Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 64 references

A unified duality framework for barotropic, quantum and Korteweg fluids

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three fluid models—barotropic Euler, quantum Euler, Euler–Korteweg—share one dual variational framework, giving dual solutions, no duality gap, and an entropy-rate rule against early dissipation.

desk verdict A genuinely useful extension of Brenier duality to non-Orlicz fluid entropies, with a coherent core; the Euler-Korteweg application currently rests on an unproven equivalence and the abstract overstates the no-duality-gap result. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.18917 v4 pith:ZU7YET2Q submitted 2026-02-21 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MPmath.OC

Dmitry Vorotnikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.FAmath.MPmath.OC MSC 35Q3537K5849Q9976N10
keywords dualvariationalformulationcompressibleEulersystemquantumhydrodynamicsEuler–KortewegentropydissipationprinciplefiniteRadonmeasuresnodualitygapshock-freesubstitute
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that three seemingly different compressible fluid models—the barotropic Euler system, the quantum Euler system, and the Euler–Korteweg system—are instances of one abstract duality scheme. For any continuous, vacuum-free initial data, the associated dual optimization problem has a maximizer in spaces of finite Radon measures, and the duality gap between the relaxed primal and the dual vanishes. A time-adaptive weighting of the entropy integral makes the scheme consistent over arbitrarily long time intervals, not just small ones. As a selection principle, the paper proves that no subsolution can dissipate the total entropy earlier or faster than a suitably defined strong solution on the strong solution's lifespan. The same abstract results apply to the inviscid Burgers equation, recovering the shock-free substitute from the dual variables.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quadruple (L, F, A, K): a closed linear operator L, a matrix-convex function F (convex with respect to the positive semidefinite order), a closed linear constraint operator A, and entropy K = ½Tr F. The sharp transformation v# = ∇K(v) converts the primal system into a dual formulation whose unknown is a pair of Radon measures (E, B) constrained by the distributional relation ⟨∂_t Ψ, B⟩ + ⟨LΨ, E⟩ = 0. Time-adaptive weights h(t) = exp(−γt) allow consistency on large intervals by guaranteeing the nonnegativity condition hI + 2H L*(v#L) ≥ 0. Fenchel–Rockafellar duality is the tool showing existence of maximizers and vanishing duality gap when L(I) = 0.

What would settle it

Construct smooth initial data for the augmented Euler–Korteweg system (5.37)–(5.42) for which there are two solutions with different evolutions of the ratio ξ/ρ^ν, one preserving ξ = ρ^ν and one not; if the second is a valid subsolution whose total entropy dips below the strong solution's before time T, the entropy-rate principle fails for the original system. Alternatively, check numerically whether the dual maximizer's reconstruction via (3.10) matches the unique entropy solution for barotropic Euler at time T; a mismatch would falsify the conjectured reconstruction property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

An abstract system ∂_t v = L(F(v)) with constraint Av = 0 and entropy K = ½Tr F admits a dual problem. If a strong solution exists with a time-adapted weight making hI + 2HL*(v#L) ≥ 0, the dual value equals the primal entropy integral—no gap—and a maximizer is explicit via v# = ∇K(v). Under L(I) = 0, a maximizer of the relaxed dual exists for continuous vacuum-free data. Consistency yields an entropy-rate principle: no subsolution can have total entropy ≤ the strong solution's up to t0 and strictly below on (t0, t1). The framework is verified for barotropic Euler, quantum Euler, and Euler–Korteweg, the latter via an augmented set of variables with a linear constraint linking the gradient of

