pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2503.12263 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.IM· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

Aaron Rase, Achim Stahl, Adam Burrows, Adam Pound, Adrian Abac, Adriana R. Raduta, Adrian Macquet, Adrian Zink, Alba Romero-Rodriguez, Alberto Colombo, Alberto Mariotti, Alberto Masoni, Albino Perego, Alejandra Gonzalez, Alejandro Torres-Forne, Alessandra Buonanno, Alessandro Agapito, Alessandro Cardini, Alessandro Nagar, Alessandro Patruno, Alessandro Pedrotti, Alessandro Pesci, Alessio Ludovico De Santis, Alex Amato, Alexander C. Jenkins, Alexander Sevrin, Alexander van der Horst, Alexandra Mitchell, Alex B. Nielsen, Alice Bonino, Alice Borghese, Alicia M. Sintes, Alisha Marriott-Best, Amata Mercurio, Andrea Begnoni, Andrea Contu, Andrea Cozzumbo, Andrea Maselli, Andrea Melandri, Andrea Rossi, Andrea Sanna, Andreas Bauswein, Andreas Freise, Andreas Haungs, Andreas Zmija, Andrew Levan, Andrew L. Miller, Andrew Spencer, Angelica Albertini, Angelique Lartaux-Vollard, Angelo Ricciardone, Anna Green, Annalisa Allocca, Anna Puecher, Annarita Margiotta, Anthea F. Fantina, Antonino Chiummo, Antonio Perreca, Antonio Riotto, Antonio Stamerra, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Anuradha Samajdar, Archisman Ghosh, Ardiana Nela, Arianna Renzini, Armen Sedrakian, Armin Numic, Arus Harutyunyan, Astrid Lamberts, Balazs Kacskovics, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Barbara Patricelli, Benjamin Schwab, Biswajit Banerjee, Boris Goncharov, Boyuan Liu, Bruno Giacomazzo, Brynmor Haskell, Carlo Contaldi, Carlo Giunchi, Carlos F. Sopuerta, Carmelita Carbone, Carole Perigois, Cecilio Garcia-Quiros, Celine Peroux, Cezary Turski, Chang-Hee Kim, Charles Badger, Charlotte Benning, Chiranjib Mondal, Christophe Detavernier, Christopher P. L. Berry, Chris Van Den Broeck, Chunglee Kim, Conor Mow-Lowry, Conrado Albertus, Costantino Pacilio, Cristiano Palomba, Cristiano Ugolini, Daniela Doneva, Daniela Pascucci, Daniel Barta, Daniele A. Steer, Daniele Melini, Daniele Vernieri, Danny Laghi, Dario Bettoni, David Barba-Gonzalez, Davide Rozza, David Izquierdo Villalba, Davi Rodrigues, Delphine Perrodin, Dicong Liang, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, Domenico D'Urso, Dorota Rosinska, Duvier Suarez, Edoardo Giangrandi, E. K. Porter, Elena Cuoco, Elena Valenti, Eleonora Loffredo, Elias C. Vagenas, Elisa Bortolas, Elisa Maggio, Ema Dimastrogiovanni, Emanuele Berti, Emanuele Tofani, Enis Belgacem, Enrico Calloni, Enrico Cappellaro, Enzo Brocato, Erika Korb, Ettore Majorana, Eugenio Benedetti, Eugenio Coccia, Eva Lope-Oter, Fabian Gittins, Fabian R. N. Schneider, Fabio Antonini, Fabio Garufi, Fabrizio Barone, Fausto Acernese, Federica Fabrizi, Federica Santucci, Federico Angeloni, Federico De Santi, Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada, Filippo Martelli, Filippo Santoliquido, Fiorella Burgio, Floor S. Broekgaarden, Francesca Onori, Francesco Chiadini, Francesco Cireddu, Francesco Crescimbeni, Francesco De Marco, Francesco Iacovelli, Francesco Piergiovanni, Francesco Quochi, Francois Foucart, Francois Larrouturou, Freija Beirnaert, Gabriele Balbi, Gabriele Franciolini, Gabriele Perna, Gabriel Martinez-Pinedo, Gaetano Lambiase, Garvin Yim, Gary Hemming, Geoffrey Compere, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Geraint Pratten, Geraldine Servant, Gerardo Iannone, Gergely Dalya, Giacomo Ciani, Giancarlo Ghirlanda, Gianfranco Bertone, Gianluca Calcagni, Gianluca Inguglia, Gianluca Maria Guidi, Gianmassimo Tasinato, Gijs Nelemans, Giorgio Mentasti, Giovanni Carapella, Giovanni Diaferia, Giovanni Losurdo, Giovanni Maria Tomaselli, Giulia Capurri, Giulia Cusin, Giulia Illuminati, Giulia Pagliaroli, Giuseppe Greco, Giuseppe Muscas, Gor Oganesyan, Gregoire Lacaille, Guerino Avallone, Guido Zavattini, Guillem Domenech, Hannah Duval, Hao-Jui Kuan, Harald Luck, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Harsh Narola, Hector O. Silva, Helvi Witek, Hojae Ahn, Iain Martin, Ian Jones, Igor Andreoni, Ik Siong Heng, Ines Francesca Giudice, Innocenzo Pinto, Irene Molinari, Irina Dvorkin, Isaac C. F. Wong, Isabela Matos, Ish Gupta, Ivan de Martino, Jacopo Fumagalli, Jacopo Tissino, Jade Powell, Jan Harms, Janis Woehler, Jan Steinhoff, Jennifer Docherty, Jerome Degallaix, Jerome Novak, Jesse van Dongen, Jessica Steinlechner, Jishnu Suresh, Joachim Wolf, John Antoniadis, John Veitch, Jonathan