pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.05467 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Combined tracer analysis for DESI 2024 BAO

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords baryon acoustic oscillationsDESItracer combinationgalaxy biaslarge scale structureredshift surveyscosmology
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Merging LRG and ELG tracers with galaxy bias weights improves BAO constraints from DESI DR1 by 11 percent for the isotropic scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to combine luminous red galaxies and emission line galaxies in the same redshift bin to reduce shot noise in baryon acoustic oscillation measurements. By creating a unified catalog and weighting by galaxy bias, the analysis increases the effective number density of tracers. Testing on simulations confirms the method, and applying it to real DESI data yields tighter constraints on the BAO parameters. This approach was used for the most precise BAO measurement in the 0.8 to 1.1 redshift range from the first data release.

Core claim

By developing a pipeline that merges overlapping tracers using galaxy bias as an approximately optimal weight, the combination of LRGs and ELGs in the 0.8 < z < 1.1 range increases the number density and reduces shot noise, leading to an 11% improvement in α_iso and 7% in α_AP constraints when applied to DESI DR1 catalog, consistent with mock tests, and producing the most precise BAO measurement with 0.86% constraint on the distance scale.

What carries the argument

The pipeline that merges overlapping tracers using galaxy bias as an approximately optimal weight, tested on Abacus simulations.

Load-bearing premise

Galaxy bias serves as an approximately optimal weight for merging the tracers, with the assumption that the bias model and mock realism accurately capture real-data covariance and selection effects.

What would settle it

If the improvement in BAO constraints from the combined catalog on real DESI data does not match the 11% and 7% seen in the Abacus mock catalogs, the optimality of the bias weighting would be called into question.

read the original abstract

This paper demonstrates how the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 1 (DR1) and future baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) analyses can optimally combine overlapping tracers (galaxies of distinct types) in the same redshift range. We make a unified catalog of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) and Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) in the redshift range 0.8 < z < 1.1 and investigate the impact on the BAO constraints. DESI DR1 contains ~30% of the final DESI LRG sample and less than 25% of the final ELG sample, and the combination of LRGs and ELGs increases the number density and reduces the shot noise. We developed a pipeline to merge the overlapping tracers using galaxy bias as an approximately optimal weight and tested the pipeline on a suite of Abacus simulations, calibrated on the final version of the DESI Early Data Release. When applying our pipeline to the DESI DR1 catalog, we find an improvement in the BAO constraints of 11% for $\alpha_\mathrm{iso}$ and ~7.0% for $\alpha_\mathrm{AP}$ consistent with our findings in mock catalogs. Our analysis was integrated into the DESI DR1 BAO analysis to produce the LRG+ELG result in the 0.8 < z < 1.1 redshift bin, which provided the most precise BAO measurement from DESI DR1 with a 0.86% constraint on the BAO distance scale and a $9.1\sigma$ detection of the isotropic BAO feature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper presents a pipeline for combining LRG and ELG tracers in the 0.8 < z < 1.1 bin of DESI DR1 using galaxy bias as approximately optimal weights to reduce shot noise and improve BAO constraints. Tested on Abacus mocks calibrated to the Early Data Release, the method yields an 11% improvement in α_iso and ~7% in α_AP when applied to DR1 data, consistent with mock results. The combined catalog was integrated into the official DESI DR1 BAO analysis, producing the most precise measurement in the bin (0.86% on the distance scale, 9.1σ isotropic BAO detection).

