Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 8 cited by

ReconVLA: Reconstructive Vision-Language-Action Model as Effective Robot Perceiver

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding a diffusion-based reconstruction of the target-object image region sharpens VLA attention and improves robot manipulation.

desk verdict The gaze-region reconstruction target is the load-bearing unknown—if it is derived from task annotations, the claimed implicit grounding shrinks to auxiliary supervision; the 100k-trajectory corpus is the most tangible asset. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10333 v1 pith:FNUUT2P3 submitted 2025-08-14 cs.RO cs.CV

Wenxuan Song , Ziyang Zhou , Han Zhao , Jiayi Chen , Pengxiang Ding , Haodong Yan , Yuxin Huang , Feilong Tang
show 2 more authors
Donglin Wang Haoang Li
This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords vision-language-actionmodelrobotmanipulationdiffusiontransformervisualattentiongazeregionimplicitgroundingreconstructionobjectivepretraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ReconVLA proposes that vision-language-action (VLA) models fail at precise manipulation because their visual attention is dispersed across the whole scene instead of focusing on the object to be operated. To fix this, the model is trained to reconstruct the 'gaze region' of the image—the region containing the target object—using a diffusion transformer conditioned on the model's own visual outputs. This reconstruction objective acts as an implicit grounding signal, forcing the visual encoder to retain fine-grained spatial detail about the target and to allocate attention there. The paper reports that this improves manipulation precision and generalization in both simulation and real-robot experiments, supported by a pretraining corpus of over 100,000 trajectories and 2 million samples.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the diffusion-transformer reconstruction head operating on the gaze region. 'Gaze region' is the image area corresponding to the target manipulated object. The head is conditioned on the VLA's visual outputs and trained to reconstruct that region; the reconstruction loss is what converts the task into an attention-guiding signal, forcing the visual encoder to preserve fine-grained detail about the object that the instruction refers to.

What would settle it

Train ReconVLA with the reconstruction loss removed but with otherwise identical data and compute: if manipulation success and attention concentration on target regions do not drop, the reconstruction objective is not doing the claimed work. Alternatively, replace the gaze-region target with random or uniform image patches; if performance is unchanged, the specific choice of target region is not load-bearing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a VLA model's visual representation can be made to attend to the right object by adding a reconstructive head: conditioned on the model's visual outputs, a diffusion transformer reconstructs the gaze region of the image, defined as the pixels containing the target manipulated object. This 'implicit grounding' paradigm replaces explicit bounding-box or mask supervision with a reconstruction loss, which propagates spatially grounded gradient to the visual encoder and prompts it to allocate attention to the target. The paper demonstrates that this design, together with large-scale pretraining, yields more concentrated attention and higher manipulation success in simula

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction targets ('gaze regions') must be reliable annotations of the objects to be manipulated and must be available across all training and evaluation data; if these regions are generated from the same task labels that define success, the attention improvement may be a byproduct of the labels rather than emergent grounding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • VLA manipulation accuracy increases because visual attention is concentrated on the object being manipulated rather than spread across the scene.
  • The model generalizes to new instructions and scenes because the reconstruction objective teaches a transferable spatial prior about where to look.
  • The method injects grounding without requiring explicit bounding-box or segmentation annotations at inference time, using reconstruction as a self-supervised-style signal.
  • The curated pretraining dataset of over 100k trajectories and 2 million samples provides a reusable resource for training visually grounded robot policies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gaze-region annotations are derived automatically from the same task or object labels that define success, the reconstruction loss may partly re-encode the supervision the model already has; a cleaner test would use human eye-tracking or unsupervised saliency as the gaze-region source.
  • The reconstruction head could make attention maps more inspectable, giving developers a direct way to verify that a VLA is looking at the right object before acting.
  • The paradigm may transfer to other perceptual grounding tasks, such as audio-visual localization, where a 'gaze equivalent' can be defined as the region (or time window) to reconstruct.
  • A testable extension is to vary the reconstruction target—full object mask versus a small patch around the object center—to measure how much spatial precision the diffusion head actually needs for the attention gain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ReconVLA, a Vision-Language-Action model augmented with a diffusion-transformer reconstruction objective. Conditioned on the model's visual outputs, the model reconstructs the 'gaze region' of the image, defined as the region corresponding to target manipulated objects. The authors claim that current VLAs disperse visual attention rather than focusing on target regions, and that the proposed reconstructive objective implicitly grounds attention, yielding fine-grained representations and precise manipulation. They report curating a large pretraining set of over 100k trajectories / 2M samples from open-source data and claim extensive simulation and real-world experiments showing superiority. As provided, the manuscript consists only of the abstract, so all technical claims are unverifiable from the submitted text.

