pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02101 · v2 · pith:ZBPXP3G4new · submitted 2025-12-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Do neutrinos dream in 5D? Towards a comprehensive extra-dimensional neutrino phenomenology

Arturo de Giorgi , Dhruv Pasari , Jessica Turner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords neutrino massesextra dimensionsKaluza-Klein modesneutrino oscillationsMajorana neutrinosDirac neutrinosphenomenologycompactification
0
0 comments X

The pith

A five-dimensional bulk fermion in flat extra dimensions produces a Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos whose mass spectra and mixings depend on four distinct Dirac or Majorana scenarios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a bulk fermion in a five-dimensional space compactified on an orbifold appears in our four-dimensional world as a tower of right-handed neutrinos with increasing masses. It works through four concrete ways to introduce Dirac or Majorana mass terms, placing them either throughout the extra dimension or on our three-brane. For each choice the authors calculate the resulting neutrino masses, mixing angles, and oscillation probabilities both in vacuum and in matter. These predictions are compared with existing neutrino data to derive limits on the size and other properties of the extra dimension. A reader would care because the setup offers a geometric origin for the small neutrino masses without new four-dimensional fields.

Core claim

In a flat extra dimension compactified on an S1/Z2 orbifold, a 5D bulk fermion manifests as a Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos in the 4D effective theory. Four distinct scenarios for mass generation, considering both Dirac and Majorana mass terms originating from either the bulk or the 3-brane, lead to specific mass spectra and mixing patterns that can be constrained by neutrino oscillation data.

What carries the argument

The Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos obtained from a single 5D bulk fermion on an S1/Z2 orbifold, which sets the structure of the effective four-dimensional mass matrices according to whether the mass terms sit in the bulk or on the brane.

If this is right

  • Each of the four scenarios produces a distinct pattern of neutrino masses and mixings that can be tested against current oscillation measurements.
  • Matter effects on neutrino propagation differ across the scenarios and provide additional experimental handles.
  • The radius of the extra dimension is bounded by the requirement that the predicted spectra remain consistent with observed neutrino masses and mixings.
  • The same mass matrices also determine the rates of rare processes such as neutrinoless double-beta decay in the Majorana cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same extra-dimensional setup could be applied to other fermions to generate hierarchical masses for quarks and charged leptons.
  • Cosmological observables such as the sum of neutrino masses or the effective number of relativistic species could further constrain the Kaluza-Klein spectrum.
  • Precision measurements at future long-baseline experiments could distinguish the bulk versus brane origin of the mass terms.

Load-bearing premise

The extra dimension is flat and compactified on an S1/Z2 orbifold, which fixes the structure of the Kaluza-Klein tower and the form of the effective 4D neutrino mass matrices.

What would settle it

Neutrino oscillation data that cannot be reproduced by any of the four mass-generation scenarios for any value of the compactification radius would rule out the framework.

read the original abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of neutrino masses and mixing in Large Extra Dimension scenarios, focusing on the phenomenological impact of a five-dimensional (5D) bulk fermion. In a flat extra dimension compactified on an $S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold, this fermion manifests as a Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos in the 4D effective theory. We systematically investigate four distinct scenarios for mass generation, considering both Dirac and Majorana mass terms originating from either the bulk or the 3-brane. For each case, we analyse the consequences for neutrino oscillations in a vacuum and in matter, deriving the resulting mass spectra and mixing patterns. By comparing these theoretical predictions with experimental data, we explore the constraints on the large extra dimensions' parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of neutrino masses and mixing in large extra dimension scenarios. It focuses on a 5D bulk fermion compactified on an S¹/Z₂ orbifold, which manifests as a Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos in the 4D effective theory. Four distinct scenarios for Dirac or Majorana mass terms (from bulk or brane) are analyzed, with derivations of mass spectra and mixing patterns for neutrino oscillations in vacuum and matter, followed by comparisons to experimental data to constrain extra-dimensional parameters such as the compactification radius.

