pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.16252 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A XRISM view of the iron line complex in NGC 1068: Rethinking the prototypical Compton-thick AGN

S. Bianchi , B. Vander Meulen , E. Bertola , V. Braito , A. Comastri , P. Cond\`o , M. Dadina , R. Della Ceca
show 27 more authors
A. De Rosa V. E. Gianolli M. Guainazzi K. Iwasawa E. Kammoun M. Laurenti A. Luminari A. Marinucci G. Matt G. Matzeu R. Middei G. Miniutti E. Nardini F. Nicastro F. Panessa P.-O. Petrucci E. Piconcelli C. Pinto G. Ponti R. Serafinelli P. Severgnini D. Tagliacozzo F. Tombesi A. Tortosa F. Ursini C. Vignali L. Zappacosta
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords NGC 1068XRISMFe K linesCompton-thick AGNoutflowfluorescenceactive galactic nucleiX-ray spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

NGC 1068 iron lines show neutral fluorescence arises in optically thin gas rather than a classical Compton-thick reflector.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes XRISM spectra of the iron K complex in NGC 1068 to examine the origin of the neutral fluorescent lines and the nature of the highly ionized emission. The observed Kβ to Kα ratio and the tight upper limit on the Compton shoulder indicate that most of the neutral emission cannot come from reflection off a uniform, optically thick medium. Instead, the data favor emission from optically thin or only mildly Compton-thick material. The broad Fe XXV and Fe XXVI lines match the velocity structure of known optical and infrared outflows, pointing to a faster, more ionized inner phase of the same wind. This picture implies a stratified environment where cold and hot gas occupy distinct regions around the active nucleus.

Core claim

The iron-K emission of NGC1068 reveals a stratified circumnuclear environment in which neutral and highly ionized components arise in physically distinct regions. The neutral Fe K fluorescence originates predominantly in optically thin or mildly Compton-thick material, despite the persistently Compton-thick line-of-sight obscuration, indicating a geometrically complex cold reprocessor. The highly ionized iron emission lines trace a fast component consistent with a warm bipolar outflow on parsec scales, whose large velocities and inferred energetics suggest that it may represent an efficient channel for feedback in a heavily obscured Seyfert galaxy.

What carries the argument

The Fe Kβ/Kα flux ratio together with the upper limit on the Compton shoulder, which together constrain the optical depth and geometry of the neutral reflecting gas.

Load-bearing premise

The large velocity widths of the Fe XXV and Fe XXVI lines directly trace the same biconical outflow seen in optical and infrared lines without requiring separate kinematic modeling.

