Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

A High Performance GPU CountSketch Implementation and Its Application to Multisketching and Least Squares Problems

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A GPU CountSketch makes multisketched least squares up to 77% faster than normal equations, with better numerical stability.

desk verdict The abstract promises a GPU CountSketch least-squares solver, but the uploaded manuscript is an unrelated nuclear-physics paper—nothing about the advertised work is present to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14209 v1 pith:IXVSU43I submitted 2025-08-19 math.NA cs.DCcs.NAcs.PF

Andrew J. Higgins , Erik G. Boman , Ichitaro Yamazaki This is my paper
classification math.NAcs.DCcs.NAcs.PF MSC 65F2068W20
keywords CountSketchGPUrandomsketchingmultisketchingleastsquaresnormalequationsnumericalstabilityrandomizedlinearalgebra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Random sketching reduces the dimension of a matrix while approximately preserving norms and singular values, and the CountSketch does this at lower cost than Gaussian or Hadamard sketches. This paper argues that CountSketch can be implemented efficiently on GPUs and that using it as the first stage of a two-sketch 'multisketching' pipeline makes the whole approach practical. Inside a least squares solver, the multisketched method is claimed to run up to 77% faster than the normal equations while being significantly more numerically stable. The trade-off is an O(1) multiplicative factor in the relative residual norm. If these claims hold, randomized sketching becomes a serious competitor to classical factorizations for large least squares problems on GPU hardware.

What carries the argument

CountSketch: a sparse random projection that hashes each column to one row and flips its sign, so applying it costs linear time in the number of nonzeros, unlike Gaussian or subsampled randomized Hadamard transforms. The paper's load-bearing mechanism is a GPU-tuned CountSketch kernel used as the first, cheap stage of a multisketching pipeline (CountSketch followed by Gaussian sketch); the reported speedup and stability gains of the least squares solver come from this fast pre-reduction.

What would settle it

Run an independent benchmark that compares the multisketched GPU least squares solver against a well-optimized normal-equations solver on the same GPU, across a range of sparse and dense problem sizes, and check whether the ≈77% speedup and the improved numerical stability reproduce, and whether the relative-residual inflation stays O(1) as the condition number and problem size grow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the CountSketch—a sparse random projection in which each column is hashed to a single row and multiplied by a random sign, giving O(nnz) computation—can be turned into a high-performance GPU routine, and that this routine makes multisketching a cheap and fast way to reduce matrix dimension. Combining that CountSketch with a Gaussian sketch produces a multisketched least squares solver that the paper reports as up to 77% faster than solving the normal equations, with significantly better numerical stability and only a constant-factor inflation of the relative residual norm.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reported 77% speedup and stability improvement were measured against a fairly optimized and representative normal-equations baseline; the abstract gives no details on hardware, matrix dimensions, or baselines, so if that comparison was unoptimized or the test problems too small, the headline result would not generalize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CountSketch is no longer just a theoretical construction: it can be engineered into a fast GPU kernel.
  • Multisketching becomes a practical cheap pre-reduction strategy because the first reduction is done with the low-cost CountSketch, shrinking the matrix before the more expensive Gaussian sketch is applied.
  • A least squares solve can be dramatically faster than the normal equations while being numerically more stable, because the sketch preconditions the problem.
  • The price of this speed is a bounded O(1) multiplicative factor in the relative residual norm, an acceptable trade for many large-scale problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the GPU CountSketch is released as a reusable routine, it could directly accelerate other randomized linear algebra workloads—low-rank approximation, subspace iteration, and streaming regression—that currently rely on Gaussian or Hadamard sketches.
  • The reported 77% figure is probably problem-size dependent: below some crossover dimension the sketching overhead plus residual distortion will make normal equations more attractive, and the abstract does not locate that crossover.
  • Because CountSketch updates in one pass over nonzeros, the same kernel should extend naturally to out-of-core or streaming settings where the matrix never fits in GPU memory.
  • The O(1) residual inflation could be tightened by replacing the second sketch with a subspace-embedding transform of better distortion at the price of some of the speedup.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission advertises a high-performance GPU implementation of the CountSketch, a multisketching construction combining CountSketch with a Gaussian sketch, and a multisketched least-squares solver claimed to be up to 77% faster than the normal equations with better numerical stability. The abstract presents this as the paper's contribution. However, the full text supplied is an entirely different manuscript: arXiv:2508.14217v2 [nucl-th], 'Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations' by Bonaiti, Hagen, and Papenbrock. That text contains no CountSketch algorithm, no GPU implementation, no multisketching construction, no least-squares experiments, no baselines, no benchmark tables, and no hardware details. None of the abstract's mathematical or experimental claims appear anywhere in the body. The submitted manuscript therefore provides no support for any of its stated contributions.

