Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Sarcasm?

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a training-free framework combining object-level visual grounding with external conceptual knowledge improves both sarcasm detection and explanation in large vision-language models.

desk verdict The abstract is plausible but the full text is an unrelated lattice-QCD paper, so the sarcasm claims are unverifiable as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03654 v1 pith:RNVJ3G2Q submitted 2025-08-05 cs.CL cs.CV

Xinyu Wang , Yue Zhang , Liqiang Jing This is my paper
classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords multimodalsarcasmlargevision-languagemodelsdetectionexplanationobjectextractionexternalknowledgetraining-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Large vision-language models struggle with multimodal sarcasm because they do not fully grasp the objects in an image and lack the commonsense knowledge needed to see the mismatch between text and picture. This paper proposes a training-free framework that extracts objects from the image and injects external conceptual knowledge into the prompt, so the model can compare what is literally shown with what is likely intended. The paper reports that this augmentation improves sarcasm detection and explanation across multiple LVLMs. If correct, the result shows that sarcasm understanding can be improved by better inference-time information rather than by retraining the model. Note that the full text supplied with this entry is a lattice QCD theory manuscript and contains none of the described experiments; the claims below rest on the abstract alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the augmented prompt: an object extractor enumerates the visible entities in the image, and an external knowledge source provides conceptual facts about those entities or the depicted situation. The frozen vision-language model then reasons over the combined text, image, object list, and knowledge. Everything happens at inference time, so the machinery is two information add-ons rather than a learned model.

What would settle it

Run the proposed framework against the same base LVLMs on a held-out multimodal sarcasm test set where the sarcasm turns on textual context rather than visible objects; if detection or explanation accuracy does not beat the unassisted baseline, the claimed role of object extraction is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that two specific failures—insufficient visual understanding and lack of conceptual knowledge—cause vision-language models to miss multimodal sarcasm, and that both failures can be patched without fine-tuning. The proposed framework first performs in-depth object extraction, then enriches the model's context with external conceptual knowledge, and only then asks the model to detect and explain sarcasm. The author's claim is that this training-free prompting strategy yields measurable gains in both tasks over unassisted LVLMs.

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on the assumption that the existing multimodal sarcasm datasets, the object-extraction tool, and the external knowledge sources are sufficient and unbiased, and with no matching full text the validity of that assumption cannot be checked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing LVLMs can become better at sarcasm detection without additional training, simply from object grounding and factual enrichment.
  • Sarcasm explanation, not just detection, improves, meaning the models can state why an image-text pair is sarcastic.
  • The specific failure modes identified—weak object recognition and absent conceptual knowledge—are the bottlenecks the framework targets.
  • Improvements across multiple models suggest the method transfers beyond a single architecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial note: the supplied full text is an unrelated lattice QCD computation, so the experimental claims from the abstract cannot be verified from the provided material.
  • If the framework works as claimed, a natural test is to ablate each module separately; the paper's logic predicts that removing either object extraction or conceptual knowledge degrades performance.
  • A plausible extension is to apply the same object-plus-knowledge prompting to neighbouring multimodal pragmatic phenomena, such as irony and metaphor, which also depend on literal-versus-intended mismatches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission, identified by its abstract as a cs.CL paper on multimodal sarcasm understanding, claims to evaluate large vision-language models on multimodal sarcasm detection and explanation and to propose a training-free framework that integrates in-depth object extraction and external conceptual knowledge to improve performance. The supplied full text, however, is an unrelated lattice QCD paper on B to K lepton decays, arXiv:2508.03655v2 [hep-lat], and contains no material on sarcasm, vision-language models, datasets, or experiments. As received, the manuscript therefore consists solely of the abstract and a GitHub URL, with no supporting methods or results for the stated claims.

