Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Silicon single-photon emitters are among the most promising quantum-network hardware platforms; their main barrier is a 10- to 1000-fold reduction of spectral noise.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:23 UTC pith:MA4ABROI

load-bearing objection A careful, candid review that gives the silicon-emitter field a useful scoreboard, but don't mistake the C≫1 roadmap for a proven scaling law. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.02201 v3 pith:MA4ABROI submitted 2026-03-02 quant-ph cond-mat.other

Single-photon emitters and spin-photon interfaces in silicon

Kilian Sandholzer , Ian Berkman , Peter De\'ak , Carlos Errando-Herranz , Petros-Panagis Filippatos , Adam Gali , Andreas Gritsch , Andreas Reiserer This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.other
keywords single-photon emitterssilicon photonicserbium dopantscolor centersspin-photon interfacesPurcell enhancementspectral diffusionquantum networks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review makes the case that silicon is a uniquely mature host for quantum-network hardware: its wafers, fabrication processes, and telecom-wavelength emitters already exist. Two families of emitters are central — erbium dopants, whose shielded 4f electrons give narrow lines, and carbon/hydrogen color centers such as the T center, which offer spin qubits and memory. The review's quantitative core is a scoreboard: Er:Si in a photonic-crystal cavity has reached a cooperativity of C≈1 (Purcell factor 177), while T-center devices sit at C≈0.1; closing the gap needs roughly a 10-fold linewidth improvement in Er:Si and a 100- to 1000-fold improvement in color centers. The stated bottleneck is not photon extraction but spectral stability: both platforms are limited by electric-field noise from fluctuating charges at interfaces and defects, so the route to C≫1 is cavity-enhanced lifetime reduction plus charge-environment stabilization. If the review is right, silicon's established manufacturing could turn these emitters into scalable quantum repeaters and distributed quantum processors.

Core claim

The central claim is that silicon can host deterministic single-photon sources and spin-photon interfaces that are coherent, telecom-compatible, and manufacturable at scale. The evidence is built around two emitter families: erbium dopants, whose 1.54-micron emission comes from shielded 4f transitions, and color centers (T, G, W, C) that emit in telecom bands and can carry spin qubits. In nanophotonic cavities, erbium in site A shows a Purcell factor of 177 and cooperativity C≈1, while T centers in similar devices reach C≈0.1. In both platforms the limiting quantity is spectral diffusion — gigahertz-scale for color centers, about 20 MHz for erbium — far above the lifetime-limited linewidth.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cooperativity C, a dimensionless number that must rise well above 1 for emitted photons to be coherent enough for linear-optics quantum processing. The lever to raise it is the Purcell effect: a photonic-crystal cavity raises the local density of optical states, shortens the radiative lifetime, and broadens the Fourier-limited linewidth past the dephasing rate. The countervailing mechanism is spectral diffusion from electric-field noise — fluctuating charges at interfaces, in the bulk, and charge reconfiguration induced by the excitation laser itself. Because every silicon emitter discussed in the review sits in a polar lattice site with a nonzero linear Stark shift

Load-bearing premise

The forward-looking promise depends on the premise that the spectral instability seen in nanophotonic devices is an addressable engineering problem — traceable to surface and interface charge traps that can be passivated or depleted — rather than an intrinsic material limit that cannot be engineered away.

