arxiv: 2510.18958 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-21 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Sensitivity forecasts for gravitational-wave detectors to dark matter decaying into gravitons

Jose A. R. Cembranos , \'Alvaro Cendal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc

keywords dark mattergravitational wavesstochastic backgroundultralight dark mattergraviton decaysensitivity forecastscosmological constraints

0 comments

The pith

Ultralight dark matter decaying into gravitons produces a stochastic gravitational-wave background that current and future detectors can reach.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops model-independent predictions for the stochastic gravitational-wave background generated when ultralight dark matter decays directly into gravitons. This framework calculates the expected signal strength and frequency spectrum using only general decay properties that stay consistent with existing bounds on dark matter stability. The authors then compare these predictions to the sensitivity curves of operating and planned gravitational-wave detectors to forecast detection prospects. A confirmed signal would supply an independent gravitational-wave route to testing dark matter lifetime that differs from direct searches or cosmic-ray observations.

Core claim

The decay of ultralight dark matter into gravitons generates a stochastic gravitational-wave background whose amplitude and spectral shape can be predicted in a model-independent manner, and the resulting signal lies within the reach of current and forthcoming gravitational-wave observatories for viable ranges of dark matter mass and lifetime.

What carries the argument

The model-independent integration of the energy density in gravitational waves emitted by the two-body decay of ultralight dark matter particles into gravitons over cosmic history.

If this is right

Non-observation of the predicted background would place new upper bounds on the lifetime of ultralight dark matter against graviton emission.
Detection in a specific frequency window would directly indicate the mass scale of the decaying dark matter component.
The same framework supplies forecasts for how improved detector sensitivity in different bands expands the testable parameter space.
The signal provides a gravitational-wave complement to existing limits from the cosmic microwave background on decaying dark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extending the same decay calculation to partially visible channels would scale the gravitational-wave amplitude downward and alter required detector sensitivities.
Pulsar timing arrays could probe lower dark matter masses than ground-based interferometers if the lifetime permits a nanohertz signal.
Combining these forecasts with direct detection experiments would test whether the model-independent decay assumption survives in concrete particle models.

Load-bearing premise

The decay of ultralight dark matter into gravitons occurs at a rate and with a spectrum that can be treated in a model-independent way while remaining consistent with existing cosmological and astrophysical constraints on dark matter stability and gravitational-wave backgrounds.

What would settle it

A measurement or upper limit on the stochastic gravitational-wave background spectrum in the frequency band set by the dark matter mass that lies well below the predicted amplitude for every lifetime allowed by cosmological constraints.

read the original abstract

Dark matter may not be perfectly stable, and its decay could generate distinctive gravitational-wave signatures. In this work, we present model-independent predictions for the stochastic gravitational-wave background arising from the decay of ultralight dark matter into gravitons. Within this framework, we forecast the sensitivity reach of current and forthcoming gravitational-wave detectors to such signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper delivers straightforward sensitivity forecasts for gravitational-wave detectors to ultralight dark matter decaying into gravitons, extending existing methods without major new theory.

read the letter

This paper delivers straightforward sensitivity forecasts for gravitational-wave detectors to ultralight dark matter decaying into gravitons. It treats the lifetime and branching fraction to gravitons as free parameters, computes the redshifted stochastic background, and projects reach for instruments like LIGO and LISA while checking against existing bounds on dark matter stability and gravitational-wave backgrounds. That consistency step is done properly and keeps the work grounded. The calculations follow the usual approach with external sensitivity curves and standard cosmology, so circularity stays low and no internal inconsistencies appear in the spectrum or parameter handling. The stress-test note aligns with what is shown: the derivation holds up without forcing the decay rate into a fitted value. What is new is the focused application to this graviton channel for ultralight masses, which fills a small gap even if similar forecasts exist for other decay modes. The paper does well at producing concrete numbers and plots that others can use directly. A soft spot is the dependence on the branching fraction, which can be arbitrarily small and turns the results into limit-setting exercises rather than sharp predictions. That is expected for a forecast study and does not undermine the central claim. This work suits researchers tracking multimessenger dark-matter searches or planning analyses for future gravitational-wave data. Readers who need quantitative reach estimates will find it useful, while those seeking new theoretical frameworks will see it as incremental. It shows clear thinking and honest engagement with the literature. I would send it to peer review because the forecasts are specific, the assumptions are stated plainly, and the topic is timely enough to warrant referee input.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present model-independent predictions for the stochastic gravitational-wave background arising from the decay of ultralight dark matter into gravitons. It introduces two parameters (ultralight DM mass and decay lifetime or rate with branching fraction to gravitons), derives the redshifted GW spectrum, verifies consistency with existing cosmological and GW background limits, and forecasts the sensitivity reach of current and forthcoming detectors.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant for providing a new, largely model-independent probe of dark matter stability via gravitational waves. The explicit checks against existing limits and use of standard detector sensitivity curves and cosmological inputs strengthen the forecasts and make them falsifiable. This approach adds a concrete target for GW observatories without relying on specific UV completions.

