pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04761 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.app-ph· physics.optics

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

What quantum computer to buy?

Alex Krasnok

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords quantum capabilityprocurement frameworksuperconducting circuitstrapped ionsneutral atomsquantum annealingphotonicsinstitutional strategy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Most institutions should start with the smallest quantum capability layer that delivers repeatable near-term value rather than committing to large on-premises systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper treats the decision to acquire quantum technology as a choice among five distinct capability layers, each tied to a different purpose such as teaching, research, hardware training, optimization tasks, or long-term strategic use. It compares the main commercial platforms—superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral atoms, quantum annealing, and photonics—by separating documented peer-reviewed performance from vendor roadmaps and pricing. The central recommendation is that most organizations begin at the smallest layer that yields usable results while building expertise and keeping options open. Large dedicated systems make sense only after mission needs, facilities, staffing, and upgrade plans are already defined. This approach matters because it reduces the risk of locking resources into hardware whose useful lifetime and performance remain uncertain.

Core claim

The manuscript develops a practical procurement framework that distinguishes five capability layers, separates peer-reviewed results from commercial offerings, pricing anchors, and public roadmaps, and compares the main commercial platform families through the lens of institutional fit, access model, and refresh pressure. The main conclusion is that most institutions should begin with the smallest layer of capability that produces repeatable near-term value, builds internal expertise, and preserves strategic flexibility. Large on-premises systems are justified only when mission requirements, site readiness, staffing, governance, and upgrade paths are already clear.

What carries the argument

The five capability layers, which map distinct institutional purposes—cloud access for teaching, reserved capacity for research, local instruments for hardware training, optimization appliances, and strategic installations—to appropriate access models and hardware choices while filtering out unverified roadmaps.

If this is right

  • Cloud access meets teaching and early exploration needs without ownership or maintenance burdens.
  • Reserved capacity supports research programs while avoiding the full cost of site preparation.
  • Local instruments enable hardware training only when facilities and technical staff are already in place.
  • Optimization appliances address targeted problems such as annealing without requiring general-purpose quantum hardware.
  • Strategic installations reshape budgets and staffing only after governance structures and upgrade paths are defined.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layered model suggests that smaller organizations can participate in quantum work without waiting for larger players to set standards.
  • Periodic updates to the platform comparisons will be required as new peer-reviewed benchmarks appear.
  • Starting at the lowest useful layer may shorten the time to internal expertise compared with waiting for a single large purchase.

Load-bearing premise

The five capability layers are meaningfully distinct and the comparisons of commercial platforms accurately separate peer-reviewed results from marketing roadmaps in a way that remains stable enough for procurement decisions.

What would settle it

A clear case in which two of the proposed layers produce indistinguishable value or costs for the same institution, or in which vendor roadmaps prove consistently more accurate than current peer-reviewed data for predicting useful system lifetime, would undermine the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04761 by Alex Krasnok.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Procurement workflow. A disciplined buying process starts with mission definition, separates evidence classes, scores capability layers, rejects blocked options, tests the low-budget path, and only then decides whether to defer, rent, reserve, or own. number of operational goals: broad access for students, repeated hands-on use for hardware research, secure and low-latency integration with classical infras… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Platforms and public roadmaps. Solid blocks indicate customer-visible offerings now. Dashed blocks indicate public roadmap targets only. The figure should be read as a market map and a refresh-pressure signal, not as a cross-platform performance ranking. purchase even when the current system is good. Buyers should therefore negotiate upgrade rights, acceptance tests, service commitments, and training deliv… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustrative five-year total cost of ownership. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The phrase ``buy a quantum computer'' hides several different procurement problems. An institution may be seeking cloud access for teaching, reserved capacity for research, a local instrument for hardware training, an optimization appliance, or a strategic installation that reshapes facilities, staffing, and budgets. Because these choices differ in purpose, operating burden, and useful lifetime, the decision should be framed as acquisition of \emph{quantum capability} rather than selection of a presumed hardware winner. This manuscript develops a practical procurement framework that distinguishes five capability layers, separates peer-reviewed results from commercial offerings, pricing anchors, and public roadmaps, and compares the main commercial platform families -- superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral atoms, quantum annealing, and photonics -- through the lens of institutional fit, access model, and refresh pressure. The main conclusion is that most institutions should begin with the smallest layer of capability that produces repeatable near-term value, builds internal expertise, and preserves strategic flexibility. Large on-premises systems are justified only when mission requirements, site readiness, staffing, governance, and upgrade paths are already clear.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a procurement framework for quantum computing that reframes the decision as acquiring one of five distinct capability layers rather than selecting a single hardware platform. It separates peer-reviewed results from commercial offerings and roadmaps, then compares the main families (superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral atoms, quantum annealing, photonics) according to institutional fit, access model, operating burden, and refresh pressure. The central recommendation is that most institutions should begin at the smallest layer that delivers repeatable near-term value, builds expertise, and preserves flexibility; large on-premises systems are justified only when mission requirements, site readiness, staffing, governance, and upgrade paths are already clear.