Load-bearing premise

The augmented Korteweg system with variables (q, G, ξ, ρ) and only the linear constraint ∇ξ − G = 0 is assumed to faithfully represent the Euler–Korteweg dynamics even though the nonlinear relation ξ = ρ^ν is deliberately not enforced; if the augmented system allows trajectories that do not come from the original Korteweg flow, the duality and entropy-rate conclusions would apply to a relaxed model, not to the stated one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Variational dual solutions exist for all three fluid models with continuous vacuum-free initial data, even though global weak solutions may not be known.
  • The entropy-rate principle gives a selection criterion that rules out subsolutions dissipating entropy faster than a strong solution, complementing classical shock-admissibility conditions.
  • The time-adaptive weighting extends duality consistency from small local intervals to arbitrary finite horizons, making the scheme usable for numerical and analytical purposes over long times.
  • For the inviscid Burgers equation, the dual variable recovers the shock-free substitute and remains compatible with entropy solutions containing shocks, closing a gap in earlier treatments.
  • Because the framework treats many models simultaneously, results proven for one of them—such as solvability of the dual problem—transfer automatically to the others.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Euler–Korteweg embedding deliberately drops the nonlinear constraint ξ = ρ^ν; if the augmented system admits trajectories not equivalent to the original Korteweg dynamics, the proved dual solutions and entropy-rate principle would apply to a relaxed system rather than to the stated model.
  • The existence result requires L(I) = 0 and continuous, vacuum-free data; extending it to data with vacuum or discontinuities is left as an open problem in the paper, so the practical reach of the theorem is narrower than the title might suggest.
  • The entropy-rate principle compares subsolutions with strong solutions; whether it extends to comparisons among weak solutions is not addressed, and known counterexamples for the barotropic Euler system suggest such an extension would fail.
  • The Burgers reconstruction suggests a general strategy to extract 'generalized' solutions at the terminal time from the dual variables; testing that reconstruction on shock-forming fluid examples would indicate whether it works beyond the scalar case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops an abstract duality framework for evolutionary PDEs of the form ∂_t v = L(F(v)), with a Lowner-convex matrix-valued F, entropy K = 1/2 Tr F, and a linear constraint Av = 0. The framework is applied to the barotropic Euler, quantum Euler, and Euler–Korteweg systems. The main contributions are: a consistency theorem (Theorem 3.2) showing that any strong solution satisfying a positivity condition yields a maximizer of the dual problem and equality of the primal/dual values under an adaptive weight; a Dafermos principle (Theorem 3.5) asserting that no subsolution dissipates total entropy earlier or faster than a strong solution; an existence and no-gap theorem (Theorem 4.1) for the relaxed dual problem under the assumption L(I)=0, proved via Fenchel–Rockafellar duality; and a detailed revisitation of Brenier's shock-free substitute for Burgers' equation. The arguments are largely self-contained. However, the Korteweg application depends on an unproved equivalence between the original system and an augmented system in the low-regularity solution class, and the advertised 'absence of a duality gap' is stronger than what is proved.