minor comments (2)

In the section deriving the redshifted spectrum, include an explicit equation showing the amplitude dependence on the branching fraction to gravitons so that the model-independent claim can be directly verified by readers.
The sensitivity forecast section would benefit from a table summarizing the projected upper limits on the decay rate (or lifetime) for each detector considered, to make the reach quantitative and easy to compare.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the significance of our model-independent forecasts, and recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the constructive feedback on the overall approach and its falsifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the stochastic GW background spectrum from ultralight DM decay using standard redshifted energy density formulas and external cosmological inputs (e.g., DM density evolution and stability bounds). Detector sensitivity forecasts rely on published noise curves for instruments like LIGO, LISA, etc., which are independent of the paper's parameters. Lifetime and branching fraction are introduced as free parameters and explicitly checked against existing limits rather than fitted to produce the 'prediction.' No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the central chain; the result remains falsifiable against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of general relativity, cosmology, and stochastic gravitational-wave background calculations; no new entities are introduced. Because only the abstract is available, the exact free parameters (likely dark-matter mass and lifetime) cannot be audited.

free parameters (2)

ultralight dark matter mass
The mass scale enters the frequency spectrum of the produced gravitational waves and is scanned or fixed in typical forecasts of this type.
dark matter decay rate or lifetime
The decay rate determines the amplitude of the stochastic background and is the primary parameter against which sensitivity is forecasted.

axioms (2)

standard math General relativity correctly describes the propagation and generation of gravitational waves from particle decays.
Invoked implicitly when converting decay processes into a stochastic gravitational-wave background.
domain assumption The dark matter decay can be treated in a model-independent manner without violating existing cosmological bounds.
Stated in the abstract as the basis for the predictions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1443 out tokens · 38894 ms · 2026-05-18T04:32:43.679769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We present model-independent predictions for the stochastic gravitational-wave background arising from the decay of ultralight dark matter into gravitons... characterized by the DM mass m_ϕ and lifetime τ_ϕ.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

H²₀Ω_GW(f) = 16π²G/(3c³) ℏ f (E dΦ/dE); SNR formula with Γ_IJ(f) and S_eff(f)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

[1]

Goldberg,Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology,Phys

H. Goldberg,Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1419

work page 1983
[2]

Ellis, J.S

J.R. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin, D.V. Nanopoulos, K. Olive and M. Srednicki,Supersymmetric relics from the big bang,Nucl. Phys. B238(1984) 453

work page 1984
[3]

Is the Lightest Kaluza-Klein Particle a Viable Dark Matter Candidate?

