Recognition: unknown
Learning Physical Operators using Neural Operators
read the original abstract
Neural operators have emerged as promising surrogate models for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but struggle to generalise beyond training distributions and are often constrained to a fixed temporal discretisation. This work introduces a physics-informed training framework that addresses these limitations by decomposing PDEs using operator splitting methods, training separate neural operators to learn individual non-linear physical operators while approximating linear operators with fixed finite-difference convolutions. This modular mixture-of-experts architecture enables generalisation to novel physical regimes by explicitly encoding the underlying operator structure. We formulate the modelling task as a neural ordinary differential equation (ODE) where these learned operators constitute the right-hand side, enabling continuous-in-time predictions through standard ODE solvers and implicitly enforcing PDE constraints. Demonstrated on incompressible and compressible Navier--Stokes equations, our approach achieves better convergence and superior performance when generalising to unseen physics. The method remains parameter-efficient, enabling temporal extrapolation beyond training horizons, and provides interpretable components whose behaviour can be verified against known physics.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HyCOP: Hybrid Composition Operators for Interpretable Learning of PDEs
HyCOP learns policies over compositions of hybrid modules to produce interpretable programs for parametric PDE solution operators with order-of-magnitude OOD gains over monolithic neural operators.
-
Large-eddy simulation nets (LESnets) based on physics-informed neural operator for wall-bounded turbulence
LESnets integrates LES equations and the law of the wall into F-FNO to enable data-free, stable long-term predictions of wall-bounded turbulence at Re_tau up to 1000 on coarse grids, matching traditional LES accuracy ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.