arxiv: 2604.02191 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Jahn-Teller distortion on strained La₃Ni₂O₇ thin films

Yuxin Wang , Zhan Wang , Fu-Chun Zhang , Kun Jiang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

keywords Jahn-Teller distortionstrained La3Ni2O7bilayer nickelatessuperconductivity tuningapical Ni-O bondFermi surfaceHall responseARPES

0 comments

The pith

Biaxial compressive strain in La3Ni2O7 thin films enhances the Jahn-Teller splitting as the main microscopic tuning parameter for superconductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the electronic structure of strained La3Ni2O7 thin films and shows that compressive strain primarily elongates the outer apical Ni-O bond while the inner apical bond stays nearly fixed. This strongly increases the Jahn-Teller splitting but leaves the interlayer dz2 hopping almost unchanged. Because superconductivity is thought to appear only below a critical in-plane lattice constant, the enhanced splitting emerges as the key control variable. Calculations of Fermi surfaces and Hall responses on LaAlO3 and SrLaAlO4 substrates match ARPES and Hall data, supporting the role of Jahn-Teller distortion in optimizing superconductivity in bilayer nickelates.

Core claim

Biaxial compressive strain mainly elongates the outer apical Ni-O bond, strongly enhancing the Jahn-Teller splitting Δ_JT while the interlayer d_z² hopping t_⊥^z changes only weakly. Since superconductivity emerges only below a critical in-plane lattice constant, the strain-enhanced Δ_JT is identified as the relevant microscopic tuning parameter. The calculated Fermi surfaces and Hall responses for LaAlO3 and SrLaAlO4 substrates agree with ARPES and Hall measurements, confirming Jahn-Teller distortion as a central tuning parameter in strained La3Ni2O7.

What carries the argument

The Jahn-Teller splitting Δ_JT, the energy splitting from strain-induced elongation of the outer apical Ni-O bond, which grows strongly under compression while interlayer hopping stays nearly constant.

If this is right

The strain-enhanced Jahn-Teller splitting controls superconductivity rather than changes in interlayer hopping.
Fermi surfaces calculated for specific substrates match ARPES data on LaAlO3 and SrLaAlO4.
Hall responses from the same calculations match experimental measurements.
Jahn-Teller distortion serves as the central mechanism for optimizing superconductivity in bilayer nickelates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar strain tuning of Jahn-Teller splitting could apply to other nickelate families if the critical-lattice-constant assumption generalizes.
Measuring the outer apical bond length directly under strain would provide a testable link to the calculated splitting.
If Δ_JT proves dominant, targeted chemical substitutions that mimic the bond elongation could stabilize superconductivity without external strain.

Load-bearing premise

Superconductivity appears only below a critical in-plane lattice constant.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing superconductivity persisting above the critical in-plane lattice constant without corresponding increase in Δ_JT, or a mismatch between calculated and measured Hall response under varying strain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02191 by Fu-Chun Zhang, Kun Jiang, Yuxin Wang, Zhan Wang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Variation of the bond lengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (b) show Fermi surface for SLAO and LAO substrate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Variation of the bond lengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of the electronic structure of strained La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films. We show that biaxial compressive strain mainly elongates the outer apical Ni-O bond while leaving the inner apical Ni-O bond nearly unchanged. As a result, the Jahn-Teller splitting $\Delta_{JT}$ is strongly enhanced, whereas the interlayer $d_{z^2}$ hopping $t_\perp^z$ changes only weakly. Since superconductivity is widely believed to emerge only below a critical in-plane lattice constant, our results identify the strain-enhanced $\Delta_{JT}$ as the relevant microscopic tuning parameter. Consistently, the calculated Fermi surfaces and Hall response for LaAlO$_3$ and SrLaAlO$_4$ substrates agree with ARPES and Hall measurements. Our results identify Jahn-Teller distortion as a key tuning parameter in strained La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ and support its central role in optimizing superconductivity in bilayer nickelates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper argues that compressive strain in La3Ni2O7 films enhances Jahn-Teller splitting through outer apical bond elongation, positioning this as the key superconductivity tuner over generic lattice compression, with calculations matching ARPES and Hall data.

