arxiv: 2602.09370 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-10 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Phase-Aware Policy Learning for Skateboard Riding of Quadruped Robots via Feature-wise Linear Modulation

Minsung Yoon , Jeil Jeong , Sung-Eui Yoon

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO

keywords reinforcement learningquadruped robotskateboard controlphase-aware policyfeature-wise linear modulationlocomotionpolicy transfer

0 comments

The pith

A single reinforcement-learning policy lets quadruped robots ride skateboards by modulating features according to the riding phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Phase-Aware Policy Learning (PAPL) to let a quadruped robot control a skateboard through reinforcement learning. It adds phase-conditioned Feature-wise Linear Modulation layers to both the actor and critic networks so one unified policy can handle the distinct goals of each skateboarding phase while still sharing knowledge about the robot body across phases. This addresses the cyclic nature of the task and the multi-modal control demands that arise from perception-driven interactions. Simulation tests confirm accurate command tracking, and the method transfers to a real robot.

Core claim

Phase-Aware Policy Learning integrates phase-conditioned Feature-wise Linear Modulation layers into actor and critic networks, producing a unified policy that captures phase-dependent behaviors while sharing robot-specific knowledge across phases.

What carries the argument

Phase-conditioned Feature-wise Linear Modulation layers inserted into actor and critic networks that scale and shift features based on the current skateboarding phase.

If this is right

The unified policy produces higher command-tracking accuracy than non-modulated baselines in simulation.
Ablation studies isolate the contribution of the phase-conditioned layers and the shared network structure.
Locomotion efficiency exceeds that of both pure leg and wheel-leg baselines.
The learned policy transfers directly to a physical quadruped robot on a skateboard.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same phase-modulation idea could apply to other periodic robot tasks such as trotting or galloping without needing separate policies for each gait segment.
Jointly learning phase estimation together with the policy might remove the need for an external phase signal at deployment.
The approach suggests that many cyclic control problems can be solved with a single network rather than an ensemble of phase-specific controllers.

Load-bearing premise

Accurate phase information must be available or reliably estimated both while training the policy and when the robot rides the skateboard in the real world.

What would settle it

A policy trained without any phase input achieves comparable command-tracking accuracy and locomotion efficiency across all phases, or real-robot experiments show that phase-estimation noise causes the modulated policy to lose stability at phase transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.09370 by Jeil Jeong, Minsung Yoon, Sung-Eui Yoon.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Illustration of the phase clock concept that manages the cyclic nature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Phase-Aware Policy Learning (PAPL) Framework for Skateboard Riding. (1) Simulation environments modeling skateboard–robot interaction. (2) Command scheduling that procedurally increases riding difficulty for broad command-space coverage [17]. (3) Phase-clock representation that alternates over time between pushing, transition, and carving modes. (4) An asymmetric actor–critic architecture: the critic lever… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: To represent the riding task’s cyclic and multi-modal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Multilayer perceptron (MLP) network variants. (a) Standard MLP, (b) FiLM-modulated MLP with phase-conditioned feature-wise modulation, and (c) Mixture-of-Experts MLP with phase-based expert weight blending. B. Phase-Aware Policy Composition To encode phase-dependent multi-modal behaviors within a unified policy, we compose the actor f actor θ and critic f critic θ networks with Feature-wise Linear Modulati… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Visualization of action a, proprioceptive observation oprop, and criticvalue V distributions over 80 s of skateboard riding. Action and observation data are projected using t-SNE [34], and critic values are visualized as histograms. Data points are color-coded by the corresponding mode M(ϕt) at the time of collection. Further details are provided in Sec. V-A. reduction could exaggerate separation, the obs… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Left: Component configurations of the proposed PAPL framework and ablated variants. Middle: Tracking error heatmaps with contours, where darker regions indicate lower errors. Contours represent iso-error boundaries, while red regions denote constraint violations when the robot either overturned or deviated more than 0.5 m from the board. Right: Command-area curves showing the percentage of commands tracked… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Consumed motor power distributions for three locomotion strategies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Real-world demonstrations of quadruped skateboarding. (a) Snap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Skateboards offer a compact and efficient means of transportation as a type of personal mobility device. However, controlling them with legged robots poses several challenges for policy learning due to perception-driven interactions and multi-modal control objectives across distinct skateboarding phases. To address these challenges, we introduce Phase-Aware Policy Learning (PAPL), a reinforcement-learning framework tailored for skateboarding with quadruped robots. PAPL leverages the cyclic nature of skateboarding by integrating phase-conditioned Feature-wise Linear Modulation layers into actor and critic networks, enabling a unified policy that captures phase-dependent behaviors while sharing robot-specific knowledge across phases. Our evaluations in simulation validate command-tracking accuracy and conduct ablation studies quantifying each component's contribution. We also compare locomotion efficiency against leg and wheel-leg baselines and show real-world transferability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies phase-conditioned FiLM layers to actor and critic networks for a single RL policy on quadruped skateboard riding, which is a reasonable specialization of existing modulation techniques but rests on unshown phase sensing.

