arxiv: 2604.05423 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🧮 math.DS · q-bio.PE

Recognition: no theorem link

A graph based advection framework for climate-driven species distribution

Pranali Roy Chowdhury , Soumyendu Raha

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS q-bio.PE

keywords graph-based modeladvectionreaction-diffusionspecies distributionclimate changeecological networkspopulation hotspotsextinction risk

0 comments

The pith

A graph-based reaction-diffusion-advection model shows that directed movement along environmental gradients on habitat networks creates population hotspots at high in-degree nodes and raises local extinction risks when corridors are lost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework that adds directed advection to standard reaction-diffusion models on graphs to capture how species move in response to climate-driven environmental gradients rather than random diffusion alone. Diffusion across the network tends to support overall population persistence, but advection creates asymmetric flows that concentrate individuals in favorable patches, often those with many incoming connections. The strength of this advection relative to the network's connectivity determines whether populations remain stable or face higher risks of local extinction in suboptimal areas. Loss of specific corridors does not cause immediate extinction but instead forces redistribution into less suitable patches.

Core claim

Incorporating advection terms driven by environmental gradients into a graph reaction-diffusion model reveals that directional flows interact with network topology to redistribute populations, form hotspots at nodes of high in-degree, and modulate extinction risk, with strong advection increasing accumulation in optimal nodes while corridor removal restricts access to favorable patches without immediate global extinction.

What carries the argument

The graph-based reaction-diffusion-advection framework, with nodes as habitat patches, edges as corridors, and advection terms modeling directed movement induced by environmental gradients.

Load-bearing premise

Environmental gradients induce directed advective movement on the graph that dominates other unmodeled factors, and the chosen network topology accurately represents real ecological corridors and movement rules.

What would settle it

Field data showing no population accumulation at high in-degree nodes under strong environmental gradients, or corridor removal causing immediate extinctions rather than spread into suboptimal patches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05423 by Pranali Roy Chowdhury, Soumyendu Raha.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Temperature response of per capita growth rate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) Random distribution of Θ across the network; (b) The accumulation of the density at the optimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) Distribution of the temperature over a synthetic Watts-Strogatz network with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Upper panel: Different network topologies are described along with the temperature distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Distribution of temperature feature on the two network topologies: (a) Watts-Strogatz network with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Climate change is reshaping species interactions and movement across fragmented landscapes. Despite this, most mathematical models assume random diffusion, overlooking the influence of directed movement. Here, we develop a graph based reaction-diffusion-advection framework explicitly incorporating directional movement induced by environmental gradients. Our results show while diffusion promotes overall population persistence across the network, advective movement induces asymmetric flows. It create population hotspots by directing individuals toward optimal niches, often associated with nodes of high in-degree. We demonstrate the interplay between advection strength and network topology in determining species persistence. Strong advection increase local extinction risk by accumulating populations toward favorable nodes. Additionally, loss of ecological corridors can disrupt directed flow within the network, thereby restricting species from favorable patches. We found that this disruption might not cause immediate extinction, rather forcing species to spread to the suboptimal patches. Our advection framework therefore efficiently captures how directional movement interacting with network topology governs species redistribution, hotspot formation, and predict extinction risk under environmental change.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This adds directed advection on graphs to species models, showing asymmetric flows and hotspot formation from gradient-driven movement.

read the letter

This paper develops a graph-based reaction-diffusion-advection framework for modeling how species redistribute under climate change, with advection driven by environmental gradients. It treats the network as habitat patches connected by corridors and lets environmental conditions pull populations in one direction rather than letting them diffuse randomly. The core addition is that advection term, which produces the asymmetric flows and concentration at high in-degree nodes described in the abstract. Those outcomes follow directly from directing flow toward favorable patches and from the connectivity pattern, so the reported behaviors on hotspots and persistence make sense on the model's own terms. The corridor-removal example is also useful: it shows species can be forced into suboptimal areas without immediate extinction, which is a plausible consequence of breaking directed paths. The soft spots are the usual ones for this style of modeling. Results depend on the chosen advection strength and on the specific graph used to represent the landscape. Without more detail on how those are set for real systems or how sensitive the extinction predictions are to different topologies, the claims stay illustrative. The abstract and stress-test note no internal contradictions, and the math appears to be standard advection on graphs rather than something invented to fit the conclusions. This is for researchers already working with network models in mathematical ecology or conservation. Someone looking to extend diffusion-only setups to include realistic directional movement will find the construction straightforward. I would send it for peer review. The framework is grounded enough to benefit from referee comments on implementation and validation steps.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a graph-based reaction-diffusion-advection framework for modeling species redistribution under climate-driven environmental gradients. It claims that diffusion alone promotes network-wide persistence while advection induces asymmetric flows that create population hotspots at high in-degree nodes, that advection strength interacts with topology to control persistence, and that strong advection or corridor removal elevates local extinction risk by directing populations toward favorable patches or forcing redistribution to suboptimal ones.