Significance. If the results hold, this work offers a systematic compilation of standard phenomenological implications for extra-dimensional neutrino models, serving as a useful reference for how bulk/brane mass terms lead to distinct spectra and mixing that can be tested against oscillation data. It strengthens the case for using neutrino experiments to probe large extra dimensions by covering both vacuum and matter effects across the scenarios.

major comments (1)
  1. [scenarios for mass generation] The effective 4D mass matrices and resulting spectra for the four scenarios are presented following the orbifold reduction, but the explicit steps from the 5D Lagrangian, parity assignments, and boundary conditions are not detailed; this is load-bearing for independently verifying the claimed distinct mass spectra and mixing patterns (abstract and scenarios section).
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the Kaluza-Klein modes and effective mixing parameters could be defined more explicitly at first use to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the standard reduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive overall assessment, which recommends minor revision. The work aims to compile phenomenological results for neutrino oscillations in 5D large extra dimensions across four mass-generation scenarios. We address the single major comment below by clarifying the derivation steps.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The effective 4D mass matrices and resulting spectra for the four scenarios are presented following the orbifold reduction, but the explicit steps from the 5D Lagrangian, parity assignments, and boundary conditions are not detailed; this is load-bearing for independently verifying the claimed distinct mass spectra and mixing patterns (abstract and scenarios section).

    Authors: We agree that the explicit derivation from the 5D Lagrangian strengthens the presentation and facilitates independent verification of the four distinct spectra. Although the manuscript assumes standard knowledge of orbifold compactifications, we have added a new subsection (now Section 2.2) that starts from the 5D bulk fermion Lagrangian, specifies the Z2 orbifold parity assignments for the left- and right-handed components, derives the boundary conditions on the S1/Z2 interval, performs the Kaluza-Klein mode expansion, and shows how these lead to the effective 4D mass matrices for each of the four cases (bulk Dirac, brane-localized Dirac, bulk Majorana, and brane-localized Majorana). The added material does not change any numerical results or conclusions but makes the logical chain fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard KK reduction and external data

full rationale

The paper is an overview of four standard scenarios for 5D bulk fermion neutrino masses reduced on flat S1/Z2. The KK tower structure, effective 4D mass matrices, and oscillation phenomenology follow from established orbifold parity assignments and bulk/brane localization choices in the literature. Mass spectra and mixing patterns are derived via standard techniques and then compared directly to external experimental neutrino oscillation data for constraints. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain defined inside the work; the central claims remain independent of internal redefinitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of extra-dimensional model building and on the choice of compactification; no new entities with independent evidence are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • compactification radius
    Size of the extra dimension appears as a free parameter whose value is constrained by fitting to oscillation data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The extra dimension is flat and compactified on an S1/Z2 orbifold.
    This choice determines the Kaluza-Klein mode structure and boundary conditions for the 5D fermion.
invented entities (1)
  • 5D bulk fermion no independent evidence
    purpose: Generates the Kaluza-Klein tower of right-handed neutrinos in the effective 4D theory.
    Postulated within the extra-dimensional framework; no independent falsifiable evidence outside the model is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5662 in / 1354 out tokens · 68422 ms · 2026-05-21T17:40:29.573212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dark Dimension Right-handed Neutrinos Confronted with Long-Baseline Oscillation Experiments

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Dark dimension right-handed neutrino models are confronted with T2K and NOvA long-baseline oscillation data, yielding exclusion limits on model parameters while remaining compatible with standard three-neutrino oscillations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421–428

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C790927(1979) 315–321, [arXiv:1306.4669]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  3. [3]

    Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979) 95–99

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 165

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    On the Unification Problem in Physics

    T. Kaluza,Zum Unit¨ atsproblem der Physik, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1921(1921) 966–972, [arXiv:1803.08616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1921

  6. [6]

