Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 7 cited by

UI-Venus Technical Report: Building High-performance UI Agents with RFT

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A screenshot-only UI agent reaches state-of-the-art scores on UI grounding and navigation by using reinforcement finetuning on a few hundred thousand high-quality samples.

desk verdict The abstract describes a plausible UI agent, but the full text is an unrelated superconductivity paper—so the manuscript as submitted cannot be evaluated. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10833 v2 pith:RAW7ZG5Q submitted 2025-08-14 cs.CV

Zhangxuan Gu , Zhengwen Zeng , Zhenyu Xu , Xingran Zhou , Shuheng Shen , Yunfei Liu , Beitong Zhou , Changhua Meng
show 16 more authors
Tianyu Xia Weizhi Chen Yue Wen Jingya Dou Fei Tang Jinzhen Lin Yulin Liu Zhenlin Guo Yichen Gong Heng Jia Changlong Gao Yuan Guo Yong Deng Zhenyu Guo Liang Chen Weiqiang Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords UIagentreinforcementfinetuning(RFT)screenshot-onlygroundingnavigationQwen2.5-VLrewarddesigntrajectoryalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a UI agent which sees only screenshots, built on the Qwen2.5-VL multimodal model, can reach state-of-the-art performance on both UI grounding and navigation through reinforcement finetuning on a few hundred thousand high-quality samples. The 72B variant scores 95.3% on Screenspot-V2 grounding and 65.9% success on AndroidWorld navigation, beating the open-source GTA1 and the closed-source UI-TARS-1.5 baselines. If the benchmark conditions hold, this matters because it suggests that carefully designed reward functions plus reinforcement learning can substitute for much larger data collection in building functional UI agents. The paper also introduces a self-evolving trajectory history alignment and sparse action enhancement mechanism to make navigation planning more coherent.

What carries the argument

Reinforcement finetuning (RFT) with task-specific reward functions is the core training mechanism, and the navigation-side innovation is Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment & Sparse Action Enhancement: the model refines its own past reasoning traces and up-weights rare but decisive actions so that planning becomes more coherent and sparse actions are not under-trained.

What would settle it

Re-run UI-Venus and its baselines on AndroidWorld using the same episode start seeds, step budget, and screenshot rendering; if the 65.9% success rate for the 72B model does not reproduce within a few points, or if UI-TARS-1.5 or GTA1 scores higher under matched conditions, the SOTA claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

UI-Venus is a native screenshot-only UI agent trained by reinforcement finetuning (RFT) from the Qwen2.5-VL base model. Its central claim is that RFT with carefully designed reward functions—one set for grounding, another for navigation—plus efficient data cleaning yields state-of-the-art performance with only several hundred thousand training samples. On the standard grounding benchmarks Screenspot-V2 and Screenspot-Pro, the 7B and 72B variants reach 94.1%/50.8% and 95.3%/61.9%, respectively; on the online AndroidWorld arena they reach 49.1% and 65.9% success. These numbers surpass the open-source GTA1 and closed-source UI-TARS-1.5. The paper additionally proposes Self-Evolving Trajectory H

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark numbers are computed under evaluation conditions identical to the baseline models, with run-to-run stability, so that the reported deltas reflect genuine capability rather than evaluation setup.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Screenshot-only agents can match or beat agents that use accessibility trees or larger proprietary training runs, if reward design is right.
  • RFT on a few hundred thousand samples may replace million-scale datasets for UI tasks.
  • The self-evolving trajectory alignment could transfer to other sequential decision-making domains where sparse actions decide outcomes.
  • Open-source UI agents become competitive with closed-source ones, lowering the barrier for deployment.
  • The data cleaning protocols could become a reusable resource for the community.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reward functions are the real driver, similar gains might appear in other multimodal agent tasks such as web navigation or desktop automation, although the paper only tests UI benchmarks.
  • The sparse action enhancement suggests a general principle: sequence models under-train rare but high-impact actions, and explicit rebalancing may matter more than raw data volume.
  • The lack of error bars or protocol details means the SOTA margin could shrink under standardized re-evaluation; a direct head-to-head with UI-TARS-1.5 under identical settings would clarify the claim.
  • The much lower scores on Screenspot-Pro hint that harder benchmarks remain a challenge; whether RFT continues to scale or plateaus is left open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission presents an abstract claiming UI-Venus, a screenshot-only UI agent built on Qwen2.5-VL and trained with reinforcement finetuning (RFT), achieves state-of-the-art performance on UI grounding (Screenspot-V2/Pro) and navigation (AndroidWorld). The abstract reports point estimates for 7B and 72B variants, and introduces techniques called Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment and Sparse Action Enhancement. However, the supplied full text is a condensed-matter physics paper titled "Field-free superconducting diode effect in two-dimensional Shiba lattices" (arXiv:2508.10832v1). The body contains no mention of UI agents, Qwen2.5-VL, Screenspot, AndroidWorld, RFT, reward functions, data cleaning, or any of the claimed methods. The manuscript as submitted is therefore internally inconsistent: the central technical claims exist only in the abstract and are entirely unsupported by the accompanying text.