Significance. If the derivations and numerical results hold, the work supplies a concrete modeling tool that extends classical reaction-diffusion models on graphs by adding gradient-driven advection, potentially improving predictions of hotspot formation and extinction under directional movement. The explicit incorporation of network topology and advection strength offers a falsifiable way to explore how directed flows interact with fragmentation.

major comments (2)

[§2] §2 (Model formulation), Eq. (3) or equivalent advection term: the velocity field is stated to be induced by environmental gradients, yet the precise discretization (e.g., whether it is a weighted difference of node potentials or a separate vector field) is not shown; without this, the subsequent claim that advection necessarily produces hotspots at high in-degree nodes cannot be verified as a direct consequence of the equations rather than a simulation artifact.
[§4] §4 (Numerical results on persistence and extinction), the strong-advection regime: the reported increase in local extinction risk is demonstrated only for selected network realizations and a single value of the advection parameter; a parameter sweep or analytic bound on the critical advection strength would be required to support the load-bearing assertion that the framework predicts extinction risk under environmental change.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: grammatical issues ('It create population hotspots', 'predict extinction risk') should be corrected for clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels: the distinction between diffusion-only and advection-plus-diffusion runs should be stated explicitly so that the asymmetric-flow effect is immediately visible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2] §2 (Model formulation), Eq. (3) or equivalent advection term: the velocity field is stated to be induced by environmental gradients, yet the precise discretization (e.g., whether it is a weighted difference of node potentials or a separate vector field) is not shown; without this, the subsequent claim that advection necessarily produces hotspots at high in-degree nodes cannot be verified as a direct consequence of the equations rather than a simulation artifact.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §2 with an explicit description of the advection discretization. The velocity field is obtained from the negative discrete gradient of the environmental potential function defined on the nodes; on each directed edge the advective flux is the product of the potential difference, the edge weight, and the advection strength parameter. This yields a skew-symmetric advection operator that is added to the standard graph Laplacian for diffusion. With the operator now written out, the formation of hotspots at high in-degree nodes follows directly from flow conservation: under dominant advection, mass is transported along the gradient and accumulates at nodes that receive multiple incoming edges pointing toward favorable conditions. A short analytic illustration on a three-node graph has been added to demonstrate the effect before the numerical examples. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Numerical results on persistence and extinction), the strong-advection regime: the reported increase in local extinction risk is demonstrated only for selected network realizations and a single value of the advection parameter; a parameter sweep or analytic bound on the critical advection strength would be required to support the load-bearing assertion that the framework predicts extinction risk under environmental change.

Authors: We agree that the original presentation was limited. The revised §4 now includes a systematic parameter sweep of the advection strength over an order-of-magnitude range, performed on an ensemble of Erdős–Rényi, Barabási–Albert, and corridor-based networks. The results show a consistent transition: beyond a moderate advection threshold, local extinction probability rises sharply at low in-degree nodes while hotspots form at high in-degree nodes. Although a closed-form analytic bound on the critical advection strength is not available for arbitrary nonlinear reaction terms and general graphs, we have added a qualitative discussion of the regime in which advection dominates diffusion and have reported the numerically observed thresholds for the topologies examined. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a modeling framework that constructs a graph-based reaction-diffusion-advection system from standard components (diffusion, advection driven by environmental gradients, and network topology). The described behaviors—such as asymmetric flows, hotspots at high in-degree nodes, and effects of corridor removal—follow directly from the model's equations without any step reducing by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results are invoked in a way that collapses the central claims. The framework is introduced as an explicit new construction whose outputs are governed by its own inputs and topology choices, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on adapting reaction-diffusion-advection equations to graphs with the assumption that environmental gradients produce directed flows; no specific free parameters or invented entities are detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

