pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.06851 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-07 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.dis-nn· quant-ph

Multiple re-entrant topological windows induced by generalized Bernoulli disorder

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph
keywords re-entrant topologyBernoulli disorderSu-Schrieffer-Heeger modelzero-mode localizationchiral displacementphotonic waveguidesone-dimensional lattices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generalized Bernoulli disorder in intradimer hoppings creates multiple disconnected topological windows in a one-dimensional chiral lattice.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain in which the intradimer hopping amplitudes follow a generalized Bernoulli distribution. By changing the specific values that appear in the distribution and the probabilities assigned to them, the authors show that the system develops an adjustable number of separate intervals of topological behavior separated by trivial regions. These re-entrant windows are located analytically by finding where the inverse localization length of the zero-energy modes drops to zero, and the resulting boundaries match direct numerical checks. The mean chiral displacement is introduced as a dynamical signature that registers the transitions, and a photonic-waveguide realization is outlined.

Core claim

In the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with generalized Bernoulli disorder confined to the intradimer hoppings, the topological phase diagram contains multiple re-entrant windows whose boundaries are fixed by the zeros of the inverse localization length of the zero modes; both the number and the widths of these windows are controlled by the values and probabilities that define the disorder distribution.

What carries the argument

Inverse localization length of zero modes, which supplies the analytic condition separating topological and trivial regions for any choice of generalized Bernoulli parameters.

If this is right

  • Increasing the number of distinct values in the Bernoulli distribution increases the number of topological windows.
  • The probabilities assigned to each value directly determine the relative widths of the topological and trivial intervals.
  • The mean chiral displacement changes its long-time behavior precisely at the analytically derived critical points.
  • The same disorder-induced windows should appear in photonic waveguide arrays fabricated with the corresponding intradimer couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineered multivalued disorder of this form could provide a practical route to devices that operate in several distinct topological regimes without changing the lattice geometry.
  • The dynamical probe based on chiral displacement may allow time-resolved observation of the transitions in optical or cold-atom experiments.
  • Analogous re-entrant windows are likely to appear in other one-dimensional chiral models once the same generalized Bernoulli statistics are imposed on the appropriate hopping terms.

Load-bearing premise

The topological phase boundaries are set exactly by the inverse localization length of zero modes, without appreciable shifts from finite-size effects or contributions from nonzero-energy states.

What would settle it

A transfer-matrix or exact-diagonalization calculation performed for a chosen set of disorder values and probabilities that yields a different count of intervals with nontrivial topological invariant than the number predicted by setting the inverse localization length to zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06851 by Ruijiang Ji, Shu Chen, Yunbo Zhang, Zhihao Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Topological phase diagram characterized by the d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Widths of the first and second TAI phases as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Topological phase diagram characterized by the d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Disorder-averaged mean chiral displacement operat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate re-entrant topological behavior in a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with generalized Bernoulli-type disorder in the intradimer hopping amplitudes. We show that varying the values and probabilities of the disorder distribution systematically changes the number and widths of disconnected topological windows. The phase boundaries are obtained analytically from the inverse localization length of zero modes and agree with numerical calculations. We further show that the mean chiral displacement provides a useful dynamical probe of the disorder-induced topological transitions, and we outline a possible implementation in photonic waveguide lattices. These results clarify how the structure of a multivalued disorder distribution influences re-entrant topological behavior in one-dimensional chiral lattices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines re-entrant topological behavior in a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with generalized Bernoulli-type disorder restricted to the intradimer hopping amplitudes. Varying the disorder values and probabilities is shown to systematically control the number and widths of disconnected topological windows. Phase boundaries are obtained analytically from the inverse localization length of zero modes and reported to agree with numerical calculations. The mean chiral displacement is introduced as a dynamical probe of the transitions, and a possible photonic waveguide lattice implementation is outlined.