Significance. If the claimed framework were fully described and validated, the contribution could be useful: a training-free augmentation of large vision-language models for multimodal sarcasm detection and explanation, with code released, would be a practical and reproducible addition to the area. However, the manuscript as submitted provides no evidence for these claims. There are no datasets, baselines, ablations, metrics, or result tables, and the body of the paper is unrelated to the abstract. Consequently, the significance of the work cannot be assessed from the submitted artifact, and the central contribution is currently unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (p. 1) vs. abstract] The central claim that 'the experimental results on multiple models show the effectiveness of our proposed framework' has no supporting evidence anywhere in the supplied manuscript: the full text is the lattice QCD paper 'Theoretical framework for lattice QCD computations of B to K lepton decays...' with footer 'arXiv:2508.03655v2 [hep-lat]', and none of the sections, equations, or tables concern multimodal sarcasm. No datasets, model names, object-extraction tool, external knowledge source, metrics, baselines, ablations, or result tables appear. This is a load-bearing absence that prevents any evaluation of the claimed contribution.
  2. [Abstract (framework description)] The proposed framework is not defined: the terms 'in-depth object extraction' and 'external conceptual knowledge' are introduced without any specification of the extraction tool, the knowledge source, how they are integrated, or why the framework is training-free. Since the submitted text provides no method section, the reader cannot determine whether the external knowledge source is independent of the evaluation annotations, which is necessary to rule out circularity in the claimed improvements.
  3. [Abstract (evaluation claim)] The claimed experimental results over 'multiple models' cannot be checked because the manuscript reports no evaluation protocol: there is no list of benchmark datasets, no evaluation metrics for detection or explanation, no baselines, and no statistical comparison. This absence is not a minor omission; it removes the empirical basis for the paper's headline claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title and abstract] The terminology is inconsistent: the abstract uses 'Large Visual Language Models' while the title uses 'Large Vision-Language Models'; the terminology should be unified throughout.
  2. [Abstract (code availability)] The GitHub URL is given without a version identifier or commit hash; for reproducibility, a versioned release or archival link (e.g., Zenodo DOI) should be provided.
  3. [Abstract (references)] No references to existing multimodal sarcasm datasets or prior LVLM evaluation work are supplied in the abstract; a complete manuscript would need to cite and describe these to position the contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established: the abstract's claim is unevaluable because the supplied full text is a different arXiv paper, and the mismatched lattice-QCD text itself contains no derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript's abstract claims that a training-free framework combining 'in-depth object extraction and external conceptual knowledge' improves multimodal sarcasm detection and explanation, but the supplied full text is an unrelated lattice QCD paper, self-identified in its footer as arXiv:2508.03655v2 [hep-lat], not the target 2508.03654. Because the actual method section, benchmark datasets, object-extraction tool, knowledge source, baselines, ablations, and result tables are absent, there is no derivation chain from which a circularity could be exhibited. Under the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted, no such reduction exists in the evidence provided, and any suspicion that the external conceptual knowledge might derive from the same annotations used for evaluation is speculation, not a demonstrated circular step. The lattice-QCD text that is supplied is also not circular in any exhibitable way: its spectral-density framework builds on HLT and SFR methods cited from external prior work, the renormalization conditions are imposed from symmetries and Ward identities rather than fitted to the target amplitudes, and the exploratory comparison to the vacuum-saturation model fixes the model normalization below the J/psi threshold before comparing above threshold. The correct finding is therefore 'no significant circularity on the supplied evidence,' with the important caveat that the abstract's central claim is unverifiable from this input rather than independently confirmed.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no numerical parameters, equations, or model components are disclosed, and the full text is an unrelated lattice QCD manuscript.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Existing multimodal sarcasm datasets and evaluation metrics reliably capture sarcasm understanding
    The abstract evaluates LVLMs on Multimodal Sarcasm Detection and Explanation, which presupposes that the datasets and metrics are valid. This cannot be verified from the abstract alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Sarcasm?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RNVJ3G2Q

@misc{pith2026250803654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Sarcasm?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RNVJ3G2Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03654}
}
read the original abstract

Sarcasm is a complex linguistic phenomenon that involves a disparity between literal and intended meanings, making it challenging for sentiment analysis and other emotion-sensitive tasks. While traditional sarcasm detection methods primarily focus on text, recent approaches have incorporated multimodal information. However, the application of Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) in Multimodal Sarcasm Analysis (MSA) remains underexplored. In this paper, we evaluate LVLMs in MSA tasks, specifically focusing on Multimodal Sarcasm Detection and Multimodal Sarcasm Explanation. Through comprehensive experiments, we identify key limitations, such as insufficient visual understanding and a lack of conceptual knowledge. To address these issues, we propose a training-free framework that integrates in-depth object extraction and external conceptual knowledge to improve the model's ability to interpret and explain sarcasm in multimodal contexts. The experimental results on multiple models show the effectiveness of our proposed framework. The code is available at https://github.com/cp-cp/LVLM-MSA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GRASP: Grounded CoT Reasoning with Dual-Stage Optimization for Multimodal Sarcasm Target Identification

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GRASP improves multimodal sarcasm target identification by anchoring visual regions in grounded chain-of-thought reasoning and using dual-stage optimization on a new balanced dataset.