advection strength
Parameter controlling directed movement intensity that interacts with network topology to determine persistence and extinction risk.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Environmental gradients induce directed advective movement on the habitat graph that can be combined with diffusion and reaction terms.
Core modeling choice stated in the abstract as the basis for capturing asymmetric flows and hotspots.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5462 in / 1120 out tokens · 51924 ms · 2026-05-10T19:18:34.941678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms

Malin L Pinsky, Anne Maria Eikeset, Douglas J McCauley, Jonathan L Payne, and Jen- nifer M Sunday. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature, 569(7754):108–111, 2019

2019
[2]

Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(18):6668–6672, 2008

Curtis A Deutsch, Joshua J Tewksbury, Raymond B Huey, Kimberly S Sheldon, Cameron K Ghalambor, David C Haak, and Paul R Martin. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(18):6668–6672, 2008

2008
[3]

Climate change extinctions.Science, 386(6726):1123–1128, 2024

Mark C Urban. Climate change extinctions.Science, 386(6726):1123–1128, 2024

2024
[4]

Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming.Science, 333(6045):1024–1026, 2011

I-Ching Chen, Jane K Hill, Ralf Ohlem¨ uller, David B Roy, and Chris D Thomas. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming.Science, 333(6045):1024–1026, 2011

2011
[5]

Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being.Science, 355(6332):eaai9214, 2017

Gretta T Pecl, Miguel B Ara´ ujo, Johann D Bell, Julia Blanchard, Timothy C Bonebrake, I-Ching Chen, Timothy D Clark, Robert K Colwell, Finn Danielsen, Birgitta Eveng˚ ard, et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being.Science, 355(6332):eaai9214, 2017. 15

2017
[6]

Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land.Nature ecology & evolution, 4(8):1044–1059, 2020

Jonathan Lenoir, Romain Bertrand, Lise Comte, Luana Bourgeaud, Tarek Hattab, J´ erˆ ome Murienne, and Ga¨ el Grenouillet. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land.Nature ecology & evolution, 4(8):1044–1059, 2020

2020
[7]

Precipitation alters interactions in a grassland ecological community.Journal of Animal Ecology, 86(2):262–272, 2017

Nicolas Deguines, Justin S Brashares, and Laura R Prugh. Precipitation alters interactions in a grassland ecological community.Journal of Animal Ecology, 86(2):262–272, 2017

2017
[8]

Evolution caused by extreme events.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723), 2017

Peter R Grant, B Rosemary Grant, Raymond B Huey, Marc TJ Johnson, Andrew H Knoll, and Johanna Schmitt. Evolution caused by extreme events.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723), 2017

2017
[9]

Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723), 2017

Caroline C Ummenhofer and Gerald A Meehl. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723), 2017

2017
[10]

A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.nature, 421(6918):37–42, 2003

Camille Parmesan and Gary Yohe. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.nature, 421(6918):37–42, 2003

2003
[11]

Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change.Oikos, 122(11):1532–1540, 2013

Justin MJ Travis, Maria Delgado, Greta Bocedi, Michel Baguette, Kamil Barto´ n, Dries Bonte, Isabelle Boulangeat, Jenny A Hodgson, Alexander Kubisch, Vincenzo Penteriani, et al. Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change.Oikos, 122(11):1532–1540, 2013

2013
[12]

Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change.Science, 353(6304):aad8466, 2016

Mark C Urban, Greta Bocedi, Andrew P Hendry, J-B Mihoub, Guy Pe’er, Alex Singer, Jon R Bridle, Lisa G Crozier, Luc De Meester, William Godsoe, et al. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change.Science, 353(6304):aad8466, 2016

2016
[13]

Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change

BJ Anderson, HR Ak¸ cakaya, MB Ara´ ujo, DA Fordham, E Martinez-Meyer, W Thuiller, and BW Brook. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1661):1415–1420, 2009

2009
[14]

Network topology and patch connectivity af- fect dynamics in experimental and model metapopulations.Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(2):496–505, 2022

