arxiv: 2604.02541 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · physics.app-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A perfect crystal neutron loop cavity

Owen Lailey , Dusan Sarenac , David G. Cory , Michael G. Huber , Dmitry A. Pushin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det physics.app-ph

keywords neutron cavityBragg reflectionperfect crystalneutron interferometrySchwinger interactionnEDMneutron confinementquantum Zeno effect

0 comments

The pith

A closed loop of perfect silicon crystal blades recirculates neutrons for thousands of Bragg reflections with 64 percent survival.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a neutron loop cavity that uses perfect silicon crystals to send neutrons around a closed path via repeated Bragg reflections. This geometry is predicted to keep about 64 percent of the neutrons intact after 10,000 reflections, giving confinement times of seconds instead of the brief single-pass times of earlier setups. Longer interaction times would allow a proposed Schwinger spin-rotation measurement to reach a full pi rotation in only 800 reflections, more than ten times better sensitivity than current work. The same long storage also supports searches for the neutron electric dipole moment at the 10 to the minus 27 e cm level and tests of neutron parity violation and the quantum Zeno effect.

Core claim

The central claim is that a neutron loop cavity formed by perfect silicon crystal blades can coherently recirculate neutrons through repeated Bragg reflections, achieving a survival probability of ∼64 % for 10,000 Bragg reflections and enabling a π spin rotation in only 800 Bragg reflections for Schwinger interaction measurements, with further applications to nEDM searches at the 10^{-27} e·cm scale and tests of parity violation, neutron lifetime, and the quantum Zeno effect.

What carries the argument

The neutron loop cavity: an arrangement of perfect silicon crystal blades that forms a closed path so neutrons undergo repeated coherent Bragg reflections and recirculate.

If this is right

Confinement times reach the order of seconds rather than single-pass limits.
Schwinger interaction measurements gain more than a factor of ten in sensitivity.
nEDM searches can target the 10^{-27} e·cm scale.
Competitive tests become possible for neutron parity violation and neutron lifetime.
Direct experimental probes of the quantum Zeno effect with neutrons become feasible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Longer neutron storage times could improve precision in other neutron interferometry experiments that currently use single-pass crystals.
The recirculating geometry might be adapted for other diffracting particles or waves once crystal perfection requirements are met.
Real-world performance will depend on alignment stability and crystal quality that must be verified in a working device.

