arxiv: 2604.05023 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Signals of Doomsday III: Cosmological signatures of the late time U(1)_{EM} symmetry breaking

Amartya Sengupta, Dejan Stojkovic

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords late-time symmetry breakingU(1)EM breakingbubble nucleationfirst-order phase transitionphoton neutrino signalscosmological signaturesvacuum mismatchmulti-messenger detection

0 comments

The pith

Late-time breaking of electromagnetism via bubble nucleation produces detectable high-energy photon and neutrino bursts that precede the bubble wall arrival.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models a possible late-time first-order phase transition that breaks the U(1)EM gauge symmetry through nucleation of true-vacuum bubbles in a new scalar field. It calculates the spectrum of particles produced at the bubble walls using the vacuum-mismatch method until terminal velocity and continues with thermal production of scalars and massive photons from frictional dissipation. These particles decay into Standard Model states, yielding dominant high-energy photons and neutrinos as long-range signals. The model shows that even modest slowing of the bubble walls allows these signals to reach observers before the wall itself arrives. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a concrete mechanism for detecting a fundamental change in one of the universe's remaining unbroken symmetries through multi-messenger astronomy.

Core claim

For the conservative set of parameters used here, the thermal channel produces a macroscopically large burst of high-energy photons and neutrinos, which could in principle be detectable from sufficiently nearby bubbles with present or future multi-messenger facilities, serving as a precursor to the arrival of the bubble wall from a late-time first-order phase transition that breaks U(1)EM.

What carries the argument

The vacuum-mismatch method combined with frictional dissipation at terminal wall velocity, which generates the spectrum of scalars and massive photons that decay into observable photons and neutrinos.

If this is right

The produced photons and neutrinos act as long-range signatures of the symmetry-breaking transition.
Even a modest subluminal wall velocity provides an observable lead time for the signals.
The dominant final decay products after hadronization are photons and neutrinos.
The thermal channel remains active after the mismatch channel shuts off, sustaining the burst.
Such events could be probed by existing or planned multi-messenger detectors if bubbles are sufficiently nearby.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confirmation would mean U(1)EM is not a permanent symmetry of the universe but can change at late times.
This mechanism could be searched for in archival data from neutrino observatories or gamma-ray telescopes for unexplained directional bursts.
Similar late-time breaking of other symmetries might produce analogous precursor signals in different particle channels.
The model implies that cosmological phase transitions can leave detectable electromagnetic and weak signatures without requiring new physics at high energies.

Load-bearing premise

Bubble walls slow down from interactions with surrounding matter and radiation so that produced particles reach observers before the wall arrives, and a first-order phase transition occurs at late times with the given scalar potential.

What would settle it

Observation or non-observation of anomalous high-energy photon and neutrino bursts from a specific direction or sky region, timed before any associated cosmic bubble wall effects, would confirm or refute the predicted precursor signals.

