pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05249 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: no theorem link

Understanding Clinician Experiences with Game-Based Interventions for Autistic Children to Inform a Future Game Platform Focused on Improving Motor Skills

Hunter M Beach , Devin Jay D San Nicolas , Carly Miller , Cathy Ly , Jared Duval
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords autistic childrenmotor skillsgame-based interventionsserious gamesclinician perspectivesparticipatory designmodular platformWizard of Oz
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interviews with therapists show how modular customizable games can reduce rigidity in motor interventions for autistic children

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the experiences of pediatric physical and occupational therapists using games to support motor skill development in autistic children. It establishes that many existing game-based tools are too rigid to fit varied clinical needs despite their motivational benefits. Through interviews and participatory workshops the authors extract eight themes covering successful intervention traits, practical opportunities, and adoption barriers. These findings directly shape a proposed modular platform design called AutMotion Studio that treats interventions as customizable minigames open to community contributions and real-time flexible adjustments.

Core claim

By running semi-structured interviews and participatory design workshops with seven physical therapists and five occupational therapists, the study identified eight prominent themes on the characteristics of effective game and play-based motor interventions, the opportunities they present, and the barriers to their use in everyday clinical practice. These themes informed a speculative design for AutMotion Studio, a modular platform that hosts a suite of interventions as customizable minigames and supports Wizard of Oz paradigms so community members can contribute and employ flexible appropriation strategies to overcome the rigidity common in current Serious Games for Health.

What carries the argument

Thematic analysis of clinician interviews that directly informs the design of a modular platform hosting customizable minigames and Wizard of Oz techniques for flexible appropriation in therapy sessions

If this is right

  • Successful interventions share identifiable characteristics around motivation, clinical relevance, and adaptability that can guide future game design
  • Rigid game structures create concrete barriers to adoption that limit how often therapists can use them with autistic children
  • A modular minigame approach combined with Wizard of Oz methods enables real-time adjustments and community-driven expansion to better match individual child needs and session goals
  • Participatory design with therapists can surface practical requirements that speculative platforms must meet to be viable in clinical settings

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The platform concept could lower the threshold for therapists to try game-based tools by letting them start with small, low-commitment customizations rather than full new systems
  • Similar modular designs might transfer to other therapeutic domains such as social skills or cognitive training where rigidity is also an issue
  • Long-term use of such a platform might generate usage data that reveals which minigame elements most reliably produce motor gains across different children

Load-bearing premise

That the perspectives of the twelve participating therapists generalize to the wider clinical community and that the proposed modular platform can be realized without introducing new implementation barriers or rigidity problems of its own

What would settle it

A larger-scale survey or deployment study that finds substantially different themes around barriers or shows that the modular minigame platform still feels too rigid or difficult to customize during actual therapy sessions

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05249 by Carly Miller, Cathy Ly, Devin Jay D San Nicolas, Hunter M Beach, Jared Duval.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A collage of collected low-fidelity prototypes from our co-design workshops [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Speculative design of a modular therapeutic gaming platform: (a) conceptual flow showing how identified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motor challenges are prevalent among autistic children, and games are able to simultaneously produce clinically meaningful results and provide a motivating context, but many current solutions are too rigid. We conducted a two-phase qualitative study comprised of semi-structured interviews and participatory design workshops with 7 pediatric physical and 5 occupational therapists (PTs/OTs) to investigate their perspectives and experiences with game and play-based interventions. We identified 8 prominent themes describing key characteristics of current successful interventions, opportunities, and barriers to adoption in clinical practice. We present a speculative design informed by thematic analysis that addresses current challenges of rigidity in Serious Games for Health (SG4H). Our modular platform (AutMotion Studio) hosts a suite of interventions as customizable minigames, allowing community members to contribute to and employ Wizard of Oz paradigms for flexible appropriation strategies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper describes a two-phase qualitative study with semi-structured interviews and participatory design workshops involving 7 pediatric physical therapists and 5 occupational therapists. It identifies 8 themes on characteristics of successful game-based interventions for autistic children's motor skills, opportunities for improvement, and barriers to adoption in clinical practice. These themes inform a speculative design for a modular platform (AutMotion Studio) that hosts customizable minigames and supports Wizard-of-Oz appropriation to reduce rigidity in Serious Games for Health (SG4H).

