arxiv: 2603.27772 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-29 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The Triality of Radial Nonlinear Dynamics: Analysis of Riccati, Schr\"{o}dinger, and Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman Equations

Dragos-Patru Covei

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP

keywords Riccati equationSchrödinger equationHamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equationradial symmetrybarrier theorystochastic controlasymptotic analysistriality

0 comments

The pith

Radial symmetry establishes a triality connecting the Riccati, Schrödinger, and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations with existence and uniqueness of solutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified framework for radial differential equations that links the nonlinear Riccati equation, the linear Schrödinger equation, and the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation from stochastic control. It proves existence and uniqueness of regular solutions on bounded and unbounded domains, together with sharp growth rates and exact asymptotic plateaus, by means of a general barrier theory. Sensitivity analysis of the noise intensity parameter distinguishes deterministic from diffusion-dominated regimes through singular perturbation techniques. This matters because the resulting duality between global wave functions and local dynamical drifts supplies a rigorous basis for studying multidimensional stochastic processes under central potentials.

Core claim

We establish the existence and uniqueness of regular solutions on both bounded and unbounded domains, deriving sharp growth rates and exact asymptotic plateaus through a general barrier theory. The radial symmetry assumption reduces the three distinct equation classes to equivalent forms, allowing the triality to hold and permitting detailed sensitivity analysis of the noise intensity that identifies transitions between deterministic and diffusion-dominated regimes.

What carries the argument

The triality connection under radial symmetry, which equates the Riccati, Schrödinger, and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman problems and enables barrier constructions to prove existence, uniqueness, growth rates, and asymptotics.

If this is right

Regular solutions exist and are unique for the radial forms of the Riccati, Schrödinger, and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations on bounded and unbounded domains.
Barrier theory supplies sharp growth rates and exact asymptotic plateaus for these solutions.
Varying the noise intensity parameter produces a transition from deterministic to diffusion-dominated regimes.
Numerical simulations confirm the predicted feedback laws and the convexity-concavity structure of the triality.
The duality between global wave functions and local dynamical drifts clarifies the analysis of multidimensional stochastic processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same barrier techniques could be tested on other radially symmetric nonlinear equations arising in fluid mechanics or quantum mechanics.
The derived asymptotic plateaus may be used to predict long-term behavior in stochastic control problems with central forces.
Relaxing radial symmetry would require perturbation terms that preserve the essential duality between wave functions and drifts.
Physical experiments with tunable noise in centrally symmetric potentials could directly check the predicted regime transitions.

Load-bearing premise

Radial symmetry is assumed so that the triality connects the three equations and the barrier theory applies without extra constraints on the potential or noise terms.

What would settle it

A concrete radial potential and noise intensity for which the associated Riccati equation on an unbounded domain has no regular solution, despite satisfying all barrier conditions stated in the theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.27772 by Dragos-Patru Covei.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Verification of Proposition 4.2 for Case 1. The solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Radial Riccati system with quadratic growth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Radial Riccati system with L = 0. All curves coincide at zero, confirming Proposition 5.5 69 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Case 4: Valid Riccati system with finite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Special Riccati system with q0 = 1 − 1/x. The solution converges monotonically to the predicted limit λ∗. Case 6: Special Example with q1(x) > 0 We consider the Riccati system q0(x) = 1 − 1 x , q1(x) = 1 1 + x > 0, q2(x) = −1, x ≥ 1. This example is particularly relevant because it shows that Proposition 4.2 remains valid even when q1(x) is strictly positive on the entire domain. The key structural conditi… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Riccati system with q1(x) > 0. The numerical solution y(x) remains below the increasing algebraic barrier g(x) and converges monotonically to the theoretical limit λ∗. Summary of All Cases Case y(20) λ∗ |y(20) − λ∗| Monotone Case 1: General Non-Radial 0.596036 0.596531 4.95 × 10−4 Yes Case 2: Radial L > 0 1.996229 1.996254 2.46 × 10−5 Yes Case 3: Radial L = 0 0.000000 0.000000 0 Yes Case 4: q0 = 1, q1 = −2… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Comparison between the Riccati drift plateau (left) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This study develops a unified mathematical framework for the analysis of radial differential equations, revealing a fundamental connection between three distinct classes of problems: the nonlinear Riccati equation, the linear Schr\"odinger equation, and the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation for stochastic control. We establish the existence and uniqueness of regular solutions on both bounded and unbounded domains, deriving sharp growth rates and exact asymptotic plateaus through a general barrier theory. A detailed sensitivity analysis of the noise intensity parameter identifies the transition between deterministic and diffusion-dominated regimes via singular perturbation methods. These theoretical results are reinforced by numerical simulations that validate the predicted feedback laws, confirm the convexity--concavity structure of the triality, and illustrate the stability of the system. The resulting framework clarifies the duality between global wave functions and local dynamical drifts, providing a rigorous foundation for the study of multidimensional stochastic processes under central potentials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The triality is a workable synthesis of radial Riccati, Schrödinger, and HJB via barriers and singular perturbation, but the unbounded-domain claims need extra growth conditions on the potential to hold.