read the letter

The main point is that they condition both policy and value networks on skateboard phase using FiLM layers so one set of weights can handle the different behaviors across the cycle while still sharing the robot's dynamics. This is a direct way to inject the cyclic structure without training separate policies for each phase. The simulation ablations and baseline comparisons are the usual checks for this kind of work, and claiming real-robot transfer is standard for the area. Those parts are fine as far as they go. The clear gap is phase estimation. The abstract stresses perception-driven interactions yet never says how phase is computed from IMU, vision, or contact data, or how errors in that signal are handled. If the phase input is noisy or delayed, the modulation applies the wrong scaling and shift, which undercuts the claim that a unified policy captures the distinct objectives. Without numbers on tracking error, phase accuracy, or failure cases, it is hard to judge whether the method actually delivers. This is aimed at people already working on RL for periodic legged tasks. A reader in that niche could borrow the architecture as a template, but the paper needs the sensing details and quantitative results before it becomes a reference. I would send it to peer review because the framing is clear and the problem is real, even though the current version is light on the parts that matter most for verification.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Phase-Aware Policy Learning (PAPL), a reinforcement learning framework for quadruped robots riding skateboards. It integrates phase-conditioned Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM) layers into the actor and critic networks to produce a single unified policy that captures phase-dependent behaviors across the cyclic phases of skateboarding while sharing robot-specific parameters. The work reports simulation results on command-tracking accuracy, ablation studies on component contributions, comparisons to leg and wheel-leg baselines for locomotion efficiency, and real-world transfer experiments.

Significance. If the phase-conditioned modulation successfully encodes distinct control objectives without requiring separate policies and if phase estimates remain reliable under sensor noise, the method could offer a parameter-efficient approach to multi-modal cyclic tasks in legged robotics. The emphasis on real-world transfer and ablation studies provides a concrete testbed for evaluating whether FiLM-based conditioning preserves shared knowledge across phases better than standard conditioning techniques.

major comments (2)

[Section 3 (Method) and Section 4 (Experiments)] The central claim that a single policy with phase-conditioned FiLM layers captures distinct phase-dependent behaviors while sharing knowledge rests on the assumption that accurate phase information is supplied at every timestep. The manuscript provides no description of the phase estimator (e.g., from IMU, vision, or contact forces) nor any analysis of how estimation errors propagate through the modulation layers; this directly affects the validity of the real-world transfer claim and the assertion that separate policies are unnecessary.
[Abstract and Section 4] The abstract states that simulation evaluations 'validate command-tracking accuracy' and that ablation studies 'quantify each component's contribution,' yet the provided text contains no numerical results, error bars, or statistical significance tests for these claims. Without these data it is impossible to assess whether the reported improvements over baselines are load-bearing or merely marginal.

minor comments (2)

[Section 3.1] Notation for the phase variable and the FiLM parameters (scale and shift) should be introduced once with explicit definitions rather than appearing first in the network diagrams.
[Section 4.3] The comparison to 'leg and wheel-leg baselines' would benefit from a brief statement of whether those baselines also receive phase information or are phase-agnostic, to clarify the source of any efficiency gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 3 (Method) and Section 4 (Experiments)] The central claim that a single policy with phase-conditioned FiLM layers captures distinct phase-dependent behaviors while sharing knowledge rests on the assumption that accurate phase information is supplied at every timestep. The manuscript provides no description of the phase estimator (e.g., from IMU, vision, or contact forces) nor any analysis of how estimation errors propagate through the modulation layers; this directly affects the validity of the real-world transfer claim and the assertion that separate policies are unnecessary.