Significance. If the themes prove robust and the design linkage holds, the work offers clinician-grounded insights into barriers like rigidity in existing SG4H tools and proposes a flexible, community-contributable architecture that could lower adoption thresholds. The participatory workshops and explicit focus on appropriation strategies are strengths that align with HCI traditions of co-design for health applications.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: The description of the thematic analysis process (e.g., coding approach, saturation criteria, or how the 8 themes were validated across the 12 participants) is insufficiently detailed to assess the reliability of the data-to-theme mapping that underpins the entire design proposal.
  2. [Results and Design] Results and Design sections: No explicit mapping is provided showing how each of the 8 themes directly informs specific features of AutMotion Studio (e.g., modularity or WoZ support); without this, the claim that the platform addresses the identified rigidity barriers remains an untested inference rather than a demonstrated outcome.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion or Limitations: The manuscript does not include member-checking, follow-up validation with additional clinicians, or any prototype evaluation, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the proposed platform will successfully reduce barriers without introducing new clinical or adoption challenges.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] Abstract and introduction: Participant demographics (e.g., years of experience, practice settings, geographic distribution) are mentioned only at a high level; adding a summary table would improve transparency.
  2. [Design] Figures: If present, any diagrams of the AutMotion Studio architecture should include explicit annotations linking components to the 8 themes for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions we plan to make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The description of the thematic analysis process (e.g., coding approach, saturation criteria, or how the 8 themes were validated across the 12 participants) is insufficiently detailed to assess the reliability of the data-to-theme mapping that underpins the entire design proposal.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the thematic analysis process requires more detailed description to allow for proper assessment of reliability. In the revised manuscript, we will elaborate on the methods by specifying the coding approach (inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's guidelines), how saturation was determined (thematic saturation was reached after 10 interviews with no new codes emerging), and the validation process (themes were discussed and refined in team meetings involving all authors to ensure consistency across the 12 participants). This will strengthen the foundation for the design proposal. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and Design] Results and Design sections: No explicit mapping is provided showing how each of the 8 themes directly informs specific features of AutMotion Studio (e.g., modularity or WoZ support); without this, the claim that the platform addresses the identified rigidity barriers remains an untested inference rather than a demonstrated outcome.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit mapping between the identified themes and the platform features was not included in the original submission. To address this, we will add a dedicated section or table in the revised manuscript that clearly maps each of the 8 themes to specific design elements of AutMotion Studio. For example, themes related to rigidity will be linked to the modular architecture and Wizard-of-Oz support for flexible appropriation. This will make the design rationale more explicit and demonstrate how the platform is intended to address the barriers. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion or Limitations: The manuscript does not include member-checking, follow-up validation with additional clinicians, or any prototype evaluation, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the proposed platform will successfully reduce barriers without introducing new clinical or adoption challenges.

    Authors: This comment highlights an important limitation of the current work. As the study focused on gathering clinician perspectives to inform a speculative design rather than developing and testing a prototype, member-checking and prototype evaluations were not conducted. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Discussion and Limitations sections to explicitly state this, discuss the speculative nature of the design, and outline plans for future work including member-checking, additional validation, and empirical evaluation of the platform. We will also address potential new challenges that could arise from the proposed features. While we cannot retroactively add these validations to the current study, we believe the revisions will appropriately contextualize the claims. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: themes emerge from qualitative data; design is explicitly speculative

