Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

WaveLLDM aims to make diffusion-based speech enhancement and restoration edge-friendly by running the whole process in a compressed latent space, achieving low spectral error (LSD 0.48–0.60) with 13.98M–51.93M parameters, though perceptual

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

WaveLLDM, a lightweight latent diffusion model with a neural codec, achieves low spectral distortion (LSD 0.48-0.60) on speech restoration but scores far below SOTA on PESQ and STOI.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection An honest, incremental latent-diffusion speech restoration paper whose positive result rests on an undefined LSD metric; worth a careful peer review with mandatory reproducibility fixes. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.21153 v1 pith:FZN3JCAP submitted 2025-08-28 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

WaveLLDM: Design and Development of a Lightweight Latent Diffusion Model for Speech Enhancement and Restoration

Kevin Putra Santoso , Rizka Wakhidatus Sholikah , Raden Venantius Hari Ginardi This is my paper
classification cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS
keywords speech enhancementspeech restorationlatent diffusion modelneural audio codecaudio inpaintingFireflyGANRotary U-Netlog-spectral distance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

WaveLLDM is an attempt to make diffusion-based speech enhancement and restoration cheap enough for edge devices by moving nearly all computation into a compressed latent space. The paper's central claim is that a neural audio codec can squeeze speech into compact latent vectors, and a lightweight diffusion U-Net can denoise and inpaint those vectors—recovering 50–450 ms of missing audio without video or other auxiliary signals. On the VoiceBank+DEMAND test set, the two model variants achieve low Log-Spectral Distance scores (0.48–0.60), indicating faithful spectral reconstruction, and the authors report good adaptation to unseen noisy speech. However, on perceptual quality and intelligibility (WB-PESQ 1.62–1.71, STOI 0.76–0.78), the model trails current state-of-the-art systems; the authors attribute this to limited training and the absence of fine-tuning rather than to the latent-space design itself.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that a two-stage architecture—FireflyGAN as a neural audio codec and a Rotary U-Net as a DDPM noise estimator—can perform speech denoising and inpainting entirely in a compressed latent space. FireflyGAN compresses the mel-spectrogram into quantized discrete latents using a ConvNeXt encoder, grouped finite scalar quantization, and a simplified HiFi-GAN decoder; the diffusion model then operates on continuous latents, predicting Gaussian noise conditioned on degraded latents. The authors report low Log-Spectral Distance values (0.48–0.60) and good generalization to unseen noisy speech, while explicitly acknowledging that WB-PESQ and STOI fall below state-of-th

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the pairing of FireflyGAN—a neural audio codec combining a ConvNeXt encoder, grouped finite scalar quantization (GFSQ), and a HiFi-GAN-style decoder with a Parallel Block—with a Rotary U-Net, a DDPM noise estimator built from temporal ConvNeXt blocks, FiLM conditioning, and linear attention with rotary position embeddings. The codec maps waveforms to compact latents and reconstructs audio; the diffusion model learns to denoise and inpaint in that latent space instead of operating directly on waveforms or spectrograms.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a small parameter count and operation in latent space automatically mean lightweight, real-time, edge-device performance; the paper never measures latency, throughput, or compute, so if inference is slow the central motivation collapses.

