Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 218 references

A Scenario-Oriented Survey of Federated Recommender Systems: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A scenario-oriented survey of federated recommender systems argues that the field should be organized by recommendation scenario rather than by federated-learning architecture.

desk verdict A useful, honest FedRec survey with a genuinely new scenario-oriented frame, but the frame is asserted rather than established and one causal claim in the abstract is unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19620 v1 pith:L5UXNT6U submitted 2025-08-27 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CR

Yunqi Mi , Jiakui Shen , Guoshuai Zhao , Jialie Shen , Xueming Qian This is my paper
classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CR
keywords federatedrecommendersystemslearningprivacy-preservingrecommendationscenario-orientedtaxonomycollaborativeFedReccross-domainmulti-modalLLM-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey makes a framing claim: previous reviews treat federated recommender systems as a federated-learning task, and by doing so they miss the problems created by the recommendation scenario itself. The authors organize the field into four deployment scenarios—collaborative, cross-domain, multi-modal, and LLM-based FedRec—and show that each has its own source of difficulty, such as label drift between platforms in cross-domain settings that exists before any federated architecture is added. The reason to care is deployment: scenario-specific problems need scenario-specific solutions, and generic FL fixes will not get systems into production. The paper's contribution is the taxonomy, the scenario-by-scenario analysis of techniques and open challenges, and the resulting guidance for practitioners.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the four-scenario taxonomy presented in Table I, built on the observation that FedRec data naturally lives on distributed clients—a coupling inherited from recommendation rather than imposed by federated learning. Each row of the taxonomy pairs a scenario with its core mechanism and a concrete use case: collaborative FedRec (pseudo-item sampling, parameter aggregation, attacks and defenses), cross-domain FedRec (representation alignment across user-, item-, or content-level relevance), multi-modal FedRec (aligning modal features with ID embeddings on server or clients), and LLM-based FedRec (fine-tuning intrinsic or extrinsic LLM parameters). Underneath, the paper formal

What would settle it

Index every FedRec paper through early 2025 and ask independent coders to assign each to exactly one of the four scenarios. If a substantial share (say, over 10%) falls outside the four categories or cannot be uniquely assigned, the taxonomy does not cleanly cut the research space as claimed. A complementary check: give practitioners two alternative organizations of the same literature—scenario-based and FL-architecture-based—and see which one leads to faster, better-grounded design choices for a concrete deployment problem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is that existing FedRec surveys 'treat FedRec as a machine learning task' and hence 'their utility drops by ignoring specific recommendation scenarios' unique characteristics and practical challenges.' The authors argue that the main difficulty in federated recommendation is not the FL architecture itself but the recommendation scenario: for example, statistical heterogeneity in cross-domain FedRec comes from label drift between platforms, which the recommender itself produces, not from federated training. On this basis the survey organizes the field into four scenarios—collaborative FedRec, cross-domain FedRec, multi-modal FedRec, and LLM-based FedRec—and for e

Load-bearing premise

The four-scenario taxonomy (collaborative, cross-domain, multi-modal, LLM-based) actually divides FedRec research and practice in the most useful way; the paper gives no criteria proving these categories are complete or non-overlapping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Research effort should shift toward context-enhanced scenarios: the paper reports that roughly 70% of recent FedRec publications concern collaborative FedRec, while the harder deployment problems are concentrated in cross-domain, multi-modal, and LLM-based settings.
  • Cross-domain FedRec must address overlapping-user leakage, pseudo-interaction noise, and cross-domain sequence modeling before real deployment becomes viable.
  • Multi-modal FedRec should place feature alignment on the server or on clients according to device capacity and downstream task, rather than defaulting to one side.
  • LLM-based FedRec needs resource-efficient cross-device adaptation—lightweight adapters or external LLM services—because personal devices cannot fine-tune large models locally.
  • A unified, scenario-aware benchmark with standardized data splits and metrics is needed for fair comparison across accuracy, resource consumption, fairness, and explainability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scenario-first framing is adopted, evaluation practice should diversify: a cross-domain FedRec that fixes platform label drift may be valuable even without improving top-rank accuracy on a single benchmark, because the survey's own examples imply deployment value beyond accuracy.
  • The four categories are not obviously closed: sequential and session-based recommendation and explainable recommendation appear as cross-cutting themes in the open problems, suggesting the taxonomy could grow or be re-cut along those axes.
  • A practitioner-facing decision tree could be built from the survey's tables: map client type (individual device versus platform), heterogeneity source (label drift versus interaction sparsity), and modality overlap to a shortlist of mechanisms—an operationalization the paper does not provide.
  • The claim that cross-domain label drift originates in the recommender rather than the FL architecture implies a targeted validation: reproduce the same cross-domain drift in a centralized recommender and show that adding federated aggregation does not change its character.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a survey of federated recommender systems (FedRec) organized around four application scenarios: collaborative FedRec, cross-domain FedRec, multi-modal FedRec, and LLM-based FedRec. It argues that prior surveys treat FedRec as a generic federated learning task and therefore miss scenario-specific challenges; the proposed taxonomy is intended to provide a clearer link between recommendation scenarios and FL frameworks for practitioners. The paper reviews techniques in each scenario (e.g., privacy preservation, model inconsistency, client participation, high-order interactions, attack/defense for collaborative FedRec; alignment strategies for cross-domain and multi-modal FedRec; parameter-efficient fine-tuning for LLM-based FedRec), summarizes datasets and evaluation metrics, and discusses cross-cutting challenges such as trustworthiness, efficient training, user-governed learning, unified benchmarks, online learning, and attack/defense. A continuously updated repository is announced.

Significance. If the scenario-oriented framing is accepted, the survey fills a real gap: prior reviews emphasized FL-centric abstractions (horizontal/vertical, personalization, communication cost), while this paper foregrounds recommendation-specific deployment issues. Its strengths include broad coverage of recent work (including 2024–2025 papers), a useful dataset table with official links, a metric table, scenario-specific challenge sections, and concrete future directions. The paper also explicitly acknowledges its own limitations in Section VIII, which is commendable. However, the central contribution—the four-scenario taxonomy—is asserted rather than justified, and the causal motivating claim about label drift is unsupported. These issues affect the paper's main thesis and need to be addressed before the survey can serve as a reliable organizing framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section I-A, Table I, Fig. 2(b)] The four-scenario taxonomy is the paper's central organizing device, but no criteria are given for choosing these categories or for showing that they are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. Collaborative FedRec is defined by a recommendation paradigm, while cross-domain, multi-modal, and LLM-based FedRec are defined by context type; these are not orthogonal. The paper's own examples illustrate the overlap: P2M2-CDR [91] is placed under Multi-modal FedRec (Section IV-B) but is described as 'user-concerned federated cross-domain recommendation'; FedMR [92] uses a server-side foundation model to extract item features, placing it adjacent to the LLM-based scenario. Fig. 2(b) also includes an undefined 'Others' category. Please either define a principled partition (with inclusion/exclusion criteria) or explicitly reframe the organization as thematic rather than taxonomic; otherwise the claimed
  2. [Abstract and Section I-A] The statement that statistical heterogeneity in cross-domain FedRec is 'mainly caused by the recommender itself, but not the federated architecture' is a strong causal claim with no supporting evidence. Cross-domain label drift is inherent to the domains/platforms and to differences in user populations; the recommender may amplify it, but no comparison or citation is provided. Since this claim is used to motivate the entire scenario-oriented perspective, please either substantiate it (e.g., with empirical evidence from the cited CDR/FedRec papers) or weaken it to a hypothesis about where the heterogeneity originates.
  3. [Section VIII (Limitations) and Section I-A] The paper describes itself as a systematic review, but no selection protocol is given: there is no description of search sources, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening procedure. Section VIII acknowledges that only 'some key scenarios' are covered and that the time window ends in early 2025, but without knowing how the ~100 cited papers were chosen, the reader cannot assess coverage bias. Table I's mechanism column also aggregates many methods under a single generic description, which obscures the diversity of approaches within each scenario. Please add a methodology paragraph or explicitly label the review as selective and illustrative rather than systematic.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Algorithm 1 and Section II] Typos/inconsistencies: 'debuts' should likely be 'first participates' or 'is new to training'; 'FedA VG' should be 'FedAVG'; 'FedRec' is capitalized inconsistently ('Fedrec' appears throughout).
  2. [Fig. 2(a)] The label 'TBC.' on the time axis is undefined. If it indicates that 2025 is a partial year, please say so explicitly.
  3. [Table III] The notation is confusing: K is first defined as list length, then as a ranked list, and Kp as a subset of that ranked list. The formulas mix these meanings (e.g., Precision@K = |Kp|/K). The function 1(k) is defined but not used. Please introduce separate symbols (e.g., L for list length, R for ranked list) and remove unused definitions.
  4. [Section IV-C and References] Minor language issues: 'LLM-based faces' should be 'LLM-based FedRec faces'; reference [75] uses 'NeuIPS' instead of 'NeurIPS'; reference [81] lists 'FTL-IJCAI' as a venue, which is unconventional and should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Survey is self-contained and non-circular; the scenario taxonomy is asserted rather than derived, but no claim reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey paper: its contribution is organizational (a four-scenario taxonomy and scenario-wise summaries of existing FedRec work), not a derivation or prediction from fitted parameters. The central claim in Section I-A that prior reviews lose utility by treating FedRec as a generic FL task, and that scenario-oriented organization helps deployment, is a critical-position argument; it does not reduce to the paper's own outputs. The taxonomy in Section I-A/Table I is asserted rather than proven: no criteria, completeness, or disjointness argument is given, and Section VIII admits only 'an overview of some key FedRec scenarios' is covered. That is a support/validity limitation, not circularity. The only identifiable author self-citation is [4] (J. Shen et al., SIGIR 2013), used for the background sentence that recommender systems rely on user data including behavioral records and attributes; this is non-load-bearing and independently standard. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no equation is defined in terms of its own conclusion. Under the hard rules, the absence of a quoted reduction means no circularity step is established; the score reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing author citation and the asserted, non-derived taxonomy.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey's claims depend on the correctness of its taxonomy and on comparative judgments about prior work, both stated without empirical support. No free parameters or invented entities apply; the axioms listed are the load-bearing domain assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The four-scenario taxonomy (collaborative, cross-domain, multi-modal, LLM-based) captures the practically important dimensions of FedRec deployment.
    The entire survey's structure and 'practical perspective' claim rest on this categorization being the right one. It is asserted in Section I and Table I without a derivation from deployment requirements.
  • domain assumption Existing FedRec surveys approach the topic from an FL-systems perspective and neglect scenario-specific challenges.
    Stated in the Abstract and Section I-A as the gap this survey fills; it is a comparative judgment about prior surveys [97], [5], [98], [99], [100] and is not empirically demonstrated.
  • domain assumption The label drift between platforms in cross-domain FedRec is mainly caused by the recommender itself, not the federated architecture.
    Abstract and Section I; presented as motivation without citation or formal argument. If false, the paper's central motivation weakens.
  • domain assumption Coverage of venues (WWW, KDD, SIGIR, ICLR, IJCAI, NeurIPS, AAAI, TOIS, TKDE, arXiv) up to early 2025 is representative of the FedRec literature.
    Section VIII (Limitations) discloses this scope; the survey's completeness claims depend on this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Scenario-Oriented Survey of Federated Recommender Systems: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L5UXNT6U