read the original abstract

Of the universe's original gauge symmetries, only $SU(3)_c$ (quantum chromodynamics) and $U(1)_{\rm EM}$ (electromagnetism) remain unbroken today. There is, however, no reason to assume that these symmetries are permanent. This paper explores the potential astrophysical observational signatures of a late-time breaking of $U(1)_{\rm EM}$. We present a model with a new massive scalar field whose potential supports a first-order phase transition through the nucleation of true-vacuum bubbles. If the propagation of the bubble walls slows down due to interactions with the surrounding matter and radiation, these signals can reach us before the bubble wall itself arrives. Using the vacuum-mismatch method, we calculate the spectrum of particles produced by such a bubble until the terminal velocity is reached. In addition, we show that frictional dissipation at terminal wall velocity generates a large population of thermally produced scalars and massive photons, which continues even after the mismatch channel shuts off. We then use event generators to simulate the decays of the new scalar and the massive photon into Standard Model particles and obtain, as the final result, the energy spectra of photons and neutrinos. Since the dominant final decay products after hadronization and the decay of unstable particles are photons and neutrinos, they act as long-range signatures of the transition. We also estimate the possible lead time of these photon and neutrino signals relative to the arrival of the bubble wall itself, showing that even a modest subluminal wall velocity can in principle provide an observable precursor. For the conservative set of parameters used here, the thermal channel produces a macroscopically large burst of high-energy photons and neutrinos, which could in principle be detectable from sufficiently nearby bubbles with present or future multi-messenger facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The precursor signals require bubble walls to reach a slow terminal velocity at late times, but the paper assumes this without showing the friction calculation that would make it plausible in the dilute universe.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that any detectable lead time for photons and neutrinos before the bubble wall arrives rests on the walls decelerating to a subluminal terminal speed through friction. Without that, the multi-messenger signature disappears. The paper extends the authors' earlier work by using the vacuum-mismatch method for initial particle production, then adding thermal production of scalars and massive photons once terminal velocity is reached, and finally running event generators to get the photon and neutrino spectra after decays and hadronization. That chain is laid out clearly and produces concrete energy spectra for a conservative parameter choice. The lead-time estimate for modest velocity deficits is also a useful concrete output. The calculation itself looks internally consistent on its own terms and treats the final-state particles in a standard way. The soft spot is the terminal-velocity assumption. The abstract states that interactions with surrounding matter and radiation slow the walls, but at late times the ambient density is low, so the friction force is expected to be weak. No explicit derivation or benchmark for the terminal speed appears in the summary, and the entire precursor scenario collapses if the walls stay relativistic. The scalar potential parameters are labeled conservative yet seem chosen to yield large bursts. This is aimed at hep-ph readers who follow cosmological phase transitions and multi-messenger signals. It has enough structure and an attempt at observable predictions to deserve a serious referee, even though the wall-dynamics part needs strengthening. I would send it for review with the expectation that the friction issue gets addressed or the claims scoped accordingly.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a model with a new massive scalar field whose potential enables a late-time first-order phase transition that breaks U(1)_EM symmetry. Bubble walls are assumed to slow to a subluminal terminal velocity via friction with ambient matter and radiation. Using the vacuum-mismatch method, the authors compute the spectrum of produced particles up to terminal velocity; frictional dissipation then generates a thermal population of scalars and massive photons whose decays (simulated via event generators) yield high-energy photons and neutrinos. The central claim is that these particles constitute a macroscopically large, detectable precursor burst from nearby bubbles, with even modest subluminal wall speeds providing observable lead time.

Significance. If the dynamical assumptions are validated, the work identifies a potentially observable multi-messenger signature of late-time beyond-Standard-Model physics. The use of vacuum-mismatch plus event-generator methods to obtain photon/neutrino spectra is a concrete step toward falsifiable predictions. However, the overall significance remains conditional on the unsubstantiated terminal-velocity assumption and the absence of quantitative flux or sensitivity comparisons.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The claim that 'even a modest subluminal wall velocity can in principle provide an observable precursor' and that the thermal channel yields a 'macroscopically large burst' rests on the assumption that bubble walls decelerate to v < c at late times. No friction calculation, terminal-velocity derivation, or estimate of the friction force from the low-density late-time plasma is provided; without this, the lead-time and precursor signal vanish.
Abstract and calculation sections: The vacuum-mismatch method is invoked to obtain particle spectra, yet no explicit equations, parameter values, error bars, or benchmark comparisons appear. The final photon/neutrino spectra and flux estimates are therefore not reproducible from the given information, undermining the detectability assertion.

minor comments (1)

The abstract refers to 'conservative set of parameters' without defining the ranges or justifying why they are conservative relative to existing constraints on photon mass or scalar couplings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity, reproducibility, and support for the central assumptions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The claim that 'even a modest subluminal wall velocity can in principle provide an observable precursor' and that the thermal channel yields a 'macroscopically large burst' rests on the assumption that bubble walls decelerate to v < c at late times. No friction calculation, terminal-velocity derivation, or estimate of the friction force from the low-density late-time plasma is provided; without this, the lead-time and precursor signal vanish.

