arxiv: 2602.14026 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Coexistence of topological Anderson insulator and multifractal critical phase in a non-Hermitian quasicrystal

Qi-Bo Zeng , Rong L\"u

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

keywords non-Hermitiantopological Anderson insulatormultifractal critical phasequasicrystalSu-Schrieffer-Heeger modellocalization transitionnonreciprocal hoppingphase diagram

0 comments

The pith

A non-Hermitian quasicrystal model hosts a topological Anderson insulator that coexists with a multifractal critical phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a one-dimensional non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain in which intracell hopping is made both nonreciprocal and quasiperiodically modulated. This setup enlarges the topological regime and produces a topological Anderson insulator phase driven by the quasiperiodic disorder. Beyond the topological transition, rising nonreciprocity triggers a cascade of localization changes in which bulk states pass from extended through multifractal critical to fully localized, with the extended-to-critical point aligning exactly with the real-to-complex eigenvalue transition. Complete phase diagrams are obtained and exact analytical expressions are derived for the boundaries of both topological and localization transitions, revealing an unanticipated region of coexistence between the topological Anderson insulator and the multifractal critical states.

Core claim

In the proposed non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with quasiperiodically modulated nonreciprocal intracell hopping, quasiperiodic modulation substantially enhances the topological regime and induces a non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator phase; increasing nonreciprocity then drives a cascade of localization transitions in which all bulk eigenstates evolve from extended to multifractal critical and ultimately to localized, with the extended-to-critical transition coinciding exactly with the real-complex spectral transition. Exact analytical boundaries are derived for both topological and localization transitions, establishing an unanticipated coexistence of the topological ande

What carries the argument

The one-dimensional non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with quasiperiodically modulated nonreciprocal intracell hopping, which supplies the analytical solvability needed to locate the exact phase boundaries and to produce the reported coexistence region.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional form of the quasiperiodic modulation is assumed to permit exact analytical solutions for the phase boundaries.

What would settle it

Replacing the specific cosine-based quasiperiodic modulation with a different quasiperiodic function while keeping all other parameters fixed and checking whether the coexistence region of the topological Anderson insulator and multifractal critical phase survives or vanishes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14026 by Qi-Bo Zeng, Rong L\"u.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Schematic of the topolectrical cir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The interplay of topology, disorder, and non-Hermiticity gives rise to phenomena beyond the conventional classification of quantum phases. We propose a one-dimensional non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with quasiperiodically modulated nonreciprocal intracell hopping. We show that quasiperiodic modulation can substantially enhance the topological regime and, remarkably, induce a non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator (TAI) phase. Beyond the topological transition, increasing nonreciprocity drives a cascade of localization transitions in which all bulk eigenstates evolve from extended to multifractal critical and ultimately to localized states. Strikingly, the extended-to-critical transition coincides exactly with a real-complex spectral transition. We establish complete phase diagrams and derive exact analytical boundaries for both topological and localization transitions, uncovering an unanticipated coexistence of TAI and multifractal critical phases. Finally, we propose a feasible implementation in topolectrical circuits. Our results reveal a new paradigm for studying the cooperative effects of topology, quasiperiodicity, and non-Hermiticity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives exact analytical boundaries for a non-Hermitian TAI that coexists with a multifractal critical phase, but those boundaries appear tied to one specific choice of quasiperiodic modulation.

read the letter

The paper examines a non-Hermitian SSH chain in which the intracell hopping is both nonreciprocal and modulated by a quasiperiodic potential. It reports that this setup enlarges the topological regime into an Anderson insulator phase and then produces a window of multifractal states before the bulk states localize. The extended-to-multifractal transition coincides exactly with the real-to-complex spectral transition, and the authors supply closed-form expressions for the boundaries of both the topological and localization transitions along with full phase diagrams. They also outline a topolectrical-circuit realization.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 1D non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with quasiperiodically modulated nonreciprocal intracell hopping. It claims that this modulation enlarges the topological regime, induces a non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator (TAI), and produces a cascade of localization transitions (extended to multifractal critical to localized) whose extended-to-critical point coincides exactly with the real-complex spectral transition. Exact analytical boundaries are derived for both topological and localization transitions, complete phase diagrams are presented, and an unanticipated TAI-multifractal coexistence is reported; a topolectrical-circuit implementation is suggested.

