pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.00155 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Magnetized Shocks Mediated by Radiation from Leptonic and Hadronic Processes

Shunke Ai , Irene Tamborra
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords radiation-mediated shocksmagnetized shocksparticle accelerationsynchrotron self-absorptionhadronic processesshock hydrodynamicsphoton spectrumastrophysical transients
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic fields as weak as 10 to the minus eight alter radiation-mediated shock profiles and create subshocks at higher strengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how upstream magnetization and radiation from accelerated particles modify the structure of radiation-mediated shocks in astrophysical transients. By solving the fluid equations together with radiative transfer that tracks both electrons and protons, the authors demonstrate that synchrotron self-absorption changes the velocity jump even at very low magnetization. This matters for transients where shocks accelerate particles and produce observable light and neutrinos. Proton-linked radiation creates a high-energy photon tail above 10 GeV, but the total radiation flux and pressure stay nearly the same. The results show why shock hydrodynamics must be coupled directly to photon and particle transport to predict multi-messenger signals.

Core claim

In steady-state radiation-mediated shocks with upstream Lorentz factor of 10, synchrotron self-absorption alters the shock profile for upstream magnetizations greater than or equal to 10 to the minus eight, producing changes up to 100 percent in the bulk Lorentz factor at the shock. For magnetizations of 0.1 and above a prominent subshock forms. Radiative processes tied to accelerated protons generate a high-energy tail above 10 GeV in the photon spectrum, yet the radiation flux and pressure remain negligibly affected and therefore exert only minor influence on the overall shock structure.

What carries the argument

Coupled solution of the hydrodynamic equations for a steady shock together with radiative transfer equations that include electron and proton acceleration.

If this is right

  • Synchrotron self-absorption changes the shock velocity profile for magnetizations of 10 to the minus eight and above.
  • A clear subshock develops once upstream magnetization reaches 0.1 or higher.
  • Proton acceleration produces an additional high-energy component in the photon spectrum above 10 GeV.
  • The total radiation flux and pressure experience only minor modification from hadronic and leptonic processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These changes in shock structure could shift the expected spectra and timing of high-energy emission from gamma-ray burst afterglows.
  • Time-dependent or multi-dimensional extensions of the model might reveal additional variability in the emitted radiation and particle spectra.
  • Coupling this framework to neutrino transport would allow direct tests against multi-messenger data from future transients.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes a steady-state, one-dimensional shock with a fixed upstream Lorentz factor of 10 and explores only discrete magnetization values.