Authors: We agree that an explicit friction calculation is absent from the manuscript. The model assumes subluminal terminal velocity due to interactions with ambient matter and radiation, following standard practice in first-order phase transition studies, but no derivation or estimate tailored to the late-time low-density regime is given. In the revised version we will add a new subsection providing an order-of-magnitude estimate of the friction force using the relevant plasma parameters, showing that v << c is reached for the chosen parameter set. This will directly support the lead-time and precursor claims. revision: yes
Referee: Abstract and calculation sections: The vacuum-mismatch method is invoked to obtain particle spectra, yet no explicit equations, parameter values, error bars, or benchmark comparisons appear. The final photon/neutrino spectra and flux estimates are therefore not reproducible from the given information, undermining the detectability assertion.

Authors: We acknowledge that the vacuum-mismatch implementation lacks the explicit equations, numerical inputs, uncertainties, and benchmarks needed for full reproducibility. Although the method follows established references, these details are not provided in the text. The revised manuscript will expand the calculation sections to include the full set of vacuum-mismatch formulas, the specific parameter values employed, a discussion of associated approximations and error estimates, and direct comparisons to known results in the literature. This will make the photon and neutrino spectra and flux estimates reproducible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from stated model assumptions

full rationale

The paper postulates a scalar potential supporting a first-order phase transition, computes particle production via the vacuum-mismatch method up to an assumed terminal wall velocity, and estimates thermal production and lead times under the explicit condition that walls slow due to interactions. No equations or results reduce by construction to inputs (no self-definitional loops, no fitted parameters relabeled as predictions, no load-bearing self-citation chains that force the outcome). The 'conservative parameters' and subluminal velocity condition are presented as modeling choices enabling the signals, not derived tautologically from the final spectra. This is a standard model-building exercise with transparent assumptions; the central claims do not collapse into equivalence with the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of a new scalar field and assumptions about bubble dynamics that are not independently verified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

Scalar potential parameters
Chosen to support a first-order phase transition and to yield conservative but observable signals.
Bubble wall terminal velocity
Assumed subluminal value that controls both precursor lead time and thermal production rates.

axioms (2)

ad hoc to paper A new massive scalar field exists with a potential enabling late-time first-order U(1)EM breaking
Postulated specifically for this model to drive the phase transition.
domain assumption Bubble walls experience sufficient friction from matter and radiation to reach a terminal velocity below light speed
Standard in phase transition studies but essential for the precursor signal to precede the wall.

invented entities (2)

New massive scalar field no independent evidence
purpose: To trigger the late-time U(1)EM symmetry breaking via first-order phase transition
No independent evidence or falsifiable prediction outside the model is provided.
Massive photons no independent evidence
purpose: Produced thermally at the bubble wall and decaying into Standard Model particles
Arise directly from the symmetry breaking in the model with no external confirmation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5629 in / 1850 out tokens · 76997 ms · 2026-05-10T19:32:59.738497+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Greenwood, E

E. Greenwood, E. Halstead, R. Poltis and D. Stojkovic,Dark energy, the electroweak vacua and collider phenomenology,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 103003 [0810.5343]

work page arXiv 2009
[2]

Sengupta, D

A. Sengupta, D. Stojkovic and D.-C. Dai,The Signals of the Doomsday,2501.15848. – 35 –

work page arXiv
[3]

Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum

S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2929

1977
[4]

Coleman and F

S.R. Coleman and F. De Luccia,Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3305

1980
[5]

Vachaspati,Reconstruction of field theory from excitation spectra of defects,Phys

T. Vachaspati,Reconstruction of field theory from excitation spectra of defects,Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 043510 [hep-th/0309086]

work page arXiv 2004
[6]

Kobzarev, L.B

I.Y. Kobzarev, L.B. Okun and M.B. Voloshin,Bubbles in Metastable Vacuum,Yad. Fiz.20 (1974) 1229

1974
[7]

Frampton,Vacuum Instability and Higgs Scalar Mass,Phys

P.H. Frampton,Vacuum Instability and Higgs Scalar Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.37(1976) 1378

1976
[8]

Callan, Jr

C.G. Callan, Jr. and S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762

1977
[9]