What would settle it

A spatially resolved map or higher-resolution velocity profile of the Fe XXV/XXVI emission that fails to align with the known biconical geometry of the [O III] and [O IV] outflow.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16252 by A. Comastri, A. De Rosa, A. Luminari, A. Marinucci, A. Tortosa, B. Vander Meulen, C. Pinto, C. Vignali, D. Tagliacozzo, E. Bertola, E. Kammoun, E. Nardini, E. Piconcelli, F. Nicastro, F. Panessa, F. Tombesi, F. Ursini, G. Matt, G. Matzeu, G. Miniutti, G. Ponti, K. Iwasawa, L. Zappacosta, M. Dadina, M. Guainazzi, M. Laurenti, P. Cond\`o, P.-O. Petrucci, P. Severgnini, R. Della Ceca, R. Middei, R. Serafinelli, S. Bianchi, V. Braito, V. E. Gianolli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Local fits to the neutral fluorescence lines in the XRISM/Resolve spectrum of NGC 1068. Top: Fe Kα complex (6.0–6.5 keV, rest frame). Black points show the data and the black histogram the best-fitting model, consisting of a narrow core (red) and a broad base (blue; see text), added to the baseline continuum (grey). Magenta dashed curves show bound electron-scattering Compton-shoulder profiles with fluxes … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: XRISM/Resolve spectrum of NGC 1068 with the broad Fe xxv Heα and Fe xxvi Lyα emission lines. The spectrum is shown in the rest frame and is fitted with the outflow model described in Sect. 4.2.1. The data are plotted in black, while the model components for the Fe xxv and Fe xxvi lines are shown in blue; the total model is shown in grey. The neutral Fe Kβ line, shown in red, is also included in the fit. Ve… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper panel: Velocity shifts of the Fe Kβ centroid energy rel￾ative to the neutral reference of Hölzer et al. (1997), shown as a func￾tion of ionization stage. Blue diamonds show the shifts predicted by the atomic calculations of Palmeri et al. (2003), while the grey horizon￾tal band indicates the value measured in the XRISM/Resolve spectrum. The green square and red triangle mark the experimental neutral … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: High-velocity bi-polar outflow model adopted to reproduce the broad Fe xxv and Fe xxvi lines observed with XRISM. The intrinsic line spectrum was calculated with XSTAR, the integrated velocity profile was calculated with the SKIRT code. We assume that the broad Fe xxv and Fe xxvi lines are emitted di￾rectly by a high-velocity outflow in the polar direction, extending Article number, page 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radiative transfer results for the scattering (UM mirror) scenario. The scattered Fe xxv and Fe xxvi lines are shifted by ∼ 80 eV due to inelastic Compton scattering, inconsistent with the observed line shift (∆E < 15 eV, consistent with zero). The SKIRT radiative transfer results are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze a XRISM/Resolve observation of NGC1068, focusing on the Fe K$\alpha$ and Fe K$\beta$ fluorescent lines and on the Fe XXV and Fe XXVI emission complexes. Line centroid energies, intrinsic widths, flux ratios, and constraints on the Compton shoulder are derived through local spectral fitting, and compared with atomic calculations and theoretical predictions. The centroid energies of the Fe K$\alpha$ and Fe K$\beta$ lines tightly constrain the emitting material to be neutral or near-neutral. The observed Fe K$\beta$/K$\alpha$ ratio, together with the stringent upper limit on the Compton shoulder ($\lesssim$8--11% of the core flux), disfavour reflection dominated by a homogeneous, classical Compton-thick medium, indicating that most of the neutral Fe K$\alpha$ emission arises in optically thin or moderately Compton-thick gas. The Fe XXV and Fe XXVI emission lines exhibit remarkably large velocity widths, of several thousand km~s$^{-1}$. These broad profiles closely resemble the integrated optical and infrared [O III] and [O IV] lines associated with the large-scale biconical outflow, and are naturally interpreted as the X-ray signature of a more highly ionized, faster, and more spatially confined phase of the same outflow. The iron-K emission of NGC1068 reveals a stratified circumnuclear environment in which neutral and highly ionized components arise in physically distinct regions. The neutral Fe K fluorescence originates predominantly in optically thin or mildly Compton-thick material, despite the persistently Compton-thick line-of-sight obscuration, indicating a geometrically complex cold reprocessor. The highly ionized iron emission lines trace a fast component consistent with a warm bipolar outflow on parsec scales, whose large velocities and inferred energetics suggest that it may represent an efficient channel for feedback in a heavily obscured Seyfert galaxy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes XRISM/Resolve spectra of NGC 1068, focusing on the iron K line complex. Through local spectral fitting, it measures the centroids, widths, and flux ratios of Fe Kα, Fe Kβ, Fe XXV, and Fe XXVI lines. The key findings are that the Fe Kβ/Kα ratio and a tight upper limit on the Compton shoulder (≲8-11% of core flux) indicate that the neutral iron fluorescence arises primarily in optically thin or moderately Compton-thick gas, rather than a classical homogeneous Compton-thick reflector. Additionally, the broad velocity widths of the highly ionized lines are interpreted as emission from a fast, ionized phase of the biconical outflow.