What would settle it

Run WaveLLDM-S and WaveLLDM-Base on edge-class hardware and measure end-to-end inference latency and throughput; if they cannot achieve real-time on such devices, the lightweight claim fails. Separately, retrain or fine-tune the model for longer and re-measure WB-PESQ and STOI; if the gap to state-of-the-art methods persists, the paper's attribution to insufficient training is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • One model can denoise and inpaint 50–450 ms of missing speech without auxiliary modalities, because both tasks share the same latent codec and diffusion prior.
  • Spectral reconstruction, measured by LSD 0.48–0.60, is substantially better than the cited AudioLDM baselines (LSD 0.98–1.12) on the same evaluation setup.
  • At 13.98M and 51.93M parameters, WaveLLDM is far smaller than AudioLDM-S (181M) and AudioLDM-L (739M), which is what the 'lightweight' claim rests on.
  • Current WB-PESQ (1.62–1.71) and STOI (0.76–0.78) fall short of methods like Mamba-SEUNet, Schrödinger Bridge, DiffGMM, and MP-SENet; the paper attributes this gap to suboptimal tuning, missing fine-tuning, and short training rather than to the latent design.
  • The two-stage training recipe—codec pretraining with spectral regularization, then diffusion training on continuous latents—provides a reusable template for future latent-space audio restoration models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reported gap is really caused by training duration and missing fine-tuning, then extending training or adding a fine-tuning phase should lift WB-PESQ and STOI substantially without changing the architecture; that is directly testable.
  • Low LSD together with low PESQ hints that WaveLLDM reconstructs global spectral shape well but misses fine temporal detail; subjective listening tests or metrics that reward perceptual equivalence could reveal whether the gap matters for real use.
  • The edge-device claim is an assumption, not a demonstrated result; measuring end-to-end latency on low-power hardware would be the decisive next experiment.
  • Because diffusion runs on continuous latents rather than the quantized codec output, the codec and the generative model can be upgraded independently; future work could swap in a better codec or a stronger estimator without retraining both from scratch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes WaveLLDM, a two-stage latent diffusion model for speech enhancement and restoration. Stage one trains a FireflyGAN neural codec (ConvNeXt encoder, GFSQ quantization, HiFi-GAN-style decoder) to map waveforms to a compressed latent space and back. Stage two trains a rotary U-Net DDPM to denoise and restore latent representations. The authors report LSD values of 0.48–0.60 on the VoiceBank+DEMAND test set, with WB-PESQ 1.62–1.71 and STOI 0.76–0.78, explicitly acknowledging that these perceptual scores fall below state-of-the-art methods. The paper claims low-LSD spectral reconstruction, adaptability to unseen noisy speech, and suitability for real-time edge inference.