Significance. If the five-layer distinctions and platform characterizations remain stable, the framework supplies concrete, actionable guidance that could reduce mismatched investments by institutions entering quantum technology. The explicit separation of peer-reviewed evidence from marketing roadmaps and the emphasis on access models rather than hardware winners constitute a practical contribution in a field where procurement decisions are often driven by hype.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'five capability layers' without enumerating them; listing the layers (even in a single sentence) would allow readers to grasp the framework immediately.
  2. [Platform comparisons] The platform comparisons would benefit from a summary table that aligns each family with the five layers, access models, and refresh-pressure indicators; this would make the institutional-fit analysis easier to use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript, the accurate summary of its contributions, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were enumerated in the report, so we have no point-by-point rebuttals to provide. We will make any minor editorial adjustments in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; advisory framework is self-contained

full rationale

The manuscript is an advisory procurement framework that distinguishes five capability layers and compares commercial quantum platforms (superconducting, trapped ions, neutral atoms, annealing, photonics) through institutional fit, access models, and roadmaps. It advances no mathematical derivations, equations, predictions, or first-principles claims. The central recommendation to begin at the smallest useful capability layer follows directly from the explicitly stated distinctions and external separation of peer-reviewed results from commercial offerings. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; the analysis draws on independent external benchmarks and remains non-circular by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on domain assumptions about the stability of platform comparisons and the utility of the five-layer distinction; no free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The five capability layers provide a useful and stable distinction for procurement decisions across institutions.
    Invoked in the development of the framework to separate use cases like teaching from strategic installations.
  • domain assumption Peer-reviewed results can be reliably separated from commercial offerings and public roadmaps for the purpose of comparison.
    Stated as part of the practical framework that compares main commercial platform families.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1310 out tokens · 54380 ms · 2026-05-10T19:29:00.659666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond.Quantum, 2:79, 2018

    John Preskill. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond.Quantum, 2:79, 2018. doi: 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018

  2. [2]

    Cerezoet al., Variational quantum al- gorithms, Nat

    M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, et al. Variational quantum algorithms.Nature Reviews Physics, 3:625–644, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 2021

  3. [3]

    Kottmann, Tim Menke, Wai-Keong Mok, Sukin Sim, Leong-Chuan Kwek, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik

    Kishor Bharti, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Thi Ha Kyaw, et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms.Reviews of Modern Physics, 94:015004, 2022. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 2022

  4. [4]

    Overview of plans.https://quantum.cloud.ibm.com/docs/guides/plans- overview, 2026

    IBM Quantum. Overview of plans.https://quantum.cloud.ibm.com/docs/guides/plans- overview, 2026

    2026

  5. [5]