full rationale

The paper conducts semi-structured interviews and participatory design workshops with 12 therapists, performs thematic analysis to identify 8 themes, and then presents a speculative design for AutMotion Studio informed by those themes. No mathematical derivations, parameter fitting, predictions, or self-citations appear in the load-bearing steps. The themes are described as arising directly from the collected data, and the platform proposal is labeled as speculative rather than a derived or validated result. This structure is self-contained against external benchmarks with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that therapist self-reports capture real barriers and that a modular design will solve rigidity; no free parameters or invented physical entities, but the platform itself is postulated without independent testing.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The perspectives of the 12 participating therapists accurately reflect key characteristics, opportunities, and barriers in clinical practice.
    Invoked when generalizing from the interview and workshop data to broader recommendations.
  • ad hoc to paper A modular, customizable minigame platform with Wizard of Oz support will address the rigidity problems identified in existing serious games.
    This premise directly motivates the speculative design presented in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • AutMotion Studio no independent evidence
    purpose: Modular platform hosting customizable minigames for motor interventions using community contributions and Wizard of Oz paradigms.
    Newly proposed system intended to overcome rigidity; no implementation or evaluation data provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5453 in / 1491 out tokens · 46330 ms · 2026-05-10T18:43:13.073353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shane, Dylan Oesch-Emmel, Eileen T

    Tooba Ahsen, Christina Yu, Amanda O’Brien, Ralf W Schlosser, Howard C. Shane, Dylan Oesch-Emmel, Eileen T. Crehan, and Fahad Dogar. 2022. Designing a customizable picture-based augmented reality application for therapists and educational professionals working in autistic contexts. InProceedings of the 24th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on compute...

    work page doi:10.1145/3517428.3544884 2022

  2. [2]

    2021.Situated Play Design: Co-creating the Playful Potential of Future Technology

    Ferran Altarriba Bertran. 2021.Situated Play Design: Co-creating the Playful Potential of Future Technology. Ph. D. Dissertation. UC Santa Cruz. https: //escholarship.org/uc/item/06c7s0v3

    2021

  3. [3]

    Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Kather- ine Isbister. 2019. Chasing Play Potentials: Towards an Increasingly Situ- ated and Emergent Approach to Everyday Play Design. InProceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, San Diego CA USA, 1265–1277. doi:10.1145/3322276.3322325

    work page doi:10.1145/3322276.3322325 2019

  4. [4]

    Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Laia Turmo Vidal, Ella Dagan, Jared Duval, Elena Márquez Segura, and Katherine Isbister. 2020. Chasing Play with Instagram: How Can We Capture Mundane Play Potentials to Inspire Interaction Design?. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–8. doi:10.1145/333448...

    work page doi:10.1145/3334480 2020

  5. [5]

    James Auger. 2013. Speculative Design: Crafting the Speculation. 24, 1 (2013), 11–35. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.767276

    work page doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.767276 2013

  6. [6]

    Ringland

    Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Jared Duval, and Kathryn E. Ringland

  7. [7]

    InProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’24)

    DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Re- lated Human-Centered Design. InProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. doi:10.1145/3663548.3675642

    work page doi:10.1145/3663548.3675642

  8. [8]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke and. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology3, 2 (2006), 77–101. arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    work page doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 2006

  9. [9]

    Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, and Gareth Terry. 2019. Thematic analysis.Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (2019), 843–860

    2019

  10. [10]

    Bundy, Shelly Lane, Elizabeth A

    Anita C. Bundy, Shelly Lane, Elizabeth A. Murray, and Anne G. Fisher. 2002.Sensory integration: theory and practice(2nd ed ed.). F.A. Davis, Philadelphia

    2002

  11. [11]

    Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Mat- ters—Facing the Big Issues.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1–31. doi:10.1145/3152421 tex.ids= Bødker_Kyng_2018, b2018a, bodkerParticipatoryDesignThat2018a, bod- ker_participatory_2018 tex.citation-number: 14

    work page doi:10.1145/3152421 2018

  12. [12]

    Calvo, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers

    Rafael A. Calvo, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Autonomy in technology design. InCHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 37–40. doi:10.1145/2559206.2560468

    work page doi:10.1145/2559206.2560468 2014

  13. [13]

    2000.Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment

    James I Charlton. 2000.Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA USA. tex.ids= charlton_nothing_2000

    2000

  14. [14]

    Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Sami Abuhamdeh, and Jeanne Nakamura. 2014. Flow. InFlow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 227–238. tex.ids= csikszentmihalyi_flow_2014

    2014

  15. [15]

    Deci and Richard M

    Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. 2008. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction.Journal of Happiness Studies9, 1 (Jan. 2008), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1 2008

  16. [16]

    Steven Dow, Blair MacIntyre, Jaemin Lee, Christopher Oezbek, Jay David Bolter, and Maribeth Gandy. 2005. Wizard of Oz support throughout an iterative design process.IEEE Pervasive Computing4, 4 (2005), 18–26. tex.ids= dow2005a, dow_wizard_2005 tex.citation-number: 26

    2005

  17. [17]

    2018.Games user research

    Anders Drachen, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, and Lennart E Nacke. 2018.Games user research. Oxford University Press. tex.ids= Drachen_Mirza- Babaei_Nacke_2018, drachen2018a, drachenGamesUserResearch2018a, drachen_games_2018 tex.citation-number: 27

    2018

  18. [18]

    Jared Duval, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Siying Chen, Melissa Chu, Divya Subramonian, Austin Wang, Geoffrey Xiang, Sri Kurniawan, and Katherine Isbister. 2021. Chasing play on TikTok from populations with disabili- ties to inspire playful and inclusive technology design. InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on conference on human factors in computing sys- t...

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445303 2021

  19. [19]

    Jared Duval, Rutul Thakkar, Delong Du, Kassandra Chin, Sherry Luo, Aviv Elor, Magy Seif El-Nasr, and Michael John. 2022. Designing Spellcasters from Clinician Perspectives: A Customizable Gesture-Based Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Stroke Rehabilitation.ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing(April 2022), 3530820. doi:10.1145/3530820 Understanding C...

    work page doi:10.1145/3530820 2022

  20. [20]

    2022.Playful health technology: A participatory, research through design approach to applications for wellness

    Jared Scott Duval. 2022.Playful health technology: A participatory, research through design approach to applications for wellness. Ph. D. Dissertation. UC Santa Cruz

    2022

  21. [21]

    Madeleine Clare Elish. 2019. Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction.Engaging Science, Technology, and Society5 (March 2019), 40–60. doi:10.17351/ests2019.260

    work page doi:10.17351/ests2019.260 2019

  22. [22]

    R Darin Ellis, Thomas B Jankowski, and Jarrod E Jasper. 1998. Participa- tory design of an Internet-based information system for aging services professionals.The Gerontologist38, 6 (1998), 743–748. tex.ids= ellisPartici- patoryDesignInternetbased1998

    1998

  23. [23]

    Alyssa Fiss, Ragnhild Håkstad, Silvana Pereira, Barbara Sargent, Jessica Silveira, Sandra Willett, and Stacey Dusing. 2023. Embedding Play to Enrich Physical Therapy.Behavioral Sciences13 (05 2023), 440. doi:10. 3390/bs13060440

    2023

  24. [24]

    Leo A. Goodman. 1961. Snowball Sampling.The Annals of Mathemati- cal Statistics32, 1 (1961), 148–170. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2237615 tex.ids= Goodman_1961 publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics

    work page arXiv 1961

  25. [25]

    Isabela Granic, Adam Lobel, and Rutger C. M. E. Engels. 2014. The Benefits of Playing Video Games.The American psychologist69, 1 (2014), 66–78

    2014

  26. [26]

    Invisible illness is no longer invisible

    Ria J. Gualano, Lucy Jiang, Kexin Zhang, Andrea Stevenson Won, and Shiri Azenkot. 2023. “Invisible illness is no longer invisible”: Making social VR avatars more inclusive for invisible disability representation. InProceedings of the 25th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and ac- cessibility (ASSETS ’23). Association for Computing Machin...

    work page doi:10.1145/3597638.3614480 2023

  27. [27]

    MacQueen, and Emily E

    Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2012.Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications, Los Angeles. tex.lccn: H62 .G828 2012

    2012

  28. [28]

