pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.17514 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-19 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR· physics.space-ph

Kinetic Route to Helicity-Constrained Decay

Dion Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords magnetic helicityplasma turbulencekinetic decaySaffman integralsPIC simulationshelicity density2D decay constraintsub-ion turbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A source-compensated history-dependent helicity density satisfies an exact local balance identity and produces time-independent Saffman plateaus in kinetic plasma decay.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a new helicity density for magnetic fields in freely decaying sub-ion turbulence to address limitations of standard fixed-gauge diagnostics. This density is constructed to obey an exact local balance law, which in turn permits two-point Saffman integrals whose intermediate-scale plateaus remain approximately constant in time under ordinary flux-decorrelation assumptions. Two-dimensional three-velocity particle-in-cell simulations show these plateaus staying steady through the early kinetic stage even while the conventional helicity variance changes. The plateau invariance matches the scaling expected for two-dimensional decay, in which the product of magnetic-field strength and length scale stays constant, and for net-helical initial conditions the global helicity decays through cancellation of mixed-sign patches.

Core claim

Through 2D3V PIC simulations of freely decaying sub-ion turbulence, intermittent localized regions with E·B ≠ 0 are statistically associated with decreases in the fixed-gauge structure-integrated magnetic-helicity diagnostic and with a decline of the Saffman helicity-variance plateau value IH. Motivated by these observations, the authors define a source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density that satisfies an exact local balance identity by construction. This definition enables Saffman-type two-point correlation integrals that, under standard flux-decorrelation assumptions, exhibit intermediate-scale plateaus that remain roughly time-independent. In the simulations these plateaus do

What carries the argument

The source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density, constructed to satisfy an exact local balance identity and thereby support time-independent Saffman correlation plateaus.

If this is right

  • Saffman-type integrals built from the new density develop roughly time-independent plateaus at intermediate scales.
  • Under single-scale self-similarity the plateau behavior reproduces the two-dimensional decay constraint BL ~ const.
  • Initially net-helical configurations rapidly form mixed-sign helicity patches, lowering the global fractional helicity.
  • The observed decay over the kinetic interval follows the cancellation-dominated scaling rather than a purely helical cascade.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The compensated density may be useful for tracking helicity evolution in other plasma regimes where local sources or sinks appear, such as driven turbulence or reconnection layers.
  • Extension to fully three-dimensional geometries would test whether the plateau invariance survives the additional degrees of freedom.
  • The approach could clarify how kinetic-scale dissipation couples to large-scale magnetic structure preservation in astrophysical plasmas.
  • Similar compensation constructions might be applied to other quadratic invariants whose local conservation is broken by non-ideal terms.

Load-bearing premise

Standard flux-decorrelation assumptions together with approximate single-scale self-similarity link the observed plateau invariance to the two-dimensional decay constraint BL constant and to cancellation-dominated scaling.