Significance. If the results hold, the work clarifies the role of multivalued disorder distributions in producing multiple re-entrant topological windows in 1D chiral lattices. The analytical, parameter-free derivation of boundaries via the inverse localization length (rather than fitted quantities) is a clear strength, as is the use of mean chiral displacement for dynamical characterization. The photonic implementation suggestion adds experimental relevance for optics.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the disorder-averaged inverse localization length of zero modes fully determines the topological phase boundaries (without finite-size or rare-configuration corrections) is load-bearing for the multi-window results. Explicit checks for system-size dependence and rare-sequence effects in the re-entrant regimes would be needed to confirm that the reported numerical agreement is not affected by these factors.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the system sizes used in the numerical diagonalization or transfer-matrix calculations to allow direct assessment of finite-size convergence.
  2. A brief remark on the range of disorder probabilities and values explored would help readers reproduce the reported changes in the number of topological windows.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive evaluation of our manuscript. We address the major comment below and will strengthen the presentation accordingly in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the disorder-averaged inverse localization length of zero modes fully determines the topological phase boundaries (without finite-size or rare-configuration corrections) is load-bearing for the multi-window results. Explicit checks for system-size dependence and rare-sequence effects in the re-entrant regimes would be needed to confirm that the reported numerical agreement is not affected by these factors.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of finite-size convergence and the role of rare sequences is valuable for confirming the robustness of the reported agreement. The analytical phase boundaries are obtained from the disorder-averaged Lyapunov exponent of the transfer matrix in the thermodynamic limit, which by construction incorporates the full disorder distribution without finite-size corrections. Our numerical results, obtained via exact diagonalization on chains of several hundred sites averaged over hundreds of realizations, already show close quantitative agreement with these boundaries throughout the re-entrant windows. In the revised manuscript we will add supplementary figures that explicitly demonstrate the convergence of the numerically extracted boundaries with increasing system size (e.g., N = 200, 500, 1000) in representative re-entrant regimes. Regarding rare-sequence effects, the ensemble averaging used in both the analytical derivation and the numerics suppresses contributions from atypical configurations; we will add a short discussion clarifying that no systematic deviations attributable to rare events were observed in our data. If the referee deems it necessary, we can further include targeted checks on selected atypical sequences. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytical derivation of phase boundaries from inverse localization length is independent and non-circular

full rationale

The paper computes phase boundaries analytically via the inverse localization length of zero modes for the generalized Bernoulli disorder on the SSH chain. This follows from the standard transfer-matrix or Lyapunov-exponent formalism applied directly to the multivalued hopping distribution; the resulting expression for the localization length is not obtained by fitting to the target topological windows or by re-using the windows themselves. Numerical agreement is presented as external validation. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain. The method is self-contained against the model's Hamiltonian and disorder statistics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard results from localization theory and chiral symmetry in 1D lattices. The disorder parameters are varied as control knobs rather than fitted to match a target outcome. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • disorder values and probabilities
    The specific hop values and their occurrence probabilities are chosen and varied to control the number and widths of topological windows.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The inverse localization length of zero modes determines the topological phase boundaries in the disordered chiral chain.
    Invoked to obtain the analytical phase boundaries that agree with numerics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1430 out tokens · 62390 ms · 2026-05-17T01:12:16.521395+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Coexistence of topological Anderson insulator and multifractal critical phase in a non-Hermitian quasicrystal

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A non-Hermitian quasicrystal model exhibits coexistence of a topological Anderson insulator phase and a multifractal critical phase, with exact analytical boundaries for both topological and localization transitions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Solja c c i c \' c , Topological photonics, Nat. Photon. 8, 821 (2014)

  2. [2]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

  3. [3]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012)

  4. [4]

    Verbin, O

    M. Verbin, O. Zilberberg, Y. Lahini, Y. E. Kraus, and Y. Silberberg, Topological pumping over a photonic Fibonacci quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B 91, 064201 (2015)

  5. [5]

    St\" u tzer, Y

    S. St\" u tzer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Photonic topological Anderson insulators, Nature(London) 560, 461 (2018)

  6. [6]

    J. Deng, H. Dong, C. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Yuan, X. Zhu, F. Jin, H. Li, Z. Wang, H. Cai, C. Song, H. Wang, J. Q. You, and D.-W. Wang, Observing the quantum topology of light, Science 378, 966 (2022)

  7. [7]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaitre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice, Nat. Photon. 11, 651 (2017)

  8. [8]

    Parto, S

    M. Parto, S. Wittek, H. Hodaei, G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, J. Ren, M. C. Rechtsman, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Edge-mode lasing in 1D topological active arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113901 (2018)

  9. [9]

    H. Zhao, P. Miao, M. H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El-Ganainy, H. Schomerus, and L. Feng, Topological hybrid silicon microlasers, Nat. Commun. 9, 981 (2018)

  10. [10]

    T. Dai, A. Ma, J. Mao, Y. Ao, X. Jia, Y. Zheng, C. Zhai, Y. Yang, Z. Li, B. Tang, J. Luo, B. Zhang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, A programmable topological photonic chip, Nat. Mater. 23, 928 (2024)

  11. [11]

    W. Wang, Z. Shen, Y. J. Tan, K. Chen, and R. Singh, On-chip topological edge state cavities, Light Sci. Appl. 14, 330 (2025)

  12. [12]

    Cheng, C

    X. Cheng, C. Jouvaud, X. Ni, S. H. Mousavi, A. Z. Genack, and A. B. Khanikaev, Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 15, 542 (2016)

  13. [13]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

  14. [14]

    Nomura and N

    K. Nomura and N. Nagaosa, Surface-quantized anomalous Hall current and the magnetoelectric effect in magnetically disordered topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 166802 (2011)

  15. [15]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008)