    Amazon braket pricing, 2026

    Amazon Web Services. Amazon braket pricing, 2026. Amazon Braket pricing page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  6. [6]

    The ibm quantum development roadmap, 2026

    IBM Quantum. The ibm quantum development roadmap, 2026. IBM roadmap update discussing 2026 milestones; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  7. [7]

    Quantinuum. Quantinuum unveils accelerated roadmap to achieve universal fault-tolerant quantum computing by 2030.https://www.quantinuum.com/press-releases/quantinuum- 16 unveils- accelerated- roadmap- to- achieve- universal- fault- tolerant- quantum- computing-by-2030, 2024

    2030

  8. [8]

    Pasqal roadmap update, 2025

    Pasqal. Pasqal roadmap update, 2025. Pasqal roadmap announcement dated 2025-06-12; accessed 2026-04-02

    2025

  9. [9]

    Roadmap 2026–2033.https://www.quandela.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/0 3/Quandela-Roadmap-190326-web.pdf, 2026

    Quandela. Roadmap 2026–2033.https://www.quandela.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/0 3/Quandela-Roadmap-190326-web.pdf, 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    Premium access, 2026

    QuEra Computing. Premium access, 2026. QuEra premium-access page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  11. [11]

    The leap quantum cloud service.https://www.dwavesys.com/solutions- and-products/cloud-platform/, 2026

    D-Wave Quantum. The leap quantum cloud service.https://www.dwavesys.com/solutions- and-products/cloud-platform/, 2026

    2026

  12. [12]

    Leap quantum launchpad, 2025

    D-Wave Quantum Inc. Leap quantum launchpad, 2025. D-Wave Leap Quantum LaunchPad page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2025

  13. [13]

    System model helios, 2025

    Quantinuum. System model helios, 2025. Quantinuum Helios product page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2025

  14. [14]

    Democratising access to quantum computing: Iqm launches iqm spark for universities and labs

    IQM Quantum Computers. Democratising access to quantum computing: Iqm launches iqm spark for universities and labs. https://meetiqm.com/press-releases/democratising- access-to-quantum-computing-iqm-quantum-computers-launches-iqm-spark-for- universities-and-labs/, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Rigetti launches the novera qpu, the company’s first commercially available qpu

    Rigetti Computing. Rigetti launches the novera qpu, the company’s first commercially available qpu. https://www.rigetti.com/news/rigetti-launches-novera-qpu-the-companys- first-commercially-available-qpu, 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    The world’s leading 19-inch rack-mounted quantum computer

    Alpine Quantum Technologies. The world’s leading 19-inch rack-mounted quantum computer. https://www.aqt.eu/solution/pine-system-19-rack-mounted-quantum-computer/, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    On-premises quantum computing, 2026

    QuEra Computing. On-premises quantum computing, 2026. QuEra on-premises/lease page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  18. [18]

    Ac1000.https://atom-computing.com/ac1000/, 2026

    Atom Computing. Ac1000.https://atom-computing.com/ac1000/, 2026

    2026

  19. [19]

    The advantage2 quantum computer.https://www.dwavesys.com/solutio ns-and-products/systems/, 2026

    D-Wave Quantum. The advantage2 quantum computer.https://www.dwavesys.com/solutio ns-and-products/systems/, 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    Enterprise-grade quantum, deployed where you need it.https: //oqc.tech/access/deployments/, 2026

    Oxford Quantum Circuits. Enterprise-grade quantum, deployed where you need it.https: //oqc.tech/access/deployments/, 2026

    2026

  21. [21]

    Mosaiq, 2026

    Quandela. Mosaiq, 2026. Quandela product page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  22. [22]

    Orca pt-2.https://orcacomputing.com/orca-pt-2/, 2024

    ORCA Computing. Orca pt-2.https://orcacomputing.com/orca-pt-2/, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    New ibm quantum flex plan enables new path to premium access.https: //www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/flex-plan, 2025