  2. GRASP: Grounded CoT Reasoning with Dual-Stage Optimization for Multimodal Sarcasm Target Identification

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GRASP uses grounded chain-of-thought with a coordinate-weighted SFT stage and a GRPO-style policy-optimization stage to identify sarcasm targets in text and images, evaluated on the authors' new MSTI-MAX dataset.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Let ˜J µ em(q) be the Fourier transform ofJ µ em(x). We compute the matrix elements ⟨s(˜ps)| � T[ ˜J µ em(˜q)OSMom 1,2 (0)] � Lat a |b(˜pb)⟩ and, using the appropriate projectors, ⟨s(˜ps)|¯s(0)γνPLb(0) |b(˜pb)⟩ (µ, ν= 1 - 4) in the Landau gauge, at the kinematics chosen for the RI-SMom renormalization, ˜p2 b = ˜p2 s = ˜q2 = µ2 in the limit of zero quark m...

  2. [2]

    By electromagnetic gauge invariance⟨s(˜ps)|T[ ˜J µ em(˜q)O(c) 1,2(0)]|b(˜pb)⟩is proportional to (˜q2gµν −˜qµ ˜qν)⟨s(˜ps)|¯s(0)γνPLb(0)|b(˜pb)⟩

  3. [3]

    We define the bilocal operator in the RI-SMom scheme by � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OSMom 1,2 (0)] � SMom µ ≡ � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OSMom 1,2 ]−(q 2gµν −q µqν)c 1,2(µ, a) ¯s(0)γµPLb(0) � Lat a .(A2)

    Next, at the renormalization point, we impose the condition ⟨s(˜ps)|T[ ˜J µ em(˜q)OSMom 1,2 (0)]−c 1,2(µ, a) (˜q2gµν −˜qµ ˜qν)¯s(0)γνPLb(0)|b(˜pb)⟩= 0 (A1) and determine the coefficientsc 1,2(µ, a). We define the bilocal operator in the RI-SMom scheme by � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OSMom 1,2 (0)] � SMom µ ≡ � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OSMom 1,2 ]−(q 2gµν −q µqν)c 1,2(µ, a) ¯s(0)γµ...

  4. [4]

    charming penguins

    Renormalization of the operatorO 8 The elimination of the power divergences of the chromomagnetic operators ¯sγ5σ·Gb and ¯sσ·Gb is much simpler since they can only mix with the pseudo-scalar and scalar densities with quadratically divergent coefficients. Thus, for example, we may eliminate the quadratic divergence of the operator ¯sγ5σ·Gbby imposing the c...

    1967

  5. [5]

    Using this procedure, the hadronic matrix elements of � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OMS 1,2 (0)] � MS µ , with all divergences renormalized in the MS scheme, can be obtained from lattice computations combined with, as usual and unavoidably, perturbation theory to match the RI-SMom scheme to MS . In higher orders of QCD perturbation theory, the operator O7 appears and, w...

  6. [6]

    The subtraction of the quadratically divergent term proceeds exactly as in Eq. (109). Similarly, one can show that for the parity conserving operators O± V V+AA, the extension of Rsp 5b ×R sp 5s to valence quarks is sufficient to eliminate the mixing with the opposite parity operators ¯sγ5σ·Gb and ¯sγ5b as well as with all other parity conserving or viola...

  7. [7]

    The relation between the local operators O1,2 in the RI-SMom and MS schemes, after subtraction of the power divergences, is obtained perturbatively in the standard way and here we assume that this has been done. Similarly the bilocal operator renormalized in the MS scheme is related to � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OSMom 1,2 (0)] � SMom µ by � T[ ˜J µ em(q)OMS 1,2 (0)] ...