What would settle it

If the intermediate-scale plateaus of the proposed Saffman integrals vary substantially over the measured kinetic interval instead of remaining approximately invariant, the connection between the new helicity density and the two-dimensional decay constraint would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17514 by Dion Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Numerical evidence of Eqs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Representation of the structure-by-structure helicity sign alignment in our 2D3V PIC simulations. Each panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Demonstration of the approximate invariance of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: should also show this to be the case in our ini￾tially net-helical simulations. We explore this point of contention in the following section. IV. INITIALLY NET-HELICAL FIELD Let us now consider an initially net-helical configura￾tion as a useful contrasting case for the scaling arguments leading to the BL ∼ const constraint. Since L1 provides a conserved diagnostic and scales as ∼ B2L up to order￾unity, ev… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Demonstration of the tendency towards zero global fractional helicity for initially net-helical configurations in both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Histograms over sampled output times of the domain-averaged ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Through 2D3V PIC simulations of freely decaying sub-ion turbulence, intermittent localized regions with $\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{B} \neq 0$ are found, in the early electron-scale interaction phase, to be statistically associated with decreases in $|H_{V_s}|$, the fixed-gauge structure-integrated magnetic-helicity diagnostic. This structure-level behavior coincides with a decline of the Saffman helicity-variance plateau value $I_H$. Motivated by these observations, we propose a source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density that satisfies an exact local balance identity by construction, enabling Saffman-type two-point correlation integrals which, under standard flux-decorrelation assumptions, can exhibit intermediate-scale plateaus that are roughly time-independent. In the simulations, such plateaus are observed to remain approximately invariant over the measured kinetic interval even as $I_H$ evolves during the early kinetic stage. Under approximate single-scale self-similarity, the plateau behavior of the magnetic integral is consistent with the 2D decay constraint $BL \sim \text{const}$. For initially net-helical configurations, we observe rapid development of mixed-signed magnetic-helicity patches and a decrease of the global fractional helicity, such that the decay over the kinetic interval is again most consistent with the cancellation-dominated scaling constraint.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 2D3V PIC simulations of freely decaying sub-ion turbulence in which intermittent regions with E·B ≠ 0 are statistically linked to decreases in the fixed-gauge helicity diagnostic |H_Vs| and the Saffman helicity-variance integral I_H. Motivated by these observations, the authors introduce a source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density constructed to satisfy an exact local balance identity. Saffman-type two-point correlation integrals of this density are shown to develop intermediate-scale plateaus that remain approximately time-independent in the simulations. Under standard flux-decorrelation and approximate single-scale self-similarity assumptions, this plateau invariance is argued to be consistent with the 2D decay constraint BL ∼ const; for initially net-helical cases the simulations additionally exhibit mixed-sign helicity patches and a decline in global fractional helicity consistent with cancellation-dominated scaling.

Significance. If the flux-decorrelation and self-similarity assumptions can be substantiated in the kinetic regime, the work supplies a concrete kinetic mechanism that extends Saffman-type helicity constraints beyond MHD, with potential relevance to decay laws in space and laboratory plasmas. The construction of a helicity density obeying an exact local identity by design is a clear technical strength, and the direct comparison of the resulting integrals against simulation data provides a falsifiable test of the proposed route.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of plateau behavior and 2D decay constraint] In the section linking the observed plateau invariance to the 2D decay constraint BL ∼ const: the argument rests on standard flux-decorrelation assumptions and approximate single-scale self-similarity, yet no verification or sensitivity test of these assumptions is provided for the sub-ion kinetic regime where the simulations operate. If decorrelation times become comparable to the evolution time of the integral, plateau constancy does not enforce the claimed scaling.
  2. [Proposal of the helicity density and Saffman integrals] In the presentation of the source-compensated helicity density: while the exact local balance identity holds by construction, the subsequent claim that the resulting Saffman integrals exhibit time-independent plateaus is tested only against the specific simulation data; the manuscript does not explore how sensitive the plateau invariance is to the precise form of the compensation term or to variations in initial conditions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Definition of the helicity density] Notation for the new helicity density and its relation to the conventional H_Vs should be introduced with an explicit equation number to avoid ambiguity when the integrals are later defined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the technical strengths of the helicity-density construction and its comparison to simulation data. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the discussion of assumptions and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the section linking the observed plateau invariance to the 2D decay constraint: the argument rests on standard flux-decorrelation assumptions and approximate single-scale self-similarity, yet no verification or sensitivity test of these assumptions is provided for the sub-ion kinetic regime where the simulations operate. If decorrelation times become comparable to the evolution time of the integral, plateau constancy does not enforce the claimed scaling.

    Authors: We agree that direct verification of the flux-decorrelation assumption in the sub-ion regime would strengthen the link to the BL ∼ const scaling. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph that estimates decorrelation times from the measured two-point correlation functions and the sub-ion spectral slopes. These estimates remain shorter than the observed evolution time of the Saffman integrals throughout the kinetic interval, providing indirect support for the assumptions within the simulated parameter range. We also emphasize that the empirical invariance of the plateau while I_H continues to evolve is itself consistent with the scaling under the stated approximations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the presentation of the source-compensated helicity density: while the exact local balance identity holds by construction, the subsequent claim that the resulting Saffman integrals exhibit time-independent plateaus is tested only against the specific simulation data; the manuscript does not explore how sensitive the plateau invariance is to the precise form of the compensation term or to variations in initial conditions.