Significance. If the exact boundaries and the reported coincidence survive scrutiny, the work would supply a concrete, analytically tractable example of cooperative topology-quasiperiodicity-non-Hermiticity effects and a feasible experimental platform, thereby strengthening the case for non-Hermitian TAI phases beyond Hermitian disorder-driven topology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and phase-boundary derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the phase boundaries: the claim of exact analytical expressions for both the topological transition and the extended-multifractal-localized cascade rests on the specific functional form chosen for the quasiperiodic modulation of the nonreciprocal hopping. The manuscript must demonstrate that the same boundaries and the exact coincidence with the real-complex transition persist for a generic incommensurate potential (e.g., a deformed cosine or a different irrational frequency), otherwise the coexistence and the “complete phase diagrams” remain tied to a solvable ansatz rather than a general feature of non-Hermitian quasicrystals.
[Numerical results and localization diagnostics] The numerical verification of the multifractal critical regime and the TAI-coexistence region: the abstract asserts that all bulk eigenstates evolve through the cascade, yet the strength of this claim depends on the precise definition of the multifractal spectrum and the system-size scaling used to distinguish critical from localized states. Explicit finite-size scaling plots and the precise diagnostic (e.g., participation ratio, fractal dimension) must be shown to confirm that the reported transition points are not shifted by post-hoc parameter tuning.

minor comments (2)

Clarify the precise definition of the non-Hermitian topological invariant used to identify the TAI phase (e.g., winding number, biorthogonal polarization) and state whether it remains quantized inside the multifractal region.
The circuit-implementation proposal would benefit from an explicit parameter mapping (capacitance/inductance values) and a brief discussion of how disorder and nonreciprocity are realized in the topolectrical network.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and valuable suggestions. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and phase-boundary derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the phase boundaries: the claim of exact analytical expressions for both the topological transition and the extended-multifractal-localized cascade rests on the specific functional form chosen for the quasiperiodic modulation of the nonreciprocal hopping. The manuscript must demonstrate that the same boundaries and the exact coincidence with the real-complex transition persist for a generic incommensurate potential (e.g., a deformed cosine or a different irrational frequency), otherwise the coexistence and the “complete phase diagrams” remain tied to a solvable ansatz rather than a general feature of non-Hermitian quasicrystals.

Authors: Our exact analytical boundaries are derived specifically for the quasiperiodic modulation form employed in the model, which enables closed-form solutions. This is a deliberate choice to obtain exact results, providing a concrete example of the TAI and multifractal coexistence in non-Hermitian quasicrystals. We do not assert that these exact expressions hold for arbitrary incommensurate potentials. The manuscript presents complete phase diagrams for this model. We will revise the abstract and the derivation section to explicitly note the specificity of the functional form and clarify that the results are for this solvable case, while emphasizing its relevance as a benchmark. No additional calculations for generic potentials will be added, as they fall outside the scope of the current work. revision: partial
Referee: [Numerical results and localization diagnostics] The numerical verification of the multifractal critical regime and the TAI-coexistence region: the abstract asserts that all bulk eigenstates evolve through the cascade, yet the strength of this claim depends on the precise definition of the multifractal spectrum and the system-size scaling used to distinguish critical from localized states. Explicit finite-size scaling plots and the precise diagnostic (e.g., participation ratio, fractal dimension) must be shown to confirm that the reported transition points are not shifted by post-hoc parameter tuning.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for more explicit numerical diagnostics. In the revised version, we will add finite-size scaling plots of the inverse participation ratio and the fractal dimension D_2 as functions of system size for parameters in the extended, critical, and localized phases. These will demonstrate the scaling behaviors: constant IPR for extended, power-law for critical, and exponential decay for localized. The transition points are determined from where the scaling exponent changes, and we will show they align with the analytical boundaries without post-hoc adjustment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives exact analytical boundaries for topological and localization transitions directly from the model Hamiltonian with the chosen quasiperiodic modulation of nonreciprocal hopping. These boundaries are obtained via transfer-matrix or duality methods applied to the specific functional form, rather than being fitted to data or defined circularly in terms of the outputs. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear; the coexistence of TAI and multifractal phases follows from the analysis of this solvable model without reducing predictions to inputs by construction. The derivation remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of a specific quasiperiodic modulation applied to the nonreciprocal intracell hopping of the SSH chain; this functional form is postulated to allow closed-form solutions and is not derived from more fundamental principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The non-Hermitian SSH Hamiltonian with quasiperiodic modulation admits exact analytical treatment for topological and localization transitions.
Invoked to obtain the exact boundaries stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5489 in / 1307 out tokens · 63907 ms · 2026-05-15T22:23:04.592980+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Constants, IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation phi_golden_ratio, washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

