Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 10 cited by

A Monte Carlo method computes anyon dispersion in fractional quantum anomalous Hall bands from the projected interaction, yielding a quasihole bandwidth of about 1 meV in twisted MoTe2.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 15:43 UTC pith:TWIHZQQP

load-bearing objection Strong new method for anyon dispersion in ideal AC bands; the quantitative MoTe2 prediction is shakier than the abstract suggests because a scalar moiré potential is dropped without error estimate. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.15863 v2 pith:TWIHZQQP submitted 2025-12-17 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Anyon Dispersion in Aharonov-Casher Bands and Implications for Twisted MoTe{}₂

Zihan Yan , Qingchen Li , Tomohiro Soejima , Eslam Khalaf This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords anyon dispersionfractional quantum anomalous HallAharonov-Casher bandsLaughlin quasiholetwisted MoTe2Monte Carloquantum geometryguiding center
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that anyons in fractional quantum anomalous Hall (FQAH) states can have a finite, computable dispersion, in contrast to conventional fractional quantum Hall anyons which are dispersionless. It does so by projecting the interaction onto the space of Laughlin quasiholes in an ideal (Aharonov-Casher) band, constructing quasihole momentum eigenstates, and evaluating the single-quasihole energy by Monte Carlo. Applying the method to twisted MoTe2 with realistic parameters, it finds a quasihole bandwidth of order 1 meV, growing with quantum-geometry inhomogeneity and screening length. A path-integral formulation traces this dispersion to the combination of an interaction-generated periodic potential from non-uniform quantum geometry and the quasihole's many-body Berry phase, which makes the guiding-center coordinate noncommutative. If correct, the result implies that quasiholes in clean FQAH samples are light enough to become itinerant, enabling phases such as re-entrant integer quantum Hall states or anyon superconductivity.

Core claim

The central claim is that in an ideal (Aharonov-Casher) band, the single-quasihole dispersion of a Laughlin state is given exactly, within the zero-mode subspace of the Trugman-Kivelson pseudopotential (a short-range interaction whose zero modes are Laughlin states), by ϵ_κ = ⟨ψ_κ|V|ψ_κ⟩, where |ψ_κ⟩ are explicitly constructed magnetic-translation momentum eigenstates of the quasihole. This expression is evaluated efficiently by Monte Carlo for systems up to N_Φ = 169. For twisted MoTe2 at ν=2/3, the resulting quasihole bandwidth is 1.1±0.3 meV near θ≈3.7°, and it increases with displacement field. The paper further derives the dispersion from a coherent-state path integral: the quasihole mo

What carries the argument

The central object is the Aharonov-Casher (AC) band, a Landau level in a periodic non-uniform magnetic field, which models the nearly ideal flat band of twisted MoTe2. The load-bearing construction is the set of quasihole momentum eigenstates |ψ_κ⟩, built by acting with magnetic-translation projectors on Laughlin quasihole coherent states; the dispersion is then the diagonal matrix element of the interaction in this basis, evaluated by Metropolis Monte Carlo. The complementary analytic machinery is the coherent-state path integral for a quasihole guiding-center coordinate ξ with commutator [ξ, ξ†] = 2q l_B^2, which shows that the projected interaction acts as a periodic potential whose Fouri

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative MoTe2 result assumes the valence flat band is accurately described by an ideal (Aharonov-Casher) band and that the scalar moiré potential U(r) can be neglected when computing quasihole wavefunctions and energies; if real-band deviations or U(r) contribute a comparable single-particle periodic potential, the predicted ~1 meV bandwidth is not guaranteed.

