pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04242 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

Active Galactic Nuclei-driven Metallicity Enrichment in the Interstellar Medium of Mrk 573

D.{\L}. Kr\'ol , P. Zhu , G. Fabbiano , M. Elvis , L.J. Kewley , N. Murray , R. Middei , A. Trindade-Falc\~ao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords AGNmetallicityMrk 573outflowsjetsSeyfertinterstellar mediumchemical enrichment
0
0 comments X

The pith

AGN activity enriches the gas around Mrk 573 with metals reaching several times solar abundance at 20-parsec scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps oxygen abundances in the nearby Seyfert 2 galaxy Mrk 573 using AGN-tuned strong-line diagnostics on Hubble and MUSE data. It finds clear metallicity enhancements in the AGN-dominated bicone, with values up to a few times solar, arranged in a patchy pattern that follows the radio jet and high-excitation zones. These enhancements appear without detectable star formation inside the bicone, pointing instead to metal delivery from the nucleus by winds, outflows, or jets. A reader would care because the result shows AGN feedback can directly alter the chemical composition of the interstellar medium on surprisingly small scales.

Core claim

The analysis shows metallicity enhancement in AGN-dominated regions of Mrk 573, with oxygen abundances reaching up to a few times solar. The distribution is patchy on ~100 pc scales, traces regions of high Seyfert/LINER index and the VLA 6 cm jet and radio lobes, and occurs where star-formation tracers are absent, indicating the metals are transported outward from the nuclear AGN by winds, outflows, or jets.

What carries the argument

AGN-specific strong-line metallicity diagnostics based on [O III], [S II], Hβ, Hα, and [N II] lines applied to spatially resolved HST narrow-band and MUSE integral-field data.

Load-bearing premise

The strong-line diagnostics calibrated on AGN photoionization models stay accurate at 20-parsec scales with negligible contamination from other ionization sources.

