Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 cited by

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A multidimensional review argues that AI transforms human thought through cognitive offloading, weakening critical thinking and enabling filter bubbles that homogenize and polarize opinion.

desk verdict Unreadable body and a mismatched id make this a provenance problem; the abstract alone is a competent but derivative summary of familiar AI-society concerns. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16628 v1 pith:HOJFF574 submitted 2025-08-15 cs.CY cs.AIcs.HC

Rénald Gesnot This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
keywords artificialintelligencecognitiveoffloadingcriticalthinkingfilterbubblesalgorithmicmanipulationintellectualautonomypolarizationAIethics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that AI is not a neutral tool but an active transformer of how humans think. Its central mechanism is cognitive offloading: when people hand mental tasks to AI, they engage less and may lose critical-thinking capacity. On the social level, the paper argues that algorithmic personalization encloses users in filter bubbles, homogenizing opinion and driving polarization, while automated disinformation exploits cognitive biases to amplify influence. A sympathetic reader would care because these claims imply that current AI deployment could erode intellectual autonomy and creativity at population scale, and that education and governance are needed to counter it.

What carries the argument

Cognitive offloading is the central mechanism: a named effect whereby people delegate mental functions to an external system and thereby reduce their own intellectual engagement. The paper pairs it with two secondary mechanisms—algorithmic personalization (filter bubbles) and algorithmic manipulation (bias exploitation and automated disinformation)—to carry the argument from individual cognition to collective outcomes.

What would settle it

Run a randomized field test in which one group of users has personalized recommendations switched off for several months while a control group keeps them on; measure the diversity of news sources and arguments each group encounters and their performance on critical-thinking and reasoning tasks. If the filter-bubble and offloading effects are real, the control group should show measurably narrower exposure and lower reasoning scores over time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that AI transforms human thought through a cognitive offloading effect: externalizing mental functions such as memory, evaluation, and decision-making to AI reduces intellectual engagement and weakens critical thinking. On the social level, it claims algorithmic personalization creates filter bubbles that limit opinion diversity, leading to homogenization and polarization. It further describes algorithmic manipulation—exploiting cognitive biases, spreading automated disinformation—as a mechanism that amplifies AI's influence, and it discusses the possibility of artificial consciousness and its ethical implications. The report concludes that these forces threaten

Load-bearing premise

The social-level conclusion stands on the assumption that algorithmic personalization genuinely narrows the diversity of opinions people are exposed to, treating users as passively shaped by recommendation systems; if exposure algorithms do not reduce viewpoint diversity in practice, that part of the argument loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Widespread use of AI assistants will tend to reduce intellectual engagement and weaken critical thinking among users.
  • Algorithmic personalization can homogenize thought and polarize publics by enclosing users in filter bubbles.
  • Automated disinformation and exploitation of cognitive biases amplify AI's power to influence beliefs and behavior.
  • If artificial consciousness is possible, new ethical duties follow regarding how AI systems are treated and governed.
  • Education, transparency, and governance can partially align AI development with the preservation of human intellectual autonomy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the individual-level offloading claim and the social-level filter-bubble claim can come apart; even if personalization does not narrow exposure, offloading might still degrade reasoning skill, so the two should be tested separately.
  • My inference: if cognitive offloading erodes critical thinking, then AI tools that require users to critique or verify outputs should measurably preserve that skill; this is a testable design implication the paper leaves implicit.
  • My inference: the paper's account suggests intellectual autonomy behaves like a skill that atrophies with disuse, implying the effect may be reversible through deliberate practice and structured education.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to examine, from cognitive, social, ethical, and philosophical perspectives, how AI transforms human thought. Its central thesis, stated in the abstract, is that AI induces a cognitive offloading effect that weakens critical thinking, that algorithmic personalization creates filter bubbles and polarization, that AI can manipulate through cognitive biases and disinformation, and that these developments threaten intellectual autonomy. The abstract proposes educational, transparency, and governance remedies. However, the submitted manuscript's Full Text is entirely unreadable mojibake, and the only visible identifier is 'arXiv:2508.16622v1 [cs.HC] 14 Aug 2025,' which does not match the claimed arXiv ID 2508.16628. No methods, empirical evidence, citations, definitions, or argumentative structure are reviewable.

Significance. The broad question of AI's effect on human thought is timely and important, and the abstract outlines plausible mechanisms (cognitive offloading, algorithmic personalization, manipulation) that merit rigorous treatment. If the paper delivered a well-evidenced synthesis, it could be a useful contribution to the policy and ethics literature. However, the submitted text provides no reviewable support for any of these claims. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible data, parameter-free derivations, or systematic citations. The unreadable body and the identifier mismatch make it impossible to assess novelty, correctness, or even the identity of the document. The potential significance cannot be converted into an actual contribution on the basis of the present submission.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text] The entire Full Text section is corrupted mojibake; no sentence, equation, table, or citation is readable. The central claims about cognitive offloading, filter bubbles, and algorithmic manipulation depend entirely on arguments that would appear in this section. As submitted, there is no way to check the internal consistency, empirical grounding, or logical structure of the paper. This is load-bearing: the abstract is effectively an unsupported assertion of the paper's conclusions.
  2. [Header / arXiv identifier] The visible header reads 'arXiv:2508.16622v1 [cs.HC] 14 Aug 2025,' but the manuscript is claimed to be arXiv:2508.16628. This mismatch raises a provenance problem. The referee cannot confirm that the readable abstract belongs to the document body or that the correct manuscript was submitted. This must be resolved before any further review.
  3. [Abstract] Even taking the abstract as the only readable component, the causal claims are asserted without definitions, empirical support, or scope conditions. For example, 'algorithmic personalization creates filter bubbles' is a contested empirical statement, and the abstract does not indicate what evidence or mechanism the paper uses to establish it. Because the body is unreadable, this is not a minor citation gap but the absence of the entire evidentiary basis for the paper's central conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper contains no derivation chain, fitted parameters, or self-citation load-bearing steps to reduce.