Significance. If the central claims were fully supported, the contribution would be significant: a scalable, self-supervised-style objective that improves spatial attention in VLA models could benefit robot manipulation and generalization across sim and real settings. The paper also identifies a real and under-addressed problem—diffuse attention in current VLAs. However, the abstract alone provides no experimental evidence, no precise method definition, and no falsifiable quantitative predictions. The main intellectual risk is that the 'gaze region' target may be derived from the same object/task annotations used for action supervision or success evaluation, in which case the proposed reconstruction would be an extra supervised label rather than a novel implicit-grounding mechanism. This risk is not addressed in the available text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract (motivation)] The claim that 'visual attention is always dispersed' in current VLAs is unquantified and load-bearing. No operational definition of attention, no metric, and no baseline comparison are given. The paper should specify the attention measure (e.g., overlap with target mask, entropy of attention maps, Grad-CAM localization error) and report values for representative VLAs and for ReconVLA. Without this, the motivating failure is not established.
  2. [Abstract (method)] The 'gaze region' reconstruction target is undefined. The abstract only says it 'corresponds to the target manipulated objects.' This is the weakest point: if these regions are generated from the same task/object labels used for action supervision or for success checking, then the reconstruction objective is a supervised auxiliary task that reproduces existing annotation structure, and the claimed 'implicit grounding' improvement may be partly constructed rather than emergent. The paper must state the provenance of gaze regions, how independent they are from action/success labels, and whether they are available at deployment time.
  3. [Abstract (experiments)] The sentence 'Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate the superiority of our implicit grounding method' contains no quantitative results, no baselines, no ablations, no number of trials, and no statistical tests. The central causal claim—that adding the reconstruction loss prompts fine-grained representations and accurate attention—requires an ablation isolating the reconstruction objective, comparisons to VLA baselines with equal additional supervision, and attention metrics before/after training. Without these, the reported superiority is not assessable.
  4. [Abstract (terminology)] Calling the method an 'implicit grounding paradigm' is misleading as stated. The reconstruction loss is explicitly supervised on the gaze region (the target object region). This is more like explicit auxiliary supervision on object localization. The distinction should be clarified, especially because 'implicit' is central to the framing and the claimed contribution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract (terminology)] Define 'gaze region' at first use: is it human gaze, algorithmic saliency, bounding box, or segmentation mask? The current phrasing leaves this ambiguous.
  2. [Abstract (method clarity)] Clarify what exactly is reconstructed: the full image conditioned on the gaze region, or only the gaze-region pixels? The sentence 'reconstruct the gaze region of the image' can be read either way.
  3. [Abstract (data)] The pretraining dataset claim ('over 100k trajectories and 2 million data samples') would benefit from a breakdown of source datasets, data filtering, and whether the gaze-region annotations are manually labeled or automatically generated.
  4. [General] The project page URL is not a substitute for method details in the paper. Technical description, algorithms, hyperparameters, and experimental protocols should be self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No demonstrable circularity in the abstract; gaze-region provenance is an open correctness risk, not a shown circular reduction.