Load-bearing premise

Neutrons maintain coherence and suffer only the calculated losses during thousands of successive Bragg reflections inside the closed crystal loop.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the neutron count surviving 10,000 Bragg reflections in a built silicon-crystal loop cavity; survival well below 64 percent would disprove the predicted confinement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02541 by David G. Cory, Dmitry A. Pushin, Dusan Sarenac, Michael G. Huber, Owen Lailey.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Simulated neutron intensity inside the loop cavity after the first four reflections. Neutrons are incident to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Simulation of the designed cavity performance ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Confined intensity as a function of the number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Coherent control of neutrons via Bragg diffraction forms the foundation of perfect crystal neutron interferometry, facilitating both fundamental tests of quantum mechanics and applications in quantum information science. In cavity geometries, perfect crystals enable neutron confinement and have been employed in precision measurements of spin-orbit interactions and for neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) searches. However, in these conventional configurations, neutrons undergo a single pass through the crystal geometry, placing a physical constraint on both crystal and in-flight interaction times and measurement sensitivity. In this work, we introduce a neutron loop cavity that coherently recirculates neutrons through repeated Bragg reflections between perfect silicon crystal blades. This structure is predicted to achieve a neutron survival probability of $\sim64~\%$ for 10,000 Bragg reflections, corresponding to confinement times on the order of seconds. We propose a Schwinger interaction measurement that achieves a $\pi$ spin rotation in 800 Bragg reflections, representing more than a tenfold improvement in sensitivity over recent measurements. Further applications include high-sensitivity nEDM searches targeting the $10^{-27}~$e$\cdot$cm scale, as well as competitive experimental tests of neutron parity violation, the neutron lifetime, and the quantum Zeno effect with neutrons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The loop cavity geometry is a logical next step for neutron recirculation but the 64% survival after 10k reflections rests on unshown tolerance margins that could be the limiting factor.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper proposes a closed-loop neutron cavity made from perfect silicon crystal blades so the beam can recirculate via Bragg reflections instead of doing a single pass. They predict roughly 64% survival after 10,000 reflections, giving confinement times of seconds, plus a Schwinger spin-rotation measurement that reaches a full pi flip in only 800 reflections for more than a tenfold sensitivity gain over current work. Applications to nEDM at 10^{-27} and parity-violation tests follow from the longer interaction time. The geometry itself is new relative to the single-pass cavities referenced in the abstract, and the numbers line up with ordinary Darwin reflectivity models rather than new physics. That part is straightforward and useful to see laid out. The softer part is the lack of any visible tolerance budget or propagation calculation. Reaching 64% after that many bounces requires per-pass transmission above 0.999955, and a closed loop will accumulate even small divergence, mosaicity, or alignment drift into walk-off from the Bragg condition far sooner than a linear setup. The abstract gives no acceptance-angle analysis or Monte-Carlo check, so it is hard to judge whether the quoted survival is realistic or optimistic. The stress-test note on this point holds up from what is shown. This is for the neutron interferometry and precision-measurement crowd. Someone already working with perfect-crystal optics would get value from the recirculation concept and the listed applications, even if they end up re-deriving the loss estimates themselves. It deserves peer review so the full derivations and feasibility numbers can be checked.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a neutron loop cavity using perfect silicon crystal blades for coherent recirculation of neutrons via repeated Bragg reflections. It claims a survival probability of ∼64% after 10,000 reflections (enabling seconds-scale confinement times) and proposes a Schwinger interaction measurement achieving π spin rotation in 800 reflections (>10× sensitivity gain), plus applications to nEDM searches at 10^{-27} e·cm, parity violation, neutron lifetime, and quantum Zeno effect tests.

Significance. If the survival probability and coherence claims hold, the design would enable substantially longer neutron interaction times than single-pass interferometers, offering potential order-of-magnitude gains in sensitivity for precision measurements of neutron properties and fundamental interactions.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and results section on survival probability] Abstract and results section on survival probability: the ∼64% survival after 10,000 Bragg reflections requires per-pass reflectivity r > 0.999955 (from r^{10000} ≈ 0.64). No tolerance budget, Darwin-width acceptance calculation, mosaicity quantification, or Monte-Carlo beam-propagation analysis is supplied to show that angular mismatch, divergence, or alignment errors remain within the Bragg condition over thousands of recirculating passes without cumulative walk-off losses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment concerns the absence of a detailed tolerance analysis supporting the claimed survival probability. We address this point directly below and will incorporate the requested calculations into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and results section on survival probability] Abstract and results section on survival probability: the ∼64% survival after 10,000 Bragg reflections requires per-pass reflectivity r > 0.999955 (from r^{10000} ≈ 0.64). No tolerance budget, Darwin-width acceptance calculation, mosaicity quantification, or Monte-Carlo beam-propagation analysis is supplied to show that angular mismatch, divergence, or alignment errors remain within the Bragg condition over thousands of recirculating passes without cumulative walk-off losses.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative tolerance analysis is essential to substantiate the survival probability. The per-pass reflectivity requirement of r > 0.999955 follows directly from the stated 64% survival after 10,000 reflections. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit tolerance budget that includes: (i) the Darwin width acceptance angle for Si(111) at the neutron wavelengths considered (∼0.5–2 arcsec), (ii) an upper bound on crystal mosaicity (<0.1 arcsec for high-quality float-zone silicon), and (iii) Monte Carlo ray-tracing results for a 10,000-pass recirculation that incorporate realistic beam divergence (∼0.1 mrad) and alignment tolerances (±0.5 arcsec). These simulations will quantify cumulative walk-off losses and confirm that the Bragg condition can be maintained with >99.995% per-pass efficiency under the stated conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: survival probability and spin-rotation claims rest on standard Bragg reflectivity model without self-referential fitting or definition