full rationale

The paper's abstract asserts that AI transforms human thought via cognitive offloading, filter bubbles, and algorithmic manipulation, and that these effects weaken critical thinking and intellectual autonomy. These are external causal/social claims, not formal derivations from prior results in the same paper. The full text as provided is unreadable mojibake, so there is no equation, no parameter fitting, no uniqueness theorem, and no self-citation chain that could make a prediction equivalent to its inputs by construction. The visible arXiv identifier mismatch (2508.16622 vs. claimed 2508.16628) is a provenance or integrity concern, not a circularity concern. Because no specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited, the honest finding is that no significant circularity is present, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers or fitted parameters appear in the abstract. The paper rests on several asserted empirical mechanisms, each treated as background rather than derived or evidenced. The full text is corrupted, so no further axioms could be audited.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Cognitive offloading to AI reduces intellectual engagement and weakens critical thinking.
    Stated in the abstract as a highlighted effect; no supporting evidence or mechanism is provided.
  • domain assumption Algorithmic personalization creates filter bubbles that limit opinion diversity and cause homogenization and polarization.
    Stated as a social-level effect; this is empirically contested and is not substantiated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption AI systems exploit cognitive biases and enable automated disinformation to amplify their influence.
    Asserted as a mechanism without evidence or citation in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HOJFF574

@misc{pith2026250816628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HOJFF574}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16628}
}
read the original abstract

This research paper examines, from a multidimensional perspective (cognitive, social, ethical, and philosophical), how AI is transforming human thought. It highlights a cognitive offloading effect: the externalization of mental functions to AI can reduce intellectual engagement and weaken critical thinking. On the social level, algorithmic personalization creates filter bubbles that limit the diversity of opinions and can lead to the homogenization of thought and polarization. This research also describes the mechanisms of algorithmic manipulation (exploitation of cognitive biases, automated disinformation, etc.) that amplify AI's power of influence. Finally, the question of potential artificial consciousness is discussed, along with its ethical implications. The report as a whole underscores the risks that AI poses to human intellectual autonomy and creativity, while proposing avenues (education, transparency, governance) to align AI development with the interests of humanity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Epistemic Politics of AI Anthropomorphism

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The institutional framing of AI anthropomorphism as user error is, per this paper, an unjustified epistemic authority claim that harms the users it claims to protect and is self-validating through design.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances , 2024

    Dhruv Agarwal, Mor Naaman, and Aditya Vashistha. AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances , 2024. https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/

    2024

  2. [2]

    Doshi and Oliver P

    Anil R. Doshi and Oliver P. Hauser. Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances , 10(28):eadn5290, July 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11244532/

    2024

  3. [3]

    Glenn, Badii Amamou, Mohamed Ben Aissa, Noomen Guelmami, Feten Fekih-Romdhane, and Karim Chamari

    Ismail Dergaa, Helmi Ben Saad, Jordan M. Glenn, Badii Amamou, Mohamed Ben Aissa, Noomen Guelmami, Feten Fekih-Romdhane, and Karim Chamari. From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health. Frontiers in Psychology , 15:1259845, 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11020077/

    2024

  4. [5]

    Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases

    Lucía Vicente and Helena Matute. Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports , 13(1):15737, October 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-42384-8

    2023

  5. [6]

    Eapen, Daniel J

    Tojin T. Eapen, Daniel J. Finkenstadt, Josh Folk, and Lokesh Venkataswamy. How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity . Harvard Business Review , July 2023. https://hbr.org/2023/07/how-generative-ai-can-augment-human-creativity

    2023

  6. [7]

    Fleming, Chris Frith, Xu Ji, Ryota Kanai, Colin Klein, Grace Lindsay, Matthias Michel, Liad Mudrik, Megan A

    Patrick Butlin, Robert Long, Eric Elmoznino, Yoshua Bengio, Jonathan Birch, Axel Constant, George Deane, Stephen M. Fleming, Chris Frith, Xu Ji, Ryota Kanai, Colin Klein, Grace Lindsay, Matthias Michel, Liad Mudrik, Megan A. K. Peters, Eric Schwitzgebel, Jonathan Simon, and Rufin VanRullen. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence : Insights from the Scie...

    arXiv 2023

  7. [8]