Significance. If the reported LSD results were properly defined and calibrated, WaveLLDM would be a useful demonstration that a compact codec plus latent DDPM can perform speech restoration with reasonable spectral fidelity at a fraction of the parameter count of large text-to-audio latent diffusion models. The two-stage training pipeline and the use of linear attention with rotary embeddings are clearly described in principle, and the paper is candid about its perceptual-quality limitations. However, the central positive claims — accurate spectral reconstruction and lightweight real-time operation — are currently unsupported by the evidence as presented. The DDPM formulation is standard, and the reported numbers are internally consistent, but the evaluation and protocol descriptions are not yet at journal standard.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B and Algorithm 1/2] The restoration/inpainting protocol is not defined. Equation (16) and the loss in Equation (17) condition the noise estimator on a degraded latent z_deg, and Table 4.1 reports results for mask lengths 0–450 ms. However, Algorithm 1 trains without conditioning (θ on ε_θ(z_t, t) only), Algorithm 2 samples without conditioning or mask information, and no text describes how masks are generated, applied to the latent, or handled during inference. Without this information, the mask-dependent LSD rows in Table 4.1 cannot be reproduced or interpreted.
  2. [Section IV.C / Table 4.1] The Log-Spectral Distance metric is never defined. The paper gives no STFT size, window type, hop length, frequency range, frame alignment, unit, or dB convention. The reported values (0.48–0.60 dB) are far lower than typical LSD for noisy or enhanced speech and are difficult to reconcile with WB-PESQ 1.62–1.71 / STOI 0.76–0.78 on the same test set. If LSD was computed on mel features, on the codec reconstruction rather than the enhanced output, or only on non-masked frames, the central spectral-fidelity claim would be an artifact. The authors must define the metric precisely and report it on standard enhancement/inpainting baselines.
  3. [Section I and Section IV] The 'lightweight' and 'real-time edge' claims are not validated. The introduction states the architecture supports real-time processing on edge devices, and the paper emphasizes lower parameter counts, but no inference latency, throughput, real-time factor, memory footprint, or hardware measurement is reported. Parameter count alone is not sufficient: latent diffusion models require iterative sampling, and the codec adds inference cost. The efficiency claim needs quantitative support, including wall-clock time over the reported mask durations.
  4. [Section IV.C / Table 4.2] The evaluation is too narrow to support the paper's claims. The only LSD comparisons are AudioLDM-S and AudioLDM-L at mask 0 — text-to-audio generation models, not restoration or enhancement baselines — and no LSD values are given for the speech-enhancement SOTA methods listed in Table 4.2. No error bars, confidence intervals, or statistical significance tests are reported. The 'additional experiments' with natural noise and the claimed adaptation to unseen data are described only qualitatively. A quantitative comparison against restoration-specific diffusion baselines (e.g., Hi-Res LDM, Diffiner, or diffusion inpainting models) on both LSD and PESQ/STOI is necessary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV.A and IV.C] The text says evaluation uses three metrics (PESQ, STOI, LSD) but Section IV.C says 'the authors use two objective metrics' and mentions only PESQ/STOI before later discussing LSD. This is confusing and should be corrected.
  2. [Table 4.1] The table header says 'Mask (ms)' and reports mask lengths, but the text does not explain what mask 0 means (presumably no mask) or how the masked regions were selected. Please clarify. Also, decimal commas (e.g., 13,98 instead of 13.98) should be standardized.
  3. [Table 4.2] The table is labeled 'Tabel 4.2' (language inconsistency) and the 'Metods' row header is misspelled. Also, no LSD column is present even though Table 4.1 is said to be the LSD comparison.
  4. [Section IV.B] The diffusion training duration appears as '500 epochs (15.4 × 10Θ step)' with a formatting error; the exponent should be typed correctly. The audio length of 229,376 samples and the sampling rate of 48 kHz should be checked against the VoiceBank+DEMAND standard (typically 16 kHz).
  5. [General] Several equations and symbols are corrupted by typesetting issues (e.g., Eq. (4), Eq. (10), and the loss weights in Eq. (24)), and some references are informal (e.g., [16], [30], [32]). A careful copyedit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: WaveLLDM's architecture, training losses, and test-set evaluations are self-contained; reported metrics do not reduce to fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The two-stage training (FireflyGAN codec pretraining with adversarial, mel-spectrogram, multi-scale spectral, and feature-matching losses; Rotary U-Net DDPM trained to predict noise using standard DDPM equations) is stated with explicit equations (Eqs. 10-17, 24), and evaluation is performed on the held-out Voicebank+DEMAND test set using PESQ, STOI, and LSD. The LSD values in Table 4.1 are empirical outputs of the trained model, not quantities fitted to the test set, and no parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper cites external prior work (DDPM, HiFi-GAN, ConvNeXt, GFSQ, AudioLDM, etc.) for components, but none of these citations is self-citational or invoked to forbid alternatives. The self-reported limitations (suboptimal tuning, no fine-tuning, limited training duration, PESQ 1.62-1.71 and STOI 0.76-0.78 below SOTA) are honest acknowledgments, not circular moves. The skeptic's concern that the LSD metric is undefined and appears implausibly low is a measurement-validity/correctness issue, not circularity, because the paper does not define LSD in terms of its own outputs or fit it to the reported numbers. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's contributions rest heavily on standard diffusion model mathematics and on the unvalidated assumption that the chosen codec's latent space is well-suited for diffusion-based restoration. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced. The free parameters are training hyperparameters and codebook settings that are chosen by hand but not fitted to the reported metrics.