α=(√5−1)/2 ... γ0=ln|v|+√(v²−λ²)/(2|w|) ... γ(E)=max{0,ln|λ|/(2|w|)} ... extended-to-critical transition coincides exactly with real-complex spectral transition
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.RealityFromDistinction, IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.AlphaDerivationExplicit reality_from_one_distinction, alphaProvenanceCert refines

?

refines
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

exact analytical boundaries for both topological and localization transitions ... unanticipated coexistence of TAI and multifractal critical phases

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82,3045 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83,1057 (2011)

work page 2011
[3]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90,015001 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Cao and J

H. Cao and J. Wiersig, Dielectric microcavities: Model systems for wave chaos and non-Hermitian physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.87,61 (2015)

work page 2015
[5]

V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves in PT-symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035002 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69,249 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93,015005 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80,5243 (1998)

work page 1998
[9]

C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians, Rep. Prog. Phys.70,947 (2007)

work page 2007
[10]

Non-Hermitian Topological Theory of Finite-Lifetime Quasiparticles: Prediction of Bulk Fermi Arc Due to Exceptional Point

V. Kozii and L. Fu, Non-Hermitian topological theory of finite-lifetime quasiparticles: prediction of bulk Fermi arc due to exceptional point, arXiv:1708.05841

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[11]

Z. H. Musslimani, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N. Christodoulides, Optical solitons in PT periodic po- tentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.100,030402 (2008)

work page 2008
[12]

L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian pho- tonics based on parity–time symmetry, Nat. Photonics 11,752 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

K. F. Luo, J. J. Feng, Y. X. Zhao, and R. Yu, Nodal manifolds bounded by exceptional points on non- Hermitian honeycomb lattices and electrical-circuit real- ization, arXiv:1810.09231

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Commun. Phys. 1, 39 (2018)

work page 2018
[15]

Sahin, M

H. Sahin, M. B. A. Jalil, C. H. Lee, Topolectrical circuits-recent experimental advances and developments, arXiv:2502.18563

work page arXiv
[16]

W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45,444016 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

Hu and E

H. Hu and E. Zhao, Knots and non-Hermitian Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.126,010401 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

K. Wang, A. Dutt, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands, Nature 598,59 (2021)

work page 2021
[19]

Zhou, Z.-C

Z. Zhou, Z.-C. Xu, and L.-J. Lang, Non-Abelian ge- ometry, topology, and dynamics of a nonreciprocal Su- Schrieffer-Heeger ladder, Phys. Rev. B112,094305 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Yao and Z

S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121,136802 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

Okuma, K

N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124,086801 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

Zhang, Z

K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109,1492 (1958)

work page 1958
[25]

Li, R.-L

J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.102,136806 (2009)

work page 2009
[26]

C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. Tworzyd lo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of the topo- logical Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.103,196805 (2009)

work page 2009
[27]

Y. Xing, L. Zhang, and J. Wang, Topological Anderson insulator phenomena, Phys. Rev. B84,035110 (2011)

work page 2011
[28]

Jiang, L

H. Jiang, L. Wang, Q.-F. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Nu- merical study of the topological Anderson insulator in HgTe/CdTe quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B80,165316 (2009)

work page 2009
[29]

Zhang, R.-L

Y.-Y. Zhang, R.-L. Chu, F.-C. Zhang, and S.-Q. Shen, Localization and mobility gap in the topological Ander- son insulator, Phys. Rev. B85,035107 (2012)

work page 2012
[30]

J. Song, H. Liu, H. Jiang, Q.-F. Sun, and X. C. Xie, De- pendence of topological Anderson insulator on the type of disorder, Phys. Rev. B85,195125 (2012)

work page 2012
[31]