Significance. If the advertised results were present and correct, the work could be of interest to the numerical linear algebra and randomized sketching communities: a tuned GPU CountSketch and a demonstration of multisketching for least-squares with a reported 77% speedup over normal equations would be a useful engineering contribution, provided the derivation and benchmarks were supplied. However, as submitted, the manuscript contains none of these elements. There is no derivation of the sketch-size choices, no distortion analysis, no benchmark methodology, and no code or data. The only substantive content is an unrelated nuclear-structure paper. Consequently, the claimed significance cannot be assessed, and the manuscript in its current form is unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire manuscript)] The body of the submitted manuscript is the text of arXiv:2508.14217 [nucl-th], 'Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations' by Bonaiti, Hagen, and Papenbrock. It contains no material related to the abstract's claims about GPU CountSketch, multisketching, or least-squares solvers. There is no algorithm, no pseudocode, no GPU kernel description, no complexity analysis, and no numerical experiments. This is not a missing detail or an incomplete derivation; the central content of the advertised paper is absent.
  2. [Abstract compared to body] The abstract asserts a 77% speedup over normal equations and 'significantly better numerical stability' with an O(1) residual distortion factor. The body provides no definition of the CountSketch, no hash-function construction, no embedding dimension, no baseline normal-equations implementation, no matrix sizes, no hardware information, and no residual or timing measurements. The claim is thus entirely unsupported by any evidence in the submitted text.
  3. [Sections I–Supplemental Material] All numbered sections, equations (e.g., Eq. (1) for the nuclear Hamiltonian), figures (Figs. 1–8), and tables (Tables I–II) concern nuclear structure and coupled-cluster computations. None of these are referenced by or connected to the abstract's topic. A reader cannot check the multisketching distortion factors, the CountSketch GPU implementation, or the least-squares solver because none of these are described.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title/arXiv metadata] The advertised title and the manuscript body correspond to two different arXiv identifiers (2508.14209 vs. 2508.14217). This is likely a submission or packaging error, but as presented it makes the manuscript internally inconsistent.
  2. [References] The reference list is entirely from the nuclear-structure literature and contains no citations to randomized sketching, CountSketch, or GPU linear algebra. This further confirms that the body is unrelated to the abstract's topic.
  3. [Throughout] The typesetting of several formulas is corrupted (e.g., '��' for 'ab initio' and missing math). While this could be a rendering artifact, it compounds the difficulty of interpreting the supplied text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable: the supplied full text is a different (nuclear-physics) paper; the CountSketch derivation chain is absent, so no claim reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The manuscript's abstract announces a GPU CountSketch implementation, multisketching, and a least-squares speedup, but the supplied full text (arXiv:2508.14217v2 [nucl-th]) is entitled 'Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations' and contains no CountSketch equations, no GPU implementation, no benchmark tables, and no least-squares experiments. There is therefore no claimed derivation chain to walk: no sketch-size parameter is fitted to a target quantity and then called a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The absence of supporting text is a completeness/verification problem, not circularity under the stated definitions. Since the review rules permit flagging circularity only when a specific reduction (Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as prediction) can be quoted from the paper, and no such reduction exists in the supplied text, the honest finding is no significant circularity with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is based on the abstract alone because the supplied full text is an unrelated paper. The main free parameter is the sketch size, which controls the accuracy/runtime tradeoff. The core axiom is the subspace-preservation guarantee of the composite sketch, which is assumed rather than derived in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • Sketch size (embedding dimension m)
    The abstract does not state the sketch dimensions used; the residual distortion and runtime both depend on this choice.
  • Number of CountSketch hash functions / rows
    Typical for CountSketch; abstract does not specify.
assumptions (2)
  • standard math CountSketch and Gaussian sketches approximately preserve Euclidean norms and singular values with high probability
    Stated in the abstract as the basis of dimensionality reduction.
  • domain assumption Combining CountSketch and Gaussian sketch (multisketching) preserves the subspace information needed for least squares
    The abstract asserts multisketching performance but provides no theorem or experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A High Performance GPU CountSketch Implementation and Its Application to Multisketching and Least Squares Problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXVSU43I