Gair, Jorden De Bolle, Joris van Heijningen, Jose J. Blanco-Pillado, Jose Luis Blazquez Salcedo, Josiel Mendonca Soares de Souza, J. Perret, J. Rubio, Juan Garcia-Bellido, June Gyu Park, Justin Janquart, Kamiel Janssens, Karen Haughian, Katharina-Sophie Isleif, Kostas Kokkotas, Kyungmin Kim, Lara Nava, Laszlo Arpad Gergely, Laura Bernard, Laura Silenzi, Laurent Pinard, Lavinia Heisenberg, Leonardo Gualtieri, Leonardo Lucchesi, Lewis Croney, Lia Lavezzi, Liam Shelling Neto, Lieke A. C. van Son, Lijing Shao, Lorenzo Mereni, Lorenzo Mirasola, Lorenzo Pompili, Lorenzo Valbusa Dall'Armi, Luca Graziani, Luca Massaro, Luca Naticchioni, Luciano Di Fiore, Luciano Errico, Lucia Papalini, Lucia Trozzo, Luise Kranzhoff, Maarten van de Meent, Mairi Sakellariadou, Manuel Arca Sedda, Marc Andres-Carcasona, Marco Antonelli, Marco Drago, Marco Limongi, Marco Olivieri, Marco Orsini, Marco Ricci, Marco Vardaro, Margot Hennig, Maria Angeles Perez-Garcia, Mariafelicia De Laurentis, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Maria Haney, Maria Teresa Botticella, Mariateresa Crosta, Marica Branchesi, Marie Anne Bizouard, Marina Nery, Mario Martinez, Mario Spera, Mark Hannam, Markus Bachlechner, Mar Mezcua, Martina Di Cesare, Martin Obergaulinger, Martyna Chruslinska, Massimiliano Razzano, Massimo Della Valle, Massimo Granata, Massimo Vaglio, Mathieu Puech, Matteo Bachetti, Matteo Breschi, Matteo Bruno, Matteo Califano, Matteo Di Giovanni, Matteo Fasiello, Matteo Montani, Matteo Tagliazucchi, Mauro Pieroni, Maxence Corman, Maxime Fays, M. Celeste Artale, Micaela Oertel, Michal Bejger, Michalis Agathos, Michela Mapelli, Michele Lenzi, Michele Maggiore, Michele Mancarella, Michele Moresco, Michele Punturo, Michele Valentini, Miguel Bezares, Miguel Quartin, Miguel Vanvlasselaer, Mika Gaedtke, Mikhail Korobko, Milan Wils, Monica Colpi, M. Paola Vaccaro, Nancy Elias-Rosa, Nanda Rea, Nandini Hazra, Nathan Holland, Nazanin Davari, Niccolo Muttoni, Nicola Bartolo, Nicola Bellomo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Nicola Tamanini, Nico Wagner, Niklas Nippe, Nikolaos Stergioulas, Nils Andersson, Oliver Gerberding, Oliver Long, Om Sharan Salafia, Oriol Pujolas, Ornella Juliana Piccinni, Oussama El Mecherfi, Pablo Cerda-Duran, Pablo Marchant, Pablo Navarro Moreno, Paola Leaci, Paola Puppo, Paolo D'Avanzo, Paolo Pani, Patrice Verdier, Patricia Schmidt, Patrick Baer, Paul Laycock, Peera Simakachorn, Peter Gordon Murray, Peter T. H. Pang, Peter Van, Philippa Cole, Philipp Mosta, Piero Rapagnani, Piero Rettegno, Pierre Auclair, Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente, Pooya Saffarieh, Prasanta Char, Qian Hu, Rafael A. Porto, Raffaella Schneider, Raissa F. P. Mendes, Ralf S. Klessen, Ramiro Cayuso, Raul Abramo, Reinhardt Omondi Rading, Riccardo della Monica, Riccardo De Salvo, Riccardo Murgia, Riccardo Sturani, Riccardo Travaglini, Richard Brito, Roberta De Simone, Robert Joppe, Roberto Casadio, Robert Szabo, Rob Fender, Robin Cornelissen, Rocco D'Agostino, Rocco Romano, Rosalba Fittipaldi, Rosario De Rosa, Rosa Valiante, Rossella Gamba, Sabrina D'Antonio, Sachiko Kuroyanagi, Samaya Nissanke, Samuele Ronchini, Sascha Husa, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Sebastian Steinlechner, Sergio Cristallo, Shaun Swain, Shreevathsa Chalathadka Subrahmanya, Sibilla Di Pace, Silvia Piranomonte, Silvia Toonen, Simone Albanesi, Simone Bini, Simone Blasi, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Sofia Bisero, Sofia Canevarolo, Soumen Roy, Spina Cianetti, Ssohrab Borhanian, Stefan Danilishin, Stefan Funk, Stefan Hild, Stefano Ascenzi, Stefano Bagnasco, Stefano Foffa, Stefano Schmidt, Stefano Torniamenti, Stephane Goriely, Stephen Fairhurst, Stephen Smartt, Steven Schramm, Stoytcho Yazadjiev, Sumi Lee, Sumin Lee, Sumit Kumar, Sungho Lee, Susanna D. Vergani, Swetha Bhagwat, Sylvain Chaty, Sylvain Marsat, Tania Regimbau, Tanja Hinderer, Tassos Fragos, T. G. F. Li, Thomas M. Tauris, Thomas P. Sotiriou, Thomas Thummler, Tim Dietrich, Tim Kuhlbusch, Timo Butz, Tista Mukherjee, Tito Dal Canton, Tobias Fischer, Tomas Andrade, Tomasz Bulik, Tommaso Chiarusi, Tom Niggemann, Ulyana Dupletsa, Valentina Mangano, Valeria Sequino, Valerio Bozza, Valerio De Luca, Van Long Hoang, Veronica Granata, Victoria Graham, Vijay Varma, Ville Vaskonen, Vincenzo Fiumara, Vincenzo Pierro, Viola De Renzis, Violetta Sagun, Viviana Fafone, Viviana Fanti, Walter Del Pozzo, Yufeng Li, Zeb van Ranst