Atland, D

A. Atland, D. Bagrets, L. Fritz, A. Kamenev, and H. Schmiedt, Quantum criticality of quasi-one-dimensional topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 206602 (2014)

work page 2014
[32]

Mondragon-Shem and T

I. Mondragon-Shem and T. L. Hughes, Topological criti- cality in the chiral-symmetric AIII class at strong disor- der, Phys. Rev. Lett.113,046802 (2014)

work page 2014
[33]

Zhang, B.-L

Z.-Q. Zhang, B.-L. Wu, J. Song, and H. Jiang, Topolog- ical Anderson insulator in electric circuits, Phys. Rev. B 100,184202 (2019)

work page 2019
[34]

Hsu and T.-W

H.-C. Hsu and T.-W. Chen, Topological Anderson in- sulating phases in the long-range Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B102,205425 (2020)

work page 2020
[35]

Liu, et al

G.-G. Liu, et al. Topological Anderson insulator in dis- ordered photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.125,133603 (2020)

work page 2020
[36]

Zhang, L.-Z

G.-Q. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, D.-W. Zhang, and S.-L. Zhu, Connecting topological Anderson and Mott insulators in disordered interacting fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B104,L161118 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

Z. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Exact mobility edges and topological Anderson insulating phase in a slowly varying quasiperiodic model, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)534,2200203, (2022)

work page 2022
[38]

Ren, et al

M. Ren, et al. Realization of gapped and ungapped pho- tonic topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132,066602 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

Chen, et al

X.-D. Chen, et al. Realization of time-reversal invari- ant photonic topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133,133802 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

R. Ji, Y. Zhang, S. Chen, and Z. Xu, Control- lable emergence of multiple topological Anderson insu- lator phases in photonic Su-Schrieffer-Heeger lattices, arXiv:2512.06851

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[41]

X. Wang, L. Wang, and S. Chen, Topological Anderson insulator and reentrant topological transitions in a mo- 6 saic trimer lattice, arXiv:2601.13760

work page arXiv
[42]

Hatano and D

N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)

work page 1996
[43]

N. M. Shnerb and D. R. Nelson, Winding numbers, complex currents, and non-Hermitian localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.80,5172 (1998)

work page 1998
[44]

Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X8,031079 (2018)

work page 2018
[45]

Jiang, L.-J

H. Jiang, L.-J. Lang, C. Yang, S.-L. Zhu, and S. Chen, Interplay of non-Hermitian skin effects and Anderson lo- calization in nonreciprocal quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. B100,054301 (2019)

work page 2019
[46]

Zeng and Y

Q.-B. Zeng and Y. Xu, Winding numbers and generalized mobility edges in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Re- search2,033052 (2020)

work page 2020
[47]

Y. Liu, Y. Wang, X. J. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Exact mobility edges, PT-symmetry breaking, and skin effect in one-dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B103,014203 (2021)

work page 2021
[48]

Zhang, L.-Z

D.-W. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, L.-J. Lang, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhang, Non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulators, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.63,267062 (2020)

work page 2020
[49]

H. Liu, Z. Su, Z.-Q. Zhang, and H. Jiang, Topological An- derson insulator in two-dimensional non-Hermitian sys- tems, Chinese Phys. B29,050502 (2020)

work page 2020
[50]

Tang, L.-F

L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators in two-dimensional non- Hermitian disordered systems, Phys. Rev. A101,063612 (2020)

work page 2020
[51]

Tang, S.-N

L.-Z. Tang, S.-N. Liu, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators with different bulk states in quasiperiodic chains, Phys. Rev. A105,063327 (2022)

work page 2022
[52]

Q. Lin, T. Li, L. Xiao, K. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of non-Hermitian topological Anderson in- sulator in quantum dynamics, Nat. Commun.13,3229 (2022)

work page 2022
[53]

Aubry and G

S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc.3,133 (1980)

work page 1980
[54]

P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proc. Phys. Soc. A68,874 (1955)

work page 1955
[55]

Das Sarma, S

S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, Mobility edge in a model one-dimensional potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2144 (1988)

work page 1988
[56]