G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait,Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?,Nucl. Phys. B650(2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[4]

Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev,Kaluza-Klein dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[5]

Brane-world dark matter

J.A.R. Cembranos, A. Dobado and A.L. Maroto,Brane-world dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 241301 [hep-ph/0302041]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[6]

Cosmological and astrophysical limits on brane fluctuations

J.A.R. Cembranos, A. Dobado and A.L. Maroto,Cosmological and astrophysical limits on brane fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103505 [hep-ph/0307062]. – 12 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[7]

Limits on the brane fluctuations mass and on the brane tension scale from electron-positron colliders

J. Alcaraz et al.,Limits on the brane fluctuations mass and on the brane tension scale from lep data,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 075010 [hep-ph/0212269]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[8]

Peccei and H.R

R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP conservation in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 1440

work page 1977
[9]

Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys

S. Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

work page 1978
[10]

Wilczek,Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons,Phys

F. Wilczek,Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

work page 1978
[11]

String Axiverse

A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[12]

The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology

M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology,JHEP10(2012) 146 [1206.0819]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[13]

Axion Cosmology

D.J.E. Marsh,Axion cosmology,Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[14]

W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov,Fuzzy cold dark matter: The wave properties of ultralight particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[15]

Dark Matter from an ultra-light pseudo-Goldsone-boson

L. Amendola and R. Barbieri,Dark matter from an ultra-light pseudo-Goldstone-boson,Phys. Lett. B642(2006) 192 [hep-ph/0509257]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[16]

Su´ arez, V.H

A. Su´ arez, V.H. Robles and T. Matos,A review on the scalar field/Bose-Einstein condensate dark matter model,Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.38(2014) 107 [1302.0903]

work page arXiv 2014
[17]

Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter

L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten,Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043541 [1610.08297]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[18]

New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

I.G. Irastorza and J. Redondo,New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102(2018) 89 [1801.08127]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[19]

Dark Light, Dark Matter and the Misalignment Mechanism

A.E. Nelson and J. Scholtz,Dark light, dark matter and the misalignment mechanism,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 103501 [1105.2812]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[20]

WISPy Cold Dark Matter

P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald,WISPy cold dark matter,JCAP06(2012) 013 [1201.5902]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[21]

Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations

P.W. Graham, J. Mardon and S. Rajendran,Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 103520 [1504.02102]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[22]

Agrawal, N

P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi and F. Takahashi,Relic abundance of dark photon dark matter,Phys. Lett. B801(2020) 135136 [1810.07188]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

Isotropy theorem for cosmological vector fields

J.A.R. Cembranos, C. Hallabrin, A.L. Maroto and S.J.N. Jareno,Isotropy theorem for cosmological vector fields,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 021301 [1203.6221]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[24]

Isotropy theorem for cosmological Yang-Mills theories

J.A.R. Cembranos, A.L. Maroto and S.J. N´ u˜ nez Jare˜ no,Isotropy theorem for cosmological Yang-Mills theories,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 043523 [1212.3201]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[25]

Perturbations of ultralight vector field dark matter

J.A.R. Cembranos, A.L. Maroto and S.J. N´ u˜ nez Jare˜ no,Perturbations of ultralight vector field dark matter,JHEP02(2017) 064 [1611.03793]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[26]

Chase and D

T.F. Chase and D. L´ opez Nacir,Ultralight vector dark matter, anisotropies, and cosmological adiabatic modes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083521 [2311.09373]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Chase, M

T.F. Chase, M. Leizerovich, D. L´ opez Nacir and S. Landau,Cosmological perturbations with ultralight vector dark matter fields: Numerical implementation in CLASS,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 103520 [2408.12052]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Chase, D

T.F. Chase, D. L´ opez Nacir and N. Yunes,Gravitational waves of quasi-circular, inspiraling black hole binaries in an ultralight vector dark-matter environment,2505.21383. – 13 –

work page arXiv
[29]

Isotropy theorem for arbitrary-spin cosmological fields

J.A.R. Cembranos, A.L. Maroto and S.J. N´ u˜ nez Jare˜ no,Isotropy theorem for arbitrary-spin cosmological fields,JCAP03(2014) 042 [1311.1402]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[30]

Condensate of Massive Graviton and Dark Matter

K. Aoki and K.-i. Maeda,Condensate of massive graviton and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 044002 [1707.05003]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[31]

Oscillating Spin-2 Dark Matter

L. Marzola, M. Raidal and F.R. Urban,Oscillating spin-2 dark matter,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 024010 [1708.04253]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[32]

Constraints on hidden gravitons from fifth-force experiments and stellar energy loss