What would settle it

Finding young stars or H II regions with solar or lower metallicity inside the bicone would falsify the claim that the observed enrichment must come from nuclear transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04242 by A. Trindade-Falc\~ao, D.{\L}. Kr\'ol, G. Fabbiano, L.J. Kewley, M. Elvis, N. Murray, P. Zhu, R. Middei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SLI map and diagram for Mrk 573. Left panel: SLI map, with colors reflecting SLI values, i.e. the distance of each pixel from the Seyfert/LINER division line in the VO diagram. Black contours trace points on the Seyfert/LINER division line (SLI= 0). The black “X” marks the position of the nucleus. Right panel: corresponding VO diagram, with red indicating Seyfert-like excitation and blue denoting LINER-lik… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Metallicity (log (O/H) + 12) maps calculated for AGN-type regions, based on R1 (upper row) and R2 (lower row) metallicity diagnostics and assuming low (left panels) and high (right panels) nitrogen scaling relations. Black contours trace SLI value on the top-left panel, 6 cm radio jet/radio-lobes emission and soft (0.3-2.0 keV) Chandra X-ray emission in bottom-left panel. Dashed lines on the color scale ma… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first spatially resolved at $\sim20$ pc scale application of AGN-specific metallicity diagnostics for the nearby Compton-thick Seyfert 2 galaxy Mrk 573 ($z = 0.017$). We use Hubble Space Telescope narrow-band imaging, MUSE integral-field spectroscopy and apply AGN strong-line metallicity diagnostics based on [O III], [S II], H$\beta$, H$\alpha$, and [N II] emission lines. We construct maps of $12 + \log$(O/H) for two different metallicity calibrations and two different N/O-O/H scaling relations out to $\sim1$ kpc and down to $\sim20$ pc scales. Our analysis reveals metallicity enhancement in AGN-dominated regions, with oxygen abundances reaching up to few times Solar. The metallicity shows a patchy spatial distribution, varying on $\sim100$ pc scales, appears to trace the high Seyfert/LINER index (SLI) value regions and the VLA 6 cm jet/radio lobe emission. These spatial correspondences and the lack of evidence for star formation in the bicone region suggest that the enrichment originates from metals transported from the nuclear AGN regions by winds, outflows, or jets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first spatially resolved (~20 pc scale) application of AGN-specific strong-line metallicity diagnostics to the nearby Compton-thick Seyfert 2 galaxy Mrk 573 using HST narrow-band imaging and MUSE integral-field spectroscopy. It constructs 12+log(O/H) maps from two calibrations and two N/O-O/H relations, reports enhanced abundances (up to a few times solar) in AGN-dominated regions with patchy ~100 pc scale variations that correlate with high SLI values and the VLA 6 cm jet/radio lobes, and interprets this as evidence for metal transport from the nucleus via winds, outflows, or jets, citing the lack of star-formation tracers in the bicone.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies direct small-scale observational evidence that AGN activity can enrich the ISM on ~20-100 pc scales, with implications for feedback models in galaxy chemical evolution. The use of multiple calibrations and the resolved spatial correspondence with the radio jet are strengths that would strengthen the case for AGN-driven enrichment if robustness against alternative ionization mechanisms is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (metallicity maps and bicone analysis)] The central claim that observed metallicity patches trace AGN-driven metal transport requires that the adopted AGN photoionization calibrations return accurate 12+log(O/H) even in regions spatially coincident with the VLA 6 cm jet. Shock ionization from the jet can elevate [N II]/Hα and [S II]/Hα independently of abundance, producing the same line-ratio signature as high metallicity. The manuscript does not report explicit tests for shock contamination (e.g., [O I] λ6300/Hα maps or comparison with shock+photoionization grids) at the 20 pc scale where the jet–ISM interaction is resolved.
  2. [Methods and Results (calibration and N/O sections)] The two metallicity calibrations and two N/O-O/H scaling relations yield quantitatively different O/H outputs, yet the abstract and main text provide no error maps, dispersion statistics, or direct side-by-side comparison showing that the reported enhancement (few times solar) and spatial pattern remain robust across all four combinations.
  3. [Discussion and Abstract] The interpretation that enrichment originates from nuclear AGN regions relies on the absence of star-formation tracers in the bicone being complete enough to rule out local stellar enrichment. No quantitative comparison to star-formation models or explicit data-exclusion criteria for potential SF contamination are presented.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by briefly stating the specific calibrations and N/O relations employed and by noting the range of derived abundances rather than only the upper end.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and maps should include explicit uncertainty or error information where available, and ensure consistent color-bar scaling across the multiple calibration panels for direct visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that observed metallicity patches trace AGN-driven metal transport requires that the adopted AGN photoionization calibrations return accurate 12+log(O/H) even in regions spatially coincident with the VLA 6 cm jet. Shock ionization from the jet can elevate [N II]/Hα and [S II]/Hα independently of abundance, producing the same line-ratio signature as high metallicity. The manuscript does not report explicit tests for shock contamination (e.g., [O I] λ6300/Hα maps or comparison with shock+photoionization grids) at the 20 pc scale where the jet–ISM interaction is resolved.

    Authors: We agree that shock ionization from the jet could potentially mimic high-metallicity signatures in the line ratios. Although our analysis employs AGN-specific calibrations, we recognize the value of explicit validation. In the revised manuscript, we will add [O I] λ6300/Hα ratio maps and comparisons to shock+photoionization grids to assess and mitigate any contamination effects in the jet-affected regions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The two metallicity calibrations and two N/O-O/H scaling relations yield quantitatively different O/H outputs, yet the abstract and main text provide no error maps, dispersion statistics, or direct side-by-side comparison showing that the reported enhancement (few times solar) and spatial pattern remain robust across all four combinations.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the variation across calibrations. While the overall enhancement and spatial patterns are consistent, we will improve the presentation by including error maps, reporting dispersion statistics, and adding a direct comparison of the four combinations in the revised manuscript to demonstrate the robustness of our key findings. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The interpretation that enrichment originates from nuclear AGN regions relies on the absence of star-formation tracers in the bicone being complete enough to rule out local stellar enrichment. No quantitative comparison to star-formation models or explicit data-exclusion criteria for potential SF contamination are presented.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a more quantitative approach to ruling out star formation would strengthen the interpretation. In the revision, we will incorporate comparisons with star-formation models and define explicit criteria for excluding spaxels with potential SF contributions based on available tracers, ensuring the bicone analysis is more robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational mapping using external calibrations

