pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.03998 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-07 · 🧮 math.NT · math.CO

Restricted Overpartitions and concave compositions: their modularity and asymptotics

Koustav Banerjee , Kathrin Bringmann , Atul Dixit This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT math.CO
keywords restricted overpartitionsconcave compositionsmock theta functionsfalse theta functionsmixed modular formsasymptotics of partitionsrank statisticsq-series identities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Restricted overpartitions and concave compositions generate mixed modular forms that include mock theta and false theta functions, along with explicit asymptotic main terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines specific families of restricted overpartitions and concave compositions. Their generating functions turn out to combine ordinary modular forms with mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions at the same time. This produces examples of mixed modular structures that arise naturally from restricted partition problems. The authors also extract the leading asymptotic growth rates for the associated counting functions and analyze related rank statistics.

Core claim

We study restricted overpartitions and concave compositions. In several cases the resulting generating functions involve simultaneously modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions, illustrating the appearance of mixed modular structures in restricted partition problems. Moreover, we obtain their asymptotic main terms. We also study related rank statistics.

What carries the argument

The generating functions attached to the chosen restrictions on overpartitions and to concave compositions, which simultaneously encode modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions.

If this is right

  • Certain restricted overpartitions produce generating functions that mix four distinct modular objects.
  • The leading asymptotic term for the number of such objects in each family is explicitly computable.
  • Rank statistics attached to these objects admit modular or mock-modular descriptions.
  • Mixed modular structures appear systematically in restricted partition problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mixture of modular objects may arise for other natural restrictions on partitions that have not yet been examined.
  • The asymptotic formulas could be used to compare growth rates across different families of restricted objects.
  • Rank statistics might detect hidden symmetries that are invisible in the plain counting functions.
  • These examples suggest that mixed modularity is a common rather than exceptional feature of restricted generating functions.

Load-bearing premise

The particular restrictions placed on overpartitions and the definition of concave compositions yield generating functions whose modular properties can be extracted by standard methods without additional hidden conditions.

What would settle it

A concrete restricted overpartition family or concave composition family whose generating function cannot be written as a linear combination of modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions.

read the original abstract

In this paper we study restricted overpartitions and concave compositions. In several cases the resulting generating functions involve simultaneously modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions, illustrating the appearance of mixed modular structures in restricted partition problems. Moreover, we obtain their asymptotic main terms. We also study related rank statistics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines restricted overpartitions and concave compositions, establishing that their generating functions in several cases simultaneously involve modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, and false theta functions. It derives the asymptotic main terms for these generating functions and analyzes associated rank statistics.

Significance. If the modular identifications and asymptotic derivations hold, the work demonstrates the emergence of mixed modular structures in restricted partition problems, extending known techniques for q-series in partition theory and providing concrete asymptotic main terms that can be tested against numerical data.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract states that generating functions involve multiple types of modular objects but does not list the specific restrictions on overpartitions or the precise definition of concave compositions; adding these in §1 would clarify the scope.
  2. [§2] Notation for the generating functions (e.g., how the restrictions are encoded in the q-products) should be introduced uniformly before the modular analysis begins.
  3. [§4] The asymptotic main terms are stated without explicit error bounds; including the form of the remainder term (even if O(1)) would strengthen the claims in the asymptotics section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful summary of our work on restricted overpartitions and concave compositions, their assessment of its significance in illustrating mixed modular structures, and their recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we have no points to address point-by-point at this stage. We will incorporate any minor editorial or presentational suggestions in the revised manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines restricted overpartitions and concave compositions directly from combinatorial restrictions, then derives their generating functions and identifies mixed modular structures (modular forms, mock theta functions, mock Maass theta functions, false theta functions) via standard analytic techniques in partition theory. Asymptotics follow from these modular properties using established methods, and rank statistics are analyzed as a standard companion. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the central claims rest on external q-series identities and asymptotic tools that are independent of the present definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the given text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5345 in / 1100 out tokens · 34534 ms · 2026-05-16T16:26:20.863352+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agarwal,A family of basic hypergeometric and combinatorial identities and certain summation formulae, Indian J

    R. Agarwal,A family of basic hypergeometric and combinatorial identities and certain summation formulae, Indian J. pure appl. Math.12(1981), 728–737

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Andrews,Enumerative proofs of certainq-identities, Glasg

    G. Andrews,Enumerative proofs of certainq-identities, Glasg. Math. J.8(1967), 33–40

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook I

    G. Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook I. Partialθ-functions, Adv. Math.41(1981), 137–172

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook IV: stacks and alternating parity in partitions, Adv

    G. Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook IV: stacks and alternating parity in partitions, Adv. Math.53(1984), 55–74

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook V: Euler’s partition identity, Adv

    G. Andrews,Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook V: Euler’s partition identity, Adv. Math.61(1986), 156–164

    work page 1986

  6. [6]

    Andrews,The theory of partitions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998

    G. Andrews,The theory of partitions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Andrews and B

    G. Andrews and B. Berndt,Ramanujan’s lost notebook, Part II, Springer, New York, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Andrews and B

    G. Andrews and B. Berndt,Ramanujan’s lost notebook, Part V, Springer, New York, 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Andrews, F

    G. Andrews, F. Dyson, and D. Hickerson,Partitions and indefinite quadratic forms, Invent. Math.91(1988), 391–407

    work page 1988

  10. [10]

    Andrews and R

    G. Andrews and R. Kumar,Rank, two-color partitions and mock theta functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.153 (2025), 4669–4682

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Andrews, R

    G. Andrews, R. Rhoades, and S. Zwegers,Modularity of the concave composition generating function, Algebra Number Theory7(2013), 2103–2139