@misc{pith2026250819620,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Scenario-Oriented Survey of Federated Recommender Systems: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L5UXNT6U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19620}
}
read the original abstract

Extending recommender systems to federated learning (FL) frameworks to protect the privacy of users or platforms while making recommendations has recently gained widespread attention in academia. This is due to the natural coupling of recommender systems and federated learning architectures: the data originates from distributed clients (mostly mobile devices held by users), which are highly related to privacy. In a centralized recommender system (CenRec), the central server collects clients' data, trains the model, and provides the service. Whereas in federated recommender systems (FedRec), the step of data collecting is omitted, and the step of model training is offloaded to each client. The server only aggregates the model and other knowledge, thus avoiding client privacy leakage. Some surveys of federated recommender systems discuss and analyze related work from the perspective of designing FL systems. However, their utility drops by ignoring specific recommendation scenarios' unique characteristics and practical challenges. For example, the statistical heterogeneity issue in cross-domain FedRec originates from the label drift of the data held by different platforms, which is mainly caused by the recommender itself, but not the federated architecture. Therefore, it should focus more on solving specific problems in real-world recommendation scenarios to encourage the deployment FedRec. To this end, this review comprehensively analyzes the coupling of recommender systems and federated learning from the perspective of recommendation researchers and practitioners. We establish a clear link between recommendation scenarios and FL frameworks, systematically analyzing scenario-specific approaches, practical challenges, and potential opportunities. We aim to develop guidance for the real-world deployment of FedRec, bridging the gap between existing research and applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19620 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FedRec can be considered as a CenRec that offloads model training to the client and omits the data collection process. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The historical trend of FedRec publications from 2019 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Collaborative Federated Recommendation. the individual client. Consequently, FedRec processes D ≜ S i∈N Di , which means the universal dataset D consists of local datasets on each client. In FedRec, the client may represent either the individual user or the recommendation platform/corporation, depending on different levels of protec￾tion requirements. In the cross-user scenario [100], each client manages the interac… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Commonalities and differences of FedRec between the collaborative and context-enhanced scenarios. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross-domain federated recommender systems of three different frameworks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Multi-modal federated recommender systems of two different frameworks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Different federated LLM-based recommendation architectures. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

218 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [91]

    A privacy-preserving framework with multi-modal data for cross-domain recommendation,

    L. Wang, L. Sang, Q. Zhang, Q. Wu, and M. Xu, “A privacy-preserving framework with multi-modal data for cross-domain recommendation,” KBS, 2024

    2024

  2. [92]

    Personalized item em- beddings in federated multimodal recommendation,

    Z. Li, G. Long, J. Jiang, and C. Zhang, “Personalized item em- beddings in federated multimodal recommendation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08478, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Improved diversity-promoting collaborative metric learning for recommendation,

    S. Bao, Q. Xu, Z. Yang, Y . He, X. Cao, and Q. Huang, “Improved diversity-promoting collaborative metric learning for recommendation,” TPAMI, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Multimedia recommendation: technology and techniques,

    J. Shen, M. Wang, S. Yan, and P. Cui, “Multimedia recommendation: technology and techniques,” in SIGIR, 2013

    2013

  5. [5]

    A survey on federated recommendation systems,

    Z. Sun, Y . Xu, Y . Liu, W. He, L. Kong, F. Wu, Y . Jiang, and L. Cui, “A survey on federated recommendation systems,” TNNLS, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Hetefedrec: Federated recommender systems with model heterogeneity,

    W. Yuan, L. Qu, L. Cui, Y . Tong, X. Zhou, and H. Yin, “Hetefedrec: Federated recommender systems with model heterogeneity,” in ICDE, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    No prejudice! fair federated graph neural networks for personalized recommendation,

    N. Agrawal, A. K. Sirohi, S. Kumar et al., “No prejudice! fair federated graph neural networks for personalized recommendation,” in AAAI, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Refrs: Resource-efficient federated recommender system for dynamic and diversified user preferences,

    M. Imran, H. Yin, T. Chen, Q. V . H. Nguyen, A. Zhou, and K. Zheng, “Refrs: Resource-efficient federated recommender system for dynamic and diversified user preferences,” TOIS, 2023

    2023

Show all 218 references
  1. [9]

    Meta matrix factorization for federated rating predictions,

    Y . Lin, P. Ren, Z. Chen, Z. Ren, D. Yu, J. Ma, M. d. Rijke, and X. Cheng, “Meta matrix factorization for federated rating predictions,” in SIGIR, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    When federated recommendation meets cold-start problem: Separating item attributes and user interactions,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, T. Zhou, Z. Zhang, P. Yan, and B. Yang, “When federated recommendation meets cold-start problem: Separating item attributes and user interactions,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Federated recommendation with additive personalization,

    Z. Li, G. Long, and T. Zhou, “Federated recommendation with additive personalization,” in ICLR, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Dual personalization on federated recommendation,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, T. Zhou, P. Yan, Z. Zhang, C. Zhang, and B. Yang, “Dual personalization on federated recommendation,” in IJCAI, 2023. 17

    2023

  5. [13]

    Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommendation,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, T. Zhou, Z. Zhang, P. Yan, and B. Yang, “Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommendation,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Federated collaborative filtering for privacy-preserving personalized recommendation system,

    M. Ammad-Ud-Din, E. Ivannikova, S. A. Khan, W. Oyomno, Q. Fu, K. E. Tan, and A. Flanagan, “Federated collaborative filtering for privacy-preserving personalized recommendation system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09888, 2019

    1901 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Secure federated matrix factorization,

    D. Chai, L. Wang, K. Chen, and Q. Yang, “Secure federated matrix factorization,” IEEE Intell. Syst , 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Semi-decentralized federated ego graph learning for recommendation,

    L. Qu, N. Tang, R. Zheng, Q. V . H. Nguyen, Z. Huang, Y . Shi, and H. Yin, “Semi-decentralized federated ego graph learning for recommendation,” in WWW, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    A federated graph neural network framework for privacy-preserving personalization,

    C. Wu, F. Wu, L. Lyu, T. Qi, Y . Huang, and X. Xie, “A federated graph neural network framework for privacy-preserving personalization,” Nature Communications, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Fedrec: Federated recommen- dation with explicit feedback,