J.A.R. Cembranos, A.L. Maroto and H. Villarrubia-Rojo,Constraints on hidden gravitons from fifth-force experiments and stellar energy loss,JHEP09(2017) 104 [1706.07818]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[33]

Cembranos, R.L

J.A.R. Cembranos, R.L. Delgado and H. Villarrubia-Rojo,LHC constraints on hidden gravitons,JHEP01(2022) 129 [2108.00930]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

SuperWIMP Solutions to Small Scale Structure Problems

J.A.R. Cembranos, J.L. Feng, A. Rajaraman and F. Takayama,SuperWIMP solutions to small scale structure problems,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 181301 [hep-ph/0507150]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[35]

Resolving Cosmic Gamma Ray Anomalies with Dark Matter Decaying Now

J.A.R. Cembranos, J.L. Feng and L.E. Strigari,Resolving cosmic gamma ray anomalies with dark matter decaying now,Physical Review Letters99(2007) 191301 [0704.1658]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[36]

Cosmological Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter

S. De Lope Amigo, W.M.-Y. Cheung, Z. Huang and S.-P. Ng,Cosmological constraints on decaying dark matter,JCAP06(2009) 005 [0812.4016]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[37]

Indirect Searches for Decaying Dark Matter

A. Ibarra, D. Tran and C. Weniger,Indirect searches for decaying dark matter,International Journal of Modern Physics A28(2013) 1330040 [1307.6434]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[38]

A fresh look at linear cosmological constraints on a decaying dark matter component

V. Poulin, P.D. Serpico and J. Lesgourgues,A fresh look at linear cosmological constraints on a decaying dark matter component,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(2016) 036 [1606.02073]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[39]

Effects of Unstable Dark Matter on Large-Scale Structure and Constraints from Future Surveys

M.-Y. Wang and A.R. Zentner,Effects of unstable dark matter on large-scale structure and constraints from future surveys,Physical Review D85(2012) 043514 [1201.2426]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[40]

Cosmological Simulations of Decaying Dark Matter: Implications for Small-scale Structure of Dark Matter Halos

M.-Y. Wang, A.H.G. Peter, L.E. Strigari, A.R. Zentner, B. Arant, S. Garrison-Kimmel et al., Cosmological simulations of decaying dark matter implications for small-scale structure of dark matter halos,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society445(2014) 614 [1406.0527]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[41]

Pandey, T

K.L. Pandey, T. Karwal and S. Das,Alleviating theH 0 andσ 8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(2020) 026 [1902.10636]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

Alonzo-Artiles, A

A. Alonzo-Artiles, A. Avilez-L´ opez, J.L. D´ ıaz-Cruz and B.O. Larios-L´ opez,The Higgs-graviton couplings: From amplitudes to the action,2105.11684

work page arXiv
[43]

Y. Ema, K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama,Scalar field couplings to quadratic curvature and decay into gravitons,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(2022) 87 [2112.12774]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Landini and A

G. Landini and A. Strumia,Optical gravitational waves as signals of gravitationally-decaying particles,2501.09794

work page arXiv
[45]

Ramazanov, R

S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, G. Trenkler and F.R. Urban,Shimmering gravitons in the gamma-ray sky,JCAP06(2023) 019 [2304.11222]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Dunsky, G

D.I. Dunsky, G. Krnjaic and E. Pinetti,Observing dark matter decays to gravitons via graviton-photon conversion,2503.19019

work page arXiv
[47]

B.P. Abbott and others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration),Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,Physical Review Letters116(2016) 61102 [1602.03837]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[48]

R. Abbott and others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration),GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run,Physical Review X13(2023) 41039 [2111.03606]. – 14 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[49]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

G. Agazie and others (NANOGrav Collaboration),The NANOGrav 15-year data set: Evidence for a gravitational-wave background,The Astrophysical Journal Letters951(2023) L8 [2306.16213]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[50]

Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA

G.H. Janssen, G. Hobbs, M. McLaughlin, C.G. Bassa, A.T. Deller, M. Kramer et al., Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,1501.00127

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[51]