Significance. If correct, UI-Venus would be a significant contribution to the field of GUI agents: an open-source, screenshot-only 7B/72B model family achieving SOTA on standard grounding and online navigation benchmarks, with sample-efficient RFT training and novel trajectory-alignment techniques. The claimed numbers would be useful for the community. However, the manuscript as provided gives no verifiable evidence. The full text does not describe the system, the training data, the reward functions, the evaluation protocol, or the baselines. Because none of the central claims can be checked, the significance is entirely conditional and cannot be assessed from this submission.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text vs. Abstract] The supplied full text is an unrelated condensed-matter paper on the field-free superconducting diode effect in Shiba lattices (arXiv:2508.10832v1). It contains no occurrence of UI-Venus, Qwen2.5-VL, Screenspot-V2/Pro, AndroidWorld, RFT, reward functions, data cleaning, Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment, or Sparse Action Enhancement. Every technical assertion in the abstract is therefore unsupported by the manuscript body. This is a load-bearing failure: the central claim of SOTA UI agent performance cannot be checked in any way. If this is a submission/pipeline error, the correct manuscript must be provided; in its current form, the submission is not a coherent paper.
  2. [Abstract benchmark claims] Even taking the abstract on its own terms, the reported benchmark numbers (94.1%/50.8% and 95.3%/61.9% on Screenspot-V2/Pro; 49.1%/65.9% on AndroidWorld) are unreferenced point estimates. No evaluation protocol is given: no baseline configurations, no evaluation harness, no number of runs or error bars, no definition of the AndroidWorld success metric, and no base-model ablations. Without these, claims of 'surpassing GTA1 and UI-TARS-1.5' are not interpretable. A revision would need to include a full experimental section.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Typos and infelicities: 'summary and planing ability' should be 'summarization and planning ability'; 'the publish of SOTA open-source UI agents' should be 'the release of SOTA open-source UI agents'.
  2. [Abstract references] The benchmarks (Screenspot-V2, Screenspot-Pro, AndroidWorld) and baselines (GTA1, UI-TARS-1.5) are named without citations. If the correct manuscript is supplied, it should include proper references and, ideally, links to the leaderboards or evaluation code used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the supplied full text is an unrelated cond-mat paper and contains no UI-Venus derivation chain to inspect.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain for UI-Venus (RFT on Qwen2.5-VL, reward design, data cleaning, Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment & Sparse Action Enhancement) is only described at the level of the abstract. The full text supplied is arXiv:2508.10832v1, a condensed-matter paper on the field-free superconducting diode effect in two-dimensional Shiba lattices, and it contains no mention of UI agents, Qwen2.5-VL, Screenspot-V2/Pro, AndroidWorld, RFT, reward functions, or any equations from which the reported benchmark numbers could be derived. Consequently, there is no derivation chain to walk, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation is invoked to justify a load-bearing claim. The abstract's performance numbers cannot be reduced to inputs by construction because the supporting methods and equations are absent from the supplied text. This is a serious manuscript-integrity or pipeline-mismatch issue, not a circularity issue. Under the hard rule that circularity must be exhibited by quoting specific equations or reductions, no circular step can be identified. The correct circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

These are the implicit ingredients of the claims. Values and statistical details are absent because the review is based on the abstract only.