full rationale

The paper applies published AGN photoionization-model calibrations to MUSE and HST emission-line maps to produce 12+log(O/H) distributions at 20-pc resolution. The central claim rests on observed spatial overlap between high-metallicity patches, high SLI values, and the VLA jet, plus absence of star-formation tracers; none of these steps reduces to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. Multiple independent calibrations and N/O scalings are used only for robustness checks, not to define the result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the validity of published AGN photoionization models for the chosen line ratios and on the completeness of star-formation tracers; no new entities are postulated and only standard calibration choices are varied.

free parameters (2)
  • Metallicity calibration selection
    Two different AGN strong-line calibrations are applied; each carries its own implicit zero-point and slope assumptions.
  • N/O versus O/H scaling relation
    Two alternative scaling relations are used to convert nitrogen line ratios into oxygen abundance.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AGN strong-line diagnostics based on [O III], [S II], Hβ, Hα, [N II] accurately recover 12 + log(O/H) in these regions
    Invoked when constructing the maps; assumes the calibrations remain valid at 20-pc scales without additional ionization sources.
  • domain assumption Absence of star-formation tracers in the bicone rules out local stellar enrichment
    Used to attribute the observed enhancement to AGN transport.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5554 in / 1522 out tokens · 73106 ms · 2026-05-15T16:17:38.509664+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652

    work page doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  2. [2]

    Lehmer, B. D. 2024, A&A, 689, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451168

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451168 2024

  3. [3]

    H., Lehmer, B

    Amiri, A., Knapen, J. H., Lehmer, B. D., & Khoram, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.12156, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.12156

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.12156 2025

  4. [4]

    G., et al

    Armah, M., Riffel, R., Dahmer-Hahn, L. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 2723, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2263 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collabora...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2263 2024

  5. [5]

    S., Ramsay S

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 773508, doi: 10.1117/12.856027

    work page doi:10.1117/12.856027 2010

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  7. [7]

    Begelman, M. C. 1999, in The Most Distant Radio Galaxies, ed. H. J. A. R¨ ottgering, P. N. Best, & M. D. Lehnert, 173

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 2236, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2160

    Bergemann, M., Hoppe, R., Semenova, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2236, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2160

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2160 2021

  9. [9]

    R., Mesa-Delgado A., L \'o pez-Mart \'i n L., Esteban C., 2011, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17847.x , 411, 2076

    Bianchi, S., Chiaberge, M., Evans, D. A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 553, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16475.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16475.x 2010

  10. [10]

    G., Stasi´ nska, G., & Bruzual, A

    Binette, L., Magris, C. G., Stasi´ nska, G., & Bruzual, A. G. 1994, A&A, 292, 13

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    2019, A&A, 628, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935829 Cano-D´ ıaz, M., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., et al

    Bittner, A., Falc´ on-Barroso, J., Nedelchev, B., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935829 Cano-D´ ıaz, M., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118358

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935829 2019

  12. [12]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3020 2017

  13. [13]

    2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    work page doi:10.1086/381875 2004

  14. [14]

    P., Dors, O

    Carvalho, S. P., Dors, O. L., Cardaci, M. V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5675, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa193

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa193 2020

  15. [15]

    S., Dors, O

    Castro, C. S., Dors, O. L., Cardaci, M. V., & H¨ agele, G. F. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1507, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx150