    G. Lin, F. Liang, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Fedrec: Federated recommen- dation with explicit feedback,” IEEE Intell. Syst , 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Fedrec++: Lossless federated recom- mendation with explicit feedback,

    F. Liang, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Fedrec++: Lossless federated recom- mendation with explicit feedback,” in AAAI, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Stronger privacy for federated collaborative filtering with implicit feedback,

    L. Minto, M. Haller, B. Livshits, and H. Haddadi, “Stronger privacy for federated collaborative filtering with implicit feedback,” in RecSys, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Fr-fmss: Federated recommendation via fake marks and secret sharing,

    Z. Lin, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Fr-fmss: Federated recommendation via fake marks and secret sharing,” in RecSys, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Federated neural collaborative filtering,

    V . Perifanis and P. S. Efraimidis, “Federated neural collaborative filtering,” KBS, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Hfsa: A semi-asynchronous hierarchical federated recommendation system in smart city,

    Y . Li, H. Yu, Y . Zeng, and Q. Pan, “Hfsa: A semi-asynchronous hierarchical federated recommendation system in smart city,” IOTJ, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Marking the pace: A blockchain-enhanced privacy-traceable strategy for federated recom- mender systems,

    Z. Cai, T. Tang, S. Yu, Y . Xiao, and F. Xia, “Marking the pace: A blockchain-enhanced privacy-traceable strategy for federated recom- mender systems,” IOTJ, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hn3s: A federated autoencoder framework for collaborative filtering via hybrid negative sampling and secret sharing,

    L. Zhang, G. Li, L. Yuan, X. Ding, and Q. Rong, “Hn3s: A federated autoencoder framework for collaborative filtering via hybrid negative sampling and secret sharing,” IPM, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Federated unlearning for on-device recommendation,

    W. Yuan, H. Yin, F. Wu, S. Zhang, T. He, and H. Wang, “Federated unlearning for on-device recommendation,” in WSDM, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Efficient federated item similarity model for privacy-preserving recommendation,

    X. Ding, G. Li, L. Yuan, L. Zhang, and Q. Rong, “Efficient federated item similarity model for privacy-preserving recommendation,” IPM, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Fast-adapting and privacy-preserving federated recommender system,

    Q. Wang, H. Yin, T. Chen, J. Yu, A. Zhou, and X. Zhang, “Fast-adapting and privacy-preserving federated recommender system,” VLDB, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Privacy-preserving sequential recommendation with collaborative confusion,

    W. Wang, Y . Lin, P. Ren, Z. Chen, T. Mine, J. Zhao, Q. Zhao, M. Zhang, X. Ben, and Y . Li, “Privacy-preserving sequential recommendation with collaborative confusion,” TOIS, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Certified unlearning for federated recommendation,

    T. T. Huynh, T. B. Nguyen, T. T. Nguyen, P. L. Nguyen, H. Yin, Q. V . H. Nguyen, and T. T. Nguyen, “Certified unlearning for federated recommendation,” TOIS, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Federated recommender system based on diffusion augmentation and guided denoising,

    Y . Di, H. Shi, X. Wang, R. Ma, and Y . Liu, “Federated recommender system based on diffusion augmentation and guided denoising,” TOIS, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Ownership verification for federated recommendation,

    E. Yang, W. Pan, L. Fan, H. Gu, Z. Li, Q. Yang, and Z. Ming, “Ownership verification for federated recommendation,” TOIS, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Fedfast: Going beyond average for faster training of federated recommender systems,

    K. Muhammad, Q. Wang, D. O’Reilly-Morgan, E. Tragos, B. Smyth, N. Hurley, J. Geraci, and A. Lawlor, “Fedfast: Going beyond average for faster training of federated recommender systems,” in KDD, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Privacy-preserving news recommendation model learning,

    T. Qi, F. Wu, C. Wu, Y . Huang, and X. Xie, “Privacy-preserving news recommendation model learning,” in EMNLP Findings, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Towards fair federated recommendation learning: Characterizing the inter-dependence of system and data heterogeneity,

    K. Maeng, H. Lu, L. Melis, J. Nguyen, M. Rabbat, and C.-J. Wu, “Towards fair federated recommendation learning: Characterizing the inter-dependence of system and data heterogeneity,” in RecSys, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Personalized federated recommendation via joint representation learning, user clustering, and model adaptation,

    S. Luo, Y . Xiao, and L. Song, “Personalized federated recommendation via joint representation learning, user clustering, and model adaptation,” in CIKM, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Perfe- drec++: Enhancing personalized federated recommendation with self- supervised pre-training,

    S. Luo, Y . Xiao, X. Zhang, Y . Liu, W. Ding, and L. Song, “Perfe- drec++: Enhancing personalized federated recommendation with self- supervised pre-training,” TIST, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Fine-grained preference-aware personalized federated poi recommendation with data sparsity,

    X. Zhang, Z. Ye, J. Lu, F. Zhuang, Y . Zheng, and D. Yu, “Fine-grained preference-aware personalized federated poi recommendation with data sparsity,” in SIGIR, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Cluster-driven personalized federated recommendation with interest-aware graph convolution network for multimedia,

    X. Mao, Y . Liu, L. Qi, L. Duan, X. Xu, X. Zhang, W. Dou, A. Beheshti, and X. Zhou, “Cluster-driven personalized federated recommendation with interest-aware graph convolution network for multimedia,” in ACM MM, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    A payload optimization method for federated recommender systems,

    F. K. Khan, A. Flanagan, K. E. Tan, Z. Alamgir, and M. Ammad- Ud-Din, “A payload optimization method for federated recommender systems,” in RecSys, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Towards efficient communication and secure federated recommendation system via low-rank training,

    N.-H. Nguyen, T.-A. Nguyen, T. Nguyen, V . T. Hoang, D. D. Le, and K.-S. Wong, “Towards efficient communication and secure federated recommendation system via low-rank training,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    P4gcn: Vertical federated social recommendation with privacy-preserving two-party graph convolution network,

    Z. Wang, W. Wang, Y . Huang, Z. Peng, Z. Yang, M. Yao, C. Wang, and X. Fan, “P4gcn: Vertical federated social recommendation with privacy-preserving two-party graph convolution network,” in WWW, 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    Lightfr: Lightweight fed- erated recommendation with privacy-preserving matrix factorization,

    H. Zhang, F. Luo, J. Wu, X. He, and Y . Li, “Lightfr: Lightweight fed- erated recommendation with privacy-preserving matrix factorization,” TOIS, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Discrete federated multi- behavior recommendation for privacy-preserving heterogeneous one- class collaborative filtering,

    E. Yang, W. Pan, Q. Yang, and Z. Ming, “Discrete federated multi- behavior recommendation for privacy-preserving heterogeneous one- class collaborative filtering,” TOIS, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Efficient-fedrec: Efficient federated learning framework for privacy-preserving news recommendation,

    J. Yi, F. Wu, C. Wu, R. Liu, G. Sun, and X. Xie, “Efficient-fedrec: Efficient federated learning framework for privacy-preserving news recommendation,” in EMNLP, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Hide your model: A parameter transmission-free federated recommender system,

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, L. Qu, Q. V . H. Nguyen, J. Li, and H. Yin, “Hide your model: A parameter transmission-free federated recommender system,” in ICDE, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Personalized federated recommendation for cold-start users via adap- tive knowledge fusion,

    Y . Li, Y . Shan, Y . LIU, H. Wang, wangshi.ww, Y . Wang, and R. Li, “Personalized federated recommendation for cold-start users via adap- tive knowledge fusion,” in WWW, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Privacy- preserving graph convolution network for federated item recommenda- tion,

    P. Hu, Z. Lin, W. Pan, Q. Yang, X. Peng, and Z. Ming, “Privacy- preserving graph convolution network for federated item recommenda- tion,” Artificial Intelligence, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Vertical federated graph neural network for recommender system,

    P. Mai and Y . Pang, “Vertical federated graph neural network for recommender system,” in ICML, 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Towards personalized privacy: User-governed data contribution for federated recommendation,

    L. Qu, W. Yuan, R. Zheng, L. Cui, Y . Shi, and H. Yin, “Towards personalized privacy: User-governed data contribution for federated recommendation,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,

    B. Yan, Y . Cao, H. Wang, W. Yang, J. Du, and C. Shi, “Federated heterogeneous graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommen- dation,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Defedgcn: Privacy-preserving decentralized federated gcn for recommender sys- tem,

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, M. Yan, H. Yan, X. Lin, and J. Zhou, “Defedgcn: Privacy-preserving decentralized federated gcn for recommender sys- tem,” TSC, 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    Poisoning deep learning based recom- mender model in federated learning scenarios,

    D. Rong, Q. He, and J. Chen, “Poisoning deep learning based recom- mender model in federated learning scenarios,” in IJCAI, 2022