What would settle it

Compute the single-quasihole dispersion for the full continuum model of twisted MoTe2 including the scalar potential U(r) (or using an exact-diagonalization treatment on larger systems that keeps the realistic band geometry). If the bandwidth changes by more than the quoted 1.1±0.3 meV uncertainty, or if including U(r) washes out or shifts the dispersion by a comparable amount, the paper's central quantitative claim for MoTe2 fails. A complementary experiment: measure the doping threshold for the FQAH-to-RIQAH transition in clean MoTe2 and compare the implied quasihole mass with the computed b

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Quasiholes in FQAH states in AC/ideal bands have a finite effective mass; conventional FQH anyons are infinitely massive and localized by any disorder.
  • The quasihole bandwidth grows with increasing Berry-curvature (quantum-geometry) inhomogeneity and with increasing interaction screening length; it vanishes as d^4 for short screening.
  • For realistic twisted MoTe2 parameters, the bandwidth is ~1 meV, meaning that above a small anyon doping ν_QH ≳ m_QH/τ_QH the system crosses from disorder-dominated FQAH plateaus to itinerant-anyon physics (RIQAH or anyon superconductor), with a critical disorder time τ_QH,c ≈ 10 ps extracted from a reported transition at doping ~0.02.
  • The projected quasihole Hamiltonian can be derived from a microscopic multi-anyon Lagrangian retaining only anyon degrees of freedom, enabling future studies of quasihole binding and collective phases beyond exact diagonalization sizes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the paper drops the scalar moiré potential U(r) when mapping the continuum model to an AC band; if U(r) contributes a periodic potential comparable to the interaction-generated one, the 1 meV number could shift by an uncontrolled amount. A direct test is to include U(r) in the projected quasihole Hamiltonian and repeat the Monte Carlo.
  • Editorial extension: the same mechanism — periodic potential plus noncommutative guiding center — should apply to quasielectrons and to other FQAH platforms such as pentalayer graphene, though the paper only computes quasiholes in MoTe2.
  • Editorial extension: because the dispersion is set by the interplay of geometry inhomogeneity and screening length, tuning the gate distance (screening) in a MoTe2 device should change the quasihole bandwidth by a measurable factor; this is a tunable experimental knob that the paper does not explicitly propose.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytically controlled method to compute the single-quasihole dispersion in ideal Aharonov-Casher (AC) bands. It constructs Laughlin quasihole momentum eigenstates on the torus, evaluates the projected interaction energy by Monte Carlo for system sizes up to N_e~60, and derives the same dispersion from a coherent-state path integral involving a quasihole guiding center with noncommutative coordinates. The authors identify the physical mechanism as the combination of an interaction-generated periodic potential (from non-uniform single-particle quantum geometry) and the many-body Berry phase of the quasihole. They apply the method to twisted MoTe2 continuum parameters and report a quasihole bandwidth of order 1 meV (1.1±0.3 meV at θ≈3.7°), with implications for itinerant anyons in clean FQAH samples.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper is a significant methodological advance: it provides a scalable, non-ED route to anyon dispersion in ideal flat bands, with explicit momentum-space quasihole wavefunctions, a transparent effective guiding-center picture, and no fitted parameters for the dispersion. The Monte Carlo benchmarks (guiding-center structure factor, Coulomb energy) agree with known results, and the consistency with existing ED studies for tMoTe2 is encouraging. The physical picture—periodic potential plus noncommutative guiding-center coordinate—is clear and likely useful beyond the specific model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.B, Eqs. (46)-(47), Fig. 1(d)] The quantitative tMoTe2 result is computed from the AC Hamiltonian alone: the Monte Carlo evaluates Eq. (35) using the AC Kähler potential Q(r), but the continuum model is mapped to H_cont = H_AC + U(r) with U(r)=Δ+(r)-ω_cχ(r). U(r) is never included in the MC, and no estimate of its projected matrix elements is given. Since U(r) is moiré-periodic and the quasihole size is l_B~a_M, the paper's own Sec. II mechanism implies U(r) contributes to the dispersion. With amplitude comparable to the AC terms (tens of meV), the 1.1±0.3 meV bandwidth is not yet a prediction of the full continuum model. The authors should either compute ⟨ψκ|U|ψκ⟩, show that U(r) cancels or is suppressed in the quasihole sector, or explicitly restate the result as a property of the AC-band approximation.