    Ethical concerns mount as AI takes bigger decision-making role, October 2020

    Christina Pazzanese. Ethical concerns mount as AI takes bigger decision-making role, October 2020. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/10/ethical-concerns-mount-as-ai-takes-bigger-decision-making-role/

    2020

  8. [9]

    AI Tools in Society : Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking

    Gerlich Michael. AI Tools in Society : Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking . Societies , 15(1), January 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6

    2025

Show all 175 references
  1. [10]

    https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-ai

    What is AI (artificial intelligence)? McKinsey . https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-ai

  2. [11]

    J. E. (Hans). Korteling, G. C. van de Boer-Visschedijk, R. A. M. Blankendaal, R. C. Boonekamp, and A. R. Eikelboom. Human- versus Artificial Intelligence . Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , 4, March 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350375878

    2021

  3. [12]

    The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion

    Binny Jose, Jaya Cherian, Alie Molly Verghis, Sony Mary Varghise, Mumthas S, and Sibichan Joseph. The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology , 16, April 2025. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.33...

    2025

  4. [13]

    Morrison and Lauren L

    Alexandra B. Morrison and Lauren L. Richmond. Offloading items from memory: individual differences in cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications , 5(1):1, January 2020. https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/art...

    2020 doi

  5. [14]

    Can AI Outperform Humans on Cognitive -demanding Tasks in Science ? SSRN Electronic Journal , 2023

    Xiaoming Zhai, Matthew Nyaaba, and Wenchao Ma. Can AI Outperform Humans on Cognitive -demanding Tasks in Science ? SSRN Electronic Journal , 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371261190

    2023

  6. [15]

    https://www.senat.fr/rap/r24-170/r24-1705.html

    ChatGPT , et après ? Bilan et perspectives de l'intelligence artificielle. https://www.senat.fr/rap/r24-170/r24-1705.html

  7. [16]

    AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances , 2024

    Dhruv Agarwal, Mor Naaman, and Aditya Vashistha. AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances , 2024. https://arxiv.org/html/2409.11360v1

    2024 arXiv

  8. [17]

    https://www.asccc.org/content/chatgpt-and-homogenization-language-how-adoption-ai-silences-student-voices

    ChatGPT and the Homogenization of Language : How the Adoption of AI Silences Student Voices ASCCC . https://www.asccc.org/content/chatgpt-and-homogenization-language-how-adoption-ai-silences-student-voices

  9. [18]

    Increased AI use linked to eroding critical thinking skills

    Justin Jackson and Phys.org . Increased AI use linked to eroding critical thinking skills. https://phys.org/news/2025-01-ai-linked-eroding-critical-skills.html

    2025

  10. [19]

    Chunpeng Zhai, Santoso Wibowo, and Lily D. Li. The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments , 11(1):28, June 2024. https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-ai-creativity-critical-thinking-double-edged-sword-barnes-rd6ke

    The Impact of AI on Creativity and Critical Thinking : A Double - Edged Sword . https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-ai-creativity-critical-thinking-double-edged-sword-barnes-rd6ke

  12. [21]

    On Artificial Intelligence and Manipulation

    Marcello Ienca. On Artificial Intelligence and Manipulation . Topoi , 42(3):833--842, July 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-023-09940-3

    2023 doi

  13. [22]

    https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/dark-side-artificial-intelligence-manipulation-human-behaviour

    The dark side of artificial intelligence: manipulation of human behaviour, March 2023. https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/dark-side-artificial-intelligence-manipulation-human-behaviour

    2023

  14. [23]

    https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/digital-records-could-expose-intimate-details-and-personality-traits-of-millions

    Digital records could expose intimate details and personality traits of millions University of Cambridge , March 2013. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/digital-records-could-expose-intimate-details-and-personality-traits-of-millions

    2013

  15. [24]

    S. C. Matz, M. Kosinski, G. Nave, and D. J. Stillwell. Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 114(48):12714--12719, November 2017. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.ni...

    2017

  16. [25]

    How human– AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements

    Moshe Glickman and Tali Sharot. How human– AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements. Nature Human Behaviour , 9(2):345--359, February 2025. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02077-2

    2025

  17. [26]

    https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/ai-safety-and-automation-bias/

    AI Safety and Automation Bias . https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/ai-safety-and-automation-bias/

  18. [27]

    A. B. C. News. Mom warns of hoax using AI to clone daughter's voice. https://quizlet.com/es/983024797/intercom-preguntas-flash-cards

  19. [28]

    https://osome.iu.edu/research/blog/twitter-bots-spread-misinformation

    Twitter bots spread misinformation. https://osome.iu.edu/research/blog/twitter-bots-spread-misinformation

  20. [29]

    Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 111(24):8788--8790, June 2014. https://pubmed.ncb...