    2022

  46. [55]

    Fedattack: Effective and covert poisoning attack on federated recommendation via hard sampling,

    C. Wu, F. Wu, T. Qi, Y . Huang, and X. Xie, “Fedattack: Effective and covert poisoning attack on federated recommendation via hard sampling,” in KDD, 2022

    2022

  47. [56]

    Pipattack: Poisoning federated recommender systems for manipulating item promotion,

    S. Zhang, H. Yin, T. Chen, Z. Huang, Q. V . H. Nguyen, and L. Cui, “Pipattack: Poisoning federated recommender systems for manipulating item promotion,” in WSDM, 2022

    2022

  48. [57]

    Ua-fedrec: untargeted attack on federated news recommendation,

    J. Yi, F. Wu, B. Zhu, J. Yao, Z. Tao, G. Sun, and X. Xie, “Ua-fedrec: untargeted attack on federated news recommendation,” in KDD, 2023

    2023

  49. [58]

    Untargeted attack against federated recommendation systems via poisonous item embeddings and the defense,

    Y . Yu, Q. Liu, L. Wu, R. Yu, S. L. Yu, and Z. Zhang, “Untargeted attack against federated recommendation systems via poisonous item embeddings and the defense,” in AAAI, 2023

    2023

  50. [59]

    Interaction-level membership inference attack against federated rec- ommender systems,

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, Q. V . H. Nguyen, L. Cui, T. He, and H. Yin, “Interaction-level membership inference attack against federated rec- ommender systems,” in WWW, 2023

    2023

  51. [60]

    Comprehensive privacy analysis on federated recommender system against attribute inference attacks,

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, and H. Yin, “Comprehensive privacy analysis on federated recommender system against attribute inference attacks,” TKDE, 2023

    2023

  52. [61]

    Not one less: Exploring interplay between user profiles and items in untargeted attacks against federated recommendation,

    Y . Hao, X. Chen, X. Lyu, J. Liu, Y . Zhu, Z. Wan, S. Mauw, and W. Wang, “Not one less: Exploring interplay between user profiles and items in untargeted attacks against federated recommendation,” in CCS, 2024

    2024

  53. [62]

    Eyes on federated recommendation: Targeted poisoning with compe- tition and its mitigation,

    Y . Hao, X. Chen, W. Wang, J. Liu, T. Li, J. Wang, and W. Pedrycz, “Eyes on federated recommendation: Targeted poisoning with compe- tition and its mitigation,” TIFS, 2024

    2024

  54. [63]

    User consented federated recommender system against personalized attribute inference attack,

    Q. Hu and Y . Song, “User consented federated recommender system against personalized attribute inference attack,” in WSDM, 2024

    2024

  55. [64]

    Defending against membership inference attack for counterfactual federated recommendation with differentially private representation learning,

    X. Liu, Y . Chen, and S. Pang, “Defending against membership inference attack for counterfactual federated recommendation with differentially private representation learning,” TIFS, 2024

    2024

  56. [65]

    Poisoning federated recommender systems with fake users,

    M. Yin, Y . Xu, M. Fang, and N. Z. Gong, “Poisoning federated recommender systems with fake users,” in WWW, 2024. 18

    2024

  57. [66]

    Preventing the popular item embedding based attack in federated recommenda- tions,

    J. Zhang, H. Li, D. Rong, Y . Zhao, K. Chen, and L. Shou, “Preventing the popular item embedding based attack in federated recommenda- tions,” in ICDE, 2024

    2024

  58. [67]

    Poisoning decentralized collaborative recommender system and its countermea- sures,

    R. Zheng, L. Qu, T. Chen, K. Zheng, Y . Shi, and H. Yin, “Poisoning decentralized collaborative recommender system and its countermea- sures,” in SIGIR, 2024

    2024

  59. [68]

    Hidattack: An effective and undetectable model poisoning attack to federated recommenders,

    W. Ali, K. Umer, X. Zhou, and J. Shao, “Hidattack: An effective and undetectable model poisoning attack to federated recommenders,” TKDE, 2024

    2024

  60. [69]

    Defending federated recommender systems against untargeted attacks: A contribution-aware robust aggregation scheme,

    R. Liang, Y . Jiang, F. Zhu, L. Cheng, and H. Liu, “Defending federated recommender systems against untargeted attacks: A contribution-aware robust aggregation scheme,” TKDD, 2025

    2025

  61. [70]

    Aegis: Post-training attribute unlearning in federated recommender systems against attribute inference attacks,

    W. Wu, J. Jiang, and C. Hu, “Aegis: Post-training attribute unlearning in federated recommender systems against attribute inference attacks,” in WWW, 2025

    2025

  62. [72]

    Fedcdr: federated cross-domain recommendation for privacy- preserving rating prediction,

    W. Meihan, L. Li, C. Tao, E. Rigall, W. Xiaodong, and X. Cheng- Zhong, “Fedcdr: federated cross-domain recommendation for privacy- preserving rating prediction,” in CIKM, 2022

    2022

  63. [73]

    Fedcore: Federated learning for cross-organization recommendation ecosystem,

    Z. Li, X. Wu, W. Pan, Y . Ding, Z. Wu, S. Tan, Q. Xu, Q. Yang, and Z. Ming, “Fedcore: Federated learning for cross-organization recommendation ecosystem,” TKDE, 2024

    2024

  64. [74]

    Ppgencdr: A stable and robust framework for privacy-preserving cross-domain recommen- dation,

    X. Liao, W. Liu, X. Zheng, B. Yao, and C. Chen, “Ppgencdr: A stable and robust framework for privacy-preserving cross-domain recommen- dation,” in AAAI, 2023

    2023

  65. [75]

    Federated graph learning for cross-domain recommendation,

    Z. Yang, Z. Peng, Z. Wang, J. Qi, C. Chen, W. Pan, C. Wen, C. Wang, and X. Fan, “Federated graph learning for cross-domain recommendation,” NeuIPS, 2024

    2024

  66. [76]

    Privacy-preserving cross-domain se- quential recommendation,

    Z. Lin, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Privacy-preserving cross-domain se- quential recommendation,” in ICDM, 2023

    2023

  67. [77]

    Fedct: Federated collaborative transfer for recommendation,

    S. Liu, S. Xu, W. Yu, Z. Fu, Y . Zhang, and A. Marian, “Fedct: Federated collaborative transfer for recommendation,” in SIGIR, 2021

    2021

  68. [78]

    Feder- ated probabilistic preference distribution modelling with compactness co-clustering for privacy-preserving multi-domain recommendation

    W. Liu, C. Chen, X. Liao, M. Hu, J. Yin, Y . Tan, and L. Zheng, “Feder- ated probabilistic preference distribution modelling with compactness co-clustering for privacy-preserving multi-domain recommendation.” in IJCAI, 2023

    2023

  69. [79]

    Differential private knowledge transfer for privacy-preserving cross-domain recom- mendation,

    C. Chen, H. Wu, J. Su, L. Lyu, X. Zheng, and L. Wang, “Differential private knowledge transfer for privacy-preserving cross-domain recom- mendation,” in WWW, 2022

    2022

  70. [80]

    Differentially private sparse mapping for privacy-preserving cross domain recommendation,

    W. Liu, X. Zheng, C. Chen, M. Hu, X. Liao, F. Wang, Y . Tan, D. Meng, and J. Wang, “Differentially private sparse mapping for privacy-preserving cross domain recommendation,” in ACM MM, 2023

    2023

  71. [81]

    A federated multi-view deep learning framework for privacy-preserving recommendations,

    M. Huang, H. Li, B. Bai, C. Wang, K. Bai, and F. Wang, “A federated multi-view deep learning framework for privacy-preserving recommendations,” FTL-IJCAI, 2021

    2021

  72. [82]

    Refer: Retrieval-enhanced vertical federated recommendation for full set user benefit,

    W. Li, Z. Wang, J. Wang, S.-T. Xia, J. Zhu, M. Chen, J. Fan, J. Cheng, and J. Lei, “Refer: Retrieval-enhanced vertical federated recommendation for full set user benefit,” in SIGIR, 2024

    2024

  73. [83]

    Feddcsr: Federated cross-domain sequential recommendation via disentangled representation learning,

    H. Zhang, D. Zheng, X. Yang, J. Feng, and Q. Liao, “Feddcsr: Federated cross-domain sequential recommendation via disentangled representation learning,” in SDM, 2024

    2024

  74. [84]

    Fedhcdr: Federated cross-domain recommendation with hypergraph signal decoupling,

    H. Zhang, D. Zheng, L. Zhong, X. Yang, J. Feng, Y . Feng, and Q. Liao, “Fedhcdr: Federated cross-domain recommendation with hypergraph signal decoupling,” in ECML PKDD, 2024

    2024

  75. [85]