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx150 2017

  16. [16]

    W., McNamara, B

    Cavagnolo, K. W., McNamara, B. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1066, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1066

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1066 2010

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1086/300337 , journal =

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693, doi: 10.1086/300337 De Young, D. S. 1986, ApJ, 307, 62, doi: 10.1086/164393

    work page doi:10.1086/300337 1998

  18. [18]

    A., Ilha, G

    Deconto-Machado, A., Riffel, R. A., Ilha, G. S., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140613 do Nascimento, J. C., Dors, O. L., Storchi-Bergmann, T., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 807, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac771

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140613 2022

  19. [19]

    R., Koribalski B

    Done, C., Davis, S. W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1848, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x 2012

  20. [20]

    A., & Sutherland, R

    Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 1995, ApJ, 455, 468, doi: 10.1086/176596

    work page doi:10.1086/176596 1995

  21. [21]

    L., Maiolino, R., Cardaci, M

    Dors, O. L., Maiolino, R., Cardaci, M. V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1781

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1781 2020

  22. [22]

    L., Arellano-C´ ordova, K

    Dors, Jr., O. L., Arellano-C´ ordova, K. Z., Cardaci, M. V., & H¨ agele, G. F. 2017, MNRAS, 468, L113, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx036

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx036 2017

  23. [23]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 2828, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2386

    Du, P., Wang, J.-M., Hu, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2828, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2386

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2386 2014

  24. [24]

    J., Cantiello, M., Perna, R., & Samsing, J

    Samsing, J. 2025, ApJ, 981, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada896

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada896 2025

  25. [25]

    J., Ferland G

    Fabjan, D., Borgani, S., Tornatore, L., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1670, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15794.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15794.x 2010

  26. [26]

    C., Crenshaw, D

    Fischer, T. C., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Schmitt, H. R., & Trippe, M. L. 2010, AJ, 140, 577, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/577

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/577 2010

  27. [27]

    C., Machuca, C., Diniz, M

    Fischer, T. C., Machuca, C., Diniz, M. R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/30

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/30 2017

  28. [28]

    A., Perez Garcia, A

    Gonzalez-Martin, O., Acosta-Pulido, J. A., Perez Garcia, A. M., & Ramos Almeida, C. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1748, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1748

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/2/1748 2010

  29. [29]

    A., Dopita, M

    Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 2004, ApJS, 153, 75, doi: 10.1086/421114

    work page doi:10.1086/421114 2004

  30. [30]

    Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., & Perola, G. C. 2005, A&A, 444, 119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053643

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053643 2005

  31. [31]

    P., & Steiner, J

    Halpern, J. P., & Steiner, J. E. 1983, ApJL, 269, L37, doi: 10.1086/184051

    work page doi:10.1086/184051 1983

  32. [32]

    1999a, ARA&A, 37, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487 15 —

    Hamann, F., & Ferland, G. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487 1999

  33. [33]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  34. [34]

    T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L

    Ho, I. T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2030, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv067 8

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv067 2015

  35. [35]

    R., Koribalski B

    Jin, C., Ward, M., Done, C., & Gelbord, J. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x 2012

  36. [36]

    2006 , note =

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  37. [37]

    J., Nicholls D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  38. [38]

    C., Gitti, M., Cavagnolo, K

    Kirkpatrick, C. C., Gitti, M., Cavagnolo, K. W., et al. 2009, ApJL, 707, L69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/L69

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/1/l69 2009

  39. [39]

    B., Schmitt, H

    Kraemer, S. B., Schmitt, H. R., & Crenshaw, D. M. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1128, doi: 10.1086/587802 Kr´ ol, D. L., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.22447, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.22447

    work page doi:10.1086/587802 2008

  40. [40]

    P., Fabbiano, G., et al

    Ma, J., Maksym, W. P., Fabbiano, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcfc1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcfc1 2021