read the letter

The main thing to take away is that compressive strain in La3Ni2O7 films stretches the outer apical Ni-O bond while the inner one stays almost the same. This boosts the Jahn-Teller splitting Δ_JT, which the authors argue is the real microscopic control for superconductivity, not just shrinking the in-plane lattice spacing. The interlayer hopping changes only weakly. They do well by showing that the Fermi surfaces and Hall response from their calculations line up with ARPES and Hall measurements on LaAlO3 and SrLaAlO4 substrates. That agreement is a useful check on the model. The new element is pinning the strain benefit on this specific bond distortion and the resulting Δ_JT increase. It refines earlier ideas about lattice compression by pointing to the Jahn-Teller effect as the key. The soft spot is the reliance on the idea that superconductivity only kicks in below some critical in-plane lattice constant. They use that to say Δ_JT is what matters. If that assumption doesn't hold up or if other effects dominate, the conclusion weakens. Also, the abstract is light on method details like how they did the calculations or checked convergence, though the full paper likely covers it. The stress test note is fair on this point. This is for people in the nickelate thin film field who are trying to engineer better superconductivity through strain. A reader working on similar materials would find the bond-specific analysis helpful. I'd send it to peer review. The match to experiment gives it enough grounding to be worth referee time, even if revisions are needed to strengthen the link to superconductivity.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a systematic study of the electronic structure of strained La₃Ni₂O₇ thin films. It reports that biaxial compressive strain primarily elongates the outer apical Ni-O bond while leaving the inner apical Ni-O bond nearly unchanged, resulting in strong enhancement of the Jahn-Teller splitting Δ_JT with only weak variation in the interlayer d_{z²} hopping t_⊥^z. The authors identify the strain-enhanced Δ_JT as the relevant microscopic tuning parameter for superconductivity, based on the premise that superconductivity emerges only below a critical in-plane lattice constant. They further state that the calculated Fermi surfaces and Hall response for LaAlO₃ and SrLaAlO₄ substrates agree with ARPES and Hall measurements.

Significance. If the underlying calculations are robust and the identification of Δ_JT holds, the work would provide a concrete microscopic link between strain-induced structural changes and electronic tuning in bilayer nickelates, potentially explaining why superconductivity optimizes under specific compressive strains and offering a parameter that can be targeted in future material design.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that strain-enhanced Δ_JT is the relevant tuning parameter rests directly on the statement 'Since superconductivity is widely believed to emerge only below a critical in-plane lattice constant'. No independent test, additional calculation, or explicit comparison to other strain effects (e.g., changes in in-plane hopping or charge transfer) is supplied to establish that Δ_JT dominates over alternative mechanisms.
[Abstract] Abstract: The abstract asserts that 'the calculated Fermi surfaces and Hall response ... agree with ARPES and Hall measurements' but supplies no information on the computational method, functional, convergence criteria, k-mesh, or the precise procedure used to extract Δ_JT and t_⊥^z from the band structure. These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported consistency is robust or parameter-dependent.

minor comments (1)

The title is slightly imprecise; 'Jahn-Teller distortion in strained La₃Ni₂O₇ thin films' would better reflect the content.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the two major points raised below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that strain-enhanced Δ_JT is the relevant tuning parameter rests directly on the statement 'Since superconductivity is widely believed to emerge only below a critical in-plane lattice constant'. No independent test, additional calculation, or explicit comparison to other strain effects (e.g., changes in in-plane hopping or charge transfer) is supplied to establish that Δ_JT dominates over alternative mechanisms.

