arxiv: 2509.14070 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-17 · ✦ hep-ex

Observation of W⁺W⁻γ production in pp collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords WW gamma productiontriboson productionanomalous quartic gauge couplingseffective field theorydimension-8 operatorsATLAS experimentLHC collisionscross section measurement

0 comments

The pith

ATLAS observes W+W−γ production with 5.9 sigma significance and measures its cross-section in agreement with the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the first observation of W+ W- gamma triboson production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. The analysis selects events with an electron-muon pair, a high-energy photon, and missing transverse momentum from 140 inverse femtobarns of data at 13 TeV. The signal is seen at 5.9 standard deviations above background expectations. The measured cross-section of 6.2 fb matches the predicted 6.1 fb within uncertainties. Limits are placed on 13 dimension-8 operators that could signal new physics via anomalous quartic gauge boson couplings.

Core claim

The ATLAS detector observes W+W−γ production in 140 fb−1 of 13 TeV pp collisions. Events containing an opposite-charge electron-muon pair, a high transverse-momentum photon, and significant missing transverse momentum are analyzed. The observed significance reaches 5.9 standard deviations, and the fiducial cross-section for the e±μ∓νν̄γ final state is measured to be 6.2 ± 0.8 (stat.) ± 0.6 (sys.) fb, consistent with the Standard Model expectation of 6.1 +1.0 −0.7 fb. Using the effective field theory approach, constraints are set on the Wilson coefficients of thirteen dimension-8 operators describing anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings.

What carries the argument

The effective field theory framework with dimension-8 operators for anomalous quartic gauge couplings, combined with the fiducial selection in the eμννγ final state and background estimation from simulation and control regions.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the Standard Model background processes are accurately modeled by simulation in the signal and control regions and that the effective field theory description remains valid without higher-order effects in the selected phase space.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the fiducial cross-section that deviates by more than three standard deviations from the Standard Model prediction using an independent dataset or analysis method would undermine the reported agreement.

read the original abstract

This Letter reports the observation of $W^{+}W^{-}\gamma$ triboson production in 140 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS detector from proton--proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV at the LHC. Events with an opposite-charge $e\mu$ pair, a high transverse-momentum photon, and significant missing transverse momentum are considered. The observed (expected) significance of the signal is 5.9 (6.0) standard deviations. The measured fiducial cross-section, defined for the $W^{+}W^{-}\gamma\to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu\bar{\nu}\gamma$ final state is 6.2 $\pm$ 0.8 (stat.) $\pm$ 0.6 (sys.) fb, in good agreement with the Standard Model prediction of 6.1$^{\,+1.0}_{-0.7}$ fb. Constraints on the Wilson coefficients of 13 dimension-8 operators describing physics beyond the Standard Model through anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings are derived using the effective field theory framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ATLAS reports the first observation of WWgamma at 5.9 sigma plus new dim-8 EFT limits, with cross-section agreement that looks reasonable on the surface.