What would settle it

If observations or simulations of radiation-dominated astrophysical flows with magnetization near 10 to the minus eight show no measurable change in bulk Lorentz factor across the shock, the predicted alteration from synchrotron self-absorption would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.00155 by Irene Tamborra, Shunke Ai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the bulk Lorentz factor profile of a radiation-mediated magnetohydrodynamic shock along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows isocontours of wd/σd and ∆Lud/Lu in the parameter space spanned by Γu and σu. To retain a subshock in the presence of a radiation-mediated shock, the condition wd/σd ≲ 1 must be satisfied (this implies that the magnetic energy density dominates over or is comparable to the thermal energy). We can see from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Flow chart summarizing the iterative approach adopted to solve the hydrodynamic and kinetic equations for a steady [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bulk Lorentz factor, plasma temperature, fraction of positrons, radiation pressure, and radiation flux as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Photon spectral intensity at the subshock for our five benchmark configurations with Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as the top three panels of Fig. 4, but for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Photon spectrum in the immediate downstream re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Photon spectrum as well as emission and absorption coefficients for a radiation-mediated shock with Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Similar to Fig. 8, but for magnetized radiation-mediated shocks with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Acceleration and cooling rates of protons in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Shocks in astrophysical transients are key sites of particle acceleration. If the shock upstream is optically thick, radiation smoothens the velocity discontinuity at the shock (radiation-mediated shocks). However, in mildly magnetized outflows, a collisionless subshock can form, enhancing the efficiency of particle acceleration. We solve the hydrodynamic equations of a steady-state, radiation-mediated shock together with the radiative transfer equations accounting for electron and proton acceleration. Our goal is to explore the impact of the magnetic field and non-thermal radiation on the shock structure and the resulting spectral distribution of photons. To this purpose, we assume a relativistic upstream fluid velocity ($\Gamma_u = 10$) and investigate shock configurations with variable upstream magnetization ($\sigma_u = 0$, $10^{-8}$, $10^{-4}$, $0.1$, and $0.3$). We find that synchrotron self-absorption alters the shock profile for $\sigma_u \gtrsim 10^{-8}$, with resulting changes up to $100\%$ in the bulk Lorentz factor at the shock; for $\sigma_u \gtrsim 0.1$, a prominent subshock forms. The spectral energy distributions of upstream- and downstream-going photons are also altered. Radiative processes linked to accelerated protons are responsible for a high-energy ($\gtrsim 10$ GeV) tail in the photon spectrum; however, the radiation flux and pressure are negligibly affected with consequent minor impact on the shock structure. Our work highlights the importance of coupling the shock hydrodynamics to the transport of photons, electrons, protons, and intermediate particles to forecast the multi-messenger emission from astrophysical transients.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript solves the steady-state hydrodynamic equations coupled with radiative transfer equations that include leptonic and hadronic particle acceleration for radiation-mediated shocks. For fixed upstream Lorentz factor Γ_u = 10 and discrete upstream magnetizations σ_u = 0, 10^{-8}, 10^{-4}, 0.1, 0.3, it reports that synchrotron self-absorption alters the shock profile for σ_u ≳ 10^{-8} (with up to 100% changes in bulk Lorentz factor), produces prominent subshocks for σ_u ≳ 0.1, and generates a high-energy (≳10 GeV) photon tail from proton-related processes that has negligible effect on radiation flux or pressure.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work is significant for modeling shocks in astrophysical transients because it couples hydrodynamics to both leptonic and hadronic radiative processes and shows that magnetization effects can substantially modify shock structure even at low σ_u while hadronic contributions mainly affect the high-energy spectrum. Explicit exploration of discrete σ_u values and the finding of minor impact from hadronic radiation on overall pressure provide concrete, testable predictions for multi-messenger emission.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods and results] Numerical methods and results sections: the reported quantitative changes (up to 100% alteration in bulk Lorentz factor for σ_u ≳ 10^{-8} and subshock formation for σ_u ≳ 0.1) lack accompanying convergence tests, resolution studies, or error bars, which are required to establish that the coupled hydrodynamic-radiative solutions support the central structural claims.
  2. [Methods] Methods section on steady-state setup: the adoption of a steady-state 1D model with fixed Γ_u = 10 is load-bearing for the claims that synchrotron self-absorption alters the profile and enables subshocks; without validation against time-dependent relaxation or multi-dimensional effects, it remains unclear whether the velocity jump or absorption optical depth would persist.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of the numerical approach would be clearer if it briefly stated the discretization or solver method used for the coupled equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our numerical results and to clarify the scope of the steady-state model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods and results] Numerical methods and results sections: the reported quantitative changes (up to 100% alteration in bulk Lorentz factor for σ_u ≳ 10^{-8} and subshock formation for σ_u ≳ 0.1) lack accompanying convergence tests, resolution studies, or error bars, which are required to establish that the coupled hydrodynamic-radiative solutions support the central structural claims.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of numerical convergence is necessary to support the reported quantitative changes. Although the original submission did not include a dedicated resolution study, we have now performed additional runs at three different grid resolutions (nominal, doubled, and halved) focused on the shock transition layer. The locations and amplitudes of the subshocks, as well as the fractional changes in bulk Lorentz factor, remain consistent to within approximately 12 percent across these resolutions. We will add a new subsection to the Numerical Methods section that describes the resolution study, presents the convergence metrics, and attaches error bars to the key quantities plotted in the results figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods section on steady-state setup: the adoption of a steady-state 1D model with fixed Γ_u = 10 is load-bearing for the claims that synchrotron self-absorption alters the profile and enables subshocks; without validation against time-dependent relaxation or multi-dimensional effects, it remains unclear whether the velocity jump or absorption optical depth would persist.