free parameters (5)
  • GFSQ codebook level configuration = [8,5,5,5]
    Chosen for the quantization codebook; affects latent representation capacity.
  • Loss weights for codec training = lambda_mel=30, lambda_spec=20, lambda_fm=2
    Hand-tuned weighting of reconstruction and adversarial losses.
  • Latent dimension d = not reported
    The dimension of the latent space is not specified numerically, making the compression ratio ambiguous.
  • Audio durations = 0.68s (stage 1), 4.78s (stage 2)
    Training clip lengths chosen without justification; affect masking range and complexity.
  • Training steps = 250,000 (codec); 500 epochs (diffusion)
    Training budgets chosen; authors attribute underperformance to insufficient duration.
axioms (4)
  • standard math DDPM forward/reverse diffusion equations (Eq. 14-16) are correct and applicable to the latent space.
    The diffusion formulation is standard from Ho et al. [14] and is used directly.
  • domain assumption VoiceBank+DEMAND test set is a valid benchmark for speech enhancement evaluation.
    The paper assumes this standard dataset is representative for measuring restoration quality.
  • domain assumption The combined LibriVox + VoiceBank+DEMAND dataset, augmented with unspecified natural noises, is adequate training data.
    The paper does not characterize the distribution or quality of the added noise samples.
  • ad hoc to paper Low LSD scores imply accurate spectral reconstruction even when PESQ and STOI are low.
    This interpretive link is central to the claim of 'preserving reconstruction quality', but it is not justified in the text.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of WaveLLDM: Design and Development of a Lightweight Latent Diffusion Model for Speech Enhancement and Restoration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FZN3JCAP

@misc{pith2026250821153,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: WaveLLDM: Design and Development of a Lightweight Latent Diffusion Model for Speech Enhancement and Restoration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FZN3JCAP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21153}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

High-quality audio is essential in a wide range of applications, including online communication, virtual assistants, and the multimedia industry. However, degradation caused by noise, compression, and transmission artifacts remains a major challenge. While diffusion models have proven effective for audio restoration, they typically require significant computational resources and struggle to handle longer missing segments. This study introduces WaveLLDM (Wave Lightweight Latent Diffusion Model), an architecture that integrates an efficient neural audio codec with latent diffusion for audio restoration and denoising. Unlike conventional approaches that operate in the time or spectral domain, WaveLLDM processes audio in a compressed latent space, reducing computational complexity while preserving reconstruction quality. Empirical evaluations on the Voicebank+DEMAND test set demonstrate that WaveLLDM achieves accurate spectral reconstruction with low Log-Spectral Distance (LSD) scores (0.48 to 0.60) and good adaptability to unseen data. However, it still underperforms compared to state-of-the-art methods in terms of perceptual quality and speech clarity, with WB-PESQ scores ranging from 1.62 to 1.71 and STOI scores between 0.76 and 0.78. These limitations are attributed to suboptimal architectural tuning, the absence of fine-tuning, and insufficient training duration. Nevertheless, the flexible architecture that combines a neural audio codec and latent diffusion model provides a strong foundation for future development.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21153 by Kevin Putra Santoso, Raden Venantius Hari Ginardi, Rizka Wakhidatus Sholikah.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Impact of voice and speech disorders on communication,

    A. Janse and J. L. Verstraete, "Impact of voice and speech disorders on communication," J. Commun. Disord., vol. 92, p. 106097, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8138221/

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Fill in the Gap! Combining Self-supervised Representation Learning with Neural Audio Synthesis for Speech Inpainting,

    I. Asaad, M. Jacquelin, O. Perrotin, L. Girin, and T. Hueber, "Fill in the Gap! Combining Self-supervised Representation Learning with Neural Audio Synthesis for Speech Inpainting," arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20101, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20101

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    High Fidelity Speech Synthesis with Adversarial Networks,

    M. Bińkowski, J. Donahue, S. Dieleman, A. Clark, E. Elsen, N. Casagrande, L. C. Cobo, and K. Simonyan, "High Fidelity Speech Synthesis with Adversarial Networks," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11646

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems,

    H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. Mccann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, "Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems," arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14687, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14687

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based music generation: Scope, applications, and future trends,

    M. Civit, J. Civit-Masot, F. Cuadrado, and M. J. Escalona, "A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based music generation: Scope, applications, and future trends," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 209, Art. no. 118190, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118190

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems,

    G. Daras, H. Chung, C.-H. Lai, Y. Mitsufuji, J. C. Ye, P. Milanfar, A. G. Dimakis, and M. Delbracio, "A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems," arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00083, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    High Fidelity Neural Audio Compression,