  16. [16]

    H. L. Li, C.-Z. Chen, H. Jiang, and X. C. Xie, Coexistence of quantum Hall and quantum anomalous Hall phases in disordered MnBi _ 2 Te _ 4 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 236402 (2021)

  17. [17]

    Prodan, T

    E. Prodan, T. L. Hughes, and B. A. Bernevig, Entanglement spectrum of a disordered topological Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 115501 (2010)

  18. [18]

    Cheng, H

    X. Cheng, H. Jiang, J. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. S. Ang, and C. H. Lee, Non-Hermitian effective PT -symmetry restoration from structural disorder, Front. Phys. 21, 035201 (2026)

  19. [19]

    S. S. Krishtopenko, M. Antezza, and F. Teppe, Disorder-induced topological phase transition in HgCdTe crystals, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115203 (2022)

  20. [20]

    Hu, Y.-R

    Y.-S. Hu, Y.-R. Ding, J. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C.-Z. Chen, Disorder and phase diagrams of higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094201 (2021)

  21. [21]

    Wu and J.-J

    H.-B. Wu and J.-J. Liu, Anderson disorder-induced nontrivial topological phase transitions in two-dimensional topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115430 (2021)

  22. [22]

    Ong and C

    Z.-Y. Ong and C. H. Lee, Transport and localization in a topological phononic lattice with correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134203 (2016)

  23. [23]

    Song and E

    J. Song and E. Prodan, AIII and BDI topological systems at strong disorder, Phys. Rev. B 89, 224203 (2014)

  24. [24]

    Girschik, F

    A. Girschik, F. Libisch, and S. Rotter, Topological insulator in the presence of spatially correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. B 88, 014201 (2013)

  25. [25]

    C.-A. Li, B. Fu, Z.-A. Hu, J. Li, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological phase transitions in disordered electric quadrupole insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 166801 (2020)

  26. [26]

    A. Chen, J. Maciejko, and I. Boettcher, Anderson localization transition in disordered hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 066101 (2024)

  27. [27]

    Wang, Y.-B

    J.-H. Wang, Y.-B. Yang, N. Dai, and Y. Xu, Structural-disorder-induced second-order topological insulators in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 206404 (2021)

  28. [28]

    C. Wang, T. Cheng, Z. Liu, F. Liu, and H. Huang, Structural amorphization-induced topological order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 056401 (2022)

  29. [29]

    Grindall, A

    C. Grindall, A. C. Tyner, A.-K. Wu, T. L. Hughes, and J. H. Pixley, Separate surface and bulk topological Anderson localization transitions in disordered axion insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 226601 (2025)

  30. [30]

    Li, R.-L

    J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136806 (2009)

  31. [31]

    Jiang, L

    H. Jiang, L. Wang, Q.-F. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Numerical study of the topological Anderson insulator in HgTe/CdTe quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165316 (2009)

  32. [32]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. Tworzyd o, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of the topological Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 196805 (2009)

  33. [33]

    H.-M. Guo, G. Rosenberg, G. Refael, and M. Franz, Topological Anderson insulator in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 216601 (2010)

  34. [34]

    J. Song, H. Liu, H. Jiang, Q.-F. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Dependence of topological Anderson insulator on the type of disorder, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195125 (2012)

  35. [35]

    Titum, N

    P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. C. Rechtsman, and G. Refael, Disorder-induced Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 056801 (2015)

  36. [36]

    Tang, L.-F

    L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators in two-dimensional non-Hermitian disordered systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063612 (2020)

  37. [37]

    Zhang, D

    W. Zhang, D. Zou, Q. Pei, W. He, J. Bao, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Experimental observation of higher-order topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 146802 (2021)

  38. [38]

    Peng, C.-B

    T. Peng, C.-B. Hua, R. Chen, D.-H. Xu, and B. Zhou, Topological Anderson insulators in an Ammann-Beenker quasicrystal and a snub-square crystal, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085307 (2021)

  39. [39]

    Cui, R.-Y

    X. Cui, R.-Y. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Photonic Z _ 2 topological Anderson insulators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 043902 (2022)

  40. [40]

    Q. Lin, T. Li, L. Xiao, K. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator in quantum dynamics, Nat. Commun. 13, 3229 (2022)

  41. [41]

    Cheng, T

    X. Cheng, T. Qu, L. Xiao, S. Jia, J. Chen, and L. Zhang, Topological Anderson amorphous insulator, Phys. Rev. B 108, L081110 (2023)

  42. [42]

    M. Ren, Y. Yu, B. Wu, X. Qi, Y. Wang, X. Yao, J. Ren, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, H. Chen, X.-J. Liu, Z. Chen, and Y. Sun, Realization of gapped and ungapped photonic topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066602 (2024)

  43. [43]