    IBM Quantum. New ibm quantum flex plan enables new path to premium access.https: //www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/flex-plan, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    D-wave quantum press conference presentation: Quantum circuits acquisition

    D-Wave Quantum. D-wave quantum press conference presentation: Quantum circuits acquisition. https://s201.q4cdn.com/339170267/files/doc_presentations/2026/Jan/07/D-Wave- Quantum-Press-Conference-Presentation-Quantum-Circuits-Inc-Acquisition.pdf , 2026. 17

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Ionq technology and product roadmap, 2025

    IonQ. Ionq technology and product roadmap, 2025. IonQ roadmap webpage; accessed 2026-04-02

    2025

  26. [26]

    Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits.Nature Reviews Materials, 6: 875–891, 2021

    Irfan Siddiqi. Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits.Nature Reviews Materials, 6: 875–891, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4 2021

  27. [27]

    Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance

    Youngseok Kim, Andrew Eddins, Sajant Anand, et al. Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance.Nature, 618:500–505, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 2023

  28. [28]

    and Ansmann, Markus and Arute, Frank and Arya, Kunal and Asfaw, Abraham and Atalaya, Juan and Babbush, Ryan and Bacon, Dave and Bardin, Joseph C

    Rajeev Acharya et al. Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature, 614:676–681, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1 2023

  29. [29]

    Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold,

    Rajeev Acharya et al. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold.Nature, 638: 920–926, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y 2025

  30. [30]

    Ibm quantum computing: Hardware and roadmap.https://www.ibm.com/qu antum/hardware, 2026

    IBM Quantum. Ibm quantum computing: Hardware and roadmap.https://www.ibm.com/qu antum/hardware, 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Rigetti Computing. Rigetti computing reports second quarter 2025 financial results; announces general availability of its 36-qubit multi-chip quantum computer.https://www.rigetti.com/ne ws/rigetti-computing-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results-announces- general-availability-of-its-36-qubit-multi-chip-quantum-computer, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Rigetti computing provides update on 108-qubit system.https://www.ri getti.com/news/rigetti-computing-provides-update-108-qubit-system, 2026

    Rigetti Computing. Rigetti computing provides update on 108-qubit system.https://www.ri getti.com/news/rigetti-computing-provides-update-108-qubit-system, 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    Iqm launches iqm radiance: A 150-qubit system paving the way to quantum advantage

    IQM Quantum Computers. Iqm launches iqm radiance: A 150-qubit system paving the way to quantum advantage. https://meetiqm.com/press-releases/iqm-launches-iqm-radiance- a-150-qubit-system-paving-the-way-to-quantum-advantage/, 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    Iqm roadmap toward fault-tolerant quantum computing by 2030,

    IQM Quantum Computers. Iqm roadmap toward fault-tolerant quantum computing by 2030,

    2030

  35. [35]

    IQM roadmap announcement dated 2024-11-13; accessed 2026-04-02

    2024

  36. [36]

    Iqm launches halocene, a new quantum computer product line for error correction

    IQM Quantum Computers. Iqm launches halocene, a new quantum computer product line for error correction. https://meetiqm.com/press-releases/iqm-launches-halocene-a-new- quantum-computer-product-line-for-error-correction/, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Oqc launches toshiko, 2023

    Oxford Quantum Circuits. Oqc launches toshiko, 2023. OQC press release dated 2023-11-27; accessed 2026-04-02

    2023

  38. [38]

    Technical roadmap, 2026

    Oxford Quantum Circuits. Technical roadmap, 2026. OQC roadmap page describing Genesis, Titan, Athena, and Atlas

    2026

  39. [39]

    Direct access / oqc cloud, 2026

    Oxford Quantum Circuits. Direct access / oqc cloud, 2026. OQC access webpage; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  40. [40]

    Roadmap.https://quantumai.google/roadmap, 2026

    Google Quantum AI. Roadmap.https://quantumai.google/roadmap, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges,