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2

    Maiolino, R., & Mannucci, F. 2019, A&A Rv, 27, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 2019

  42. [42]

    P., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al

    Maksym, W. P., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 46, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/46

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/46 2016

  43. [43]

    P., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al

    Maksym, W. P., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0976

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0976 2021

  44. [44]

    B., Dors, O., Zinchenko, I., et al

    Oliveira, C. B., Dors, O., Zinchenko, I., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e099, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.110

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.110 2024

  45. [45]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/39

    Paggi, A., Wang, J., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., & Karovska, M. 2012, ApJ, 756, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/39

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/39 2012

  46. [46]

    R., Mesa-Delgado A., L \'o pez-Mart \'i n L., Esteban C., 2011, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17847.x , 411, 2076

    Dotter, A. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2023, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16816.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16816.x 2010

  47. [47]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Revalski, M., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab107

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab107 2018

  48. [48]

    M., Polack, G

    Revalski, M., Crenshaw, D. M., Polack, G. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc131

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc131 2025

  49. [49]

    A., Dors, O

    Riffel, R. A., Dors, O. L., Armah, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, L54, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa194

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa194 2021

  50. [50]

    A., Colina, L., Costa-Souza, J

    Riffel, R. A., Colina, L., Costa-Souza, J. H., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556775

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556775 2026

  51. [51]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/23 2016

  52. [52]

    2009, A&A, 493, 409, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810225

    Simionescu, A., Werner, N., B¨ ohringer, H., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 409, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810225

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810225 2009

  53. [53]

    M., Haynes , M

    Springob, C. M., Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., & Kent, B. R. 2005, ApJS, 160, 149, doi: 10.1086/431550 Stasi´ nska, G., Vale Asari, N., Cid Fernandes, R., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, L29, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00550.x

    work page doi:10.1086/431550 2005

  54. [54]

    Kinney, A. L. 1998, AJ, 115, 909, doi: 10.1086/300242

    work page doi:10.1086/300242 1998

  55. [55]

    2018, MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1807.005 http://ascl.net/1807.005

    Sutherland, R., Dopita, M., Binette, L., & Groves, B. 2018, MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1807.005 http://ascl.net/1807.005

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    D., Groves, B

    Thomas, A. D., Groves, B. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 266, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/266

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/266 2016

  57. [57]

    D., Kewley, L

    Thomas, A. D., Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab08a1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab08a1 2019

  58. [58]

    The Origin of the Mass--Metallicity Relation: Insights from 53,000 Star-Forming Galaxies in the SDSS

    Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898, doi: 10.1086/423264 Trindade Falc˜ ao, A., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addc64

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/423264 2004

  59. [59]

    S., & Wilson, A

    Ulvestad, J. S., & Wilson, A. S. 1984, ApJ, 285, 439, doi: 10.1086/162520

    work page doi:10.1086/162520 1984

  60. [60]

    D., et al

    Vayner, A., D´ ıaz-Santos, T., Ferkinhoff, C. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.09870, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.09870

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09870 2025

  61. [61]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295, doi: 10.1086/191166 Villar Mart´ ın, M., L´ opez Cob´ a, C., Cazzoli, S., P´ erez

    work page doi:10.1086/191166 1987

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Montero, E., & Cabrera Lavers, A. 2024, A&A, 690, A397, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449621

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449621 2024

  63. [63]

    J., & Sutherland, R

    Zhu, P., Kewley, L. J., & Sutherland, R. S. 2023, ApJ, 954, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd757

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd757 2023

  64. [64]

    J., & Sutherland, R

    Zhu, P., Kewley, L. J., & Sutherland, R. S. 2024, ApJ, 977, 187, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8f37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8f37 2024

  65. [65]

    J., Sutherland, R

    Zhu, P., Kewley, L. J., Sutherland, R. S., & Grasha, K. 2025, ApJ, 988, 261, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade78f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade78f 2025