    Klein,Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity

    O. Klein,Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity. (In German and English), Z. Phys.37(1926) 895–906

    work page 1926

  7. [7]

    The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali,The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 263–272, [hep-ph/9803315]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    An Alternative to Compactification

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    Hierarchies without Symmetries from Extra Dimensions

    N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz,Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 033005, [hep-ph/9903417]. – 45 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    D. E. Kaplan and T. M. P. Tait,New tools for fermion masses from extra dimensions, JHEP 11(2001) 051, [hep-ph/0110126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  12. [12]

    Bounds on Universal Extra Dimensions

    T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu,Bounds on universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 035002, [hep-ph/0012100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [13]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta,Neutrino oscillations without neutrino masses or heavy mass scales: A Higher dimensional seesaw mechanism, Nucl. Phys. B557(1999) 25, [hep-ph/9811428]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    Neutrino Masses from Large Extra Dimensions

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. R. Dvali, and J. March-Russell,Neutrino masses from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D65(2001) 024032, [hep-ph/9811448]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    G. R. Dvali and A. Y. Smirnov,Probing large extra dimensions with neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 563(1999) 63–81, [hep-ph/9904211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Neutrino Masses and Mixing in Brane-World Theories

    A. Lukas, P. Ramond, A. Romanino, and G. G. Ross,Neutrino Masses and Mixing in Brane World Theories, JHEP04(2001) 010, [hep-ph/0011295]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Neutrino masses and mixings in non-factorizable geometry

    Y. Grossman and M. Neubert,Neutrino masses and mixings in nonfactorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B474(2000) 361–371, [hep-ph/9912408]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    S. J. Huber and Q. Shafi,Seesaw mechanism in warped geometry, Phys. Lett. B583(2004) 293–303, [hep-ph/0309252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    C. S. Fong, R. N. Mohapatra, and I. Sung,Majorana Neutrinos from Inverse Seesaw in Warped Extra Dimension, Phys. Lett. B704(2011) 171–178, [arXiv:1107.4086]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    T. G. Ela¸ cmaz, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez,Updated Constraints on Large Extra Dimensions from Reactor Antineutrino Experiments,arXiv:2510.12900

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Bulk Standard Model in the Randall-Sundrum Background

    S. Chang, J. Hisano, H. Nakano, N. Okada, and M. Yamaguchi,Bulk standard model in the Randall-Sundrum background, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 084025, [hep-ph/9912498]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  22. [22]

    TASI 2011: Four Lectures on TeV Scale Extra Dimensions

    E. Ponton,TASI 2011: Four Lectures on TeV Scale Extra Dimensions, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: The Dark Secrets of the Terascale, pp. 283–374, 2013.arXiv:1207.3827

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    de Giorgi and S

    A. de Giorgi and S. Vogl,Dark matter interacting via a massive spin-2 mediator in warped extra-dimensions, JHEP11(2021) 036, [arXiv:2105.06794]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    J. K. Hoskins, R. D. Newman, R. Spero, and J. Schultz,Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse square law for mass separations from 2-cm to 105-cm, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 3084–3095

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    New Developments in the Casimir Effect

    M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko,New developments in the Casimir effect, Phys. Rept.353(2001) 1–205, [quant-ph/0106045]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    V. M. Mostepanenko and M. Novello,Constraints on nonNewtonian gravity from the Casimir force measurements between two crossed cylinders, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 115003, [hep-ph/0101306]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    New Experimental Constraints on Non-Newtonian Forces below 100 microns

    J. Chiaverini, S. J. Smullin, A. A. Geraci, D. M. Weld, and A. Kapitulnik,New experimental constraints on nonNewtonian forces below 100 microns, Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 151101, [hep-ph/0209325]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  28. [28]

    J. C. Long, H. W. Chan, A. B. Churnside, E. A. Gulbis, M. C. M. Varney, and J. C. Price, Upper limits to submillimeter-range forces from extra space-time dimensions, Nature421 (2003) 922–925, [hep-ph/0210004]. – 46 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  29. [29]