  8. [8]

    Ammaret al.(CLEO), Evidence for penguins: First observation ofB→K ∗(892)γ, Phys

    R. Ammaret al.(CLEO), Evidence for penguins: First observation ofB→K ∗(892)γ, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 674 (1993)

    1993

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions BR(B0 →K ⋆0γ)/BR(Bs0 →ϕγ ) and the direct CP asymmetry inB 0 →K ⋆0γ, Nucl

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions BR(B0 →K ⋆0γ)/BR(Bs0 →ϕγ ) and the direct CP asymmetry inB 0 →K ⋆0γ, Nucl. Phys. B867, 1 (2013), arXiv:1209.0313 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Duttaet al.(Belle), Search for B0 s →γγ and a measurement of the branching fraction for B0 s →ϕγ , Phys

    D. Duttaet al.(Belle), Search for B0 s →γγ and a measurement of the branching fraction for B0 s →ϕγ , Phys. Rev. D91, 011101 (2015), arXiv:1411.7771 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of Photon Polarization in the b→sγ Transition, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of Photon Polarization in the b→sγ Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 161801 (2014), arXiv:1402.6852 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), First experimental study of photon polarization in radiative B0 s decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), First experimental study of photon polarization in radiative B0 s decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 021801 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 109901 (2017)], arXiv:1609.02032 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of CP -violating and mixing-induced observables in B0 s →ϕγ decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of CP -violating and mixing-induced observables in B0 s →ϕγ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 081802 (2019), arXiv:1905.06284 [hep-ex]

    2019

  6. [14]

    Aaltonenet al.(CDF), Measurements of the Angular Distributions in the Decays B→K (∗)µ+µ− at CDF, Phys

    T. Aaltonenet al.(CDF), Measurements of the Angular Distributions in the Decays B→K (∗)µ+µ− at CDF, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 081807 (2012), arXiv:1108.0695 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Angular Distributions in the Decays B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Angular Distributions in the Decays B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D79, 031102 (2009), arXiv:0804.4412 [hep-ex]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. T. Weiet al.(Belle), Measurement of the Differential Branching Fraction and Forward-Backward Asymmetry for B→K (∗)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 171801 (2009), arXiv:0904.0770 [hep-ex]

    2009 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, JHEP08, 131, arXiv:1304.6325 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, JHEP08, 131, arXiv:1304.6325 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 191801 (2013), arXiv:1308.1707 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Angular Analysis and Branching Fraction Measurement of the Decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, Phys

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Angular Analysis and Branching Fraction Measurement of the Decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−, Phys. Lett. B727, 77 (2013), arXiv:1308.3409 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP02, 104, arXiv:1512.04442 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP02, 104, arXiv:1512.04442 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Angular analysis of the decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− from pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Angular analysis of the decay B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− from pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B753, 424 (2016), arXiv:1507.08126 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Wehleet al.(Belle), Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys

    S. Wehleet al.(Belle), Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 111801 (2017), arXiv:1612.05014 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of angular parameters from the decay B 0 → K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B781, 517 (2018), arXiv:1710.02846 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Angular analysis of B0 d →K ∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10, 047, arXiv:1805.04000 [hep-ex]

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Angular analysis of B0 d →K ∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10, 047, arXiv:1805.04000 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of CP -Averaged Observables in the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− Decay, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of CP -Averaged Observables in the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011802 (2020), arXiv:2003.04831 [hep-ex]

    2020

  18. [26]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗(892)0µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗(892)0µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B864, 139406 (2025), arXiv:2411.11820 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Search for the decays B0 →e +e−γ and B0 →µ +µ−γ, Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Search for the decays B0 →e +e−γ and B0 →µ +µ−γ, Phys. Rev. D77, 011104 (2008), arXiv:0706.2870 [hep-ex]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of the B0 s →µ +µ− decay properties and search for the B0 →µ +µ− and B0 s →µ +µ−γ decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of the B0 s →µ +µ− decay properties and search for the B0 →µ +µ− and B0 s →µ +µ−γ decays, Phys. Rev. D105, 012010 (2022), arXiv:2108.09283 [hep-ex]

    2022

  21. [29]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Search for theB 0 s →µ +µ−γdecay, JHEP07, 101, arXiv:2404.03375 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Search for theB 0 s →µ +µ−γdecay, JHEP07, 101, arXiv:2404.03375 [hep-ex]

  22. [30]