Authors: The manuscript's identification of Δ_JT follows directly from the calculated structural response: biaxial compression elongates the outer apical Ni-O bond while the inner apical bond remains nearly fixed, producing a large increase in Δ_JT with only weak variation in t_⊥^z. This differential effect is shown explicitly in the relaxed structures and band dispersions. Because the critical in-plane lattice constant is an established experimental boundary below which superconductivity appears, the parameter that changes most strongly with strain in this regime is the relevant tuning knob. We do not claim to have performed an exhaustive comparison against every conceivable alternative (e.g., charge-transfer shifts), but the calculations already demonstrate that in-plane hopping and interlayer dispersion are far less sensitive than Δ_JT under the strains considered. We will add a short clarifying sentence in the revised abstract and main text to make this structural selectivity explicit. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract asserts that 'the calculated Fermi surfaces and Hall response ... agree with ARPES and Hall measurements' but supplies no information on the computational method, functional, convergence criteria, k-mesh, or the precise procedure used to extract Δ_JT and t_⊥^z from the band structure. These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported consistency is robust or parameter-dependent.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is too concise to contain full technical specifications. All computational details—DFT functional, plane-wave cutoff, k-mesh density, convergence thresholds, and the exact definitions used to extract Δ_JT (energy splitting between d_{x²-y²} and d_{z²} bands) and t_⊥^z (interlayer bandwidth)—are provided in the Methods section and are used consistently for the Fermi-surface and Hall calculations shown in the figures. The agreement with ARPES and Hall data is therefore based on the same converged setup. To address the concern, we will insert a brief parenthetical reference to the Methods section in the revised abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation of strain effects on Δ_JT is independent of the tuning-parameter identification

full rationale

The paper performs structural relaxation under biaxial strain to show elongation of the outer apical Ni-O bond (inner bond unchanged), directly yielding enhanced Δ_JT with weak t_⊥^z variation. This structural-electronic mapping is computed from the input lattice constants and does not presuppose the superconductivity conclusion. The subsequent claim that strain-enhanced Δ_JT is the relevant tuning parameter rests on the external premise 'superconductivity is widely believed to emerge only below a critical in-plane lattice constant,' which is not derived, fitted, or self-cited within the work. Fermi-surface and Hall-response calculations for specific substrates are compared to ARPES/Hall data, providing an independent consistency check on the electronic model rather than a self-referential loop. No self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation reductions occur in the load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Standard DFT assumptions for electronic structure are implicitly used but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1097 out tokens · 34462 ms · 2026-05-13T20:31:57.776336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Since superconductivity is widely believed to emerge only below a critical in-plane lattice constant, our results identify the strain-enhanced Δ_JT as the relevant microscopic tuning parameter.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the Jahn–Teller splitting Δ_JT is strongly enhanced, whereas the interlayer d_z2 hopping t_⊥^z changes only weakly

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Orbital-Selective $d$-wave Superconductivity in the Two-Band $t$-$J$ Model: Possible Applications to La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$
cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Orbital-selective d-wave superconductivity arises exclusively from the itinerant orbital in the two-band t-J model, suppressed by local inter-orbital bound states from the quasi-localized orbital.
Superconductivity in bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$: A review focusing on the strong-coupling Hund's rule assisted pairing mechanism
cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 arises from interlayer Cooper pairs of 3d_x2-y2 electrons driven by effective J_perp from Hund-assisted AFM exchange transfer, while localized 3d_z2 electrons form rung singlets that prod...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

[1]

The main contrast between the two substrates are the emergence ofγpocket highlighted in LAO

is plotted as black dots in (a). The main contrast between the two substrates are the emergence ofγpocket highlighted in LAO. (c) The Hall coefficient obtained from the two substrates as a function of quasiparticle scattering rateΓ. The dashed line show the Hall coeffi- cient from experimental measurements at 160K [61]. (d) Schematic illustration of the l...

work page 2021
[2]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y . Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Nature621, 493 (2023)

work page 2023
[3]