    Y. J. Chen, W. K. Tham, D. E. Krause, D. Lopez, E. Fischbach, and R. S. Decca,Stronger Limits on Hypothetical Yukawa Interactions in the 30–8000 nm Range, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016), no. 22 221102, [arXiv:1410.7267]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Tan, S.-Q

    W.-H. Tan, S.-Q. Yang, C.-G. Shao, J. Li, A.-B. Du, B.-F. Zhan, Q.-L. Wang, P.-S. Luo, L.-C. Tu, and J. Luo,New Test of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range with Dual Modulation and Compensation, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 13 131101

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer, and B. R. Heckel,New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 10 101101, [arXiv:2002.11761]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Minimal Flavour Violation: an effective field theory approach

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia,Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B645(2002) 155–187, [hep-ph/0207036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Dvali, M

    G. Dvali, M. Ettengruber, and A. Stuhlfauth,Kaluza-Klein spectroscopy from neutron oscillations into hidden dimensions, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 5 055046, [arXiv:2312.13278]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Giunti and C

    C. Giunti and C. W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics. 2007

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    P. A. N. Machado, H. Nunokawa, and R. Zukanovich Funchal,Testing for Large Extra Dimensions with Neutrino Oscillations, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 013003, [arXiv:1101.0003]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nandi, and A. Perez-Lorenzana,Neutrino masses and oscillations in models with large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B466(1999) 115–121, [hep-ph/9907520]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  37. [37]

    G. C. McLaughlin and J. N. Ng,Astrophysical implications of the induced neutrino magnetic moment from large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B470(1999) 157–162, [hep-ph/9909558]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  38. [38]

    Neutrino oscillations and large extra dimensions

    R. Barbieri, P. Creminelli, and A. Strumia,Neutrino oscillations from large extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B585(2000) 28–44, [hep-ph/0002199]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  39. [39]

    G. C. McLaughlin and J. N. Ng,The Use of nuclear beta decay as a test of bulk neutrinos in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 053002, [nucl-th/0003023]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  40. [40]

    R. N. Mohapatra and A. Perez-Lorenzana,Three flavor neutrino oscillations in models with large extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B593(2001) 451–470, [hep-ph/0006278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    Phenomenological implications of neutrinos in extra dimensions

    A. De Gouvea, G. F. Giudice, A. Strumia, and K. Tobe,Phenomenological implications of neutrinos in extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B623(2002) 395–420, [hep-ph/0107156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  42. [42]

    Constraints on Large Extra Dimensions from Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

    H. Davoudiasl, P. Langacker, and M. Perelstein,Constraints on large extra dimensions from neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 105015, [hep-ph/0201128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  43. [43]

    Q.-H. Cao, S. Gopalakrishna, and C. P. Yuan,Constraints on large extra dimensions with bulk neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 115003, [hep-ph/0312339]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    Probing Large Extra Dimensions With IceCube

    A. Esmaili, O. L. G. Peres, and Z. Tabrizi,Probing Large Extra Dimensions With IceCube, JCAP12(2014) 002, [arXiv:1409.3502]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Signatures of Extra Dimensional Sterile Neutrinos

    W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang,Signatures of Extra Dimensional Sterile Neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B737(2014) 81–89, [arXiv:1407.2739]. [48]MINOSCollaboration, P. Adamsonet. al.,Constraints on Large Extra Dimensions from the MINOS Experiment, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 11 111101, [arXiv:1608.06964]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    J. M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, K. J. Kelly, O. L. G. Peres, and Z. Tabrizi,Large, Extra Dimensions at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 3 033006, [arXiv:1603.00018]. – 47 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    G. V. Stenico, D. V. Forero, and O. L. G. Peres,A Short Travel for Neutrinos in Large Extra Dimensions, JHEP11(2018) 155, [arXiv:1808.05450]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    V. S. Basto-Gonzalez, D. V. Forero, C. Giunti, A. A. Quiroga, and C. A. Ternes, Short-baseline oscillation scenarios at JUNO and TAO, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 7 075023, [arXiv:2112.00379]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    D. V. Forero, C. Giunti, C. A. Ternes, and O. Tyagi,Large extra dimensions and neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 3 035027, [arXiv:2207.02790]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Siyeon, S