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMnucl-th
keywords discussobservatoriesthird-generationwillastrophysicaldifferenteinsteinextreme
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Einstein Telescope (ET) is the European project for a gravitational-wave (GW) observatory of third-generation. In this paper we present a comprehensive discussion of its science objectives, providing state-of-the-art predictions for the capabilities of ET in both geometries currently under consideration, a single-site triangular configuration or two L-shaped detectors. We discuss the impact that ET will have on domains as broad and diverse as fundamental physics, cosmology, early Universe, astrophysics of compact objects, physics of matter in extreme conditions, and dynamics of stellar collapse. We discuss how the study of extreme astrophysical events will be enhanced by multi-messenger observations. We highlight the ET synergies with ground-based and space-borne GW observatories, including multi-band investigations of the same sources, improved parameter estimation, and complementary information on astrophysical or cosmological mechanisms obtained combining observations from different frequency bands. We present advancements in waveform modeling dedicated to third-generation observatories, along with open tools developed within the ET Collaboration for assessing the scientific potentials of different detector configurations. We finally discuss the data analysis challenges posed by third-generation observatories, which will enable access to large populations of sources and provide unprecedented precision.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 29 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions to gravitational scattering are derived at 5PM and 10SF orders, expressed via polylogarithms up to weight three and agreeing with prior results through 6PN.