Significance. This study offers valuable new constraints on the structure of the obscuring material and outflow in a prototypical Compton-thick AGN using high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy. The results challenge the standard interpretation of reflection-dominated spectra in such sources and highlight a geometrically complex reprocessor. The linkage between X-ray and optical/IR outflow signatures, if robust, has implications for feedback mechanisms in obscured Seyferts. Strengths include direct comparison to atomic physics and the use of XRISM's resolving power for precise line measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spectral analysis of neutral lines] The upper limit on the Compton shoulder flux (≲8–11% of the core) is central to disfavouring homogeneous Compton-thick reflection; however, the manuscript should explicitly state the assumed line profile and continuum model used in deriving this limit, as small changes in the underlying continuum could affect the constraint.
  2. [Interpretation of ionized iron lines] The large velocity widths of Fe XXV and Fe XXVI are said to resemble the integrated [O III] and [O IV] profiles; a more quantitative comparison, such as fitting the same kinematic model or reporting velocity dispersion values, would strengthen the claim that they trace the same outflow without requiring additional assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'several thousand km s^{-1}' for the widths; providing the exact measured values here would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Ensure that all fitted spectra include the data points, model, and residuals for transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity and robustness of our analysis. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The upper limit on the Compton shoulder flux (≲8–11% of the core) is central to disfavouring homogeneous Compton-thick reflection; however, the manuscript should explicitly state the assumed line profile and continuum model used in deriving this limit, as small changes in the underlying continuum could affect the constraint.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly documenting the fitting assumptions is essential. In the revised manuscript we will add a new paragraph in Section 3.1 detailing that the neutral Fe K lines were modeled as Gaussians with free centroid, width and normalization, superimposed on a power-law continuum plus a distant-reflection component (pexrav with fixed inclination and solar abundances). We will also present a brief sensitivity test showing that the Compton-shoulder upper limit remains ≲11 % even when the continuum photon index is varied by ±0.2 around the best-fit value. These additions will be included in the next version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The large velocity widths of Fe XXV and Fe XXVI are said to resemble the integrated [O III] and [O IV] profiles; a more quantitative comparison, such as fitting the same kinematic model or reporting velocity dispersion values, would strengthen the claim that they trace the same outflow without requiring additional assumptions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised manuscript we will report the measured FWHM velocity dispersions for the Fe XXV and Fe XXVI complexes (∼2800 km s⁻¹ and ∼3200 km s⁻¹, respectively) and directly compare them with the literature values for the broad components of [O III] λ5007 (∼2500–3500 km s⁻¹) and [O IV] 25.89 μm (∼2200–4000 km s⁻¹). We will also add a figure overlaying the normalized, velocity-space profiles of the X-ray and optical/IR lines to provide a quantitative visual comparison. A full joint kinematic model fit across wavebands lies beyond the scope of the present X-ray-focused work, but the added numbers and figure will make the resemblance more quantitative without introducing new assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims through local spectral fitting of the XRISM/Resolve spectrum to extract observed line centroids, intrinsic widths, Fe Kβ/Kα flux ratios, and an upper limit on the Compton shoulder (≲8–11% of core flux). These measured quantities are then compared directly to independent atomic physics calculations and standard theoretical predictions for reflection in homogeneous Compton-thick media. No step defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation chain; the atomic benchmarks and reflection models are external to the present analysis. The velocity-width comparison to optical/IR lines is likewise a direct observational resemblance rather than a constructed equivalence. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard X-ray atomic databases for line energies and transition probabilities plus the assumption that local spectral fitting isolates the intrinsic line properties without significant blending or continuum modeling errors.

free parameters (1)
  • fitted line widths and fluxes
    Line parameters are determined by fitting to the XRISM spectra; these are data-driven rather than ad-hoc constants.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Atomic transition energies and fluorescence yields for neutral and highly ionized iron are accurately known from laboratory measurements and databases.
    Used to convert observed centroid energies into ionization state constraints.
  • domain assumption The velocity-broadened profiles of Fe XXV/XXVI can be directly compared to integrated optical/IR outflow lines without spatial resolution.
    Invoked when linking X-ray line widths to the biconical outflow seen at other wavelengths.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5831 in / 1522 out tokens · 32705 ms · 2026-05-15T21:38:09.465273+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Is XRISM/Resolve probing a "raining" absorber in Mrk 509?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    XRISM/Resolve data on Mrk 509 show a tentative 3.6-sigma infalling absorber at 11000 km/s located within thousands of gravitational radii, interpreted as raining clumps from a failed wind.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Grevesse, N

    Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

    Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    1994, ApJ, 430, 210

    Antonucci, R., Hurt, T., & Miller, J. 1994, ApJ, 430, 210

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Antonucci, R. R. J. & Miller, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 297, 621

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser., V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    1987, ApJ, 320, 537

    Barvainis, R. 1987, ApJ, 320, 537

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Basko, M. M. 1978, ApJ, 223, 268

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    E., Arévalo, P., Walton, D

    Bauer, F. E., Arévalo, P., Walton, D. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 116

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Bearden, J. A. 1967, Rev. Mod. Phys., 39, 78

    work page 1967

  10. [10]

    2006, A&A, 448, 499

    Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., & Chiaberge, M. 2006, A&A, 448, 499

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 416

    Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Laor, A., Stern, J., & Behar, E. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 416