full rationale

The provided manuscript excerpt contains only the abstract and title. On that evidence, the proposed method conditions a diffusion transformer on the model's visual outputs to reconstruct the 'gaze region' of the image, which 'corresponds to the target manipulated objects.' This is presented as an auxiliary reconstruction objective intended to improve visual attention and manipulation. No equation or construction step is provided that would make the reconstruction target formally equivalent to the action supervision, task success criterion, or evaluation labels. The reader's concern that gaze regions 'may' come from the same task/object annotations is conditional and cannot be verified from the abstract alone; per the hard rules, a circularity finding requires quoting the paper and exhibiting the specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction). Neither the provenance of the gaze regions nor any self-citation chain appears in the supplied text. The method is not claimed to be derived from a self-cited uniqueness theorem, and the pretraining dataset is described as curated from open-source robotic datasets, which is not circular. Therefore the correct finding is no significant circularity on the available evidence. The gaze-region provenance should be examined as a correctness and data-construction risk, but it is not a demonstrated circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone, no explicit free parameters or invented entities can be identified. The analysis relies on several domain assumptions about the sufficiency of reconstruction and the validity of gaze region annotations; these are stated in the abstract but not independently justified.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Current VLA models disperse visual attention rather than concentrating on target regions.
    Stated as 'our empirical analysis reveals' in the abstract, but the underlying data and definition of 'dispersed' are not shown; the entire motivation depends on this premise.
  • domain assumption The gaze region of an image corresponds to the target manipulated object and is a useful reconstruction target.
    The abstract defines the reconstruction target as the gaze region corresponding to target objects; if annotations are noisy or derived from task labels, the grounding benefit may be an artifact.
  • ad hoc to paper Reconstructing the gaze region forces the VLA to learn fine-grained spatial representations and allocate attention accurately.
    This is the paper's central causal mechanism, not an independently established result; it is a design hypothesis that experiments are meant to test.
  • domain assumption Open-source robotic datasets are sufficient to pretrain reconstruction at scale and improve generalization.
    The abstract claims 100k trajectories and 2M samples boost generalization, but dataset quality and domain alignment are not argued in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ReconVLA: Reconstructive Vision-Language-Action Model as Effective Robot Perceiver." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNUUT2P3

@misc{pith2026250810333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ReconVLA: Reconstructive Vision-Language-Action Model as Effective Robot Perceiver},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNUUT2P3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10333}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have enabled robotic agents to integrate multimodal understanding with action execution. However, our empirical analysis reveals that current VLAs struggle to allocate visual attention to target regions. Instead, visual attention is always dispersed. To guide the visual attention grounding on the correct target, we propose ReconVLA, a reconstructive VLA model with an implicit grounding paradigm. Conditioned on the model's visual outputs, a diffusion transformer aims to reconstruct the gaze region of the image, which corresponds to the target manipulated objects. This process prompts the VLA model to learn fine-grained representations and accurately allocate visual attention, thus effectively leveraging task-specific visual information and conducting precise manipulation. Moreover, we curate a large-scale pretraining dataset comprising over 100k trajectories and 2 million data samples from open-source robotic datasets, further boosting the model's generalization in visual reconstruction. Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate the superiority of our implicit grounding method, showcasing its capabilities of precise manipulation and generalization. Our project page is https://zionchow.github.io/ReconVLA/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EndoWAM: A Grounded World-Action Model for Generalizable Endoscopic Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    EndoWAM is the first World Action Model for endoscopy: it predicts future target regions from diffusion denoising features and uses them for discrete action generation, achieving 80.2% closed-loop success across three...

  2. Towards Generalizable Robotic Manipulation in Dynamic Environments

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DOMINO supplies 110K+ dynamic dual-arm trajectories across 35 tasks, and PUMA’s optical-flow history plus object-centric future queries raise dynamic success rate by 6.3 points over strong VLA baselines.

  3. MobileWAM: Bridging World Action Models to Mobile Manipulation with Chain-of-Foresight

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MobileWAM is a world action model for mobile manipulation using layerwise video-action fusion, a locomotion/manipulation mixture-of-experts, and a training-only chained future-prediction objective.

  4. Generalizable VLA Finetuning via Representation Anchoring and Language-Action Alignment

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Preserving pretrained VLM features with layer-wise distillation plus supervising the language head on discretized action directions improves OOD generalization of VLA policies on LIBERO, CALVIN, and a real xArm7.

  5. $M^2$-VLA: Boosting Vision-Language Models for Generalizable Manipulation via Layer Mixture and Meta-Skills

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    M²-VLA shows that generalized VLMs can serve as direct backbones for robotic manipulation by selectively extracting task-critical features via Mixture of Layers and adding Meta Skill Modules for efficient trajectory learning.

  6. CorridorVLA: Explicit Spatial Constraints for Generative Action Heads via Sparse Anchors

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sparse action-aligned spatial anchors impose an explicit tolerance corridor that improves flow-matching VLA success rates by 4–12 points on LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus.

  7. TS-Mask VLA: 2D Temporal-Spatial Masking for Vision-Language-Action Model with Effective Bridging

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 0.5B VLA with bridge-conditioned discrete diffusion and 2D temporal–spatial action masking reaches 95.7% LIBERO success and 4.19 CALVIN average length.