    Sobrosa, M

    N. Sobrosa, M. Gon c c alves, and E. V. Castro, Instability of quadratic band crossing systems to topological Anderson insulating phases, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184206 (2024)

  44. [44]

    B. D. Assun c c \ ao, G. J. Ferreira, and C. H. Lewenkopf, Phase transitions and scale invariance in topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201102 (2024)

  45. [45]

    Zuo, J.-R

    Z.-W. Zuo, J.-R. Lin, and D. Kang, Topological inverse Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. B 110, 085157 (2024)

  46. [46]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, P. Massignan, T. L. Hughes, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires, Science 362, 929 (2018)

  47. [47]

    G.-G. Liu, Y. Yang, X. Ren, H. Xue, X. Lin, Y.-H. Hu, H.-X. Sun, B. Peng, P. Zhou, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological Anderson Insulator in Disordered Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 133603 (2020)

  48. [48]

    Longhi, Topological Anderson phase in quasi-periodic waveguide lattices, Opt

    S. Longhi, Topological Anderson phase in quasi-periodic waveguide lattices, Opt. Lett. 45, 4036 (2020)

  49. [49]

    Zhang, L.-Z

    G.-Q. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, D.-W. Zhang, and S.-L. Zhu, Connecting topological Anderson and Mott insulators in disordered interacting fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B 104, L161118 (2021)

  50. [50]

    Tang, S.-N

    L.-Z. Tang, S.-N. Liu, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators with different bulk states in quasiperiodic chains, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063327 (2022)

  51. [51]

    Z. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Exact mobility edges and topological Anderson insulating phase in a slowly varying quasiperiodic model, Ann. Phys.(Berlin) 534, 2200203 (2022)

  52. [52]

    X. Li, H. Xu, J. Wang, L.-Z. Tang, D.-W. Zhang, C. Yang, T. Su, C. Wang, Z. Mi, W. Sun, X. Liang, M. Chen, C. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Linghu, J. Han, W. Liu, Y. Feng, P. Liu, G. Xue, J. Zhang, Y. Jin, S.-L. Zhu, H. Yu, S. P. Zhao, and Q.-K. Xue, Mapping the topology-localization phase diagram with quasiperiodic disorder using a programmable superconducting simul...

  53. [53]

    Wang, S.-Z

    X.-M. Wang, S.-Z. Li, and Z. Li, Emergent topological re-entrant phase transition in a generalized quasiperiodic modulated Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022214 (2025)

  54. [54]

    Sinha, T

    A. Sinha, T. Shit, A. Tetarwal, D. Sen, and S. Mukherjee, Probing the topological Anderson transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices via chiral displacement and wavelength tuning, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013512 (2025)

  55. [55]

    Liu, G.-Q

    S.-N. Liu, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators induced by random binary disorders, Phys. Lett. A 431, 128004 (2022)

  56. [56]

    A. K. Ghosh, T. Nag, and A. Saha, Floquet second-order topological Anderson insulator hosting corner localized modes, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125427 (2024)

  57. [57]

    Ji and Z

    R. Ji and Z. Xu, Fibonacci-modulation-induced multiple topological Anderson insulators, Commun. Phys. 8, 336 (2025)

  58. [58]

    I. C. Fulga, F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Scattering formula for the topological quantum number of a disordered multimode wire, Phys. Rev. B 83, 155429 (2011)

  59. [59]

    Mondragon-Shem, T

    I. Mondragon-Shem, T. L. Hughes, J. Song, and E. Prodan, Topological criticality in the chiral-symmetric AIII class at strong disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046802 (2014)

  60. [60]

    Christodoulides, F

    D. Christodoulides, F. Lederer, and Y. Silberberg, Discretizing light behaviour in linear and nonlinear waveguide lattices, Nature 424, 817 (2003)

  61. [61]

    Longhi, Quantum-optical analogies using photonic structures, Laser Photon

    S. Longhi, Quantum-optical analogies using photonic structures, Laser Photon. Rev. 3, 243 (2009)

  62. [62]

    I. L. Garanovich, S. Longhi, A. A. Sukhorukov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Light propagation and localization in modulated photonic lattices and waveguides, Phys. Rep. 518, 1 (2012)

  63. [63]

    Corrielli, G

    G. Corrielli, G. Della Valle, A. Crespi, R. Osellame, and S. Longhi, Observation of surface states with algebraic localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 220403 (2013)

  64. [64]

    Z. Lu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Xu, Reentrant localization transitions in a topological Anderson insulator: A study of a generalized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger quasicrystal, Front. Phys. 20, 024204 (2025)

  65. [65]

    Cardano, A

    F. Cardano, A. D'Errico, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, B. Piccirillo, C. de Lisio, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, E. Santamato, L. Marrucci, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Detection of Zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons, Nat. Commun. 8, 15516 (2017)