read the letter

The main things to know are that this is the first observation of W+W- gamma production and the first constraints on those 13 specific dimension-8 operators in this final state. The observed significance hits 5.9 sigma against 6.0 expected, and the fiducial cross section comes out at 6.2 ± 0.8 stat ± 0.6 sys fb, right in line with the SM prediction of 6.1 +1.0 -0.7 fb using 140 fb-1 at 13 TeV. That agreement is the strongest part of the result on a quick read. The analysis uses a straightforward opposite-sign e mu plus high-pT photon plus MET selection, which is standard for this kind of triboson search. They then fit the data for the Wilson coefficients in the EFT framework, which is the natural next step once you have a signal. The paper does a clean job separating the observation claim from the EFT interpretation. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags: background modeling in the high-pT photon and MET tails. The dominant backgrounds are W gamma plus jets and similar processes with misidentification, and the result hinges on MC plus control-region normalizations getting both the yield and the shapes right in the signal region. If the extrapolation from control regions misses higher-order QCD or photon identification effects, the significance could shift. The close observed-to-expected match helps, but it does not fully replace detailed validation plots that a referee would want to see. This paper is for experimentalists and theorists who follow diboson and triboson measurements or EFT constraints at the LHC. A reader who needs the latest number on this process or the updated limits will get direct value from it. It is a standard LHC observation paper with a clear new result, so it deserves a serious referee even if the EFT section needs extra scrutiny on the operator basis and validity range.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This Letter reports the observation of W⁺W⁻γ triboson production in 140 fb⁻¹ of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector. Events are selected in the opposite-sign eμ + high-pT γ + MET final state. The observed (expected) significance is 5.9 (6.0) σ. The measured fiducial cross section for W⁺W⁻γ → e±μ∓νν̄γ is 6.2 ± 0.8 (stat.) ± 0.6 (sys.) fb, in agreement with the SM prediction of 6.1 +1.0 −0.7 fb. Constraints on the Wilson coefficients of 13 dimension-8 operators are extracted in the EFT framework for anomalous quartic gauge couplings.

Significance. If the background modeling holds, the result constitutes the first observation of this rare triboson process and supplies new limits on aQGCs. The direct comparison of a measured fiducial cross section to an independent SM prediction, together with the EFT fit, adds a useful data point to the ATLAS multiboson program and tests the validity of the dimension-8 EFT description in the selected kinematic region.

major comments (2)

[Background Estimation] The 5.9 σ observed significance and the extracted cross section both depend on the accuracy of the background prediction (primarily Wγ+jets, Zγ, and diboson processes with misidentified objects) after control-region normalizations. The manuscript must demonstrate that the control regions sufficiently constrain the high-pT photon tail and MET spectrum in the signal region; otherwise the extrapolation uncertainty could bias the excess. Please add explicit validation plots and a quantitative breakdown of the extrapolation uncertainty in the background-estimation section.
[EFT Interpretation] The EFT constraints on the 13 dimension-8 operators are derived from a fit to the selected kinematic distributions. The manuscript should state the range of validity assumed for the EFT expansion and quantify any truncation effects or unitarity bounds that could affect the reported limits.

minor comments (1)

[Event Selection] Clarify the exact pT(γ) threshold and MET requirement used in the signal-region definition for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and positive assessment of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the presentation of the background estimation and EFT interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Background Estimation] The 5.9 σ observed significance and the extracted cross section both depend on the accuracy of the background prediction (primarily Wγ+jets, Zγ, and diboson processes with misidentified objects) after control-region normalizations. The manuscript must demonstrate that the control regions sufficiently constrain the high-pT photon tail and MET spectrum in the signal region; otherwise the extrapolation uncertainty could bias the excess. Please add explicit validation plots and a quantitative breakdown of the extrapolation uncertainty in the background-estimation section.

Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the background extrapolation is important to support the claimed significance and cross-section result. The control regions are constructed to constrain the normalizations of the dominant backgrounds, including Wγ+jets, and the extrapolation to the signal region is performed using simulation shapes. In the revised manuscript we add validation plots that directly compare data and background predictions in the control regions for the high-pT photon and missing transverse momentum distributions. We also include a quantitative breakdown showing that the extrapolation uncertainty is 4–6 % and is already accounted for in the total systematic uncertainty quoted for the cross-section measurement. These additions appear in the updated background-estimation section and associated supplemental material. revision: yes
Referee: [EFT Interpretation] The EFT constraints on the 13 dimension-8 operators are derived from a fit to the selected kinematic distributions. The manuscript should state the range of validity assumed for the EFT expansion and quantify any truncation effects or unitarity bounds that could affect the reported limits.

Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The EFT fit is performed in the kinematic regime of the selected events, where the typical energy scale is well below the cutoff of the effective theory. In the revised manuscript we explicitly state that the limits are derived under the assumption that the new-physics scale Λ satisfies Λ ≳ 1 TeV. Truncation effects from higher-dimensional operators are suppressed by additional powers of 1/Λ² and are neglected in the present analysis; we note that their inclusion would require a global fit beyond the scope of this Letter. Unitarity bounds are addressed by restricting the scanned range of Wilson coefficients to values that preserve perturbative unitarity up to scales of several TeV, as verified through partial-wave analysis. This discussion is now included in the EFT section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct data measurement vs independent SM prediction

full rationale

The central claims are an observed excess yielding 5.9σ significance and a fiducial cross-section extracted from data in the eμ + high-pT γ + MET region. These are compared to an external Standard Model prediction computed from theory (6.1 fb). EFT constraints on dimension-8 Wilson coefficients are obtained by fitting the same data. No equation or step defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fit as a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain for the load-bearing result. Background modeling uses simulation normalized in control regions, but this is an external assumption subject to validation and does not create definitional circularity. The result remains falsifiable against independent theory calculations and future data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement relies on standard LHC luminosity, detector response modeling, and background simulation assumptions that are not derived in the paper itself.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard Model background processes are accurately modeled by Monte Carlo simulation and control-region extrapolation.
Required for signal extraction and significance calculation.
domain assumption The effective field theory truncation at dimension-8 is sufficient to describe possible deviations in the selected phase space.
Basis for interpreting limits on Wilson coefficients.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5748 in / 1341 out tokens · 52669 ms · 2026-05-18T16:18:36.764819+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

[1]

Quartic Gauge Boson Couplings

S. Godfrey,Quartic gauge boson couplings, AIP Conf. Proc.350(1995) 209, ed. by U. Baur, S. Errede and T. Mueller, arXiv:hep-ph/9505252

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[2]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

work page 2008
[3]

CMS Collaboration,The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST3(2008) S08004

work page 2008
[4]

O. S. Brüning et al.,LHC Design Report, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Geneva: CERN, 2004,url:http://cds.cern.ch/record/782076

work page 2004
[5]

ATLAS Collaboration,Study of𝑊𝑊 𝛾and𝑊 𝑍 𝛾production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=8TeV and search for anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 646, arXiv:1707.05597 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[6]

CMS Collaboration,Search for𝑊𝑊 𝛾 and 𝑊 𝑍 𝛾production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 032008, arXiv:1404.4619 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[7]

CMS Collaboration,Observation of𝑊𝑊 𝛾Production and Search for𝐻𝛾Production in Proton–Proton Collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 121901, arXiv:2310.05164 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of𝑊𝑊𝑊Production in𝑝 𝑝Collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 061803, arXiv:2201.13045 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

CMS Collaboration,Observation of the production of three massive gauge bosons at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 151802, arXiv:2006.11191 [hep-ex]. 19

work page arXiv 2020
[10]

ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of𝑊 𝛾𝛾triboson production in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138400, arXiv:2308.03041 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of the𝑝 𝑝→𝑊 ±𝛾𝛾and𝑝 𝑝→𝑍 𝛾𝛾cross sections at√𝑠=13TeV and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, JHEP10(2021) 174, arXiv:2105.12780 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of𝑍 𝛾𝛾production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 539, arXiv:2211.14171 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of𝑊 𝑍 𝛾Production in𝑝 𝑝Collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 021802, arXiv:2305.16994 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

CMS Collaboration,Observation of𝑊 𝑍 𝛾production and constraints on new physics scenarios in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 012009, arXiv:2503.21977 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of𝑉𝑉 𝑍production at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, (2024), arXiv:2412.15123 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

O. J. P. Éboli and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia,Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 093013, arXiv:1604.03555 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[18]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, 2021,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2767187

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2015
[20]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[21]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

work page 2003
[23]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[24]

A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[25]

ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

work page arXiv 2016
[26]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[27]

Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]. 20

work page arXiv 2019
[28]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[29]