  8. QDepth-VLA: Quantized Depth Prediction as Auxiliary Supervision for Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding an auxiliary quantized-depth-token prediction task to a VLA policy improves manipulation success rates on LIBERO, Simpler, and real-robot pick-and-place tasks versus the open-pi-zero baseline.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    W.; Ilharco, G.; Wortsman, M.; and Schmidt, L

    Awadalla, A.; Gao, I.; Gardner, J.; Hessel, J.; Hanafy, Y.; Zhu, W.; Marathe, K.; Bitton, Y.; Gadre, S.; Sagawa, S.; Jitsev, J.; Kornblith, S.; Koh, P. W.; Ilharco, G.; Wortsman, M.; and Schmidt, L. 2023. OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    S.; Kolesnikov, A.; Wang, X.; Salz, D.; Neumann, M.; Alabdulmohsin, I.; Tschannen, M.; Bugliarello, E.; et al

    Beyer, L.; Steiner, A.; Pinto, A. S.; Kolesnikov, A.; Wang, X.; Salz, D.; Neumann, M.; Alabdulmohsin, I.; Tschannen, M.; Bugliarello, E.; et al. 2024. Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07726

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    R.; Finn, C.; Kumar, A.; and Levine, S

    Black, K.; Nakamoto, M.; Atreya, P.; Walke, H. R.; Finn, C.; Kumar, A.; and Levine, S. 2024. Zero-Shot Robotic Manipulation with Pre-Trained Image-Editing Diffusion Models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Brohan, A.; Brown, N.; Carbajal, J.; Chebotar, Y.; Dabis, J.; Finn, C.; ; et al. 2023. RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Bu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Cai, J.; Gao, S.; Ren, G.; Yao, M.; Luo, P.; and Li, H. 2025. UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06111

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Bu, Q.; Zeng, J.; Chen, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Yan, J.; Luo, P.; Cui, H.; Ma, Y.; and Li, H. 2024. Closed-loop visuomotor control with generative expectation for robotic manipulation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 139002--139029

    work page 2024

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Cen, J.; Yu, C.; Yuan, H.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, S.; Guo, J.; Li, X.; Song, Y.; Luo, H.; Wang, F.; et al. 2025. WorldVLA: Towards Autoregressive Action World Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21539

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Chen, M.; Huang, K.; Zhao, T.; and Wang, M. 2023. Score Approximation, Estimation and Distribution Recovery of Diffusion Models on Low-Dimensional Data. arXiv:2302.07194

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    2016--2019

    Coumans, E.; and Bai, Y. 2016--2019. PyBullet, a Python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning. http://pybullet.org

    2016

  4. [12]

    Cui, C.; Ding, P.; Song, W.; Bai, S.; Tong, X.; Ge, Z.; Suo, R.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Jia, B.; et al. 2025. OpenHelix: A Short Survey, Empirical Analysis, and Open-Source Dual-System VLA Model for Robotic Manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03912

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Deng, S.; Yan, M.; Wei, S.; Ma, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, X.; Cui, H.; et al. 2025. Graspvla: a grasping foundation model pre-trained on billion-scale synthetic action data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03233

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ding, P.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, W.; Song, W.; Zhang, M.; Huang, S.; Yang, N.; and Wang, D. 2024. Quar-vla: Vision-language-action model for quadruped robots. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 352--367. Springer

    2024

  7. [15]

    Du, Y.; Yang, S.; Dai, B.; Dai, H.; Nachum, O.; Tenenbaum, J.; Schuurmans, D.; and Abbeel, P. 2023. Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36: 9156--9172

    2023

  8. [16]

    Fang, H.-S.; Fang, H.; Tang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; and Lu, C. 2024. Rh20t: A comprehensive robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 653--660. IEEE

    2024

  9. [17]

    Guo, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.-J.; Chen, X.; Lu, C.; and Chen, J. 2024. Prediction with Action: Visual Policy Learning via Joint Denoising Process. arXiv:2411.18179

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    He, K.; Chen, X.; Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Doll \'a r, P.; and Girshick, R. 2022. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 16000--16009

    2022

  11. [19]

    Ho, J.; Jain, A.; and Abbeel, P. 2020. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. arXiv:2006.11239

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Huang, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Han, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, T.; Pang, J.; and Zhao, Z. 2025. RoboGround: Robotic Manipulation with Grounded Vision-Language Priors. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR), 22540--22550

    2025

  13. [21]

    Karras, T.; Aittala, M.; Aila, T.; and Laine, S. 2022. Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models. arXiv:2206.00364