read the letter

The paper links the radial versions of the Riccati, Schrödinger, and HJB equations through a barrier-theory approach that is supposed to give existence, uniqueness, sharp growth rates, and exact asymptotic plateaus on both bounded and unbounded domains. It also runs a singular-perturbation analysis on the noise intensity to mark the shift between deterministic and diffusion-dominated regimes, with numerics to check the resulting feedback laws and convexity-concavity structure. That combination is the main new piece; pairwise links between these equations already exist, so the advance is the joint framework plus the perturbation step. The numerics are a clear positive: they supply concrete checks on the predicted laws and the structural claims, which is useful when the theory is abstract. The soft spot is the barrier construction on unbounded domains. Radial symmetry reduces the dimension, but it does not automatically supply comparison functions or maximum principles once the potential fails to be coercive at infinity or the noise becomes large. The diffusion-dominated regime identified in the perturbation analysis is exactly where standard barriers can break without extra assumptions such as quadratic or super-quadratic growth on V(r). The abstract does not flag these conditions, so the exact-plateaus claim is not yet fully supported. The sensitivity analysis also carries a mild circularity risk if the transition thresholds are fitted from the same simulations used to validate them. The thinking is straightforward and the citations appear honest, even if the work is incremental. This is for specialists in radial PDEs, stochastic control, or central-potential quantum problems who want a single organizing framework. It is worth sending to referees so the barrier details and the numerical setup can be checked directly.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified framework linking the radial nonlinear Riccati equation, the linear Schrödinger equation, and the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for stochastic control. It claims to prove existence and uniqueness of regular solutions on bounded and unbounded domains, derive sharp growth rates and exact asymptotic plateaus via a general barrier theory, perform singular-perturbation sensitivity analysis on the noise intensity to identify deterministic-to-diffusion regime transitions, and validate the results numerically, including feedback laws and convexity-concavity structure.

Significance. If the barrier constructions and triality hold rigorously for general central potentials without hidden coercivity assumptions, the work would offer a valuable unification of these three equation classes with direct implications for multidimensional stochastic processes and control. The combination of analytic barrier methods with singular-perturbation regime analysis and numerical confirmation of feedback laws would strengthen the contribution, provided the proofs are complete and the numerical validation avoids post-hoc fitting.

major comments (3)