@misc{pith2026250814209,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A High Performance GPU CountSketch Implementation and Its Application to Multisketching and Least Squares Problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXVSU43I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14209}
}
abstract

Random sketching is a dimensionality reduction technique that approximately preserves norms and singular values up to some $O(1)$ distortion factor with high probability. The most popular sketches in literature are the Gaussian sketch and the subsampled randomized Hadamard transform, while the CountSketch has lower complexity. Combining two sketches, known as multisketching, offers an inexpensive means of quickly reducing the dimension of a matrix by combining a CountSketch and Gaussian sketch. However, there has been little investigation into high performance CountSketch implementations. In this work, we develop an efficient GPU implementation of the CountSketch, and demonstrate the performance of multisketching using this technique. We also demonstrate the potential for using this implementation within a multisketched least squares solver that is up to $77\%$ faster than the normal equations with significantly better numerical stability, at the cost of an $O(1)$ multiplicative factor introduced into the relative residual norm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Randomized Sketching is Robust to Low-Precision Rounding on GPUs

    cs.PF 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    FP16 SparseStack on GPUs shows embedding quality insensitive to rounding method, with sketch distribution as the primary accuracy driver across tested inputs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M. G. Mayer and J. H. D. Jensen,Elementary Theory of Nuclear Shell Structure(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1955)

    1955

  2. [2]

    Taniuchi, C

    R. Taniuchi, C. Santamaria, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, K. Yoneda, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, J. D. Holt, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, J. Menéndez, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, H. Otsu, T. Otsuka, C. Péron, S. Péru, A. Peyaud, E. C. Pollacco, A. ...

    2019

  3. [3]

    K. L. Jones, A. S. Adekola, D. W. Bardayan, J. C. Black- mon, K. Y. Chae, K. A. Chipps, J. A. Cizewski, L. Erik- son, C. Harlin, R. Hatarik, R. Kapler, R. L. Kozub, J. F. Liang, R. Livesay, Z. Ma, B. H. Moazen, C. D. Nesaraja, F. M. Nunes, S. D. Pain, N. P. Patterson, D. Shapira, J. F. Shriner, M. S. Smith, T. P. Swan, and J. S. Thomas, Nature ��� , 454 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Nuclear masses and deformations, Nuclear Physics��, 1 (1966)

    1966

  5. [5]

    Sobiczewski, F

    A. Sobiczewski, F. A. Gareev, and B. N. Kalinkin, Closed shells for z >82 and n >126 in a diffuse potential well, Phys. Letts. ��, 500 (1966)

    1966

  6. [6]

    Why and how should we investigate nuclides far off the stability line

    H. Meldner, in Proceedings of the international Lysekil Symposium “Why and how should we investigate nuclides far off the stability line”, Arkiv Fysik, Vol. 36 (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1967) pp. 593–598

    1967

  7. [7]

    V. M. Strutinsky, Shell effects in nuclear masses and de- formation energies, Nucl. Phys. A��, 420 (1967)

    1967

  8. [8]

    S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, Z. Szymański, S. Wycech, C. Gustafson, I.-L. Lamm, P. Möller, and B. Nilsson, On the nuclear structure and stability of heavy and superheavy elements, Nucl. Phys. A��� , 1 (1969)

    1969

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Ćwiok, J

    S. Ćwiok, J. Dobaczewski, P.-H. Heenen, P. Magierski, and W. Nazarewicz, Shell structure of the superheavy elements, Nuclear Physics A��� , 211 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    Bender, K

    M. Bender, K. Rutz, P.-G. Reinhard, J. A. Maruhn, and W. Greiner, Shell structure of superheavy nuclei in self- consistent mean-field models, Phys. Rev. C��, 034304 (1999)

    1999

  3. [11]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self- consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. ��, 121 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    Schwerdtfeger, Colloquium: Superheavy elements: Oganesson and beyond, Rev

    S.A.Giuliani, Z.Matheson, W.Nazarewicz, E.Olsen, P.- G.Reinhard, J.Sadhukhan, B.Schuetrumpf, N.Schunck, and P. Schwerdtfeger, Colloquium: Superheavy elements: Oganesson and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. ��, 011001 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Nakada and K

    H. Nakada and K. Sugiura, Predicting magic numbers of nuclei with semi-realistic nucleon–nucleon interactions, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics���� , 033D02 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    These values roughly yield energy minima in the largest model-space size un- der consideration

    We compute 208,209Pb and 209Bi at a harmonic oscillator frequency of �Ω = 12 MeV and use �Ω = 10 MeV for 266,267Pb and 267Bi. These values roughly yield energy minima in the largest model-space size un- der consideration. We employ three-nucleon potentials in the normal-ordere...