    Authors: The compensation term is fixed by the requirement that the helicity density obey the exact local balance identity obtained from the induction equation; any other choice would violate this identity. To address sensitivity to initial conditions we have performed an additional analysis on a zero-net-helicity run and confirmed that the intermediate-scale plateaus remain approximately time-independent. This result and a short clarifying statement on the uniqueness of the compensation have been incorporated into the revised text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Helicity density defined by construction to satisfy local balance identity; plateau invariance observed independently in simulations

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "we propose a source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density that satisfies an exact local balance identity by construction, enabling Saffman-type two-point correlation integrals which, under standard flux-decorrelation assumptions, can exhibit intermediate-scale plateaus that are roughly time-independent."

    The helicity density is introduced specifically so that it satisfies the exact local balance identity by construction. This makes the balance satisfaction a definitional feature of the proposed quantity rather than a result derived from the underlying plasma equations or dynamics.

full rationale

The paper explicitly constructs a source-compensated helicity density to satisfy an exact local balance identity by construction. This matches the self-definitional pattern at the proposal step. However, the subsequent claims of time-independent plateaus and consistency with the BL ~ const decay constraint rest on independent PIC simulation observations plus explicitly stated flux-decorrelation and self-similarity assumptions, rather than reducing tautologically to the definition. No self-citation load-bearing steps, fitted-input predictions, or ansatz smuggling are identified. The central empirical content therefore remains independent of the definitional choice.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the newly defined helicity density, the flux-decorrelation assumption needed for plateau formation, and single-scale self-similarity used to recover the BL ~ const scaling; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard flux-decorrelation assumptions
    Invoked to allow Saffman-type integrals to develop time-independent intermediate-scale plateaus.
  • domain assumption Approximate single-scale self-similarity
    Used to connect plateau behavior to the 2D decay constraint BL ~ const.
invented entities (1)
  • source-compensated, history-dependent helicity density no independent evidence
    purpose: To satisfy an exact local balance identity and enable time-independent Saffman plateaus in kinetic turbulence
    Introduced by construction in the paper to address the observed decline in the original I_H diagnostic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1540 out tokens · 31374 ms · 2026-05-15T20:37:09.229331+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    canonical helicity

    =I H(t= 0)(=I Le (t= 0)for initially zero flow), derived in Appendix B. Also included are the power-law scalings:∝t−0.87 form i/me = 25and∝t −0.89 form i/me ≈1836(dash-dotted black, fitted using theB 4 rms data) and∝t 0 (dashed black). The insets zoom in on the vertical axis range∈[1/2,2]×16/9. structures inherit a comparatively narrow distribution of exc...

    work page

  2. [2]

    relative canonical helicity

    explicitly frames the “relative canonical helicity” as a gauge-invariant quantity when canonical vorticity flux crosses boundaries, and argues that while species helici- ties can exchange, the total relative canonical helicity is globally invariant in that idealized framework. However, inthefullykineticVlasov-Maxwellsetting, thereisgener- ally no reason f...

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    B18 into Eq

    Sd−1 (2π)d A2e2ka−1 c ×2−(a+9)/2Γ a−1 2 .(B17) With⟨|B| 2⟩Vsys =B 2 rms, then, with our convention |Bk|2 =F(k), B2 rms,0 = 1 4 Sd−1 (2π)d Z ∞ 0 dk k d−1F0(k) = 1 8 Sd−1 (2π)d ×Aek(a+d+1)/2 c Γ a+d+ 1 4 .(B18) Substituting Eq. B18 into Eq. B17 yields IH(t= 0)≃(1−σ 2 0)(2π)d Sd−1 B4 rms,0k−(d+2) c ×2−(a−3)/2 Γ( a−1 2 ) Γ2( a+d+1 4 ) .(B19) Equation B19 give...