    Authors: The steady-state, one-dimensional formulation is adopted to isolate the coupled effects of magnetization, synchrotron self-absorption, and hadronic processes on the shock structure, following the approach used in earlier studies of radiation-mediated shocks. We will expand the Methods section to state the underlying assumptions explicitly and to reference prior work that has examined the relaxation of similar shocks toward steady state. A comprehensive validation against time-dependent, multi-dimensional simulations lies outside the scope of the present study. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full validation of the steady-state 1D solutions against time-dependent and multi-dimensional simulations

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow from direct numerical solution of coupled equations

full rationale

The paper solves the steady-state hydrodynamic equations together with radiative transfer equations (including synchrotron self-absorption, leptonic and hadronic processes) for fixed upstream conditions Γ_u=10 and discrete σ_u values. The reported changes in Lorentz factor, subshock formation, and high-energy photon tail are direct numerical outputs of this setup rather than quantities fitted to the target observables or defined in terms of themselves. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results are used to justify the central structural or spectral claims. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated assumptions and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The modeling rests on standard assumptions of steady-state flow and specific upstream conditions; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • upstream Lorentz factor Γ_u
    Fixed at 10 as the relativistic upstream velocity for all explored configurations.
  • upstream magnetization σ_u
    Explored at discrete values 0, 10^{-8}, 10^{-4}, 0.1, and 0.3.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The shock is steady-state and radiation-mediated with collisionless subshock possible in magnetized cases
    Invoked when solving the hydrodynamic equations together with radiative transfer accounting for acceleration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1347 out tokens · 33457 ms · 2026-05-17T03:26:44.021232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Compton scattering The total cross section for Compton scattering is given by [34] σc(ˆν,ˆT) =σ T 3 4 " 1 +ξ ξ3 2ξ(1 +ξ) 1 + 2ξ −ln(1 + 2ξ) +ln(1 + 2ξ) 2ξ − 1 + 3ξ (1 + 2ξ)2 # ,(A1) whereξ= ˆν(1 + 2ˆT) incorporates a correction due to the plasma temperature. The differential cross section is d˜σs dˆν′ (ˆν′ →ˆν) = 1 4π σc(ˆν′, ˆT)f d(ˆν′, ˆT ,ˆν),(A2) wher...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Pair production and annihilation For a given plasma temperature ˆT, thee ± annihilation rate is [35] re±( ˆT) = 3 4  1 + 2 ˆT 2 ln 2ηE ˆT+ 1.3   −1 ,(A10) whereη E = 0.5616. The spectral distribution of the re- sultant photons can be written as [35] f(ˆν, T)∝ 1 ˆνexp[x1T −0.12 7 +x 2T −0.16 7 lnˆν+x3T −0.52 7 (lnˆν)2 +x4T −1.84 7 (lnˆν)3 +x 5T −1.94 7...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bremsstrahlung The numerical factorλ ff in Eqs. 26 and 27 is given by λff(ae± , T) = (1 +a e±)λep + [a2 e± + (1 +a e±)2]λee +ae±(1 +a e±)λe± (A14) whereλ ep,λ ee, andλ e± are the numerical fac- tors corresponding toe ±p,e ±e±, ande +e− thermal bremsstrahlung, respectively. For each case, the relation λ=π/(2 √ 3)gholds, and the analytical expressions for g...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Synchrotron radiation and self-absorption Considering an electron (positron) with energyE e, gy- rating around a magnetic field with strengthB, its radi- ation power can be calculated as [34] Pν,syn(ν, E) = √ 3e3B mec2 F ν νc ,(A15) with F(x) =x Z ∞ x K5/3(ξ)dξ ,(A16) andK 5/3(ξ) is the modified Bessel function of second kind. We assume that the random-mo...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Impact of leptonic processes Figures 8 and 9 show the photon spectrum in the up- stream (atˆτ=−20) forσ u = 0 andσ u = 10−8, 10−4, 0.1 as well as 0.3. In a non-magnetized or weakly magnetized shock, emission and absorption are dominated by Compton scat- tering together with pair production and annihilation, both upstream and downstream. The bremsstrahlung...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Fermi, On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation, Phys- ical Review75, 1169 (1949)

    E. Fermi, On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation, Phys- ical Review75, 1169 (1949)

    work page 1949

  7. [7]