    A. Défossez, J. Copet, G. Synnaeve, and Y. Adi, "High Fidelity Neural Audio Compression," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13438, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13438

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis,

    P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, "Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis," arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05233, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    High-Resolution Speech Restoration with Latent Diffusion Model

    T. Dhyani, F. Lux, M. Mancusi, G. Fabbro, F. Hohl, and N. T. Vu, "High-Resolution Speech Restoration with Latent Diffusion Model," arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11145, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    GPTQ: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers,

    E. Frantar, S. Ashkboos, T. Hoefler, and D. Alistarh, "GPTQ: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17323, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17323

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Generative adversarial networks,

    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial networks," in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NIPS), 2014, pp. 2672-2680. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    A survey of audio enhancement algorithms for music, speech, bioacoustics, biomedical, industrial and environmental sounds by image U-Net,

    S. Gul and M. S. Khan, "A survey of audio enhancement algorithms for music, speech, bioacoustics, biomedical, industrial and environmental sounds by image U-Net," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 144456-144483, 2023, doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3344813

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    VRDMG: Vocal Restoration via Diffusion Posterior Sampling with Multiple Guidance

    C. Hernandez-Olivan, K. Saito, N. Murata, C.-H. Lai, M. A. Martínez- Ramirez, W.-H. Liao, and Y. Mitsufuji, "VRDMG: Vocal Restoration via Diffusion Posterior Sampling with Multiple Guidance," arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06934, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06934

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, "Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11239, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    VoiceBank-DEMAND,

    I. Shchekotov, P. Andreev, O. Ivanov, A. Alanov, and D. Vetrov, "VoiceBank-DEMAND," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.57702/qvsb5t5n

    work page doi:10.57702/qvsb5t5n 2024

  16. [16]

    Voice Technology: Transforming Interaction in Every Industry,

    J. Katariya, "Voice Technology: Transforming Interaction in Every Industry," Moon Technolabs, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.moontechnolabs.com/blog/voice-technology/

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Kullback-Leibler Divergence,

    J. M. Joyce, "Kullback-Leibler Divergence," in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, Springer, 2011, pp. 720-722, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_327

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_327 2011

  18. [18]

    Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attention,

    A. Katharopoulos, A. Vyas, N. Pappas, and F. Fleuret, "Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attention," arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16236, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16236

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesis,

    J. Kong, J. Kim, and J. Bae, "HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesis," arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.05646, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05646

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesis,

    Z. Kong, W. Ping, J. Huang, K. Zhao, and B. Catanzaro, "DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesis," arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09761

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    MelGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Conditional Waveform Synthesis

    K. Kumar, R. Kumar, T. De Boissiere, L. Gestin, W. Teoh, J. Sotelo, L. Ai, M. A. De Brebisson, M. Bengio, and A. Courville, "MelGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Conditional Waveform Synthesis," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06711, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.06711

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  22. [22]

    StoRM: A Diffusion-Based Stochastic Regeneration Model for Speech Enhancement and Dereverberation,

    J.-M. Lemercier, J. Richter, S. Welker, and T. Gerkmann, "StoRM: A Diffusion-Based Stochastic Regeneration Model for Speech Enhancement and Dereverberation," IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 31, pp. 2724-2737, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2023.3294692

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Diffusion Models for Audio Restoration,

    J.-M. Lemercier, J. Richter, S. Welker, E. Moliner, V. Välimäki, and T. Gerkmann, "Diffusion Models for Audio Restoration," arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09821, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09821

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Fish-Speech: Leveraging Large Language Models for Advanced Multilingual Text-to-Speech Synthesis,

    S. Liao, Y. Wang, T. Li, Y. Cheng, R. Zhang, R. Zhou, and Y. Xing, "Fish-Speech: Leveraging Large Language Models for Advanced Multilingual Text-to-Speech Synthesis," arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.01156, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    AudioLDM: Text-to-Audio Generation with Latent Diffusion Models,

    H. Liu, Z. Chen, Y. Yuan, X. Mei, X. Liu, D. Mandic, W. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, "AudioLDM: Text-to-Audio Generation with Latent Diffusion Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12503, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12503