Significance. If the result holds, the work provides a practical multi-tracer technique that enhances BAO precision for DESI and similar surveys by increasing effective number density. The mock-to-data consistency and official integration are strengths; the approach is falsifiable via future data releases and supports reproducible analyses when code is shared.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and mock calibration description: The headline 11% / ~7% improvement on actual DR1 data rests on bias weights tuned and validated exclusively on Abacus mocks. The manuscript must demonstrate that these mocks reproduce DR1 number densities, linear bias values, cross-tracer covariance, and key systematics (fiber collisions, completeness) in the 0.8<z<1.1 bin to sufficient accuracy that the weights remain near-optimal; without such a direct mock-data comparison, the reported gain on real data could be misestimated.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction should explicitly define α_iso and α_AP at first use for readers outside the BAO subfield.
  2. Figure captions and table legends would benefit from stating the exact redshift bin and tracer combination used in each panel or row.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the method's significance, and recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [—] Abstract and mock calibration description: The headline 11% / ~7% improvement on actual DR1 data rests on bias weights tuned and validated exclusively on Abacus mocks. The manuscript must demonstrate that these mocks reproduce DR1 number densities, linear bias values, cross-tracer covariance, and key systematics (fiber collisions, completeness) in the 0.8<z<1.1 bin to sufficient accuracy that the weights remain near-optimal; without such a direct mock-data comparison, the reported gain on real data could be misestimated.

    Authors: We agree that a direct mock-data comparison strengthens the claim that the bias weights remain near-optimal when applied to DR1. The Abacus mocks were calibrated to the final DESI Early Data Release (EDR), which uses the same target selection, redshift range, and observational pipeline as the 0.8<z<1.1 portion of DR1. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix (or expanded methods section) that explicitly compares: (i) number densities for LRG and ELG samples, (ii) linear bias values inferred from the large-scale auto- and cross-power spectra, and (iii) the leading elements of the cross-tracer covariance matrix, all measured in the mocks versus the DR1 data in the same bin. We will also document that fiber-collision and completeness systematics are implemented in the mocks using the same angular mask and fiber-assignment algorithm applied to DR1. These additions will confirm that the mock-derived weights are appropriate for DR1 and that the reported 11%/7% gains are not misestimated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper develops a bias-weighted merger pipeline for LRG+ELG tracers, calibrates and validates the weights plus expected gains on independent Abacus mock realizations tuned to the Early Data Release, then applies the fixed pipeline to the separate DESI DR1 catalog to measure the actual 11% and 7% improvements. These measured gains on real data do not reduce by construction to the mock calibration inputs; the central result is an empirical measurement on DR1 whose error bars and significance are determined from the data itself. No self-citation, self-definition, or fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction step is load-bearing for the quoted BAO constraint improvements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method introduces one data-driven weight per tracer type derived from bias measurements; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • galaxy bias weights
    Bias values used to weight LRG and ELG catalogs; estimated from clustering amplitude in mocks or data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Galaxy bias provides an approximately optimal linear combination weight for overlapping tracers
    Invoked when developing the merging pipeline and validated only on the Abacus simulation suite.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6196 in / 1237 out tokens · 34262 ms · 2026-05-19T00:21:54.836800+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Peebles and J.T

    P.J.E. Peebles and J.T. Yu,Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe, ApJ 162 (1970) 815

  2. [2]

    Sunyaev and Y.B

    R.A. Sunyaev and Y.B. Zeldovich,The interaction of matter and radiation in the hot model of the Universe, II, Ap&SS 7 (1970) 20

  3. [3]

    Bond and G

    J.R. Bond and G. Efstathiou,The statistics of cosmic background radiation fluctuations, MNRAS 226 (1987) 655

  4. [4]

    Probing dark energy using baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum as a cosmological ruler

    C. Blake and K. Glazebrook,Probing Dark Energy Using Baryonic Oscillations in the Galaxy Power Spectrum as a Cosmological Ruler, ApJ 594 (2003) 665 [astro-ph/0301632]

  5. [5]

    Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys

    H.-J. Seo and D.J. Eisenstein,Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys, ApJ 598 (2003) 720 [astro-ph/0307460]

  6. [6]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The power spectrum and the matter content of the universe

    W.J. Percival, C.M. Baugh, J. Bland-Hawthorn, T. Bridges, R. Cannon, S. Cole et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the power spectrum and the matter content of the Universe, MNRAS 327 (2001) 1297 [astro-ph/0105252]