    K. Siyeon, S. Kim, M. Masud, and J. Park,Probing large extra dimension at DUNE using beam tunes, JHEP11(2024) 141, [arXiv:2409.08620]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Panda, P

    P. Panda, P. Mishra, S. Roy, M. Ghosh, and R. Mohanta,Study of Large Extra Dimension and neutrino decay at P2SO experiment, JHEP05(2025) 018, [arXiv:2411.09628]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Franklin, R

    J. Franklin, R. Kamath, D. Pasari, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, J. Turner, and M. A. Vogiatzi, nuSTORM as a Precision Probe of the Standard Model and New Physics,arXiv:2509.08882

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    R. N. Mohapatra and A. Perez-Lorenzana,Sterile neutrino as a bulk neutrino, Nucl. Phys. B 576(2000) 466–478, [hep-ph/9910474]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  54. [54]

    de Giorgi and M

    A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos,Extra-dimensional axion patterns, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 7 075006, [arXiv:2412.00179]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP12 (2024) 216, [arXiv:2410.05380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Cumulative Non-Decoupling Effects of Kaluza-Klein Neutrinos in Electroweak Processes

    A. Ioannisian and A. Pilaftsis,Cumulative nondecoupling effects of Kaluza-Klein neutrinos in electroweak processes, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 066001, [hep-ph/9907522]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    Solar neutrino oscillation from large extra dimensions

    A. Lukas, P. Ramond, A. Romanino, and G. G. Ross,Solar neutrino oscillation from large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B495(2000) 136–146, [hep-ph/0008049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  58. [58]

    Neutrinos in Large Extra Dimensions and Short-Baseline $\nu_e$ Appearance

    M. Carena, Y.-Y. Li, C. S. Machado, P. A. N. Machado, and C. E. M. Wagner,Neutrinos in Large Extra Dimensions and Short-Baselineν e Appearance, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 9 095014, [arXiv:1708.09548]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Searching for a Dark Dimension Right-handed Neutrino in KATRIN

    I. Antoniadis, A. Chatrabhuti, and H. Isono,Searching for a Dark Dimension Right-handed Neutrino in KATRIN,arXiv:2509.05233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Eller, M

    P. Eller, M. Ettengruber, and A. Zander,Neutrino data analysis of extra-dimensional theories with massive bulk fields, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 5 055009, [arXiv:2508.04274]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Leptogenesis in Theories with Large Extra Dimensions

    A. Pilaftsis,Leptogenesis in theories with large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 105023, [hep-ph/9906265]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  62. [62]

    Signatures from an extra-dimensional seesaw model

    M. Blennow, H. Melbeus, T. Ohlsson, and H. Zhang,Signatures from an extra-dimensional seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 045023, [arXiv:1003.0669]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Garbrecht and R

    B. Garbrecht and R. G. Landim,Fat brane and seesaw mechanism in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 9 095004, [arXiv:2005.10593]. [67]KA TRINCollaboration, M. Akeret. al.,Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Science388(2025), no. 6743 adq9592, [arXiv:2406.13516]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Di Valentino, S

    E. Di Valentino, S. Gariazzo, and O. Mena,Neutrinos in Cosmology,arXiv:2404.19322. – 48 – [69]DESICollaboration, M. Abdul Karimet. al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 8 083515, [arXiv:2503.14738]. [70]MINOS+Collaboration, P. Adamsonet. al.,Search for sterile neutri...

    work page arXiv 2025