    Hansen, A

    M. Hansen, A. Lupo, and N. Tantalo, Extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators, Phys. Rev. D99, 094508 (2019), arXiv:1903.06476 [hep-lat]. 49

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz, Spectral-function determination of complex electroweak amplitudes with lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D108, 074510 (2023), arXiv:2306.07228 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Amplitude Analysis of the B0�K*0 µ+µ- Decay, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Amplitude Analysis of the B0�K*0 µ+µ- Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 131801 (2024), arXiv:2312.09115 [hep-ex]

    2024

  25. [33]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Determination of short- and long-distance contributions in B0�K*0 µ+µ- decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Determination of short- and long-distance contributions in B0�K*0 µ+µ- decays, Phys. Rev. D109, 052009 (2024), arXiv:2312.09102 [hep-ex]

    2024

  26. [34]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the in B0�K*0 µ+µ- decay, JHEP09, 026, arXiv:2405.17347 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the in B0�K*0 µ+µ- decay, JHEP09, 026, arXiv:2405.17347 [hep-ex]

  27. [35]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality using B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality using B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 151601 (2014), arXiv:1406.6482 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality withB 0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP08, 055, arXiv:1705.05802 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality withB 0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP08, 055, arXiv:1705.05802 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Search for lepton-universality violation in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Search for lepton-universality violation in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191801 (2019), arXiv:1903.09252 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nature Phys.18, 277 (2022), [Addendum: Nature Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nature Phys.18, 277 (2022), [Addendum: Nature Phys. 19, (2023)], arXiv:2103.11769 [hep-ex]

    2022

  31. [39]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Tests of lepton universality using B0 →K 0 Sℓ+ℓ− and B+ →K ∗+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Tests of lepton universality using B0 →K 0 Sℓ+ℓ− and B+ →K ∗+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 191802 (2022), arXiv:2110.09501 [hep-ex]

    2022

  32. [40]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 051803 (2023), arXiv:2212.09152 [hep-ex]

    2023

  33. [41]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− and B0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− and B0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D108, 032002 (2023), arXiv:2212.09153 [hep-ex]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Alguer´ o, B

    M. Alguer´ o, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, P. Masjuan, and J. Matias, Are we overlooking lepton flavour universal new physics inb→sℓℓ?, Phys. Rev. D99, 075017 (2019), arXiv:1809.08447 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hurth, F

    T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Model independent analysis of the angular observables in B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− andB + →K ∗+µ+µ−, Phys. Rev. D103, 095020 (2021), arXiv:2012.12207 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Altmannshofer and P

    W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 952 (2021), arXiv:2103.13370 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Gubernari, M

    N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusiveb→sµ +µ− processes, JHEP09, 133, arXiv:2206.03797 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Alguer´ o, A

    M. Alguer´ o, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, To (b)e or not to (b)e: no electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 648 (2023), arXiv:2304.07330 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wen and F

    Q. Wen and F. Xu, Global fits of new physics in b�s after the RK(*) 2022 release, Phys. Rev. D108, 095038 (2023), arXiv:2305.19038 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bordone, G

    M. Bordone, G. isidori, S. M¨ achler, and A. Tinari, Short- vs. long-distance physics inB→K (∗)ℓ+ℓ−: a data-driven analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 547 (2024), arXiv:2401.18007 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Guadagnoli, C

    D. Guadagnoli, C. Normand, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, Insights on the current semi-leptonic B-decay discrepancies — and how Bs�µ +µ−γcan help, JHEP10, 102, arXiv:2308.00034 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ciuchini, M

    M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, S. Mishima, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil in the Standard Model: a theoretical reappraisal, JHEP06, 116, arXiv:1512.07157 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ciuchini, M

    M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Lessons from the B0,+ →K ∗0,+µ+µ− angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D103, 015030 (2021), arXiv:2011.01212 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ciuchini, M

    M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Charming penguins and lepton universality violation inb→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 64 (2023), arXiv:2110.10126 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Ciuchini, M

    M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare B decays, Phys. Rev. D107, 055036 (2023), arXiv:2212.10516 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Bs →µ +µ−γ decay rate at largeq 2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D109, 114506 (2024), arXiv:2402.03262 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG Review 2024 (2024), arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat]

    Y. Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG Review 2024 (2024), arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    J. C. A. Barata and K. Fredenhagen, Particle scattering in Euclidean lattice field theories, Commun. Math. Phys.138, 507 (1991)