    Colin D. Bruzewicz, John Chiaverini, Robert McConnell, and Jeremy M. Sage. Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges.Applied Physics Reviews, 6(2):021314, 2019. doi: 10.1063/1.5088164. 18

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5088164 2019

  42. [42]

    Campbell, Joan M

    Mohsin Iqbal, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ruben Verresen, Sara L. Campbell, Joan M. Dreiling, Caroline Figgatt, John P. Gaebler, Jacob Johansen, Michael Mills, Steven A. Moses, Juan M. Pino, Anthony Ransford, Mary Rowe, Peter Siegfried, Russell P. Stutz, Michael Foss-Feig, Ashvin Vishwanath, Henrik Dreyer, et al. Non-abelian topological order and anyons on ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4 2024

  43. [43]

    M.et al.Identification of short-range ordering motifs in semiconductors.Science389, 1342–1346 (2025)

    C. Ryan-Anderson, N. C. Brown, C. H. Baldwin, J. M. Dreiling, C. Foltz, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, N. Hewitt, C. Holliman, C. V. Horst, J. Johansen, D. Lucchetti, T. Mengle, M. Matheny, Y. Matsuoka, K. Mayer, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, J. Pino, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, J. Walker, and D. Hayes. High-fidelity teleportation of a logical qubi...

    work page doi:10.1126/science 2024

  44. [44]

    Ionq forte enterprise: Quantum computer for data centers.https://www.ionq.com/qua ntum-systems/forte-enterprise, 2026

    IonQ. Ionq forte enterprise: Quantum computer for data centers.https://www.ionq.com/qua ntum-systems/forte-enterprise, 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Ionq tempo: 100-qubit quantum computer (#aq 64).https://www.ionq.com/quantum- systems/tempo, 2025

    IonQ. Ionq tempo: 100-qubit quantum computer (#aq 64).https://www.ionq.com/quantum- systems/tempo, 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    Overcoming the last major hurdle to deliver scalable universal fault-tolerant quantum computers by 2029, 2025

    Quantinuum. Overcoming the last major hurdle to deliver scalable universal fault-tolerant quantum computers by 2029, 2025. Quantinuum blog/announcement; accessed 2026-04-02

    2029

  47. [47]

    Aqt announces its trapped-ion quantum computer now available on amazon braket

    Alpine Quantum Technologies. Aqt announces its trapped-ion quantum computer now available on amazon braket. https://www.aqt.eu/aqt-announces-its-trapped-ion-quantum- computer-now-available-on-amazon-braket/, 2025

    2025

  48. [48]

    Alpine Quantum Technologies. Aqt was awarded a european tender for a trapped-ion quantum computer, with installation set for 2025.https://www.aqt.eu/aqt-wins-european-tender- for-trapped-ions-quantum-computer-installation-set-for-2025/, 2024

    2025

  49. [49]

    Wintersperger, K. et al. Neutral atom quantum computing hardware.https://arxiv.org/pd f/2304.14360, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [51]

    Bluvstein, S

    Dolev Bluvstein, Simon J. Evered, Alexandra A. Geim, Sophie H. Li, Hengyun Zhou, Tom Manovitz, Sepehr Ebadi, Madelyn Cain, Marcin Kalinowski, Dominik Hangleiter, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Nishad Maskara, Iris Cong, Xun Gao, Pedro Sales Rodriguez, Thomas Karolyshyn, Giulia Semeghini, Michael J. Gullans, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, Mikhail D. Lukin, et ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 2024

  51. [52]

    Sales Rodriguez et al

    Pedro Sales Rodriguez, John M. Robinson, Paul Niklas Jepsen, Zhiyang He, Casey Duckering, Chen Zhao, Kai-Hsin Wu, Joseph Campo, Kevin Bagnall, Minho Kwon, Thomas Karolyshyn, Phillip Weinberg, et al. Experimental demonstration of logical magic state distillation.Nature, 645:620–625, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09367-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09367-3 2025