    work page

  4. [4]

    4 and 5 as the black dotted lines

    [(mec2/e)4] = 16/9, which we use as a reference value for comparison in Figs. 4 and 5 as the black dotted lines. For the finite-Mthin-ring initialization used in the sim- ulations, Eq. B19 should be interpreted as an isotropic- continuum reference estimate. The corresponding dis- crete expression is obtained by replacing the continuum integrals with sums ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Component decomposition and fluid-limit reductions We decomposeL ι into four separate source- compensated componentsL ι,l, withl∈ {1,2,3,4}, that obey their own respective continuity-type equations anal- ogous to Eq. 32, ∂tLι,l +∇ ·F ι,l = 0,(D1) with (Lι,∇ ·F ι) = 4X l=1 (Lι,l,∇ ·F ι,l),(D2) and it is straightforward to verify that this is satisfied with...

    work page

  6. [6]

    For the magnetic com- ponent, the time-integrated source term2c R t t0 dt′ E·B is gauge invariant, soδχL1 =δ χ(A·B) = (∇χ)·B= ∇ ·(χB), where∇ ·B= 0

    Gauge properties It is worthwhile to check whetherL ι andL ι,l are gauge-invariant under the transformationsA→A ′ = A+∇χandcφ→cφ ′ =cφ−∂ tχ. For the magnetic com- ponent, the time-integrated source term2c R t t0 dt′ E·B is gauge invariant, soδχL1 =δ χ(A·B) = (∇χ)·B= ∇ ·(χB), where∇ ·B= 0. One obtains Z V ddx δ χLι = I ∂V χΩΩΩι ·dS,(D7a) Z V ddx δ χL1 = I ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    W. M. Elsasser, Hydromagnetic dynamo theory, Re- views of Modern Physics28, 135–163 (1956)

    work page 1956

  8. [8]

    Woltjer, A theorem on force-free magnetic fields, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences44, 489–491 (1958)

    L. Woltjer, A theorem on force-free magnetic fields, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences44, 489–491 (1958)

    work page 1958

  9. [9]

    M.A.BergerandG.B.Field,Thetopologicalproperties of magnetic helicity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics147, 133–148 (1984)

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    A.H.Boozer,Helicitycontentandtokamakapplications of helicity, The Physics of Fluids29, 4123–4130 (1986)

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    V. I. Arnold and B. A. Khesin,Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics(Springer International Publishing, 2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    H. K. Moffatt, The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines, Journal of Fluid Mechanics35, 117–129 (1969)

    work page 1969

  13. [13]

    Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences439, 411–429 (1992)

    H.K.MoffattandR.L.Ricca,Helicityandthecălugăre- anu invariant, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences439, 411–429 (1992)

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    J. B. Taylor, Relaxation of toroidal plasma and genera- tion of reverse magnetic fields, Physical Review Letters 33, 1139–1141 (1974)

    work page 1974

  15. [15]

    J. B. Taylor, Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas, Reviews of Modern Physics58, 741–763 (1986)

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    H. Ji, S. C. Prager, and J. S. Sarff, Conservation of mag- netic helicity during plasma relaxation, Physical Review Letters74, 2945–2948 (1995)

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    H. Y. Guo, A. L. Hoffman, K. E. Miller, and L. C. Steinhauer, Flux conversion and evidence of relaxation in a high-βplasma formed by high-speed injection into a mirror confinement structure, Physical Review Letters 92, 10.1103/physrevlett.92.245001 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.245001 2004

  18. [18]

    E. G. Blackman, Magnetic helicity and large scale mag- netic fields: A primer, inMulti-scale Structure Forma- tion and Dynamics in Cosmic Plasmas(Springer New York, 2016) p. 59–91

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Frisch, A

    U. Frisch, A. Pouquet, J. LÉOrat, and A. Mazure, Pos- sibility of an inverse cascade of magnetic helicity in magnetohydrodynamicturbulence,JournalofFluidMe- chanics68, 769–778 (1975)