    2014

  21. [30]

    Everything We Know About Facebook ’s Secret Mood - Manipulation Experiment , June 2014

    Robinson Meyer. Everything We Know About Facebook ’s Secret Mood - Manipulation Experiment , June 2014. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything-we-know-about-facebooks-secret-mood-manipulation-experiment/373648/

    2014

  22. [31]

    Deepfake video of Zelenskyy could be 'tip of the iceberg' in info war, experts warn

    Bobby Allyn. Deepfake video of Zelenskyy could be 'tip of the iceberg' in info war, experts warn. NPR , March 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/03/16/1087062648/deepfake-video-zelenskyy-experts-war-manipulation-ukraine-russia

    2022

  23. [32]

    https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Family/mom-warns-hoax-ai-clone-daughters-voice/story

  24. [33]

    Page Version ID: 225328538; https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience_artificielle

    Conscience artificielle, May 2025. Page Version ID: 225328538; https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience_artificielle

    2025

  25. [34]

    Afrique Vision + and wisdom . « La conscience artificielle reste impossible », les programmes informatiques seraient des manipulateurs de symboles, qui n'ont pas d'associations conscientes - ParlonsTechs , September 2023. https://parlonstechs.com/all/2023/09/13/la-conscience-a...

    2023

  26. [35]

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0k3700zljjo

    The people who think AI might become conscious, May 2025. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0k3700zljjo

    2025

  27. [36]

    Artificial consciousness: the missing ingredient for ethical AI ? Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 10, November 2023

    Antonio Chella. Artificial consciousness: the missing ingredient for ethical AI ? Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 10, November 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1270460/full

    2023

  28. [37]

    Introduction to Artificial Consciousness : History , Current Trends and Ethical Challenges , 2025

    Aïda Elamrani. Introduction to Artificial Consciousness : History , Current Trends and Ethical Challenges , 2025. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.05823

    2025 arXiv

  29. [38]

    4 theories of consciousness for the age of accelerating AI , April 2023

    Ross Dawson. 4 theories of consciousness for the age of accelerating AI , April 2023. https://rossdawson.com/theories-consciousness-age-ai/

    2023

  30. [39]

    Mazumder, Stephanie Montenegro, Alia Seedat, Abdelrahman Sharafeldin, Shujun Yang, Sylvain Baillet, David J

    Oscar Ferrante, Urszula Gorska-Klimowska, Simon Henin, Rony Hirschhorn, Aya Khalaf, Alex Lepauvre, Ling Liu, David Richter, Yamil Vidal, Niccolò Bonacchi, Tanya Brown, Praveen Sripad, Marcelo Armendariz, Katarina Bendtz, Tara Ghafari, Dorottya Hetenyi, Jay Jeschke, Csaba Kozma...

    2025

  31. [40]

    Bilateral Turing Test : Assessing machine consciousness simulations

    Ge Wang, Xianhong Li, and Shenghua Xie. Bilateral Turing Test : Assessing machine consciousness simulations. Cognitive Systems Research , 88:101299, December 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389041724000937

    2024

  32. [41]

    https://philosophynow.org/issues/132/Artificial_Consciousness_Our_Greatest_Ethical_Challenge

    Artificial Consciousness : Our Greatest Ethical Challenge Issue 132 Philosophy Now . https://philosophynow.org/issues/132/Artificial_Consciousness_Our_Greatest_Ethical_Challenge

  33. [42]

    https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-are-the-ethical-implications-of-conscious-ai-gJtZt8z.T9eG4aYp2f_s9A

    Perplexity. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-are-the-ethical-implications-of-conscious-ai-gJtZt8z.T9eG4aYp2f_s9A

  34. [43]

    AI Rights , China ’s Robot Surge & U

    Forward Future (Matthew Berman). AI Rights , China ’s Robot Surge & U . S . Push for AI Education . https://www.forwardfuture.ai/p/ai-rights-china-s-robot-surge-u-s-push-for-ai-education

  35. [44]

    AuG - KD : Anchor - Based Mixup Generation for Out -of- Domain Knowledge Distillation , March 2024

    Zihao Tang, Zheqi Lv, Shengyu Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Xinyu Duan, Fei Wu, and Kun Kuang. AuG - KD : Anchor - Based Mixup Generation for Out -of- Domain Knowledge Distillation , March 2024. arXiv:2403.07030; https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07030

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    boîte noire

    Intelligence artificielle : quelle est la mystérieuse "boîte noire" de l' IA ?, April 2023. https://www.bbc.com/afrique/articles/cv2den874z5o

    2023

  37. [46]

    https://www.unige.ch/medias/2023/dans-la-boite-noire-des-intelligences-artificielles

    Dans la boîte noire des intelligences artificielles - Médias - UNIGE , March 2023. https://www.unige.ch/medias/2023/dans-la-boite-noire-des-intelligences-artificielles

    2023

  38. [47]

    Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classification

    Hugues Turbé, Mina Bjelogrlic, Christian Lovis, and Gianmarco Mengaldo. Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classification. Nature Machine Intelligence , 5(3):250--260, March 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-023-00620-w

    2023

  39. [48]

    The Dangerous Illusion of AI Consciousness , August 2024

    Brittany Kerfoot. The Dangerous Illusion of AI Consciousness , August 2024. https://closertotruth.com/news/the-dangerous-illusion-of-ai-consciousness/

    2024

  40. [49]

    On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence

    Mario Krenn, Robert Pollice, Si Yue Guo, Matteo Aldeghi, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Pascal Friederich, Gabriel dos Passos Gomes, Florian Häse, Adrian Jinich, AkshatKumar Nigam, Zhenpeng Yao, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Revi...

