7 (2024) no. 2, pp. 275–326. [Grinbe15] Darij Grinberg, Notes on the combinatorial fundamental...

    arXiv 2024

  8. [20]

    [Grinbe18] Darij Grinberg, Is this sum of cycles invertible in Q [Sn]?, answers to MathOverflow question #308536

    http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/primes2015/sols.pdf The numbering of theorems and formulas in this link might shift when the project gets updated; for a “frozen” version whose numbering is guaranteed to match that in the citations above, see https://github.com/darijgr/detnotes/releases/ tag/2022-09-15c or arXiv:2008.09862v3. [Grinbe18] Darij Grinberg,...

    arXiv 2022

Show all 47 references
  1. [21]

    Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 823 [GruSer18] Caroline Gruson, Vera Serganova, A Journey Through Representation Theory, Springer

    https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/24s/peel.pdf [GriRei14] Darij Grinberg, Victor Reiner, Hopf Algebras in Combinatorics , arXiv:1409.8356v7. Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 823 [GruSer18] Caroline Gruson, Vera Serganova, A Journey Through Re...

    2024 arXiv

  2. [24]

    See https://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~klesh/CorrBook.pdf for er- rata. Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 824 [Knuth98] Donald Ervin Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, volume 3: Sorting and Searching, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley

    2024

  3. [28]

    https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/60196 [Liu16] Ricky Ini Liu, Complete branching rules for Specht modules, Journal of Algebra 446 (2016), pp. 77–102. [Liulev80] Arunas Liulevicius, Arrows, symmetries and representation rings , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 19 (1980), pp. 259–273. ...

    2016

  4. [30]

    pdf [Moran92] Gadi Moran, The center of Z [Sn+1] is the set of symmetric polynomi- als in n commuting transposition-sums , Trans

    https://www.math.uni-bonn.de/ag/stroppel/Thesis_Milionis. pdf [Moran92] Gadi Moran, The center of Z [Sn+1] is the set of symmetric polynomi- als in n commuting transposition-sums , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 332 (1992), pp. 167–180. [Morel19] Sophie Morel, Representation theory, ...

    1992

  5. [31]

    pdf Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 826 [Murphy81] G

    https://perso.ens-lyon.fr/sophie.morel/rep_theory_notes. pdf Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 826 [Murphy81] G. E. Murphy, A new construction of Young’s Seminormal Represen- tation of the Symmetric Groups , Journal of Algebra 69 (1981), pp. 287–29...

    1981

  6. [36]

    [Roseng15] Hjalmar Rosengren, Lectures on Representation Theory , 17 October

    https://web.archive.org/web/20240818002142/https: //www.math.ucdavis.edu/~romik/download-book.php See https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~romik/data/uploads/ misc/lisbook-errata.pdf for errata. [Roseng15] Hjalmar Rosengren, Lectures on Representation Theory , 17 October

  7. [38]

    https://alistairsavage.ca/symfunc/notes/ Savage-SymmetricFunctions.pdf Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 828 [Schnei13] Peter Schneider, Modular Representation Theory of Finite Groups , Springer

    2024

  8. [39]

    [Specht35] Wilhelm Specht, Die irreduziblen Darstellungen der symmetrischen Gruppe, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1935), pp. 696–711. [Stanle11] Richard P . Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, volume 1, Second edi- tion, Cambridge University Press

    1935

  9. [40]

    Literatuur

    https://pub.math.leidenuniv.nl/~luijkrmvan/linalg2/2019/ (scroll down to “Literatuur”). [Swan16] Richard G. Swan, On the straightening law for minors of a matrix , arXiv:1605.06696v1. [TauZas59] Olga Taussky, Hans Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix a...

    1959 arXiv

  10. [43]

    [Wildon20] Mark Wildon, An involutive introduction to symmetric functions , 8 May

    http://www.ma.rhul.ac.uk/~uvah099/Maths/Bidigare4.pdf See https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/algebra/ bidigare4-2019-errata.pdf for an inofficial list of errata. [Wildon20] Mark Wildon, An involutive introduction to symmetric functions , 8 May

    2019

  11. [44]

    pdf See http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/algebra/ symfuncs2017-2020-05-08-errata.pdf for an inofficial list of errata

    http://www.ma.rhul.ac.uk/~uvah099/Maths/Sym/SymFuncs2020. pdf See http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/algebra/ symfuncs2017-2020-05-08-errata.pdf for an inofficial list of errata. [Willia03] Geordie Williamson, Mind your P and Q-symbols: Why the Kazhdan- Lusztig basis of the H...