  2. Tracing Primordial Gravitational Waves via non-Gaussian Signatures of Halo Bias

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tensor-induced non-Gaussianity from primordial gravitational waves generates a unique scale-dependent halo bias correction that can reach order-one amplitude for rare high-redshift halos at z=7.

  3. Gravitational-Bumblebee perturbations: Exact decoupling and isospectrality

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bumblebee gravity perturbations decouple exactly into gravitational and vector sectors, with gravitational modes dynamically immune to Lorentz violation and odd-even parities strictly isospectral.

  4. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

  5. Large-Eccentricity Asymptotics and Fast Analytic Approximation for Fourier modes of Post-Newtonian Eccentric Waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives large-eccentricity asymptotics for post-Newtonian eccentric waveform Fourier modes and builds a fast endpoint-constrained analytic approximation with error under 10^{-3} valid to p=200.

  6. Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Viscous neutron stars have new families of axial oscillation modes without perfect-fluid counterparts, featuring mode avoidance and long-lived modes.

  7. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  8. Pyramid Interferometers: Direct Access to Cosmological Gravitational Wave Chirality

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pyramid interferometers use non-coplanar geometry to create a channel sensitive only to net helicity in the cosmological gravitational wave background while remaining blind to the unpolarized component.

  9. Gravitational wave signal and noise response of an optically levitated sensor in a Fabry-P\'erot cavity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A general relativistic derivation of gravitational wave response in an optically levitated cavity sensor reveals position-dependent strain sensitivity and suppressed input-mirror noise coupling.

  10. Cordierite-based optical resonators with extremely low thermal expansion

    physics.optics 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Cordierite-based resonators with ULE mirrors reach effective CTE near zero over tens of Kelvin via mirror deflection compensating spacer expansion.

  11. Radio sirens: inferring $H_0$ with binary black holes and neutral hydrogen in the era of the Einstein Telescope and the SKA Observatory

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using simulated binary black hole mergers and neutral hydrogen maps, the radio sirens method constrains H0 to 8% precision with 3000 high-SNR events, offering a 90% improvement over standard dark siren analyses.

  12. Prospects for multi-messenger discovery of the gravitational-wave background anisotropies via cross-correlation with galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New simulations show that cross-correlating gravitational wave background anisotropies with galaxy distributions can enable discovery at angular scales of 4-6 degrees with next-generation observatories.

  13. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework with hybrid connection-coefficient computation and adaptive bi-power quadrature yields relative errors of order 10^{-11} and 2-10x speedups over existing packages for total radiativ...

  14. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework computes gravitational-wave fluxes from generic Kerr orbits with 10^{-11} relative errors and speedups of 3-60x over existing packages for low- and high-order modes.

  15. Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.

  16. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  17. Black Hole Binary Detection Landscape for the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Signal-to-Noise Calculations & Science Cases

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LILA can detect IMBH binaries at redshifts 20-30, IMRIs, and provide months-to-years early warnings with high-SNR events for gravity tests.

  18. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  19. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  20. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Machine learning extracts core rotation and signal properties from CCSN gravitational waves, with next-generation detectors constraining rotation beyond 100 kpc for favorable orientations despite some uncertainties.

  21. Reviving Motivated Inflationary Potentials with $K$-inflation in the light of ACT

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    K-inflation with non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) shifts α-attractor T-models and natural inflation into the Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 allowed region while satisfying Swampland conjectures and producing testable GW spectra.

  22. Hawking area law in quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exact Hawking area law from black hole mergers restricts quantum gravity to singular Ricci-flat or specific regular black holes in Stelle and nonlocal theories, derives the standard entropy-area law, and realizes Barr...

  23. Black Hole-Boson Star Binaries: Gravitational Wave Signals and Tidal Disruption

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of black hole-boson star binaries show that scalar self-interactions can suppress tidal disruption while radiative efficiency depends on the chosen potential.

  24. Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

  25. Geometry of transient gravitational waves and estimation of efficiencies of different detector configurations

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A geometrical method is introduced for analyzing transient gravitational waves to estimate efficiencies of different detector configurations.