Linde,On the Vacuum Instability and the Higgs Meson Mass,Phys

A.D. Linde,On the Vacuum Instability and the Higgs Meson Mass,Phys. Lett. B70(1977) 306

1977
[10]

Linde,Vacuum Instability, Cosmology and Constraints on Particle Masses in the Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys

A.D. Linde,Vacuum Instability, Cosmology and Constraints on Particle Masses in the Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys. Lett. B92(1980) 119

1980
[11]

Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications, Phys

A.D. Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications, Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 37

1981
[12]

Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl

A.D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216(1983) 421

1983
[13]

Krive and A.D

I.V. Krive and A.D. Linde,On the Vacuum Stability Problem in Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B117(1976) 265

1976
[14]

Lee and G.C

T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick,Vacuum Stability and Vacuum Excitation in a Spin 0 Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 2291

1974
[15]

Chang and T.-M

S.-J. Chang and T.-M. Yan,Fermion Contributions to the Effective Potential and the Kink Mass,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 3225

1975
[16]

Strumia,Triggering Higgs vacuum decay,JHEP09(2023) 062 [2301.03620]

A. Strumia,Triggering Higgs vacuum decay,JHEP09(2023) 062 [2301.03620]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Canko, I

D. Canko, I. Gialamas, G. Jelic-Cizmek, A. Riotto and N. Tetradis,On the Catalysis of the Electroweak Vacuum Decay by Black Holes at High Temperature,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 328 [1706.01364]

work page arXiv 2018
[18]

Branchina and E

V. Branchina and E. Messina,Stability, higgs boson mass, and new physics,Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(2013) 241801

2013
[19]

Bentivegna, V

E. Bentivegna, V. Branchina, F. Contino and D. Zappal` a,Impact of New Physics on the EW vacuum stability in a curved spacetime background,JHEP12(2017) 100 [1708.01138]

work page arXiv 2017
[20]

Branchina and E

V. Branchina and E. Messina,Stability and UV completion of the Standard Model,EPL117 (2017) 61002 [1507.08812]

work page arXiv 2017
[21]

Branchina, E

V. Branchina, E. Messina and D. Zappala,Impact of Gravity on Vacuum Stability,EPL116 (2016) 21001 [1601.06963]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Branchina, F

V. Branchina, F. Contino and A. Pilaftsis,Protecting the stability of the electroweak vacuum from Planck-scale gravitational effects,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 075001 [1806.11059]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Branchina, E

V. Branchina, E. Bentivegna, F. Contino and D. Zappal` a,Direct Higgs-gravity interaction and stability of our Universe,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 096029 [1905.02975]. – 36 –

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

Branchina, V

C. Branchina, V. Branchina and F. Contino,Does the cosmological constant really indicate the existence of a dark dimension?,Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.22(2025) 2450305 [2404.10068]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Burda, R

P. Burda, R. Gregory and I. Moss,Gravity and the stability of the higgs vacuum,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 071303 [1501.04937]

work page arXiv 2015
[26]

Burda, R

P. Burda, R. Gregory and I. Moss,Vacuum metastability with black holes,JHEP1508 (2015) 114 [1503.07331]

work page arXiv 2015
[27]

Burda, R

P. Burda, R. Gregory and I. Moss,The fate of the higgs vacuum,JHEP1606(2016) 025 [1601.02152]

work page arXiv 2016
[28]

Appelquist and J

T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone,Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields,Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2856

1975
[29]

D.-C. Dai, R. Gregory and D. Stojkovic,Connecting the Higgs Potential and Primordial Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 125012 [1909.00773]

work page arXiv 2020
[30]

D.-C. Dai, D. Minic and D. Stojkovic,Interaction of cosmological domain walls with large classical objects, like planets and satellites, and the flyby anomaly,JHEP03(2022) 207 [2105.01894]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO

G. Degrassi, S.D. Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori et al.,Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at nnlo,JHEP1208(2012) 098 [1205.6497]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[32]

Black holes as bubble nucleation sites

R. Gregory, I.G. Moss and B. Withers,Black holes as bubble nucleation sites,JHEP03 (2014) 081 [1401.0017]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[33]