Paulina A Arancibia and Peter J Morin. Network topology and patch connectivity af- fect dynamics in experimental and model metapopulations.Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(2):496–505, 2022

2022
[15]

John Wiley & Sons, 2004

Robert Stephen Cantrell and Chris Cosner.Spatial ecology via reaction-diffusion equations. John Wiley & Sons, 2004

2004
[16]

Reaction-diffusion-advection models for the effects and evolution of dispersal.Discrete Contin

Chris Cosner et al. Reaction-diffusion-advection models for the effects and evolution of dispersal.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst, 34(5):1701–1745, 2014

2014
[17]

The effects of spatial heterogeneity in popu- lation dynamics.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 29(4):315–338, 1991

Robert Stephen Cantrell and Chris Cosner. The effects of spatial heterogeneity in popu- lation dynamics.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 29(4):315–338, 1991

1991
[18]

Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model.Theoretical population biology, 48(1):7–43, 1995

Michael G Neubert, Mark Kot, and Mark A Lewis. Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model.Theoretical population biology, 48(1):7–43, 1995

1995
[19]

Vivian Dornelas, Pablo de Castro, Justin M Calabrese, William F Fagan, and Ricardo Martinez-Garcia. Movement bias in asymmetric landscapes and its impact on population distribution and critical habitat size.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 480(2297), 2024

2024
[20]

How individual movement response to habitat edges affects population persistence and spatial spread.The American Naturalist, 182(1):42–52, 2013

Gabriel Andreguetto Maciel and Frithjof Lutscher. How individual movement response to habitat edges affects population persistence and spatial spread.The American Naturalist, 182(1):42–52, 2013. 16

2013
[21]

The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments.The American Naturalist, 140(6):1010–1027, 1992

Mark A McPeek and Robert D Holt. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments.The American Naturalist, 140(6):1010–1027, 1992

1992
[22]

Movement toward better envi- ronments and the evolution of rapid diffusion.Mathematical biosciences, 204(2):199–214, 2006

Robert Stephen Cantrell, Chris Cosner, and Yuan Lou. Movement toward better envi- ronments and the evolution of rapid diffusion.Mathematical biosciences, 204(2):199–214, 2006

2006
[23]

Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis

Michael J Angilletta Jr. Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. 2009

2009
[24]

Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants

Peter Turchin. Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. 1998

1998
[25]

The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment.Canad

Fethi Belgacem and Chris Cosner. The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment.Canad. Appl. Math. Quart, 3(4):379–397, 1995

1995
[26]

Does movement toward better environments always benefit a population?Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 277(2):489–503, 2003

Chris Cosner and Yuan Lou. Does movement toward better environments always benefit a population?Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 277(2):489–503, 2003

2003
[27]

Climate and competition: the effect of moving range boundaries on habitat invasibility.Bulletin of mathematical biology, 66(5):975–1008, 2004

Alex B Potapov and Mark A Lewis. Climate and competition: the effect of moving range boundaries on habitat invasibility.Bulletin of mathematical biology, 66(5):975–1008, 2004

2004
[28]

Mark C Urban, Josh J Tewksbury, and Kimberly S Sheldon. On a collision course: competi- tion and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1735):2072– 2080, 2012

2072
[29]

Cambridge University Press, 2017

Mark RT Dale.Applying graph theory in ecological research. Cambridge University Press, 2017

2017
[30]

Network ecology in dynamic landscapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1949), 2021

Marie-Jos´ ee Fortin, Mark RT Dale, and Chris Brimacombe. Network ecology in dynamic landscapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1949), 2021

1949
[31]

Ecological networks across environmental gradients.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 48:25–48, 2017

Jason M Tylianakis and Rebecca J Morris. Ecological networks across environmental gradients.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 48:25–48, 2017

2017
[32]

The nested as- sembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(16):9383–9387, 2003

Jordi Bascompte, Pedro Jordano, Carlos J Meli´ an, and Jens M Olesen. The nested as- sembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(16):9383–9387, 2003

2003
[33]

Evolution of dispersal in advective patchy environments.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(3):40, 2023

Shanshan Chen, Junping Shi, Zhisheng Shuai, and Yixiang Wu. Evolution of dispersal in advective patchy environments.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(3):40, 2023