Comix, a new matrix element generator

T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12(2008) 039, arXiv:0808.3674 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[30]

Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur

F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[31]

Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[32]

Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212(2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[33]

A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03(2008) 038, arXiv:0709.1027 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[34]

A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[35]

QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv:1207.5030 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[36]

QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[37]

QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[38]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[39]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[40]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014
[41]

Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations

S. Frixione, E. Laenen, P. Motylinski and B. R. Webber,Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP04(2007) 081, arXiv:hep-ph/0702198

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[42]

Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations

P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP03(2013) 015, arXiv:1212.3460 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[43]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the charge asymmetry in top-quark pair production in association with a photon with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 137848, arXiv:2212.10552 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]. 21

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[45]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[46]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[47]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[48]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168

work page arXiv 2016
[49]

ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

work page arXiv 2015
[50]

ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv:1908.00005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[51]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv:2012.00578 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[54]

The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[55]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[56]

ATLAS Collaboration,Tagging and suppression of pileup jets with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-018, 2014,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1700870

work page arXiv 2014
[57]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS 𝑏-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with𝑡¯𝑡 events in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 970, arXiv:1907.05120 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[58]

ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of the light-flavour jet mistagging efficiency of the𝑏-tagging algorithms with𝑍+jets events using139fb −1 of ATLAS proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 728, arXiv:2301.06319 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS flavour-tagging algorithms for the LHC Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision dataset, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 681, arXiv:2211.16345 [physics.data-an]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 903, arXiv:1802.08168 [hep-ex]. 22

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[61]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for flavour-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the photon with the ATLAS detector at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137379, arXiv:2205.02537 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of Single-Top-Quark Production in Association with a Photon Using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 181901, arXiv:2302.01283 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of𝑡¯𝑡𝛾 production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2024) 191, arXiv:2403.09452 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

A simple alternative to the Crystal Ball function

S. Das,A simple alternative to the Crystal Ball function, (2016), arXiv:1603.08591 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[65]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of𝑍 𝛾+jets differential cross sections in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2023) 072, arXiv:2212.07184 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

T. Chen and C. Guestrin,XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, (2016), arXiv:1603.02754 [cs.LG]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[67]

Stone,Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)36(1974) 111

M. Stone,Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)36(1974) 111

work page 1974
[68]

James et al.,An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R, New York, NY: Springer, 2013,isbn: 978-1-4614-7137-0

G. James et al.,An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R, New York, NY: Springer, 2013,isbn: 978-1-4614-7137-0

work page 2013
[69]

ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 689, arXiv:2007.02645 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[70]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 581, arXiv:1510.03823 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[71]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝑐-jet mistagging efficiency in𝑡¯𝑡events using𝑝 𝑝 collision data at√𝑠=13TeV collected with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 95, arXiv:2109.10627 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[72]

Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

work page 2018
[73]

PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001, arXiv:1510.03865 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[74]

M. Aly, T. Dado, A. Held, M. Pinamonti and L. Valery,TRExFitter, (2025), url:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15642614

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15642614 2025
[75]

ROOT Collaboration, HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats, tech. rep. CERN-OPEN-2012-016, New York U., 2012, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1456844

work page arXiv 2012
[76]

The RooFit toolkit for data modeling

W. Verkerke and D. Kirkby,The RooFit toolkit for data modeling, 2003, arXiv:physics/0306116 [physics.data-an]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[77]

Pinto et al.,Uncertainty components in profile likelihood fits, Eur

A. Pinto et al.,Uncertainty components in profile likelihood fits, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 593, arXiv:2307.04007 [physics.data-an]. 23

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2501

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[79]

ATLAS Collaboration,𝑍 𝑍→ℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− cross-section measurements and search for anomalous triple gauge couplings in13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 032005, arXiv:1709.07703 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[80]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of𝑍 𝑍production in theℓℓ𝜈𝜈final state with the ATLAS detector in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, JHEP10(2019) 127, arXiv:1905.07163 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.