  2. [Fig. 1(d) caption and Sec. IV.B] The twist-angle dependence is described as obtained from a single MC dataset with θ setting the length/energy scale, yet the text explains the non-monotonic minimum near θ≈3.5°–4° by the near cancellation of Δ+(r) and ω_cχ(r). Those terms appear in U(r), not in H_AC, so the stated cancellation cannot affect a calculation that omits U(r). Either U(r) is implicitly included (contradicting Eqs. (46)-(47)), or the quoted explanation is not supported. Please clarify the scaling procedure and reconcile this inconsistency.
  3. [Sec. IV.B and Sec. VI] For the realistic screened-Coulomb interaction, the Laughlin zero-mode quasihole states are used variationally, but the projection error is not quantified. The argument that the bandwidth is a small fraction of V1 does not by itself establish that the true low-energy quasihole branch has large overlap with the zero-mode subspace, because V1 is not the many-body gap and the dispersion is precisely the small O(1) quantity of interest. The agreement with ED [48,49] is reassuring and should be stated in the text as supporting evidence; a quantitative measure of the projection error (e.g., overlap or a matched-size ED comparison) would make the realistic-interaction claim load-bearing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III.A] Duplicated word: 'This motivates us to define define α_1'.
  2. [FIG. 1 caption] 'the q2 = 9 fold degeneracy' should read 'the q^2 = 9-fold degeneracy'.
  3. [Sec. IV.B footnote] Typo: 'bandwith' should be 'bandwidth'.
  4. [Sec. V.A around Eq. (63)] The notation κ=κ_0+∧ξ/q is compact and easy to misread; a brief explanation that this is a vector relation in the reduced Brillouin zone would improve readability.
  5. [FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 axis labels] Labels such as 'χφaM', 'χx', 'χy' are unclear; please use consistent notation for the moiré unit-cell coordinates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the dispersion is computed directly from the projected interaction, and the path-integral derivation is a mathematical identity that reproduces the same formula.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any prediction to its inputs by construction. The central dispersion formula, Eq. (35), is the direct Monte Carlo evaluation of ϵ_κ = ⟨ψ_κ|V|ψ_κ⟩, where |ψ_κ⟩ are explicitly constructed momentum eigenstates of the Trugman-Kivelson zero-mode space; no parameter is fitted to the dispersion. The coherent-state path-integral treatment in Sec. V is transparently a reformulation: it starts from the same matrix element written as O_ξ = ⟨ψ_ξ|O|ψ_ξ⟩ and, via Eqs. (59)-(63), shows that the resulting eigenvalue λ_κ equals ⟨ψ_κ|O|ψ_κ⟩. Thus the Lagrangian framework is a consistency check rather than an independent prediction. The tMoTe2 application uses literature parameters (ω,V,ψ) and the AC mapping from prior published work; the self-citations [23] and [58] are background, and [58] is explicitly said to be a parallel approach, not the source of the current result. The omission of the scalar moiré potential U(r) in Eqs. (46)-(47) from the numerical calculation is a physical-approximation concern that could affect the accuracy of the 1 meV bandwidth, but it is not circularity: the calculation is explicitly for the AC band and does not define its output in terms of the neglected term. Overall, the central quantitative claim has independent content and is benchmarked against known structure-factor/Coulomb-energy results in the supplementary material, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the AC/ideal-band mapping and the variational projection onto the zero modes of the Trugman-Kivelson pseudopotential; no new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The only hand-tunable inputs are K and d, which are physical/model knobs rather than fits. The guiding-center coordinate is an effective variable, not a new entity.