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    Biskamp and W.-C

    D. Biskamp and W.-C. Müller, Decay laws for three- dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Physi- cal Review Letters83, 2195–2198 (1999)

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    Müller and D

    W.-C. Müller and D. Biskamp, Scaling properties of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Physical Review Letters84, 475–478 (2000)

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Christensson, M

    M. Christensson, M. Hindmarsh, and A. Brandenburg, Inverse cascade in decaying three-dimensional magne- tohydrodynamic turbulence, Physical Review E64, 10.1103/physreve.64.056405 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64.056405 2001

  23. [23]

    Alexakis, P

    A. Alexakis, P. D. Mininni, and A. Pouquet, On the inverse cascade of magnetic helicity, The Astrophysical Journal640, 335–343 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Pouquet, D

    A. Pouquet, D. Rosenberg, J. Stawarz, and R. Marino, Helicity dynamics, inverse, and bidirectional cascades in fluid and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: A brief review, Earth and Space Science6, 351–369 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    W. H. Matthaeus and D. Montgomery, Selective decay hypothesis at high mechanical and magnetic reynolds numbers, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 357, 203–222 (1980)

    work page 1980

  26. [26]

    Stribling, W

    T. Stribling, W. H. Matthaeus, and S. Oughton, Mag- netic helicity in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence with a mean magnetic field, Physics of Plasmas2, 1437–1452 (1995)

    work page 1995

  27. [27]

    Banerjee and K

    R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik, Evolution of cosmic magnetic fields: From the very early universe, to re- combination, to the present, Physical Review D70, 10.1103/physrevd.70.123003 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123003 2004

  28. [28]

    Durrer and A

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evolution and observa- tion, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review21, 10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 2013

  29. [29]

    Subramanian, The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 076901 (2016)

    K. Subramanian, The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 076901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    G. B. Field and S. M. Carroll, Cosmological magnetic fields from primordial helicity, Physical Review D62, 10.1103/physrevd.62.103008 (2000)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.103008 2000

  31. [31]

    Caprini and L

    C. Caprini and L. Sorbo, Adding helicity to inflationary magnetogenesis, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics2014(10), 056–056

    work page

  32. [32]

    D. N. Hosking and A. A. Schekochihin, Reconnection- controlled decay of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and the role of invariants, Physical Review X11, 10.1103/physrevx.11.041005 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041005 2021

  33. [33]

    H. Zhou, R. Sharma, and A. Brandenburg, Scal- ing of the hosking integral in decaying magnetically dominated turbulence, Journal of Plasma Physics88, 10.1017/s002237782200109x (2022)

    work page doi:10.1017/s002237782200109x 2022

  34. [34]

    Brandenburg and A

    A. Brandenburg and A. Banerjee, Turbulent magnetic decay controlled by two conserved quantities, Journal of Plasma Physics91, 10.1017/s0022377824001508 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377824001508 2025

  35. [35]

    K.J.Hew, D.N.Hosking, C.Federrath, J.R.Beattie, and N

    J. K.J.Hew, D.N.Hosking, C.Federrath, J.R.Beattie, and N. Kriel, Conservation of magnetic-helicity fluctu- ations due to spatial decorrelation of fluxes in decaying mhd turbulence (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Brandenburg and G

    A. Brandenburg and G. Larsson, Turbulence with mag- netic helicity that is absent on average, Atmosphere14, 932 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [38]

    D. N. Hosking and A. A. Schekochihin, Cosmic-void ob- servations reconciled with primordial magnetogenesis, NatureCommunications14,10.1038/s41467-023-43258- 3 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43258- 2023

  38. [39]

    Yamada, R

    M. Yamada, R. Kulsrud, and H. Ji, Magnetic reconnec- tion, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 603–664 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [40]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , keywords =

    R. Bruno and V. Carbone, The solar wind as a turbu- lence laboratory, Living Reviews in Solar Physics10, 10.12942/lrsp-2013-2 (2013)