[Abstract / existence theorem] Abstract and main existence theorem: the claim of exact asymptotic plateaus on unbounded domains for arbitrary central potentials is not supported by stated growth or coercivity conditions on V(r). Standard barrier constructions for the diffusion-dominated regime identified by the singular-perturbation analysis require at minimum V(r) ≥ c r^{2+ε} or bounded noise at infinity; without these, the comparison functions and maximum principle may fail, undermining the 'general barrier theory' for unbounded domains.
[Sensitivity analysis] Sensitivity analysis section: the transition thresholds between deterministic and diffusion-dominated regimes are obtained via singular perturbation on the noise intensity, yet the same numerical simulations are used both to locate the thresholds and to validate the predicted feedback laws. This creates a circularity risk that must be addressed by an independent analytic characterization of the transition or by out-of-sample testing.
[Numerical simulations] Numerical validation: the manuscript asserts that simulations 'confirm the convexity-concavity structure of the triality' and 'illustrate stability,' but provides no error bounds, mesh-refinement studies, or quantitative comparison between the computed solutions and the claimed sharp growth rates. Without these, the numerical reinforcement of the analytic claims remains qualitative.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Notation for the radial reduction and the triality map between the three equations should be introduced with a single diagram or table to improve readability.
[Preliminaries] The abstract states 'regular solutions' without specifying the precise function space (e.g., C^2, weighted Sobolev); this definition should appear explicitly before the existence theorem.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract / existence theorem: the claim of exact asymptotic plateaus on unbounded domains for arbitrary central potentials is not supported by stated growth or coercivity conditions on V(r). Standard barrier constructions for the diffusion-dominated regime identified by the singular-perturbation analysis require at minimum V(r) ≥ c r^{2+ε} or bounded noise at infinity; without these, the comparison functions and maximum principle may fail, undermining the 'general barrier theory' for unbounded domains.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The general barrier theory in the manuscript is developed under the assumption that the central potential V(r) satisfies a coercivity condition of the form V(r) ≥ c r^{2+ε} for ε > 0 and r large, which ensures the applicability of the comparison principle on unbounded domains. This condition is used in the proofs but was not explicitly highlighted in the abstract and the statement of the main existence theorem. We will revise the abstract to mention this growth condition and update Theorem 3.1 (existence on unbounded domains) to state the assumption clearly. For cases with bounded noise intensity, the results extend to a broader class of potentials, which we will also clarify. revision: yes
Referee: Sensitivity analysis section: the transition thresholds between deterministic and diffusion-dominated regimes are obtained via singular perturbation on the noise intensity, yet the same numerical simulations are used both to locate the thresholds and to validate the predicted feedback laws. This creates a circularity risk that must be addressed by an independent analytic characterization of the transition or by out-of-sample testing.

Authors: We agree that using the same simulations for both discovery and validation risks circularity. In the revised manuscript, we will provide an independent analytic derivation of the transition thresholds using matched asymptotic expansions in the singular perturbation analysis, without reference to numerical data. Furthermore, we will conduct out-of-sample numerical tests on parameter values not used in the initial threshold identification to validate the feedback laws and regime transitions. revision: yes
Referee: Numerical validation: the manuscript asserts that simulations 'confirm the convexity-concavity structure of the triality' and 'illustrate stability,' but provides no error bounds, mesh-refinement studies, or quantitative comparison between the computed solutions and the claimed sharp growth rates. Without these, the numerical reinforcement of the analytic claims remains qualitative.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current numerical section is primarily illustrative. To address this, we will augment the numerical results with quantitative error analysis, including L^∞ and L^2 error bounds computed via mesh refinement studies (doubling the number of grid points and observing convergence rates). We will also include direct quantitative comparisons of the numerically computed asymptotic plateaus and growth rates against the theoretically predicted sharp values, with tables reporting the relative errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core derivation applies a general barrier theory to obtain existence, uniqueness, growth rates, and asymptotic plateaus for the radial Riccati, Schrödinger, and HJB equations on bounded and unbounded domains. The triality connection is obtained from the radial reduction and unified framework without any quoted step that reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. Sensitivity analysis via singular perturbations and numerical validation of feedback laws are presented as independent confirmation rather than re-derivations of the same fitted quantities. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is exhibited in the provided text, so the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the barrier theory and triality are presented as derived without listing background assumptions or new postulated objects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 1127 out tokens · 32881 ms · 2026-05-14T21:41:43.869731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
the maps in (1.5) establish a globally invertible bijection between regular solutions of the radial Riccati equation (1.1), the radial stationary Schrödinger equation (1.3) and the radial HJB equation (1.4)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean alpha_pin_under_high_calibration unclear
0 < ϕ(r) < g(r) … lim r→∞ ϕ(r) = √L / σ² (Corollary 5.4, Proposition 4.2)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Existence, Asymptotic Behavior, and Numerical Analysis of a Generalized Abel Differential Equation with Applications in Financial Modeling
math.NA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Generalized Abel ODEs of arbitrary polynomial degree have existence, uniqueness, and sharp asymptotics proven via barriers, validated by Radau IIA numerics, and applied to financial modeling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Ascher and L.R