  52. [53]

    A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation,

    Dolev Bluvstein, Alexandra A. Geim, Sophie H. Li, Simon J. Evered, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Gefen Baranes, Andi Gu, Tom Manovitz, Muqing Xu, Marcin Kalinowski, Shayan Majidy, Christian Kokail, Nishad Maskara, Elias C. Trapp, Luke M. Stewart, Simon Hollerith, Hengyun Zhou, Michael J. Gullans, Susanne F. Yelin, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, Madelyn Cain,...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09848-5 2026

  53. [54]

    Roadmap for advanced error-corrected quantum computers

    QuEra Computing. Roadmap for advanced error-corrected quantum computers. https: //www.quera.com/press-releases/quera-computing-releases-a-groundbreaking- roadmap-for-advanced-error-corrected-quantum-computers-pioneering-the-next- frontier-in-quantum-innovation-0, 2024

    2024

  54. [55]

    Quera roadmap, 2026

    QuEra Computing. Quera roadmap, 2026. QuEra roadmap webpage; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  55. [56]

    Quantum processing units, 2026

    Pasqal. Quantum processing units, 2026. Pasqal hardware/product webpage; accessed 2026-04- 02

    2026

  56. [57]

    Software.https://www.pasqal.com/solutions/software/, 2026

    Pasqal. Software.https://www.pasqal.com/solutions/software/, 2026

    2026

  57. [58]

    Pasqal delivers a 140-qubit system to cineca, 2026

    Pasqal. Pasqal delivers a 140-qubit system to cineca, 2026. Pasqal/CINECA delivery announce- ment; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  58. [59]

    Technology, 2026

    Atom Computing. Technology, 2026. Atom Computing technology webpage; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  59. [60]

    Atom computing: Home.https://atom-computing.com/, 2026

    Atom Computing. Atom computing: Home.https://atom-computing.com/, 2026

    2026

  60. [61]

    King, Jack Raymond, Trevor Lanting, Richard Harris, Alex Zucca, Fabio Altomare, Andrew J

    Andrew D. King, Jack Raymond, Trevor Lanting, Richard Harris, Alex Zucca, Fabio Altomare, Andrew J. Berkley, Kelly Boothby, Sara Ejtemaee, Colin Enderud, Emile Hoskinson, Shuiyuan Huang, Eric Ladizinsky, Allison J. R. MacDonald, Gaelen Marsden, Reza Molavi, Travis Oh, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Mauricio Reis, Chris Rich, Yuki Sato, Nicholas Tsai, Mark Volkma...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05867-2 2023

  61. [62]

    Beyond-classical compu- tation in quantum simulation,

    Andrew D. King, Alberto Nocera, Marek M. Rams, et al. Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation.Science, 388(6743):199–204, 2025. doi: 10.1126/science.ado6285

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ado6285 2025

  62. [63]

    D-Wave Quantum. D-wave announces agreement to acquire quantum circuits inc.https: //www.dwavequantum.com/company/newsroom/press- release/d- wave- to- acquire- quantum-circuits-inc-establishing-world-s-leading-quantum-computing-company/ , 2026

    2026

  63. [64]

    D-wave demonstrates first scalable, on-chip cryogenic control of gate-model qubits

    D-Wave Quantum. D-wave demonstrates first scalable, on-chip cryogenic control of gate-model qubits. https://www.dwavequantum.com/company/newsroom/press-release/d-wave- demonstrates-first-scalable-on-chip-cryogenic-control-of-gate-model-qubits/ , 2026

    2026

  64. [65]

    Belenos / mosaiq 12, 2025

    Quandela. Belenos / mosaiq 12, 2025. Quandela product announcement/specification page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2025

  65. [66]

    Technology.https://orcacomputing.com/technology/, 2026

    ORCA Computing. Technology.https://orcacomputing.com/technology/, 2026

    2026

  66. [67]

    Orca computing delivers first photonic quantum computing system to uk’s national quantum computing centre