  26. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

  27. Machine Learning for Multi-messenger Probes of New Physics and Cosmology: A Review and Perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review summarizing machine learning methods for multi-messenger probes of dark matter and new physics, with a proposed plan for future integrated analyses.

  28. Tidal Response of Compact Objects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review summarizes tidal Love numbers and dissipation effects for black holes, neutron stars, and exotic objects, noting vanishing static bosonic Love numbers for black holes in GR but nonzero values for fermions ...

  29. The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 accept novelty 2.0

    The CosmoVerse White Paper compiles observational tensions in cosmology and maps strategies using improved systematics checks and tests of fundamental physics to resolve them.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · cited by 27 Pith papers · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 16, (2017) 161101, arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 no. 2, (2017) L13, arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J-GEM, GROWTH, JAGWAR,...

  5. [5]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021053, arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 4, (2023) 041039, arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Abbott, T

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011048, arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,” arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo,, KAGRA, VIRGO), Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion His- tory from GWTC–3, Astrophys

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3,” Astrophys. J. 949 no. 2, (2023) 76, arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturo et al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  11. [11]

    Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,Class

    S. Hild et al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 no. 7, (2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

  13. [13]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evans et al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM] . – 582 –

  14. [14]

    Evans et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2306.13745 (2023), 2306.13745

    M. Evans et al., “Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee,” arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph.IM]

  15. [15]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,

    M. Maggiore et al., “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 03 (2020) 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    Branchesiet al., Science with the Einstein Tele- scope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    M. Branchesi et al., “Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs,” JCAP 07 (2023) 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor,

    D. Lovelock, “The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor,” J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 874–876

  18. [18]

    Notes Phys.892 3–24 [arXiv:1404.2955]

    T. P. Sotiriou, “Gravity and Scalar Fields,” Lect. Notes Phys. 892 (2015) 3–24, arXiv:1404.2955 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Berti et al., “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 243001, arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments,

    L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1067–1070

  21. [21]

    Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations,

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) L37–L43, arXiv:gr-qc/0604018

  22. [22]

    Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries,

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 024006, arXiv:gr-qc/0604067

  23. [23]

    Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, “Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 122003, arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescop e

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064010, arXiv:1005.0304 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence,

    T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Sturani, and A. Vecchio, “Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 082003, arXiv:1110.0530 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Agathos, W

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, “TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 082001, arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    J. Meidam et al., “Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 4, (2018) 044033, arXiv:1712.08772 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    A no-hair test for binary black holes,

    S. Dhanpal, A. Ghosh, A. K. Mehta, P. Ajith, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “A no-hair test for binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 10, (2019) 104056, arXiv:1804.03297 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    Testing the no-hair nature of binary black holes using the consistency of multipolar gravitational radiation,

    T. Islam, A. K. Mehta, A. Ghosh, V. Varma, P. Ajith, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Testing the no-hair nature of binary black holes using the consistency of multipolar gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 2, (2020) 024032, arXiv:1910.14259 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Binary black hole spectroscopy: a no-hair test of GW190814 and GW190412,

    C. D. Capano and A. H. Nitz, “Binary black hole spectroscopy: a no-hair test of GW190814 and GW190412,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 12, (2020) 124070, arXiv:2008.02248 [gr-qc] . – 583 –

  31. [31]

    Puecher, C

    A. Puecher, C. Kalaghatgi, S. Roy, Y. Setyawati, I. Gupta, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and C. Van Den Broeck, “Testing general relativity using higher-order modes of gravitational waves from binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 8, (2022) 082003, arXiv:2205.09062 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 2, arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, “Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 no. 4, (2018) 46, arXiv:1801.03208 [gr-qc]

  34. [35]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non- precessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal,

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨ urrer, F. Ohme, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 044006, arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

  35. [36]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 044007, arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

  36. [37]

    Hannam, P

    M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Boh´ e, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. P¨ urrer, “Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 no. 15, (2014) 151101, arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

  37. [38]

    Abbottet al

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 12, (2021) 122002, arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

  38. [39]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 3308–3321

  39. [40]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 884–886

  40. [41]

    Scalar gravitational waves from scalar-tensor gravity: Production and response of interferometers,

    S. Capozziello and C. Corda, “Scalar gravitational waves from scalar-tensor gravity: Production and response of interferometers,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1119–1150