free parameters (3)
  • RFT hyperparameters (learning rate, KL coefficient, etc.)
    Abstract does not report values; these determine the trained model but are not stated.
  • Reward function weights for grounding and navigation
    Reward design is central to the claimed gains; no specifics are given in the abstract.
  • Data cleaning thresholds
    The 'high quality' training set size is given as several hundred thousand, but the cleaning criteria are not specified.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Screenspot-V2/Pro and AndroidWorld are valid proxies for real-world UI agent performance
    The SOTA claim is defined entirely by these benchmarks; no external validation is offered in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Qwen2.5-VL is an appropriate base model and the backbone choice does not drive the results
    The abstract builds on Qwen2.5-VL without ablation against other backbones.
  • domain assumption The self-evolving trajectory history alignment improves generalization, not just in-distribution score
    The abstract states it 'leads to more coherent planning and better generalization', but no evidence is visible in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment
    purpose: Refine historical reasoning traces to improve planning coherence
    New named mechanism in the abstract; no independent validation is shown outside the reported benchmarks.
  • Sparse Action Enhancement
    purpose: Balance the distribution of sparse but critical actions during navigation
    New named mechanism in the abstract; no independent evidence in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UI-Venus Technical Report: Building High-performance UI Agents with RFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RAW7ZG5Q

@misc{pith2026250810833,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UI-Venus Technical Report: Building High-performance UI Agents with RFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RAW7ZG5Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10833}
}
read the original abstract

We present UI-Venus, a native UI agent that takes only screenshots as input based on a multimodal large language model. UI-Venus achieves SOTA performance on both UI grounding and navigation tasks using only several hundred thousand high-quality training samples through reinforcement finetune (RFT) based on Qwen2.5-VL. Specifically, the 7B and 72B variants of UI-Venus obtain 94.1% / 50.8% and 95.3% / 61.9% on the standard grounding benchmarks, i.e., Screenspot-V2 / Pro, surpassing the previous SOTA baselines including open-source GTA1 and closed-source UI-TARS-1.5. To show UI-Venus's summary and planing ability, we also evaluate it on the AndroidWorld, an online UI navigation arena, on which our 7B and 72B variants achieve 49.1% and 65.9% success rate, also beating existing models. To achieve this, we introduce carefully designed reward functions for both UI grounding and navigation tasks and corresponding efficient data cleaning strategies. To further boost navigation performance, we propose Self-Evolving Trajectory History Alignment & Sparse Action Enhancement that refine historical reasoning traces and balances the distribution of sparse but critical actions, leading to more coherent planning and better generalization in complex UI tasks. Our contributions include the publish of SOTA open-source UI agents, comprehensive data cleaning protocols and a novel self-evolving framework for improving navigation performance, which encourage further research and development in the community. Code is available at https://github.com/inclusionAI/UI-Venus.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Next Screenshot Knows: Gated Hindsight Distillation for Mobile GUI Agents

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gated Hindsight Distillation uses the next screenshot from a successful trajectory as privileged teacher information that corrects a student GUI agent's failed rollouts, improving Android task success over GRPO baselines.

  2. AppDeltaWorld: Transition-Grounded Delta Code World Model for Mobile GUI Agents

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AppDeltaWorld predicts mobile GUI transitions as code updates retrieved under action constraints, and its generated trajectories improve an 8B mobile agent on several benchmarks.

  3. GUI-Lens: Coarse-to-Fine Cropping for GUI Grounding with General-Purpose VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GUI-Lens improves GUI grounding by having a VLM iteratively select crops to zoom into, guided by OCR and UI detector references, and verifies its proposed clicks before outputting a coordinate.

  4. MAGA: Multi-Platform Self-Fusion of GUI Agents via Structured Action Distillation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAGA distills three domain-specific GUI agents into one student by amplifying supervision on wrongly generated action tokens and feeding the teacher a training-only hint of the correct action type, improving mean succ...

  5. Scaling GUI Agents with Visual State Transitions

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A joint inverse-forward pretraining stage on visual screen transitions improves GUI-agent fine-tuning by 0.6–6.2 percentage points across three benchmarks.