    1991

  49. [57]

    Hashimoto, Inclusive semi-leptonic B meson decay structure functions from lattice QCD, PTEP2017, 053B03 (2017), arXiv:1703.01881 [hep-lat]

    S. Hashimoto, Inclusive semi-leptonic B meson decay structure functions from lattice QCD, PTEP2017, 053B03 (2017), arXiv:1703.01881 [hep-lat]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gambino and S

    P. Gambino and S. Hashimoto, Inclusive Semileptonic Decays from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 032001 (2020), arXiv:2005.13730 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. T. Hansen, H. B. Meyer, and D. Robaina, From deep inelastic scattering to heavy-flavor semileptonic decays: Total rates into multihadron final states from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D96, 094513 (2017), arXiv:1704.08993 [hep-lat]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Bulava and M

    J. Bulava and M. T. Hansen, Scattering amplitudes from finite-volume spectral functions, Phys. Rev. D100, 034521 (2019), arXiv:1903.11735 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bruno and M

    M. Bruno and M. T. Hansen, Variations on the Maiani-Testa approach and the inverse problem, JHEP06, 043, arXiv:2012.11488 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Patella and N

    A. Patella and N. Tantalo, Scattering amplitudes from Euclidean correlators: Haag-Ruelle theory and approximation formulae, JHEP01, 091, arXiv:2407.02069 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Bergamaschi, W

    T. Bergamaschi, W. I. Jay, and P. R. Oare, Hadronic structure, conformal maps, and analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D 50 108, 074516 (2023), arXiv:2305.16190 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bulava, M

    J. Bulava, M. T. Hansen, M. W. Hansen, A. Patella, and N. Tantalo, Inclusive rates from smeared spectral densities in the two-dimensional O(3) non-linearσ-model, JHEP07, 034, arXiv:2111.12774 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC)), Probing the Energy-Smeared R Ratio Using Lattice QCD, Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC)), Probing the Energy-Smeared R Ratio Using Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241901 (2023), arXiv:2212.08467 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bailas, S

    G. Bailas, S. Hashimoto, and T. Ishikawa, Reconstruction of smeared spectral function from Euclidean correlation functions, PTEP2020, 043B07 (2020), arXiv:2001.11779 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gambino, S

    P. Gambino, S. Hashimoto, S. M¨ achler, M. Panero, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, A. Smecca, and N. Tantalo, Lattice QCD study of inclusive semileptonic decays of heavy mesons, JHEP07, 083, arXiv:2203.11762 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Barone, S

    A. Barone, S. Hashimoto, A. J¨ uttner, T. Kaneko, and R. Kellermann, Approaches to inclusive semileptonic B(s)-meson decays from Lattice QCD, JHEP07, 145, arXiv:2305.14092 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Kellermann, Z

    R. Kellermann, Z. Hu, A. Barone, A. Elgaziari, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and A. J¨ uttner, Inclusive semileptonic decays from lattice QCD: Analysis of systematic effects, Phys. Rev. D112, 014501 (2025), arXiv:2504.03358 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Evangelista, R

    A. Evangelista, R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz (Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive hadronic decay rate of the τ lepton from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D108, 074513 (2023), arXiv:2308.03125 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of the τ Lepton from Lattice QCD: The u�s Flavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of the τ Lepton from Lattice QCD: The u�s Flavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 261901 (2024), arXiv:2403.05404 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Bennettet al., Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories, Phys

    E. Bennettet al., Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D110, 074509 (2024), arXiv:2405.01388 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    De Santiset al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys

    A. De Santiset al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054503 (2025), arXiv:2504.06063 [hep-lat]

    2025

  66. [74]

    De Santiset al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys

    A. De Santiset al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121901 (2025), arXiv:2504.06064 [hep-lat]

    2025

  67. [75]

    Bonanno, F

    C. Bonanno, F. D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, and M. Naviglio, Sphaleron rate from a modified Backus-Gilbert inversion method, Phys. Rev. D108, 074515 (2023), arXiv:2305.17120 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Panero, A

    M. Panero, A. Smecca, N. Tantalo, and D. Vadacchino, The quenched glueball spectrum from smeared spectral densities, PoSLA TTICE2023, 050 (2024), arXiv:2311.14806 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Beneke, G