Alonso, J.C

R. Alonso, J.C. Criado, R. Houtz and M. West,Walls, bubbles and doom — the cosmology of HEFT,JHEP05(2024) 049 [2312.00881]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Kawana, P

K. Kawana, P. Lu and K.-P. Xie,First-order phase transition and fate of false vacuum remnants,JCAP10(2022) 030 [2206.09923]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Kallosh and A.D

R. Kallosh and A.D. Linde,Dark energy and the fate of the universe,JCAP02(2003) 002 [astro-ph/0301087]

work page arXiv 2003
[36]

Krauss and J

L.M. Krauss and J. Dent,The Late time behavior of false vacuum decay: Possible implications for cosmology and metastable inflating states,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 171301 [0711.1821]

work page arXiv 2008
[37]

Kibble,Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,Phys

T.W.B. Kibble,Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,Phys. Rept.67 (1980) 183

1980
[38]

Espinosa, T

J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions,JCAP06(2010) 028 [1004.4187 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[39]

Espinosa, M

J.R. Espinosa, M. Garny, T. Konstandin and A. Riotto,Gauge-Independent Scales Related to the Standard Model Vacuum Instability,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 056004 [1608.06765]

work page arXiv 2017
[40]

Espinosa and T

J.R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin,An Exploration of Vacuum-Decay Valleys,2506.06154

work page arXiv
[41]

Frieman, C.T

J.A. Frieman, C.T. Hill and R. Watkins,Late Time Cosmological Phase Transitions 1: Particle Physics Models and Cosmic Evolution,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 1226

1992
[42]

Stojkovic, G.D

D. Stojkovic, G.D. Starkman and R. Matsuo,Dark energy, the colored anti-de Sitter vacuum, and LHC phenomenology,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063006 [hep-ph/0703246]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2008
[43]

Sengupta, D

A. Sengupta, D. Stojkovic and L.C.R. Wijewardhana,The signals of doomsday II: Cosmological signatures of late timeSU(3) c symmetry breaking,2510.26267

work page arXiv
[44]

Viswanathan and J.H

K.S. Viswanathan and J.H. Yee,First-order phase transitions in gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 1906

1979
[45]

Schafer, B

A. Schafer, B. Muller and W. Greiner,NEW SCHEME FOR SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING OF COLOR SU(3),Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 2047

1983
[46]

Slansky, J.T

R. Slansky, J.T. Goldman and G.L. Shaw,Observable Fractional Electric Charge in Broken QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 887

1981
[47]

Kusenko, P

A. Kusenko, P. Langacker and G. Segre,Phase transitions and vacuum tunneling into charge and color breaking minima in the MSSM,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5824 [hep-ph/9602414]

work page arXiv 1996
[48]

Bai and B.A

Y. Bai and B.A. Dobrescu,MinimalSU(3)×SU(3)Symmetry Breaking Patterns,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 055024 [1710.01456]

work page arXiv 2018
[49]

West,Millicharged scalar fields, massive photons and the breaking ofSU(3) C ×U(1) EM, Phys

J.R. West,Millicharged scalar fields, massive photons and the breaking ofSU(3) C ×U(1) EM, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 073009 [1711.04534]

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159 [1410.3012]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[51]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3,SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022(2022) 8 [2203.11601]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[52]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621

1986
[53]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085 [1008.4884]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[54]

Yamamoto, T

K. Yamamoto, T. Tanaka and M. Sasaki,Particle spectrum created through bubble nucleation and quantum field theory in the Milne Universe,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 2968 [gr-qc/9412011]

work page arXiv 1995
[56]

Mersini-Houghton,Relation between tunneling and particle production in vacuum decay, Phys

L. Mersini-Houghton,Relation between tunneling and particle production in vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 123521 [hep-th/9902127]

work page arXiv 1999
[57]

Maziashvili,Particle production by the expanding thin walled bubble,Mod

M. Maziashvili,Particle production by the expanding thin walled bubble,Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19(2004) 1391 [hep-th/0311263]

work page arXiv 2004
[58]

