pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2509.14005 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-17 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for Higgs bosons produced in association with a high-energy photon via vector-boson fusion and decaying to a pair of b-quarks in the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords Higgs bosonvector-boson fusionb-quarksATLASphotonsignal strengthStandard Model
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ATLAS experiment measures a Higgs boson signal strength of 0.2 ± 0.7 relative to the Standard Model in the high-energy photon plus vector-boson fusion to b-quark channel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents an updated search for Standard Model Higgs bosons produced in association with a high-energy photon and decaying to a pair of b-quarks, using 133 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV proton-proton data collected by the ATLAS detector. The selection focuses on vector-boson fusion production, the dominant mode in this final state, while the photon requirement helps suppress multijet backgrounds. Key improvements include refined background modeling, a neural-network classifier for signal-background separation, and a direct binned-likelihood fit to the classifier output instead of earlier methods. The resulting signal strength of 0.2 ± 0.7 corresponds to an observed significance of only 0.3 standard deviations against 1.5 expected under the Standard Model. A reader would care because this result tightens constraints on Higgs production mechanisms involving photons and vector bosons, testing whether the particle behaves exactly as predicted.

Core claim

The paper establishes that, after applying improved background characterization, a neural-network classifier, and a binned-likelihood fit directly to the classifier output, the measured Higgs boson signal strength in the photon-associated vector-boson fusion to bb channel is 0.2 ± 0.7 relative to the Standard Model prediction, yielding an observed significance of 0.3 standard deviations compared to an expectation of 1.5 standard deviations.

What carries the argument

Neural-network classifier whose output is fitted in bins via a likelihood function to extract the signal strength while modeling backgrounds.

If this is right

  • The measured value remains compatible with the Standard Model within uncertainties.
  • Improved background modeling and the neural-network approach reduce the impact of systematic effects on the final result.
  • The analysis sets the stage for higher-sensitivity searches with additional collision data at the LHC.
  • Limits on deviations in the Higgs coupling to vector bosons can be derived from this channel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same classifier-plus-fit strategy could be ported to other rare Higgs production modes to reduce reliance on cut-based selections.
  • Combining this result with other Higgs measurements would tighten global constraints on possible new physics contributions to photon-associated production.
  • Null outcomes in this channel help prioritize which production mechanisms deserve the most attention in future runs.

Load-bearing premise

The neural-network classifier output and background model accurately represent the data without significant mismodeling or bias that would distort the extracted signal strength in the binned likelihood fit.

What would settle it

A larger dataset or refined analysis yielding a measured signal strength inconsistent with 0.2 within the stated uncertainty or an observed significance significantly exceeding the expected 1.5 standard deviations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.14005 by ATLAS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative Feynman diagrams for (a) non-resonant multijet background and (b) 𝐻𝛾 𝑗 𝑗 signal. The non-resonant multijet background can also have a 𝑞𝑔 initial state, and the photon can be radiated from an initial-state or final-state quark. analysis technique has been markedly improved, replacing the previously used boosted decision tree (BDT) classifier with a densely connected neural network (NN) and in… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NN output distributions for data compared with those for all MC backgrounds with and without kinematic reweighting. Reweighting scale factors are extracted from comparisons between kinematic distributions for MC backgrounds and data in the (a) control region 𝑚𝑏𝑏 sidebands. The low score bins of the (b) signal region, which have negligible signal, are used for validation. The purple dashed line marks the di… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Post-fit plots for the observed dataset, showing (a) the control region and (b) the signal region. Background and signal templates are shown with all normalization factors and post-fit nuisance parameter pulls incorporated. Data bin yields are represented with black markers, with error bars representing statistical uncertainties. The red line represents the post-fit signal scaled by a factor of 25, while t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Post-fit signal region 𝑚𝑏𝑏 distributions in slices of NN score. Stacked histograms represent post-fit MC background and signal, and the black markers with error bars represent data. The red lines represent post-fit signal distributions scaled by a factor of 100. The stacked red histogram, which can only be visualized in some bins of the highest NN score slice, is normalized to the post-fit signal strength,… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A search for Standard Model Higgs bosons produced in association with a high-energy photon and decaying to $b\bar{b}$ is performed using 133 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The photon requirement reduces the multijet background, and the $H \rightarrow b\bar b$ decay is the dominant decay mode. Event selection requirements target events produced by vector-boson fusion, the dominant production mode in this channel. Several improvements enhance the search sensitivity compared to previous measurements. These improvements include better background modelling and characterization, the use of a neural-network classifier, and an updated signal extraction strategy adopting a direct binned-likelihood fit to the classifier output. With these improvements, the Higgs boson signal strength is measured to be $0.2 \pm 0.7$ relative to the Standard Model prediction. This corresponds to an observed significance of $0.3$ standard deviations, compared to an expectation of $1.5$ standard deviations assuming the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for Standard Model Higgs bosons produced in association with a high-energy photon via vector-boson fusion and decaying to a pair of b-quarks. Using 133 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV ATLAS pp collision data, the analysis applies VBF-targeted event selection, a neural-network classifier, and extracts the Higgs signal strength via a direct binned-likelihood fit to the classifier output, yielding a measured value of 0.2 ± 0.7 relative to the SM prediction (observed significance 0.3σ versus 1.5σ expected).

