REVIEW 8 cited by
TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
read the original abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on factoid question answering, they are still prone to hallucination and untruthful responses, particularly when tasks demand information outside their parametric knowledge. Indeed, truthfulness requires more than accuracy -- models must also recognize uncertainty and abstain when unsure to avoid hallucinations. This presents a fundamental challenge for existing methods: approaches that optimize for accuracy often amplify hallucinations, while those that encourage abstention can become overly conservative, sacrificing correct answers. Both extremes ultimately compromise truthfulness. In this work, we present TruthRL, a general reinforcement learning (RL) framework that directly optimizes the truthfulness of LLMs. Specifically, we implement TruthRL using GRPO with a simple yet effective ternary reward that distinguishes correct answers, hallucinations, and abstentions. It incentivizes models to reduce hallucinations not only by providing correct responses, but also by enabling abstention when uncertain, thereby improving truthfulness. Extensive experiments across four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that TruthRL significantly reduces hallucinations (e.g., 43.5% $\rightarrow$ 19.4%) and improves truthfulness (e.g., 5.3% $\rightarrow$ 37.2%), with consistent gains across various backbone models. Analysis shows that the improvement of TruthRL arises from enhanced capability of LLMs to recognize their knowledge boundary, hence avoiding being overly conservative as the baselines are.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Reflect-R1: Evidence-Driven Reflection for Self-Correction in Long Video Understanding
Reflect-R1 introduces the first evidence-driven self-correction framework for long video understanding using a three-stage pipeline, stage-decoupled RL via SD-GRPO, and a 120K dataset to achieve SOTA on VideoMME and L...
-
Beyond Reasoning: Reinforcement Learning Unlocks Parametric Knowledge in LLMs
RL on binary rewards boosts LLM factual recall by ~27% relative across models by redistributing probability mass to latent correct answers rather than acquiring new knowledge.
-
BAS: A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Evaluating Large Language Model Confidence
BAS aggregates utility from an answer-or-abstain model across risk thresholds and is uniquely maximized by truthful confidence estimates.
-
Beyond Variance: Prompt-Efficient RLVR via Rare-Event Amplification and Bidirectional Pairing
Positive-negative prompt pairing with weighted GRPO improves RLVR sample efficiency, raising AIME 2025 Pass@8 from 16.8 to 22.2 on Qwen2.5-Math-7B while matching large-scale training.
-
Reflect-R1: Evidence-Driven Reflection for Self-Correction in Long Video Understanding
Reflect-R1 proposes an evidence-retrieval three-stage pipeline with SD-GRPO reinforcement learning and a new 120K dataset that claims SOTA results on VideoMME and LongVideoBench by grounding self-correction in objecti...
-
Reflect-R1: Evidence-Driven Reflection for Self-Correction in Long Video Understanding
Reflect-R1 introduces an evidence-driven intuition-verification-arbitration pipeline plus stage-decoupled RL (SD-GRPO) and a 120K dataset to enable grounded self-correction in long video models, claiming SOTA results.
-
AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction
AIPO adds active multi-agent consultation (Verify, Knowledge, Reasoning agents) plus custom importance sampling to RLVR training so LLMs expand their reasoning boundary and then operate without the agents.
-
AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction
AIPO trains LLMs to expand their reasoning capability boundary via active multi-agent interaction with Verify, Knowledge, and Reasoning agents during RLVR, using importance sampling and clipping to handle feedback, th...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.