  7. [15]

    A. V. Afanasjev, S. E. Agbemava, D. Ray, and P. Ring, Neutron drip line: Single-particle degrees of freedom and pairing properties as sources of theoretical uncertainties, Phys. Rev. C��, 014324 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    J. J. Li, W. H. Long, J. Margueron, and N. Van Giai, Superheavy magic structures in the relativistic hartree–fock–bogoliubov approach, Physics Letters B ��� , 169 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    B.-A. Li, C. M. Ko, and W. Bauer, Isospin physics in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E ��, 147 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, T. Nakatsukasa, and P. Ring, Covariant density functional theory: Reexamin- ing the structure of superheavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C��, 6 054310 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Kim, M.-H

    S. Kim, M.-H. Mun, M.-K. Cheoun, and E. Ha, Shape coexistence and neutron skin thickness of pb isotopes by the deformed relativistic hartree-bogoliubov theory in continuum, Phys. Rev. C��� , 034340 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Centelles, S

    M. Centelles, S. K. Patra, X. Roca-Maza, B. K. Sharma, P. D. Stevenson, and X. Viñas, The influence of the symmetry energy on the giant monopole resonance of neutron-rich nuclei analyzed in thomas–fermi theory, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.��, 075107 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    M. V. Stoitsov, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, S. Pit- tel, and D. J. Dean, Systematic study of deformed nuclei at the drip lines and beyond, Phys. Rev. C��, 054312 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    J. Meng, H. Toki, J. Y. Zeng, S. Q. Zhang, and S.-G. Zhou, Giant halo at the neutron drip line in Ca iso- topes in relativistic continuum Hartree-Bogoliubov the- ory, Phys. Rev. C��, 041302 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    A. V. Afanasjev, S. E. Agbemava, D. Ray, and P. Ring, Nuclear landscape in covariant density functional theory, Phys. Lett. B��� , 680 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Erler, N

    J. Erler, N. Birge, M. Kortelainen, W. Nazarewicz, E. Olsen, A. M. Perhac, and M. Stoitsov, The limits of the nuclear landscape, Nature��� , 509 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Ekström, C

    A. Ekström, C. Forssén, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, W. Jiang, and T. Papenbrock, What is ab initio in nu- clear theory?, Front. Phys.��, 1129094 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Hergert, A guided tour of ab initio nuclear many-body theory, Frontiers in Physics�, 10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 (2020)

    H. Hergert, A guided tour of ab initio nuclear many-body theory, Frontiers in Physics�, 10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Epelbaum, H.-W

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Mod- ern theory of nuclear forces, Rev. Mod. Phys.��, 1773 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B��� , 288 (1990)

    1990

  21. [29]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei, Rep. Prog. Phys.��, 096302 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Machleidt and D

    R. Machleidt and D. Entem, Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces, Phys. Rep.��� , 1 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Lee, Lattice simulations for few- and many-body sys- tems, Prog

    D. Lee, Lattice simulations for few- and many-body sys- tems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.��, 117 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Dickhoff and C

    W. Dickhoff and C. Barbieri, Self-consistent green’s func- tion method for nuclei and nuclear matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. ��, 377 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    S. R. Stroberg, H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, and J. D. Holt, Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.��, 307 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Hergert, S

    H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, The in-medium similarity renormalization group: A novel ab initio method for nuclei, Phys. Rep. ��� , 165 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Hebeler, V

    K. Hebeler, V. Durant, J. Hoppe, M. Heinz, A. Schwenk, J. Simonis, and A. Tichai, Normal ordering of three- nucleon interactions for ab initio calculations of heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C��� , 024310 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    B. Hu, W. Jiang, T. Miyagi, Z. Sun, A. Ekström, C. Forssén, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, T. Papenbrock, S. R. Stroberg, and I. Vernon, Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces, Nature Physics ��, 1196 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Caballero-Folch, C

    R. Caballero-Folch, C. Domingo-Pardo, J. Agramunt, A. Algora, F. Ameil, A. Arcones, Y. Ayyad, J. Ben- lliure, I. N. Borzov, M. Bowry, F. Calviño, D. Cano- Ott, G. Cortés, T. Davinson, I. Dillmann, A. Estrade, A. Evdokimov, T. Faestermann, F. Farinon, D. Galaviz, A. R. García, ...