Significance. If the central result holds, the work provides an updated constraint on the VBF+γ, H→bb channel and demonstrates incremental gains from refined background modeling and machine-learning classification. The low expected significance underscores the statistical limitations of this final state, so the primary value lies in methodological refinements that could inform future analyses rather than in a high-precision measurement or discovery.

major comments (1)
  1. The binned-likelihood fit to the neural-network classifier output (described in the signal extraction strategy) is load-bearing for the quoted signal strength of 0.2 ± 0.7. The abstract states that background modelling has been improved, yet the manuscript must supply quantitative validation—such as data-to-background agreement plots or χ² tests in the high-score region of the classifier distribution—to demonstrate that residual mismodeling (e.g., from multijet or other backgrounds after VBF+photon selection) does not bias the fitted signal strength or its uncertainty.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief quantitative statement of the sensitivity gain relative to the previous measurement to help readers gauge the impact of the listed improvements.
  2. Notation for the neural-network output variable should be defined explicitly at first use in the text and figures for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of background validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The binned-likelihood fit to the neural-network classifier output (described in the signal extraction strategy) is load-bearing for the quoted signal strength of 0.2 ± 0.7. The abstract states that background modelling has been improved, yet the manuscript must supply quantitative validation—such as data-to-background agreement plots or χ² tests in the high-score region of the classifier distribution—to demonstrate that residual mismodeling (e.g., from multijet or other backgrounds after VBF+photon selection) does not bias the fitted signal strength or its uncertainty.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative validation of the background model in the high-score region of the neural-network classifier is valuable for supporting the robustness of the signal extraction. The current manuscript presents data-to-simulation comparisons in several control regions used to constrain the background normalizations and shapes, together with the full set of systematic uncertainties propagated in the fit. In the revised version we will add a dedicated figure showing the post-fit classifier output distribution restricted to the high-score region (score > 0.8), with data overlaid on the total background prediction and the fitted signal component. We will also include the χ² per degree of freedom for the agreement between data and the background-only hypothesis in that region. These additions will directly demonstrate that residual mismodeling does not introduce a significant bias in the extracted signal strength of 0.2 ± 0.7. The binned-likelihood fit already incorporates nuisance parameters for background shape uncertainties derived from data-driven methods and from simulation variations, which further mitigate potential mismodeling effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct binned-likelihood fit to experimental data

full rationale

The paper reports a signal-strength measurement extracted via a binned-likelihood fit to the neural-network classifier output in 133 fb^{-1} of collision data. This is a standard statistical extraction comparing observed distributions against Monte Carlo templates for signal and background; the fitted value (0.2 ± 0.7) is not defined in terms of itself by any equation in the paper, nor does any central result reduce to a self-citation or ansatz that was fitted to the same quantity. The background-modeling improvements and classifier are inputs to the fit, not outputs renamed as predictions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard particle-physics assumptions about Monte Carlo modeling and detector response rather than new free parameters or invented entities beyond the fitted signal strength.

free parameters (1)
  • Higgs signal strength = 0.2
    Parameter of interest extracted via binned likelihood fit to the neural-network classifier output.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model predictions for Higgs production cross sections, branching ratios, and kinematic distributions are sufficiently accurate for normalization and shape templates.
    Invoked to define the expected signal yield and shape in the fit.
  • domain assumption Background processes are correctly modeled in simulation and data-driven estimates after the photon and VBF selection.
    Required for the background template used in the likelihood fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1443 out tokens · 56998 ms · 2026-05-18T16:25:08.924926+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Asking for an extra photon in Higgs production at the LHC and beyond