  7. [7]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications

    S. Cole, W.J. Percival, J.A. Peacock, P. Norberg, C.M. Baugh, C.S. Frenk et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications, MNRAS 362 (2005) 505 [astro-ph/0501174]

  8. [8]

    Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies

    D.J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, D.W. Hogg, R. Scoccimarro, M.R. Blanton, R.C. Nichol et al., Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, ApJ 633 (2005) 560 [astro-ph/0501171]

  9. [9]

    S. Alam, M. Ata, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, D. Bizyaev, J.A. Blazek et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, MNRAS 470 (2017) 2617 [1607.03155]

  10. [10]

    S. Alam, M. Aubert, S. Avila, C. Balland, J.E. Bautista, M.A. Bershady et al.,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 083533 [2007.08991]

  11. [11]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant, MNRAS 416 (2011) 3017 [1106.3366]

  12. [12]

    Low Redshift Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement from the Reconstructed 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey

    P. Carter, F. Beutler, W.J. Percival, C. Blake, J. Koda and A.J. Ross,Low redshift baryon acoustic oscillation measurement from the reconstructed 6-degree field galaxy survey, MNRAS 481 (2018) 2371 [1803.01746]

  13. [13]

    Neveux, E

    R. Neveux, E. Burtin, A. de Mattia, A. Smith, A.J. Ross, J. Hou et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2, MNRAS 499 (2020) 210 [2007.08999]

  14. [14]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al.,The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Lyα Forests, ApJ 901 (2020) 153 [2007.08995]

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear Evolution of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro,Nonlinear evolution of baryon acoustic oscillations, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 023533 [0704.2783]

  16. [16]

    On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low-Redshift Clustering of Matter

    D.J. Eisenstein, H.-J. Seo and M. White,On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low-Redshift Clustering of Matter, ApJ 664 (2007) 660 [astro-ph/0604361]

  17. [17]

    `Eppur Si Muove': On The Motion of the Acoustic Peak in the Correlation Function

    R.E. Smith, R. Scoccimarro and R.K. Sheth,Motion of the acoustic peak in the correlation function, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 043525 [astro-ph/0703620]. – 25 –

  18. [18]

    Systematic effects in the sound horizon scale measurements

    J. Guzik, G. Bernstein and R.E. Smith,Systematic effects in the sound horizon scale measurements, MNRAS 375 (2007) 1329 [astro-ph/0605594]

  19. [20]

    A 2% Distance to z=0.35 by Reconstructing Baryon Acoustic Oscillations - I : Methods and Application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    N. Padmanabhan, X. Xu, D.J. Eisenstein, R. Scalzo, A.J. Cuesta, K.T. Mehta et al.,A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS 427 (2012) 2132 [1202.0090]

  20. [22]

    Theoretical Systematics of Future Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Surveys

    Z. Ding, H.-J. Seo, Z. Vlah, Y. Feng, M. Schmittfull and F. Beutler,Theoretical systematics of future baryon acoustic oscillation surveys, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (2018) 1021 [Arxiv:1708.01297v2]

  21. [23]

    M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein et al.,The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013, arXiv e-prints (2013) arXiv:1308.0847 [1308.0847]

  22. [24]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]

  23. [25]

    R. Zhou, B. Dey, J.A. Newman, D.J. Eisenstein, K. Dawson, S. Bailey et al.,Target Selection and Validation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies, AJ 165 (2023) 58 [2208.08515]

  24. [26]

    Raichoor, J

    A. Raichoor, J. Moustakas, J.A. Newman, T. Karim, S. Ahlen, S. Alam et al.,Target Selection and Validation of DESI Emission Line Galaxies, AJ 165 (2023) 126 [2208.08513]

  25. [28]

    Mena-Fernández, C

    J. Mena-Fernández, C. Garcia-Quintero, S. Yuan, B. Hadzhiyska, O. Alves, M. Rashkovetskyi et al.,HOD-dependent systematics for luminous red galaxies in the DESI 2024 BAO analysis, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 133 [2404.03008]

