pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2508.02666 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Testing Dark Matter with Generative Models for Extragalactic Stellar Streams

Jacob Nibauer , Sarah Pearson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords stellar streamsdark matter halosdensity profilesgalactic dynamicsgenerative modelstidal debrisextragalactic streams
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Multiple stellar streams can constrain the full radial density profile of a dark matter halo from center to edge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a generative method that turns images of stellar streams into constraints on the radial density profile of dark matter halos. By simulating thousands of streams inside trial gravitational potentials and comparing the results to data with nested sampling, the work shows that several streams together can determine both the inner and outer density slopes. If correct, this supplies a direct way to test whether dark matter forms a cored center as some alternatives predict or follows the cuspy shape expected in cold dark matter. The same measurements could also link the outer slope to a galaxy's merger history. New wide-field surveys will supply the stream images needed to apply the approach across thousands of galaxies.

Core claim

The authors show that multiple stellar streams can be used to constrain the entire radial density profile of a halo, including both its inner and outer density slopes. They achieve this with a generative approach that creates large numbers of stream realizations in varying trial potentials using GPU-accelerated simulations and fits the models to observations via nested sampling with a custom objective function.

What carries the argument

X-Stream, a generative model that produces thousands of stream realizations in trial gravitational potentials and uses nested sampling to identify density profiles consistent with observed stream morphologies.

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational potential is static and the shapes of the streams are set mainly by the dark matter density profile rather than by baryons or time changes in the potential.

What would settle it

Independent measurements of the same galaxy's halo density profile, for example from satellite kinematics or weak lensing, that disagree with the inner or outer slopes inferred from the streams at high statistical significance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.02666 by Jacob Nibauer, Sarah Pearson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three different dark matter halo density profiles: NFW (solid line), inner core and outer NFW (dotted line), and inner NFW and outer shallower slope (dashed line). We evolve streams in these three potentials to test their sensi￾tivity to changes in the radial profiles. work, we investigate dark matter halos with densities of the form: ρ(r) = ρ0 (r/rs) γ(1 + r/rs) β−γ exp ( −  r rcut 2 ) (1) with: ρ0 = Mh… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two different streams evolved for 5 Gyr in the three potentials shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The precession angle between successive apoc￾enters, θapo, is shown for orbits evolved in potentials with varying inner slopes (top panel) and varying outer slopes (middle panel). In both cases, steeper inner or outer slopes lead to a decrease in θapo. However, the dominant density slope depends on the galactocentric radius of the orbit. The curvature of an orbit (bottom panel) also depends on the in￾ner a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: particles of the inner and outer streams evolved in a NFW halo with a disk. Middle: histogram version of our two streams with a threshold applied to represent mock observations of the densest regions of the streams. Right: Control points (cyan) from the gray histograms, over plotted on the corresponding kernel density estimation (KDE) of the mock streams used in our likelihood evaluations. With too f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Constraints on the 10 free parameters for the inner stream. The black lines show the true parameters. The red and blue points represent two randomly selected good fits within the 68% credible region, while the green point corresponds to a poor fit. We visualize the streams corresponding to these points in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the best fit streams (left column), streams within the 68% confidence region (middle column), and streams deemed to be poor fits (right column). The gray histograms show the input data for the inner stream (top row) and outer stream (bottom row; same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Constraint on the radial density profile from the inner (blue), outer (red), and combined (black dashed curves) stream samples. The true profile is NFW (black line), and the gray region shows the allowed density profiles from our priors. Both streams show comparable constraints on the outer slope, as their orbits are typically a factor of 2× the halo scale radius. However the inner stream places tight… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Degeneracies recovered using our method on the inner stream. First panel: The y-axis shows the ϕ velocity, which is the azimuthal velocity angle from the x−axis, that controls how much of the velocity is along the line-of-sight. The x-axis shows the line-of-sight location, yprog, of the progenitor (i.e. negative value mean in front of the host galaxy while positive values mean farther away). In the top pan… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: black points show the best fit inner stream evolved in a cored halo with γ, β = 0.2, 3. The red points show the input data used to represent the inner stream. Right: constraints on γ and β. The true values of both parameters are shown as black lines. There is a preference for a cored profile. whether our approach can also recover the true poten￾tial parameters if the stream is evolving in a dark matt… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as top row of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Validation that the derived Λ from Eq. ¯ 9 (dashed red curve) matches Λ values measured from many simula￾tions (solid black curve). Under the assumptions of normal￾ity, one can map Λ to a ∆σ deviation by numerically invert￾ing Eq. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Upcoming ground and space-based surveys are poised to illuminate low surface brightness tidal features, providing a new observable connection to dark matter physics. From imaging of tidal debris, the morphology of stellar streams can be used to infer the geometry of dark matter halos. In this paper, we develop a generative approach, X-Stream, which translates stream imaging into constraints on the radial density profile of dark matter halos--from the inner region out to the virial radius. Using the GPU-accelerated code streamsculptor, we generate thousands of stream realizations in trial gravitational potentials and apply nested sampling with a custom objective function to explore viable regions of parameter space. We find that multiple stellar streams can be used to constrain the entire radial density profile of a halo, including both its inner and outer density slopes. These constraints provide a test for alternatives to cold dark matter, such as self-interacting dark matter, which predicts cored density profiles. From cosmological simulations, the outer density slope is expected to correlate with merger histories though remains underexplored observationally. With ongoing and upcoming missions such as Euclid, the Rubin Observatory, ARRAKIHS, and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, X-Stream will enable detailed mapping of dark matter for thousands of galaxies across a wide range of redshifts and halo masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces X-Stream, a generative framework that employs the GPU-accelerated streamsculptor code to produce thousands of stellar stream realizations in trial gravitational potentials, followed by nested sampling with a custom objective function to infer the inner and outer slopes of dark matter halo density profiles from extragalactic stream imaging. The central claim is that multiple streams can constrain the full radial density profile, providing tests for alternatives to cold dark matter such as self-interacting dark matter.