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-2 2013

  40. [41]

    Alexandrova, C

    O. Alexandrova, C. H. K. Chen, L. Sorriso-Valvo, T. S. Horbury, and S. D. Bale, Solar wind turbulence and the role of ion instabilities, Space Science Reviews178, 101–139 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [42]

    G., & Maruca, B

    D. Verscharen, K. G. Klein, and B. A. Maruca, The multi-scale nature of the solar wind, Living Reviews in Solar Physics16, 10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 2019

  42. [43]

    Sahraoui, L

    F. Sahraoui, L. Hadid, and S. Huang, Magnetohydro- dynamic and kinetic scale turbulence in the near-earth space plasmas: a (short) biased review, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics4, 10.1007/s41614-020-0040-2 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/s41614-020-0040-2 2020

  43. [44]

    J. M. Finn and T. M. Antonsen, Jr, Magnetic helicity: what is it and what is it good for (1985)

    work page 1985

  44. [45]

    Schindler, M

    K. Schindler, M. Hesse, and J. Birn, General mag- netic reconnection, parallel electric fields, and helicity, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics93, 5547–5557 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [46]

    H. Ji, M. Yamada, S. Hsu, and R. Kulsrud, Experimen- tal test of the sweet-parker model of magnetic reconnec- tion, Physical Review Letters80, 3256–3259 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [47]

    Priest and T

    E. Priest and T. Forbes,Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications(Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [48]

    Biskamp,Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas(Cam- bridge University Press, 2000)

    D. Biskamp,Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas(Cam- bridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  48. [49]

    V. M. Vasyliunas, Theoretical models of magnetic field linemerging,ReviewsofGeophysics13,303–336(1975)

    work page 1975

  49. [50]

    Biskamp, E

    D. Biskamp, E. Schwarz, and J. F. Drake, Two-fluid theory of collisionless magnetic reconnection, Physics of Plasmas4, 1002–1009 (1997)

    work page 1997

  50. [51]

    M. A. Shay, J. F. Drake, B. N. Rogers, and R. E. Den- ton, Alfvénic collisionless magnetic reconnection and the hall term, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics106, 3759–3772 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [52]

    Y. V. Khotyaintsev, D. B. Graham, C. Norgren, and A. Vaivads, Collisionless magnetic reconnection and waves: Progress review, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences6, 10.3389/fspas.2019.00070 (2019)

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00070 2019

  52. [53]

    Y.-H. Liu, M. Hesse, K. Genestreti, R. Nakamura, J. L. Burch, P. A. Cassak, N. Bessho, J. P. Eastwood, T. Phan, M. Swisdak, S. Toledo-Redondo, M. Hoshino, C. Norgren, H. Ji, and T. K. M. Nakamura, Ohm’s law, the reconnection rate, and energy conversion in colli- sionless magnetic reconnection, Space Science Reviews 221, 10.1007/s11214-025-01142-0 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-025-01142-0 2025

  53. [54]

    E. G. Zweibel and M. Yamada, Magnetic reconnection inastrophysicalandlaboratoryplasmas,AnnualReview of Astronomy and Astrophysics47, 291–332 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [55]

    M. Wan, W. H. Matthaeus, H. Karimabadi, V. Royter- shteyn, M. Shay, P. Wu, W. Daughton, B. Loring, and S. C. Chapman, Intermittent dissipation at ki- netic scales in collisionless plasma turbulence, Physi- calReview Letters109, 10.1103/physrevlett.109.195001 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.195001 2012

  55. [57]

    J. M. TenBarge and G. G. Howes, Current sheets and collisionless damping in kinetic plasma turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal771, L27 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [58]

    C. C. Haggerty, T. N. Parashar, W. H. Matthaeus, M. A. Shay, Y. Yang, M. Wan, P. Wu, and S. Ser- vidio, Exploring the statistics of magnetic reconnection x-points in kinetic particle-in-cell turbulence, Physics of Plasmas24, 10.1063/1.5001722 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5001722 2017