    M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization for B→ππ decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1914 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9905312

    1999 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Beneke, G

    M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization for exclusive, nonleptonic B meson decays: General arguments and the case of heavy light final states, Nucl. Phys.B591, 313 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006124 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Beneke, G

    M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization in B→πK, ππ decays and extraction of Wolfenstein parameters, Nucl. Phys.B606, 245 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104110 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Ciuchini, E

    M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguins in B decays, Nucl. Phys. B501, 271 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703353

    1997 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ciuchini, R

    M. Ciuchini, R. Contino, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguin enhanced B decays, Nucl. Phys. B 512, 3 (1998), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 531, 656–660 (1998)], arXiv:hep-ph/9708222

    1998 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Ciuchini, E

    M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, M. Pierini, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguins strike back, Phys. Lett. B515, 33 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104126

    2001 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Khodjamirian, T

    A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. Pivovarov, and Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect inB→K (∗)ℓ+ℓ− andB→K ∗γ, JHEP 09, 089, arXiv:1006.4945 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Khodjamirian, T

    A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang, B→Kℓ +ℓ− decay at large hadronic recoil, JHEP02, 010, arXiv:1211.0234 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Isidori, Z

    G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, Explicit estimate of charm rescattering in B0�K0 ℓ� ℓ, Phys. Rev. D111, 093007 (2025), arXiv:2405.17551 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Martinelli, C

    G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, A General method for nonperturbative renormalization of lattice operators, Nucl. Phys.B445, 81 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9411010 [hep-lat]

    1995 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Sturm, Y

    C. Sturm, Y. Aoki, N. H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C. T. C. Sachrajda, and A. Soni, Renormalization of quark bilinear operators in a momentum-subtraction scheme with a nonexceptional subtraction point, Phys. Rev. D80, 014501 (2009), arXiv:0901.2599 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Frezzotti, P

    R. Frezzotti, P. A. Grassi, S. Sint, and P. Weisz (Alpha), Lattice QCD with a chirally twisted mass term, JHEP08, 058, arXiv:hep-lat/0101001

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Bochicchio, L

    M. Bochicchio, L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi, and M. Testa, Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice with Wilson Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B262, 331 (1985)

    1985

  82. [90]

    Martinelli, S

    G. Martinelli, S. Petrarca, C. T. Sachrajda, and A. Vladikas, Nonperturbative renormalization of two quark operators with an improved lattice fermion action, Phys. Lett. B311, 241 (1993), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 317, 660 (1993)]

    1993

  83. [91]

    Jansen, C

    K. Jansen, C. Liu, M. Luscher, H. Simma, S. Sint, R. Sommer, P. Weisz, and U. Wolff, Nonperturbative renormalization of lattice QCD at all scales, Phys. Lett. B372, 275 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9512009

    1996 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Maiani, G

    L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nonperturbative subtractions in the heavy quark effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B368, 281 (1992)

    1992

  85. [93]

    Frezzotti and G

    R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Chirally improving Wilson fermions. II. Four-quark operators, JHEP10, 070, arXiv:hep- lat/0407002

  86. [94]

    Dawson, G

    C. Dawson, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi, C. T. Sachrajda, S. R. Sharpe, M. Talevi, and M. Testa, New lattice approaches to 51 the delta I = 1/2 rule, Nucl. Phys. B514, 313 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9707009

    1998 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Constantinou, M

    M. Constantinou, M. Costa, R. Frezzotti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, D. Meloni, H. Panagopoulos, and S. Simula, Renormal- ization of the chromomagnetic operator on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D92, 034505 (2015), arXiv:1506.00361 [hep-lat]

    2015 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D111, 054502 (2025), arXiv:2411.08852 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Desiderioet al., First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys

    A. Desiderioet al., First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D103, 014502 (2021), arXiv:2006.05358 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Borsanyiet al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature593, 51 (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 [hep-lat]

    S. Borsanyiet al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature593, 51 (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [99]

    R. L. Workmanet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  92. [100]

    N. H. Christ, X. Feng, A. Portelli, and C. T. Sachrajda (RBC, UKQCD), Prospects for a lattice computation of rare kaon decay amplitudes IIK→πν¯νdecays, Phys. Rev. D93, 114517 (2016), arXiv:1605.04442 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.