Authors: We agree that explicit details on the phase estimator are necessary to support the claims. The phase signal in our experiments is derived from a combination of IMU angular velocity and contact force thresholds to detect the cyclic skateboarding phases. We will add a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 describing this estimator and include new simulation results in Section 4 that inject Gaussian noise into the phase input to quantify robustness of the FiLM modulation. These additions will directly address the propagation of estimation errors and strengthen the real-world transfer discussion. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract states that simulation evaluations 'validate command-tracking accuracy' and that ablation studies 'quantify each component's contribution,' yet the provided text contains no numerical results, error bars, or statistical significance tests for these claims. Without these data it is impossible to assess whether the reported improvements over baselines are load-bearing or merely marginal.

Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract and main text would benefit from explicit numerical values. The full manuscript contains figures with mean command-tracking errors and standard deviations computed over 10 random seeds, plus ablation tables, but these were not summarized numerically in the prose. In the revision we will update the abstract with key quantitative results (e.g., percentage reductions in tracking error versus baselines) and insert a compact results table in Section 4 that reports means, standard deviations, and p-values from paired t-tests to demonstrate statistical significance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; novel RL architecture with independent empirical validation

full rationale

The paper introduces PAPL by integrating phase-conditioned FiLM layers into actor and critic networks as a design choice to handle cyclic skateboarding phases. This is presented as an architectural extension of standard RL methods, not a derivation that reduces to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. Simulation ablations, command-tracking metrics, and real-robot transfer provide external validation independent of the inputs. No load-bearing steps invoke self-citations for uniqueness theorems, smuggle ansatzes, or rename known results as new predictions; the central claim remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; typical RL training hyperparameters are assumed but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5436 in / 1110 out tokens · 24360 ms · 2026-05-16T05:58:17.061994+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean arrow_from_z unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ϕ_t = 2πt/T_ϕ mod 2π ... M(ϕ_t) = CARVING if ϕ_t ∈ [0.2π,0.8π], PUSHING if ϕ_t ∈ [1.2π,1.8π]

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Scientific exploration of challenging planetary analog environments with a team of legged robots

P. Arm et al., “Scientific exploration of challenging planetary analog environments with a team of legged robots”,Science Robotics, vol. 8, no. 80, pp. eade9548, 2023

work page 2023
[2]

Multimodality robotic systems: Integrated combined legged-aerial mobility for subterranean search-and-rescue

B. Lindqvist et al., “Multimodality robotic systems: Integrated combined legged-aerial mobility for subterranean search-and-rescue”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 154, pp. 104134, 2022

work page 2022
[3]

Advances in real-world applications for legged robots

C. D. Bellicoso et al., “Advances in real-world applications for legged robots”,Field Robotics, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1311–1326, 2018

work page 2018
[4]

Raibo2: Highly efficient quadruped robot com- pleting full marathon with a single battery charge

J. Hwangbo et al., “Raibo2: Highly efficient quadruped robot com- pleting full marathon with a single battery charge”, 2025

work page 2025
[5]

Learning skateboarding for humanoid robots through massively parallel reinforcement learning

W. Thibault et al., “Learning skateboarding for humanoid robots through massively parallel reinforcement learning”,arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07846, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

3d walking and skating motion generation using divergent component of motion and gauss pseudospectral method

N. Takasugi et al., “3d walking and skating motion generation using divergent component of motion and gauss pseudospectral method”, in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 5003–5010

work page 2017
[7]

Extended three-dimensional walking and skating motion generation for multiple noncoplanar contacts with anisotropic friction: Application to walk and skateboard and roller skate

N. Takasugi et al., “Extended three-dimensional walking and skating motion generation for multiple noncoplanar contacts with anisotropic friction: Application to walk and skateboard and roller skate”,IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2018

work page 2018
[8]

Riding and speed governing for parallel two- wheeled scooter based on sequential online learning control by hu- manoid robot

K. Kimura et al., “Riding and speed governing for parallel two- wheeled scooter based on sequential online learning control by hu- manoid robot”, inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–9

work page 2018
[9]

Motion planning and feedback control for bipedal robots riding a snakeboard

J. Anglingdarma et al., “Motion planning and feedback control for bipedal robots riding a snakeboard”, inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 2818–2824

work page 2021
[10]

A torque-controlled humanoid robot riding on a two- wheeled mobile platform

S. Xin et al., “A torque-controlled humanoid robot riding on a two- wheeled mobile platform”, inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1435–1442

work page 2017
[11]