free parameters (2)
  • K = varied 0–0.4 in toy model; ≈0.1 for tMoTe2
    Dimensionless amplitude of the periodic field modulation in Eq. (40); controls quantum-geometry inhomogeneity. A model knob, not fitted to the dispersion, but the predicted growth of bandwidth with K depends on it.
  • d (gate distance / screening length) = 1.0 l_B in toy model; ≈10 l_B ≈ 20 nm for tMoTe2
    Gate distance in the double-gate screened Coulomb interaction (Eq. 38); controls interaction screening. Taken from experimental geometry, not fitted to the dispersion, but the bandwidth grows with d.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Twisted MoTe2 valence band is accurately described by an Aharonov-Casher (ideal) band with non-uniform field from layer pseudospin, so Laughlin states and their quasihole zero modes exist.
    Invoked in Sec. IV.B after Eq. (45), based on Refs. [19,23]. If the band is not ideal, the exact zero-mode projection is invalid for MoTe2.
  • domain assumption For realistic interactions, the subspace of exact V_TK zero modes is the relevant low-energy space; the α→∞ limit is extrapolated to the small dispersion/gap ratio case.
    The controlled regime is αV_TK+V, α≫1 (Sec. III.C, VI). The extension to screened Coulomb is variational; the paper asserts the gap far exceeds the projected energy scale but does not compute state mixing.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar moiré potential U(r) in the MoTe2 continuum model does not affect the quasihole wavefunctions or dispersion in an essential way.
    H_cont = H_AC + U(r) is written in Eq. (46), but U(r) is never included in the quasihole construction (Eq. 34 uses only the Kähler potential Q from B_AC). This is an unquantified simplification specific to the MoTe2 application.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 34567 in / 17423 out tokens · 183908 ms · 2026-08-03T15:43:26.368040+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The discovery of fractional quantum anomalous Hall (FQAH) states in two-dimensional heterostructures has opened the door to realizing phases of dispersing anyons. Here, we develop an analytically controlled theory of anyon dispersion in FQAH states realized in ideal or Aharonov-Casher (AC) bands by projecting interactions onto the space of Laughlin quasiholes. Constructing quasihole momentum eigenstates allows efficient evaluation of the single quasihole dispersion using Monte Carlo. We find that the quasihole bandwidth grows with increasing quantum-geometry inhomogeneity of the AC band and with increasing interaction screening length. For realistic parameters relevant to the bands of twisted MoTe${}_2$, the quasihole bandwidth is of order 1 meV and increases with increasing displacement field, suggesting that itinerant-anyon physics may play an important role in sufficiently clean samples. Furthermore, we develop a microscopic Lagrangian framework in terms of a quasihole guiding-center coordinate, which reproduces the momentum-space formula for the dispersion. This approach reveals that quasihole dispersion originates from the combined effects of an interaction-generated periodic potential, arising from non-uniform quantum geometry of the single particle bands, and the quasihole many-body Berry phase arising from the background magnetic field. The latter endows the guiding-center coordinate with a noncommutative structure, converting the periodic potential into a finite dispersion. Finally, we outline how this framework generalizes to multiple quasiholes, enabling a microscopic theory of charged excitations in FQAH systems that retains only the anyon degrees of freedom.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.15863 by Eslam Khalaf, Qingchen Li, Tomohiro Soejima, Zihan Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Summary of the numerical results for Laughlin quasiholes in first harmonic approximated AC bands and tMoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustration of quasiholes obtaining dispersion in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Single particle quantum geometry, i.e. real space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Quasihole quantum geometry in AC band with first harmonic approximation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Single-component twisted $\mathbb{Z}_3$ orthogonal metal in an $e/3$-anyon fluid

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Doping the nu=1/3 fractional Chern insulator can produce a twisted Z_3 orthogonal metal — a single hidden Fermi surface of emergent e/3 fermions — whose pairing yields superconductors with arbitrary chiral central cha...

  2. Microsopic Theory of Spin Polarons in Chern Ferromagnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

    Closed-form wavefunctions for charge-e spin polarons in SU(2) Chern ferromagnets are exact eigenstates in ideal Chern-1 bands with contact interactions and remain stable variational states when quantum geometry is controlled.