    Win-win: a privacy-preserving federated framework for dual-target cross-domain recommendation,

    G. Chen, X. Zhang, Y . Su, Y . Lai, J. Xiang, J. Zhang, and Y . Zheng, “Win-win: a privacy-preserving federated framework for dual-target cross-domain recommendation,” in AAAI, 2023

    2023

  76. [86]

    Fedcsr: A federated framework for multi-platform cross-domain sequential recommendation with dual contrastive learning,

    D. Zheng, H. Zhang, J. Zhai, L. Zhong, L. Wang, J. Feng, X. Liao, Y . Tian, N. Xiao, and Q. Liao, “Fedcsr: A federated framework for multi-platform cross-domain sequential recommendation with dual contrastive learning,” in COLING, 2025

    2025

  77. [87]

    Privacy-preserving cross-domain recommendation with federated graph learning,

    C. Tian, Y . Xie, X. Chen, Y . Li, and X. Zhao, “Privacy-preserving cross-domain recommendation with federated graph learning,” TOIS, 2024

    2024

  78. [88]

    Prompt- enhanced federated content representation learning for cross-domain recommendation,

    L. Guo, Z. Lu, J. Yu, Q. V . H. Nguyen, and H. Yin, “Prompt- enhanced federated content representation learning for cross-domain recommendation,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  79. [89]

    Recommendation algorithm based on federated multi-modal learning,

    C. Feng, Z. Feng, and Q. Wang, “Recommendation algorithm based on federated multi-modal learning,” in ICASSP Workshops, 2024

    2024

  80. [90]

    Towards resource-efficient and secure federated multimedia recommendation,

    G. Li, X. Ding, L. Yuan, L. Zhang, and Q. Rong, “Towards resource-efficient and secure federated multimedia recommendation,” in ICASSP, 2024

    2024

  81. [93]

    Federated adaptation for foundation model-based recommendations,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, H. Guo, X. Fang, Y . Song, Z. Liu, G. Zhou, Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, and B. Yang, “Federated adaptation for foundation model-based recommendations,” in IJCAI, 2024

    2024

  82. [94]

    Llm- based federated recommendation,

    J. Zhao, W. Wang, C. Xu, Z. Ren, S.-K. Ng, and T.-S. Chua, “Llm- based federated recommendation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09959 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  83. [95]

    Fellas: Enhancing federated sequential recommendation with llm as external services,

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, G. Ye, T. Chen, N. Q. V . Hung, and H. Yin, “Fellas: Enhancing federated sequential recommendation with llm as external services,” TOIS, 2024

    2024

  84. [96]

    Multifaceted user modeling in recommendation: A federated foundation models approach,

    C. Zhang, G. Long, H. Guo, Z. Liu, G. Zhou, Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, and B. Yang, “Multifaceted user modeling in recommendation: A federated foundation models approach,” in AAAI, 2025

    2025

  85. [97]

    Federated rec- ommendation systems,

    L. Yang, B. Tan, V . W. Zheng, K. Chen, and Q. Yang, “Federated rec- ommendation systems,” in Federated Learning: Privacy and Incentive, 2020

    2020

  86. [98]

    Horizontal federated recommender system: A survey,

    L. Wang, H. Zhou, Y . Bao, X. Yan, G. Shen, and X. Kong, “Horizontal federated recommender system: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys , 2024

    2024

  87. [99]

    Navigat- ing the future of federated recommendation systems with foundation models,

    Z. Li, G. Long, C. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Jiang, and C. Zhang, “Navigat- ing the future of federated recommendation systems with foundation models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00004 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  88. [100]

    A survey on cross-user federated recommendation,

    E. Yang, Y . Xiong, W. Yuan, W. Pan, Q. Yang, and Z. Ming, “A survey on cross-user federated recommendation,” Science China Information Sciences, 2025

    2025

  89. [101]

    Fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback,

    X. He, H. Zhang, M.-Y . Kan, and T.-S. Chua, “Fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback,” in SIGIR, 2016

    2016

  90. [102]

    Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis,

    Y . Zhang, G. Lai, M. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Y . Liu, and S. Ma, “Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis,” in SIGIR, 2014

    2014

  91. [103]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentral- ized data,

    B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentral- ized data,” in AISTATS, 2017

    2017

  92. [104]

    Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback,

    S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, “Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback,” UAI, 2009

    2009

  93. [105]

    Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems,

    Y . Koren, R. Bell, and C. V olinsky, “Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems,” Computer, pp. 30–37, 2009

    2009

  94. [106]

    Fast adaptively weighted matrix factorization for recommendation with implicit feedback,

    J. Chen, C. Wang, S. Zhou, Q. Shi, J. Chen, Y . Feng, and C. Chen, “Fast adaptively weighted matrix factorization for recommendation with implicit feedback,” in AAAI, 2020

    2020

  95. [107]

    Nais: Neural attentive item similarity model for recommendation,

    X. He, Z. He, J. Song, Z. Liu, Y .-G. Jiang, and T.-S. Chua, “Nais: Neural attentive item similarity model for recommendation,” IEEE TKDE, 2018

    2018

  96. [108]

    Atten- tive collaborative filtering: Multimedia recommendation with item-and component-level attention,

    J. Chen, H. Zhang, X. He, L. Nie, W. Liu, and T.-S. Chua, “Atten- tive collaborative filtering: Multimedia recommendation with item-and component-level attention,” in SIGIR, 2017

    2017

  97. [109]

    Collaborative denoising auto-encoders for top-n recommender systems,

    Y . Wu, C. DuBois, A. X. Zheng, and M. Ester, “Collaborative denoising auto-encoders for top-n recommender systems,” in WSDM, 2016

    2016

  98. [110]

    Recvae: A new variational autoencoder for top-n recommendations with implicit feedback,

    I. Shenbin, A. Alekseev, E. Tutubalina, V . Malykh, and S. I. Nikolenko, “Recvae: A new variational autoencoder for top-n recommendations with implicit feedback,” in WSDM, 2020

    2020

  99. [111]

    Learning the structure of auto- encoding recommenders,

    F. Khawar, L. Poon, and N. L. Zhang, “Learning the structure of auto- encoding recommenders,” in WWW, 2020

    2020

  100. [112]

    Disentan- gled graph collaborative filtering,

    X. Wang, H. Jin, A. Zhang, X. He, T. Xu, and T.-S. Chua, “Disentan- gled graph collaborative filtering,” in SIGIR, 2020

    2020

  101. [113]

    Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommen- dation,

    X. He, K. Deng, X. Wang, Y . Li, Y . Zhang, and M. Wang, “Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommen- dation,” in SIGIR, 2020

    2020

  102. [114]

    Dual channel hypergraph collaborative filtering,

    S. Ji, Y . Feng, R. Ji, X. Zhao, W. Tang, and Y . Gao, “Dual channel hypergraph collaborative filtering,” in ACM KDD, 2020

    2020

  103. [115]

    Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach,

    L. Chen, L. Wu, R. Hong, K. Zhang, and M. Wang, “Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach,” in AAAI, 2020

    2020

  104. [116]

    Collaborative metric learning,

    C.-K. Hsieh, L. Yang, Y . Cui, T.-Y . Lin, S. Belongie, and D. Estrin, “Collaborative metric learning,” in WWW, 2017

    2017

  105. [117]

    Translation-based recommenda- tion,

    R. He, W.-C. Kang, and J. McAuley, “Translation-based recommenda- tion,” in RecSys, 2017

    2017

  106. [118]

    Latent relational metric learning via memory-based attention for collaborative ranking,

    Y . Tay, L. Anh Tuan, and S. C. Hui, “Latent relational metric learning via memory-based attention for collaborative ranking,” in WWW, 2018

    2018

  107. [119]

    Hyperml: A boost- ing metric learning approach in hyperbolic space for recommender systems,

    L. Vinh Tran, Y . Tay, S. Zhang, G. Cong, and X. Li, “Hyperml: A boost- ing metric learning approach in hyperbolic space for recommender systems,” in WSDM, 2020

    2020

  108. [120]

    Neural collaborative filtering,

    X. He, L. Liao, H. Zhang, L. Nie, X. Hu, and T.-S. Chua, “Neural collaborative filtering,” in WWW, 2017. 19

    2017

  109. [121]

    Outer product-based neural collaborative filtering,

    X. He, X. Du, X. Wang, F. Tian, J. Tang, and T.-S. Chua, “Outer product-based neural collaborative filtering,” in IJCAI, 2018

    2018

  110. [122]

    Hifgl: A hierarchical framework for cross-silo cross-device federated graph learning,

    Z. Guo, D. Yao, Q. Yang, and H. Liu, “Hifgl: A hierarchical framework for cross-silo cross-device federated graph learning,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  111. [123]