Towards humanoids using personal transporters: Learning to ride a segway from humans

V . Rajendran et al., “Towards humanoids using personal transporters: Learning to ride a segway from humans”, inIEEE RAS/EMBS Inter- national Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE, 2022, pp. 01–08

work page 2022
[12]

Feedback control of a cassie bipedal robot: Walking, standing, and riding a segway

Y . Gong et al., “Feedback control of a cassie bipedal robot: Walking, standing, and riding a segway”, inAmerican Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 4559–4566

work page 2019
[13]

Optimization based dynamic skateboarding of quadrupedal robot

Z. Xu et al., “Optimization based dynamic skateboarding of quadrupedal robot”, inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 8058–8064

work page 2024
[14]

Discrete-time hybrid automata learning: Legged locomotion meets skateboarding

H. Liu et al., “Discrete-time hybrid automata learning: Legged locomotion meets skateboarding”,arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01842, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Unitree, “Go1”,https://www.unitree.com/go1, 2021, Ac- cessed: 2024-11-27

work page 2021
[16]

The skateboard speed wobble

M. Rosatello et al., “The skateboard speed wobble”, inInter- national Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2015, vol. 57168, p. V006T10A054

work page 2015
[17]

Rapid locomotion via reinforcement learning

G. B. Margolis et al., “Rapid locomotion via reinforcement learning”, The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 572–587, 2024

work page 2024
[18]

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

J. Schulman et al., “Proximal policy optimization algorithms”,arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[19]

A reduction of imitation learning and structured pre- diction to no-regret online learning

S. Ross et al., “A reduction of imitation learning and structured pre- diction to no-regret online learning”, inInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011, pp. 627–635

work page 2011
[20]

Learning belief representations for imitation learning in pomdps

T. Gangwani et al., “Learning belief representations for imitation learning in pomdps”, inUncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 2020, pp. 1061–1071

work page 2020
[21]

Memory-based deep reinforcement learning for pomdps

L. Meng et al., “Memory-based deep reinforcement learning for pomdps”, inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 5619–5626

work page 2021
[22]

Deep whole-body control: learning a unified policy for manipulation and locomotion

Z. Fu et al., “Deep whole-body control: learning a unified policy for manipulation and locomotion”, inConference on Robot Learning (CoRL). PMLR, 2023, pp. 138–149

work page 2023
[23]

Preparing for the unknown: Learning a universal policy with online system identification

W. Yu et al., “Preparing for the unknown: Learning a universal policy with online system identification”, inRobotics: Science and Systems, 2017

work page 2017
[24]

Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain

J. Lee et al., “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain”,Science Robotics, vol. 5, no. 47, pp. eabc5986, 2020

work page 2020
[25]

Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild

T. Miki et al., “Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild”,Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 62, pp. eabk2822, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

Extreme parkour with legged robots

X. Cheng et al., “Extreme parkour with legged robots”, inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 11443–11450

work page 2024
[27]

Rma: Rapid motor adaptation for legged robots

A. Kumar et al., “Rma: Rapid motor adaptation for legged robots”, inRobotics: Science and Systems, 2021

work page 2021
[28]

Adapting rapid motor adaptation for bipedal robots

A. Kumar et al., “Adapting rapid motor adaptation for bipedal robots”, inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1161–1168

work page 2022
[29]

Enhancing navigation efficiency of quadruped robots via leveraging personal transportation platforms

M. Yoon et al., “Enhancing navigation efficiency of quadruped robots via leveraging personal transportation platforms”, inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2025, pp. 11184–11190

work page 2025
[30]

Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer

E. Perez et al., “Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer”, inAAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2018, vol. 32

work page 2018
[31]

User-conditioned neural control policies for mobile robotics

L. Bauersfeld et al., “User-conditioned neural control policies for mobile robotics”, inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1342–1348

work page 2023
[32]

Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion

C. Chi et al., “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion”,The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), p. 02783649241273668, 2023

work page 2023
[33]

Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learning

V . Makoviychuk et al., “Isaac gym: High performance gpu- based physics simulation for robot learning”,arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470, 2021

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[34]

Visualizing data using t-sne

L. Maaten et al., “Visualizing data using t-sne”,Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), vol. 9, no. Nov, pp. 2579–2605, 2008

work page 2008