  3. Dispersion of Anyon Bloch Bands

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Anyon Bloch bands in ideal FCIs have m-fold degeneracy in the magnetic BZ and bandwidth controlled by quantum geometry non-uniformity, with higher harmonics strongly suppressing dispersion through emergent symmetries.

  4. Exciton-Anyon Binding in Fractional Chern Insulators: Spectral Fingerprints

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exciton-quasihole bound states emerge in a tunable lattice model of fractional Chern insulators, appearing as isolated levels in the spectrum due to residual attraction from charge depletion.

  5. Fractionalized metals from doped anyons: Application to tMoTe2

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Lightly doped 2/3 FQAH anyons form U(3)-symmetric Z3 Orthogonal Metals of charge-1/3 fermions that explain large resistivity and pair into ordinary 2e superconductors.

  6. Coloring in anyon superconductivity

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Doping the ν=2/3 FQAH state produces a unifying 'quark metal' of charge-e/3 fermions whose superconducting and ferromagnetic instabilities reproduce and extend the known zoo of anyon-driven superconductors.

  7. How Similar Can Fractional Chern Insulators Be to Fractional Quantum Hall States? Moir\'e-Enhanced Gaps and Excitation-Spectrum Correspondence

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tuning reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of density modulations allows arbitrary enhancement of the FCI gap within projected flat-band theory and rescales the full low-energy spectrum to match Landau-level FQHS.

  8. Measuring anyon dispersion with tunneling probes

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tunneling probes can measure anyon dispersion via quasiparticle interference patterns and continuum thresholds in fractional Chern insulators.

  9. Exciton-Anyon Binding in Fractional Chern Insulators: Spectral Fingerprints

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    An exciton forms a bound state with a quasihole in a 1/3-filled fractional Chern insulator, with spectral signatures and binding energies of order 1 meV accessible to optical experiments.

  10. Superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid metals in a charge-1/3 anyon fluid

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Doping a fractional Chern insulator yields an anyon fluid that can form an SC* superconductor with residual Z2 order or a non-Fermi liquid Z3 orthogonal metal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith · cited by 9 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Laughlin quasiholes in uniform magnetic field The Laughlin state for a uniform magnetic field on the torus is given by [75] ψl({zi}) =σ l Y i<j f(z i −z j)q qY k=1 f(z CM −γ l k)e− i 2NΦ zCM∧γ l k (17) where we defineσ l =e − πi(q−1) 2q l which is an overall gauge choice for later convenience. Here,z CM = PNe i=1 zi and f(z) is defined in terms of the mod...

  2. [2]

    δB(z+R) =δB(z), whose average over the unit cell is zero

    Periodically-modulated magnetic field: Aharonov-Casher bands For AC bands, we consider the LLL in a field which has the form BAC(z) =ℓ −2 +δB(z) (7) whereδB(z) is a periodic field over the lattice Π, i.e. δB(z+R) =δB(z), whose average over the unit cell is zero. We define the magnetic potentialQ(z) such that 1 2 ∆Q(z) = 2∂z∂¯zQ(z,¯z) =−δB(z) (8) The singl...

  3. [3]

    Momentum eigenstates The commuting set of translations that leave the topo- logical sectors invariant is generated byα 1 =a 1 = L1/N1 =N 2δ1 andα 2 =qa 2 =qL 2/N2 =N 1δ2 as discussed earlier. Now we will show how to construct quasihole momentum eigenstates which are eigenstates of all magnetic translationsT α whereα=nα 1 +mα 2 satisfying Tα|ψκ⟩=η αeiκ·α|ψ...