E. K. Ko, Y . Yu, Y . Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V . Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y . Wang, Y . Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y . Hwang, Nature638, 935 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y . Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y . Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Nature634, 579 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, Y . Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y .-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Nature640, 641 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Chen, National Science Review12, nwaf373 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Wang, H.-H

M. Wang, H.-H. Wen, T. Wu, D.-X. Yao, and T. Xiang, Chinese Physics Letters41, 077402 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Zhang, D

Y . Zhang, D. Su, Y . Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y . Xu, Y . Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, Nature Physics20, 1269 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y . D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y . Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y . Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Physical Review X14, 011040 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, and M. Wang, National Science Review 12, nwaf220 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y . Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Nature Physics21, 1780 (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y . Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y .-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y . Wang, Y . Liu, T. Luo, N. Hirao, T. Mat- suoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Nature649, 871 (2026)

work page 2026
[13]

M. Shi, D. Peng, Y . Li, S. Yang, Z. Xing, Y . Wang, K. Fan, H. Li, R. Wu, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Nature Communications16, 9141 (2025)

work page 2025
[14]

Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y . Lu, M. Wang, Y . Wang, and Z. Chen, Nature630, 847 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Z. Dong, G. Wang, N. Wang, W.-H. Dong, L. Gu, Y . Xu, J. Cheng, Z. Chen, and Y . Wang, Nature Materials24, 1927 (2025)

work page 1927
[16]

Z.-Y . Cao, D. Peng, S. Choi, F. Lan, L. Yu, E. Zhang, Z. Xing, Y . Liu, F. Zhang, T. Luo, L. Chen, V . T. A. Hong, S.-Y . Paek, H. Jang, J. Xie, H. Liu, H. Lou, Z. Zeng, Y . Ding, J. Zhao, C. Liu, T. Park, Q. Zeng, and H. kwang Mao, (2025), arXiv:2509.12606 [cond-mat.supr-con]

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

J. Guo, Y . Chen, Y . Wang, H. Sun, D. Hu, M. Wang, X. Huang, and T. Cui, (2025), arXiv:2509.12601 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

S. V . Mandyam, E. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Chen, N. C. Jayarama, A. Gupta, E. A. Riesel, V . I. Levitas, C. R. Laumann, and N. Y . Yao, Nature651, 54 (2026)

work page 2026
[19]

Y . Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y . Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y . Gu, Y . Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y . Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J.-g. Guo, and J. Zhao, Nature631, 531 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

Zhang, C

M. Zhang, C. Pei, D. Peng, X. Du, W. Hu, Y . Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y . Li, H. Liu, C. Wen, J. Song, Y . Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, N. Yu, P. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Y . Chen, C. Jin, H. Guo, C. Wu, F. Yang, Q. Zeng, S. Yan, L. Yang, and Y . Qi, Physical Review X15, 021005 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Li, Y .-J

Q. Li, Y .-J. Zhang, Z.-N. Xiang, Y . Zhang, X. Zhu, and H.-H. Wen, Chinese Physics Letters41, 017401 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W ´u, and D.-X. Yao, Physical Re- view Letters131, 126001 (2023)

work page 2023
[23]

Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Physical Review B108, L140505 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Yang, G.-M

Y .-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Physical Review B 108, L201108 (2023)

work page 2023
[25]

Liu, J.-W

Y .-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Physical Review Letters131, 236002 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Lechermann, J

F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B ¨otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Physi- cal Review B108, L201121 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y . Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Physical Review B108, 214522 (2023)

work page 2023
[28]

Jiang, Z

K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F.-C. Zhang, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 017402 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Fan, J.-F

Z. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X.-Y . Jiang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Physical Review B110, 024514 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Physical Review Letters 132, 146002 (2024)

work page 2024
[31]

Sakakibara, N

H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review Letters132, 106002 (2024)

work page 2024
[32]

Qu, D.-W

X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Physical Review Letters132, 036502 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

Xue and F

J.-R. Xue and F. Wang, Chinese Physics Letters41, 057403 (2024)

work page 2024
[34]

S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Physical Review Letters 133, 096002 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