  57. [60]

    Servidio, K

    S. Servidio, K. T. Osman, F. Valentini, D. Perrone, F. Califano, S. Chapman, W. H. Matthaeus, and P. Vel- tri, Proton kinetic effects in vlasov and solar wind tur- bulence, The Astrophysical Journal781, L27 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [61]

    Franci, S

    L. Franci, S. Landi, L. Matteini, A. Verdini, and P. Hellinger, High-resolution hybrid simulations of ki- netic plasma turbulence at proton scales, The Astro- physical Journal812, 21 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [62]

    Franci, S

    L. Franci, S. Landi, A. Verdini, L. Matteini, and P. Hellinger, Solar wind turbulent cascade from mhd to sub-ion scales: Large-size 3d hybrid particle-in-cell simulations, The Astrophysical Journal853, 26 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [63]

    Sorriso-Valvo, D

    L. Sorriso-Valvo, D. Perrone, O. Pezzi, F. Valentini, S. Servidio, I. Zouganelis, and P. Veltri, Local energy transfer rate and kinetic processes: the fate of turbu- lent energy in two-dimensional hybrid vlasov–maxwell numerical simulations, Journal of Plasma Physics84, 10.1017/s0022377818000302 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377818000302 2018

  61. [65]

    K. T. Osman, W. H. Matthaeus, J. T. Gosling, A. Greco, S. Servidio, B. Hnat, S. C. Chapman, and T. D. Phan, Magnetic reconnection and intermittent turbulence in the solar wind, Physical Review Letters 112, 10.1103/physrevlett.112.215002 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.215002 2014

  62. [66]

    Chasapis, A

    A. Chasapis, A. Retinò, F. Sahraoui, A. Vaivads, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, D. Sundkvist, A. Greco, L. Sorriso-Valvo, and P. Canu, Thin current sheets and associated elec- tron heating in turbulent space plasma, The Astrophys- ical Journal804, L1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [67]

    Chasapis, Y

    A. Chasapis, Y. Yang, W. H. Matthaeus, T. N. Parashar, C. C. Haggerty, J. L. Burch, T. E. Moore, C. J. Pollock, J. Dorelli, D. J. Gershman, R. B. Tor- bert, and C. T. Russell, Energy conversion and collision- less plasma dissipation channels in the turbulent mag- netosheath observed by the magnetospheric multiscale mission, The Astrophysical Journal862, 32 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [68]

    Vörös, E

    Z. Vörös, E. Yordanova, A. Varsani, K. J. Genestreti, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, W. Li, D. B. Graham, C. Nor- gren, R. Nakamura, Y. Narita, F. Plaschke, W. Magnes, W. Baumjohann, D. Fischer, A. Vaivads, E. Eriksson, P. Lindqvist, G. Marklund, R. E. Ergun, M. Leitner, M. P. Leubner, R. J. Strangeway, O. Le Contel, C. Pol- 22 lock, B. J. Giles, R. B. Torbert, J. L...

    work page doi:10.1002/2017ja024535 2017

  65. [70]

    Yordanova, Z

    E. Yordanova, Z. Vörös, A. Varsani, D. B. Gra- ham, C. Norgren, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, A. Vaivads, E. Eriksson, R. Nakamura, P. Lindqvist, G. Marklund, R. E. Ergun, W. Magnes, W. Baumjohann, D. Fischer, F. Plaschke, Y. Narita, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, O.LeContel, C.Pollock, R.B.Torbert, B.J.Giles, J.L. Burch, L. A. Avanov, J. C. Dorelli, D. J. Gershm...

    work page 2016

  66. [71]

    T. D. Phan, J. P. Eastwood, M. A. Shay, J. F. Drake, B. U. O. Sonnerup, M. Fujimoto, P. A. Cas- sak, M. Øieroset, J. L. Burch, R. B. Torbert, A. C. Rager, J. C. Dorelli, D. J. Gershman, C. Pollock, P. S. Pyakurel, C. C. Haggerty, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, Y. Saito, M. Oka, R. E. Ergun, A. Retino, O. Le Contel, M. R. Argall, B. L. Giles, T. E. Moore, F....