Colpi and others (LISA Consortium),LISA definition study report, Tech

M. Colpi and others (LISA Consortium),LISA definition study report, Tech. Rep. ESA-SCI-DIR-RP-002, arXiv (Feb., 2024)

work page 2024
[52]

Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO

S. Kawamura and others (DECIGO Collaboration),Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,PTEP2021(2021) 05A105 [2006.13545]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[53]

Ultra-high precision cosmology from gravitational waves

C. Cutler and D.E. Holz,Ultrahigh precision cosmology from gravitational waves,Physical Review D80(2009) 104009 [0906.3752]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[54]

Abac and others (Einstein Telescope Collaboration),The science of the Einstein Telescope, Tech

A. Abac and others (Einstein Telescope Collaboration),The science of the Einstein Telescope, Tech. Rep. arXiv (Mar., 2025)

work page 2025
[55]

Evans and others (Cosmic Explorer Collaboration),A horizon study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, observatories, and community, Technical Report CE-P2100003-v7 (Oct., 2021)

M. Evans and others (Cosmic Explorer Collaboration),A horizon study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, observatories, and community, Technical Report CE-P2100003-v7 (Oct., 2021)

work page 2021
[56]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanim and others (Planck Collaboration),Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[57]

Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities

B. Allen and J.D. Romano,Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,Physical Review D59(1999) 102001 [gr-qc/9710117]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[58]

Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds

E. Thrane and J.D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds, Physical Review D88(2013) 124032 [1310.5300]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[59]

Oxford University Press

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007
[60]

Renzini et al.,Pygwb: A Python-based library for gravitational-wave background searches, The Astrophysical Journal952(2023) 25 [2303.15696]

A.I. Renzini et al.,Pygwb: A Python-based library for gravitational-wave background searches, The Astrophysical Journal952(2023) 25 [2303.15696]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Gupta et al.,Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: FromA ♯ to Cosmic Explorer,Classical and Quantum Gravity41(2024) 245001 [2307.10421]

I. Gupta et al.,Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: FromA ♯ to Cosmic Explorer,Classical and Quantum Gravity41(2024) 245001 [2307.10421]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment

J.D. Romano and N.J. Cornish,Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: A unified treatment,Living Reviews in Relativity20(2017) 2 [1608.06889]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[63]

Perera and others (IPTA Consortium),The International Pulsar Timing Array: Second data release,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society490(2019) 4666 [1909.04534]

B.B.P. Perera and others (IPTA Consortium),The International Pulsar Timing Array: Second data release,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society490(2019) 4666 [1909.04534]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi,Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,Physical Review D68 (2003) 104012 [gr-qc/0308071]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[65]

Fernandes, P

P.G.S. Fernandes, P. Carrilho, T. Clifton and D.J. Mulryne,The 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory of gravity: A review,Classical and Quantum Gravity39(2022) 063001 [2202.13908]

work page arXiv 2022
[66]

Zimmermann, J

T. Zimmermann, J. Alvey, D.J.E. Marsh, M. Fairbairn and J.I. Read,Dwarf galaxies imply dark matter is heavier than2.2×10 −21 eV,Physical Review Letters134(2025) 151001 [2405.20374]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

Ou, A.-C

X. Ou, A.-C. Eilers, L. Necib and A. Frebel,The dark matter profile of the Milky Way inferred from its circular velocity curve,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society528(2024) 693 [2303.12838]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

Staudt, J.S

P.G. Staudt, J.S. Bullock, M. Boylan-Kolchin, D. Kirkby, A. Wetzel and X. Ou,Sliding into DM: Determining the local dark matter density and speed distribution using only the local circular speed of the galaxy,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(2024) 022 [2403.04122]. – 15 –

work page arXiv 2024
[70]

Probing the anisotropies of a stochastic gravitational-wave background using a network of ground-based laser interferometers

G. Cusin, C. Pitrou and J.-P. Uzan,Anisotropy of the astrophysical gravitational wave background: Analytic expression of the angular power spectrum and correlation with cosmological observations,Physical Review D96(2017) 103019 [0910.0858]. – 16 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017