    Stefan Göbel, Sandro Hardy, Viktor Wendel, Florian Mehm, and Ralf Stein- metz. 2010. Serious Games for Health: Personalized Exergames. InPro- ceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1663–1666. doi:10.1145/1873951.1874316

    work page doi:10.1145/1873951.1874316 2010

  29. [29]

    Taglialatela

    Carrie Heller and Lauren A. Taglialatela. 2018. Circus Arts Therapy®fit- ness and play therapy program shows positive clinical results.International Journal of Play Therapy27, 2 (April 2018), 69–77. doi:10.1037/pla0000068

    work page doi:10.1037/pla0000068 2018

  30. [30]

    Hilton, Allison Attal, John Best, Tim Reistetter, Pete Trapani, and Diane M

    Claudia L. Hilton, Allison Attal, John Best, Tim Reistetter, Pete Trapani, and Diane M. Collins. 2015. Exergaming to Improve Physical and Mental Fitness in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Pilot Study.International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine1, 3 (2015),

    2015

  31. [31]

    doi:10.23937/2469-5718/1510017

    work page doi:10.23937/2469-5718/1510017

  32. [32]

    Jared Duval, Laia Turmo Vidal, Elena Márquez Segura, Yinchu Li, and Annika Waern. 2023. Reimagining Machine Learning’s Role in Assistive Technology by Co-Designing Exergames with Children Using a Partici- patory Machine Learning Design Probe. InThe 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’23). ACM, New York NY US...

    work page doi:10.1145/3597638.3608421 2023

  33. [33]

    Laura Jiménez-Muñoz, Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo, Pilar Calvo-Rivera, Isaac Díaz-Oliván, Manon Moreno, Enrique Baca-García, and Alejandro Porras-Segovia. 2022. Video Games for the Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders52, 1 (2022), 169–188. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-04934-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10803-021-04934-x 2022

  34. [34]

    Fares Kayali, Naemi Luckner, Peter Purgathofer, Katta Spiel, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. Design considerations towards long- term engagement in games for health. InProceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, Malmö Sweden, 1–8. doi:10.1145/3235765.3235789 tex.ids= Kay- ali_Luckner_Purgathofer_Spiel_Fitzpa...

    work page doi:10.1145/3235765.3235789 2018

  35. [35]

    Tanta, Allison Kristine Coombs, and Heather Pannone

    Heather Miller Kuhaneck, Kari J. Tanta, Allison Kristine Coombs, and Heather Pannone. 2013. A Survey of Pediatric Occupational Therapists’ Use of Play.Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention 6, 3 (2013), 213–227. doi:10.1080/19411243.2013.850940

    work page doi:10.1080/19411243.2013.850940 2013

  36. [36]

    Danielle Levac, Laurie Wishart, Cheryl Missiuna, and Virginia Wright

  37. [37]

    The Application of Motor Learning Strategies Within Functionally Based Interventions for Children with Neuromotor Conditions.Pediatric physical therapy21, 4 (2009), 345–355

    2009

  38. [38]

    Gonçalo Ferreira Lobo, David Gonçalves, Pedro Pais, Tiago Guerreiro, and André Rodrigues. 2021. Using Games to Practice Screen Reader Gestures. , Article 94 (2021), 4 pages. doi:10.1145/3441852.3476556

    work page doi:10.1145/3441852.3476556 2021

  39. [39]

    Lucía López-Nieto, Laura María Compañ-Gabucio, Laura Torres-Collado, and Manuela Garcia-de la Hera. 2022. Scoping Review on Play-Based Interventions in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Children9, 9 (2022), 1355. doi:10.3390/children9091355

    work page doi:10.3390/children9091355 2022

  40. [40]

    Laura Malinverni, Joan Mora-Guiard, Vanesa Padillo, Lilia Valero, Amaia Hervás, and Narcis Pares. 2017. An inclusive design approach for develop- ing video games for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Computers in Human Behavior71 (2017), 535–549. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.018 2017

  41. [41]