  4. [4]

    Aharonov-Casher bands Given any wavefunction that is a zero mode of a Trugman-Kivelson pseudopotential in the LLL, we can construct the corresponding (unnormalized) wavefunc- tions in AC band as ψAC({zi}) =ψ({z i})Γ({zi}),Γ({z i}) = NeY i=1 e− 1 2 Q(zi) (34) This enables us to define quasihole momentum eigen- states in an AC band using Eqs. 34 and 33 and ...

  5. [5]

    0 χφaM -0.25 0.00 0.25 −1 0 1 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 χx χy FIG. 3. (a) Single particle quantum geometry, i.e. real space k¨ ahler potentialQ(r), for twisted MoTe2. The hexagon out- lines Wigner-Seitz moir´ e unit cell. (b) Dispersion of tMoTe2 with gate screened Coulomb interaction in the mBZ, here we takeN e = 40, d= 10l B ≈20 nm, θ= 3 ◦...

  6. [6]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature 17 626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. J. Bergholtz, Recent Developments in Frac- tional Chern Insulators (2022), arXiv:2208.08449 [cond- mat, physics:math-ph, physics:quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, C. R. Phys.14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    E. J. Bergholtz and Z. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B27, 1330017 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797921330017X

    doi:10.1142/s021797921330017x 2013

  14. [14]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Sheng, Z.-C

    D. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Nat. Com- mun.2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  16. [16]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Qi, Phys

    X.-L. Qi, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 126803 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B85, 241308 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    Y.-L. Wu, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 106802 (2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    Kourtis, T

    S. Kourtis, T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys- ical Review Letters112, 126806 (2014), arXiv:1310.6371 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Zhang, D

    Y.-H. Zhang, D. Mao, Y. Cao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. B99, 075127

  22. [22]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 106405 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. Mac- Donald, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Morales-Dur´ an, N

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, N. Wei, J. Shi, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 096602 (2024)

    2024

  25. [26]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  26. [27]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review B108, 205144 (2023), arXiv:2209.15023 [cond- mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [28]

    J. Shi, N. Morales-Dur´ an, E. Khalaf, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Phys. Rev. B110, 035130 (2024)

    2024

  28. [29]

    Repellin, Z

    C. Repellin, Z. Dong, Y.-H. Zhang, and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 187601

  29. [32]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176404 (2022)

    2022

  30. [33]

    Lu, Y.-M

    T. Lu, Y.-M. Wu, and L. H. Santos, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04685 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [34]

    Lu and L

    T. Lu and L. H. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186602 (2024)

    2024

  32. [35]

    Abouelkomsan, K

    A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Research5, L012015 (2023)

    2023

  33. [36]

    Abouelkomsan, Z

    A. Abouelkomsan, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 106803 (2020)

    2020

  34. [37]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Physical Review X15, 031069 (2025)

    2025

  35. [38]

    Divic, V

    S. Divic, V. Cr´ epel, T. Soejima, X.-Y. Song, A. Mil- lis, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vishwanath, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18175 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [39]

    P. A. Nosov, Z. Han, and E. Khalaf, Anyon superconduc- tivity and plateau transitions in doped fractional quan- tum anomalous hall insulators (2025), arXiv:2506.02108 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [40]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Anyon delocalization tran- sitions out of a disordered fqah insulator (2025), arXiv:2506.02128 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [41]

    Z. Han, T. Wang, Z. Dong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vish- wanath, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14894 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [42]

    R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2677 (1988)

    1988

  40. [43]

    Fetter, C

    A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Physical Review B39, 9679 (1989)

    1989

  41. [44]

    R. B. Laughlin, Science242, 525 (1988), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.242.4878.525

    doi:10.1126/science.242.4878.525 1988

  42. [45]

    Y.-H. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. I. Halperin, International Journal of Modern Physics B3, 1001 (1989)

    1989

  43. [46]

    Lee and M

    D.-H. Lee and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 903 (1989)

    1989

  44. [47]

    X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. B39, 11413 (1989)

    1989

  45. [48]