    work page 2018

  67. [72]

    J. E. Stawarz, J. P. Eastwood, T. D. Phan, I. L. Gin- gell, M. A. Shay, J. L. Burch, R. E. Ergun, B. L. Giles, D. J. Gershman, O. L. Contel, P.-A. Lindqvist, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, R. B. Torbert, M. R. Argall, D. Fischer, W. Magnes, and L. Franci, Properties of the turbulence associated with electron-only magnetic reconnection in earth’s magneto...

    work page 2019

  68. [73]

    Sharma Pyakurel, M

    P. Sharma Pyakurel, M. A. Shay, T. D. Phan, W. H. Matthaeus, J. F. Drake, J. M. TenBarge, C. C. Hag- gerty, K. G. Klein, P. A. Cassak, T. N. Parashar, M. Swisdak, and A. Chasapis, Transition from ion- coupled to electron-only reconnection: Basic physics and implications for plasma turbulence, Physics of Plas- mas26, 10.1063/1.5090403 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5090403 2019

  69. [74]

    C. Vega, V. Roytershteyn, G. L. Delzanno, and S. Boldyrev, Electron-only reconnection in kinetic- alfvén turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 893, L10 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [75]

    Mallet, The onset of electron-only re- connection, Journal of Plasma Physics86, 10.1017/s0022377819000941 (2020)

    A. Mallet, The onset of electron-only re- connection, Journal of Plasma Physics86, 10.1017/s0022377819000941 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377819000941 2020

  71. [76]

    Califano, S

    F. Califano, S. S. Cerri, M. Faganello, D. Laveder, M. Sisti, and M. W. Kunz, Electron-only reconnec- tion in plasma turbulence, Frontiers in Physics8, 10.3389/fphy.2020.00317 (2020)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00317 2020

  72. [78]

    H. R. Strauss, Nonlinear, three-dimensional magneto- hydrodynamics of noncircular tokamaks, The Physics of Fluids19, 134–140 (1976)

    work page 1976

  73. [79]

    For the diagnostics used here,Ais reconstructed in pe- riodic Coulomb gauge fromB; details are given in Ap- pendix A

    work page

  74. [80]

    R. A. Treumann and W. Baumjohann, Collisionless magnetic reconnection in space plasmas, Frontiers in Physics1, 10.3389/fphy.2013.00031 (2013)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2013.00031 2013

  75. [81]

    5 is used to identify the kinetic terms supportingE′, not as the numerical prescription for computing it

    In the numerical diagnostics, we evaluateE ′ directly from the simulation fields asE′ =E+u e ×B/c; Eq. 5 is used to identify the kinetic terms supportingE′, not as the numerical prescription for computing it

    work page

  76. [82]

    Seehafer, Electric current helicity in the solar atmo- sphere, Solar Physics125, 219–232 (1990)

    N. Seehafer, Electric current helicity in the solar atmo- sphere, Solar Physics125, 219–232 (1990)

    work page 1990

  77. [83]

    Hagino and T

    M. Hagino and T. Sakurai, Latitude variation of helicity in solar active regions, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan56, 831–843 (2004)

    work page 2004

  78. [84]

    A. A. Pevtsov, M. A. Berger, A. Nindos, A. A. Norton, and L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, Magnetic helicity, tilt, and twist, Space Science Reviews186, 285–324 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [85]

    Wiegelmann and T

    T. Wiegelmann and T. Sakurai, Solar force-free mag- netic fields, Living Reviews in Solar Physics9, 10.12942/lrsp-2012-5 (2012)

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2012-5 2012

  80. [86]

    Wang, and C

    S. Zenitani, M. Hesse, A. Klimas, and M. Kuznetsova, New measure of the dissipation region in collisionless magnetic reconnection, Physical Review Letters106, 10.1103/physrevlett.106.195003 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.195003 2011

Showing first 80 references.