Significance. If validated, the approach would supply a new observational route to map dark matter density profiles across a wide range of halo masses and redshifts using upcoming surveys (Euclid, Rubin, Roman), with particular value for distinguishing cored versus cuspy profiles and linking outer slopes to merger histories. The use of established simulation tools and nested sampling is a clear methodological strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that multiple stellar streams constrain both the inner and outer density slopes is not yet load-bearing without explicit demonstration that stream morphology in the generative model retains sensitivity to the inner halo (e.g., cusp/core) when streams orbit at large galactocentric radii typical of extragalactic detections.
  2. [Methods] Methods/Results: No recovery tests on mock data with known input profiles are reported, leaving the accuracy of the nested-sampling constraints on the two free parameters (inner and outer slopes) unquantified and weakening support for the central claim.
  3. [Assumptions] Assumptions section: The static-potential approximation and neglect of baryonic or time-dependent effects are load-bearing for the inner-slope constraints; a concrete test (e.g., comparison runs with live potentials) is needed to show that recovered inner slopes are driven by data rather than model assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise form of the custom objective function used in the nested sampling step and its relation to the streamsculptor output metrics.
  2. [Discussion] Add a brief discussion of how the method scales to the thousands of galaxies expected from future surveys, including computational cost estimates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments identify important areas for strengthening the manuscript, particularly around explicit demonstrations of sensitivity and validation. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that multiple stellar streams constrain both the inner and outer density slopes is not yet load-bearing without explicit demonstration that stream morphology in the generative model retains sensitivity to the inner halo (e.g., cusp/core) when streams orbit at large galactocentric radii typical of extragalactic detections.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is needed to show that the generative model retains sensitivity to the inner halo slope for streams at large galactocentric radii. Although the full radial potential is used throughout and the nested sampling explores the joint parameter space, we did not isolate this effect with a dedicated test in the submitted version. In the revised manuscript we will add a new analysis subsection and accompanying figure that varies only the inner slope (while holding outer parameters fixed) for mock streams with large apocenters and quantifies the resulting morphological changes. This will make the claim load-bearing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods/Results: No recovery tests on mock data with known input profiles are reported, leaving the accuracy of the nested-sampling constraints on the two free parameters (inner and outer slopes) unquantified and weakening support for the central claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that recovery tests on mock data with known input profiles are required to quantify the accuracy and any biases in the recovered inner and outer slopes. We omitted these tests in the initial submission to focus on framework development. We will add a dedicated recovery-test section in the revised manuscript, generating mock streams from known density profiles, running the full X-Stream pipeline, and reporting recovered parameters, uncertainties, and performance metrics. This will directly support the central claim. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Assumptions] Assumptions section: The static-potential approximation and neglect of baryonic or time-dependent effects are load-bearing for the inner-slope constraints; a concrete test (e.g., comparison runs with live potentials) is needed to show that recovered inner slopes are driven by data rather than model assumptions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the static-potential approximation is load-bearing for the inner-slope results. A full set of live-potential comparison runs across the entire nested-sampling ensemble is computationally prohibitive at present. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Assumptions section with additional justification, references to the literature on static approximations for stream modeling, and a limited sensitivity test using a small number of live-potential realizations. We will also explicitly flag dynamic-potential modeling as future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard forward-modeling inference