    Hosotani and S

    Y. Hosotani and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. B42, 342 (1990)

    1990

  46. [49]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. B41, 240 (1990)

    1990

  47. [50]

    Lee, International Journal of Modern Physics B05, 1695 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979291001607

    D.-H. Lee, International Journal of Modern Physics B05, 1695 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979291001607

    doi:10.1142/s0217979291001607 1991

  48. [51]

    Kitazawa and H

    Y. Kitazawa and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. B41, 11101 (1990)

    1990

  49. [52]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [53]

    Gon¸ calves, J

    M. Gon¸ calves, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, J. Herzog- Arbeitman, J. Yu, X. Xu, D. Xiao, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Spinless and spinful charge exci- tations in moir´ e fractional chern insulators (2025), arXiv:2506.05330 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [54]

    Z. Liu, B. Li, Y. Shi, and F. Wu, Phys. Rev. B112, 245104 (2025)

    2025

  52. [55]

    Gattu and J

    M. Gattu and J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236601 (2025)

    2025

  53. [56]

    Q. Xu, G. Ji, Y. Wang, H. Q. Trung, and B. Yang, Phys. Rev. B112, 235112 (2025)

    2025

  54. [57]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Phys. Rev. A19, 2461 (1979)

    1979

  55. [58]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. B104, 115160 (2021)

    2021

  56. [59]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. B104, 045104 (2021)

    2021

  57. [60]

    B. Mera, A. Zhang, and N. Goldman, arXiv:2106.00800

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [61]

    S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B31, 5280 (1985)

    1985

  59. [62]

    This form arises naturally when expanding any short range interaction in terms of pseudopotentials

  60. [63]

    Schleith, T

    M.-L. Schleith, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11211 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [65]

    B. A. Bernevig and N. Regnault, Physical Review B85, 075128 (2012)

    2012

  62. [66]

    Roy, Phys

    R. Roy, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  63. [67]

    P. J. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, and A. Vishwanath, Annals of Physics435, 168646 (2021)

    2021

  64. [68]

    J. Dong, P. J. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, and A. Vish- wanath, Phys. Rev. Research5, 023166 (2023)

    2023

  65. [69]

    J. Wang, S. Klevtsov, and Z. Liu, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 023167 (2023)

    2023

  66. [70]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 136502 (2023)

    2023

  67. [71]

    Haldane, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018)

    F. Haldane, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018). 18

    2018

  68. [72]

    P. J. Ledwith, G. Tarnopolsky, E. Khalaf, and A. Vish- wanath, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023237 (2020)

    2020

  69. [73]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605

  70. [74]

    R. B. Laughlin, Physical Review Letters50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  71. [75]

    G. S. Jeon and J. K. Jain, Physical Review B68, 165346 (2003)

    2003

  72. [76]

    T. H. Hansson, C.-C. Chang, J. K. Jain, and S. Viefers, Physical Review B76, 075347 (2007)

    2007

  73. [77]

    I. D. Rodriguez, A. Sterdyniak, M. Hermanns, J. K. Slingerland, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B85, 035128 (2012)

    2012

  74. [78]

    B. A. Bernevig and F. D. M. Haldane, Physical Review Letters102, 066802 (2009)

    2009

  75. [79]

    More precisely, we require the matrix elements of ˆVin the eigenbasis of ˆVTK to be small compared to the gap between the zero modes of ˆVTK and the excited states

  76. [80]

    J. Wang, S. D. Geraedts, E. H. Rezayi, and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B99, 125123 (2019)

    2019

  77. [81]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, The journal of chemical physics21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  78. [82]

    W. K. Hastings, (1970)

    1970

  79. [83]

    Levesque, J

    D. Levesque, J. J. Weis, and A. H. MacDonald, Physical Review B30, 1056 (1984)

    1984

  80. [84]

    Morf and B

    R. Morf and B. I. Halperin, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Con- densed Matter68, 391 (1987)

    1987

Showing first 80 references.