    2020

  12. [47]

    [Zimmer14] Alexander Zimmermann, Representation Theory: A Homological Al- gebra Point of View, Springer 2014

    2014

  13. [513]

    [Murphy95] G. E. Murphy, The representations of Hecke algebras of type A n, J. Algebra 173 (1995), no. 1, pp. 97–121. [Nazaro07] Maxim Nazarov, Representation theory of the symmetric group , 19 December

    1995

  14. [1188]

    Published in: Mem- oirs of the AMS 228 (2014)

    [ReSaWe11] Victor Reiner, Franco Saliola, Volkmar Welker, Spectra of Sym- metrized Shuffling Operators, arXiv:1102.2460v2. Published in: Mem- oirs of the AMS 228 (2014). [Reuten93] Christophe Reutenauer, Free Lie Algebras, Oxford University Press

    2014 arXiv

  15. [1974]

    [BrMaPe16] Murray Bremner, Sara Madariaga, Luiz A. Peresi, Structure theory for the group algebra of the symmetric group, with applications to poly- nomial identities for the octonions , Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 57 (2016), issue 4, pp. 413–452. Symme...

    2016

  16. [1977]

    [Zelevi81a] A. V . Zelevinsky, A generalization of the Littlewood–Richardson rule and the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth correspondence , J. Algebra 69 (1981), pp. 82–94. [Zelevi81b] Andrey V . Zelevinsky, Representations of Finite Classical Groups: A Hopf Algebra Approach, Lecture ...

    1981

  17. [1981]

    [JamMat98] Gordon James, Andrew Mathas, The irreducible Specht modules in characteristic 2, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 31, Issue 4, July 1999, pp. 457–462. [JamPee79] G.D. James and M.H. Peel, Specht series for skew representations of symmetric groups, Journal...

    1979 arXiv

  18. [1991]

    [Wallac88] Nolan R. Wallach, Lie Algebra Cohomology and Holomorphic Contin- uation of Generalized Jacquet Integrals , Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 14 (1988), Representations of Lie Groups, Kyoto, Hi- roshima, 1986, pp. 123–151. [Webb16] Peter Webb, A Course in Finite G...

    1988

  19. [1992]

    Annalen 120 (1947), pp

    https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/462077/ [Wever47] Franz Wever, Über Invarianten in Lie’schen Ringen , Math. Annalen 120 (1947), pp. 563–580. [Weyl53] Hermann Weyl, The classical groups: their invariants and representa- tions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2nd edition

    1947

  20. [1994]

    [Peel71] M

    https://web.math.ku.dk/~olsson/manus/comb_rep_all.pdf [Pak22] Igor Pak, What is a combinatorial interpretation?, arXiv:2209.06142v1. [Peel71] M. H. Peel, Hook representations of the symmetric groups , Glasgow Mathematical Journal 12 (1971), issue 2, pp. 136–149. [Prasad15] Amr...

    1971 arXiv

  21. [1995]

    https://web.archive.org/web/20220119141152/http: //krob.cesames.net/IMG/ps/combi.ps [Kuenze15] Matthias Künzer, Ties for the integral group ring of the symmetric group, thesis at Universität Ulm 1998, version

    1998

  22. [2001]

    [Sagan19] Bruce Sagan, Combinatorics: The Art of Counting , Graduate Studies in Mathematics 210, AMS

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6804-6 See https://users.math.msu.edu/users/bsagan/Books/Sym/ errata.pdf for errata. [Sagan19] Bruce Sagan, Combinatorics: The Art of Counting , Graduate Studies in Mathematics 210, AMS

    doi

  23. [2003]

    pdf for an inofficial list of errata

    See https://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/geordie/pandq-errata. pdf for an inofficial list of errata. Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 830 [Young77] Alfred Young, The Collected Papers of Alfred Young 1873–1940 , Uni- versity of Toronto Press

    2024

  24. [2004]

    See https://site.uvm.edu/rfoote/files/2022/06/errata_3rd_ edition.pdf for errata

    ISBN: 978-0-471-43334-7. See https://site.uvm.edu/rfoote/files/2022/06/errata_3rd_ edition.pdf for errata. [Egge19] Eric S. Egge, An Introduction to Symmetric Functions and Their Com- binatorics, AMS

    2022

  25. [2005]

    [BleLau01] D

    See https://www.mat.uniroma2.it/~brenti/correct.ps for er- rata. [BleLau01] D. Blessenohl and H. Laue, Algebraic combinatorics related to the free Lie algebra, Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 29 (1992). [BleSch05] Dieter Blessenohl, Manfred Schocker, Noncommutative Char...