    Hard negative examples are hard, but useful,

    H. Xuan, A. Stylianou, X. Liu, and R. Pless, “Hard negative examples are hard, but useful,” in ECCV, 2020

    2020

  112. [124]

    Personalized latent structure learning for recom- mendation,

    S. Zhang, F. Feng, K. Kuang, W. Zhang, Z. Zhao, H. Yang, T.-S. Chua, and F. Wu, “Personalized latent structure learning for recom- mendation,” TPAMI, 2023

    2023

  113. [125]

    Cross-domain recommendation: challenges, progress, and prospects,

    F. Zhu, Y . Wang, C. Chen, J. Zhou, L. Li, and G. Liu, “Cross-domain recommendation: challenges, progress, and prospects,” in IJCAI, 2021

    2021

  114. [126]

    Towards universal sequence representation learning for recommender systems,

    Y . Hou, S. Mu, W. X. Zhao, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J.-R. Wen, “Towards universal sequence representation learning for recommender systems,” in KDD, 2022

    2022

  115. [127]

    Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation,

    J. Li, M. Wang, J. Li, J. Fu, X. Shen, J. Shang, and J. McAuley, “Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation,” in KDD, 2023

    2023

  116. [128]

    Uniembedding: Learning universal multi-modal multi- domain item embeddings via user-view contrastive learning,

    B. Dai, Z. Du, J. Zhu, J. Xu, D. Zou, Q. Dai, Z. Dong, R. Zhang, and H.-T. Zheng, “Uniembedding: Learning universal multi-modal multi- domain item embeddings via user-view contrastive learning,” in CIKM, 2024

    2024

  117. [129]

    beeformer: Bridging the gap between semantic and interaction similarity in recommender systems,

    V . Vanˇcura, P. Kord ´ık, and M. Straka, “beeformer: Bridging the gap between semantic and interaction similarity in recommender systems,” in RecSys, 2024

    2024

  118. [130]

    A pre-trained zero-shot sequential recommendation framework via popularity dynamics,

    J. Wang, P. Rathi, and H. Sundaram, “A pre-trained zero-shot sequential recommendation framework via popularity dynamics,” in RecSys, 2024

    2024

  119. [131]

    Learning vector- quantized item representation for transferable sequential recom- menders,

    Y . Hou, Z. He, J. McAuley, and W. X. Zhao, “Learning vector- quantized item representation for transferable sequential recom- menders,” in WWW, 2023

    2023

  120. [132]

    A comprehensive survey on multimodal recommender systems: Taxonomy, evaluation, and future directions,

    H. Zhou, X. Zhou, Z. Zeng, L. Zhang, and Z. Shen, “A comprehensive survey on multimodal recommender systems: Taxonomy, evaluation, and future directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04473 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  121. [134]

    Disentangling id and modality effects for session-based recommendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, Z. Ren, X. Wang, H. Lin, and F. Ma, “Disentangling id and modality effects for session-based recommendation,” in SIGIR, 2024

    2024

  122. [135]

    Multimodal recommender systems: A survey,

    Q. Liu, J. Hu, Y . Xiao, X. Zhao, J. Gao, W. Wang, Q. Li, and J. Tang, “Multimodal recommender systems: A survey,” ACM Computing Sur- veys, 2024

    2024

  123. [136]

    Demystifying the optimal performance of multi-class classification,

    M. Jeong, M. Cardone, and A. Dytso, “Demystifying the optimal performance of multi-class classification,” NeuIPS, 2024

    2024

  124. [138]

    xdeepfm: Combining explicit and implicit feature interactions for recommender systems,

    J. Lian, X. Zhou, F. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Xie, and G. Sun, “xdeepfm: Combining explicit and implicit feature interactions for recommender systems,” in KDD, 2018

    2018

  125. [139]

    Dcn v2: Improved deep & cross network and practical lessons for web-scale learning to rank systems,

    R. Wang, R. Shivanna, D. Cheng, S. Jain, D. Lin, L. Hong, and E. Chi, “Dcn v2: Improved deep & cross network and practical lessons for web-scale learning to rank systems,” in WWW, 2021

    2021

  126. [141]

    User-video co-attention network for personalized micro-video recommendation,

    S. Liu, Z. Chen, H. Liu, and X. Hu, “User-video co-attention network for personalized micro-video recommendation,” in WWW, 2019

    2019

  127. [142]

    Disen- tangled multimodal representation learning for recommendation,

    F. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Cheng, A. Liu, L. Nie, and M. Kankanhalli, “Disen- tangled multimodal representation learning for recommendation,” IEEE TMM, 2022

    2022

  128. [143]

    Multi-modal contrastive pre-training for recommendation,

    Z. Liu, Y . Ma, M. Schubert, Y . Ouyang, and Z. Xiong, “Multi-modal contrastive pre-training for recommendation,” in ICMR, 2022

    2022

  129. [144]

    Self-attention fusion and adaptive continual updating for multimodal federated learning with heterogeneous data,

    K. Yin, Z. Ding, X. Ji, and Z. Wang, “Self-attention fusion and adaptive continual updating for multimodal federated learning with heterogeneous data,” Neural Networks, 2025

    2025

  130. [145]

    Multi-view graph convolutional network for multimedia recommendation,

    P. Yu, Z. Tan, G. Lu, and B.-K. Bao, “Multi-view graph convolutional network for multimedia recommendation,” in ACM MM, 2023

    2023

  131. [146]

    Attention-guided multi-step fusion: a hierarchical fusion network for multimodal recom- mendation,

    Y . Zhou, J. Guo, H. Sun, B. Song, and F. R. Yu, “Attention-guided multi-step fusion: a hierarchical fusion network for multimodal recom- mendation,” in SIGIR, 2023

    2023

  132. [147]

    Multimodal federated learning: A survey,

    L. Che, J. Wang, Y . Zhou, and F. Ma, “Multimodal federated learning: A survey,” Sensors, 2023

    2023

  133. [148]

    A survey of multimodal federated learning: background, applications, and perspectives,

    H. Pan, X. Zhao, L. He, Y . Shi, and X. Lin, “A survey of multimodal federated learning: background, applications, and perspectives,” Multi- media Systems, 2024

    2024

  134. [149]

    Federated modality-specific encoders and multimodal anchors for personalized brain tumor segmentation,

    Q. Dai, D. Wei, H. Liu, J. Sun, L. Wang, and Y . Zheng, “Federated modality-specific encoders and multimodal anchors for personalized brain tumor segmentation,” in AAAI, 2024

    2024

  135. [150]

    Cross-modal federated human activity recognition,

    X. Yang, B. Xiong, Y . Huang, and C. Xu, “Cross-modal federated human activity recognition,” TPAMI, 2024

    2024

  136. [151]

    Fedmsplit: Correlation-adaptive federated multi-task learning across multimodal split networks,

    J. Chen and A. Zhang, “Fedmsplit: Correlation-adaptive federated multi-task learning across multimodal split networks,” in KDD, 2022

    2022

  137. [152]

    Fedmultimodal: A benchmark for multimodal federated learning,

    T. Feng, D. Bose, T. Zhang, R. Hebbar, A. Ramakrishna, R. Gupta, M. Zhang, S. Avestimehr, and S. Narayanan, “Fedmultimodal: A benchmark for multimodal federated learning,” in KDD, 2023

    2023

  138. [153]

    Pfedprompt: Learning personalized prompt for vision-language models in federated learning,

    T. Guo, S. Guo, and J. Wang, “Pfedprompt: Learning personalized prompt for vision-language models in federated learning,” in WWW, 2023

    2023

  139. [154]

    Fedcmr: Federated cross-modal retrieval,

    L. Zong, Q. Xie, J. Zhou, P. Wu, X. Zhang, and B. Xu, “Fedcmr: Federated cross-modal retrieval,” in SIGIR, 2021

    2021

  140. [155]

    Language models are few-shot learners,

    T. B. Brown, “Language models are few-shot learners,” NeuIPS, 2020

    2020

  141. [156]

    Unified vision-language pre-training for image captioning and vqa,

    L. Zhou, H. Palangi, L. Zhang, H. Hu, J. Corso, and J. Gao, “Unified vision-language pre-training for image captioning and vqa,” in AAAI, 2020

    2020

  142. [157]

    Empowering molecule discovery for molecule-caption translation with large language models: A chatgpt perspective,

    J. Li, Y . Liu, W. Fan, X.-Y . Wei, H. Liu, J. Tang, and Q. Li, “Empowering molecule discovery for molecule-caption translation with large language models: A chatgpt perspective,” TKDE, 2024

    2024

  143. [158]

    A survey on large language models for recommendation,

    L. Wu, Z. Zheng, Z. Qiu, H. Wang, H. Gu, T. Shen, C. Qin, C. Zhu, H. Zhu, Q. Liu et al. , “A survey on large language models for recommendation,” World Wide Web, 2024

    2024

  144. [159]