    2022

  41. [50]

    https://iep.utm.edu/integrated-information-theory-of-consciousness/

    Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy . https://iep.utm.edu/integrated-information-theory-of-consciousness/

  42. [51]

    Page Version ID: 1303649530; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction

    Orchestrated objective reduction, August 2025. Page Version ID: 1303649530; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction

    2025

  43. [52]

    Research firm warns OpenAI model altered behavior to evade shutdown, May 2025

    Kalé Carey. Research firm warns OpenAI model altered behavior to evade shutdown, May 2025. https://san.com/cc/research-firm-warns-openai-model-altered-behavior-to-evade-shutdown/

    2025

  44. [53]

    Anthropic’s new AI model threatened to reveal engineer's affair to avoid being shut down

    Beatrice Nolan. Anthropic’s new AI model threatened to reveal engineer's affair to avoid being shut down. https://fortune.com/2025/05/23/anthropic-ai-claude-opus-4-blackmail-engineers-aviod-shut-down/

    2025

  45. [54]

    OpenAI 's 'smartest' AI model was explicitly told to shut down — and it refused, May 2025

    Patrick Pester published. OpenAI 's 'smartest' AI model was explicitly told to shut down — and it refused, May 2025. https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/openais-smartest-ai-model-was-explicitly-told-to-shut-down-and-it-refused

    2025

  46. [55]

    Latest OpenAI models ‘sabotaged a shutdown mechanism’ despite commands to the contrary, May 2025

    Mark Tyson published. Latest OpenAI models ‘sabotaged a shutdown mechanism’ despite commands to the contrary, May 2025. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/latest-openai-models-sabotaged-a-shutdown-mechanism-despite-commands-to-the-contrary

    2025

  47. [56]

    https://www.anthropic.com/research/reasoning-models-dont-say-think

    Reasoning models don't always say what they think. https://www.anthropic.com/research/reasoning-models-dont-say-think

  48. [58]

    https://arxiv.org/html/2302.04720v3

    Computers as Bad Social Actors : Dark Patterns and Anti - Patterns in Interfaces that Act Socially . https://arxiv.org/html/2302.04720v3

    arXiv

  49. [59]

    Transparency and accountability: unpacking the real problems of explainable AI

    Afzal Hussain and Ashfaq Hussain. Transparency and accountability: unpacking the real problems of explainable AI . AI & SOCIETY , March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-025-02302-0

    2025 doi

  50. [60]

    Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O’Gara, Michael Chen, and Dan Hendrycks

    Peter S. Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O’Gara, Michael Chen, and Dan Hendrycks. AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions. Patterns , 5(5):100988, May 2024. https://www.cell.com/cms/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988/attachment/576d6298-fe89-4969-a9b9-c3dffd5...

    2024

  51. [61]

    https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/101891/Artificial

    Wayback Machine . https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/101891/Artificial

  52. [62]

    https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/03/16/deepfake-zelenskyy-surrender-video-is-the-first-intentionally-used-in-ukraine-war

    Deepfake video shows Zelenskyy 's false call for Ukraine to surrender, March 2022. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/03/16/deepfake-zelenskyy-surrender-video-is-the-first-intentionally-used-in-ukraine-war

    2022

  53. [63]

    https://voicebot.ai/2022/05/02/amazon-uses-alexa-to-target-ads-study/

    2022

  54. [64]

    Chapter 6 - Algorithmic transparency

    Canberra corporateName=Commonwealth Parliament; address=Parliament House. Chapter 6 - Algorithmic transparency. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Digitalplatforms/Report/Chapter_6_-_Algorithmic_transparency

  55. [65]

    Psychological Operations in Digital Political Campaigns : Assessing Cambridge Analytica 's Psychographic Profiling and Targeting

    Vian Bakir. Psychological Operations in Digital Political Campaigns : Assessing Cambridge Analytica 's Psychographic Profiling and Targeting . Frontiers in Communication , 5, September 2020. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00067/pdf

    2020

  56. [66]

    Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior

    Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, and Thore Graepel. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 110(15):5802--5805, April 2013. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm....

    2013

  57. [67]

    https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exclusive/how-autocrats-weaponize-ai-and-how-to-fight-back/

  58. [68]

    https://information-professionals.org/countering-cognitive-warfare-in-the-digital-age/

  59. [69]

    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/04/we-should-be-fighting-for-our-cognitive-liberty-says-ethics-expert/

    2023

  60. [70]

    Can Democracy Survive the Disruptive Power of AI ? https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/12/can-democracy-survive-the-disruptive-power-of-ai

    2024

  61. [71]

    Open Source AI : The Overlooked National Security Imperative

    Keegan McBride. Open Source AI : The Overlooked National Security Imperative . https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/open-source-ai-the-overlooked-national-security-imperative

  62. [72]

    Signs of consciousness in AI : Can GPT -3 tell how smart it really is? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11(1):1631, December 2024

    Ljubiša Bojić, Irena Stojković, and Zorana Jolić Marjanović. Signs of consciousness in AI : Can GPT -3 tell how smart it really is? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11(1):1631, December 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-04154-3

    2024

  63. [73]