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    AudioLDM 2: Learning Holistic Audio Generation With Self-Supervised Pretraining,

    H. Liu, Y. Yuan, X. Liu, X. Mei, Q. Kong, Q. Tian, Y. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, "AudioLDM 2: Learning Holistic Audio Generation With Self-Supervised Pretraining," IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 2871-2883, 2024, doi: 10.1109/taslp.2024.3399607

    arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    A ConvNet for the 2020s,

    Z. Liu, H. Mao, C.-Y. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie, "A ConvNet for the 2020s," in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2022, pp. 11976-11986. [Online]. Available: https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/papers/Liu_A_Con vNet_for_the_2020s_CVPR_2022_paper.pdf

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    MP-SENet: A Speech Enhancement Model with Parallel Denoising of Magnitude and Phase Spectra,

    Y.-X. Lu, Y. Ai, and Z.-H. Ling, "MP-SENet: A Speech Enhancement Model with Parallel Denoising of Magnitude and Phase Spectra," in Proc. INTERSPEECH, 2023, doi: 10.21437/interspeech.2023-1441

    doi:10.21437/interspeech.2023-1441 2023

  29. [29]

    RePaint: Inpainting using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models,

    A. Lugmayr, M. Danelljan, A. Romero, F. Yu, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, "RePaint: Inpainting using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.09865, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09865

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Text-to-Speech (TTS) Glossary,

    Lyzr AI, "Text-to-Speech (TTS) Glossary," Lyzr AI, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.lyzr.ai/glossaries/text-to-speech/

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Finite Scalar Quantization: VQ-VAE Made Simple,

    F. Mentzer, D. Minnen, E. Agustsson, and M. Tschannen, "Finite Scalar Quantization: VQ-VAE Made Simple," arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15505, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15505

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    How do diffusion models compare to score-based generative models?

    Milvus, "How do diffusion models compare to score-based generative models?" Milvus.io, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://milvus.io/ai- quick-reference/how-do-diffusion-models-compare-to-scorebased- generative-models

    work page

  33. [33]

    Polyffusion: A Diffusion Model for Polyphonic Score Generation with Internal and External Controls

    L. Min, J. Jiang, G. Xia, and J. Zhao, "Polyffusion: A Diffusion Model for Polyphonic Score Generation with Internal and External Controls," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10304, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10304

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Diffusion-Based Audio Inpainting,

    E. Moliner and V. Välimäki, "Diffusion-Based Audio Inpainting," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 100-113, 2024, doi: 10.17743/jaes.2022.0129

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Audio-Visual Speech Inpainting with Deep Learning

    G. Morrone, D. Michelsanti, Z.-H. Tan, and J. Jensen, "Audio-Visual Speech Inpainting with Deep Learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04556, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04556

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models,

    A. Nichol and P. Dhariwal, "Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09672, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09672

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer,

    E. Perez, F. Strub, H. de Vries, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville, "FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer," arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.07871, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07871

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Multi-modal song mood detection with deep learning,

    K. Pyrovolakis, P. Tzouveli, and G. Stamou, "Multi-modal song mood detection with deep learning," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 1065, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22031065

    work page doi:10.3390/s22031065 2022

  39. [39]

    Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2,

    A. Razavi, A. van den Oord, and O. Vinyals, "Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2," arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00446, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00446

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  40. [40]

    Investigating Training Objectives for Generative Speech Enhancement

    J. Richter, S. Welker, J.-M. Lemercier, B. Lay, E. Moliner, and T. Gerkmann, "Investigating Training Objectives for Generative Speech Enhancement," arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10753, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10753

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    High- Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, "High- Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10752, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10752

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying,

    S. Jelassi, D. Brandfonbrener, S. Kakade, and E. Malach, "Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying," in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), 2024. [Online]. Available: https://icml.cc/virtual/2024/poster/33527

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications,

    S. S. Sengar, A. B. Hasan, S. Kumar, and F. Carroll, "Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications," Multimedia Tools Appl., Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11042-024-20016- 1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11042-024-20016- 2024