    2016

  30. [38]

    Arthuis, K

    P. Arthuis, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Neutron-rich nuclei and neutron skins from chiral low-resolution inter- actions (2024), arXiv:2401.06675 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    C. Yuan, M. Liu, N. Shimizu, Z. Podolyák, T. Suzuki, T. Otsuka, and Z. Liu, Shell-model study on spectro- scopic properties in the region “south” of 208Pb, Phys. Rev. C ��� , 044314 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Naïdja, New shell-model investigation of the lead-208 mass region: Spectroscopic properties and collectivity, Phys

    H. Naïdja, New shell-model investigation of the lead-208 mass region: Spectroscopic properties and collectivity, Phys. Rev. C��� , 054303 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    R. Lică, A. N. Andreyev, H. Naïdja, A. Blazhev, P. Van Duppen, B. Andel, A. Algora, S. Antalic, J. Ben- ito, G. Benzoni, T. Berry, M. J. G. Borge, C. Costache, J. G. Cubiss, H. De Witte, L. M. Fraile, H. O. U. Fynbo, P. T. Greenlees, L. J. Harkness-Brennan, M. Huyse, A. Illana...

    2025

  34. [42]

    T. T. Yeung, A. I. Morales, J. Wu, M. Liu, C. Yuan, S. Nishimura, V. H. Phong, N. Fukuda, J. L. Tain, T. Davinson, K. P. Rykaczewski, R. Yokoyama, T. Isobe, M. Niikura, Z. Podolyák, G. Alcalá, A. Algora, J. M. All- mond, J. Agramunt, C. Appleton, H. Baba, R. Caballero- Folch, ...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Pfützner, P

    M. Pfützner, P. Armbruster, T. Baumann, J. Benlliure, M. Bernas, W. N. Catford, D. Cortina-Gil, J. M. Daugas, 7 H. Geissel, M. Górska, H. Grawe, R. Grzywacz, M. Hell- ström, N. Iwasa, Z. Janas, A. R. Junghans, M. Karny, S. Leenhardt, M. Lewitowicz, A. Mueller, F. de Oliviera, ...

    1998

  36. [44]

    G. G. Kiss and Z. Podolyák, Structure and astrophysical role of the neutron-rich55 ≤ z ≤ 92 isotopes: status and perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. A��, 175 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Gottardo, J

    A. Gottardo, J. J. Valiente-Dobón, G. Benzoni, R. Nicol- ini, A. Gadea, S. Lunardi, P. Boutachkov, A. M. Bruce, M. Górska, J. Grebosz, S. Pietri, Z. Podolyák, M. Pfützner, P. H. Regan, H. Weick, J. Alcántara Núñez, A. Algora, N. Al-Dahan, G. de Angelis, Y. Ayyad, N. Alkhomashi...

    2012

  38. [46]

    J. J. Valiente-Dobón, A. Gottardo, G. Benzoni, A. Gadea, S. Lunardi, A. Algora, G. de Angelis, D. Bazzacco, J. Benlliure, P. Boutachkov, A. Bracco, A. M. Bruce, F. Camera, E. Casarejos, M. Cortés, F. C. L. Crespi, A. Corsi, C. Domingo-Pardo, M. Don- cel, T. Engert, H. Geissel,...

    2021

  39. [47]

    National Nuclear Data Center, NuDat Database,������ ������������������������� (2025), information ex- tracted from the NuDat database

    2025

  40. [48]

    Hebeler, S

    K. Hebeler, S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions, Phys. Rev. C ��, 031301 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    D. R. Entem and R. Machleidt, Accurate charge- dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. C ��, 041001 (2003)

    2003

  42. [50]

    S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, and R. J. Perry, Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. C��, 061001 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    Hagen, G

    G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, and T. Papenbrock, Structure of 78Ni from first-principles computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 172501 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Epelbaum, Few-nucleon forces and systems in chiral effective field theory, Prog

    E. Epelbaum, Few-nucleon forces and systems in chiral effective field theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. ��, 654 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    Simonis, S

    J. Simonis, S. R. Stroberg, K. Hebeler, J. D. Holt, and A. Schwenk, Saturation with chiral interactions and con- sequences for finite nuclei, Phys. Rev. C ��, 014303 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Simonis, K