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims (∼64% survival after 10,000 reflections and π rotation in 800 reflections) are presented as predictions derived from the geometry and perfect-crystal Darwin reflectivity. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce these numbers to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain relies on conventional neutron optics and Bragg diffraction, which are externally verifiable and not redefined within the paper itself. No load-bearing self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claims rest on ideal coherent Bragg reflection in perfect silicon crystals and negligible decoherence over many bounces; no explicit free parameters are fitted in the abstract, but the survival probability implicitly assumes perfect crystal quality and alignment.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Coherent Bragg diffraction occurs without loss in perfect silicon crystals under ideal alignment
Invoked to support recirculation and survival probability in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

Neutron loop cavity no independent evidence
purpose: Recirculate neutrons via repeated Bragg reflections for long confinement
New geometry introduced in the paper to multiply interaction time.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5523 in / 1400 out tokens · 48380 ms · 2026-05-13T19:53:27.775260+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The average reflectivity is ⟨R⟩=1−Δe n(σabs+σtherm) … For N=10^4 reflections, DD theory predicts a survival probability of η≈70 %
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat_equiv_Nat unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Neutron propagation through perfect crystals as a quantum random walk … equivalence with DD equations

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A unified quantum random walk model for internal crystal effects in dynamical diffraction
physics.app-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

A quantum random walk model unifies and reproduces all established dynamical diffraction effects including linear temperature gradients, Talbot effect, and miscut crystals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Rauch, S

H. Rauch, S. A. Werner, Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, Wave- Particle Duality, and Entanglement, Vol. 12, Oxford Uni- versity Press; 2 edition, 2015

work page 2015
[2]

Rauch, A

H. Rauch, A. Zeilinger, G. Badurek, A. Wilfing, W. Baus- piess, U. Bonse, Verification of coherent spinor rotation of fermions, Phys. Lett. 54A (6) (1975) 425 – 427

work page 1975
[3]

Colella, A

R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, S. A. Werner, Observation of gravitationally induced quantum interference, Physical Review Letters 34 (23) (1975) 1472

work page 1975
[4]

D. A. Pushin, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, Exper- imental realization of decoherence-free subspace in neu- tron interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 150401

work page 2011
[5]

K. Li, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, R. Haun, B. Heacock, M. G. Huber, J. Nsofini, D. A. Pushin, P. Saggu, D. Sarenac, et al., Neutron limit on the strongly-coupled chameleon field, Physical Review D 93 (6) (2016) 062001

work page 2016
[6]

Heacock, T

B. Heacock, T. Fujiie, R. W. Haun, A. Henins, K. Hirota, T. Hosobata, M. G. Huber, M. Kitaguchi, D. A. Pushin, H. Shimizu, et al., Pendell¨ osung interferometry probes the neutron charge radius, lattice dynamics, and fifth forces, Science 373 (6560) (2021) 1239–1243. 9

work page 2021
[7]

Danner, H

A. Danner, H. Lemmel, R. Wagner, S. Sponar, Y. Hasegawa, Neutron interferometer experiments study- ing fundamental features of quantum mechanics, Atoms 11 (6) (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

C. W. Clark, R. Barankov, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, D. A. Pushin, Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum, Nature 525 (7570) (2015) 504–506

work page 2015
[9]

Sarenac, M

D. Sarenac, M. G. Huber, B. Heacock, M. Arif, C. W. Clark, D. G. Cory, C. B. Shahi, D. A. Pushin, Hologra- phy with a neutron interferometer, Optics express 24 (20) (2016) 22528–22535

work page 2016
[10]