Significance. If the Korteweg reduction is rigorously justified, the paper gives a valuable unified treatment of variational dual solutions for three compressible fluid models, including existence of dual maximizers for continuous vacuum-free initial data and a Dafermos principle that avoids Orlicz-space restrictions. The Fenchel–Rockafellar proof is clean and the Burgers section adds useful clarification to Brenier's construction. The main reservation is that the Korteweg application may address a relaxed system rather than the original Euler–Korteweg system; this is a load-bearing gap that must be resolved before the full claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.3, Remark 5.8 and Corollary 5.9] The reduction of the Euler–Korteweg system (5.33)–(5.35) to the augmented system (5.37)–(5.42) is not justified for the solution class used in the paper. For smooth solutions, r=ξ/ρ^ν satisfies ∂_t r+(q/ρ)·∇r=0, so r(0)=1 gives r≡1 when q/ρ is Lipschitz. However, Definition 2.14 only requires v∈C([0,T]×Ω;O) with ∂_t(Hv#L), HL*(v#L) finite Radon measures; no Lipschitz or Sobolev regularity of u=q/ρ is assumed. DiPerna–Lions uniqueness is unavailable, so r(0)=1 ⇒ r≡1 may fail for continuous weak solutions/subsolutions. Thus the dual maximizers of Corollary 5.9 and the Dafermos principle in §5.3 apply to a relaxation, not necessarily to the Euler–Korteweg system. The sharp formulation is left as an exercise and no uniqueness argument for the reduction is supplied. Please prove the equivalence under the weak/strong assumptions or restrict the Korteweg claims to a class where the reduction is
  2. [Abstract and §4] The abstract and introduction state an unqualified 'absence of a duality gap'. Theorem 4.1 establishes only the restricted equality ~I(v0,T)=~J(v0,T) (relaxed primal vs dual), and the text explicitly notes that equality between I(v0,T) and ~I(v0,T) is not obtained. The abstract and Section 1 should be amended to say 'absence of a duality gap between the relaxed primal and dual problems' or similar. As written, the advertised claim is stronger than proved.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.1] Typo: 'consevativity' should be 'conservativity' in §§5.1–5.3.
  2. [Remark 2.17 and Theorem 3.2] The angle-bracket delimiters appear as corrupted glyphs (⣨); the typesetting should be fixed.
  3. [§6, Remark 6.2] In the proof, there is a stray '∫_{T1}' on its own line in the chain of equalities; this is a typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: main theorems are proved in the paper from stated assumptions; Korteweg reformulation gap is a rigor issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The abstract framework and the three central results (consistency Theorem 3.2, Dafermos principle Theorem 3.5, existence/no-gap Theorem 4.1) are derived within the paper. Theorem 3.2 verifies the dual candidate (E+,B+) using the strong-solution identities (2.8), (2.9) and Lowner convexity; it does not assume the conclusion. Theorem 3.5 is proved from Theorem 3.2, and the proof is reproduced rather than merely cited. Theorem 4.1 is a self-contained Fenchel-Rockafellar duality argument in which the Legendre transforms are computed from Definitions 2.11-2.12. Citations to the author's earlier work [61,62] are contextual or complementary (e.g., 'we include it for completeness', Remark 3.3, ballistic-transport interpretation); none is load-bearing for the new fluid applications. The only substantive concern is the Korteweg reduction advertised in Remark 5.8: 'We deliberately ignore the nonlinear constraint ξ=ρ^ν because it is already built into the system be means of (5.38) and (5.40).' For smooth solutions this is an algebraic identity, but in the weak/measure-valued class of Definition 2.14 the uniqueness of the implied transport equation for r=ξ/ρ^ν is not established; thus the dual/Dafermos results in Section 5.3 may apply to the augmented system rather than to (5.33)-(5.35). The paper itself flags related open recovery/consistency questions (Open Problems B.1, B.3, B.5, B.6). This is a correctness or proof-gap issue, not an instance of a claim reducing to its own input: the abstract theorems do not depend on the questionable equivalence, and the Korteweg application is a reformulation claim, not a fitted parameter or a self-citation chain. Hence no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated; 'variational dual solution' is a mathematical solution concept, not an entity. The main axioms are the structural convexity/conservativity assumptions of the abstract framework, the mild L(I)=0 condition, and the asserted Korteweg reformulation.

free parameters (1)
  • adaptive-weight exponent γ = not numerically fixed; chosen large enough (Remark 3.3, Theorem 3.5)
    The weight h(t)=exp(-γt) is an auxiliary construction used to force condition (3.9). In Theorem 3.5, γ is chosen after seeing the subsolution, so the optimization functional depends on the objects it is used to compare. This is a proof parameter rather than a physical constant, but it is hand-chosen and shapes the dual problem.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption K is strictly convex in O and lower semicontinuous (Assumption 2.6)
    Underlies injectivity of v↦∇K and Legendre inversion; for the fluid examples it follows from U''>0 and quadratic-over-linear terms.
  • domain assumption Conservativity condition (2.7)
    Used to prove entropy conservation and the sharp formulation; verified separately for each model, e.g., (5.9), (5.25), (5.43).
  • domain assumption L(I)=0 (4.1)
    Needed in Theorem 4.1 to prevent the dual value from being +∞; holds for all examples, including Korteweg despite zero-order terms.
  • domain assumption Pressure law structure (Assumption 5.1): P=U'y-U+U0 with 2U-dP-y convex and condition (5.6)
    Restricts admissible barotropic pressures; covers the typical range γ≤1+2/d and U=y log y.
  • domain assumption Euler-Korteweg augmented reformulation (5.37)-(5.42) and identity (5.43)
    The Korteweg results rely on this algebraic equivalence; proof is sketched, not fully derived, and the nonlinear constraint ξ=ρ^ν is dropped (Remark 5.8).
  • standard math Fenchel-Rockafellar duality theorem [59, Theorem 1.9]
    Used in Theorem 4.1 to obtain dual attainment and no duality gap.
  • standard math Brenier's results for Burgers [9, Theorem 4.2, Proposition 4.4]
    Section 6 relies on these for the shock-free substitute and the comparison argument; not central to the fluid theorems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A unified duality framework for barotropic, quantum and Korteweg fluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZU7YET2Q