    ORCA Computing. Orca computing delivers first photonic quantum computing system to uk’s national quantum computing centre. https://orcacomputing.com/installation-marks- key-milestone-in-the-uks-121m-quantum-initiative-advancing-practical-quantum- research/, 2025. 20

    2025

  67. [68]

    Aghaee Rad et al

    H. Aghaee Rad et al. Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer.Nature,

  68. [69]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08406-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08406-9

  69. [70]

    doi:10.1038/s4 1586-025-09527-5

    Lars S. Madsen, Fabian Laudenbach, Mohsen Falamarzi Askarani, Fabien Rortais, Trevor Vincent, Jacob F. F. Bulmer, Filippo M. Miatto, Leonhard Neuhaus, Lukas G. Helt, Matthew J. Collins, Adriana E. Lita, Thomas Gerrits, Sae Woo Nam, Varun D. Vaidya, Marco Menotti, Ish Dhand, Zachary Vernon, Nicolás Quesada, and Jonathan Lavoie. Quantum computational advant...

    work page doi:10.1038/s4 2022

  70. [71]

    Wein, Alexia Salavrakos, Patrick Sinnott, Dario A

    Nicolas Maring, Andreas Fyrillas, Mathias Pont, Edouard Ivanov, Petr Stepanov, Nico Margaria, William Hease, Anton Pishchagin, Aristide Lemaître, Isabelle Sagnes, Thi Huong Au, Sébastien Boissier, Eric Bertasi, Aurélien Baert, Mario Valdivia, Marie Billard, Ozan Acar, Alexandre Brieussel, Rawad Mezher, Stephen C. Wein, Alexia Salavrakos, Patrick Sinnott, ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01403-4 2024

  71. [72]

    Konno et al., „Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light”, Sci- ence, t

    Shunya Konno, Warit Asavanant, Fumiya Hanamura, Hironari Nagayoshi, Kosuke Fukui, Akira Sakaguchi, Ryohei Ide, Fumio China, Masahiro Yabuno, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Kento Takase, Masaya Endo, Petr Marek, Radim Filip, Peter van Loock, and Akira Furusawa. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light.Science, 383(6680)...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk7560 2024

  72. [73]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, Y. Zhang, M. Vasmer, Z. Vernon, L. F. S. S. M. Villalobos, B. W. Walshe, R. Weil, X. Xin, X. Yan, Y. Yao, M. Zamani Abnili, et al. Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer.Nature, 638:912–919, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024- 08406-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024- 2025

  73. [74]

    Nature641(8064), 876–883 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08820-7

    PsiQuantum Team. A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing.Nature, 641: 876–883, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08820-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08820-7 2025

  74. [75]

    Orca computing, 2026

    ORCA Computing. Orca computing, 2026. ORCA company home page; accessed 2026-04-02

    2026

  75. [76]

    Quantum optics educational kits.https://www.thorlabs.com/quantum-optics- educational-kits, 2026

    Thorlabs. Quantum optics educational kits.https://www.thorlabs.com/quantum-optics- educational-kits, 2026

    2026

  76. [77]

    qued.https://qutools.com/qued/, 2026

    qutools. qued.https://qutools.com/qued/, 2026

    2026

  77. [78]

    Spinq gemini mini/mini pro 2-qubit portable nmr quantum computer.https://www.sp inquanta.com/products-services/spinq-gemini-mini, 2026

    SpinQ. Spinq gemini mini/mini pro 2-qubit portable nmr quantum computer.https://www.sp inquanta.com/products-services/spinq-gemini-mini, 2026

    2026

  78. [79]

    Spinq gemini lab quantum computing experimental platform.https://www.spinquan ta.com/products-services/spinq-gemini-lab, 2026

    SpinQ. Spinq gemini lab quantum computing experimental platform.https://www.spinquan ta.com/products-services/spinq-gemini-lab, 2026. 21

    2026