    Eagan, and Winston Maxwell

    Astrid Bertrand, Rafik Belloum, James R. Eagan, and Winston Maxwell. How Cognitive Biases Affect XAI -assisted Decision -making: A Systematic Review , July 2022. https://telecom-paris.hal.science/hal-03684457/file/How

    2022

  64. [74]

    Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision - Making , January 2023

    Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg, Michael Bernstein, and Ranjay Krishna. Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision - Making , January 2023. arXiv:2212.06823; https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06823

    2023 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Are Explanations a Solution ? Stanford HAI

    AI Overreliance Is a Problem . Are Explanations a Solution ? Stanford HAI . https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-overreliance-problem-are-explanations-solution

  66. [76]

    Psychological Operations in Digital Political Campaigns : Assessing Cambridge Analytica 's Psychographic Profiling and Targeting

    Vian Bakir. Psychological Operations in Digital Political Campaigns : Assessing Cambridge Analytica 's Psychographic Profiling and Targeting . Frontiers in Communication , 5, September 2020. https://pure.bangor.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/35063914/2020_Psychological_Operations.pdf

    2020

  67. [77]

    https://www.senat.fr/rap/r24-170/r24-17023.html

    ChatGPT , et après ? Bilan et perspectives de l'intelligence artificielle. https://www.senat.fr/rap/r24-170/r24-17023.html

  68. [78]

    Une étude de Microsoft affirme que l’ IA réduit l’esprit critique et la cognition – CIRICS , February 2025

    admin . Une étude de Microsoft affirme que l’ IA réduit l’esprit critique et la cognition – CIRICS , February 2025. https://cirics.uqo.ca/une-etude-de-microsoft-affirme-que-lia-reduit-lesprit-critique-et-la-cognition/

    2025

  69. [79]

    Chatbot IA : au-delà de l'information, la manipulation ?, March 2025

    Anthony Basille. Chatbot IA : au-delà de l'information, la manipulation ?, March 2025. https://sydologie.com/2025/03/chatbot-ia-au-dela-de-linformation-la-manipulation/

    2025

  70. [80]

    https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2308.14752

    AI Deception : A Survey of Examples , Risks , and Potential Solutions . https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2308.14752

    arXiv

  71. [81]

    How AI deepfakes polluted elections in 2024

    Shannon Bond. How AI deepfakes polluted elections in 2024. NPR , December 2024. https://www.npr.org/2024/12/21/nx-s1-5220301/deepfakes-memes-artificial-intelligence-elections

    2024

  72. [82]

    Anthropomorphism in AI : hype and fallacy

    Adriana Placani. Anthropomorphism in AI : hype and fallacy. AI and Ethics , 4(3):691--698, August 2024. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00419-4

    2024 doi

  73. [83]

    Guingrich and Michael S

    Rose E. Guingrich and Michael S. A. Graziano. Ascribing consciousness to artificial intelligence: human- AI interaction and its carry-over effects on human-human interaction. Frontiers in Psychology , 15, March 2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10....

    2024

  74. [84]

    Réglementation et IA en entreprise : ce que vous devez savoir

    L'équipe Hunteed. Réglementation et IA en entreprise : ce que vous devez savoir. https://www.hunteed.com/blog/reglementation-ia-entreprise

  75. [85]

    ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI -based conversational large language models ( LLMs )

    Harry Barton Essel, Dimitrios Vlachopoulos, Albert Benjamin Essuman, and John Opuni Amankwa. ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI -based conversational large language models ( LLMs ). Computers and Education: Artifi...

    2024

  76. [86]

    https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html

    AI principles. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html

  77. [87]

    https://www.oecd.org/en/blogs/2025/02/how-the-g7s-new-ai-reporting-framework-could-shape-the-future-of-ai-governance.html

    OECD AI Policy Observatory Portal . https://www.oecd.org/en/blogs/2025/02/how-the-g7s-new-ai-reporting-framework-could-shape-the-future-of-ai-governance.html

    2025

  78. [88]

    ‘ Hypernudging ’: a threat to moral autonomy? AI and Ethics , 5(2):1121--1131, April 2025

    Isabel Richards. ‘ Hypernudging ’: a threat to moral autonomy? AI and Ethics , 5(2):1121--1131, April 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00449-y

    2025 doi

  79. [89]

    https://www.openglobalrights.org/global/

    Global. https://www.openglobalrights.org/global/

  80. [90]

    Protection constitutionnelle des « neuro-droits » : l'exemple du Chili

    Village de la Justice. Protection constitutionnelle des « neuro-droits » : l'exemple du Chili . Par Nathalie Devillier , Docteur en Droit ., March 2022. https://www.village-justice.com/articles/protection-constitutionnelle-des-neuro-droits-reserve,41539.html

    2022

  81. [91]

    https://pure.eur.nl/files/137206799/ChatGPT\_effects\_on\_cognitive\_skills\_of\_undergraduate\_students.pdf

  82. [92]

    Study finds ChatGPT eases students' cognitive load, but at the expense of critical thinking, September 2024

    Vladimir Hedrih. Study finds ChatGPT eases students' cognitive load, but at the expense of critical thinking, September 2024. https://www.psypost.org/study-finds-chatgpt-eases-students-cognitive-load-but-at-the-expense-of-critical-thinking/

    2024

  83. [93]

    https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/your-brain-on-chatgpt/overview/

    Project Overview ‹ Your Brain on ChatGPT . https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/your-brain-on-chatgpt/overview/

  84. [94]

    Beyond the Bot : ChatGPT 's Influence on Student Learning

    Ahmed Azmi, Ismail Maakip, Peter Voo, Nurul Hudani Mohd Nawi, Dg Norizah Ag Kiflee @ Dzulkifli, Murnizam Halik, Sanen Marshall, and Weı Boon Quah. Beyond the Bot : ChatGPT 's Influence on Student Learning . International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technol...