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of generating stream realizations via streamsculptor in trial gravitational potentials, then using nested sampling with a custom objective function to infer radial density profile parameters (inner and outer slopes) from stream morphology data. This is a conventional simulation-based inference procedure in which the claimed constraints emerge from comparing model outputs to observations rather than from any self-referential definition, renaming of fitted quantities as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps in the abstract or described method reduce the target result to the inputs by construction; the sensitivity of stream morphology to the full potential is an empirical outcome of the generative setup, not an imposed equivalence. The approach remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as mock data tests.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard galactic dynamics assumptions plus free parameters for the halo density profile that are fitted to match stream morphology.

free parameters (2)
  • inner density slope
    Parameter of the trial halo density profile that is varied and constrained by the nested sampling.
  • outer density slope
    Parameter of the trial halo density profile that is varied and constrained by the nested sampling.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stellar stream morphology is a direct tracer of the underlying gravitational potential set by the dark matter halo.
    Invoked when generating stream realizations in trial potentials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5763 in / 1275 out tokens · 54665 ms · 2026-05-19T00:28:32.499916+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad159c

    Aganze, C., Pearson, S., Starkenburg, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad159c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad159c 2024

  2. [2]

    Amorisco, N. C. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 575, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv648

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv648 2015

  3. [3]

    E., Panithanpaisal, N., et al

    Arora, A., Sanderson, R. E., Panithanpaisal, N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac93fb 2022

  4. [4]

    E., et al

    Arora, A., Garavito-Camargo, N., Sanderson, R. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade30d Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade30d 2025

  5. [5]

    Avila-Reese, V., Firmani, C., Klypin, A., & Kravtsov, A. V. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 527, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02968.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02968.x 1999

  6. [6]

    E., Evans, N

    Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., Evans, N. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1862

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1862 2014

  7. [7]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Bonaca, A., & Hogg, D. W. 2018, ApJ, 867, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da 2018

  9. [9]

    Bonaca, A., & Price-Whelan, A. M. 2025, NewAR, 100, 101713, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101713

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101713 2025

  10. [10]

    K., & Kallivayalil, N

    Bovy, J., Bahmanyar, A., Fritz, T. K., & Kallivayalil, N. 2016, ApJ, 833, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/31

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/31 2016

  11. [11]

    2018, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 0.3.13

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 0.3.13. http://github.com/jax-ml/jax

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Brooks, R. A. N., Garavito-Camargo, N., Johnston, K. V., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad93a7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad93a7 2025

  13. [13]

    Buist, H. J. T., & Helmi, A. 2015, A&A, 584, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526203

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526203 2015

  14. [14]

    S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 2017

  15. [15]

    S., & Johnston, K

    Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, doi: 10.1086/497422

    work page doi:10.1086/497422 2005

  16. [16]

    L., Sand, D

    Carlin, J. L., Sand, D. J., Price, P., et al. 2016, ApJL, 828, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/l5 2016

  17. [17]

    L., Garling, C

    Carlin, J. L., Garling, C. T., Peter, A. H. G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c32

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c32 2019

  18. [18]

    D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21871.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.3282M 426, 3282

    Cole, D. R., Dehnen, W., Read, J. I., & Wilkinson, M. I. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 601, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21885.x Crnojevi´ c, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/19

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21885.x 2012

  19. [19]

    Diemer, B., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2014, ApJ, 789, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/1 2014

  20. [20]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1685, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2311

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2311 2022

  21. [21]

    Dubinski, J., & Carlberg, R. G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496, doi: 10.1086/170451

    work page doi:10.1086/170451 1991

  22. [22]

    L., & Belokurov, V

    Erkal, D., Sanders, J. L., & Belokurov, V. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1590, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1400

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1400 2016

  23. [23]

    Erkal, D., Belokurov, V., Laporte, C. F. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2685, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1371 Euclid Collaboration: Laigle, C., Gouin, C., Sarron, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15333, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15333

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1371 2019

  24. [24]

    A., Huang, S., & Weinberg, M

    Fardal, M. A., Huang, S., & Weinberg, M. D. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1198

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1198 2015

  25. [25]

    A., Weinberg, M

    Fardal, M. A., Weinberg, M. D., Babul, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1121