Y . Wang, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu, Physical Review B110, 205122 (2024)

work page 2024
[36]

Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, and K. Jiang, Chinese Physics B34, 047105 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Y . Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Zhang, K. Jiang, and J. Hu, (2025), arXiv:2501.08536 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Jiang, Y .-H

K.-Y . Jiang, Y .-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y . Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Physical Review Letters134, 076001 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

J. Zhan, Y . Gu, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Physical Review Letters134, 136002 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Y . Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Physical Review B 111, 174506 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

Wang, H.-J

Z. Wang, H.-J. Zhang, K. Jiang, and F.-C. Zhang, National Sci- ence Review12, nwaf353 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

Z. Wang, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, and F.-C. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2512.12734 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Xi, S.-L

W. Xi, S.-L. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Physical Review B111, 104505 6 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Y .-M. Wu, T. Helbig, S. V . Smailagi ´c, H.-X. Wang, Y . Yu, H. Y . Hwang, and S. Raghu, (2026), arXiv:2602.20288 [cond- mat.supr-con]

work page arXiv 2026
[45]

Geisler, J

B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Physical Review B112, L100506 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

Zhao and A

Y .-F. Zhao and A. S. Botana, Physical Review B111, 115154 (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

C. Le, J. Zhan, X. Wu, and J. Hu, (2025), arXiv:2501.14665 [cond-mat.supr-con]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

X. Hu, W. Qiu, C.-Q. Chen, Z. Luo, and D.-X. Yao, Communi- cations Physics8, 506 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

Yue, J.-J

C. Yue, J.-J. Miao, H. Huang, Y . Hua, P. Li, Y . Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Q. Yang, F. Yang, H. Sun, Y .-J. Sun, J. Lin, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and W.-Q. Chen, National Science Review12, nwaf253 (2025)

work page 2025
[50]

Kaneko, M

T. Kaneko, M. Kakoi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review B112, 075143 (2025)

work page 2025
[51]

Khaliullin and J

G. Khaliullin and J. Chaloupka, (2025), 2506.16360 [cond- mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Inoue, Y

D. Inoue, Y . Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, (2025), arXiv:2503.12925 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

B. Hao, M. Wang, W. Sun, Y . Yang, Z. Mao, S. Yan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Ji, and Y . Nie, Nature Materials24, 1756 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

Osada, C

M. Osada, C. Terakura, A. Kikkawa, M. Nakajima, H.-Y . Chen, Y . Nomura, Y . Tokura, and A. Tsukazaki, Communications Physics8, 251 (2025)

work page 2025
[55]

Y . Liu, E. K. Ko, Y . Tarn, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V . Thampy, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, S. Raghu, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, Na- ture Materials24, 1221 (2025)

work page 2025
[56]

Bhatt, E

L. Bhatt, E. Abarca Morales, A. Y . Jiang, E. K. Ko, Y .-F. Zhao, N. Schnitzer, G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, Y . Liu, Y . Yu, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, H. Y . Hwang, J. A. Mundy, D. A. Muller, and B. H. Goodge, Nature 10.1038/s41586-026-10446- 2 (2026)

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10446- 2026
[57]

P. Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Y . Li, C. Yue, H. Huang, L. Xu, J. Shen, Y . Miao, W. Song, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, H. Wang, W. Chen, Y . Huang, Z.-H. Chen, T. Qian, J. Lin, J. He, Y .-J. Sun, Z. Chen, and Q.-K. Xue, National Science Review , nwaf205 (2025)

work page 2025
[58]

B. Y . Wang, Y . Zhong, S. Abadi, Y . Liu, Y . Yu, X. Zhang, Y .-M. Wu, R. Wang, J. Li, Y . Tarn, E. K. Ko, V . Thampy, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y . S. Lee, T. P. Devereaux, C. Jia, H. Y . Hwang, and Z.-X. Shen, (2025), arXiv:2504.16372 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