What would settle it

A concrete test: prepare identical silicon nanophotonic cavities with the same emitter species (Er or T center), then systematically vary surface passivation, applied bias, and laser power. If the spectral-diffusion linewidth fails to shrink by the required factor (about 10 for Er, 100-1000 for color centers) even under strong depletion and passivation, the C≫1 roadmap collapses. A simpler contradictory observation would be finding no correlation between surface treatment and measured linewidth across many devices.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Er:Si devices are already at C≈1 in photonic-crystal cavities, so a further 10x linewidth reduction should put them deep into the regime needed for high-rate remote entanglement.
  • T-center devices, currently at C≈0.1, would need a 100-1000x reduction in spectral-diffusion linewidth to match that performance; reaching it would unlock their long-lived nuclear-spin registers for distributed quantum computing.
  • The diagnosis points device engineering toward surface passivation, bias-field depletion of charge traps, and reduced laser-induced charge reconfiguration, rather than only higher resonator quality factors.
  • With C≫1, the strong temporal filtering currently used in two-photon interference experiments becomes unnecessary, increasing both the rate and the fidelity of remote entanglement.
  • Silicon's wafer-scale photonics already solves much of the integration side; the remaining determinism-and-stability problem is what stands between isolated single-emitter experiments and multiplexed quantum networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: if charge noise is surface-dominated, the spectral linewidth should respond strongly to surface passivation and depletion bias; a null result would indicate an intrinsic material limit and would falsify the engineering-fix premise.
  • The review's numbers suggest a useful community metric: report the homogeneous linewidth at a fixed cavity-enhancement factor, so different emitters and devices can be compared on equal footing.
  • The same electric-field-noise mechanism likely limits other nanophotonic quantum emitters, so a silicon-specific depletion/passivation solution could become a general template for solid-state quantum light sources.
  • Once C≫1 is reached, the bottleneck is likely to shift from optical coherence to spin coherence under optical excitation and to deterministic emitter placement; the research agenda would then move toward spin-echo fidelity and site-selective fabrication.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review surveys single-photon emitters and spin-photon interfaces in silicon, focusing on erbium dopants and G/T/W/C color centers. It summarizes their bulk optical and spin properties, theoretical / ab initio modeling, integration into nanophotonic waveguides and cavities, and strategies for scaling to large numbers of emitters. The paper's quantitative core is a 'scoreboard' in which Er:Si in photonic-crystal cavities has reached C≈1 (Purcell factor 177), T-center devices sit at C≈0.1, and closing the gap to C≫1 requires an improvement factor of ~10 in Er:Si and 100–1000 in color-center devices, achieved mainly by reducing spectral-diffusion linewidths (Sec. IV.B.2). The review is unusually candid: it marks predicted versus measured values (Table I), flags the disputed T-center quantum efficiency (Sec. III.C.1), admits the erbium site-A/B yield is only ≳1%, and repeatedly states that the dominant charge-noise source is an open question.

Significance. As a synthesis, the review is valuable and largely faithful to the literature. Its most useful contributions are the comparative tables (I and II), the explicit discussion of predicted versus measured quantities, and the articulation of a falsifiable claim that spectral stability—not photon extraction—is the main bottleneck for silicon-based spin-photon interfaces. If correct, the roadmap would redirect effort toward charge-noise mitigation and Purcell-enhanced lifetime reduction. The paper also demonstrates good scientific honesty in highlighting unresolved issues, including the limited integration yield, the disputed T-center quantum efficiency, and the unknown identity of the dominant charge-noise source. The main weakness is that the quantitative forward-looking claim rests on an untested independence assumption, which is discussed in the major comments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV.B.2, Eq. (6)] The central roadmap states that Fourier-limited operation can be reached by increasing the Purcell factor, with required improvements of ~10 in Er:Si and 100–1000 in color centers. This uses C ≈ F_P γ_g / γ_d, implicitly treating F_P and γ_d as independent. However, the largest F_P values in Table II are obtained in small mode volumes (V ≈ 0.2–0.83 (λ/n)^3), placing emitters close to etched surfaces—the same interfaces to which the paper attributes charge-noise dephasing. The review itself concedes that 'which of these charge noise sources is dominant remains an open question' and notes the risk of surface-induced non-radiative decay at small V (Sec. IV.B.1). No data are presented on γ_d or σ_SD as a function of F_P or surface distance. If charge noise scales with surface proximity, C does not grow linearly with F_P, and the quoted improvement factors are optimistic. The authors should e
  2. [Sec. IV.B.2 and Table II] The numerical improvement factors (100–1000 for color centers) are not derived from a stated model connecting the measured spectral-diffusion linewidth σ_SD to the homogeneous dephasing rate γ_d used in Eq. (6). The σ_SD values in Table II are heterogeneous: one is power-broadened, one is extracted graphically, and the measurements are taken on different timescales (fast versus slow spectral diffusion). These differences can change the apparent factor relative to the lifetime limit by orders of magnitude. The manuscript should specify how σ_SD maps onto γ_d and justify the quoted factors under consistent measurement conditions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 2] The text says the near-infrared emission 'falls between the band-edge of silicon ... and the L-band, as summarized in Fig. 2c,' but the wavelength information is in Fig. 2b; Fig. 2c illustrates decoherence sources. Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Table I] The entry for Er:Si in the DWF column is marked '**' with a footnote explaining it is a branching ratio of crystal-field transitions. This is clear but could be made more explicit in the column header or in the main text to avoid confusion with the Debye-Waller factor.
  3. [Table II] The caption states that σ_SD is the spectral diffusion linewidth of the narrowest emitter, but some values are power-broadened or extracted graphically. A brief note about the measurement conditions and timescales would strengthen the comparability of the values.
  4. [Sec. III.C.1] When reporting the T-center quantum efficiency, the text gives a range from >23.4% to 18.1% (hydrogen) and near-unity (deuterated). Table I lists '~0.2*' for η_QE; please clarify that this is the hydrogen-based, predicted value and that the deuterated value is not shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; synthesis of measured literature with standard definitions.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not a derivation. The central quantitative claims are compiled experimental values (Table II) and standard identities. Eq. (6) (C ≃ F_P γ_g/γ_d) is a definitional identity from cavity QED; the improvement factors in Sec. IV.B.2 ("an improvement factor of ∼10 in Er:Si, and 100 to 1000 in color-center devices") are arithmetic ratios of measured spectral-diffusion to lifetime-limited linewidths. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (refs 60, 64, 71, 75, 81, 213; Deák/Gali DFT papers) are experimental/computational results that are externally reproducible, and the platform assessment is independently corroborated by non-overlapping groups (e.g., Photonic Inc, ref 120; Sipahigil; Rogge). The forward-looking roadmap assumes that Purcell enhancement and dephasing are independent; the paper itself flags this as an open question ("which of these charge noise sources is dominant remains an open question") and calls for further investigation. That is a testable assumption/correctness risk, not a circular reduction. The only caveat is the heavy reliance on the authors' own Er:Si measurements, but this is normal specialty self-citation, not load-bearing in the sense of equivalences.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters, fitted constants, or invented entities; its quantitative payload is imported from cited primary experiments and calculations. The ledger entries capture the background assumptions the assessment inherits: the cavity-QED framework that defines its metric, the lifetime-to-Purcell inference used in Table II, and the fidelity of cited numbers — several from unreviewed preprints. The authors themselves flag the most fragile link: the dominant charge-noise source "remains an open question" (Sec. IV.B.2).