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1121 2013

  26. [26]

    E., Sand, D

    Fielder, C. E., Sand, D. J., Jones, M. G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 982, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbf17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbf17 2025

  27. [27]

    A., & Primack, J

    Flores, R. A., & Primack, J. R. 1994, ApJL, 427, L1, doi: 10.1086/187350

    work page doi:10.1086/187350 1994

  28. [28]

    S., White, S

    Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Davis, M., & Efstathiou, G. 1988, ApJ, 327, 507, doi: 10.1086/166213

    work page doi:10.1086/166213 1988

  29. [29]

    2004, MNRAS, 348, 1355, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07453.x

    Gentile, G., Salucci, P., Klein, U., Vergani, D., & Kalberla, P. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 903, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x 2004

  30. [30]

    K., Balogh, M

    Goerdt, T., Moore, B., Read, J. I., Stadel, J., & Zemp, M. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1073, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10182.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10182.x 2006

  31. [31]

    2022, in EAS2022, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 1507

    Guzman, R., G´ omez-Flechoso, M., Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., et al. 2022, in EAS2022, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 1507

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15589, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15589

    Hainje, C., Slone, O., Lisanti, M., & Erkal, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15589, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15589

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15589 2025

  33. [33]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.22155, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.22155

    Hayashi, K., Kaneda, Y., Mori, M., & Shinozaki, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.22155, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.22155

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22155 2025

  34. [34]

    Hendel, D., & Johnston, K. V. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2472, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2035

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2035 2015

  35. [35]

    P., Tremaine, S., & Witten, E

    Hui, L., Ostriker, J. P., Tremaine, S., & Witten, E. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 043541, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043541 2017

  36. [36]

    2001, Nature, 412, 49, doi: 10.1038/35083506

    Tanvir, N. 2001, Nature, 412, 49, doi: 10.1038/35083506

    work page doi:10.1038/35083506 2001

  37. [37]

    N., et al

    Ivezic, Z., Axelrod, T., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2008, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 176, 1, doi: 10.2298/SAJ0876001I Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.2298/saj0876001i 2008

  38. [38]

    P., & Suto, Y

    Jing, Y. P., & Suto, Y. 2002, ApJ, 574, 538, doi: 10.1086/341065 23

    work page doi:10.1086/341065 2002

  39. [39]

    Johnston, K. V. 1998, ApJ, 495, 297, doi: 10.1086/305273

    work page doi:10.1086/305273 1998

  40. [40]

    V., Sackett, P

    Johnston, K. V., Sackett, P. D., & Bullock, J. S. 2001, ApJ, 557, 137, doi: 10.1086/321644

    work page doi:10.1086/321644 2001

  41. [41]

    E., Hendel, D., et al

    Kado-Fong, E., Greene, J. E., Hendel, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f0 2018

  42. [42]

    Kawata, D., & Gibson, B. K. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 908, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06356.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06356.x 2003

  43. [43]

    G., & Navarro, J

    Kazantzidis, S., Abadi, M. G., & Navarro, J. F. 2010, ApJL, 720, L62, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L62

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/l62 2010

  44. [44]

    E., Rix, H.-W., & Hogg, D

    Koposov, S. E., Rix, H.-W., & Hogg, D. W. 2010, ApJ, 712, 260, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/260

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/260 2010

  45. [45]

    E., Erkal, D., Li, T

    Koposov, S. E., Erkal, D., Li, T. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4936, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad551

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad551 2023

  46. [46]

    Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. 1951, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 79, doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 K¨ upper, A. H. W., Balbinot, E., Bonaca, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/80 K¨ upper, A. H. W., Lane, R. R., & Heggie, D. C. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2700, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20242.x

    work page doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 1951

  47. [47]

    Lange, J. U. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 3181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2441

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2441 2023

  48. [48]

    R., & Majewski, S

    Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. 2010, ApJ, 714, 229, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/229

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 2010

  49. [49]

    S., & Schombert, J

    Lelli, F., McGaugh, S. S., & Schombert, J. M. 2016, AJ, 152, 157, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 2016

  50. [50]

    S., Erkal, D., et al

    Lilleengen, S., Petersen, M. S., Erkal, D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 774, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3108 Macci` o, A. V., Paduroiu, S., Anderhalden, D., Schneider, A., & Moore, B. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1105, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21284.x

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3108 2023

  51. [51]

    1997, PASA, 14, 52, doi: 10.1071/AS97052 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Pe˜ narrubia, J., Gabany, R