F. M. Izrailev and A. A. Krokhin, Localization and the mobility edge in one-dimensional potentials with corre- lated disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.82,4062 (1999)

work page 1999
[57]

Ganeshan, J

S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.114,146601 (2015)

work page 2015
[58]

X. Deng, S. Ray, S. Sinha, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and L. San- tos, One-dimensional quasicrystals with power-law hop- ping, Phys. Rev. Lett.123,025301 (2019)

work page 2019
[59]

Y. Wang, X. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Yao, S. Chen, J. You, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125,196604 (2020)

work page 2020
[60]

T. T. Geisel and G. Petschel, New class of level statis- tics in quantum systems with unbounded diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.66,1651 (1991)

work page 1991
[61]

S. Y. Jitomirskaya, Metal-insulator transition for the al- most mathieu operator, Ann. Math.3,150 (1999)

work page 1999
[62]

T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B. I. Shraiman, Fractal measures and their singular- ities: The characterization of strange sets, Phys. Rev. A 33,1141 (1986)

work page 1986
[63]

A. D. Mirlin, Y. V. Fyodorov, A. Mildenberger, and F. Evers, Exact relations between multifractal exponents at the Anderson transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.97,046803 (2006)

work page 2006
[64]

Y. Wang, C. Cheng, X.-J. Liu, and D. Yu, Many-body critical phase: extended and nonthermal, Phys. Rev. Lett.126,080602 (2021)

work page 2021
[65]

Y. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Niu, D. Yu, and X.-J. Liu, Re- alization and detection of nonergodic critical phases in an optical Raman lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.125,073204 (2020)

work page 2020
[66]

T. Xiao, D. Xie, Z. Dong, T. Chen, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Observation of topological phase with critical localization in a quasi-periodic lattice, Sci. Bull.66,2175 (2021)

work page 2021
[67]

Li, et al

H. Li, et al. Observation of critical phase transition in a generalized Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model with supercon- ducting circuits, npj Quantum Inf9,40 (2023)

work page 2023
[68]

Pal and D

A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization phase transition, Phys. Rev. B82,174411 (2010)

work page 2010
[69]

Nandkishore and D

R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6,15 (2015)

work page 2015
[70]

Purkayastha, S

A. Purkayastha, S. Sanyal, A. Dhar, and M. Kulkarni, Anomalous transport in the Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model in isolated and open systems, Phys. Rev. B97,174206 (2018)

work page 2018
[71]

D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91,021001 (2019)

work page 2019
[72]

L.-J. Lang, X. Cai, and S. Chen, Edge states and topo- logical phases in one-dimensional optical superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.108,220401 (2012)

work page 2012
[73]

Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109,106402 (2012)

work page 2012
[74]

Y. E. Kraus and O. Zilberberg, Topological equiva- lence between the Fibonacci quasicrystal and the Harper model, Phys. Rev. Lett.109,116404 (2012)

work page 2012
[75]

Ganeshan, K

S. Ganeshan, K. Sun, and S. Das Sarma, Topologi- cal zero-Energy modes in gapless commensurate Aubry- Andr´ e-Harper models, Phys. Rev. Lett.110,180403 (2013)

work page 2013
[76]

Cai, L.-J

X. Cai, L.-J. Lang, S. Chen, and Y. Wang, Topologi- cal superconductor to Anderson localization transition in one-dimensional incommensurate lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.110,176403 (2013)

work page 2013
[77]

Wang, X.-J

J. Wang, X.-J. Liu, G. Xianlong, and H. Hu, Phase dia- gram of a non-Abelian Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model with p-wave superfluidity, Phys. Rev. B93,104504 (2016)

work page 2016
[78]

Q.-B. Zeng, S. Chen, and R. L¨ u, Generalized Aubry- Andr´ e-Harper model with p-wave superconducting pair- ing, Phys. Rev. B94,125408 (2016)

work page 2016
[79]

Zeng, Y.-B

Q.-B. Zeng, Y.-B. Yang, and Y. Xu, Topological phases in non-Hermitian Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper models, Phys. Rev. B101,020201(R) (2020)

work page 2020
[80]

Zeng and R

Q.-B. Zeng and R. L¨ u, Topological phases and Anderson localization in off-diagonal mosaic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 104,064203 (2021). 7

work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.