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Cooperativity C = g²/(2κγ⊥) (Eq. 7) is the appropriate single figure of merit for ranking spin-photon interfaces.
    Invoked throughout Secs. II, IV.B.2, and V.B to compare Er:Si (C≈1) with T centers (C≈0.1). It is a standard cavity-QED result imported from the cited literature (refs. 6, 28, 48, 54), not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Lifetime-derived Purcell factor FP = R/R0 (Eq. 5, Table II) isolates radiative enhancement.
    Table II computes FP from measured bulk vs. nanostructure lifetimes. If nanofabrication adds non-radiative decay channels, the apparent FP overstates the true Purcell enhancement. Table I shows ηQE is exactly what is uncertain for several centers (T: 0.2*, C: ?), so the scoreboard inherits that uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The numbers in Tables I–II faithfully represent the cited primary sources.
    Several load-bearing entries are unreviewed arXiv preprints (refs. 76, 109, 113, 114, 116, 120, 136, 213, 241), e.g., millisecond 28Si erbium spin coherence (ref. 76) and C≈1 in 2-µm membranes (ref. 241). The review's assessments would shift if these numbers change on peer review.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 51405 in / 19459 out tokens · 174550 ms · 2026-08-02T19:23:44.572057+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Single photons enable the distribution of quantum information over large distances and thus play a major role in quantum technologies such as communication and computing. Solid-state emitters are practical and efficient sources of single photons that can be manufactured in large numbers. When combined with a spin, the resulting spin-photon interfaces can store quantum states for extended periods and serve as the basis for quantum networks and repeaters. Among the many host materials explored over the past few decades, silicon stands out for its advanced nanofabrication, the maturity of its integrated photonics and microelectronics, and its high isotopic purity, which leads to exceptionally long spin coherence. These properties position silicon single-photon emitters and spin-photon interfaces among the most promising hardware platforms for implementing quantum networks and distributed quantum information processors. This review summarizes the current state of the art and open challenges towards coherent single-photon sources and scalable spin-photon interfaces based on color centers and erbium dopants in nanophotonic silicon structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.02201 by Adam Gali, Andreas Gritsch, Andreas Reiserer, Carlos Errando-Herranz, Ian Berkman, Kilian Sandholzer, Peter De\'ak, Petros-Panagis Filippatos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: , is very similar in all materials and sites owing to the shielding of the inner 4f levels. At cryogenic temperature, only the lowest CF level, Z1, of the 4 I15/2 ground state mani￾fold will be populated. The temperature required for coherent operation thus depends on the separation between Z1 and Z2, which is on the order of THz in low-symmetry sites66 . The precise ordering and separation of the CF level… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For silicon, high-throughput first-principles screen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: c. At the mode maximum, this enables high coupling efficiencies of embedded emitters to the guided mode, which can approach β ≲ 0.8 for typical devices in silicon; in addi￾tion, it can lead to a significant slowdown of the decay of em￾bedded emitters in the absence of non-radiative relaxation60 . Ridge waveguides have been used for the study of color cen￾ters ensembles119,216, erbium dopant ensembles60,64,… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optical linewidth narrowing for device-coupled single T centers