  26. [29]

    Garcia-Quintero, J

    C. Garcia-Quintero, J. Mena-Fernández, A. Rocher, S. Yuan, B. Hadzhiyska, O. Alves et al., HOD-dependent systematics in Emission Line Galaxies for the DESI 2024 BAO analysis, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 132 [2404.03009]

  27. [30]

    BOSS collaboration, The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Observational systematics and baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464 (2017) 1168 [1607.03145]

  28. [31]

    Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures

    D. Tseliakhovich and C. Hirata,Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 083520 [1005.2416]

  29. [32]

    Signatures of First Stars in Galaxy Surveys: Multi-Tracer Analysis of the Supersonic Relative Velocity Effect and the Constraints from the BOSS Power Spectrum Measurements

    J. Yoo and U. Seljak,Signatures of first stars in galaxy surveys: Multitracer analysis of the supersonic relative velocity effect and the constraints from the BOSS power spectrum measurements, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 103520 [1308.1401]

  30. [33]

    The BOSS-WiggleZ overlap region I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, J. Koda, F.A. Marín, H.-J. Seo, A.J. Cuesta et al.,The BOSS-WiggleZ overlap region - I. Baryon acoustic oscillations, MNRAS 455 (2016) 3230 [1506.03900]

  31. [34]

    Constraining the relative velocity effect using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey

    F. Beutler, U. Seljak and Z. Vlah,Constraining the relative velocity effect using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, MNRAS 470 (2017) 2723 [1612.04720]

  32. [35]

    Slepian, D.J

    Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, J.A. Blazek, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Marín et al., Constraining the baryon-dark matter relative velocity with the large-scale three-point – 26 – correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS 474 (2018) 2109 [1607.06098]

  33. [36]

    Barreira, G

    A. Barreira, G. Cabass, D. Nelson and F. Schmidt,Baryon-CDM isocurvature galaxy bias with IllustrisTNG, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020 (2020) 005

  34. [37]

    Small-scale structure and the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest baryon acoustic oscillation feature

    C.M. Hirata,Small-scale structure and the Lyman-α forest baryon acoustic oscillation feature, MNRAS 474 (2018) 2173 [1707.03358]

  35. [38]

    S.F. Chen, C. Howlett, M. White, P. McDonald, A.J. Ross, H.J. Seo et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillation theory and modelling systematics for the DESI 2024 results, MNRAS 534 (2024) 544 [2402.14070]

  36. [39]

    DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 012 [2404.03000]

  37. [40]

    The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1611.00037 [1611.00037]

  38. [41]

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 164 (2022) 207 [2205.10939]

  39. [42]

    Silber, P

    J.H. Silber, P. Fagrelius, K. Fanning, M. Schubnell, J.N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,The Robotic Multiobject Focal Plane System of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), AJ 165 (2023) 9 [2205.09014]

  40. [43]

    Raichoor et al., in preparation(2025)

  41. [44]

    Miller, P

    T.N. Miller, P. Doel, G. Gutierrez, R. Besuner, D. Brooks, G. Gallo et al.,The Optical Corrector for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 168 (2024) 95 [2306.06310]

  42. [45]

    Poppett, L

    C. Poppett, L. Tyas, J. Aguilar, C. Bebek, D. Bramall, T. Claybaugh et al.,Overview of the Fiber System for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 168 (2024) 245

  43. [46]

    Schlafly, D

    E.F. Schlafly, D. Kirkby, D.J. Schlegel, A.D. Myers, A. Raichoor, K. Dawson et al.,Survey Operations for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 166 (2023) 259 [2306.06309]

  44. [47]

    Myers, J

    A.D. Myers, J. Moustakas, S. Bailey, B.A. Weaver, A.P. Cooper, J.E. Forero-Romero et al., The Target-selection Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 165 (2023) 50 [2208.08518]

  45. [48]

    Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, A.G. Adame, D. Aguado, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al., Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2503.14745 [2503.14745]