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Khanam, R.; and Hussain, M. 2024. Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J.; Pertsch, K.; Karamcheti, S.; Xiao, T.; Balakrishna, A.; Nair, S.; Rafailov, R.; Foster, E

    Kim, M. J.; Pertsch, K.; Karamcheti, S.; Xiao, T.; Balakrishna, A.; Nair, S.; Rafailov, R.; Foster, E. P.; Sanketi, P. R.; Vuong, Q.; et al. 2024. OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model. In 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

    2024

  16. [24]

    P.; and Welling, M

    Kingma, D. P.; and Welling, M. 2022. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv:1312.6114

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lai, X.; Tian, Z.; Chen, Y.; et al. 2024. LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Model. arXiv:2308.00692

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Li, X.; Liu, M.; Zhang, H.; Yu, C.; Xu, J.; Wu, H.; Cheang, C.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; et al. 2024. Vision-Language Foundation Models as Effective Robot Imitators. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations

    2024

  19. [27]

    Li, Z.; Ren, L.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, Z.; Bai, X.; and Zhao, H. 2025. VIP: Vision Instructed Pre-training for Robotic Manipulation. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning

    2025

  20. [28]

    Liu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, C.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; and Stone, P. 2024 a . Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36

    2024

  21. [29]

    Liu, H.; Li, C.; Wu, Q.; and Lee, Y. J. 2024 b . Visual instruction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36

    2024

  22. [30]

    Liu, S.; Zeng, Z.; Ren, T.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Q.; Li, C.; Yang, J.; Su, H.; et al. 2024 c . Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. In European conference on computer vision, 38--55. Springer

    2024

  23. [31]

    Lu, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, B.; Wang, B.; Dong, K.; Liu, B.; Sun, J.; Ren, T.; Li, Z.; Yang, H.; et al. 2024. Deepseek-vl: towards real-world vision-language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05525

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mees, O.; Hermann, L.; Rosete-Beas, E.; and Burgard, W. 2021. CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    2021

  25. [33]

    Niu, D.; Sharma, Y.; Biamby, G.; Quenum, J.; Bai, Y.; Shi, B.; Darrell, T.; and Herzig, R. 2024. LLARVA: Vision-Action Instruction Tuning Enhances Robot Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11815

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Y.; Sanketi, P.; Vuong, Q.; Xiao, T.; Sadigh, D.; Finn, C.; and Levine, S

    Octo Model Team ; Ghosh, D.; Walke, H.; Pertsch, K.; Black, K.; Mees, O.; Dasari, S.; Hejna, J.; Xu, C.; Luo, J.; Kreiman, T.; Tan, Y.; Chen, L. Y.; Sanketi, P.; Vuong, Q.; Xiao, T.; Sadigh, D.; Finn, C.; and Levine, S. 2024. Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy. In Pr...

    2024

  27. [35]

    O’Neill, A.; Rehman, A.; Maddukuri, A.; Gupta, A.; Padalkar, A.; Lee, A.; Pooley, A.; Gupta, A.; Mandlekar, A.; Jain, A.; et al. 2024. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robo...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Peebles, W.; and Xie, S. 2022. Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Rombach, R.; Blattmann, A.; Lorenz, D.; Esser, P.; and Ommer, B. 2022. High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. arXiv:2112.10752

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Song, W.; Chen, J.; Ding, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, D.; and Li, H. 2025 a . CEED-VLA: Consistency Vision-Language-Action Model with Early-Exit Decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13725

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Song, W.; Chen, J.; Ding, P.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhong, Z.; Ge, Z.; Ma, J.; and Li, H. 2025 b . Accelerating Vision-Language-Action Model Integrated with Action Chunking via Parallel Decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02310

    2025

  32. [40]

    Song, W.; Chen, J.; Li, W.; He, X.; Zhao, H.; Cui, C.; Su, P. D. S.; Tang, F.; Cheng, X.; Wang, D.; et al. 2025 c . Rationalvla: A rational vision-language-action model with dual system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10826

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Song, W.; Zhao, H.; Ding, P.; Cui, C.; Lyu, S.; Fan, Y.; and Wang, D. 2024. Germ: A generalist robotic model with mixture-of-experts for quadruped robot. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 11879--11886. IEEE

    2024

  34. [42]

    Song, Y.; and Ermon, S. 2020. Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution. arXiv:1907.05600

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Stewart, E. E. M. e. a. 2020. A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision. Journal of Vision, 20(12): 2--2