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Above-band optical excitation narrows device-coupled single T-center linewidths by up to 70% via free-carrier filling of charge traps, with dynamics captured by a rate-equation model.

  2. Optical detection of the electron spin resonances of G centers in silicon

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    G centers in silicon show optically detectable spin resonances and coherent control, opening paths for silicon-based quantum devices.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 160 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    \ Pan , author Z.-B

    author author J.-W. \ Pan , author Z.-B. \ Chen , author C.-Y. \ Lu , author H. Weinfurter , author A. Zeilinger , \ and\ author M. \.Z ukowski ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.777 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 777 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 2012

  2. [2]

    author author J. L. \ O'Brien , author G. J. \ Pryde , author A. G. \ White , author T. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author D. Branning ,\ 10.1038/nature02054 journal journal Nature \ volume 426 ,\ pages 264 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature02054 2003

  3. [3]

    Pirandola , author J

    author author S. Pirandola , author J. Eisert , author C. Weedbrook , author A. Furusawa , \ and\ author S. L. \ Braunstein ,\ 10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 journal journal Nat Photon \ volume 9 ,\ pages 641 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 2015

  4. [4]

    Gisin , author G

    author author N. Gisin , author G. Ribordy , author W. Tittel , \ and\ author H. Zbinden ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 74 ,\ pages 145 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 2002

  5. [5]

    \ Duan \ and\ author C

    author author L.-M. \ Duan \ and\ author C. Monroe ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1209 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1209 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1209 2010

  6. [6]

    Reiserer \ and\ author G

    author author A. Reiserer \ and\ author G. Rempe ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1379 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1379 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1379 2015

  7. [7]

    Wehner , author D

    author author S. Wehner , author D. Elkouss , \ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ 10.1126/science.aam9288 journal journal Science \ volume 362 ,\ pages eaam9288 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 2018

  8. [8]

    Rudolph ,\ 10.1063/1.4976737 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 030901 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    author author T. Rudolph ,\ 10.1063/1.4976737 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 030901 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.4976737 2017

  9. [9]

    Slussarenko \ and\ author G

    author author S. Slussarenko \ and\ author G. J. \ Pryde ,\ 10.1063/1.5115814 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 6 ,\ pages 041303 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.5115814 2019

  10. [10]

    Alexander , author A

    author author K. Alexander , author A. Benyamini , author D. Black , author D. Bonneau , author S. Burgos , author B. Burridge , author H. Cable , author G. Campbell , author G. Catalano , author A. Ceballos , author C.-M. \ Chang , author S. S. \ Choudhury , author C. J. \ Chung , author F. Danesh , author T. Dauer , author M. Davis , author E. Dudley , ...

    2025

  11. [11]

    Maring , author A

    author author N. Maring , author A. Fyrillas , author M. Pont , author E. Ivanov , author P. Stepanov , author N. Margaria , author W. Hease , author A. Pishchagin , author A. Lema \^i tre , author I. Sagnes , author T. H. \ Au , author S. Boissier , author E. Bertasi , author A. Baert , author M. Valdivia , author M. Billard , author O. Acar , author A. ...