  41. [42]

    Primordial production of massive relic gravitational waves from a weak modification of General Relativity,

    C. Corda, “Primordial production of massive relic gravitational waves from a weak modification of General Relativity,” Astropart. Phys. 30 (2008) 209–215, arXiv:0812.0483 [gr-qc]

  42. [43]

    Polarizations of Gravitational Waves in Horndeski Theory,

    S. Hou, Y. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Polarizations of Gravitational Waves in Horndeski Theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 5, (2018) 378, arXiv:1704.01899 [gr-qc]

  43. [44]

    Polarizations of gravitational waves in f(R) gravity,

    D. Liang, Y. Gong, S. Hou, and Y. Liu, “Polarizations of gravitational waves in f(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 10, (2017) 104034, arXiv:1701.05998 [gr-qc]

  44. [45]

    Gauge invariant formulation of metric f(R) gravity for gravitational waves,

    F. Moretti, F. Bombacigno, and G. Montani, “Gauge invariant formulation of metric f(R) gravity for gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 8, (2019) 084014, arXiv:1906.01899 [gr-qc]

  45. [46]

    Einstein-aether waves

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-Aether waves,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 024003, arXiv:gr-qc/0402005

  46. [47]

    Gravitational waves in Einstein-æther and generalized TeVeS theory after GW170817,

    Y. Gong, S. Hou, D. Liang, and E. Papantonopoulos, “Gravitational waves in Einstein-æther and generalized TeVeS theory after GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 8, (2018) 084040, arXiv:1801.03382 [gr-qc] . – 584 –

  47. [48]

    Hinterbichler, Rev

    K. Hinterbichler, “Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671–710, arXiv:1105.3735 [hep-th]

  48. [49]

    Liang, R

    D. Liang, R. Xu, X. Lu, and L. Shao, “Polarizations of gravitational waves in the bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 124019, arXiv:2207.14423 [gr-qc]

  49. [50]

    Gravitational waves from brane world inflation,

    A. V. Frolov and L. Kofman, “Gravitational waves from brane world inflation,” arXiv:hep-th/0209133

  50. [51]

    Gravitational Radiation from Binary Systems in Alternative Metric Theories of Gravity: Dipole Radiation and the Binary Pulsar,

    C. M. Will, “Gravitational Radiation from Binary Systems in Alternative Metric Theories of Gravity: Dipole Radiation and the Binary Pulsar,” Astrophys. J. 214 (1977) 826–839

  51. [52]

    Radiation damping in Einstein-aether theory,

    B. Z. Foster, “Radiation damping in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104012, arXiv:gr-qc/0602004. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 129904 (2007)]

  52. [53]

    Zhang, X

    C. Zhang, X. Zhao, A. Wang, B. Wang, K. Yagi, N. Yunes, W. Zhao, and T. Zhu, “Gravitational waves from the quasicircular inspiral of compact binaries in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 4, (2020) 044002, arXiv:1911.10278 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 104, 069905 (2021)]

  53. [54]

    An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, “An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,” J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) 566–578

  54. [55]

    Gravitational-wave propagation and polarizations in the teleparallel analog of Horndeski gravity,

    S. Bahamonde, M. Caruana, K. F. Dialektopoulos, V. Gakis, M. Hohmann, J. Levi Said, E. N. Saridakis, and J. Sultana, “Gravitational-wave propagation and polarizations in the teleparallel analog of Horndeski gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 084082, arXiv:2105.13243 [gr-qc]

  55. [56]

    Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

  56. [57]

    Jackiw and S.Y

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, “Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 104012, arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

  57. [58]

    The Basics of gravitational wave theory,

    E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, “The Basics of gravitational wave theory,” New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 204, arXiv:gr-qc/0501041

  58. [59]

    Nonlocal theory of massive gravity,

    M. Jaccard, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, “Nonlocal theory of massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 4, (2013) 044033, arXiv:1305.3034 [hep-th]

  59. [60]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology . Oxford University Press, 2018

  60. [61]

    de Rham, G

    C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, “Resummation of Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101, arXiv:1011.1232 [hep-th]

  61. [62]

    Non-local massive gravity,

    L. Modesto and S. Tsujikawa, “Non-local massive gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 48–56, arXiv:1307.6968 [hep-th]

  62. [63]

    Cosmological dynamics and dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of gravity,