  46. [49]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering et al., Validation of the Scientific Program for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 167 (2024) 62 [2306.06307]

  47. [50]

    J. Guy, S. Bailey, A. Kremin, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto et al.,The Spectroscopic Data Processing Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 165 (2023) 144 [2209.14482]

  48. [51]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 II: sample definitions, characteristics, and two-point clustering statistics, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 017 [2411.12020]

  49. [52]

    A.J. Ross, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, A. Anand, S. Bailey et al.,The construction of large-scale structure catalogs for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 125 [2405.16593]. – 27 –

  50. [53]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectra and redshifts

    M. Colless, G. Dalton, S. Maddox, W. Sutherland, P. Norberg, S. Cole et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts, MNRAS 328 (2001) 1039 [astro-ph/0106498]

  51. [54]

    The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    K.N. Abazajian, J.K. Adelman-McCarthy, M.A. Agüeros, S.S. Allam, C. Allende Prieto, D. An et al.,The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ApJS 182 (2009) 543 [0812.0649]

  52. [55]

    Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release

    S.P. Driver, D.T. Hill, L.S. Kelvin, A.S.G. Robotham, J. Liske, P. Norberg et al.,Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release, MNRAS 413 (2011) 971 [1009.0614]

  53. [56]

    B. Reid, S. Ho, N. Padmanabhan, W.J. Percival, J. Tinker, R. Tojeiro et al.,SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues, MNRAS 455 (2016) 1553 [1509.06529]

  54. [57]

    DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 124 [2404.03001]

  55. [58]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    D. Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,Desi 2024 vi: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, Arxiv:2404.03002v1

  56. [59]

    Power Spectrum Analysis of Three-Dimensional Redshift Surveys

    H.A. Feldman, N. Kaiser and J.A. Peacock,Power-Spectrum Analysis of Three-dimensional Redshift Surveys, ApJ 426 (1994) 23 [astro-ph/9304022]

  57. [60]

    Pinon, A

    M. Pinon, A. de Mattia, P. McDonald, E. Burtin, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, M. White et al., Mitigation of DESI fiber assignment incompleteness effect on two-point clustering with small angular scale truncated estimators, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 131 [2406.04804]

  58. [61]

    DESI and other dark energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements

    A. Font-Ribera, P. McDonald, N. Mostek, B.A. Reid, H.-J. Seo and A. Slosar,DESI and other dark energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements, JCAP 05 (2014) 023 [1308.4164]

  59. [62]

    Garrison, D.J

    L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, D. Ferrer, N.A. Maksimova and P.A. Pinto,The ABACUS cosmological N-body code, MNRAS 508 (2021) 575 [2110.11392]

  60. [63]

    Maksimova, L.H

    N.A. Maksimova, L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and T.P. Satterthwaite,ABACUSSUMMIT: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations, MNRAS 508 (2021) 4017 [2110.11398]

  61. [64]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  62. [65]

    Hadzhiyska, D

    B. Hadzhiyska, D. Eisenstein, S. Bose, L.H. Garrison and N. Maksimova,COMPASO: A new halo finder for competitive assignment to spherical overdensities, MNRAS 509 (2022) 501 [2110.11408]

  63. [66]

    Yuan, L.H

    S. Yuan, L.H. Garrison, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and D.J. Eisenstein,ABACUSHOD: A highly efficient extended multi-tracer HOD framework and its application to BOSS and eBOSS data, MNRAS 510 (2021) 3301 [2110.11412]

  64. [67]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering et al.,The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, AJ 168 (2024) 58 [2306.06308]

  65. [68]

    S. Yuan, H. Zhang, A.J. Ross, J. Donald-McCann, B. Hadzhiyska, R.H. Wechsler et al.,The DESI One-Percent Survey: Exploring the Halo Occupation Distribution of Luminous Red Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects with AbacusSummit, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2306.06314 [2306.06314]

  66. [69]