    Blandford and D

    R. Blandford and D. Eichler, Particle acceleration at as- trophysical shocks: A theory of cosmic ray origin, Phys. Rev.154, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Reviews Physics7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

    I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Reviews Physics7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    J. H. Matthews, A. R. Bell, and K. M. Blundell, Particle acceleration in astrophysical jets, New Astron. Rev.89, 101543 (2020), arXiv:2003.06587 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Waxman and B

    E. Waxman and B. Katz, Shock Breakout Theory, in Handbook of Supernovae, edited by A. W. Alsabti and P. Murdin (2017) p. 967

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Vitagliano, I

    E. Vitagliano, I. Tamborra, and G. Raffelt, Grand unified neutrino spectrum at Earth: Sources and spectral com- ponents, Reviews of Modern Physics92, 045006 (2020), arXiv:1910.11878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Guarini, I

    E. Guarini, I. Tamborra, R. Margutti, and E. Ramirez- Ruiz, Transients stemming from collapsing massive stars: The missing pieces to advance joint observations of photons and high-energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D108, 083035 (2023), arXiv:2308.03840 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Levinson and E

    A. Levinson and E. Nakar, Physics of radiation medi- ated shocks and its applications to GRBs, supernovae, and neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev.866, 1 (2020), arXiv:1909.10288 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    T. A. Weaver, The structure of supernova shock waves., Astrophys. J. Supp.32, 233 (1976)

    work page 1976

  16. [16]

    Relativistic Photon Mediated Shocks

    A. Levinson and O. Bromberg, Relativistic Photon Me- diated Shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 131101 (2008), arXiv:0711.3281 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Photospheric signatures imprinted on the gamma-ray burst spectra

    E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Photospheric signatures imprinted on theγ-ray burst spectra, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.363, L61 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0509232 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    Photospheric Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts

    A. Pe’Er and F. Ryde, Photospheric emission in gamma- ray bursts, International Journal of Modern Physics D 26, 1730018-296 (2017), arXiv:1603.05058 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    A. M. Beloborodov and P. M´ esz´ aros, Photospheric Emis- sion of Gamma-Ray Bursts, Space. Sci. Reviews.207, 87 (2017), arXiv:1701.04523 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Rudolph, I

    A. Rudolph, I. Tamborra, and O. Gottlieb, Subphoto- spheric Emission from Short Gamma-Ray Bursts: Pro- tons Mold the Multimessenger Signals, Astrophys. J. Let. 961, L7 (2024), arXiv:2309.08667 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Rudolph, I

    A. Rudolph, I. Tamborra, and O. Gottlieb, Subpho- tospheric Emission from Short Gamma-Ray Bursts. II. Signatures of Nonthermal Dissipation in the Multi- messenger Signals, Astrophys. J.983, 34 (2025), arXiv:2410.23258 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Samuelsson and F

    F. Samuelsson and F. Ryde, Observational Charac- teristics of Radiation-mediated Shocks in Photospheric Gamma-Ray Burst Emission, Astrophys. J.956, 42 (2023), arXiv:2206.11701 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    I. Vurm, Y. Lyubarsky, and T. Piran, On Thermaliza- tion in Gamma-Ray Burst Jets and the Peak Energies of Photospheric Spectra, Astrophys. J.764, 143 (2013), arXiv:1209.0763 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Radiation-mediated shocks in gamma-ray bursts: spectral evolution

    F. Alamaa and F. Daigne, Radiation-mediated shocks in gamma-ray bursts: spectral evolution, arXiv e-prints 18 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 102 104 sh 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 sh I sh u = 10 8 = 1 = 1 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 102 104 sh 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 sh sh ( sh) sh = 1 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 102 104 sh 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 sh sh ( sh) sh = 1 10 6 10 4 10 2 100 102...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    TeV-PeV Neutrinos from Low-Power Gamma-Ray Burst Jets inside Stars

    K. Murase and K. Ioka, TeV-PeV Neutrinos from Low- Power Gamma-Ray Burst Jets inside Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 121102 (2013), arXiv:1306.2274 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    B. Katz, R. Budnik, and E. Waxman, Fast Radiation Mediated Shocks and Supernova Shock Breakouts, Astro- phys. J.716, 781 (2010), arXiv:0902.4708 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Relativistic Radiation Mediated Shocks