Geerits, H

N. Geerits, H. Lemmel, A.-S. Berger, S. Sponar, Phase vortex lattices in neutron interferometry, Communica- tions Physics 6 (1) (2023) 209

work page 2023
[11]

Schuster, H

M. Schuster, H. Rauch, E. Seidl, E. Jericha, C. Carlile, Test of a perfect crystal neutron storage device, Physics Letters A 144 (6-7) (1990) 297–300

work page 1990
[12]

Schuster, E

M. Schuster, E. Jericha, C. Carlile, H. Rauch, A cold neutron storage device and a neutron resonator, Physica B: Condensed Matter 180 (1992) 997–999

work page 1992
[13]

Jericha, C

E. Jericha, C. Carlile, H. Rauch, Performance of an im- proved perfect crystal neutron storage cavity, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 379 (2) (1996) 330–334

work page 1996
[14]

Jericha, C

E. Jericha, C. Carlile, M. J¨ akel, H. Rauch, Cold neutron storage by perfect crystals, Physica B: Condensed Matter 234-236 (1997) 1066–1067

work page 1997
[15]

M. R. Jaekel, C. J. Carlile, E. Jericha, D. E. Schwab, H. Rauch, New measurements with a perfect crystal cav- ity for neutrons, in: EUV, X-Ray, and Neutron Optics and Sources, Vol. 3767, SPIE, 1999, pp. 353–359

work page 1999
[16]

Jaekel, E

M. Jaekel, E. Jericha, H. Rauch, New developments in cold neutron storage with perfect crystals, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 539 (1) (2005) 335–344

work page 2005
[17]

T. R. Gentile, M. G. Huber, D. D. Koetke, M. Peshkin, M. Arif, T. Dombeck, D. S. Hussey, D. L. Jacobson, P. Nord, D. A. Pushin, R. Smither, Direct observation of neutron spin rotation in bragg scattering due to the spin-orbit interaction in silicon, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 034005

work page 2019
[18]

Dombeck, R

T. Dombeck, R. Ringo, D. D. Koetke, H. Kaiser, K. Schoen, S. A. Werner, D. Dombeck, Measurement of the neutron reflectivity for bragg reflections off a perfect silicon crystal, Physical Review A 64 (5) (2001) 053607

work page 2001
[19]

Huber, B

M. Huber, B. Heacock, I. Taminiau, D. Cory, D. Sarenac, R. Valdillez, D. Pushin, Achieving a near-ideal sili- con crystal neutron interferometer using submicrometer fabrication techniques, Physical Review Research 6 (4) (2024) 043079

work page 2024
[20]

Lemmel, M

H. Lemmel, M. Jentschel, H. Abele, F. Lafont, B. Guer- ard, C. P. Sasso, G. Mana, E. Massa, Neutron interfer- ence from a split-crystal interferometer, Applied Crystal- lography 55 (4) (2022) 870–875

work page 2022
[21]

Nsofini, K

J. Nsofini, K. Ghofrani, D. Sarenac, D. G. Cory, D. A. Pushin, Quantum-information approach to dynamical diffraction theory, Physical Review A 94 (6) (Dec 2016)

work page 2016
[22]

Nsofini, D

J. Nsofini, D. Sarenac, K. Ghofrani, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, D. A. Pushin, Noise refocusing in a five-blade neutron interferometer, Journal of Applied Physics 122 (5) (2017) 054501

work page 2017
[23]

Nsofini, D

J. Nsofini, D. Sarenac, D. G. Cory, D. A. Pushin, Co- herence optimization in neutron interferometry through defocusing, Physical Review A 99 (4) (2019) 043614

work page 2019
[24]

Nahman-L´ evesque, D

O. Nahman-L´ evesque, D. Sarenac, D. G. Cory, B. Hea- cock, M. G. Huber, D. A. Pushin, Generalizing the quan- tum information model for dynamic diffraction, Physical Review A 105 (2) (2022) 022403

work page 2022
[25]