    2024

  12. [12]

    Afzelius , author N

    author author M. Afzelius , author N. Gisin , \ and\ author H. de Riedmatten ,\ 10.1063/PT.3.3021 journal journal Physics Today \ volume 68 ,\ pages 42 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/pt.3.3021 2015

  13. [13]

    Yan , author S

    author author X. Yan , author S. Gitt , author B. Lin , author D. Witt , author M. Abdolahi , author A. Afifi , author A. Azem , author A. Darcie , author J. Wu , author K. Awan , author M. Mitchell , author A. Pfenning , author L. Chrostowski , \ and\ author J. F. \ Young ,\ 10.1063/5.0049372 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 070901 ( yea...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0049372 2021

  14. [14]

    Simmons ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010102 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 010102 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author S. Simmons ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010102 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 010102 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010102 2024

  15. [15]

    author author S. L. \ Braunstein \ and\ author P. van Loock ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 513 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 2005

  16. [16]

    Weedbrook , author S

    author author C. Weedbrook , author S. Pirandola , author R. Garc \'i a-Patr \'o n , author N. J. \ Cerf , author T. C. \ Ralph , author J. H. \ Shapiro , \ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 621 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.621 2012

  17. [17]

    Aharonovich , author D

    author author I. Aharonovich , author D. Englund , \ and\ author M. Toth ,\ 10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 631 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 2016

  18. [18]

    Senellart , author G

    author author P. Senellart , author G. Solomon , \ and\ author A. White ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2017.218 journal journal Nature Nanotech \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1026 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.218 2017

  19. [19]

    author author A. M. \ Fox ,\ 10.1002/qute.202300390 journal journal Advanced Quantum Technologies \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2300390 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/qute.202300390 2025

  20. [20]

    Holewa , author A

    author author P. Holewa , author A. Reiserer , author T. Heindel , author S. Sanguinetti , author A. Huck , \ and\ author E. Semenova ,\ 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0747 journal journal Nanophotonics \ ( year 2025 ),\ 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0747 NoStop

    doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0747 2024

  21. [21]

    Wang , author K

    author author Y. Wang , author K. D. \ J \"o ns , \ and\ author Z. Sun ,\ 10.1063/5.0030258 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 8 ,\ pages 011314 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/5.0030258 2021

  22. [22]

    Wang , author Q

    author author H. Wang , author Q. Zeng , author H. Ma , \ and\ author Z. Yuan ,\ 10.34133/adi.0032 journal journal Advanced Devices & Instrumentation \ volume 5 ,\ pages 0032 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.34133/adi.0032 2024

  23. [23]

    Barbieri , author T

    author author M. Barbieri , author T. Weinhold , author B. Lanyon , author A. Gilchrist , author K. Resch , author M. Almeida , \ and\ author A. White ,\ 10.1080/09500340802337374 journal journal Journal of Modern Optics \ volume 56 ,\ pages 209 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1080/09500340802337374 2009

  24. [24]

    Christ \ and\ author C

    author author A. Christ \ and\ author C. Silberhorn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.023829 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 85 ,\ pages 023829 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.023829 2012

  25. [25]

    Thomas , author L

    author author P. Thomas , author L. Ruscio , author O. Morin , \ and\ author G. Rempe ,\ 10.1038/s41586-022-04987-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 608 ,\ pages 677 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04987-5 2022

  26. [26]

    Cogan , author Z.-E

    author author D. Cogan , author Z.-E. \ Su , author O. Kenneth , \ and\ author D. Gershoni ,\ 10.1038/s41566-022-01152-2 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 17 ,\ pages 324 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41566-022-01152-2 2023

  27. [27]

    \ Briegel , author W

    author author H.-J. \ Briegel , author W. D \"u r , author J. I. \ Cirac , \ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5932 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 81 ,\ pages 5932 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 1998

  28. [28]

    Reiserer ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.041003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 94 ,\ pages 041003 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    author author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.041003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 94 ,\ pages 041003 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.041003 2022

  29. [29]

    author author M. V. G. \ Dutt , author L. Childress , author L. Jiang , author E. Togan , author J. Maze , author F. Jelezko , author A. S. \ Zibrov , author P. R. \ Hemmer , \ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ 10.1126/science.1139831 journal journal Science \ volume 316 ,\ pages 1312 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1139831 2007

  30. [30]

    Robledo , author L

    author author L. Robledo , author L. Childress , author H. Bernien , author B. Hensen , author P. F. A. \ Alkemade , \ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ 10.1038/nature10401 journal journal Nature \ volume 477 ,\ pages 574 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature10401 2011

  31. [31]

    author author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen , author H. Bluhm , author J. S. \ Clarke , author A. S. \ Dzurak , author R. Ishihara , author A. Morello , author D. J. \ Reilly , author L. R. \ Schreiber , \ and\ author M. Veldhorst ,\ 10.1038/s41534-017-0038-y journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0038-y 2017