    2008.Participatory action research

    Alice McIntyre. 2008.Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage

    2008

  42. [42]

    Dalia Mohamed and Hanan Azzam. 2012. Sensory Integration in Atten- tion Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Implications to Postural Control. In Contemporary Trends in ADHD Research, Jill M. Norvilitis (Ed.). InTech. doi:10.5772/28394

    work page doi:10.5772/28394 2012

  43. [43]

    2013.To save everything, click here: The folly of techno- logical solutionism(1

    Evgeny Morozov. 2013.To save everything, click here: The folly of techno- logical solutionism(1. ed ed.). PublicAffairs, New York, NY

    2013

  44. [44]

    Morris, Connor R

    Robert R. Morris, Connor R. Kirschbaum, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2010. Broadening accessibility through special interests: a new approach for soft- ware customization. InProceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGAC- CESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171–178. doi:10.1145/ ...

    work page arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Michael J. Muller. 2002. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. InThe human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 1051–1068. Number of pages: 18

    2002

  46. [46]

    Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Luis Parrilla Bel, and Annika Waern. 2019. Circus, Play and Technology Probes: Training Body Aware- ness and Control with Children. InProceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1223–

    2019

  47. [47]

    doi:10.1145/3322276.3322377 tex.ids= marquez_segura_circus_2019, marquezseguraCircusPlayTechnology2019a

    work page doi:10.1145/3322276.3322377

  48. [48]

    Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, and Asreen Rostami. 2016. Bodys- torming for movement-based interaction design.Human Technology 12, 2 (Nov. 2016), 193–251. doi:10.17011/ht/urn.201611174655 tex.ids= marquez_segura_bodystorming_2016, marquezseguraBodystormingMove- mentbasedInteraction2016a

    work page doi:10.17011/ht/urn.201611174655 2016

  49. [49]

    Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Asreen Rostami, and Annika Waern. 2016. Embodied Sketching. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 6014–6027. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858486

    work page doi:10.1145/2858036.2858486 2016

  50. [50]

    Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Annika Waern, Jared Duval, Luis Parrilla Bel, and Ferran Altarriba Bertran. 2021. Physical warm-up games: Exploring the potential of play and technology design. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14

    2021

  51. [51]

    Jessica Navedo, Amelia Espiritu-Santo, and Shameem Ahmed. 2019. Strength-based ICT design supporting individuals with autism. InPro- ceedings of the 21st international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 560–562. doi:10.1145/3308561.3354637 Number of pages: 3 Place: ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3308561.3354637 2019

  52. [52]

    Lin, Karin A

    Wei Peng, Jih-Hsuan T. Lin, Karin A. Pfeiffer, and Brian Winn. 2012. Need Satisfaction Supportive Game Features as Motivational Determinants: An Experimental Study of a Self-Determination Theory Guided Exergame. Media Psychology15, 2 (2012), 175–196. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.673850

    work page doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.673850 2012

  53. [53]

    Cynthia Putnam, Christina Hanschke, Jennifer Todd, Jonathan Gemmell, and Mia Kollia. 2019. Interactive technologies designed for children with autism: Reports of use and desires from parents, teachers, and therapists. ACM Trans. Access. Comput.12, 3 (Sept. 2019). doi:10.1145/3342285 Number of pages: 37 Place: New York, NY, USA tex.articleno: 12 tex.issue_...

    work page doi:10.1145/3342285 2019

  54. [54]

    Homa Rafiei Milajerdi, Mahmoud Sheikh, Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi, Behnaz Saghaei, Naser Naghdi, and Deborah Dewey. 2021. The Effects of Physical Activity and Exergaming on Motor Skills and Executive Functions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Games for Health Journal10, 1 (2021), 53–61. doi:10.1089/g4h.2019.0180

    work page doi:10.1089/g4h.2019.0180 2021

  55. [55]

    Rautenbach, B

    G. Rautenbach, B. Conolly, M. Hoosain, M. Zunza, and N. A. Plastow and

  56. [56]

    arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2024.2360414 doi:10.1080/19411243.2024.2360414