@misc{pith2026260218917,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A unified duality framework for barotropic, quantum and Korteweg fluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZU7YET2Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.18917}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate a dual variational formulation, in the spirit of Brenier, for several compressible fluid models: the compressible barotropic Euler system, the quantum Euler system, and the Euler-Korteweg system. We identify a unified abstract framework encompassing all three systems, which enables a simultaneous analysis. By introducing time-adaptive weights, we establish the consistency of the duality scheme on large time intervals. We prove the existence of variational dual solutions to the corresponding Cauchy problems for continuous, vacuum-free initial data in spaces of finite Radon measures, and establish the absence of a duality gap. As an application, we formulate and prove a 'Dafermos principle' for these models: no subsolution can dissipate the total entropy earlier or at a faster rate than the corresponding strong solution on its interval of existence. We also discuss connections between our abstract consistency result and Brenier's shock-free substitutes for entropy solutions of Burgers' equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Acharya. Variational principles for nonlinear PDE systems via duality.Quart. Appl. Math., 81(1):127–140, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Acharya and A

    A. Acharya and A. N. Sengupta. Action principles for dissipative, non-holonomic Newtonian mechanics. Proc. A., 480(2293):Paper No. 20240113, 21, 2024. 4https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/00324/2025 30 D. VOROTNIKOV

    work page doi:10.54499/uid/00324/2025 2024

  3. [3]

    Acharya, B

    A. Acharya, B. Stroffolini, and A. Zarnescu. Variational dual solutions for incompressible fluids.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04911, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Antonelli, L

    P. Antonelli, L. E. Hientzsch, and P. Marcati. On some results for quantum hydrodynamical models. RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku, 2070:107–129, 2018

  5. [5]

    Antonelli and P

    P. Antonelli and P. Marcati. On the finite energy weak solutions to a system in quantum fluid dynamics. Comm. Math. Phys., 287(2):657–686, 2009

    2009

  6. [6]

    Antonelli and P

    P. Antonelli and P. Marcati. The quantum hydrodynamics system in two space dimensions.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 203(2):499–527, 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Basari´ c and T

    D. Basari´ c and T. Tang. On well-posedness of quantum fluid systems in the class of dissipative solutions. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55(3):2434–2466, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Benzoni-Gavage, R

    S. Benzoni-Gavage, R. Danchin, and S. Descombes. On the well-posedness for the Euler-Korteweg model in several space dimensions.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 56(4):1499–1579, 2007

    2007

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Brenier. The initial value problem for the Euler equations of incompressible fluids viewed as a concave maximization problem.Comm. Math. Phys., 364(2):579–605, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Y. Brenier. Examples of hidden convexity in nonlinear pdes.Preprint, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Brenier and I

    Y. Brenier and I. Moyano. Relaxed solutions for incompressible inviscid flows: a variational and grav- itational approximation to the initial value problem.Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 380(2219):Paper No. 20210078, 12, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Brenier and D

    Y. Brenier and D. Vorotnikov. On optimal transport of matrix-valued measures.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 52(3):2849–2873, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Bresch, F

    D. Bresch, F. Couderc, P. Noble, and J.-P. Vila. A generalization of the quantum Bohm identity: hyperbolic CFL condition for Euler-Korteweg equations.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 354(1):39–43, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    Bresch, M

    D. Bresch, M. Gisclon, and I. Lacroix-Violet. On Navier-Stokes-Korteweg and Euler-Korteweg systems: application to quantum fluids models.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 233(3):975–1025, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    A. C. Bronzi, M. C. Lopes Filho, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes. Wild solutions for 2d incompressible ideal flow with passive tracer.Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13(5):1333–1343, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Carles, R

    R. Carles, R. Danchin, and J.-C. Saut. Madelung, Gross-Pitaevskii and Korteweg.Nonlinearity, 25(10):2843–2873, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    Castro, D

    A. Castro, D. Faraco, and B. Gebhard. Entropy solutions to the macroscopic incompressible porous media equation.Analysis & PDE, 18(9):2241–2292, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    R. M. Chen, A. F. Vasseur, and C. Yu. Global ill-posedness for a dense set of initial data to the isentropic system of gas dynamics.Adv. Math., 393:Paper No. 108057, 46, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Chiodaroli