  32. [32]

    Saeedi , author S

    author author K. Saeedi , author S. Simmons , author J. Z. \ Salvail , author P. Dluhy , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author P. Becker , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author M. L. W. \ Thewalt ,\ 10.1126/science.1239584 journal journal Science \ volume 342 ,\ pages 830 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1239584 2013

  33. [33]

    Zhong , author M

    author author M. Zhong , author M. P. \ Hedges , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , author J. G. \ Bartholomew , author S. E. \ Beavan , author S. M. \ Wittig , author J. J. \ Longdell , \ and\ author M. J. \ Sellars ,\ 10.1038/nature14025 journal journal Nature \ volume 517 ,\ pages 177 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature14025 2015

  34. [34]

    Wang , author M

    author author F. Wang , author M. Ren , author W. Sun , author M. Guo , author M. J. \ Sellars , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , author J. G. \ Bartholomew , author J. Yao , author S. Liu , \ and\ author M. Zhong ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010302 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 6 ,\ pages 010302 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010302 2025

  35. [35]

    Wolfowicz , author F

    author author G. Wolfowicz , author F. J. \ Heremans , author C. P. \ Anderson , author S. Kanai , author H. Seo , author A. Gali , author G. Galli , \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ 10.1038/s41578-021-00306-y journal journal Nature Reviews Materials \ volume 6 ,\ pages 906 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00306-y 2021

  36. [36]

    Suter \ and\ author G

    author author D. Suter \ and\ author G. A. \ \'A lvarez ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.041001 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 88 ,\ pages 041001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041001 2016

  37. [37]

    Zhou , author L

    author author H. Zhou , author L. S. \ Martin , author M. Tyler , author O. Makarova , author N. Leitao , author H. Park , \ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.220803 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 131 ,\ pages 220803 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.220803 2023

  38. [38]

    author author M. H. \ Abobeih , author J. Cramer , author M. A. \ Bakker , author N. Kalb , author M. Markham , author D. J. \ Twitchen , \ and\ author T. H. \ Taminiau ,\ 10.1038/s41467-018-04916-z journal journal Nature Comm. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 2552 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04916-z 2018

  39. [39]

    author author N. P. \ Breuckmann \ and\ author J. N. \ Eberhardt ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040101 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 040101 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040101 2021

  40. [40]

    Petrovich , author E

    author author M. Petrovich , author E. Numkam Fokoua , author Y. Chen , author H. Sakr , author A. I. \ Adamu , author R. Hassan , author D. Wu , author R. Fatobene Ando , author A. Papadimopoulos , author S. R. \ Sandoghchi , author G. Jasion , \ and\ author F. Poletti ,\ 10.1038/s41566-025-01747-5 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 19 ,\ pages 12...

    doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01747-5 2025

  41. [41]

    author author D. S. \ Levonian , author R. Riedinger , author B. Machielse , author E. N. \ Knall , author M. K. \ Bhaskar , author C. M. \ Knaut , author R. Bekenstein , author H. Park , author M. Lon c ar , \ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.213602 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 128 ,\ pages 213602 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.213602 2022

  42. [42]

    Vittorini , author D

    author author G. Vittorini , author D. Hucul , author I. V. \ Inlek , author C. Crocker , \ and\ author C. Monroe ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.040302 journal journal Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 040302 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.040302 2014

  43. [43]

    Chen , author M

    author author S. Chen , author M. Raha , author C. M. \ Phenicie , author S. Ourari , \ and\ author J. D. \ Thompson ,\ 10.1126/science.abc7821 journal journal Science \ volume 370 ,\ pages 592 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abc7821 2020

  44. [44]

    u h , author F. Salamon , author A. Holz \

    author author A. Ulanowski , author J. Fr \"u h , author F. Salamon , author A. Holz \"a pfel , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1002/adom.202302897 journal journal Advanced Optical Materials \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2302897 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202302897 2024

  45. [45]

    Ruskuc , author C.-J

    author author A. Ruskuc , author C.-J. \ Wu , author E. Green , author S. L. N. \ Hermans , author W. Pajak , author J. Choi , \ and\ author A. Faraon ,\ 10.1038/s41586-024-08537-z journal journal Nature \ volume 639 ,\ pages 54 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08537-z 2025

  46. [46]

    author author M. T. \ Uysal \ and\ author J. D. \ Thompson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052606 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 110 ,\ pages 052606 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.052606 2024