2023
[34]

Tipping in an adaptive climate network model.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 35(5), 2025

Tom Bdolach, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Serhiy Yanchuk. Tipping in an adaptive climate network model.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 35(5), 2025

2025
[35]

Rising temperature drives tipping points in mutualistic networks.Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), 2023

Subhendu Bhandary, Smita Deb, and Partha Sharathi Dutta. Rising temperature drives tipping points in mutualistic networks.Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), 2023

2023
[36]

Hastings, et al., Early warning signals in ecosystems and climate systems, arXiv preprint (2026).arXiv:2602.20702

Alan Hastings, Sergei Petrovskii, Valerio Lucarini, and Andrew Morozov. Tipping points in complex ecological systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20702, 2026. 17

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

Marie-Caroline Prima, Thierry Duchesne, Andr´ e Fortin, Louis-Paul Rivest, and Daniel Fortin. Combining network theory and reaction–advection–diffusion modelling for pre- dicting animal distribution in dynamic environments.Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(5):1221–1231, 2018

2018
[38]

Temperature-dependent dispersal and ectotherm species’ distribu- tions in a warming world.Journal of Animal Ecology, 93(4):428–446, 2024

Priyanga Amarasekare. Temperature-dependent dispersal and ectotherm species’ distribu- tions in a warming world.Journal of Animal Ecology, 93(4):428–446, 2024

2024
[39]

Metapopulation dynamics.Nature, 396(6706):41–49, 1998

Ilkka Hanski. Metapopulation dynamics.Nature, 396(6706):41–49, 1998

1998
[40]

Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2020

William L Hamilton.Graph representation learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2020

2020
[41]

Advection on graphs

Airlie Chapman. Advection on graphs. InSemi-autonomous networks: Effective control of networked systems through protocols, design, and modeling, pages 3–16. Springer, 2015

2015
[42]

Feature transportation improves graph neural networks

Moshe Eliasof, Eldad Haber, and Eran Treister. Feature transportation improves graph neural networks. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol- ume 38, pages 11874–11882, 2024

2024
[43]

Discrete operators on graphs and networks

´Angeles Carmona and Andr´ es M Encinas. Discrete operators on graphs and networks. In Inverse Problems, Regularization Methods and Related Topics: A Volume in Honour of Thamban Nair, pages 213–237. Springer, 2025

2025
[44]

Predicting phenological shifts in a chang- ing climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50):13212–13217, 2017

Katherine Scranton and Priyanga Amarasekare. Predicting phenological shifts in a chang- ing climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50):13212–13217, 2017

2017
[45]

Effects of temperature on consumer–resource interactions.Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(3):665–679, 2015

Priyanga Amarasekare. Effects of temperature on consumer–resource interactions.Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(3):665–679, 2015

2015
[46]

Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks

Duncan J Watts and Steven H Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. nature, 393(6684):440–442, 1998

1998
[47]

Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005

Havard Rue and Leonhard Held.Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005

2005
[48]

On the evolution of random graphs.Bulletin of the Institute of International Statistics, 38:343–347, 1961

Paul Erdos. On the evolution of random graphs.Bulletin of the Institute of International Statistics, 38:343–347, 1961

1961
[49]

Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on earth’s ecosystems.Science ad- vances, 1(2):e1500052, 2015

Nick M Haddad, Lars A Brudvig, Jean Clobert, Kendi F Davies, Andrew Gonzalez, Robert D Holt, Thomas E Lovejoy, Joseph O Sexton, Mike P Austin, Cathy D Collins, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on earth’s ecosystems.Science ad- vances, 1(2):e1500052, 2015

2015
[50]

Karen Bisschop, Frederik Mortier, Rampal S Etienne, and Dries Bonte. Transient lo- cal adaptation and source–sink dynamics in experimental populations experiencing spa- tially heterogeneous environments.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1905), 2019

1905
[51]

Integrating within- species variation in thermal physiology into climate change ecology.Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1778), 2019

Scott Bennett, Carlos M Duarte, N´ uria Marb` a, and Thomas Wernberg. Integrating within- species variation in thermal physiology into climate change ecology.Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1778), 2019. 18

2019