    E. Gabrielli, B. Mele, F. Piccinini, and R. Pittau, Asking for an extra photon in Higgs production at the LHC and beyond, JHEP07(2016) 003, arXiv:1601.03635 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quarks from vector boson fusion production with the ATLAS experiment at√𝑠=13TeV , Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 537, arXiv:2011.08280 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of boosted Higgs bosons produced via vector boson fusion or gluon fusion in the𝐻→𝑏 ¯𝑏decay mode using LHC proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP12(2024) 035, arXiv:2407.08012 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson production in association with a high-energy photon via vector-boson fusion with decay into bottom quark pairs at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP03(2021) 268, arXiv:2010.13651 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Denby,Neural networks and cellular automata in experimental high energy physics, Comput

    B. Denby,Neural networks and cellular automata in experimental high energy physics, Comput. Phys. Commun.49(1988) 429

    work page 1988

  8. [8]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Herwig++ Physics and Manual

    M. Bähr et al.,Herwig++ physics and manual, Eur. Phys. J. C58(2008) 639, arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Herwig 7.0 / Herwig++ 3.0 Release Note

    J. Bellm et al.,Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 196, arXiv:1512.01178 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001, arXiv:1510.03865 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball, et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    R. D. Ball et al.,The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III, J. Phys. G49(2022) 080501, arXiv:2203.05506 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    work page arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Configuration and performance of the ATLAS𝑏-jet triggers in Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1087, arXiv:2106.03584 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    work page arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 581, arXiv:1510.03823 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Forward jet vertex tagging using the particle flow algorithm, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-026, 2019,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2683100

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS flavour-tagging algorithms for the LHC Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision dataset, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 681, arXiv:2211.16345 [physics.data-an]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS 𝑏-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with𝑡¯𝑡 events in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 970, arXiv:1907.05120 [hep-ex]. 20

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝑐-jet mistagging efficiency in𝑡¯𝑡events using𝑝 𝑝 collision data at√𝑠=13TeV collected with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 95, arXiv:2109.10627 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of the light-flavour jet mistagging efficiency of the𝑏-tagging algorithms with𝑍+jets events using139fb −1 of ATLAS proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 728, arXiv:2301.06319 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Flavor Tagging Efficiency Parametrisations with Graph Neural Networks, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-041, 2022,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2825433

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration,New techniques for jet calibration with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 761, arXiv:2303.17312 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv:1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 292, arXiv:1603.05598 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Chollet et al.,Keras, 2015,url:https://keras.io

    F. Chollet et al.,Keras, 2015,url:https://keras.io

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Martín Abadi et al.,TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, Software available from tensorflow.org, 2015,url:https://www.tensorflow.org/

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, Uncertainties on𝛼𝑆 in global PDF analyses and implications for predicted hadronic cross sections, Eur. Phys. J. C64(2009) 653, arXiv:0905.3531 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of electroweak production of two jets in association with an isolated photon and missing transverse momentum, and search for a Higgs boson decaying into invisible particles at13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 105, arXiv:2109.00925 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations

    M. Botje et al.,The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations, 2011, arXiv:1101.0538 [hep-ph],url:https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0538

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 689, arXiv:2007.02645 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Cranmer, G

    K. Cranmer, G. Lewis, L. Moneta, A. Shibata, and W. Verkerke, HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats, (2012), url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1456844

    work page arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    The RooFit toolkit for data modeling

    W. Verkerke and D. Kirkby,The RooFit toolkit for data modeling, 2003, arXiv:physics/0306116 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  53. [53]

    W. A. Rolke, A. M. López, and J. Conrad, Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A551(2005) 493, ed. by L. Lyons and M. Karagoz, arXiv:physics/0403059. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2922210. 22 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 105, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 124, S. Abdelhameed 120a, K. Abeling 56, N.J. Abicht 50, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 46, A. Aboulhorma 36e, H. Abramowicz 158, Y. Abulaiti 121, B.S. Acharya 70a,70b,o, A. ...

    work page arXiv 2025