Segmentation and Classification of Pap Smear Images for Cervical Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning
read the original abstract
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Early detection through Pap smear tests is essential to reduce mortality rates; however, the manual examination is time consuming and prone to human error. This study proposes a deep learning framework that integrates U-Net for segmentation and a classification model to enhance diagnostic performance. The Herlev Pap Smear Dataset, a publicly available cervical cell dataset, was utilized for training and evaluation. The impact of segmentation on classification performance was evaluated by comparing the model trained on segmented images and another trained on non-segmented images. Experimental results showed that the use of segmented images marginally improved the model performance on precision (about 0.41 percent higher) and F1-score (about 1.30 percent higher), which suggests a slightly more balanced classification performance. While segmentation helps in feature extraction, the results showed that its impact on classification performance appears to be limited. The proposed framework offers a supplemental tool for clinical applications, which may aid pathologists in early diagnosis.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Systematic Evaluation of Vision Transformers for Automated Cervical Cancer Classification: Optimization, Statistical Validation, and Clinical Interpretability
Vision Transformer optimized on Herlev dataset reaches 94.9-95.2% accuracy in cervical cell classification with Grad-CAM attention aligning to nuclear and chromatin features.
-
A Leakage-Aware Comparative Benchmark of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Transformer Models for Reliable Leukemia Detection
Subject-disjoint evaluation on C-NMC 2019 reduces AUROC by about 0.04 versus random splits, with EfficientNet-B1 reaching 0.913 AUROC, 0.87 sensitivity, and 0.80 specificity under honest conditions with calibration as...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.