Maziashvili,Particle production related to the tunneling in false vacuum decay,Mod

M. Maziashvili,Particle production related to the tunneling in false vacuum decay,Mod. Phys. Lett. A18(2003) 993 [hep-th/0302062]

work page arXiv 2003
[59]

Vachaspati and A

T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin,Quantum state of a nucleating bubble,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 3846

1991
[60]

Swanson,Radiation from initially static vacuum structures,Phys

M.S. Swanson,Radiation from initially static vacuum structures,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 920

1985
[61]

Hamazaki, M

T. Hamazaki, M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka and K. Yamamoto,Selfexcitation of the tunneling scalar field in false vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2045 [gr-qc/9507006]

work page arXiv 1996
[62]

Maziashvili,Particle production by the thick walled bubble,Mod

M. Maziashvili,Particle production by the thick walled bubble,Mod. Phys. Lett. A19(2004) 671 [hep-th/0311232]. – 38 –

work page arXiv 2004
[63]

Turner, E.J

M.S. Turner, E.J. Weinberg and L.M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 2384

1992
[64]

Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions,Helv

M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions,Helv. Phys. Acta67(1994) 451

1994
[65]

Affleck,Quantum Statistical Metastability,Phys

I. Affleck,Quantum Statistical Metastability,Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 388

1981
[66]

Steinhardt,Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay, Phys

P.J. Steinhardt,Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay, Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2074

1982
[67]

Maziashvili,Proper fluctuations associated with quantum tunneling in field theory,Mod

M. Maziashvili,Proper fluctuations associated with quantum tunneling in field theory,Mod. Phys. Lett. A18(2003) 1895 [hep-th/0302095]

work page arXiv 2003
[68]

Tanaka, M

T. Tanaka, M. Sasaki and K. Yamamoto,Field theoretic description of quantum fluctuations in multidimensional tunneling approach,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 1039

1994
[69]

Moore,Electroweak bubble wall friction: Analytic results,JHEP03(2000) 006 [hep-ph/0001274]

G.D. Moore,Electroweak bubble wall friction: Analytic results,JHEP03(2000) 006 [hep-ph/0001274]

work page arXiv 2000
[70]

Moore and T

G.D. Moore and T. Prokopec,How fast can the wall move? a study of the electroweak phase transition dynamics,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 7182–7204 [hep-ph/9506475]

work page arXiv 1995
[71]

Krajewski, M

T. Krajewski, M. Lewicki and M.D. Zych,Hydrodynamical constraints on the bubble wall velocity,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103523 [2303.18216]

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Gouttenoire, R

Y. Gouttenoire, R. Jinno and F. Sala,Friction pressure on relativistic bubble walls,JHEP05 (2022) 004 [2112.07686]

work page arXiv 2022
[73]

Bodeker and G.D

D. Bodeker and G.D. Moore,Electroweak bubble wall speed limit,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (2017) [1703.08215]

work page arXiv 2017
[74]

M´ egevand and A.D

A. M´ egevand and A.D. S´ anchez,Velocity of electroweak bubble walls,Nucl. Phys. B825 (2010) 151–176 [0908.3663]

work page arXiv 2010
[75]

H¨ oche, J

S. H¨ oche, J. Kozaczuk, A.J. Long, J. Turner and Y. Wang,Towards an all-orders calculation of the electroweak bubble wall velocity,JCAP03(2021) 009 [2007.10343]

work page arXiv 2021
[76]

Walker,Particle and Energy Creation by Moving Mirrors,Phys

W.R. Walker,Particle and Energy Creation by Moving Mirrors,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 767

1985
[77]

Davies and S.A

P.C.W. Davies and S.A. Fulling,Radiation from Moving Mirrors and from Black Holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A356(1977) 237

1977
[78]

Good, P.R

M.R.R. Good, P.R. Anderson and C.R. Evans,Time Dependence of Particle Creation from Accelerating Mirrors,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 025023 [1303.6756]. – 39 –

work page arXiv 2013