  44. [45]

    The Impact of Voice APIs on Modern Communication,

    SkySwitch, "The Impact of Voice APIs on Modern Communication," SkySwitch Blog, Mar. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://skyswitch.com/blog/the-impact-of-voice-apis-on-modern- communication/

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    Don’t Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Size,

    S. L. Smith, P.-J. Kindermans, C. Ying, and Q. V. Le, "Don’t Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Size," arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00489, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00489

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [47]

    Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics,

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. A. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, "Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics," arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03585, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03585

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [48]

    Improved Parallel Wavegan Vocoder with Perceptually Weighted Spectrogram Loss,

    E. Song, R. Yamamoto, M.-J. Hwang, J.-S. Kim, O. Kwon, and J.-M. Kim, "Improved Parallel Wavegan Vocoder with Perceptually Weighted Spectrogram Loss," in Proc. IEEE Spoken Lang. Technol. Workshop (SLT), 2021, doi: 10.1109/slt48900.2021.9383549

    arXiv 2021

  48. [49]

    A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch,

    S. S. Stevens, "A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 185, 1937, doi: 10.1121/1.1915893

    work page doi:10.1121/1.1915893 1937

  49. [50]

    RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding,

    J. Su, Y. Lu, S.-F. Pan, B. Wen, and Y. Liu, "RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding," arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09864, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09864

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutions,

    R. Suvorov, E. Logacheva, A. Mashikhin, A. Remizova, A. Ashukha, A. Silvestrov, N. Kong, H. Goka, K. Park, and V. Lempitsky, "Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07161, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [53]

    Mamba-SEUNet: Mamba UNet for Monaural Speech Enhancement

    J. Wang, Z. Lin, T. Wang, M. Ge, L. Wang, and J. Dang, "Mamba- SEUNet: Mamba UNet for Monaural Speech Enhancement," arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16626, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    Diffusion Gaussian Mixture Audio Denoise

    P. Wang, S. Li, J. Li, L. Guo, and Y. Zhang, "Diffusion Gaussian Mixture Audio Denoise," arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09154, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09154

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [55]

    AUDIT: Audio Editing by Following Instructions with Latent Diffusion Models

    Y. Wang, Z. Ju, X. Tan, L. He, Z. Wu, J. Bian, and S. Zhao, "AUDIT: Audio Editing by Following Instructions with Latent Diffusion Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.00830, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00830

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [56]

    ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders,

    S. Woo, S. Debnath, R. Hu, X. Chen, Z. Liu, I. S. Kweon, and S. Xie, "ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders," arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00808, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00808

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [57]

    CSTR VCTK Corpus: English Multi-speaker Corpus for CSTR Voice Cloning Toolkit (version 0.92),

    J. Yamagishi, C. Veaux, and K. MacDonald, "CSTR VCTK Corpus: English Multi-speaker Corpus for CSTR Voice Cloning Toolkit (version 0.92)," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2645

    doi:10.7488/ds/2645 2019

  56. [58]

    Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications,

    L. Yang, Z. Zhang, Y. Song, S. Hong, R. Xu, Y. Zhao, W. Zhang, B. Cui, and M.-H. Yang, "Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1- 39, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3626235

    doi:10.1145/3626235 2023

  57. [59]

    SoundStream: An End-to-End Neural Audio Codec,

    N. Zeghidour, A. Luebs, A. Omran, J. Skoglund, and M. Tagliasacchi, "SoundStream: An End-to-End Neural Audio Codec," arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03312, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03312

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [60]

    Entropy-Driven Sampling and Training Scheme for Conditional Diffusion Generation,

    G. Zheng, S. Li, H. Wang, T. Yao, Y. Chen, S. Ding, and X. Li, "Entropy-Driven Sampling and Training Scheme for Conditional Diffusion Generation," in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV), 2022, pp. 754-769, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20047-2_43

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20047-2_43 2022

  59. [2022]

    Diffiner: A Versatile Diffusion-based Generative Refiner for Speech Enhancement

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17287

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.