  47. [47]

    Ortu , author A

    author author A. Ortu , author A. Tiranov , author S. Welinski , author F. Fr \"o wis , author N. Gisin , author A. Ferrier , author P. Goldner , \ and\ author M. Afzelius ,\ 10.1038/s41563-018-0138-x journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 17 ,\ pages 671 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0138-x 2018

  48. [48]

    Lodahl , author S

    author author P. Lodahl , author S. Mahmoodian , \ and\ author S. Stobbe ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.347 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 347 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 2015

  49. [49]

    author author C. P. \ Anderson , author A. Bourassa , author K. C. \ Miao , author G. Wolfowicz , author P. J. \ Mintun , author A. L. \ Crook , author H. Abe , author J. U. \ Hassan , author N. T. \ Son , author T. Ohshima , \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ 10.1126/science.aax9406 journal journal Science \ volume 366 ,\ pages 1225 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aax9406 2019

  50. [50]

    author author R. M. \ Macfarlane ,\ 10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.08.012 journal journal Journal of Luminescence \ series Festschrift in Honor of Academician Alexander A . Kaplyanskii ,\ volume 125 ,\ pages 156 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.08.012 2006

  51. [51]

    author author A. A. \ Kaplyanskii ,\ 10.1016/S0022-2313(02)00436-2 journal journal Journal of Luminescence \ volume 100 ,\ pages 21 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-2313(02)00436-2 2002

  52. [52]

    Yablonovitch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2059 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 58 ,\ pages 2059 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    author author E. Yablonovitch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2059 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 58 ,\ pages 2059 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.2059 2059

  53. [53]

    author author E. M. \ Purcell ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 69 ,\ pages 681 ( year 1946 ) NoStop

    1946

  54. [54]

    Janitz , author M

    author author E. Janitz , author M. K. \ Bhaskar , \ and\ author L. Childress ,\ 10.1364/OPTICA.398628 journal journal Optica \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1232 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1364/optica.398628 2020

  55. [55]

    Shekhar , author W

    author author S. Shekhar , author W. Bogaerts , author L. Chrostowski , author J. E. \ Bowers , author M. Hochberg , author R. Soref , \ and\ author B. J. \ Shastri ,\ 10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 751 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 2024

  56. [56]

    Rahim , author T

    author author A. Rahim , author T. Spuesens , author R. Baets , \ and\ author W. Bogaerts ,\ 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2878686 journal journal Proceedings of the IEEE \ volume 106 ,\ pages 2313 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Hull ,\ @noop title Properties of Crystalline Silicon \ ( publisher IET ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

    author author R. Hull ,\ @noop title Properties of Crystalline Silicon \ ( publisher IET ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  58. [58]

    author author A. M. \ Stoneham ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.41.82 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 41 ,\ pages 82 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.41.82 1969

  59. [59]

    Davies ,\ 10.1016/0370-1573(89)90064-1 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 176 ,\ pages 83 ( year 1989 a ) NoStop

    author author G. Davies ,\ 10.1016/0370-1573(89)90064-1 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 176 ,\ pages 83 ( year 1989 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(89)90064-1 1989

  60. [60]

    Gritsch , author L

    author author A. Gritsch , author L. Weiss , author J. Fr \"u h , author S. Rinner , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.041009 journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 12 ,\ pages 041009 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.041009 2022

  61. [61]

    Cardona \ and\ author M

    author author M. Cardona \ and\ author M. L. W. \ Thewalt ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1173 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 1173 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.1173 2005

  62. [62]

    Chartrand , author L

    author author C. Chartrand , author L. Bergeron , author K. J. \ Morse , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author P. Becker , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author S. Simmons , \ and\ author M. L. W. \ Thewalt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.195201 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 195201 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.195201 2018

  63. [63]

    author author E. R. \ MacQuarrie , author C. Chartrand , author D. B. \ Higginbottom , author K. J. \ Morse , author V. A. \ Karasyuk , author S. Roorda , \ and\ author S. Simmons ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ac291f journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 23 ,\ pages 103008 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac291f 2021

  64. [64]

    Weiss , author A

    author author L. Weiss , author A. Gritsch , author B. Merkel , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1364/OPTICA.413330 journal journal Optica \ volume 8 ,\ pages 40 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.413330 2021

  65. [65]