W. Sun, Z. Jiang, B. Hao, S. Yan, H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y . Yang, H. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Ji, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Shen, D. Feng, and Y . Nie, (2025), arXiv:2507.07409 [cond-mat.supr-con]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

H. Wang, H. Huang, G. Zhou, W. Lv, C. Yue, L. Xu, X. Wu, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, Y .-J. Sun, W. Chen, H. Yuan, Z. Chen, and Q.-K. Xue, (2025), arXiv:2502.18068 [cond-mat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[61]

Y .-T. Hsu, Y . Liu, Y . Kohama, T. Kotte, V . Sharma, Y . Tarn, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, (2025), arXiv:2505.19011 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Y . Tarn, Y . Liu, F. Theuss, J. Li, B. Y . Wang, J. Wang, V . Thampy, Z.-X. Shen, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, (2025), arXiv:2510.27613 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Y . Liu, B. Y . Wang, J. Li, Y . Tarn, L. Bhatt, M. Colletta, Y .- M. Wu, C.-T. Kuo, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, Z.-X. Shen, S. Raghu, H. Y . Hwang, and Y . Yu, (2026), arXiv:2603.12196 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2026
[64]

J. Shen, Y . Miao, Z. Ou, G. Zhou, Y . Chen, R. Luan, H. Sun, Z. Feng, X. Yong, P. Li, Y . Li, L. Xu, W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y .-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and J. He, (2025), arXiv:2502.17831 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[65]

M. Wang, B. Hao, W. Sun, S. Yan, S. Sun, H. Zhang, Z. Gu, and Y . Nie, Physical Review Letters136, 066002 (2026)

work page 2026
[66]

S. Fan, M. Ou, M. Scholten, Q. Li, Z. Shang, Y . Wang, J. Xu, H. Yang, I. M. Eremin, and H.-H. Wen, (2025), arXiv:2506.01788 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

W. Lyu, Z. Nie, H. Wang, Y . Chen, H. Huang, G. Zhou, Q. Xue, and Z. Chen, Acta Phys. Sin.74, 227403 (2025)

work page 2025
[68]

J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Physical Review Letters 115, 036402 (2015)

work page 2015
[69]

A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer physics communications178, 685 (2008)

work page 2008
[70]

Marzari, A

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vander- bilt, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

work page 2012
[71]

Dronskowski and P

R. Dronskowski and P. E. Bloechl, The Journal of Physical Chemistry97, 8617 (1993)

work page 1993
[72]

V . L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr ´eeff, and R. Dronskowski, The journal of physical chemistry A115, 5461 (2011)

work page 2011
[73]

Maintz, V

S. Maintz, V . L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr ´eeff, and R. Dron- skowski, Journal of computational chemistry37, 1030 (2016)

work page 2016
[74]

Nelson, C

R. Nelson, C. Ertural, J. George, V . L. Deringer, G. Hautier, and R. Dronskowski, Journal of computational chemistry41, 1931 (2020)

work page 1931
[75]

V oruganti, A

P. V oruganti, A. Golubentsev, and S. John, Physical Review B 45, 13945 (1992)

work page 1992
[76]

Z. Wang, K. Jiang, F.-C. Zhang, and H.-K. Jin, To appear

work page
[77]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Physical Review B54, 11169 (1996)

work page 1996
[78]

Kresse and D

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999). 7 tx 1 tz 1 tx 2 tz 2 txz 3 -0.4732 -0.0759 0.0779 -0.0154 0.2022 txz 4 tx ⊥ tz ⊥ ϵ x ϵz -0.0263 0.0081 -0.5868 0.9416 0.3072 tx 1 tz 1 tx 2 tz 2 txz 3 -0.4609 -0.0877 0.0743 -0.0158 0.2106 txz 4 tx ⊥ tz ⊥ ϵ x ϵz -0.0294 0.0087 -0.5845 0.8011 0.3631 TABLE A1. The hopping parameters of the TB Hami...

work page 1999