  6. GUI-Libra: Training Native GUI Agents to Reason and Act with Action-aware Supervision and Partially Verifiable RL

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Action-weighted SFT plus KL-regularized GRPO on a curated 81K reasoning dataset lifts open-source GUI agents by 11–22 points on online task-completion benchmarks.

  7. Qwen-UI-Agent Technical Report: Toward Next-Generation Real-World Centric Foundation GUI Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A real-device-centric foundation GUI agent with hybrid GUI+CLI batched actions, AutoResearch data flywheel, online RL, and a proactive harness reaches SOTA mobile and competitive desktop/web scores.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [20]

    J. J. Cuozzo, W. Pan, J. Shabani, and E. Rossi, Microwave-tunable diode effect in asymmetric squids with topological josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [21]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267702 (2022)

    2022

  3. [22]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Josephson diode based on con- ventional superconductors and a chiral quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184511 (2023)

    2023

  4. [23]

    J. F. Steiner, L. Melischek, M. Trahms, K. J. Franke, and F. von Oppen, Diode effects in current-biased josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 177002 (2023)

    2023

  5. [24]

    Costa, J

    A. Costa, J. Fabian, and D. Kochan, Microscopic study of the josephson supercurrent diode effect in josephson junctions based on two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054522 (2023)

    2023

  6. [25]

    Wei, H.-L

    Y.-J. Wei, H.-L. Liu, J. Wang, and J.-F. Liu, Supercur- rent rectification effect in graphene-based josephson junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165419 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [26]

    Daido and Y

    A. Daido and Y. Yanase, Superconducting diode effect and nonreciprocal transition lines, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205206 (2022)

    2022

  8. [27]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

Show all 41 references
  1. [28]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  2. [29]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  3. [30]

    Ili´ c and F

    S. Ili´ c and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary dis- order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  4. [31]

    H. D. Scammell, J. I. A. Li, and M. S. Scheurer, Theory of zero-field superconducting diode effect in twisted trilayer graphene, 2D Materials 9, 025027 (2022)

    2022

  5. [32]

    Zinkl, K

    B. Zinkl, K. Hamamoto, and M. Sigrist, Symmetry con- ditions for the superconducting diode effect in chiral su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033167 (2022)

    2022

  6. [33]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, The supercurrent diode effect and nonreciprocal paraconductivity due to the chiral structure of nanotubes, Nature Communica- tions 14, 3330 (2023)

    2023

  7. [34]

    B. Zhai, B. Li, Y. Wen, F. Wu, and J. He, Prediction of ferroelectric superconductors with reversible supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140505 (2022)

    2022

  8. [35]

    Jiang, M

    J. Jiang, M. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Y.-L. Wang, Z.-L. Xiao, F. Peeters, and Q.-H. Chen, Field-free superconducting diode in a magnetically nanostructured superconductor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034064 (2022)

    2022

  9. [36]

    de Picoli, Z

    T. de Picoli, Z. Blood, Y. Lyanda-Geller, and J. I. V¨ ayrynen, Superconducting diode effect in quasi-one- dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224518 (2023)

    2023

  10. [37]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Superconducting diode effect due to magnetochiral anisotropy in topolog- ical insulators and rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 106, 104501 (2022)

    2022

  11. [38]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Enhanced superconduct- ing diode effect due to coexisting phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046003 (2024)

    2024

  12. [39]

    Bhowmik, D

    S. Bhowmik, D. Samanta, A. K. Nandy, A. Saha, and S. K. Ghosh, Optimizing one dimensional superconduct- ing diodes: interplay of rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields, Communications Physics 8, 260 (2025)

    2025

  13. [40]

    Samanta and S

    D. Samanta and S. K. Ghosh, Field-free supercon- ducting diode effect and topological fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov superconductivity in altermagnetic shiba chains, arXiv:2507.21446 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  14. [41]

    Y. Hou, F. Nichele, H. Chi, A. Lodesani, Y. Wu, M. F. Ritter, D. Z. Haxell, M. Davydova, S. Ili´ c, O. Glezakou- Elbert, A. Varambally, F. S. Bergeret, A. Kamra, L. Fu, P. A. Lee, and J. S. Moodera, Ubiquitous superconduct- ing diode effect in superconductor thin films, Phys. ...