    Rocher, V

    A. Rocher, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, E. Burtin, S. Yuan, A. de Mattia, A.J. Ross et al.,The DESI One-Percent survey: exploring the Halo Occupation Distribution of Emission Line – 28 – Galaxies with ABACUSSUMMIT simulations, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023 (2023) 016 [2306.06319]

  67. [70]

    M. M. S Hanif et al.,Fast Fiber Assign: Emulating fiber assignment effects for realistic DESI catalogs, in preparation(2025)

  68. [71]

    Lasker, A

    J. Lasker, A. Carnero Rosell, A.D. Myers, A.J. Ross, D. Bianchi, M.M.S. Hanif et al., Production of alternate realizations of DESI fiber assignment for unbiased clustering measurement in data and simulations, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 127 [2404.03006]

  69. [72]

    EZmocks: extending the Zel'dovich approximation to generate mock galaxy catalogues with accurate clustering statistics

    C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, F. Prada, C. Zhao and G. Yepes,EZmocks: extending the Zel’dovich approximation to generate mock galaxy catalogues with accurate clustering statistics, MNRAS 446 (2015) 2621 [1409.1124]

  70. [73]

    Pérez-Fernández, L

    A. Pérez-Fernández, L. Medina-Varela, R. Ruggeri, M. Vargas-Magaña, H. Seo, N. Padmanabhan et al.,Fiducial-cosmology-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 BAO analysis, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 144 [2406.06085]

  71. [74]

    Alcock and B

    C. Alcock and B. Paczynski,An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant, Nature 281 (1979) 358

  72. [75]

    Galaxy Bias and its Effects on the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Measurements

    K.T. Mehta, H.-J. Seo, J. Eckel, D.J. Eisenstein, M. Metchnik, P. Pinto et al.,Galaxy bias and its effects on the baryon acoustic oscillations measurements, The Astrophysical Journal 734 (2011) 94 [Arxiv:1104.1178v1]

  73. [76]

    Reconstructing Baryon Oscillations: A Lagrangian Theory Perspective

    N. Padmanabhan, M. White and J.D. Cohn,Reconstructing baryon oscillations: A lagrangian theory perspective, Physical Review D79 (2008) [ Arxiv:0812.2905v3]

  74. [77]

    Paillas, Z

    E. Paillas, Z. Ding, X. Chen, H. Seo, N. Padmanabhan, A. de Mattia et al.,Optimal reconstruction of baryon acoustic oscillations for DESI 2024, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 142 [2404.03005]

  75. [78]

    Landy and A.S

    S.D. Landy and A.S. Szalay,Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions, ApJ 412 (1993) 64

  76. [79]

    pycorr: Two-point correlation function estimation

    A. de Mattia, M. Rashkovetskyi, M. Sinha and L.H. Garrison, “pycorr: Two-point correlation function estimation.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2403.009, Mar., 2024

  77. [80]

    Sinha and L.H

    M. Sinha and L.H. Garrison,CORRFUNC - a suite of blazing fast correlation functions on the CPU, MNRAS 491 (2020) 3022 [1911.03545]

  78. [81]

    Sinha and L.H

    M. Sinha and L.H. Garrison,Corrfunc: Blazing fast correlation functions with AVX512F SIMD Intrinsics, inSoftware Challenges to Exascale Computing. Second Workshop, pp. 3–20, Jan., 2019, DOI [1911.08275]

  79. [82]

    Improving Cosmological Distance Measurements by Reconstruction of the Baryon Acoustic Peak

    D.J. Eisenstein, H.-J. Seo, E. Sirko and D.N. Spergel,Improving Cosmological Distance Measurements by Reconstruction of the Baryon Acoustic Peak, ApJ 664 (2007) 675 [astro-ph/0604362]

  80. [83]

    X. Chen, Z. Ding, E. Paillas, S. Nadathur, H. Seo, S. Chen et al.,Extensive analysis of reconstruction algorithms for DESI 2024 baryon acoustic oscillations, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2411.19738 [2411.19738]

Showing first 80 references.