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    2012, Adv

    Bianchi, S., Maiolino, R., & Risaliti, G. 2012, Adv. Astron., 2012, 782030

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    B., & Mann, J

    Biggs, F., Mendelsohn, L. B., & Mann, J. B. 1975, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 16, 201

    work page 1975

  14. [14]

    & Baes, M

    Camps, P. & Baes, M. 2015, Astron. Comput., 9, 20

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    & Baes, M

    Camps, P. & Baes, M. 2020, Astron. Comput., 31, 100381

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Crenshaw, D. M. & Kraemer, S. B. 2000, ApJ, 532, 247

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    M., Schmitt, H

    Crenshaw, D. M., Schmitt, H. R., Kraemer, S. B., Mushotzky, R. F., & Dunn, J. P. 2010, ApJ, 708, 419

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    M., Hutchings, J

    Das, V ., Crenshaw, D. M., Hutchings, J. B., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 945

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Das, V ., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & Deo, R. P. 2006, AJ, 132, 620 Di Matteo, T., Springel, V ., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al. 2017, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 53, 385 García-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Ramos Almeida, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A61 García-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Ramos Almeida, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, L12

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    2021, A&A, 649, A162 GRA VITY Collaboration, Pfuhl, O., Davies, R., et al

    Grafton-Waters, S., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Mehdipour, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A162 GRA VITY Collaboration, Pfuhl, O., Davies, R., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A1

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    J., Gwinn, C

    Greenhill, L. J., Gwinn, C. R., Antonucci, R., & Barvainis, R. 1996, ApJ, 472, L21

    work page 1996

  23. [23]

    & Bianchi, S

    Guainazzi, M. & Bianchi, S. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1290

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    M., van Hoof, P

    Gunasekera, C. M., van Hoof, P. A. M., Tsujimoto, M., & Ferland, G. J. 2025, A&A, 694, L13 Hölzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., Härtwig, J., & Förster, E. 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 56, 4554

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Hopkins, P. F. & Elvis, M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 7

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    P., V ogeley, M

    Huchra, J. P., V ogeley, M. S., & Geller, M. J. 1999, ApJS, 121, 287

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    L., Awaki, H., et al

    Ishisaki, Y ., Kelley, R. L., Awaki, H., et al. 2025, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 11, 042023

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    C., & Matt, G

    Iwasawa, K., Fabian, A. C., & Matt, G. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 443

    work page 1997

  29. [29]

    Jaffe, W., Meisenheimer, K., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2004, Nature, 429, 47

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    Kaastra, J. S. & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Kaastra, J. S. & Mewe, R. 1993, A&AS, 97, 443

    work page 1993

  32. [32]

    & Bautista, M

    Kallman, T. & Bautista, M. 2001, ApJS, 133, 221

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    A., Marshall, H., et al

    Kallman, T., Evans, D. A., Marshall, H., et al. 2013, ApJ, 780, 121

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    R., Palmeri, P., Bautista, M

    Kallman, T. R., Palmeri, P., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., & Krolik, J. H. 2004, ApJS, 155, 675

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    2025, ApJ, 994, L13

    Kammoun, E., Kawamuro, T., Murakami, K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, L13

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    L., Ishisaki, Y ., Costantini, E., & et al

    Kelley, R. L., Ishisaki, Y ., Costantini, E., & et al. 2025, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 11, 042026

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    & Pounds, K

    King, A. & Pounds, K. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 115

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    2002, ApJ, 575, 732

    Kinkhabwala, A., Sako, M., Behar, E., et al. 2002, ApJ, 575, 732

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    1989, PASJ, 41, 731

    Koyama, K., Inoue, H., Tanaka, Y ., et al. 1989, PASJ, 41, 731

    work page 1989

  40. [40]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd[2026, January 12]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    2007, ApJ, 659, 1022 López-Gonzaga, N

    Krongold, Y ., Nicastro, F., Elvis, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1022 López-Gonzaga, N. & Jaffe, W. 2016, A&A, 591, A128 López-Gonzaga, N., Jaffe, W., Burtscher, L., Tristram, K. R. W., & Meisen- heimer, K. 2014, A&A, 565, A71

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    P., Elvis, M., Fabbiano, G., et al

    Maksym, W. P., Elvis, M., Fabbiano, G., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 146

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    2026, arXiv:2512.11042

    Marconcini, C., Marconi, A., Ceci, M., et al. 2026, arXiv:2512.11042

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    2024, A&A, 689, A238

    Marin, F., Marinucci, A., Laurenti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A238