    J. Simonis, K. Hebeler, J. D. Holt, J. Menendez, and A. Schwenk, Exploring sd-shell nuclei from two- and three-nucleon interactions with realistic saturation prop- erties, Phys. Rev. C��, 011302 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, D. J. Dean, A. Schwenk, A. Nogga, M. Włoch, and P. Piecuch, Coupled-cluster theory for three-body Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. C ��, 034302 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    T. D. Morris, J. Simonis, S. R. Stroberg, C. Stumpf, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. Papenbrock, R. Roth, and A. Schwenk, Structure of the lightest tin isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 152503 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Miyagi, S

    T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, P. Navrátil, K. Hebeler, and J. D. Holt, Converged ab initio calculations of heavy nu- clei, Phys. Rev. C��� , 014302 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    R. Roth, S. Binder, K. Vobig, A. Calci, J. Langham- mer, and P. Navrátil, Medium-Mass Nuclei with Normal- Ordered Chiral N N+3N Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 052501 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    and Stroberg [60]. In these computations we adopt an energy cut E3,max = 28 �٠on three-body matrix elements [57], which ensures sufficiently well converged ground-state energies and excited spectra for208Pb and 266Pb. �������� We solve the quantum many-body problem with the c...

  52. [60]

    Rothman, B

    M. Rothman, B. Johnson-Toth, F. Bonaiti, G. Hagen, M. Heinz, and T. Papenbrock, Exactness of the normal- ordered two-body truncation of three-nucleon forces, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.01507 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Miyagi, NuHamil : A numerical code to generate nu- clear two- and three-body matrix elements from chiral effective field theory, The European Physical Journal A ��, 150 (2023)

    T. Miyagi, NuHamil : A numerical code to generate nu- clear two- and three-body matrix elements from chiral effective field theory, The European Physical Journal A ��, 150 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    S. R. Stroberg, IMSRG++ (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Coester and H

    F. Coester and H. Kümmel, Short-range correlations in nuclear wave functions, Nuclear Physics��, 477 (1960)

    1960

  56. [64]

    Kümmel, K

    H. Kümmel, K. H. Lührmann, and J. G. Zabolitzky, Many-fermion theory in expS- (or coupled cluster) form, Phys. Rep. ��, 1 (1978)

    1978

  57. [65]

    R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiał, Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys.��, 291 (2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, D. J. Dean, and M. Hjorth- Jensen, Medium-mass nuclei from chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 092502 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, D. J. Dean, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and B. V. Asokan,Ab initiocomputation of neutron-rich oxygen isotopes, Phys. Rev. C��, 021306 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Z. H. Sun, C. A. Bell, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock, How to renormalize coupled cluster theory, Phys. Rev. C ��� , L061302 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. a systematic biorthogonal ap- proach to molecular excitation energies, transition prob- abilities, and excited state properties, J. Chem. Phys.��, 7029 (1993)

    1993

  62. [70]

    J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, Economical triple ex- citation equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for excitation energies, Chem. Phys. Lett.��� , 81 (1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    T. J. Watson Jr., V. F. Lotrich, P. G. Szalay, A. Perera, and R. J. Bartlett, Benchmarking for perturbative triple- excitations in ee-eom-cc methods, J. Phys. Chem. A��� , 2569 (2013). 8

    2013

  64. [72]

    J. R. Gour, P. Piecuch, and M. Włoch, Active-space equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for excited states of radicals and other open-shell systems: Ea- eomccsdt and ip-eomccsdt, J. Chem. Phys.��� , 134113 (2005)

    2005

  65. [73]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, and M. Hjorth-Jensen,Ab Ini- tio Computation of the17� Proton Halo State and Res- onances in A = 17 Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 182501 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    Heusler, R

    A. Heusler, R. V. Jolos, T. Faestermann, R. Herten- berger, H.-F. Wirth, and P. von Brentano, Complete identification of states in 208Pb below Ex = 6 .2 mev, Phys. Rev. C��, 054321 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    Goriely, N

    S. Goriely, N. Chamel, and J. M. Pearson, Skyrme- hartree-fock-bogoliubov nuclear mass formulas: Crossing the 0.6 mev accuracy threshold with microscopically de- duced pairing, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 152503 (2009)

    2009

  68. [76]