    S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, “Cosmological dynamics and dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1450116, arXiv:1311.3435 [hep-th]

  63. [64]

    Phantom dark energy from non-local infrared modifications of General Relativity

    M. Maggiore, “Phantom dark energy from nonlocal infrared modifications of General Relativity,” Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 043008, arXiv:1307.3898 [hep-th]

  64. [65]

    Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,

    M. Maggiore, “Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,” Fundam. Theor. Phys. 187 (2017) 221–281, arXiv:1606.08784 [hep-th]

  65. [66]

    Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models,

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, A. Finke, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “Gravity in the infrared and effective nonlocal models,” JCAP 04 (2020) 010, arXiv:2001.07619 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [67]

    Calcagni, L

    G. Calcagni, L. Modesto, and G. Nardelli, “Non-perturbative spectrum of non-local gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 391–397, arXiv:1803.07848 [hep-th] . – 585 –

  67. [68]

    Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 953–969

  68. [69]

    Gravitational Radiation, Close Binary Systems, and the Brans-dicke Theory of Gravity,

    C. M. Will and H. W. Zaglauer, “Gravitational Radiation, Close Binary Systems, and the Brans-dicke Theory of Gravity,” Astrophys. J. 346 (1989) 366

  69. [70]

    Strong Binary Pulsar Constraints on Lorentz Violation in Gravity,

    K. Yagi, D. Blas, N. Yunes, and E. Barausse, “Strong Binary Pulsar Constraints on Lorentz Violation in Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 no. 16, (2014) 161101, arXiv:1307.6219 [gr-qc]

  70. [71]

    Constraints on Einstein-Æther theory and Hoˇ rava gravity from binary pulsar observations,

    K. Yagi, D. Blas, E. Barausse, and N. Yunes, “Constraints on Einstein-Æther theory and Hoˇ rava gravity from binary pulsar observations,”Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 084067, arXiv:1311.7144 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069902 (2014), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069901 (2014)]

  71. [72]

    Chatziioannou, N

    K. Chatziioannou, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, “Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 022004, arXiv:1204.2585 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129901 (2017)]

  72. [73]

    Barausse, N

    E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain, “Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 24, (2016) 241104, arXiv:1603.04075 [gr-qc]

  73. [74]

    Prob- ing nontensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave ba ckgrounds with ground- based laser interferometers

    A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, K. Hayama, S. Kawamura, and M.-a. Sakagami, “Probing non-tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with ground-based laser interferometers,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 082002, arXiv:0903.0528 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [75]

    Sensitivity of third-generation interferometers to extra polarizations in the stochastic gravitational wave background,

    L. Amalberti, N. Bartolo, and A. Ricciardone, “Sensitivity of third-generation interferometers to extra polarizations in the stochastic gravitational wave background,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 6, (2022) 064033, arXiv:2105.13197 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [76]

    Frequency response of space-based interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,

    D. Liang, Y. Gong, A. J. Weinstein, C. Zhang, and C. Zhang, “Frequency response of space-based interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 10, (2019) 104027, arXiv:1901.09624 [gr-qc]

  76. [77]

    Frequency response of time-delay interferometry for space-based gravitational wave antenna,

    C. Zhang, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, D. Liang, A. J. Weinstein, and C. Zhang, “Frequency response of time-delay interferometry for space-based gravitational wave antenna,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 6, (2019) 064033, arXiv:1906.10901 [gr-qc]

  77. [78]

    Pulsar Timing as a Probe of Non-Einsteinian Polarizations of Gravitational Waves,

    K. J. Lee, F. A. Jenet, and R. H. Price, “Pulsar Timing as a Probe of Non-Einsteinian Polarizations of Gravitational Waves,” The Astrophysical Journal 685 no. 2, (Oct., 2008) 1304–1319

  78. [79]

    Stochastic backgrounds in a lternative theories of gravity: Overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays

    S. J. Chamberlin and X. Siemens, “Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 082001, arXiv:1111.5661 [astro-ph.HE]

  79. [80]

    Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, “Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,” Living Rev. Rel. 20 no. 1, (2017) 2, arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]

  80. [81]

    Measuring the stochastic gravitational radiation background with laser interferometric antennas,

    N. Christensen, “Measuring the stochastic gravitational radiation background with laser interferometric antennas,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5250–5266

Showing first 80 references.