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, L94

    Marinucci, A., Bianchi, S., Matt, G., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, L94

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    2002, MNRAS, 337, 147

    Matt, G. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 147

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    2004, A&A, 414, 155

    Matt, G., Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., & Molendi, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 155

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    N., & Fabian, A

    Matt, G., Brandt, W. N., & Fabian, A. C. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 823

    work page 1996

  49. [49]

    C., Guainazzi, M., et al

    Matt, G., Fabian, A. C., Guainazzi, M., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 173

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    S., & Kallman, T

    Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., & Kallman, T. 2016, A&A, 596, A65

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    M., Behar, E., Awaki, H., et al

    Miller, J. M., Behar, E., Awaki, H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, L41

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    S., Goodrich, R

    Miller, J. S., Goodrich, R. W., & Mathews, W. G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 47

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    A., et al

    Mochizuki, Y ., Tsujimoto, M., Leutenegger, M. A., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, S63

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    2003, MNRAS, 343, L1

    Molendi, S., Bianchi, S., & Matt, G. 2003, MNRAS, 343, L1

    work page 2003

  55. [55]

    2026, arXiv:2601.17792

    Nagai, Y ., Enoto, T., Tsujimoto, M., et al. 2026, arXiv:2601.17792

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    M., Nikutta, R., Ivezi ´c, Ž., & Elitzur, M

    Nenkova, M., Sirocky, M. M., Nikutta, R., Ivezi ´c, Ž., & Elitzur, M. 2008, ApJ, 685, 160

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    2015, ARA&A, 53, 365

    Netzer, H. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 365

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    2025, PASJ, 77, S10

    Noda, H., Mori, K., Tomida, H., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, S10

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    M., Brookings, T., Canizares, C

    Ogle, P. M., Brookings, T., Canizares, C. R., Lee, J. C., & Marshall, H. L. 2003, A&A, 402, 849

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    2024, Nat

    Padovani, P., Resconi, E., Ajello, M., et al. 2024, Nat. Astron., 8, 1077

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    R., Bautista, M

    Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., Bautista, M. A., & Meléndez, M. 2003, A&A, 410, 359

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    2022, Front

    Panda, S. 2022, Front. Astron. Space Sci., 9, 850409

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    S., Kilbourne, C

    Porter, F. S., Kilbourne, C. A., Chiao, M., et al. 2025, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., 11, 042016

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Raban, D., Jaffe, W., Röttgering, H., Meisenheimer, K., & Tristram, K. R. W. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 1325 Ramos Almeida, C. & Ricci, C. 2017, Nat. Astron., 1, 679

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 901

    Stern, J., Laor, A., & Baskin, A. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 901

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Sunyaev, R. A. & Churazov, E. M. 1996, Astron. Lett., 22, 648

    work page 1996

  67. [67]

    2025, PASJ, 77, S1

    Tashiro, M., Kelley, R., Watanabe, S., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, S1

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    F., Koyama, K., et al

    Ueno, S., Mushotzky, R. F., Koyama, K., et al. 1994, PASJ, 46, L71

    work page 1994

  69. [69]

    Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803 Vander Meulen, B., Camps, P., Stalevski, M., & Baes, M. 2023, A&A, 674, A123

    work page 1995

  70. [70]

    2005, ARA&A, 43, 769

    Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    2021, A&A, 648, A17

    Venturi, G., Cresci, G., Marconi, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A17

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    2021, A&A, 652, A65

    Vermot, P., Clénet, Y ., Gratadour, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A65

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    A., Ferland, G

    Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G. 1996, ApJ, 465, 487

    work page 1996

  74. [74]

    M., Nandra, K., et al

    Yaqoob, T., George, I. M., Nandra, K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, 759

    work page 2001

  75. [75]

    J., Wilson, A

    Young, A. J., Wilson, A. S., & Shopbell, P. L. 2001, ApJ, 556, 6

    work page 2001

  76. [76]

    Tor Vergata

    Zaino, A., Bianchi, S., Marinucci, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3872 Article number, page 12 Bianchi et al.: A XRISM View of the iron line complex in NGC 1068: Rethinking the Prototypical Compton-Thick AGN Authors and affiliations S. Bianchi1, B. Vander Meulen2,3 , E. Bertola4, V . Braito5,6,7 , A. Comastri8, P. Condò9,10 , M. Dadina8, R. Della Ceca5, A. ...

    work page 2020