    2023

  15. [42]

    Gupta, G

    M. Gupta, G. V. Graziano, M. Pendharkar, J. T. Dong, C. P. Dempsey, C. Palmstrøm, and V. S. Prib- iag, Gate-tunable superconducting diode effect in a three- terminal josephson device, Nature communications 14, 3078 (2023)

    2023

  16. [43]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. Geier, M. A. Rahman, C. Thomas, T. Wang, M. J. Manfra, K. Flensberg, and C. M. Marcus, Phase asymmetry of andreev spectra from cooper-pair momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 196301 (2023)

    2023

  17. [44]

    Narita, J

    H. Narita, J. Ishizuka, R. Kawarazaki, D. Kan, Y. Sh- iota, T. Moriyama, Y. Shimakawa, A. V. Ognev, A. S. Samardak, Y. Yanase, et al., Field-free superconduct- ing diode effect in noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor/ferromagnet multilayers, Nature Nanotechnology 17, 823 (2022)

    2022

  18. [45]

    Gutfreund, H

    A. Gutfreund, H. Matsuki, V. Plastovets, A. Noah, L. Gorzawski, N. Fridman, G. Yang, A. Buzdin, O. Millo, J. W. Robinson, et al., Direct observation of a supercon- ducting vortex diode, Nature Communications 14, 1630 (2023)

    2023

  19. [46]

    Y. Chen, M. S. Scheurer, and C. Schrade, Intrinsic su- perconducting diode effect and nonreciprocal supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral graphene multilayers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16391 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  20. [47]

    T.-P. Choy, J. M. Edge, A. R. Akhmerov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Majorana fermions emerging from magnetic nanoparticles on a superconductor without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195442 (2011)

    2011

  21. [48]

    Nadj-Perge, I

    S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Proposal for realizing majorana fermions in chains of magnetic atoms on a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 88, 020407 (2013)

    2013

  22. [49]

    Pientka, L

    F. Pientka, L. I. Glazman, and F. von Oppen, Topological superconducting phase in helical shiba chains, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155420 (2013)

    2013

  23. [50]

    M. M. Vazifeh and M. Franz, Self-organized topologi- cal state with majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 206802 (2013)

    2013

  24. [51]

    Heimes, P

    A. Heimes, P. Kotetes, and G. Sch¨ on, Majorana fermions from shiba states in an antiferromagnetic chain on top of a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 90, 060507 (2014)

    2014

  25. [52]

    Bhowmik and A

    S. Bhowmik and A. Saha, Topological majorana zero modes and the superconducting diode effect driven by fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov pairing in a helical shiba chain, Phys. Rev. B 111, L161402 (2025)

    2025

  26. [53]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  27. [54]

    Larkin and Y

    A. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Soviet Physics-JETP 20, 762 (1965)

    1965

  28. [55]

    Lo Conte, J

    R. Lo Conte, J. Wiebe, S. Rachel, D. K. Morr, and R. Wiesendanger, Magnet-superconductor hybrid quan- tum systems: a materials platform for topological super- 9 conductivity, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento , 1 (2025)

    2025

  29. [56]

    R. Hess, H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Preva- lence of trivial zero-energy subgap states in nonuniform helical spin chains on the surface of superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 106, 104503 (2022)

    2022

  30. [57]

    Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes method and its applica- tions, Vol

    J.-X. Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes method and its applica- tions, Vol. 924 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  31. [58]

    Br¨ uning, J

    R. Br¨ uning, J. Bedow, R. L. Conte, K. von Bergmann, D. Morr, R. Wiesendanger, et al., The non-collinear path to topological superconductivity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14673 (2024)

    2024

  32. [59]

    R´ ozsa, L

    L. R´ ozsa, L. Udvardi, L. Szunyogh, and I. A. Szab´ o, Mag- netic phase diagram of an fe monolayer on w(110) and ta(110) surfaces based on ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144424 (2015)

    2015

  33. [60]

    Chatterjee, S

    P. Chatterjee, S. Banik, S. Bera, A. K. Ghosh, S. Prad- han, A. Saha, and A. K. Nandy, Topological supercon- ductivity by engineering noncollinear magnetism in mag- net/superconductor heterostructures: A realistic pre- scription for the two-dimensional kitaev model, Phys. Rev....

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.