    The Effect of Play-Based Occupational Therapy on Playfulness and Social Play of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention18, 2 (2025), 248–280. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2024.2360414 doi:10.1080/19411243.2024.2360414

    work page doi:10.1080/19411243.2024.2360414 2025

  57. [57]

    Doris C. Rusch. 2017.Making Deep Games(0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.1201/ 9781315748986

    2017

  58. [58]

    Ryan and Edward L

    Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55, 1 (2000), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    work page doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 2000

  59. [59]

    2014.Play matters

    Miguel Sicart. 2014.Play matters. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts

    2014

  60. [60]

    Miguel Sicart. 2015. Playing the good life: Gamification and ethics.The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications(2015), 225–244. tex.ids= CHI EA ’26, April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain Beach et al. schechnerPlaying1988, sicart_playing_2015 place: US

    2015

  61. [61]

    Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Os Keyes, and Geraldine Fitz- patrick. 2019. Agency of Autistic Children in Technology Re- search—A Critical Literature Review.ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction26, 6 (Dec. 2019), 1–40. doi:10.1145/3344919 tex.ids= Spiel_Frauenberger_Keyes_Fitzpatrick_2019, spielAgencyAutistic- Children2019a

    work page doi:10.1145/3344919 2019

  62. [62]

    2003.Rules of play: game design fundamentals

    Katie Salen Tekinbaş and Eric Zimmerman. 2003.Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    2003

  63. [63]

    Laia Turmo Vidal and Jared Duval. 2024. Ambiguity as a Resource to Design for a Plurality of Bodies. InProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium. ACM, Santa Cruz CA USA, 1–9. doi:10.1145/3686169.3686176

    work page doi:10.1145/3686169.3686176 2024

  64. [64]

    Annika Waern and Jon Back. 2017. Activity as the Ultimate Particular of Interaction Design. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 3390–3402. doi:10.1145/3025453.3025990

    work page doi:10.1145/3025453.3025990 2017

  65. [65]

    Walz and Sebastian Deterding

    Steffen P. Walz and Sebastian Deterding. 2015.The gameful world ap- proaches, issues, applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge. tex.ids= walz_gameful_2015

    2015

  66. [66]

    2018.Resistance and hope: Essays by disabled people

    Alice Wong. 2018.Resistance and hope: Essays by disabled people. Disability Visibility Project

    2018

  67. [67]

    I Am Just Terrified of My Future

    Anon Ymous, Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, Rua M. Williams, Judith Good, Eva Hornecker, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2020. "I Am Just Terrified of My Future": Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI ’20). Association for Comput- ing Machi...

    work page doi:10.1145/3334480.3381828 2020

  68. [68]

    Zampella, Leah A

    Casey J. Zampella, Leah A. L. Wang, Margaret Haley, Anne G. Hutchinson, and Ashley de Marchena. 2021. Motor Skill Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Clinically Focused Review.Current Psychiatry Reports23, 10 (2021), 64. doi:10.1007/s11920-021-01274-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11920-021-01274-y 2021

  69. [69]

    Kexin Zhang, Elmira Deldari, Zhicong Lu, Yaxing Yao, and Yuhang Zhao

  70. [70]

    It’s Just Part of Me:

    “It’s just part of me:” understanding avatar diversity and self- presentation of people with disabilities in social virtual reality. InPro- ceedings of the 24th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on comput- ers and accessibility (ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/3517428.3544829 Number of pages: 16 Place:...

    work page doi:10.1145/3517428.3544829

  71. [71]

    John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 493–502. doi:10.1145/1240624. 1240704

    work page doi:10.1145/1240624 2007

  72. [72]

    John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Anthony Tomasic, and Oscar J. Romero

  73. [73]

    InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Recentering Reframing as an RtD Contribution: The Case of Pivoting from Accessible Web Tables to a Conversational Internet. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–14. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517789

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517789

  74. [74]

    John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. Inproceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, 310–319. tex.ids= zimmerman2010a, zimmer- man_analysis_2010 tex.citation-number: 75

    2010