Nahman-L´ evesque, D

O. Nahman-L´ evesque, D. Sarenac, O. Lailey, D. G. Cory, M. G. Huber, D. A. Pushin, Quantum information ap- proach to the implementation of a neutron cavity, New Journal of Physics 25 (7) (2023) 073016

work page 2023
[26]

W. Bond, M. Duguay, P. Rentzepis, Proposed resonator for an x-ray laser, Applied Physics Letters 10 (8) (1967) 216–218

work page 1967
[27]

R. D. Deslattes, X-ray monochromators and resonators from single crystals, Applied Physics Letters 12 (4) (1968) 133–135

work page 1968
[28]

Cotterill, A universal planar x-ray resonator, Applied Physics Letters 12 (12) (1968) 403–404

R. Cotterill, A universal planar x-ray resonator, Applied Physics Letters 12 (12) (1968) 403–404

work page 1968
[29]

P. Liu, P. Pradhan, X. Shi, D. Shu, K. Kauchha, Z. Qiao, K. Tamasaku, T. Osaka, D. Zhu, T. Sato, et al., X-ray optics for the cavity-based x-ray free-electron laser, Syn- chrotron Radiation 31 (4) (2024) 751–762

work page 2024
[30]

Bonse, E

U. Bonse, E. Te Kaat, A two-crystal x-ray interferome- ter, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei 214 (1) (1968) 16–21

work page 1968
[31]

M. D. Le, T. Guidi, R. Bewley, J. R. Stewart, E. M. Schooneveld, D. Raspino, D. E. Pooley, J. Boxall, K. F. Gascoyne, N. J. Rhodes, et al., Upgrade of the mari spectrometer at isis, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrom- eters, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1056 (2023) 168646

work page 2023
[32]

National Institute of Standards and Technology, NCNR guide upgrade, NIST Center for Neutron Research (2026)

work page 2026
[33]

Abele, D

H. Abele, D. Dubbers, H. H¨ ase, M. Klein, A. Kn¨ opfler, M. Kreuz, T. Lauer, B. M¨ arkisch, D. Mund, V. Nesvizhevsky, et al., Characterization of a ballistic su- permirror neutron guide, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spec- trometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 562 (1) (2006) 407–417

work page 2006
[34]

Authier, S

A. Authier, S. Lagomarsino, B. K. Tanner, X-ray and neutron dynamical diffraction: theory and applications, Vol. 357, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

work page 2012
[35]

Schwinger, On the polarization of fast neutrons, Phys- ical Review 73 (4) (1948) 407

J. Schwinger, On the polarization of fast neutrons, Phys- ical Review 73 (4) (1948) 407

work page 1948
[36]

Shull, Neutron spin-neutron orbit interaction with slow neutrons, Physical Review Letters 10 (7) (1963) 297

C. Shull, Neutron spin-neutron orbit interaction with slow neutrons, Physical Review Letters 10 (7) (1963) 297

work page 1963
[37]

Shull, R

C. Shull, R. Nathans, Search for a neutron electric dipole moment by a scattering experiment, Physical Review Letters 19 (7) (1967) 384

work page 1967
[38]

Fedorov, I

V. Fedorov, I. Kuznetsov, E. Lapin, S. Y. Semenikhin, V. Voronin, Neutron spin optics in noncentrosymmetric crystals as a new way for nedm search, Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 252 (1) (2006) 131–135

work page 2006
[39]

V. V. Fedorov, M. Jentschel, I. A. Kuznetsov, E. G. Lapin, E. Lelievre-Berna, V. Nesvizhevsky, A. Petoukhov, S. Y. Semenikhin, T. Soldner, V. V. Voronin, et al., Measurement of the neutron elec- tric dipole moment via spin rotation in a non- 10 centrosymmetric crystal, Physics Letters B 694 (1) (2010) 22–25

work page 2010
[40]