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Atkin and P

    A. Atkin and P. Swinnerton-Dyer,Some properties of partitions, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)3(1954), 84–106

    work page 1954

  13. [13]

    Berkovich and F

    A. Berkovich and F. Garvan,Some observations on Dyson’s new symmetries of partitions, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A100(2002), 61–93

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Berndt,Number theory in the spirit of Ramanujan, Student Mathematical Library, 34, Amer

    B. Berndt,Number theory in the spirit of Ramanujan, Student Mathematical Library, 34, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2006

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Berndt and R

    B. Berndt and R. Rankin,Ramanujan: letters and commentary, History of Mathematics9(1995), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI

    work page 1995

  16. [16]

    Bhoria, P

    S. Bhoria, P. Eyyunni, and B. Maji,Generalizations of fiveq-series identities of Ramanujan and unexplored weighted partition identities, Ramanujan J.58(2022), 435–462

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Bringmann, W

    K. Bringmann, W. Craig, and C. Nazaroglu,On the asymptotic behavior for partitions separated by parity, Electron. J. Combin.32:1(2025), 1–18

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Bringmann and K

    K. Bringmann and K. Ono,Dyson’s ranks and Maass forms, Ann. Math.171(2010), 419–449

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Bringmann, K

    K. Bringmann, K. Ono, and R. Rhoades,Eulerian series as modular forms, J. Amer. Math. Soc.21(2008), 1085–1104

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Bringmann, C

    K. Bringmann, C. Jennings-Shaffer, and K. Mahlburg,On a Tauberian theorem of Ingham and Euler–Maclaurin summation, Ramanujan J.61(2021), 55–86

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Bringmann and C

    K. Bringmann and C. Nazaroglu,A framework for modular properties of false theta functions, Res. Math. Sci. 6:30(2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Choi,The basic bilateral hypergeometric series and the mock theta functions, Ramanujan J.24(2011), 345–386

    Y. Choi,The basic bilateral hypergeometric series and the mock theta functions, Ramanujan J.24(2011), 345–386

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Cohen,q-identities for Maass waveforms, Invent

    H. Cohen,q-identities for Maass waveforms, Invent. Math.91(1988), 409–422

    work page 1988

  24. [24]

    Corteel and J

    S. Corteel and J. Lovejoy,Overpartitions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.356(2004), 1623–1635

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Corson, D

    D. Corson, D. Favero, K. Liesinger, and S. Zubairy,Characters andq-series inQ( √ 2), J. Number Theory107 (2004), 392–405

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    Donato,On minimal excludant over overpartitions, arXiv:2507.04402v1

    J. Donato,On minimal excludant over overpartitions, arXiv:2507.04402v1

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Dyson,Some guesses in the theory of partitions, Eureka (Cambridge)8(1944), 10–15

    F. Dyson,Some guesses in the theory of partitions, Eureka (Cambridge)8(1944), 10–15

    work page 1944

  28. [28]

    Fine,Basic hypergeometric series and applications, Amer

    N. Fine,Basic hypergeometric series and applications, Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, RI, 1988

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    Garvan,Weighted partition identities and divisor sums, Frontiers in orthogonal polynomials and q-Series

    F. Garvan,Weighted partition identities and divisor sums, Frontiers in orthogonal polynomials and q-Series. (2018), 239–249

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Hardy and S

    G. Hardy and S. Ramanujan,Asymptotic formulae in combinatory analysis, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)17 (1918), 75–115

    work page 1918

  31. [31]

    Ingham,A Tauberian theorem for partitions, Ann

    A. Ingham,A Tauberian theorem for partitions, Ann. Math.42(1941), 1075–1090

    work page 1941

  32. [32]

    Lovejoy and R

    J. Lovejoy and R. Osburn,M 2-rank differences for partitions without repeated odd parts, J. Th´ eor. Nombres Bordeaux21(2009), 313–334

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    McIntosh,Second order mock theta functions, Canad

    R. McIntosh,Second order mock theta functions, Canad. Math. Bull.50(2007), 284–290

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Ramanujan,Some properties ofp(n), the number of partitions ofn, Math

    S. Ramanujan,Some properties ofp(n), the number of partitions ofn, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. XIX(1919), 207–210

    work page 1919

  35. [35]

    Watson,The final problem: An account of the mock-theta functions, J

    G. Watson,The final problem: An account of the mock-theta functions, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)11(1936), 55–80. 23

    work page 1936

  36. [36]

    Zagier,The Mellin transform and related analytic techniques, Appendix to E

    D. Zagier,The Mellin transform and related analytic techniques, Appendix to E. Zeidler, Quantum field theory I: Basics in mathematics and physics. A bridge between mathematicians and physicists, 305–323, Springer, Berlin (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Zagier,Quantum modular forms, In: Quanta of Math: Conference in honor of Alain Connes, Clay Mathe- matics Proceedings 11, AMS and Clay Mathematics Institute, (2010), 656–675

    D. Zagier,Quantum modular forms, In: Quanta of Math: Conference in honor of Alain Connes, Clay Mathe- matics Proceedings 11, AMS and Clay Mathematics Institute, (2010), 656–675

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Zwegers,Mock theta functions, Ph.D

    S. Zwegers,Mock theta functions, Ph.D. Thesis, Universit¨ at Utrecht (2002)

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    Zwegers,Mock Maass theta functions, Q

    S. Zwegers,Mock Maass theta functions, Q. J. Math.63(2012), 753–770, University of Cologne, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Weyertal 86-90, 50931 Cologne, Germany Email address:kbanerj1@uni-koeln.de Email address:kbringma@uni-koeln.de Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat,...

    work page 2012