    Malin, D., & Hadley, B. 1997, PASA, 14, 52, doi: 10.1071/AS97052 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Pe˜ narrubia, J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 184, doi: 10.1086/592555 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Romanowsky, A. J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2012, ApJL, 748, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L24 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Cooper, A. P., Rom´ an, J., et al. 2023, A&...

    work page doi:10.1071/as97052 1997

  52. [52]

    W., Irwin, M

    McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 66, doi: 10.1038/nature08327 Mir´ o-Carretero, J., Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., G´ omez-Flechoso, M. A., et al. 2024a, A&A, 691, A196, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451685 —. 2024b, A&A, 691, A196, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451685

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08327 2009

  53. [53]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03585, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03585

    Martinez-Delgado, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03585, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03585

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.03585 2024

  54. [54]

    1975, PASJ, 27, 533

    Miyamoto, M., & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533

    work page 1975

  55. [55]

    1994, Nature, 370, 629, doi: 10.1038/370629a0

    Moore, B. 1994, Nature, 370, 629, doi: 10.1038/370629a0

    work page doi:10.1038/370629a0 1994

  56. [56]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563, doi: 10.1086/177173 —. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493, doi: 10.1086/304888

    work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  57. [57]

    2023, PhRvD, 107, 043015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043015

    Nguyen, T., Mishra-Sharma, S., Williams, R., & Necib, L. 2023, PhRvD, 107, 043015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043015 2023

  58. [58]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee

    Ho, S. 2022, ApJ, 940, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee 2022

  59. [59]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.07187, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.07187

    Nibauer, J., & Bonaca, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.07187, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.07187

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07187 2025

  60. [60]

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., & Johnston, K. V. 2023, ApJ, 954, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc 2023

  61. [61]

    2024, ApJ, 969, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4299

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., Lisanti, M., Erkal, D., & Hastings, Z. 2024, ApJ, 969, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4299

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4299 2024

  62. [62]

    N., et al

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., Spergel, D. N., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e8 2025

  63. [63]

    A., Brinks, E., et al

    Oh, S.-H., Hunter, D. A., Brinks, E., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 180, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180 2015

  64. [64]

    A., Navarro, J

    Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., Fattahi, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3650, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1504

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1504 2015

  65. [65]

    E., Demirjian, A

    Pearson, S., Clark, S. E., Demirjian, A. J., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 926, 166, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4496

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4496

  66. [66]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2015, ApJ, 799, 28, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/28

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/28 2015

  67. [67]

    M., Hogg, D

    Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 941, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfb

  68. [68]

    K., Johnston, K

    Pearson, S., Starkenburg, T. K., Johnston, K. V., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e06

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e06 2019

  69. [69]

    Pineda, J. C. B., Hayward, C. C., Springel, V., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 63, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3004

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3004 2017

  70. [70]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2017, The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, doi: 10.21105/joss.00388

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00388 2017

  71. [71]

    D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., et al

    Racca, G. D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9904, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. H. A. MacEwen, G. G. Fazio, M. Lystrup, N. Batalha, N. Siegler, & E. C. Tong, 99040O, doi: 10.1117/12.2230762

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2230762 2016

  72. [72]

    I., Iorio, G., Agertz, O., & Fraternali, F

    Read, J. I., Iorio, G., Agertz, O., & Fraternali, F. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2019, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx147

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx147 2017

  73. [73]

    H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al

    Reiprich, T. H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al. 2013, SSRv, 177, 195, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8 24Nibauer & Pearson

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8 2013

  74. [74]

    L., & Binney, J

    Sanders, J. L., & Binney, J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1813, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt806

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt806 2013

  75. [75]

    E., Helmi, A., & Hogg, D

    Sanderson, R. E., Helmi, A., & Hogg, D. W. 2015, ApJ, 801, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/98

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/98 2015

  76. [76]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 923, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e93

    Shipp, N., Erkal, D., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e93

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e93 2021

  77. [77]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., et al. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1503.03757, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1503.03757

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03757 2015

  78. [78]

    N., & Steinhardt, P

    Spergel, D. N., & Steinhardt, P. J. 2000, PhRvL, 84, 3760, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3760

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.3760 2000

  79. [79]

    C., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J

    Straight, M. C., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.16602, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.16602

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.16602 2025

  80. [80]

    E., Kaplinghat, M., & Bullock, J

    Strigari, L. E., Kaplinghat, M., & Bullock, J. S. 2007, PhRvD, 75, 061303, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.061303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.061303 2007

Showing first 80 references.