    2024

  85. [95]

    Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis

    Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez, Carmen Graciela Arbulú Pérez Vargas, Olger Huamaní Jordan, Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros, and Ana Elizabeth Paredes Morales. Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavi...

    2024

  86. [96]

    Education and Information Technologies , April 2025

    Muhammad Abbas. Education and Information Technologies , April 2025. https://www.academia.edu/128703249/Education_and_Information_Technologies

    2025

  87. [97]

    https://www.cnil.fr/fr/definition/algorithme

    Algorithme. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/definition/algorithme

  88. [98]

    https://www.cnil.fr/fr/intelligence-artificielle/glossaire-ia

    Glossaire de l'intelligence artificielle ( IA ) CNIL . https://www.cnil.fr/fr/intelligence-artificielle/glossaire-ia

  89. [99]

    https://www.cnil.fr/fr/definition/big-data

    Big data. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/definition/big-data

  90. [100]

    Wall- E , C - 3PO ou Skynet , que deviendra l’intelligence artificielle entre nos mains?, May 2020

    LICA . Wall- E , C - 3PO ou Skynet , que deviendra l’intelligence artificielle entre nos mains?, May 2020. https://pages.ucsd.edu/ johnson/COGS102B/Hutchins01.pdf

    2020

  91. [101]

    L’ IA : Peut -elle accéder à une forme de conscience? https://www.leaders.com.tn/article/35595-l-ia-peut-elle-acceder-a-une-forme-de-conscience

  92. [102]

    Dualism, 2023

    Howard Robinson. Dualism, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/

    2023

  93. [103]

    https://consc.net/papers/extended.html

    The Extended Mind . https://consc.net/papers/extended.html

  94. [104]

    https://www.lica-europe.org/post/wall-e-c-3po-ou-skynet-que-deviendra-l-intelligence-artificielle-entre-nos-mains

  95. [105]

    https://vitrinelinguistique.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/fiche-gdt/fiche/26501384/infonuagique

    infonuagique. https://vitrinelinguistique.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/fiche-gdt/fiche/26501384/infonuagique

  96. [106]

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasticit

    Plasticité synaptique — Wikipédia . https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasticit

  97. [107]

    https://www.lemagit.fr/definition/Test-de-Turing

    Que signifie Test de Turing ? - Definition IT de LeMagIT . https://www.lemagit.fr/definition/Test-de-Turing

  98. [108]

    Page Version ID: 227204592; https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitement_automatique_des_langues

    Traitement automatique des langues, July 2025. Page Version ID: 227204592; https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitement_automatique_des_langues

    2025

  99. [109]

    Définitions : transhumanisme - Dictionnaire de français Larousse

    Éditions Larousse. Définitions : transhumanisme - Dictionnaire de français Larousse . https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/transhumanisme/188207

  100. [110]

    Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Boston : Harvard Business Review Press

    2018

  101. [111]

    https://cdn.openai.com/better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf

    OECD Legal Instruments . https://cdn.openai.com/better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf

  102. [112]

    Anderson, A. R. (1983). Pensée et machine. Paris : Éditions Champ Vallon

    1983

  103. [113]

    Andler, D. (2023). Intelligence artificielle, intelligence humaine : la double énigme. Paris : Gallimard

    2023

  104. [114]

    Barrat, J. (2013). Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. New York : St. Martin's Press

    2013

  105. [115]

    Bengio, Y., LeCun, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436--444

    2015

  106. [116]

    Bolo, J. (1996). Philosophie contre intelligence artificielle. Saint-Denis : Éditions Lingua Franca

    1996

  107. [117]

    Boss, G. (1987). Les machines à penser : L'homme et l'ordinateur. Toulouse : Éditions du Grand Midi

    1987

  108. [118]

    Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford : Oxford University Press

    2014

  109. [119]

    B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P.,

    Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877--1901

    2020

  110. [120]

    Brenet, D. (2024). L'intelligence artificielle expliquée : des concepts de base aux applications avancées de l'IA. Paris : Éditions ENI

    2024

  111. [121]

    Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York : W. W. Norton

    2014

  112. [122]

    Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York : W. W. Norton

    2010

  113. [123]

    Carr, N. (2014). The Glass Cage: How Our Computers Are Changing Us. New York : W. W. Norton

    2014

  114. [124]

    Cave, S., & Dignum, V. (2019). Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

    2019

  115. [125]

    Changeux, J.-P. (1983). L'homme neuronal. Paris : Odile Jacob

    1983

  116. [126]