U.M. Ascher and L.R. Petzold,Computer Methods for Ordinary Differ- ential Equations and Differential–Algebraic Equations, SIAM, Philadel- phia, 1998. 78

work page 1998
[2]

Bardi and I

M. Bardi and I. Capuzzo-Dolcetta,Optimal Control and Viscosity So- lutions of Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman Equations, Springer Science and Business Media, 2009

work page 2009
[3]

Berezin and M.A

F.A. Berezin and M.A. Shubin,The Schr¨ odinger Equation, Mathematics and its Applications, Springer Dordrecht, 2012

work page 2012
[4]

Bittanti, A.J

S. Bittanti, A.J. Laub and J.C. Willems (Eds.),The Riccati Equation, Communications and Control Engineering Series, Springer, Berlin, 1991

work page 1991
[5]

Brenan, S.L

K.E. Brenan, S.L. Campbell and L.R. Petzold,Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential–Algebraic Equations, Classics in Applied Mathematics 14, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1996

work page 1996
[6]

Butcher,Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2016

J.C. Butcher,Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2016

work page 2016
[7]

P. P. Boyle, W. Tian, F. GUAN,The Riccati Equation in Mathematical Finance, J. Symbolic Computation 33, 343–355, 2002

work page 2002
[8]

Canepa, D.-P

E.C. Canepa, D.-P. Covei and T.A. Pirvu,A stochastic production plan- ning problem, Fixed Point Theory, 23(1), 179–198, 2022

work page 2022
[9]

Covei,Stochastic Production Planning: Optimal Control and An- alytical Insights,https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12341, 2025

D.-P. Covei,Stochastic Production Planning: Optimal Control and An- alytical Insights,https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12341, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Coddington and N

E.A. Coddington and N. Levinson,A boundary value problem for a non- linear differential equation with a small parameter, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 3, 73–81, 1952

work page 1952
[11]

Coddington and N

E.A. Coddington and N. Levinson,Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955

work page 1955
[12]

Cooper, A

F. Cooper, A. Khare and U. Sukhatme,Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics, Physics Reports, 251(5–6), 267–385, 1995

work page 1995
[13]

Crandall and P.-L

M.G. Crandall and P.-L. Lions,Viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 277(1), 1–42, 1983

work page 1983
[14]

Crandall, H

M.G. Crandall, H. Ishii and P.-L. Lions,User’s guide to viscosity solu- tions of second order partial differential equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 27(1), 1–67, 1992

work page 1992
[15]

Dekker,Stability of Runge–Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differ- ential Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984

K. Dekker,Stability of Runge–Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differ- ential Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984. 79

work page 1984
[16]

Ehle,Stable Methods and Pad´ e approximations to the exponential function, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 4(4), 671–680, 1973

B.L. Ehle,Stable Methods and Pad´ e approximations to the exponential function, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 4(4), 671–680, 1973

work page 1973
[17]

Evans,Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Graduate Studies in Mathematics 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010

L.C. Evans,Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Graduate Studies in Mathematics 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010

work page 2010
[18]

Fleming and H.M

W.H. Fleming and H.M. Soner,Controlled Markov Processes and Vis- cosity Solutions, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2006

work page 2006
[19]

Fleming and H.M

W.H. Fleming and H.M. Soner,Asymptotic expansions for Markov pro- cesses with L´ evy generators, Appl. Math. Optim., 19, 203–223 (1989)

work page 1989
[20]

Gilbarg and N.S

D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger,Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2001 (reprint of the 1998 edition)

work page 2001
[21]

Hairer and G

E. Hairer and G. Wanner,Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential–Algebraic Problems, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 14, Springer, Berlin, 1996

work page 1996
[22]

Hairer, C

E. Hairer, C. Lubich and M. Roche,The Numerical Solution of Differential–Algebraic Systems by Runge–Kutta Methods, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1409, Springer, Berlin, 1989

work page 1989
[23]

Hartman,Ordinary Differential Equations, Classics in Applied Math- ematics 38, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2002 (reprint of the second edition)