    Empowering news recommenda- tion with pre-trained language models,

    C. Wu, F. Wu, T. Qi, and Y . Huang, “Empowering news recommenda- tion with pre-trained language models,” in SIGIR, 2021

    2021

  145. [160]

    U-bert: Pre-training user representations for improved recommendation,

    Z. Qiu, X. Wu, J. Gao, and W. Fan, “U-bert: Pre-training user representations for improved recommendation,” in AAAI, 2021

    2021

  146. [161]

    Improving conversa- tional recommendation systems’ quality with context-aware item meta- information,

    B. Yang, C. Han, Y . Li, L. Zuo, and Z. Yu, “Improving conversa- tional recommendation systems’ quality with context-aware item meta- information,” in NAACL Findings, 2022

    2022

  147. [162]

    Pre-train, prompt, and recom- mendation: A comprehensive survey of language modeling paradigm adaptations in recommender systems,

    P. Liu, L. Zhang, and J. A. Gulla, “Pre-train, prompt, and recom- mendation: A comprehensive survey of language modeling paradigm adaptations in recommender systems,” TACL, 2023

    2023

  148. [163]

    Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5),

    S. Geng, S. Liu, Z. Fu, Y . Ge, and Y . Zhang, “Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5),” in RecSys, 2022

    2022

  149. [164]

    How to index item ids for recommendation foundation models,

    W. Hua, S. Xu, Y . Ge, and Y . Zhang, “How to index item ids for recommendation foundation models,” in SIGIR, 2023

    2023

  150. [165]

    Recommender systems with generative retrieval,

    S. Rajput, N. Mehta, A. Singh, R. Hulikal Keshavan, T. Vu, L. Heldt, L. Hong, Y . Tay, V . Tran, J. Samost et al. , “Recommender systems with generative retrieval,” NeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  151. [166]

    Zero-shot item-based recommendation via multi-task product knowledge graph pre-training,

    Z. Fan, Z. Liu, S. Heinecke, J. Zhang, H. Wang, C. Xiong, and P. S. Yu, “Zero-shot item-based recommendation via multi-task product knowledge graph pre-training,” in CIKM, 2023

    2023

  152. [167]

    Where to go next for recommender systems? id-vs. modality-based recommender models revisited,

    Z. Yuan, F. Yuan, Y . Song, Y . Li, J. Fu, F. Yang, Y . Pan, and Y . Ni, “Where to go next for recommender systems? id-vs. modality-based recommender models revisited,” in SIGIR, 2023

    2023

  153. [168]

    Chat- rec: Towards interactive and explainable llms-augmented recommender system,

    Y . Gao, T. Sheng, Y . Xiang, Y . Xiong, H. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Chat- rec: Towards interactive and explainable llms-augmented recommender system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14524 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  154. [169]

    Unlocking the potential of large language models for explainable recommendations,

    Y . Luo, M. Cheng, H. Zhang, J. Lu, and E. Chen, “Unlocking the potential of large language models for explainable recommendations,” in DASFAA, 2024

    2024

  155. [170]

    Lane: Logic alignment of non-tuning large language models and online recom- mendation systems for explainable reason generation,

    H. Zhao, S. Zheng, L. Wu, B. Yu, and J. Wang, “Lane: Logic alignment of non-tuning large language models and online recom- mendation systems for explainable reason generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02833, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  156. [171]

    Fine-tuning large language model based explainable recommendation with explainable quality reward,

    M. Yang, M. Zhu, Y . Wang, L. Chen, Y . Zhao, X. Wang, B. Han, X. Zheng, and J. Yin, “Fine-tuning large language model based explainable recommendation with explainable quality reward,” inAAAI, 2024

    2024

  157. [172]

    Large language models as zero-shot conversational recommenders,

    Z. He, Z. Xie, R. Jha, H. Steck, D. Liang, Y . Feng, B. P. Majumder, N. Kallus, and J. McAuley, “Large language models as zero-shot conversational recommenders,” in CIKM, 2023

    2023

  158. [173]

    Recommender ai agent: Integrating large language models for interactive recommen- dations,

    X. Huang, J. Lian, Y . Lei, J. Yao, D. Lian, and X. Xie, “Recommender ai agent: Integrating large language models for interactive recommen- dations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16505 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  159. [174]

    A large language model enhanced conversational recommender system,

    Y . Feng, S. Liu, Z. Xue, Q. Cai, L. Hu, P. Jiang, K. Gai, and F. Sun, “A large language model enhanced conversational recommender system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06212 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  160. [175]

    Can public large language models help private cross- device federated learning?

    B. Wang, Y . J. Zhang, Y . Cao, B. Li, H. B. McMahan, S. Oh, Z. Xu, and M. Zaheer, “Can public large language models help private cross- device federated learning?” NAACL Findings, 2024. 20

    2024

  161. [176]

    Federated fine-tuning of billion-sized language models across mobile devices,

    M. Xu, Y . Wu, D. Cai, X. Li, and S. Wang, “Federated fine-tuning of billion-sized language models across mobile devices,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13894, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  162. [177]

    Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,

    F. Wu, Z. Li, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Gao, “Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  163. [178]

    Grounding foundation models through federated transfer learning: A general framework,

    Y . Kang, T. Fan, H. Gu, X. Zhang, L. Fan, and Q. Yang, “Grounding foundation models through federated transfer learning: A general framework,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17431 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  164. [179]

    Fedmkt: Federated mutual knowledge transfer for large and small language models,

    T. Fan, G. Ma, Y . Kang, H. Gu, Y . Song, L. Fan, K. Chen, and Q. Yang, “Fedmkt: Federated mutual knowledge transfer for large and small language models,” COLING, 2025

    2025

  165. [180]

    Per- sonalized federated continual learning via multi-granularity prompt,

    H. Yu, X. Yang, X. Gao, Y . Kang, H. Wang, J. Zhang, and T. Li, “Per- sonalized federated continual learning via multi-granularity prompt,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  166. [181]

    Openfedllm: Training large language models on decentral- ized private data via federated learning,

    R. Ye, W. Wang, J. Chai, D. Li, Z. Li, Y . Xu, Y . Du, Y . Wang, and S. Chen, “Openfedllm: Training large language models on decentral- ized private data via federated learning,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  167. [182]

    Federatedscope-llm: A comprehensive package for fine-tuning large language models in federated learning,

    W. Kuang, B. Qian, Z. Li, D. Chen, D. Gao, X. Pan, Y . Xie, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Zhou, “Federatedscope-llm: A comprehensive package for fine-tuning large language models in federated learning,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  168. [183]

    Federated trustchain: Blockchain-enhanced llm training and unlearn- ing,

    X. Zuo, M. Wang, T. Zhu, L. Zhang, D. Ye, S. Yu, and W. Zhou, “Federated trustchain: Blockchain-enhanced llm training and unlearn- ing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04076 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  169. [184]

    Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self- generated instructions,

    Y . Wang, Y . Kordi, S. Mishra, A. Liu, N. A. Smith, D. Khashabi, and H. Hajishirzi, “Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self- generated instructions,” ACL, 2023

    2023

  170. [185]

    An upload-efficient scheme for transferring knowledge from a server-side pre-trained generator to clients in heterogeneous federated learning,

    J. Zhang, Y . Liu, Y . Hua, and J. Cao, “An upload-efficient scheme for transferring knowledge from a server-side pre-trained generator to clients in heterogeneous federated learning,” in CVPR, 2024

    2024

  171. [186]

    Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models,

    J. Wei, D. Huang, Y . Lu, D. Zhou, and Q. V . Le, “Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03958, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  172. [187]

    Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms,

    M. Deshpande and G. Karypis, “Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms,” ATOIS, 2004

    2004

  173. [188]

    On sampling top-k recommendation evaluation,

    D. Li, R. Jin, J. Gao, and Z. Liu, “On sampling top-k recommendation evaluation,” in ACM KDD, 2020

    2020

  174. [189]

    A survey on trustworthy recommender systems,

    Y . Ge, S. Liu, Z. Fu, J. Tan, Z. Li, S. Xu, Y . Li, Y . Xian, and Y . Zhang, “A survey on trustworthy recommender systems,” RecSys, 2024

    2024

  175. [190]

    Mitigating confounding bias in practical recommender systems with partially inaccessible exposure status,

    T. Cao, Q. Xu, Z. Yang, and Q. Huang, “Mitigating confounding bias in practical recommender systems with partially inaccessible exposure status,” TPAMI, 2023

    2023

  176. [191]

    A survey on the fairness of recommender systems,

    Y . Wang, W. Ma, M. Zhang, Y . Liu, and S. Ma, “A survey on the fairness of recommender systems,” TOIS, 2023

    2023

  177. [192]