    E. Chiodaroli. A counterexample to well-posedness of entropy solutions to the compressible Euler system.J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 11(3):493–519, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Chiodaroli, C

    E. Chiodaroli, C. De Lellis, and O. Kreml. Global ill-posedness of the isentropic system of gas dynamics. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 68(7):1157–1190, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Chiodaroli and E

    E. Chiodaroli and E. Feireisl. Glimm’s method and density of wild data for the Euler system of gas dynamics.Nonlinearity, 37(3):Paper No. 035005, 12, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Chiodaroli and E

    E. Chiodaroli and E. Feireisl. On the density of “wild” initial data for the barotropic euler system. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 203(4):1809–1817, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Chiodaroli and O

    E. Chiodaroli and O. Kreml. On the energy dissipation rate of solutions to the compressible isentropic Euler system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 214(3):1019–1049, 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Chlebicka, P

    I. Chlebicka, P. Gwiazda, A. ´Swierczewska-Gwiazda, and A. Wr´ oblewska-Kami´ nska.Partial differen- tial equations in anisotropic Musielak-Orlicz spaces. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Cie´ slak and G

    T. Cie´ slak and G. Jamr´ oz. Maximal dissipation in Hunter-Saxton equation for bounded energy initial data.Adv. Math., 290:590–613, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    C. M. Dafermos. The entropy rate admissibility criterion for solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Differential Equations, 14:202–212, 1973. DUALITY 31

    1973

  19. [27]

    C. M. Dafermos. Maximal dissipation in equations of evolution.J. Differential Equations, 252(1):567– 587, 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    Daneri and L

    S. Daneri and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Jr. Non-uniqueness and h-principle for H¨ older-continuous weak solutions of the Euler equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 224(2):471–514, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    De Lellis and L

    C. De Lellis and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Jr. On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 195(1):225–260, 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    de Lellis and L

    C. de Lellis and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr. The Euler equations as a differential inclusion.Annals of mathematics, 170(3):1417–1436, 2009

    2009

  23. [31]

    Debiec, P

    T. Debiec, P. Gwiazda, A. ´Swierczewska-Gwiazda, and A. Tzavaras. Conservation of energy for the Euler-Korteweg equations.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 57(6):Paper No. 160, 12, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    R. J. DiPerna. Uniqueness of solutions to hyperbolic conservation laws.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 28(1):137–188, 1979

    1979

  25. [33]

    Donatelli, E

    D. Donatelli, E. Feireisl, and P. Marcati. Well/ill posedness for the Euler-Korteweg-Poisson system and related problems.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 40(7):1314–1335, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Feireisl

    E. Feireisl. Maximal dissipation and well-posedness for the compressible Euler system.J. Math. Fluid Mech., 16(3):447–461, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Feireisl, A

    E. Feireisl, A. J¨ ungel, and M. Luk´ aˇ cov´ a-Medvid’ov´ a. Maximal dissipation and well-posedness of the Euler system of gas dynamics.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2501.05134, Jan. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gangbo and M

    W. Gangbo and M. Westdickenberg. Optimal transport for the system of isentropic Euler equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 34(7-9):1041–1073, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Gebhard, J

    B. Gebhard, J. Hirsch, and J. J. Kolumb´ an. On a degenerate elliptic problem arising in the least action principle for Rayleigh-Taylor subsolutions.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 41(6):1527– 1594, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Gebhard and J

    B. Gebhard and J. J. Kolumb´ an. Relaxation of the Boussinesq system and applications to the Rayleigh- Taylor instability.NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 29(1):Paper No. 7, 38, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Gimperlein, M

    H. Gimperlein, M. Grinfeld, R. Knops, and M. Slemrod. On action rate admissibility criteria.Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik ZAMP, 77(2):57, 2026

    2026

  32. [40]

    Gimperlein, M

    H. Gimperlein, M. Grinfeld, R. J. Knops, and M. Slemrod. The least action admissibility principle. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 249(2):22, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Glimm, D