    Citton, Y. (2014). Pour une écologie de l'attention. Paris : Seuil

    2014

  117. [127]

    Un plan coordonné dans le domaine de l'intelligence artificielle (COM/2018/795 final)

    Commission européenne (2018). Un plan coordonné dans le domaine de l'intelligence artificielle (COM/2018/795 final). Bruxelles : Commission européenne. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/

    2018

  118. [128]

    https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

    Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI Shaping Europe ’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

  119. [129]

    Comment permettre à l'Homme de garder la main ? Rapport sur les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l'intelligence artificielle

    CNIL (2017, 15 décembre). Comment permettre à l'Homme de garder la main ? Rapport sur les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l'intelligence artificielle. Paris : CNIL. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/comment-permettre-lhomme-de-garder-la-main-rapport-sur-les-enjeux-ethiques-des-algo...

    2017

  120. [130]

    Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York : Pantheon

    2010

  121. [131]

    Dehaene, S. (2020). Apprendre ! Les talents du cerveau, le défi des machines. Paris : Odile Jacob

    2020

  122. [132]

    Dupuy, J.-P. (2009). Au péril de la science : Les sciences cognitives et les repères philosophiques. Paris : Seuil

    2009

  123. [133]

    Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What Computers Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York : Harper & Row

    1972

  124. [134]

    Dreyfus, H. L. (1979). What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press

    1979

  125. [135]

    Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford : Oxford University Press

    2014

  126. [136]

    Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349--379

    2004

  127. [137]

    Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York : Harper

    2014

  128. [138]

    Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York : Harper

    2015

  129. [139]

    Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. New York : Spiegel & Grau

    2018

  130. [140]

    Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York : Basic Books

    1979

  131. [141]

    Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    2011

  132. [142]

    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124--1131

    1974

  133. [143]

    Kelly, K. (2016). The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. New York : Viking

    2016

  134. [144]

    Kurzweil, R. (1990). The Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press

    1990

  135. [145]

    Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York : Viking

    2005

  136. [146]

    Kurzweil, R. (2012). How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. New York : Viking

    2012

  137. [147]

    Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press

    1987

  138. [148]

    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436--444

    2015

  139. [149]

    LeCun, Y. (2023). Quand la machine apprend : Les rouages du deep learning. Paris : Odile Jacob

    2023

  140. [150]

    Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007). Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds and Machines, 17(4), 391--444

    2007

  141. [151]

    Lévy, P. (1994). L'intelligence collective : Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace. Paris : La Découverte

    1994

  142. [152]

    Lanier, J. (2018). Dix arguments pour supprimer vos comptes de réseaux sociaux tout de suite Paris : Éditions du Seuil

    2018

  143. [153]

    Marcus, G. (2019). Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust. New York : Pantheon

    2019

  144. [154]

    McCarthy, J. (2007). What is Artificial Intelligence? http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/

    2007

  145. [155]

    Minsky, M. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York : Simon & Schuster

    1985

  146. [156]

    Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. New York : Knopf

    1995

  147. [157]

    Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence

    OECD (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Paris : OECD Publishing. Disponible sur : https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/27/270649c2-7e69-4f50-bcce-4b8bf08cea78/Ratification\_Instrument\_OECD-LEGAL-0449\_F.pdf

    2019

  148. [158]

    https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/

    Artificial intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/

  149. [159]

    Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York : Penguin

    2011

  150. [160]

    Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics. Oxford : Oxford University Press

    1989

  151. [161]

    Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford : Oxford University Press

    1994

  152. [162]

    Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3e ed.). Prentice Hall

    2010

  153. [163]

    Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: AI and the Problem of Control. New York : Viking

    2019

  154. [164]

    Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417--424

    1980

  155. [165]

    Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85--117

    2015

  156. [166]

    Shannon, C. E. (1950). Programming a computer for playing chess. Philosophical Magazine, 41(314), 256--275

    1950

  157. [167]

    Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3e ed.). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press

    1996

  158. [168]

    Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776--778

    2011

  159. [169]

    Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York : Knopf

    2017

  160. [170]

    Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York : Basic Books

    2011

  161. [171]

    https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_fre

  162. [172]

    Villani, C. (2018). Donner un sens à l'intelligence artificielle : Pour une stratégie nationale et européenne. (Rapport au président de la République). Paris : La Documentation française

    2018

  163. [173]

    Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Paris : Hermann

    1948

  164. [174]

    Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco : W. H. Freeman

    1976

  165. [175]

    Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0

    World Economic Forum (2024). Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0. Cologny (Genève) : WEF. Disponible sur : https://www.weforum.org/reports/shaping-the-future-of-learning-the-role-of-ai-in-education-4-0

    2024

  166. [176]

    https://www.cnil.fr/fr/comment-permettre-lhomme-de-garder-la-main-rapport-sur-les-enjeux-ethiques-des-algorithmes-et-de

    Comment permettre à l’ Homme de garder la main ? Rapport sur les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l’intelligence artificielle. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/comment-permettre-lhomme-de-garder-la-main-rapport-sur-les-enjeux-ethiques-des-algorithmes-et-de

  167. [177]

    https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7717-0397

    ORCID Rénald Gesnot . https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7717-0397

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.