    Item-side fairness of large language model-based recommendation system,

    M. Jiang, K. Bao, J. Zhang, W. Wang, Z. Yang, F. Feng, and X. He, “Item-side fairness of large language model-based recommendation system,” in WWW, 2024

    2024

  178. [193]

    Counterfactual explanation for fairness in recommendation,

    X. Wang, Q. Li, D. Yu, Q. Li, and G. Xu, “Counterfactual explanation for fairness in recommendation,” TOIS, 2024

    2024

  179. [194]

    User-item fairness tradeoffs in recommendations,

    S. Greenwood, S. Chiniah, and N. Garg, “User-item fairness tradeoffs in recommendations,” in NeuIPS, 2024

    2024

  180. [195]

    Agnostic federated learning,

    M. Mohri, G. Sivek, and A. T. Suresh, “Agnostic federated learning,” in ICML, 2019

    2019

  181. [196]

    Fair resource allocation in federated learning,

    T. Li, M. Sanjabi, A. Beirami, and V . Smith, “Fair resource allocation in federated learning,” in ICLR, 2020

    2020

  182. [197]

    Disentangled representation learning for recommendation,

    X. Wang, H. Chen, Y . Zhou, J. Ma, and W. Zhu, “Disentangled representation learning for recommendation,” TPAMI, 2022

    2022

  183. [198]

    Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives,

    Y . Zhang, X. Chen et al., “Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval , 2020

    2020

  184. [199]

    Path language modeling over knowledge graphsfor explainable recommen- dation,

    S. Geng, Z. Fu, J. Tan, Y . Ge, G. De Melo, and Y . Zhang, “Path language modeling over knowledge graphsfor explainable recommen- dation,” in WWW, 2022

    2022

  185. [200]

    Attention is not the only choice: Counterfactual reasoning for path-based explainable recommendation,

    Y . Li, X. Sun, H. Chen, S. Zhang, Y . Yang, and G. Xu, “Attention is not the only choice: Counterfactual reasoning for path-based explainable recommendation,” TKDE, 2024

    2024

  186. [201]

    Kr-gcn: Knowledge-aware reason- ing with graph convolution network for explainable recommendation,

    T. Ma, L. Huang, Q. Lu, and S. Hu, “Kr-gcn: Knowledge-aware reason- ing with graph convolution network for explainable recommendation,” TOIS, 2023

    2023

  187. [202]

    Machine unlearning: Solutions and challenges,

    J. Xu, Z. Wu, C. Wang, and X. Jia, “Machine unlearning: Solutions and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  188. [203]

    Re- visit targeted model poisoning on federated recommendation: Optimize via multi-objective transport,

    J. Su, C. Chen, W. Liu, Z. Lin, S. Shen, W. Wang, and X. Zheng, “Re- visit targeted model poisoning on federated recommendation: Optimize via multi-objective transport,” in SIGIR, 2024

    2024

  189. [204]

    Fedrecat- tack: Model poisoning attack to federated recommendation,

    D. Rong, S. Ye, R. Zhao, H. N. Yuen, J. Chen, and Q. He, “Fedrecat- tack: Model poisoning attack to federated recommendation,” in ICDE, 2022

    2022

  190. [205]

    A survey on federated unlearning: Challenges, methods, and future directions,

    Z. Liu, Y . Jiang, J. Shen, M. Peng, K.-Y . Lam, X. Yuan, and X. Liu, “A survey on federated unlearning: Challenges, methods, and future directions,” ACM Computing Surveys , 2024

    2024

  191. [206]

    Relevance meets diversity: A user-centric framework for knowledge exploration through recom- mendations,

    E. Coppolillo, G. Manco, and A. Gionis, “Relevance meets diversity: A user-centric framework for knowledge exploration through recom- mendations,” in KDD, 2024

    2024

  192. [207]

    Diversity matters: User-centric multi-interest learning for conversational movie recommendation,

    Y . Zheng, G. Wang, Y . Liu, and L. Lin, “Diversity matters: User-centric multi-interest learning for conversational movie recommendation,” in ACM MM, 2024

    2024

  193. [208]

    Recbole: Towards a unified, comprehensive and efficient framework for recommendation algorithms,

    W. X. Zhao, S. Mu, Y . Hou, Z. Lin, Y . Chen, X. Pan, K. Li, Y . Lu, H. Wang, C. Tian et al., “Recbole: Towards a unified, comprehensive and efficient framework for recommendation algorithms,” in CIKM, 2021

    2021

  194. [209]

    Recbole 2.0: Towards a more up-to- date recommendation library,

    W. X. Zhao, Y . Hou, X. Pan, C. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Lin, J. Zhang, S. Bian, J. Tang, W. Sun et al., “Recbole 2.0: Towards a more up-to- date recommendation library,” in CIKM, 2022

    2022

  195. [210]

    Open benchmarking for click-through rate prediction,

    J. Zhu, J. Liu, S. Yang, Q. Zhang, and X. He, “Open benchmarking for click-through rate prediction,” in CIKM, 2021

    2021

  196. [211]

    Bars: Towards open benchmarking for recommender systems,

    J. Zhu, Q. Dai, L. Su, R. Ma, J. Liu, G. Cai, X. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Bars: Towards open benchmarking for recommender systems,” in SIGIR, 2022

    2022

  197. [212]

    Daisyrec 2.0: Benchmarking recommendation for rigorous evaluation,

    Z. Sun, H. Fang, J. Yang, X. Qu, H. Liu, D. Yu, Y .-S. Ong, and J. Zhang, “Daisyrec 2.0: Benchmarking recommendation for rigorous evaluation,” TPAMI, 2022

    2022

  198. [213]

    Pfllib: A beginner-friendly and comprehensive personalized federated learning library and benchmark,

    J. Zhang, Y . Liu, Y . Hua, H. Wang, T. Song, Z. Xue, R. Ma, and J. Cao, “Pfllib: A beginner-friendly and comprehensive personalized federated learning library and benchmark,” JMLR, 2025

    2025

  199. [214]

    Incmsr: An incremental learning approach for multi-scenario recommendation,

    K. Zhang, Y . Wang, X. Li, R. Tang, and R. Zhang, “Incmsr: An incremental learning approach for multi-scenario recommendation,” in WSDM, 2024

    2024

  200. [215]

    Incremental learning for multi-interest sequen- tial recommendation,

    Z. Wang and Y . Shen, “Incremental learning for multi-interest sequen- tial recommendation,” in ICDE, 2023

    2023

  201. [216]

    Graphsail: Graph structure aware incremental learning for recommender systems,

    Y . Xu, Y . Zhang, W. Guo, H. Guo, R. Tang, and M. Coates, “Graphsail: Graph structure aware incremental learning for recommender systems,” in CIKM, 2020

    2020

  202. [217]

    Influential exemplar replay for incremental learning in recommender systems,

    X. Zhang, Y . Chen, C. Ma, Y . Fang, and I. King, “Influential exemplar replay for incremental learning in recommender systems,” in AAAI, 2024

    2024

  203. [218]

    Fire: Fast incremental recommendation with graph signal processing,

    J. Xia, D. Li, H. Gu, J. Liu, T. Lu, and N. Gu, “Fire: Fast incremental recommendation with graph signal processing,” in WWW, 2022

    2022

  204. [219]

    A framework for elastic adaptation of user multiple intents in sequential recommendation,

    Z. Wang and Y . Shen, “A framework for elastic adaptation of user multiple intents in sequential recommendation,” TKDE, 2024

    2024

  205. [220]

    Towards efficient replay in federated incremental learning,

    Y . Li, Q. Li, H. Wang, R. Li, W. Zhong, and G. Zhang, “Towards efficient replay in federated incremental learning,” in CVPR, 2024

    2024

  206. [221]

    Federated class-incremental learning,

    J. Dong, L. Wang, Z. Fang, G. Sun, S. Xu, X. Wang, and Q. Zhu, “Federated class-incremental learning,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  207. [222]

    Linear recurrent units for sequential recommendation,

    Z. Yue, Y . Wang, Z. He, H. Zeng, J. McAuley, and D. Wang, “Linear recurrent units for sequential recommendation,” in WSDM, 2024

    2024

  208. [223]

    Preliminary study on incremental learning for large language model- based recommender systems,

    T. Shi, Y . Zhang, Z. Xu, C. Chen, F. Feng, X. He, and Q. Tian, “Preliminary study on incremental learning for large language model- based recommender systems,” in CIKM, 2024

    2024

  209. [224]

    Personalized online federated learning with multiple kernels,

    P. M Ghari and Y . Shen, “Personalized online federated learning with multiple kernels,” in NeuIPS, 2022

    2022

  210. [225]

    Privacy-preserved and responsible recommenders: From conventional defense to federated learning and blockchain,

    W. Ali, X. Zhou, and J. Shao, “Privacy-preserved and responsible recommenders: From conventional defense to federated learning and blockchain,” ACM Computing Surveys , 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.