    1992

  26. [2007]

    1247–1267

    [Purbho22] Kevin Purbhoo, An identity in the Bethe subalgebra of C [Sn], arXiv:2207.05743v2, published in: Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 127 (2023), issue 5, pp. 1247–1267. [ReiShi95a] Victor Reiner, Mark Shimozono, Specht Series for Column-Convex Diagrams, Jo...

    2023 arXiv

  27. [2008]

    [Hodges23] Reuven Hodges, A non-iterative formula for straightening fillings of Young diagrams, arXiv:1710.05214v2, Sel. Math. New Ser. 30, 37 (2024). [Hopkin22] Sam Hopkins, RSK via local transformations, 13 September

    2024 arXiv

  28. [2009]

    html for errata

    See https://web.bentley.edu/empl/c/ncarter/vgt/errata. html for errata. [Clause91] Michael Clausen, Multivariate Polynomials, Standard Tableaux and Representations of Symmetric Groups , J. Symbolic Computation 11 (1991), issues 5–6, pp. 483–522. [Conrad] Keith Conrad, Exposito...

    1991

  29. [2010]

    Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 819 [Axler24] Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right , 4th edition, corrected version 9 March

    See https://math.mit.edu/~poonen/701/comments_algebra.pdf for unofficial errata. Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 819 [Axler24] Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right , 4th edition, corrected version 9 March

    2024

  30. [2011]

    http://www-math.univ-poitiers.fr/~maavl/ Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 825 [Liu10] Ricky Ini Liu, Specht Modules and Schubert Varieties for General Dia- grams, PhD thesis at MIT

    2024

  31. [2015]

    Pseudo- idempotent matrix generating a free module

    https://pnp.mathematik.uni-stuttgart.de/lexmath/kuenzer/ thesis.pdf [Ladisc11] Frieder Ladisch, Answer to MathOverflow question #58776 (“Pseudo- idempotent matrix generating a free module”), https://mathoverflow.net/questions/58776 [Lafren19] Nadia Lafrenière, Valeurs propres ...

    2019 arXiv

  32. [2016]

    https://vferay.perso.math.cnrs.fr/Peccot/ ApprocheDualeVFeray.pdf [FrRoTh54] J. S. Frame, G. d. B. Robinson, and R. M. Thrall, The hook graphs of the symmetric groups, Canadian J. Math. 6 (1954), pp. 316–324. [Fulton97] William Fulton, Young Tableaux, With Applications to Repr...

    1954

  33. [2018]

    [Macdon95] Ian G

    See https://web.archive.org/web/20250123115734/https: //www.math.temple.edu/~lorenz/ToRCorrections.pdf for errata. [Macdon95] Ian G. Macdonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials , Ox- ford Mathematical Monographs, 2nd edition, Oxford Science Pub- lications

  34. [2019]

    See https://www.ericegge.net/cofsf/index.html for corrections and addenda. [EGHetc11] Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel, Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, Elena Yudovina,Introduction to Rep- resentation Theory , with historical interludes by Slava Gero...

    2011

  35. [2020]

    Symmetric group algebras, Spring 2024, version 2025-07-27 page 822 [Garnir50] H. G. Garnir, Théorie de la représentation linéaire des groupes symétriques, Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege (4) 10, No. 2 (1950), pp. 5–100. [Garsia90] Adriano M. Garsia, Combinatorics of the Free Lie Alg...

    1950

  36. [2022]

    http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/19fco/n/n.pdf [21s] Darij Grinberg, An Introduction to Algebraic Combinatorics (Math 531, Winter 2024 lecture notes), 8 February

    2024

  37. [2023]

    Dieker, Franco V

    [DieSal18] Antonius B. Dieker, Franco V . Saliola, Spectral analysis of random- to-random Markov chains, Advances in Mathematics 323 (2018), pp. 427–485. [DipJam85] Richard Dipper, Gordon James, Blocks and idempotents of Hecke alge- bras of general linear groups , Proceedings ...

    2018

  38. [2024]

    https://www.math.ucla.edu/~rse/algebra_book.pdf [Fayers03] Matthew Fayers, On the structure of Specht modules , Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 67 (2003), pp. 85–102. See https://webspace.maths.qmul.ac.uk/m.fayers/papers/ specht3.pdf for a preprint. [Feray16] Va...

    2003

  39. [2025]

    https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/22fco/ [23wa] Darij Grinberg, An introduction to the algebra of rings and fields , 10 March

    http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/21s/lecs.pdf [22fco] Darij Grinberg, Math 220: Enumerative Combinatorics, Fall 2022 . https://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/t/22fco/ [23wa] Darij Grinberg, An introduction to the algebra of rings and fields , 10 March

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.