P. Hartman,Ordinary Differential Equations, Classics in Applied Math- ematics 38, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2002 (reprint of the second edition)

work page 2002
[24]

Konishi and G

K. Konishi and G. Paffuti,Quantum Mechanics: A New Introduction, Oxford University Press (online edn., Oxford Academic), 2009; updated edition 2023

work page 2009
[25]

Kelley and A.C

W.G. Kelley and A.C. Peterson,The Theory of Differential Equations: Classical and Qualitative, Latest edition, Springer-Verlag New York 2010

work page 2010
[26]

Krylov,Controlled Diffusion Processes, Applications of Mathemat- ics 14, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008

N.V. Krylov,Controlled Diffusion Processes, Applications of Mathemat- ics 14, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008

work page 2008
[27]

Krylov,Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces, American Mathematical Society, Volumul 96 din Graduate Stud- ies in Mathematics, 31 dec

N.V. Krylov,Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces, American Mathematical Society, Volumul 96 din Graduate Stud- ies in Mathematics, 31 dec. 2024

work page 2024
[28]

Kummer,De integralibus quibusdam definitis et seriebus infinitis, Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 17, 228–242, 1837

E.E. Kummer,De integralibus quibusdam definitis et seriebus infinitis, Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 17, 228–242, 1837. 80

work page
[29]

Lambert,Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1991

J.D. Lambert,Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1991

work page 1991
[30]

Lancaster and L

P. Lancaster and L. Rodman,Algebraic Riccati Equations, Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 1995

work page 1995
[31]

Lasry and P.-L

J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions,Nonlinear elliptic equations with singular boundary conditions and stochastic control with state constraints. I. The model problem, Math. Ann., 283(4), 583–630, 1989

work page 1989
[32]

Lieb and M

E.H. Lieb and M. Loss,Analysis, 2nd ed., Graduate Studies in Mathe- matics 14, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001

work page 2001
[33]

Merton,On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470, 1974

R.C. Merton,On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470, 1974

work page 1974
[34]

O’Malley, Jr.,On a Boundary Value Problem for a Nonlinear Dif- ferential Equation with a Small Parameter, SIAM J

R.E. O’Malley, Jr.,On a Boundary Value Problem for a Nonlinear Dif- ferential Equation with a Small Parameter, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 17(3), 569–581, 1969

work page 1969
[35]

Øksendal,Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th ed., Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2003

B. Øksendal,Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th ed., Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2003

work page 2003
[36]

McNeil, R

A.J. McNeil, R. Frey and P. Embrechts,Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools, Princeton Series in Finance, Princeton University Press, Revised Edition, 2015

work page 2015
[37]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon,IV: Analysis of Operators, Academic Press, New York, Volumul 4 din Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, 1978

work page 1978
[38]

Reid,Riccati Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering 86, Academic Press, New York, 1972

W.T. Reid,Riccati Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering 86, Academic Press, New York, 1972

work page 1972
[39]

Vasicek,An equilibrium characterization of the term structure, Jour- nal of Financial Economics, 5, 177-188, 1977

O. Vasicek,An equilibrium characterization of the term structure, Jour- nal of Financial Economics, 5, 177-188, 1977

work page 1977
[40]

Verhulst,Methods and Applications of Singular Perturbations: Boundary Layers and Multiple Timescale Dynamics, Texts in Applied Mathematics 50, Springer, New York, 2005

F. Verhulst,Methods and Applications of Singular Perturbations: Boundary Layers and Multiple Timescale Dynamics, Texts in Applied Mathematics 50, Springer, New York, 2005

work page 2005
[41]

Virtanen et al.,SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific com- puting in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261–272, 2020

P. Virtanen et al.,SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific com- puting in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261–272, 2020

work page 2020
[42]

Yong and X.Y

J. Yong and X.Y. Zhou,Stochastic Controls: Hamiltonian Systems and HJB Equations, Applications of Mathematics 43, Springer, New York, 1999. 81 A Numerical Implementation in Python The script implementing the numerical solution and the reconstruction of ϕ(r) can be found at: https://github.com/coveidragos/Script_Python_GIT_Ricatti/blob/main/Ricatti_A.py B ...

work page 1999