    J. Glimm, D. Lazarev, and G.-Q. G. Chen. Maximum entropy production as a necessary admissibility condition for the fluid Navier–Stokes and Euler equations.SN Applied Sciences, 2:1–9, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Griewank and P

    A. Griewank and P. J. Rabier. On the smoothness of convex envelopes.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 322(2):691–709, 1990

    1990

  35. [43]

    L. Hsiao. The entropy rate admissibility criterion in gas dynamics.J. Differential Equations, 38(2):226– 238, 1980

    1980

  36. [44]

    Khesin, G

    B. Khesin, G. Misio/suppress lek, and K. Modin. Geometry of the Madelung transform.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 234(2):549–573, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    S.-C. Klein. Using the Dafermos entropy rate criterion in numerical schemes.BIT, 62(4):1673–1701, 2022

    2022

  38. [46]

    S.-C. Klein. Stabilizing discontinuous Galerkin methods using Dafermos’ entropy rate criterion: I— One-dimensional conservation laws.J. Sci. Comput., 95(2):Paper No. 55, 37, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    S.-C. Klein. Stabilizing discontinuous Galerkin methods using Dafermos’ entropy rate criterion: II— Systems of conservation laws and entropy inequality predictors.J. Sci. Comput., 100(2):Paper No. 42, 49, 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Klingenberg, O

    C. Klingenberg, O. Kreml, V. M´ acha, and S. Markfelder. Shocks make the Riemann problem for the full Euler system in multiple space dimensions ill-posed.Nonlinearity, 33(12):6517–6540, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    F. Kraus. ¨Uber konvexe Matrixfunktionen.Math. Z., 41(1):18–42, 1936

    1936

  42. [50]

    Krejˇ c´ ı and I

    P. Krejˇ c´ ı and I. Straˇ skraba. A uniqueness criterion for the Riemann problem.Hiroshima Math. J., 27(2):307–346, 1997. 32 D. VOROTNIKOV

    1997

  43. [51]

    Li and J

    B. Li and J. Zou. On a general matrix-valued unbalanced optimal transport problem.European J. Appl. Math., 36(6):1063–1095, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    L¨ owner.¨Uber monotone Matrixfunktionen.Math

    K. L¨ owner.¨Uber monotone Matrixfunktionen.Math. Z., 38(1):177–216, 1934

    1934

  45. [53]

    Markfelder and V

    S. Markfelder and V. Pellhammer. Failure of the least action admissibility principle in the context of the compressible euler equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09292, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  46. [54]

    L. M. Martyushev and V. D. Seleznev. Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology.Phys. Rep., 426(1):1–45, 2006

    2006

  47. [55]

    Mirebeau and E

    J.-M. Mirebeau and E. Stampfli. Discretization and convergence of the ballistic benamou-brenier for- mulation of the porous medium and burgers equations.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2511, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Prigogine.Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes

    I. Prigogine.Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Interscience Publishers, New York-London, revised edition, 1961

    1961

  49. [57]

    R. T. Rockafellar.Convex analysis, volume No. 28 ofPrinceton Mathematical Series. Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970

    1970

  50. [58]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. Ginster, and A. Acharya. A hidden convexity of nonlinear elasticity.J. Elasticity, 156(3):975–1014, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Villani.Topics in optimal transportation

    C. Villani.Topics in optimal transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003

    2003

  52. [60]

    von Renesse

    M.-K. von Renesse. An optimal transport view of Schr¨ odinger’s equation.Canad. Math. Bull., 55(4):858–869, 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    Vorotnikov

    D. Vorotnikov. Partial differential equations with quadratic nonlinearities viewed as matrix-valued optimal ballistic transport problems.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 243(3):1653–1698, 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Vorotnikov

    D. Vorotnikov. Dafermos’ principle and Brenier’s duality scheme for defocusing dispersive equations. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2501.05389, Jan. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Vorotnikov and A

    D. Vorotnikov and A. Acharya. On the variational dual formulation of the Nash system and an adaptive convex gradient-flow approach to nonlinear PDEs.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2512.12878, Dec. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    H. Ziegler. Some extremum principles in irreversible thermodynamics with application to continuum mechanics. InProgress in solid mechanics, Vol. IV, pages 91–193. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1963. (D. Vorotnikov)University of Coimbra, CMUC, Department of Mathematics, 3001-501 Co...

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.