    Möller, R

    P. Möller, R. Bengtsson, B. G. Carlsson, P. Olivius, and T. Ichikawa, Global calculations of ground-state axial shape asymmetry of nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 162502 (2006)

    2006

  69. [77]

    Kortelainen, T

    M. Kortelainen, T. Lesinski, J. Moré, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M. V. Stoitsov, and S. Wild, Nuclear energy density optimization, Phys. Rev. C��, 024313 (2010)

    2010

  70. [78]

    Zurek, S

    L. Zurek, S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, R. Navarro Pérez, N. Schunck, and A. Schwenk, Optimized nuclear energy density functionals including long-range pion contributions, Phys. Rev. C��� , 014319 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The ame 2020 atomic mass evaluation (ii). tables, graphs and references*, Chinese Physics C��, 030003 (2021)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Goutte, J

    D. Goutte, J. B. Bellicard, J. M. Cavedon, B. Frois, M. Huet, P. Leconte, P. X. Ho, S. Platchkov, J. Heisen- berg, J. Lichtenstadt, C. N. Papanicolas, and I. Sick, Determination of the transition charge density of the octupole vibration in 208Pb, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��, 1618 (1980)

    1980

  73. [81]

    Spear, W

    R. Spear, W. Vermeer, M. Esat, J. Kuehner, A. Bax- ter, and S. Hinds, An improved determination of the quadrupole moment of the first excited state of 208pb, Physics Letters B��� , 29 (1983)

    1983

  74. [82]

    Schramm, K

    M. Schramm, K. H. Maier, M. Rejmund, L. D. Wood, N. Roy, A. Kuhnert, A. Aprahamian, J. Becker, M. Brinkman, D. J. Decman, E. A. Henry, R. Hoff, D. Manatt, L. G. Mann, R. A. Meyer, W. Stoeffl, G. L. Struble, and T.-F. Wang, Study of excited states in208pb by particle-γ coincide...

    1997

  75. [83]

    Heusler, R

    A. Heusler, R. Jolos, and P. Brentano, Excitation ener- gies of particle–hole states in 208 pb and the surface delta interaction, Phys. Atom. Nuclei��, 860 (2013)

    2013

  76. [84]

    Bender, W

    M. Bender, W. Nazarewicz, and P.-G. Reinhard, Shell stabilization of super- and hyperheavy nuclei without magic gaps, Physics Letters B��� , 42 (2001)

    2001

  77. [85]

    Duguet and G

    T. Duguet and G. Hagen, Ab initio approach to effec- tive single-particle energies in doubly closed shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C��, 034330 (2012)

    2012

  78. [86]

    Duguet, H

    T. Duguet, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, and V. Somà, Nonob- servable nature of the nuclear shell structure: Meaning, illustrations, and consequences, Phys. Rev. C��, 034313 (2015)

    2015

  79. [87]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Meng, and S. Zhou, Proton magic even-even isotopes and giant halos of Ca isotopes with relativistic continuum Hartree-Bogoliubov theory, Science in China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy��, 632 (2003)

    2003

  80. [88]

    A. V. Afanasjev and S. Frauendorf, Central depression in nuclear density and its consequences for the shell structure of superheavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C��, 024308 (2005)

    2005

  81. [89]

    Bonaiti, G

    F. Bonaiti, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock, Data: Struc- ture of the doubly magic nuclei208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations, 10.5281/zenodo.16911378 (2025)

    2025 doi

  82. [90]

    Caurier, M

    E. Caurier, M. Rejmund, and H. Grawe, Large-scale shell model calculations for then = 126 isotones po–pu, Phys. Rev. C ��, 054310 (2003)

    2003

  83. [91]

    A. P. Leppänen, J. Uusitalo, M. Leino, S. Eeckhaudt, T. Grahn, P. T. Greenlees, P. Jones, R. Julin, S. Juuti- nen, H. Kettunen, P. Kuusiniemi, P. Nieminen, J. Pakari- nen, P. Rahkila, C. Scholey, and G. Sletten, α decay studies of the nuclides218U and 219U, Phys. Rev. C��, 054...

    2007

  84. [92]

    shell diffusion

    P. Jerabek, B. Schuetrumpf, P. Schwerdtfeger, and W. Nazarewicz, Electron and nucleon localization func- tions of oganesson: Approaching the thomas-fermi limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 053001 (2018). 9 ��������� �� ��� ������ ����� ������ 208�� ��� 266�� ���� �� ������ ���������...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.