    2020

  36. [44]

    Tian, Y.; Yang, S.; Zeng, J.; Wang, P.; Lin, D.; Dong, H.; and Pang, J. 2024. Predictive inverse dynamics models are scalable learners for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15109

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Tong, X.; Ding, P.; Fan, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Cui, C.; Sun, M.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, H.; Dang, Y.; Huang, S.; and Lyu, S. 2025. QUART-Online: Latency-Free Large Multimodal Language Model for Quadruped Robot Learning. arXiv:2412.15576

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Vaswani, A. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2017

  39. [47]

    J.; Du, M.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, T.; Hansen-Estruch, P.; Vuong, Q.; He, A.; Myers, V.; Fang, K.; Finn, C.; and Levine, S

    Walke, H.; Black, K.; Lee, A.; Kim, M. J.; Du, M.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, T.; Hansen-Estruch, P.; Vuong, Q.; He, A.; Myers, V.; Fang, K.; Finn, C.; and Levine, S. 2024. BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scale. arXiv:2308.12952

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R.; Black, K.; Zhao, T

    Walke, H. R.; Black, K.; Zhao, T. Z.; Vuong, Q.; Zheng, C.; Hansen-Estruch, P.; He, A. W.; Myers, V.; Kim, M. J.; Du, M.; et al. 2023. Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale. In Conference on Robot Learning, 1723--1736. PMLR

    2023

  41. [49]

    Wang, H.; Zheng, A.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, T.; Ge, Z.; Zhang, X.; and Zhang, Z. 2024. Reconstructive Visual Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2410.09575

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; and Zhang, Z. 2025. Unified Vision-Language-Action Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19850

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Wen, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhu, Y.; Han, J.; Xu, H.; Zhao, S.; and Liang, X. 2024. Vidman: Exploiting implicit dynamics from video diffusion model for effective robot manipulation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 41051--41075

    2024

  44. [52]

    Wu, H.; Jing, Y.; Cheang, C.; Chen, G.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Liu, M.; Li, H.; and Kong, T. 2024. Unleashing Large-Scale Video Generative Pre-training for Visual Robot Manipulation. ICLR

    2024

  45. [53]

    Yang, A.; Yang, B.; Hui, B.; Zheng, B.; Yu, B.; Zhou, C.; Li, C.; Li, C.; Liu, D.; Huang, F.; Dong, G.; Wei, H.; Lin, H.; Tang, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Tu, J.; Zhang, J.; Ma, J.; Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Zhou, J.; Bai, J.; He, J.; Lin, J.; Dang, K.; Lu, K.; Chen, K.; Yang, K.; Li, M....

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Yang, R.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, B.; and Li, S. 2024 b . The Convergence of Variance Exploding Diffusion Models under the Manifold Hypothesis

    2024

  47. [55]

    Zawalski, M.; Chen, W.; Pertsch, K.; Mees, O.; Finn, C.; and Levine, S. 2024. Robotic control via embodied chain-of-thought reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08693

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Zhai, X.; Mustafa, B.; Kolesnikov, A.; and Beyer, L. 2023. Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training. arXiv:2303.15343

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Zhang, H.; Ding, P.; Lyu, S.; Peng, Y.; and Wang, D. 2025. GEVRM: Goal-Expressive Video Generation Model For Robust Visual Manipulation. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    2025

  50. [58]

    Zhao, H.; Song, W.; Wang, D.; Tong, X.; Ding, P.; Cheng, X.; and Ge, Z. 2025 a . MoRE: Unlocking Scalability in Reinforcement Learning for Quadruped Vision-Language-Action Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08007

    2025 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Zhao, W.; Ding, P.; Zhang, M.; Gong, Z.; Bai, S.; Zhao, H.; and Wang, D. 2025 b . VLAS: Vision-Language-Action Model With Speech Instructions For Customized Robot Manipulation. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Zhen, H.; Qiu, X.; Chen, P.; Yang, J.; Yan, X.; Du, Y.; Hong, Y.; and Gan, C. 2024. 3D-VLA: A 3D Vision-Language-Action Generative World Model. In ICML

    2024

  53. [61]

    Zitkovich, B.; Yu, T.; Xu, S.; Xu, P.; Xiao, T.; Xia, F.; Wu, J.; Wohlhart, P.; Welker, S.; Wahid, A.; et al. 2023. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In Conference on Robot Learning, 2165--2183. PMLR

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.