    Liu , author S

    author author Y. Liu , author S. Rinner , author T. Remmele , author O. Ernst , author A. Reiserer , \ and\ author T. Boeck ,\ 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126733 journal journal Journal of Crystal Growth \ volume 593 ,\ pages 126733 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    author author C. W. \ Thiel , author T. B \"o ttger , \ and\ author R. L. \ Cone ,\ 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.12.015 journal journal Journal of Luminescence \ series Selected Papers from DPC '10 ,\ volume 131 ,\ pages 353 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.12.015 2010

  67. [67]

    Priolo , author G

    author author F. Priolo , author G. Franz \`o , author S. Coffa , \ and\ author A. Carnera ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.4443 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 57 ,\ pages 4443 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.4443 1998

  68. [68]

    author author A. J. \ Kenyon ,\ 10.1088/0268-1242/20/12/R02 journal journal Semiconductor Science and Technology \ volume 20 ,\ pages R65 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0268-1242/20/12/r02 2005

  69. [69]

    author author N. Q. \ Vinh , author N. N. \ Ha , \ and\ author T. Gregorkiewicz ,\ 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2018220 journal journal Proceedings of the IEEE \ volume 97 ,\ pages 1269 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2009

  70. [70]

    Sandholzer , author S

    author author K. Sandholzer , author S. Rinner , author J. Edelmann , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0678 journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 2005 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0678 2024

  71. [71]

    Gritsch , author A

    author author A. Gritsch , author A. Ulanowski , author J. Pforr , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1038/s41467-024-55552-9 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 16 ,\ pages 64 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55552-9 2025

  72. [72]

    Zhang , author G

    author author Q. Zhang , author G. Hu , author G. G. \ de Boo , author M. Ran c i \'c , author B. C. \ Johnson , author J. C. \ McCallum , author J. Du , author M. J. \ Sellars , author C. Yin , \ and\ author S. Rogge ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01281 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 19 ,\ pages 5025 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01281 2019

  73. [73]

    Liu \ and\ editor B

    editor G. Liu \ and\ editor B. Jacquier ,\ eds.,\ 10.1007/3-540-28209-2 title Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths in Optical Materials ,\ series Springer Series in Materials Science , Vol. volume 83 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin, Heidelberg ,\ year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-28209-2 2005

  74. [74]

    author author A. G. \ Maryasov \ and\ author M. K. \ Bowman ,\ 10.1007/s00723-020-01257-3 journal journal Applied Magnetic Resonance \ volume 51 ,\ pages 1201 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s00723-020-01257-3 2020

  75. [75]

    Holz \"a pfel , author S

    author author A. Holz \"a pfel , author S. Rinner , author K. Sandholzer , author A. Gritsch , author T. Chaneli \`e re , \ and\ author A. Reiserer ,\ 10.1002/qute.202400342 journal journal Advanced Quantum Technologies \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2400342 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202400342 2025

  76. [76]

    author author I. R. \ Berkman , author A. Lyasota , author G. G. \ de Boo , author J. G. \ Bartholomew , author S. Q. \ Lim , author B. C. \ Johnson , author J. C. \ McCallum , author B.-B. \ Xu , author S. Xie , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , author M. J. \ Sellars , author C. Yin , \ and\ author S. Rogge ,\ @...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    author author D. L. \ McAuslan , author J. G. \ Bartholomew , author M. J. \ Sellars , \ and\ author J. J. \ Longdell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032339 journal journal Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ volume 85 ,\ pages 032339 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.85.032339 2012

  78. [78]

    Yang , author W

    author author J. Yang , author W. Fan , author Y. Zhang , author C. Duan , author G. G. \ de Boo , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , author J. J. \ Longdell , author B. C. \ Johnson , author J. C. \ McCallum , author M. J. \ Sellars , author S. Rogge , author C. Yin , \ and\ author J. Du ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.235306 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 1...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.235306 2022

  79. [79]

    Ran c i \'c , author M

    author author M. Ran c i \'c , author M. P. \ Hedges , author R. L. \ Ahlefeldt , \ and\ author M. J. \ Sellars ,\ 10.1038/nphys4254 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 50 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4254 2018

  80. [80]

    author author N. Q. \ Vinh , author H. Przybyli \'n ska , author Z. F. \ Krasil'nik , \ and\ author T. Gregorkiewicz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.066401 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 90 ,\ pages 066401 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.066401 2003

Showing first 80 references.