Fedorov, V

V. Fedorov, V. Voronin, Modern status of searches for nedm, using neutron optics and diffraction in noncen- trosymmetric crystals, in: Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Neutron Optics (NOP2017), 2018, p. 011007

work page 2018
[41]

Zeilinger, M

A. Zeilinger, M. Horne, H. Bernstein, Symmetry viola- tions and schwinger scattering in neutron interferometry, Le Journal de Physique Colloques 45 (C3) (1984) C3– 209

work page 1984
[42]

C. Abel, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres, C. A. Baker, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, M. Burghoff, E. Chanel, et al., Measurement of the permanent electric dipole mo- ment of the neutron, Physical Review Letters 124 (8) (2020) 081803

work page 2020
[43]

Lamoreaux, R

S. Lamoreaux, R. Golub, Experimental searches for the neutron electric dipole moment, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 36 (10) (2009) 104002

work page 2009
[44]

M. R. Schindler, R. P. Springer, The theory of parity violation in few-nucleon systems, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 72 (2013) 1–43

work page 2013
[45]

W. M. Snow, C. Bass, T. Bass, B. Crawford, K. Gan, B. Heckel, D. Luo, D. Markoff, A. Micherdzinska, H. Mumm, et al., Upper bound on parity-violating neu- tron spin rotation in he 4, Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics 83 (2) (2011) 022501

work page 2011
[46]

C. D. Bass, T. D. Bass, B. Heckel, C. Huffer, D. Luo, D. Markoff, A. Micherdzinska, W. Snow, H. Swanson, S. Walbridge, A liquid helium target system for a mea- surement of parity violation in neutron spin rotation, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 612 (1) (2009) 69–82

work page 2009
[47]

Musedinovic, L

R. Musedinovic, L. Blokland, C. Cude-Woods, M. Singh, M. Blatnik, N. Callahan, J. Choi, S. Clayton, B. Filip- pone, W. Fox, et al., Measurement of the free neutron lifetime in a magneto-gravitational trap with in situ de- tection, Physical Review C 111 (4) (2025) 045501

work page 2025
[48]

Caylor, R

J. Caylor, R. Biswas, B. Crawford, M. Dewey, N. Fomin, G. Greene, S. Hoogerheide, J. Hungria- Negron, H. Mumm, J. Nico, et al., Detection of molecular hydrogen in a proton trap, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01682 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Y. Fuwa, T. Hasegawa, K. Hirota, T. Hoshino, R. Hosokawa, G. Ichikawa, S. Ieki, T. Ino, Y. Iwashita, M. Kitaguchi, et al., Improved measurements of neutron lifetime with cold neutron beam at j-parc, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19519 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Chowdhury, S

T. Chowdhury, S. Ipek, Neutron lifetime anomaly and big bang nucleosynthesis, Canadian Journal of Physics 102 (2) (2023) 96–99

work page 2023
[51]

Misra, E

B. Misra, E. G. Sudarshan, The zeno’s paradox in quan- tum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 18 (4) (1977) 756–763

work page 1977
[52]

W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, D. J. Wineland, Quantum zeno effect, Physical Review A 41 (5) (1990) 2295

work page 1990
[53]

M. C. Fischer, B. Guti´ errez-Medina, M. G. Raizen, Ob- servation of the quantum zeno and anti-zeno effects in an unstable system, Physical review letters 87 (4) (2001) 040402

work page 2001
[54]

Kwiat, H

P. Kwiat, H. Weinfurter, T. Herzog, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Kasevich, Interaction-free measurement, Physical Re- view Letters 74 (24) (1995) 4763

work page 1995
[55]

Pascazio, M

S. Pascazio, M. Namiki, G. Badurek, H. Rauch, Quantum zeno effect with neutron spin, Physics Letters A 179 (3) (1993) 155–160

work page 1993
[56]