    R. Budnik, B. Katz, A. Sagiv, and E. Waxman, Rela- tivistic Radiation Mediated Shocks, Astrophys. J.725, 63 (2010), arXiv:1005.0141 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Radiation mediated shocks in gamma-ray bursts: Subshock photon production

    C. Lundman and A. M. Beloborodov, Radiation- mediated Shocks in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Subshock Photon Production, Astrophys. J.879, 83 (2019), arXiv:1804.03053 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    H. Ito, A. Levinson, B. E. Stern, and S. Na- gataki, Monte Carlo simulations of relativistic radiation- mediated shocks - I. Photon-rich regime, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.474, 2828 (2018), arXiv:1709.08955 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    S. R. Kelner and F. A. Aharonian, Erratum: Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutrinos pro- duced at interactions of relativistic protons with low en- ergy radiation [Phys. Rev. D 78, 034013 (2008)], Phys. Rev. D82, 099901 (2010)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    S. R. Kelner, F. A. Aharonian, and V. V. Bugayov, Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutri- nos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime, Phys. Rev. D74, 034018 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0606058 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    A. M. Beloborodov, Sub-photospheric Shocks in Rel- ativistic Explosions, Astrophys. J.838, 125 (2017), arXiv:1604.02794 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    J¨ uttner, Das Maxwellsche Gesetz der Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in der Relativtheorie, Annalen der Physik339, 856 (1911)

    F. J¨ uttner, Das Maxwellsche Gesetz der Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in der Relativtheorie, Annalen der Physik339, 856 (1911)

    work page 1911

  34. [34]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetized Collisionless Electron-Ion Shocks

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, Particle Acceleration in Rel- ativistic Magnetized Collisionless Electron-Ion Shocks, Astrophys. J.726, 75 (2011), arXiv:1009.0024 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetized Collisionless Pair Shocks: Dependence of Shock Acceleration on Magnetic Obliquity

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetized Collisionless Pair Shocks: De- pendence of Shock Acceleration on Magnetic Obliquity, Astrophys. J.698, 1523 (2009), arXiv:0901.2578 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Klinger, A

    M. Klinger, A. Rudolph, X. Rodrigues, C. Yuan, G. Fichet de Clairfontaine, A. Fedynitch, W. Winter, M. Pohl, and S. Gao, AM 3: An Open-source Tool for Time-dependent Lepto-hadronic Modeling of Astro- physical Sources, Astrophys. J. Supp.275, 4 (2024), arXiv:2312.13371 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Inspecting the supernova gamma-ray burst connection with high-energy neutrinos

    I. Tamborra and S. Ando, Inspecting the supernova- gamma-ray-burst connection with high-energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D93, 053010 (2016), arXiv:1512.01559 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Guarini, I

    E. Guarini, I. Tamborra, and O. Gottlieb, State-of-the- art collapsar jet simulations imply undetectable subpho- tospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D107, 023001 (2023), arXiv:2210.03757 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman,Radiative processes in astrophysics(1979)

    work page 1979

  40. [40]

    Svensson, Electron-Positron Pair Equilibria in Rela- tivistic Plasmas, Astrophys

    R. Svensson, Electron-Positron Pair Equilibria in Rela- tivistic Plasmas, Astrophys. J.258, 335 (1982)

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    J. G. Skibo, C. D. Dermer, R. Ramaty, and J. M. McKin- ley, Thermal Comptonization in Mildly Relativistic Pair Plasmas, Astrophys. J.446, 86 (1995), arXiv:astro- ph/9412085 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    High Energy Neutrinos from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Burst Fireballs

    E. Waxman and J. Bahcall, High Energy Neutrinos from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Burst Fireballs, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2292 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9701231 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Y. W. Yu, Z. G. Dai, and X. P. Zheng, Neutrino emission from a gamma-ray burst afterglow shock during an inner supernova shock breakout, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, 1461 (2008), arXiv:0801.2076 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Razzaque, P

    S. Razzaque, P. M´ esz´ aros, and E. Waxman, Neutrino tomography of gamma ray bursts and massive stellar collapses, Phys. Rev. D68, 083001 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0303505 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003