Rauch, Quantum zeno-effect with polarized neutrons, Physica B: Condensed Matter 297 (1-4) (2001) 299–302

H. Rauch, Quantum zeno-effect with polarized neutrons, Physica B: Condensed Matter 297 (1-4) (2001) 299–302

work page 2001
[57]

Facchi, Y

P. Facchi, Y. Nakaguro, H. Nakazato, S. Pascazio, M. Un- oki, K. Yuasa, Optimization of a neutron-spin test of the quantum zeno effect, Physical Review A 68 (1) (2003) 012107

work page 2003
[58]

Lewalle, Y

P. Lewalle, Y. Zhang, K. B. Whaley, Optimal zeno drag- ging for quantum control: a shortcut to zeno with action- based scheduling optimization, PRX Quantum 5 (2) (2024) 020366

work page 2024
[59]

Hacohen-Gourgy, L

S. Hacohen-Gourgy, L. P. Garc´ ıa-Pintos, L. S. Martin, J. Dressel, I. Siddiqi, Incoherent qubit control using the quantum zeno effect, Physical review letters 120 (2) (2018) 020505

work page 2018
[60]

T. R. Gentile, P. Nacher, B. Saam, T. Walker, Optically polarized he 3, Reviews of modern physics 89 (4) (2017) 045004

work page 2017
[61]

S. A. Werner, R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, C. Eagen, Observation of the phase shift of a neutron due to preces- sion in a magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 35 (16) (1975) 1053

work page 1975
[62]

M. G. Huber, M. Arif, T. Black, W. Chen, T. R. Gen- tile, D. S. Hussey, D. Pushin, . f. F. Wietfeldt, L. Yang, Precision measurement of the n-he 3 incoherent scatter- ing length using neutron interferometry, Physical review letters 102 (20) (2009) 200401

work page 2009
[63]

M. G. Huber, M. Arif, W. C. Chen, T. R. Gentile, D. S. Hussey, T. C. Black, D. A. Pushin, C. B. Shahi, F. E. Wi- etfeldt, L. Yang, Neutron interferometric measurement of the scattering length difference between the triplet and singlet states of n-he 3, Physical Review C 90 (6) (2014) 064004

work page 2014
[64]

Burgarth, P

D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, G. Gramegna, K. Yuasa, One bound to rule them all: from adiabatic to zeno, Quantum 6 (2022) 737

work page 2022
[65]

Aharonov, A

Y. Aharonov, A. Casher, Topological quantum effects for neutral particles, Physical Review Letters 53 (4) (1984) 319

work page 1984
[66]

Cimmino, G

A. Cimmino, G. Opat, A. Klein, H. Kaiser, S. Werner, M. Arif, R. Clothier, Observation of the topological aharonov-casher phase shift by neutron interferometry, Physical review letters 63 (4) (1989) 380

work page 1989
[67]

Boffi, G

S. Boffi, G. Caglioti, Further remarks on the coherence properties of a thermal neutron beam, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) 3 (2) (1971) 262–268

work page 1971
[68]

Silverman, On the feasibility of a neutron hanbury brown—twiss experiment with gravitationally-induced phase shift, Physics Letters A 132 (4) (1988) 154–158

M. Silverman, On the feasibility of a neutron hanbury brown—twiss experiment with gravitationally-induced phase shift, Physics Letters A 132 (4) (1988) 154–158

work page 1988
[69]

Iannuzzi, A

M. Iannuzzi, A. Orecchini, F. Sacchetti, P. Facchi, S. Pas- cazio, Direct experimental evidence of free-fermion anti- bunching, Physical review letters 96 (8) (2006) 080402

work page 2006
[70]

Iannuzzi, R

M. Iannuzzi, R. Messi, D. Moricciani, A. Orecchini, F. Sacchetti, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, Further evidence of antibunching of two coherent beams of fermions, Physi- cal Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 84 (1) (2011) 015601

work page 2011